Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2011 Life history and other biological traits of the trout barb Capoeta trutta in the River Meymeh (western Iran)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The trout barb Capoeta trutta is native to the Middle East only and little is known of its life-history in Iranian waters. Life history characteristics were examined in 366 specimens collected from the River Meymeh (western Iran) monthly during the reproductive seasons (March-May) of 2008 and 2009. Observed maximum age was 6 years in both sexes, sex ratio (male : female) was 1 : 1.35, and length-weight relationships were TL = 0.0266TW2.7134(males), TL = 0.0258TW2.7251 (females), and TL = 0.026TW2.7217 (entire population). Mean egg diameter (ED) was 1.61 (± 0.03 SE), ranging from 1.6 to 1.9 mm. Mean absolute (AF) and relative fecundity (RF) were 7594 (± 283.04 SE) eggs/female, and 70 (± 241.86 SE) eggs·g-1 body weight, respectively. AF and ED were found to increase significantly with increasing fish size, whereas RF decreased significantly with both fish TL and weight. Simplified von Bertalanffy growth estimates were also calculated.

Introduction

The trout barb C. trutta (Heckel, 1843) is a cyprinid species native to the Middle East (Iran, Iraq, Syria and Turkey), encompassing much of the Iranian part of Tigris-Euphrates basin, including most tributaries of the River Karoun (Abdoli 2000). Compared with other species of Cyprinidae in western Iran, many aspects of the trout barb biology remain unstudied. Abdoli (2000) provided some information on the morphology and biology of this species, derived from a limited number of specimens. According to the IUCN classification, the species is listed in the category “DD” (data deficient). However, this species does not appear in need of conservation. Populations of this species are found in some lakes and rivers of Iraq (Coad 1991) and Turkey, where the species has received some studies (Polat 1987, Ünlü 1991, Gül et al. 1996, Kalkan 2008). Differences are known to occur in growth and reproductive features between the populations of same species living in different regions, and these differences are fundamental for understanding the species' life history patterns. In light of the climatic differences between the tributaries of Tigris-Euphrates basin, we hypothesized that the populations of this species inhabiting Iranian tributaries differ from those of the Turkey and Iraq in life history traits. Therefore, the aim of the present paper is to present the first detailed data on the growth and life-history traits of trout barb in the River Meymeh, which is one of the Iranian tributaries of Tigris-Euphrates basin.

Material and Methods

The River Meymeh (Table 1) is situated in the western Iranian province of South Ilam (latitude: 32°44' E; longitude: 47°09′ N, altitude: 208–2500 m) Afshin (1994). The reproductive period of the trout barb in eastern Iran is believed to extend from March to May (Abdoli 2000), so specimens were collected from middle parts of the river during these months in 2008 and 2009 using a small beach seine (30 m length, 2 m depth, knot to knot mesh size = 3 mm). All fish specimens were immediately preserved in 10 % formaldehyde solution for subsequent examination in the laboratory.

Table 1.

Average of some environmental factors (minmax.) for the River Meymeh (western Iran) (Cheraghi et al. 2007).

t01_153.gif

Fig. 1.

Total length (mm) frequency of males and females of trout barb C. trutta in the River Meymeh (western Iran).

f01_153.jpg

In the laboratory, all 366 specimens sampled were measured for total length (TL) as well as for total body (TW) and gonad weight (0.01 g). Age was determined from opercula taken from both sides, which were validated with scale and cleithra readings. Opercula were reviewed for banding patterns three times, each time by a different person using a binocular microscope under reflected light at 20–30×.

The relationship between the TL and TW was determined by fitting the data with the equation: TW = aTLb, where a is the intercept and b is the slope (coefficient of allometry) as per Pauly (1984). Age-specific TLs were estimated using the equation TLi = SiSc -1(TLc+ c, where TLi is TL of the fish at age i, TLc is the TL of the fish at capture, Si is the largest radius of the operculum at age i, Sc is the largest radius of the operculum at capture and c is the intercept of the regression of TL against operculum radii (Johal et al. 2001). The adopted growth model was the specialized von Bertalanffy growth function (VBGF), whose expression is: Lt = L(1 - e-k (t-to)) where L is the predicted asymptotic length, Lt is the size at age t, k is the instantaneous growth coefficient, and to is the point at which the von Bertalanffy curve intersects the age axis. The parameters were estimated using the method of Ford-Walford (Everhart & Youngs 1975) and phi-prime (Φ‘) was used to study overall growth performance (Munro & Pauly 1983): Φ‘ = Ink + 2lnL.

