Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2014 Body condition variation of wild rabbit population in the north-east Mediterranean island of Lemnos — Greece
Vasileios J. Kontsiotis, Dimitrios E. Bakaloudis, Apostolos C. Tsiompanoudis, Panteleimon Xofis
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

European wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) is a widely distributed species with a multiple role in both environmental sustainability and local economy. In the current study we examine the body condition of the species in relation to habitat type, age, sex and seasonality on the island of Lemnos. Body condition was assessed based on a visual estimation of the amount of abdominal fat. A high intra-annual variation in the body condition of the species has been observed, which is further affected by sex and age. The species appears to conserve and maintain high levels of energy reserves for two main reasons. The first is to ensure a better reproductive success, as expressed by the relatively high amount of stored fat reserves at the onset of breeding season, and their depletion during it. The second is to ensure survival during periods where the shortage of food creates a rather hostile environment, as expressed by the increased level of reserves during summer and their dramatic decrease from late summer until autumn. The temporal fluctuation in energy reserves differs between male and female rabbits, reflecting their temporally different energy demands. Further, differences in body conditions were observed between juvenile and adult individuals, reflecting their different needs in terms of body growth and maintenance. Our results could offer important insights for the development of a time specific management plan and measures to ensure either the control of the population or its conservation.

Introduction

The wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) is a widely distributed small-sized mammal with a great ecological adaptability in varying environments and habitat types (Flux 1994). It constitutes a key prey species for predators and an important game (Delibes-Mateos et al. 2007, 2008), while it contributes to the increased heterogeneity and biodiversity of Mediterranean pastures (Gálvez-Bravo et al. 2011). However, in many Mediterranean islands it is considered an invader and pest (Courchamp et al. 2003), competing with local wild fauna and livestock, causing destruction in soils and cultivations, and negatively affecting local biodiversity (Lees & Bell 2008).

On the island of Lemnos, rabbits were probably introduced since the antiquity by Phoenicians and/ or Romans (Gibb 1990, Flux 1994), and no conflicts between them and the local economic activities, such as agriculture, were recorded until the 1990s, when a rabbit population increase was observed (Kontsiotis et al. 2013a). After continuous allegations by local farmers, the Hellenic Organization of Agricultural Insurances (ELGA) launched a compensation scheme in 2007 for wild rabbit damages to crops (ELGA 2007). The increased need for management of wild rabbits on Lemnos and in most parts of its range, requires the in depth knowledge of its physiology and ecology.

Information for demographic process and animal-habitat interactions can arise from the assessment of animal's body condition (Huot et al. 1995, Gaston et al. 2001), providing an important tool in the designing and implementation of management plans. In wild fauna, fat storage is usually used as a body condition index (Blem 1990, Batzli & Esseks 1992) and it is considered an important determinant of fitness, behaviour, vigour, survival and reproductive success (Hodges et al. 2006, Peig & Green 2009, Cabezas et al. 2011). It constitutes a fundamental source of endogenous energy for many mammals and birds (Blem 1990, Robbins 1993). Boos et al. (2005) demonstrated that reproductive success, intraspecific competition and other aspects of wild rabbit's population dynamics are linked to its body condition. Rödel et al. (2004) suggested that body condition of sub-adult individuals determines to a large degree the likelihood of their overwintering survival.

Body condition can be affected by many environmental factors including rainfall amount and ambient temperature (Seltmann et al. 2009), landscape fragmentation (Hewison et al. 2009), soil quality (Klein & Strandgaard 1972) and topography (Mysterud et al. 2001). Subsequently, habitat selection can largely determine the body condition of terrestrial mammals (Fisher et al. 2011).

Endogenous factors such as sex and age have also been reported to affect body condition. In female mammals body condition seems to notably affect reproductive success; e.g. both litter size and neonatal mass increase with body condition (Atkinson & Ramsay 1995, Dobson & Michener 1995, Wauters & Dhondt 1995). Prendergast & Jensen (2012) suggested that body fat decreases as number of carried embryos increases in muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus), demonstrating the importance of fat reserves in reproduction, especially for mammals producing multiple litters annually. For wild rabbits in particular, Rödel et al. (2005) suggested that a good body condition is essential for the onset of breeding. Boyd & Myhill (1987) observed a reduction in body fat reserves during reproduction for both sexes, while similar results were reported by Parer & Libke (1991) during breeding and lactation for females. Furthermore, Boussès & Chapuis (1998) documented the high energetic cost of increasing testes size and production of androgens by males.

