Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2015 First Report of the Papaya Mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), in China and Genetic Record for Its Recent Invasion in Asia and Africa
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), is a polyphagous pest that damages many tropical crops. It is a native of Central America and spread to the Caribbean region and South America in the 1990s; since then it has accidentally been introduced to some islands in the Pacific region and some countries in Africa and Asia. We recorded its presence in China for the first time in 2013 from Guangdong Province and Yunnan Province in southern and southwestern China, respectively. Our genetic analysis revealed that only 1 haplotype of P. marginatus has been recorded in all of Asia, including China, reflecting the very recent invasion of P. marginatus in Asia. This study also includes a summary of the global geographical distribution of P. marginatus.

The papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), is a small, yellowish, polyphagous sucking insect and is considered a significant pest of many tropical and subtropical fruits, vegetables, and ornamental plants (Miller et al. 2002). It feeds on the sap of plants by inserting its stylets into the epidermis of the leaf and into the fruit and stem. The leaves become crinkled, yellowish, and withered (Tanwar et al. 2010; Suganthy et al. 2012; Kirsur et al. 2014; Ben-Dov 2015). Sooty mold develops on honeydew excreted by this mealybug; this mold eventually covers the leaves, fruits, and stems, impeding photosynthesis and gaseous exchange. The result is chlorosis, plant stunting, leaf deformation, early dropping of the leaves and fruits, a heavy accumulation of honeydew, and death of the host plants. The mealybug also deposits a thick, white, waxy material that can make plants inedible (Muniappan 2011). Although the papaya mealybug originated in Mexico, it was not a serious pest there or in Central America as its natural enemies kept it under control (Miller et al. 1999). However, when it spread to the Caribbean and to Florida, USA, the mealybug caused significant yield losses not only in papaya but in more than 60 other crops, particularly horticultural species (Miller et al. 2002; Meyerdirk et al. 2004; Walker et al. 2006; Heu et al. 2007).

Paracoccus marginatus was first collected in Mexico in 1955 but first described by Williams and Granara de Willink in 1992 from Mexican specimens collected on cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz; Malpighiales: Euphorbiaceae); it was thus thought to be native to Mexico and South/Central America (Williams & de Willink 1992; Miller et al. 1999, 2001; Miller & Miller 2002). It was first reported as a pest of papaya (Carica papaya L.; Capparales: Caricaceae) in the Caribbean during the 1990s, and by 2000 it had spread to many Caribbean countries as well as Florida in the United States (Pollard 1999; Muniappan 2009). Over the next decade, there were additional reports from many countries in Oceania, Asia, and Africa (Meyerdirk et al. 2004; Muniappan et al. 2006, 2008, 2009; Muniappan 2009).

Paracoccus marginatus was first reported in India in 2008, and in subsequent years it has invaded 9 additional Asian countries (Muniappan 2009, 2011; Chen et al. 2011; Myrick et al. 2014). In this study, we provide the first report of its presence in southern and eastern parts of China and identify its genetic haplotype in China and other Asian and African countries. These results provide the only genetic survey of P. marginatus from Asia and enhance our understanding of the invasion of this detrimental insect pest.

Materials and Methods

SAMPLE COLLECTION

We designated in total 12 sites in mainland China, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Mozambique (Table 1) and used 3 individuals from each. The samples from Cambodia, Malaysia, and Mozambique were intercepted at the entry port of China. However, the Chinese samples were taken randomly from those sites wherever the pest was reported in China. Specimens of P. marginatus were collected with forceps and preserved in 95% alcohol. Species identifications were confirmed using both morphological characters (Miller & Miller 2002) and DNA barcodes from BOLD System V3 (Ratnasingham & Hebert 2007). For the haplotype analysis, we also incorporated genetic data from specimens collected at an additional 9 sites in India, Indonesia, and Thailand; sequences were downloaded from GenBank, BOLD, and EMBLEBI (Table 1).

DNA EXTRACTION

The total genomic DNA was extracted from individual specimens of P. marginatus using a Promega Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Madison, Wisconsin, USA). We used Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit animal tissue protocols as described in their technical manual, #TM050 ( http://www.promega.com/resources/protocols/technical-manuals/0/wizard-genomic-dna-purification-kit-protocol/).