Fig. 2.

Relative growth curves (total length-total weight) of males, females and population of trout barb C. trutta in the River Meymeh (western Iran).

f02_153.jpg

Sex was determined by visual examination of the gonad tissue either by eye or with the aid of a stereomicroscope. Gonadosomatic index (GSI % = [gonad weight ÷ TW] × 100) was calculated for each fish and all the mean values was calculated for each sampling date. In order to estimate absolute (AF) and relative (RF) fecundities, the ovaries of 149 ripe females with maturity stage IV were used. Ovaries were removed, weighed and then placed in Gilson's fluid for 3-4 days to harden eggs and dissolve ovarian membranes. AF was estimated using the gravimetric method, using three pieces removed from anterior, medial and posterior of the ovary. RF was calculated as RF = AF/TW (Bagenal & Tesch 1978). Mean egg diameter was examined by measuring 25–30 eggs taken randomly from pieces of the ovary of 149 ripe females used for fecundity determination. Measurements were made to the nearest 0.05 mm with an ocular micrometer microscope.

Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed to test significance differences in weight-length relationships between sexes. The overall sex ratio was assessed using the chi-square test (Zar 1984). Comparison of GSI values between sexes was carried out by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS 11.5 software package and a significant level of 0.05 was accepted.

Table 2.

Mean observed (MO) and mean back-calculated (MBC) total lengths (cm) ± S.D. at age for males, females and population of trout barb C. trutta in the River Meymeh (western Iran).

t02_153.gif

Table 3.

Estimates of von Bertalanffy length-at-age growth parameters for males, females and population of trout barb C. trutta in the River Meymeh (western Iran).

t03_153.gif

Results

In the 366 specimens of the trout barb captured, maximum age in both sexes was age 6+, with males ranging from 11.3 to 31.5 cm TL and 16.93 to 347.10 g TW and females ranging from 10.5 to 34.7 cm TL and 13.91 to 358.42 g TW. The most frequent size class in the samples was 150-180 mm for males and 180-200 mm for females (Fig. 1). Males were so scare in the length classes > 300 mm TL. The overall sex ratio was 1 : 1.35, with females significantly more prevalent than males (χ2 = 7.97, P < 0.05).

Observed length-at-age differed between the sexes (Table 1), with females were longer and heavier than males (ANCOVA, FTL= 74.21, FTW= 92.01, P < 0.05). Length-weight relationships were significant with a high regression coefficient (Fig. 2). The coefficients of the calculated regressions were significantly different between each of considered groups. The slope b values indicate a negative pattern of allometric growth (t-test, t male = 6.82, tfemail = 8.02, tpopulation = 7.89, P < 0.05). From the mean back calculated TL values for each age group (Table 2), the von Bertalanffy growth model (Table 3) suggests that males grow faster than females (kfemail < kmale), whereas asymptotic total length was greater for females than for males.

GSI was significantly lower in males than in females (ANOVA, F1, 365 = 14.10, P < 0.05), with the highest mean value observed in April for both sexes: 4.667 ± 0.51 (SE) and 6.595 ± 0.99 (SE) for males and 7.602 ± 0.63 and 7.934 ± 0.53 (SE) for females, in 2008 and 2009 respectively. Spawning was first observed in May, so the reproductive period for this species in the River Meymeh is March to May.

Mean egg size was 1.61 (± 0.03 SE), with the majority of oocytes ranging from 1.6 to 1.9 mm (Fig. 3). Egg diameter was positively correlated with both TL and TW (Fig. 4). Minimum absolute fecundity (AF) was 1627 eggs, which was observed in an age 1+ female of 79.97 g, and maximum AF (18329 eggs) was observed in an age 6+ of 264.23 g. Mean AF was 7594 (± 283.04 SE) eggs per female. AF was found to increase significantly with increasing fish size (Fig. 5). Mean RF was 70 (± 241.86 SE), ranging from 14 to 242 eggs·g-1. RF was found to decrease significantly with both fish TL and TW (Fig. 6).

Fig. 3.

Size frequency distribution of the oocyte diameter of female trout barb C. trutta in the River Meymeh (western Iran).

f03_153.jpg

Fig. 4.

Relationship between ova diameter and total length (mm) and total weight (g) of female trout barb C. trutta in the River Meymeh (western Iran).

f04_153.jpg

Fig. 5.