According to Boss et al. (2005), age may significantly affect body mass lipids. Rödel & von Holst (2008) suggested that sub-adult wild rabbits have a lower body mass than adults and a subsequent disadvantage in surviving under adverse environmental conditions. Furthermore, Wallage-Drees & Deinum (1986) suggested that high body mass is related to high fat reserves, and as a result significant differences in body condition are expected between individuals of different age.

Despite the high importance of body condition in population dynamics there is still limited information on its annual variation, especially in insular and seasonal environments. Furthermore, there is still a discrepancy over the differences in body condition between sexes, across their annual cycle (Boyd & Myhill 1987, Parer & Libke 1991). The aim of the current study was to investigate the variation in body condition in relation to habitat, season, sex and age in the wild rabbit population of a typical Mediterranean island. These factors are expected to have a significant impact on body condition due to the induced differences in food availability, reproductive status, nutritional demands and growth tradeoffs. Our results are expected to provide useful insights for the sound management of the species.

Material and Methods

Study area

The study was conducted on Lemnos island (475.6 km2) (39°46′–40°02′ N, 25°02′–25°26′ E), in the north Aegean Sea. The island is dominated by plain areas, and only on its western part low hills of up to 430 m a.s.l. can be found. The climate is typical Mediterranean, with very hot and dry summers and mild winter (average annual temperature is 15.9 °C and average annual precipitation is 474 mm).

The main habitat types dominating the island are phrygana and agricultural cultivations. Phrygana are composed primarily by Sarcopoterium spinosum, Thymus capitatus, Centaurea spinosa, Genista acanthoclada and Anthyllis hermannia while agricultural crops are mainly cereals and vineyards. In order to study the annual variation in body condition one representative site of 100 ha for each habitat type was selected. Each site was located in the center of a wider area covered by the same habitat type in order to avoid population interactions, while the horizontal distance between them was 13 km. The location of each site was selected based on the internal homogeneity as well as on the homogeneity of the surrounding area. The agricultural site was located in the central and the phryganic on the southeastern part of the island (Fig. 1).

Methods

Data collection was carried out between February 2007 and January 2008. The study was performed by postmortem analysis on 360 wild rabbits (15 samples per month per habitat) of which 175 were males and 185 females. Spotlight shooting was the method employed for sample collection, after acquiring the necessary authorization by the Hellenic Ministry of Rural Development and Food. Only individuals with a, visually assessed, large body size (≥ 900 g), were targeted avoiding the just emergent. Immediately after shooting, each wild rabbit was placed in a plastic bag, in order to avoid any water loss due to bleeding and dehydration (Boos et al. 2005). Within three hours of their collection, rabbits were weighed (intact body mass, ± 1 g), and their body length, from the nose to the last caudal vertebra (± 1 mm), was measured. Eyes were removed and placed in 10 % formalin for at least 48 h while the rest of the body was frozen at -18 °C. The eye lenses were then removed and ovendried at 85 °C for 72 h and weighed to the nearest milligram. The mean weight for each pair of lenses was calculated and used to determine the individual's age using the Myers & Gilbert (1968) formula: age (days) = -57 + 181.4/loge [314/lens wt (mg)].

Fig. 1.

Orientation map of the Lemnos island and location of studied habitats. Circle indicates the agricultural site and triangle indicates the phryganic site.

f01_87.jpg

Rabbits were classified into two age classes, namely juveniles (below four months old) and adults. The 24 individuals that had damaged eye lens, due to shooting, were classified based on their weight, with those above 1200 g classified as adults and the rest as juveniles (King et al. 1983). After thawing, wild rabbits were sexed optically and their body condition was estimated according to their abdominal fat on a 4-scale classification (Fraser 1988): 1stclass: no abdominal fat, 2nd class: restricted fat around the kidneys, 3rd class: modest fat around the kidneys which spreads several cm along the abdominal wall, 4th class: large amounts of fat which almost covers the kidneys and expands to thick layers around the stomach and small intestines. The reproductive status of males was assessed based on the position (abdominal or scrotal) and weight of testes. The testes were excised, separated from the epididymides and weighted at the nearest 0.01 g. Individuals with at least one testis in the scrotal position or those with testes weight exceeding 2 g were considered as fertile (Bell 1986, Vandewalle 1989, Parer & Libke 1991, Boussès & Chapuis 1998). Female reproductive status was determined by evidence of pregnancy and/or lactation (Fraser 1988, Gonçalves et al. 2002). Pregnancy was assessed by the presence of implanted embryos or the presence of placental scars, while lactation was assessed by inspecting the mammary gland development.