Table 1.

Identification and distribution for the haplotype of Paracoccus marginatus samples along with its genetic identities.

t01_1157.gif

PCR AMPLIFICATION

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was performed in 25 µL volume reactions using final concentrations of the following reagents: 2.5 µL of 1× PCR buffer, 1.5 µL of 25 mM MgCl2, 2.5 µL of 2 mM dNTP mix with 0.2 mM of each nucleotide, 1.25 µL of each 0.5 µM primer, 2.0 µL of 50–125 ng DNA template, 0.5 µL of 0.5 U of DNA polymerase containing 5 U/µL (Takara), and 14.75 µL of nuclease-free water. We amplified partial sequences (~800 bp) of the cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene using the universal primer pairs CJ-J-2183 (alias Jerry, 5′-CAACATTTATTTTGATT TTTTGG-3′) and TL2-N-3014 (alias Pat, 5′-TCCAATGCACTAATCTGCCATATTA-3′) (Simon et al. 1994). The COI gene was amplified under the following conditions: 3 min at 95 °C, followed by 30 cycles at 94 °C for 1 min, 57 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1min, and a post-cycle incubation at 72 °C for 5 min. After that, 5 µL of the PCR product underwent electrophoresis on 1.2% agarose gels. When bands of the expected size, ~800 bp, were visible in the gels, the other 20 µL of the PCR product was used for sequencing using an ABI 3730xl sequencer (Invitrogen Life Tech Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) with the same primers for both directions.

ALIGNMENT

Sequences were aligned using multiple sequence alignment with the “GINSI” algorithm in MAFFT (Tamura et al. 2011). The ends with incomplete codons were then trimmed to produce 712 bp alignments. In order to exclude possible nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes (numts) commonly found in invertebrates (Buhay 2009), we screened translated COI sequences for stop codons.

GENETIC NETWORKING

Analyzing closely related populations is challenging because the small genetic distances between individuals can obscure evolutionary pathways. In these cases, tree-based phylogenetic methods are poor at representing intraspecific gene evolution (De Barro & Ahmed 2011). Network analysis is a more appropriate means of exploring relationships within species, and many different networking approaches have been developed to estimate intraspecific genealogies (Fitch 1997; Bandelt et al. 1999).

The haplotype identifier refers to haplotypes belonging to various locations; the haplotype identifiers are listed in Table 1. The sequences were analyzed using statistical parsimony (Templeton et al. 1992; Posada & Crandall 2001) with the program TCS v.1.21 (Clement et al. 2000) with a cut-off set at 95% (Hart & Sunday 2007; Chen et al. 2010). Each sequence was assigned a haplotype identifier (Table 1), and the resulting network provided both the relationship between the different haplotypes and the significant number of substitutions connecting haplotypes (Templeton et al. 1992).

Twenty-one COI sequences were analyzed for genetic identity, 12 of which were sequenced specifically for this study. Most sequences were from China (2 from Yunnan and 4 from Guangzhou) and India (7), and the rest from Cambodia (3), Indonesia (1), Malaysia (1), Mozambique (2), and Thailand (1).

GENETIC DISTANCES

Pair-wise genetic distance values were calculated in MEGA5 (Tamura et al. 2011). The use of the genetic species concept and these values are not meant to be a strict delimitation, but are a guide to help estimate the number of possible genetic lineages in our samples.

Results

FIRST RECORD OF P. MARGINATUS IN CHINA AND ITS DISTRIBUTION IN THE WORLD

Our study recorded the first presence of P. marginatus from 2 provinces of China: the southwestern Yunnan Province and the southern Guangzhou Province. Chinese specimens were found on 4 host plants: C. papaya, Jatropha integerrima Jacquard, Jatropha cuarcas L. (Malpighiales: Euphorbiaceae), and Plumeria rubra L. (Gentianales: Apocynaceae). Our study also provides the first Southeast African record of P. marginatus, in Mozambique. In addition, we surveyed the invasion history of P. marginatus and found that it has invaded more than 54 countries and regions in the last 22 yr (Table 2).