Relationship between absolute fecundity and fish total length (mm) and total weight (g) of female trout barb C. trutta in the River Meymeh (western Iran).

f05_153.jpg

Fig. 6.

Relationship between relative fecundity and fish total weight (mm) and total length (g) of female trout barb C. trutta in the River Meymeh (western Iran).

f06_153.jpg

Discussion

Life-history variables of organisms are often known to vary among habitats and geographical locations, and the trout barb of the Tigris-Euphrates system of western Iran is no exception. Prior to the present study, no published data were available on the life history of this species in Iran, though information is available for some other Capoeta species (e.g. C. capoeta gracilis, C. damascina) in northern and central Iran. Therefore, comparisons are only possible with other Capoeta species and with trout barb populations in other countries.

As with other Capoeta species, trout barb was found to be reasonably fast growing and short lived (< 7+ years in both sexes), with females exhibiting a much wider range in length and a higher maximum length. Observed maximum age in the River Meymeh is lower than those reported in Turkish waters: 10+ in the River Tigris (Ünlü 1991), the Euphrates drainage (Gül et al. 1996), 7+ in the Karakaya Reservoir of the River Euphrates. Differences in maximum length are also observed between populations, with trout barb of the River Meymeh being smaller that those recorded in Turkey: 34.60 cm TL in the Keban Reservoir (Polat 1987), 36.6 cm TL in the Turkish Euphrates (Gül et al. 1996) and 37.70 cm TL in the Karakaya Reservoir (Kalkan 2008). Variations in maximum age and fish size can usually be explained by differences in food resource availability, individual growth rates, natural selection processes, and/or exploitation patterns. Because trout barb is not subject to commercial exploitation in the Meymeh basin, environmental conditions are the likely sources of the observed variations.

Trout barb growth is negatively allometric in the River Meymeh, with differences between males and females explainable by differences in the size distributions of the two sexes. In the River Meymeh population, the observed slope (b) values, which reflect the influence of local environmental factors on growth (Ismen 2005), differ from those found for the species in Karakaya Reservoir (Kalkan 2008), where positive allometric growth was reported for females (b = 3.03) and negative allometric growth for males (b = 2.93).

The estimated maximum length (L) values appear to be reasonable, given that the largest values reported for the species are 52.7 cm and 45.8 cm ( www.briancoad.com). A trade-off between growth rate (k) and maximum theoretical size (L) is often found, and this is usually explained by local environmental factors. The higher coefficient ‘k’ in males suggests that they undergo rapid early growth and approach their asymptotic length (L) earlier in life. This ‘front loading’ may explain in part the slight dominance of females in the trout barb of the River Meymeh, with higher survival rates amongst older females. In the Karakaya Reservoir (Turkey) the VBGF estimated sizes at age (Lt) were 76.40 in males and 89.5 in females (Kalkan 2008). Favourable environments result in reduced mortality and a shift toward larger maximum size (Dulcic et al. 2003), so the Karakaya Reservoir environment would appear to be a more favourable environment for trout barb than the River Meymeh. However, the estimated K and L values for Karakaya trout barb (Kalkan 2008) suggest similar growth performance to that observed in the River Meymeh.

The GSI values for trout barb than the River Meymeh indicate that the relative investment in reproduction by the two sexes is similar to that reported for the Karakaya Reservoir (Turkey), where a maximum GSI in females (7.91) was achieved in May (Kalkan 2008), slightly later than observed of the River Meymeh population. Even though differences in the timing of spawning has been reported for trout barb in Turkey (Polat 1987, Ünlü 1991, Gül et al. 1996, Kalkan 2008) and Iran (present study), it seems that reproductive investment by females (as expressed by GSI) is not significantly different among population, an important parameter in the reproductive strategy for this species.

Relative fecundity in the River Meymeh population of trout barb was lower than the mean value (666 eggs·g-1) for the species in Karakaya Reservoir, which reflects the greater maximum egg diameter (1.9 mm) observed in the River Meymeh population than reported for populations in Turkey: 1.03 mm in Keban Reservoir (Polat 1987), 1.38 mm in the River Tigris (Ünlü 1991), 1.20 mm in the River Euphrates (Gül et al. 1996), and 1.04 mm in Karakaya Reservoir (Kalkan 2008). Lower relative fecundity and larger ova suggests a higher energetic investment per egg in the River Meymeh population, and this increase with increasing female size (see Results). This is also evident in the minimum and maximum values for absolute fecundity (AF) compared with those reported ( www.briancoad.com) for the Turkish Euphrates (4713–18240 eggs), though trout barb in the River Meymeh demonstrated a wider range of AF values as well as an AF dependency on fish size. This indicates an increasing total energetic investment in reproduction with increasing fish, but the proportional energetic investment (i.e. energy allocation per unit of fish size) tends to be decreased with increasing in fish size.