We conducted seasonal vegetation inventories in each habitat type (agricultural and phryganic) in order to quantify the availability of green vegetation, which constitutes the main food source. Vegetation cover was estimated using line-point intercepts (Cook & Stubbendieck 1986, Elzinga et al. 1998) along five, randomly located, 25 m linear transects on each site, and expressed as percentage cover (%). Points were spaced at 0.25 m apart within line transects, and a total of 500 points were sampled per season and habitat type.

Statistical analysis

Differences in body condition between sexes, habitat types and among the four seasons (spring: March–May, summer: June–August, autumn: September–November and winter: from December to February), on adult wild rabbits only, were tested using hierarchical log-linear model analysis. The number of variables included in the analysis was restricted due to the sample size limitation of log-linear analysis (Knoke & Burke 1980). Log-linear analysis was also employed in order to identify differences in body condition between adult and juveniles and between the two habitat types. The variable season was not included in this case because the sample size was smaller as a result of our attempt to include an equal number of adults and juveniles per month. In both cases, the full model showed a good fit to the data and the technique of backward elimination was followed until the final model was selected (Sokal & Rohlf 1995). Finally, we employed the non-parametric Friedman's statistical test to detect differences in cover of green vegetation among seasons (Friedman 1937), while the Wilcoxon test (Wilcoxon 1945), was employed for post-hoc comparisons between the four seasons.

Results

Among the 360 collected individuals, 72 were juveniles and 288 were adults. Most juveniles were collected in spring and summer, 22 and 35 respectively, while 12 and three were collected in autumn and winter respectively.

According to their body condition, most wild rabbits of the total sample were mounted in the 1st class (45.3 %), which followed in descending order by the 2nd (29.2 %), 3rd (14.4 %) and 4th class (11.1 %).

For the adult wild rabbits, the hierarchical log-linear analysis of the full model included the four body condition classes as dependent variable and the four seasons, two habitat types, two sexes and their interactions as independent variables. The full model showed a good fit to the data (G2 = 7.071, df = 9, P = 0.630), while following the technique of backward elimination the final model revealed that the variation in body condition can be explained by the interaction of season and sex only (G2 = 33.112, df = 32, P = 0.413; Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Monthly fluctuation of the body condition (Mean ± SE) of adult male and female wild rabbits.

f02_87.jpg

In the second analysis, where differences in body condition between adults and juveniles in the two habitat types were tested, the full model showed a good fit to the data (G2 = 0.269, df = 3, P = 0.966), and after backward elimination, body condition was found to significantly differ between juveniles and adults, independently of the habitat type (G2 = 5.887, df = 8, P = 0.660; Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Seasonal fluctuation of the body condition (Mean ± SE) of adult and juvenile wild rabbits.

f03_87.jpg

Since habitat type was not found to significantly affect body condition, the analysis of reproductive status and green vegetation cover was not done separately for each habitat. Testes size was found to vary considerably across the annual cycle, maximizing in winter, with testes weight reaching almost 3 g, and minimizing during summer with testes weight of less than 1 g. The reproductive period begins in December and ends in June (Fig. 4), with the main reproductive period falling between February and May. Lactating period, on the other hand, begins in January and ends in August.

Significant differences between seasons were found in the pattern of green vegetation cover (P < 0.001; Fig. 5). Green vegetation maximizes in spring, exceeding a cover of 80 %, and it drops significantly from summer to autumn where it falls below 40 % cover. In winter it recovers as a result of the onset of wet season from late October.

Fig. 4.

Frequency of pregnancy and lactation of female, and fertility of male wild rabbits from both habitat types.

f04_87.jpg

Fig. 5.

Seasonal percentage covers of green vegetation (Mean ± SE). Different letters inside the columns indicates statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).

f05_87.jpg

Discussion

The results presented above conform to our hypothesis that body condition varies seasonally, between sexes and between age classes. This is probably due to differences in energy needs between individuals of different age and sex and the seasonal differences in the availability of external energy sources. The absence of a habitat effect on body condition was rather unexpected but it could be explained by the dietary flexibility of the species and its ability to exploit a wide range of food resources (Rödel 2005). Since the viability of a population depends on successful reproduction and survival during harsh conditions, a successful survival strategy should ensure a body condition suitable to overcome those critical parts of a life cycle.