HAPLOTYPE DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTION OF P. MARGINATUS

We analyzed the genetic identities of Chinese populations of P. marginatus and compared them with genetic identities of P. marginatus populations from 6 other countries in Asia and Africa. The results indicated that only 1 haplotype is present across all sampled countries (Table 1).

Discussion

Shortly after P. marginatus was first reported to have invaded India in 2008, it was found to have invaded a number of other Asian countries Our study adds the first Chinese records, from 2 noncontiguous provinces, and the first record from southeastern Africa. This further demonstrates the potential for P. marginatus to rapidly invade new regions.

The presence of the same of P. marginatus haplotype across all sampled Asian countries suggests that all specimens stem from the same population resource that initially invaded Asia in 2008, and perhaps from the same population that entered Mozambique. This is another typical case of rapid invasion given that the reported rate of COI evolution for some model insects is ~1.5 to 2.3% per million years ago (Nakamine & Takeda 2008). Similar cases have been found with other invasive Sternorrhyncha. A single haplotype of the cotton mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) has undergone a very recent rapid invasion in China (Ahmed et al. 2015), and a single haplotype of an invasive whitefly has established a global distribution (De Barro & Ahmed 2011).

The low levels of variation between geographically distant populations of Asia support the hypothesis that this was a recent invasion that likely occurred during the last 4 to 6 yr. However, the route that P. marginatus used as it spread across regions is still unclear. More sampling and investigating of genetic identities of P. marginatus from its native countries in South and Central America and from other invaded countries, especially those in the Caribbean, will help to understand the precise route of its invasion.

One interesting topic we were unable to address with our data is whether certain external factors contributed to the rapid spread of P. marginatus populations across Asia. One report suggests trade of ornamental flowers could have facilitated the invasion (Qian et al. 2007). However, the mealybug itself was reported to have high biological adaptability, ecological adjustability, temperature tolerance, and a wide range of host plants that may help it to establish quickly in newly invaded places (Arif et al. 2009; Hodgson 2009; Vennila et al. 2011, 2013; Xin et al. 2011). This rapid spread suggests that current quarantine measures have failed to stop the invasion of P. marginatus into China and other neighboring countries. Therefore, officially listing P. marginatus as an invasive species, along with revised quarantine regulations and protocols, may help stop further invasion by this devastating pest.

The recent establishment of P. marginatus is of serious concern because it is a major pest of many species of tropical fruits, vegetable crops, and ornamental plants. Multiple control strategies should be developed such as early detection and eradication in the areas with new records, and biological control for areas where P. marginatus has been established. Within 3 mo of the first discovery of P. marginatus in Indonesia, the magnitude of the mealybug problem caused the government to consider development of a classical biological control program against it (Muniappan et al. 2008). Successful results with classical biological control were achieved in India, Guam, Palau, Florida, and Hawaii in recent years (Meyerdirk et al. 2004; Muniappan et al. 2006; Walker et al. 2006; Heu et al. 2007). In India, an encyrtid parasitoid of papaya mealybug, namely, Acerophagus papayae Noyes & Schauff (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), was imported from Puerto Rico and released after multiplication. The introduction of A. papayae provided excellent control of the papaya mealybug within 5 mo along with reduced pesticide use, increased production, and increased income (Myrick et al. 2014). This success suggests that classical biological control may also be a viable option against P. marginatus in China.

Table 2.

Survey of the global invasion of Paracoccus marginatus since the first reports of its invasiveness.

t02a_1157.gif

continued

t02b_1157.gif

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National “Twelfth Five-Year” Plan program for Science & Technology Support (2012BAK11B01) and Guangdong CIQ project (2015GDK14). Many thanks go to Li Hua Lv and Fu Zhong Wu for their help in sample collections. Special thanks to David Plotkin (Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, USA) and Asma Zeiri (Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences of Bizerte, Bizerte, Tunisia) for their useful comments on our initial analysis.

References Cited

1.