In conclusion, the trout barb population in the River Meymeh differs in its life history traits relative to other populations, reflecting adaptations to the environmental conditions associated with the climate of western Iran. Future comparative studies are recommended in order to reveal the processes underlying adaptation in different habitats of distribution range.

Literature

1.

Abdoli A. 2000: The inland water fishes of Iran. Iranian Museum of Nature and Wildlife , Tehran . (in Persian with English summary) Google Scholar

2.

Afshin I. 1994: Rivers of Iran. Ministry of Energy of Iran publications , Tehran , ( in Persian) Google Scholar

3.

Bagenal T. & Tesch F. 1978: Methods for assessment of fish production in fresh waters, IBP Handbook 3. Blackwell , OxfordGoogle Scholar

4.

Cheraghi M., Khorasani N., Jafari M. & Mansouri S.M. 2007: Analysis of pollution sources in Meymeh River. J. Iran. Natural Res. 60: 193–201. ( in Persian with abstract in English ) Google Scholar

5.

Coad B.W. 1991: Fishes of Tigris Euphrates Basin: a critical checklist. Syllogeus, Ottawa, 68: 1–49. Google Scholar

6.

Coad B.W. 2010: Coa'ds personal website. The Canadian Museum of Nature , Ottawa, Canada ,  www.briancoad.com  Google Scholar

7.

Dulcic J., Pallaoro A., Cetinic P., Kraljevic M., Soldo A. & Jardas I. 2003: Age, growth and mortality of picarel, Spicara smaris L. (Pisces: Centracanthidae), from the eastern Adriatic (Croatian coast). J. Appl. Ichthyol. 19: 10–14. Google Scholar

8.

Everhart W.H. & Youngs W.D. 1975: Principles of fishery sciences. Cornell University Press, Ithaca , New YorkGoogle Scholar

9.

Gül A., Yılmaz M. & Solak K. 1996: Growth characteristics of Capoeta trutta (Heckel, 1843) living in Tohma stream of Firat River. Turk. J. Zool. 20 (Suppl): 177–185. ( in Turkish with English summary ) Google Scholar

10.

Ismen A. 2005: Age, growth and reproduction of the goldband goatfish, Upeneus moluccensis (Bleeker, 1855), in Iskenderun Bay, the Eastern Mediterranean. Turk. J. Zool 29: 301–309. Google Scholar

11.

Johal M.S., Esmaeili H.R. & Tandon K.K. 2001: A comparison of back-calculated lengths of silver carp derived from bony structures. J. Fish Biol 59: 1483–1493. Google Scholar

12.

Kalkan E. 2008: Growth and reproduction of Capoeta trutta (Heckel, 1843) in Karakaya Dam lake. Turk. J. Zool 32: 1–10. Google Scholar

13.

Munro J.L. & Pauly D. 1983: A simple method for comparing growth of fishes and invertebrates. ICLARM fishbyte 1: 5–6. Google Scholar

14.

Pauly D. 1984: Fish population dynamics in tropical waters: a manual for use for programmable calculators. ICLARM Studies and Reviews 8. Google Scholar

15.

Polat N. 1987: Age determination of Capoeta trutta (Heckel, 1843) in Keban Dam lake. Turk. J. Zool. 11: 155–160. Google Scholar

16.

Ünlü E. 1991: Investigation on the biological characteristics of Capoeta trutta (Heckel, 1843) living in Tigris River. Turk. J. Zool 15 (Suppl): 12–38. ( in Turkish with English summary ) Google Scholar

17.

Zar J.H. 1984: Biostatistical analysis. Englewoods Cliffs. N. J., Prentice Hall , New JersyGoogle Scholar
Rahman Patimar and Saeid Farzi "Life history and other biological traits of the trout barb Capoeta trutta in the River Meymeh (western Iran)," Folia Zoologica 60(2), 153-158, (1 June 2011). https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.v60.i2.a9.2011
Received: 23 April 2010; Accepted: 1 September 2010; Published: 1 June 2011
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top