Body condition exhibits a high seasonal fluctuation, with a significantly different pattern between sexes. It is at its lowest level from March to May, for both sexes, which falls within the main reproductive period. Boyd & Myhill (1987), studying wild rabbits population in UK, reported the same findings demonstrating a reduction of the fat reserves during the breeding season, while in females the steepest decline occurs when exhibit greater productivity.

From May, male rabbits begin to recover the lost body fat by exploiting the available food resources and they reach the optimum body condition by June, remaining high until August. The maintenance of high levels of reserved fat during the summer period, where available food resources are decreasing, is attributed to the fact that during this period they are decreasing the size of testes, dropping their metabolic rate and avoiding energy demanding activities such as sexual displays and competitive behavior (Slater 1978, Clutton-Brock & Albon 1979, Vehrencamps et al. 1989). Maintaining high levels of reserved fat during this period is critical, both to ensure survival during the harsh, in terms of food availability, conditions in late summer and autumn, as well as to ensure a better chance of success in the next breeding season (Boussès & Chapuis 1998).

The process of recovering the lost fat reserves in female rabbits, on the other hand, is much slower. Female rabbits consume reserved fat both during pregnancy and lactation (Bonanno et al. 2008, Brecchia et al. 2008), which is completed by June for the great majority of the individuals. Soon after, they start recovering their energy reserves (Dal Bosco et al. 2007), reaching the optimum body condition by August. Although from early summer food availability begins to be decreasing, the dietary flexibility of the species and the ability to browse the most qualitative food resources (Rödel 2005) allows it to restore fat reserves during summer. Armitage (1998), studying yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris), reported similar differences in the recovery of fat reserves between males and females, attributing it to the higher energetic stress of the latter due to lactation. From late summer (August) the body condition of both sexes drops dramatically until November in males and until December in females. Late summer and early-mid autumn coincides with the period of the lowest availability of food resources, which forces the rabbits to utilize part of the reserved fat. When wet season begins at mid-late October, male rabbits exploit the onset of the new vegetative period and begin to restore some of the fat reserves, preparing themselves for the following breeding season. However, despite the tendency to restore lost fat reserves, their body condition does not dramatically improve. This is probably due to the fact that during late autumn and winter males consume large amounts of energy in competitive activities and physiological changes, such as increasing testes size and spermatogenesis (Gonçalves et al. 2002).

Female rabbits, however, appear to have low fat reserves in December, although they can also exploit the onset of the new vegetative period. This can possibly be attributed to the fact that some of the sampled females may have got pregnant and given birth during late October and November. The phenomenon of a breeding season soon after the first autumn rains has also been observed by Gonçalves et al. (2002). In the current study this phenomenon is further confirmed by the presence of juveniles in the sample collected in January (10 %). Apparently the sampling intensity was not high enough to allow collection of pregnant females during October and November which would validate our assumption. In February, female rabbits appear to have restored the energy reserves and they are ready for entering the main breeding season. At this stage females store much higher amounts of fat than males, since a better physical condition ensures both a higher hierarchical ranking in their society and better chances of survival for their off-springs (von Holst et al. 2002).

Differences in body condition were also found between adults and juveniles. Similarly to the results reported by Wallage-Drees & Deinum (1986), our findings show that juveniles store much smaller amounts of fat than adults throughout the year. Juvenile and adult wild rabbits have different nutritional and energy requirements, since adults need them for maintenance and reproduction, whereas juveniles invest the acquired nutrients and energy in their body growth (Arenz & Leger 2000). In addition, young rabbits exhibit a higher temperature regulation costs (Rödel 2005), while their displacement by dominant males from the colony areas (von Holst et al. 1999) increases their social stress, leading to additional energy requirements (Rödel 2005). Consequently, juveniles appear to have limited amounts of excess energy to be stored as fat.