MZ Ahmed , BL Qiu , RR He , MT Wu , F Liang , JP Zhao , L Lin , XN Hu , LH Lv , JW Breinholt , YY Lu , J Ma. 2015. Genetic record for a recent invasion of the mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Asia. Environmental Entomology 44: 907–918. Google Scholar

2.

MI Arif , M Rafiq , A Ghaffar. 2009. Host plants of cotton mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis): a new menace to cotton agroecosystem of Punjab, Pakistan. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 11: 163–167. Google Scholar

3.

R Ayyasamy , A Regupathy. 2010. Need and scope for insecticide resistance management for the invasive papaya mealy bug Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink in small scale papaya farming system in Tamil Nadu, India. Resistant Pest Management Newsletter 19: 23–28. Google Scholar

4.

HJ Bandelt , P Forster , A Rohl. 1999. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 37–48. Google Scholar

5.

Y Ben-Dov. 2015. Paracoccus marginatus Williams & Granara de Willink,  http://www.sel.barc.usda.gov/catalogs/pseudoco/Paracoccusmarginatus.htm (last accessed 26 Sep 2015). Google Scholar

6.

JE Buhay. 2009. “COI-like” sequences are becoming problematic in molecular systematic and DNA barcoding studies. Journal of Crustacean Biology 29: 96–110. Google Scholar

7.

H Chen , M Strand , JL Norenburg , S Sun , H Kajihara , AV Chernyshev , SA Maslakova , P Sunderbergn . 2010. Statistical parsimony networks and species assemblages in cephalotrichid nemerteans (Nemertea). PLoS One 5: e12885. Google Scholar

8.

S-P Chen , J-Y Wong , W-J Wu. 2011. Preliminary report on the occurrence of papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink, in Taiwan. Journal of Taiwan Agricultural Research 60: 72–76. Google Scholar

9.

M Clement , D Posada , KA Crandall. 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology 9: 1657–1659. Google Scholar

10.

P De Barro , MZ Ahmed. 2011. Genetic networking of the Bemisia tabaci cryptic species complex reveals pattern of biological invasions. PLoS One 6: e25579. Google Scholar

11.

W Fitch. 1997. Networks and viral evolution. Journal of Molecular Evolution 44: 65–75. Google Scholar

12.

LD Galanihe , MUP Jayasundera , A Vithana , N Asselaarachchi , GW Watson. 2010. Occurrence, distribution and control of papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), an invasive alien pest in Sri Lanka. Tropical Agricultural Research and Extension 13: 81–86. Google Scholar

13.

J Germain , D Pastou , E Lucas , J Minatchy , H Hostachy. 2010. Paracoccus marginatus, une nouvelle cochenille sur papayer à la Réunion. Phytoma 633: 9–10. Google Scholar

14.

JF Germain , P Sookar , I Buldawoo , S Permaloo , S Quillici. 2014. Three species of potentially invasive scale insects new for Mauritius (Hemiptera, Coccoidea, Pseudococcidae). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 119: 27–29. Google Scholar

15.

MW Hart , J Sunday. 2007. Things fall apart: biological species form unconnected parsimony networks. Biology Letters 3: 509–512. Google Scholar

16.

R Heu , M Fukada , P Conant. 2007. Papaya Mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). New Pest Advisory. State of Hawaii Department of Agriculture, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. Google Scholar

17.

C Hodgson. 2009. Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae), an invasive mealybug damaging cotton in Pakistan and India, with a discussion on seasonal morphological variation (pg 1, 2008). Zootaxa 2031: 68. Google Scholar

18.

L Jn Pierre. 2008. Mitigating the threat of invasive alien species in the insular Caribbean (Saint Lucia). Report to CAB International. Google Scholar

19.

MV Kirsur , N Sakthivel , A Mahimasanthi , S Balasaraswathi , BB Bindroo. 2014. Weed hosts of papaya mealybug (Paracoccus marginatus) in mulberry ecosystem of Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Sericulture 53: 78–80. Google Scholar

20.

R Krishnakumar , V Rajan. 2009. Record of papaya mealybug Paracoccus marginatus infesting mulberry in Kerala. Insect Environment 15: 142. Google Scholar

21.

KR Lyla , BM Philip. 2010. Incidence of papaya mealybug Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Kerala. Insect Environment 15: 156. Google Scholar

22.

M Mani , AN Shylesha , C Shivaraju. 2012. First report of the invasive papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Williams & Granara de Willink (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in Rajasthan. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems 18: 234. Google Scholar

23.

MI Mastoi , Azura A Nur , R Muhammad , AB Idris , Y Ibrahim. 2011. First report of papaya mealybug Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) from Malaysia. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 5: 1247–1250. Google Scholar

24.

D Matile-Ferrero , J Etienne. 1998. Paracoccus marginatus Williams & Granara de Willink, a new introduction in Guadeloupe and Saint-Barthélemy (Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae). Revue Française d'Entomologie 20: 142. Google Scholar

25.

D Matile-Ferrero , J Etienne , G Tiego. 2000. Introduction of two important pests for the French Guyana: Maconellicoccus hirsutus and Paracoccus marginatus (Hem., Coccoidea, Pseudococcidae). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 105: 485–486. Google Scholar

26.

DE Meyerdirk , R Muniappan , R Warkentin , J Bamba , GVP Reddy. 2004. Biological control of the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Guam. Plant Protection Quarterly 19: 110–114. Google Scholar

27.

DR Miller , GL Miller. 2002. Redescription of Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae), including descriptions of the immature stages and adult male. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 104: 1–23. Google Scholar

28.

DR Miller , DJ Williams , AB Hamon. 1999. Notes on a new mealybug (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae) pest in Florida and the Caribbean: the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink. Insecta Mundi 13: 179–181. Google Scholar

29.

DR Miller , GL Miller , GW Watson. 2002. Invasive species of mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and their threat to U.S. agriculture. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 104: 825–836. Google Scholar

30.

GL Miller , DR Miller , GW Watson. 2001. Mealybug invasions, a threat to plants everywhere. Bollettino di Zoologia Agraria e di Bachicoltura 33: 507. Google Scholar

31.

R Muniappan. 2008. Invasion of Papaya Mealybug in Asia. IPM CRSP, OIRED, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA. Google Scholar

32.

R Muniappan. 2009. Invasion of papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus in Asia. Conference Paper, 57th Annual Meeting of the Entomological Society of America, 13–16 Dec, Indiana, USA. Google Scholar

33.

R Muniappan . 2011. Recent invasive hemipterans and their biological control in Asia. Conference Paper, 5th Meeting of the Asian Cotton Research & Development Network,  https://www.icac.org/tis/regional_networks/asian_network/meeting_5/documents/papers/PapMuniappanR.pdf (last accessed 22 Apr 2015). Google Scholar

34.

R Muniappan , DE Meyerdirk , FM Sengebau , DD Berringer , GVP Reddy. 2006. Classical biological control of the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in the Republic of Palau. Florida Entomologist 89: 212–217. Google Scholar

35.

R Muniappan , BM Shepard , GW Watson , GR Carner , D Sartiami , A Rauf , MD Hammig. 2008. First report of the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), in Indonesia and India. Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology 25: 37–40. Google Scholar

36.

R Muniappan , BM Shepard , GW Watson , GR Carner , A Rauf , D Sartiami , P Hidayat , JVK Afun , G Goergen , AKMZ Rahman. 2009. New records of invasive insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha) in Southeast Asia and West Africa. Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology 26: 167–174. Google Scholar

37.

S Myrick , GW Norton , KN Selvaraj , K Natarajan , R Muniappan. 2014. Economic impact of classical biological control of papaya mealybug in India. Crop Protection 56: 82–86. Google Scholar

38.

H Nakamine , M Takeda . 2008. Molecular phylogenetic relationships of flightless beetles belonging to the genus Mesechthistatus Breuning (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) inferred from mitochondrial COI gene sequences. Journal of Insect Science 8: article 70. Google Scholar

39.

DS Park , SJ Suh , PD Hebert , HW Oh , KJ Hong. 2011. DNA barcodes for two scale insect families, mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and armored scales (Hemiptera: Diaspididae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 101: 429–434. Google Scholar

40.