The understanding of the physiological status of a population along the annual cycle provides useful insights when management measures are planned. Apparently, the relatively poor body condition observed during autumn would make the population much more vulnerable to measures related to population control, such as poisoned bait, capture and hunting. Although the effect of hunting was not explicitly studied in the current study we tend to agree with the findings by Angulo & Villafuerte (2003) who suggest that autumn hunting may have a higher impact on population numbers. The imperative need for food, in order to survive during periods of poor food availability, and the reduced fat reserves would increase the consumption of bait and increase the vulnerability to hunting as a result of a prolonged browsing time and extended browsing area (Newman 2007). On the other hand, when population conservation is aimed, then measures such as food provision or habitat improvement would be more effective during periods with poor physiological condition or when they need to build up body reserves in periods of food scarcity. The lack of fat reserves in this lean mammal could threaten its survival (Boos et al. 2005), especially in periods of extremely low food availability (Kontsiotis et al. 2013b). However, further research is needed to determine the optimum time of applying population management measures, since their effectiveness is affected by the population structure, the rabbit's seasonal behavior patterns, the hunting habits etc. (Daly 1980, Williams et al. 1995, Calvete et al. 2005).

Acknowledgements

This research is part of a PhD thesis, and supported partly financially by the Prefecture of Lesbos. Thanks are given to Professors N. Papageorgiou, C. Vlachos and V. Papanastasis for their valuable comments during this research. We also thank the three anonymous reviewers for their valuable and fruitful comments. The Ministry of Rural Development and Food is also acknowledged for the permission to collect data. The study was conducted according to the Greek and EU laws.

Literature

1.

Angulo E. & Villafuerte R. 2003: Modelling hunting strategies for the conservation of wild rabbit populations. Biol. Conserv. 115: 291–301.  Google Scholar

2.

Arenz C.L. & Leger D.W. 2000: Antipredator vigilance of juvenile and adult thirteen-lined ground squirrels and the role of nutritional need. Anim. Behav. 59: 535–541.  Google Scholar

3.

Armitage K.B. 1998: Reproductive strategies of yellow-bellied marmots: energy conservation and differences between the sexes. J. Mammal. 79: 385–393.  Google Scholar

4.

Atkinson S.N. & Ramsay M.A. 1995: The effects of prolonged fasting of the body composition and reproductive success of female polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Funct. Ecol. 9: 559–567.  Google Scholar

5.

Batzli G.O. & Esseks E. 1992: Body fat as an indicator of nutritional condition for the brown lemming. J. Mammal. 73: 431–439.  Google Scholar

6.

Bell D.J. 1986: Social effects on physiology in the European rabbit. Mammal Rev. 16: 131–137.  Google Scholar

7.

Blem C.R. 1990: Avian energy storage. In: Power D.M. (ed.), Current ornithology. Plenum Press , New York : 59–113. Google Scholar

8.

Bonanno A., Mazza F., Di Grigoli A. & Alicata M.L. 2008: Body condition score and related productive responses in rabbit does. In: Xiccato G., Trocino A. & Lukefahr S.D. (eds.), 9th World Rabbit Congress. Verona—Italy : 297–301. Google Scholar

9.

Boos M., Thouzeau C., Delacour G., Artois M., Marchandeau S., Jean-Claude P. & Robin J.-P. 2005: Body condition assessment and prediction of fasting endurance in wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Wildlife Res. 32: 75–83.  Google Scholar

10.

Boussès P. & Chapuis J.L. 1998: Deferred seasonal increase in testes weight under poor nutritional conditions in a sub-Antarctic population of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). J. Zool. (Lond.) 245: 285–291.  Google Scholar

11.

Boyd I.L. & Myhill D.G. 1987: Seasonal changes in condition, reproduction and fecundity in the wild European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). J. Zool. (Lond.) 212: 223–233.  Google Scholar

12.

Brecchia G., Cardinali R., Dal Bosco A., Boiti C. & Castellini C. 2008: Effect of reproductive rhythm based on rabbit doe body condition on fertility and hormones. In: Xiccato G., Trocino A. & Lukefahr S.D. (eds.), 9th World Rabbit Congress. Verona—Italy : 309–313. Google Scholar

13.

Cabezas S., Calvete C. & Moreno S. 2011: Survival of translocated wild rabbits: importance of habitat, physiological and immune condition. Anim. Conserv. 14: 665–675.  Google Scholar

14.

Calvete C., Angulo E. & Estrada R. 2005: Conservation of the European wild rabbit populations when hunting is age and sex selective. Biol. Conserv. 121: 623–634.  Google Scholar

15.

Clutton-Brock T.H. & Albon S.D. 1979: The roaring of red deer and the evolution of honest advertisement. Behaviour 69: 145–170.  Google Scholar

16.

Cook W.C. & Stubbendieck J. 1986: Range research: basic problems and techniques. Society for Range Management , Denver, Colorado, USAGoogle Scholar

17.