GV Pollard. 1999. Paracoccus marginatus. CARAPHIN News 18: 7. Google Scholar

41.

D Posada , KA Crandall. 2001. Intraspecific gene genealogies: trees grafting into networks. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 37–45. Google Scholar

42.

T Qian , D Joyce , S He. 2007. China's ornamentals industry is in “full bloom.” Centre for Native Floriculture Report 2007: 1–6. Google Scholar

43.

S Ratnasingham , PDN Hebert. 2007. BOLD: the Barcode of Life Data system ( www.barcodinglife.org). Molecular Ecology Notes 7: 355–364. Google Scholar

44.

AK Sarma. 2013. Invasion of papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus in Assam. Indian Journal of Entomology 75: 355–356. Google Scholar

45.

S Sharma , S Bhatia , J Sharma , S Andotra , M Sudan , K Sharma. 2013. First record of Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), an invasive alien species on papaya (Carica papaya L.) in Jammu (J&K), India. Munis Entomology and Zoology 8: 664–671. Google Scholar

46.

MA Shekhar , JBN Kumar , BT Sreenivas , SH Divya. 2011. Papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus infesting mulberry in Karnataka. Insect Environment 16: 170–172. Google Scholar

47.

C Simon , F Frati , A Beckenbach , B Crespi , H Liu , P Flook. 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87: 651–701. Google Scholar

48.

M Suganthy , I Janaki , P Sakthivel. 2012. Biology of mealy bugs, Paracoccus marginatus (Williams and Granara de Willink) and Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley) on sunflower under greenhouse and laboratory. Madras Agricultural Journal 99: 371–373. Google Scholar

49.

S Suresh , R Jothimani , P Sivasubrmanian , P Karuppuchamy , R Samiyappan , EI Jonathan. 2010. Invasive mealybugs of Tamil Nadu and their management. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 23: 6–9. Google Scholar

50.

K Tamura , D Peterson , N Peterson , G Stecher , M Nei , S Kumar. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 2731–2739. Google Scholar

51.

R Tanwar , P Jeyakumar , S Vennila. 2010. Papaya Mealybug and its Management Strategies. NCIPM Technical Bulletin 22. National Centre for Integrated Pest Management, New Delhi, India. Google Scholar

52.

AR Templeton , KA Crandall , CF Sing. 1992. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132: 619–633. Google Scholar

53.

S Vennila , YG Prasad , M Prabhakar , M Agarwal , G Sreedevi , OM Bambawale. 2013. Weed hosts of cotton mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Journal of Environmental Biology 34: 153–158. Google Scholar

54.

S Vennila , YG Prasad , M Prabhakar , RKV Nagrare , M Amutha , Dharajyothi, M Agarwal , G Sreedewi , V Venkateswarlu , KR Kranthi , OM Bambawale . 2011. Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Host Plants of Cotton Mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley in India. NCIPM Technical Bulletin 26. National Centre for Integrated Pest Management, New Delhi, India. Google Scholar

55.

A Walker , M Hoy , D Meyerdirk. 2006. Papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus Williams and Granara de Willink (Insecta: Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). EENY-302. Featured Creatures. Entomology and Nematology Department and Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. Google Scholar

56.

DJ Williams , MCG de Willink. 1992. Mealybugs of Central and South America. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

57.

G Xin , L Zeng , X Hu , Y Lu , J Ma. 2011. Lethal effect of hot water on the mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley. Plant Quarantine 25: 1–5.  Google Scholar
Muhammad Z. Ahmed, Ri-Rong He, Mu-Tao Wu, Yu-Juan Gu, Jing-Mei Ren, Fan Liang, Hai-Lin Li, Xue-Nan Hu, Bao-Li Qiu, Catharine M. Mannion, and Jun Ma "First Report of the Papaya Mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), in China and Genetic Record for Its Recent Invasion in Asia and Africa," Florida Entomologist 98(4), 1157-1162, (1 December 2015). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.098.0420
Published: 1 December 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top