Courchamp F., Chapuis J.-L. & Pascal M. 2003: Mammal invaders on islands: impact, control and control impact. Biol. Rev. 78: 347–383.  Google Scholar

18.

Dal Bosco A., Cardinali R., Mugnai C. & Castellini C. 2007: Assessment of a reproduction rhythm based on the body condition of rabbit doe: preliminary results. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 6: 764.  Google Scholar

19.

Daly J.C. 1980: Age, sex and season: factors wich determine the trap response of the European wild rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus. Aust. Widlife Res. 7: 421–432.  Google Scholar

20.

Delibes-Mateos M., Delibes M., Ferreras P. & Villafuerte R. 2008: Key role of European rabbits in the conservation of the western Mediterranean basin hotspot. Conserv. Biol. 22: 1106–1117.  Google Scholar

21.

Delibes-Mateos M., Redpath S.M., Angulo E., Ferreras P. & Villafuerte R. 2007: Rabbits as a keystone species in southern Europe. Biol. Conserv. 137: 149–156.  Google Scholar

22.

Dobson F.S. & Michener G.R. 1995: Maternal traits and reproduction in Richardson's ground squirrels. Ecology 76: 851–862.  Google Scholar

23.

ELGA 2007: Compensation statistical data for 2007. Greek Agricultural Insurance Organization, Athens, accessed 10 December 2013.  http://www.elga.gr/index.php?option=com_phocadown load&view=category&id=16&Itemid=103  Google Scholar

24.

Elzinga C.L., Salzer D.W. & Willoughby J.W. 1998: Measuring and monitoring plant populations. Denver : USDI BLM Technical Reference 1730-1, National Business Center CO.  Google Scholar

25.

Fisher J.T., Anholt B. & Volpe J.P. 2011: Body mass explains characteristic scales of habitat selection in terrestrial mammals. Ecol. Evol. 1: 517–528.  Google Scholar

26.

Flux J.E.C. 1994: World distribution. In: Thompson H.V. & King C.M. (eds.), The European rabbit — the history and biology of a successful colonizer. Oxford University Press , UK : 8–21. Google Scholar

27.

Fraser K.W. 1988: Reproductive biology of rabbits, Oryctolagus cuniculus (L.) in central Otago, New Zealand. New Zeal. J. Ecol. 11: 79–88.  Google Scholar

28.

Friedman M. 1937: The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J. Am. St. Assoc. 32: 675–701.  Google Scholar

29.

Gálvez-Bravo L., López-Pintor A., Rebollo S. & Gómez-Sal A. 2011: European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) engineering effects promote plant heterogeneity in Mediterranean dehesa pastures. J. Arid Environ. 75: 779–786.  Google Scholar

30.

Gaston K.J., Chown S.L. & Mercer R.D. 2001 : The animal species body size distribution of Marion Island. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 14493–14496.  Google Scholar

31.

Gibb J.A. 1990: The European rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus. In: Chapman J.A. & Flux J.E.C. (eds.), Rabbits, hares and pikas — status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Lagomorph Specialist Group , Oxford, UK : 116–120. Google Scholar

32.

Gonçalves H., Alves P.C. & Rocha A. 2002: Seasonal variation in the reproductive activity of the wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus algirus) in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Wildlife Res. 29: 165–173.  Google Scholar

33.

Hewison A.J.M., Morellet N., Verheyden H., Daufresne T., Angibault J.-M., Cargnelutti B., Merlet J., Picot D., Rames J.-L., Joachim J., Lourtet B., Serrano E., Bideau E. & Cebe N. 2009: Landscape fragmentation influences winter body mass of roe deer. Ecography 32: 1062–1070.  Google Scholar

34.

Hodges K.E., Boonstra R. & Krebs C.J. 2006: Overwinter mass loss of snowshoe hares in the Yukon: starvation, stress, adaptation or artefact? J. Anim. Ecol. 75: 1–13.  Google Scholar

35.

Huot J., Poulie M.-L. & Crête M. 1995: Evaluation of several indices for assessment of coyote (Canis lastrans) body composition. Can. J. Zool. 73: 1620–1624.  Google Scholar

36.

King D.R., Wheeler S.H. & Schmidt G.L. 1983: Population fluctuations and reproduction of rabbits in a pastoral area on the coast north of Carnarvon, W.A. Aust. Wildlife Res. 10: 97–104.  Google Scholar

37.

Klein D. & Strandgaard H. 1972: Factors affecting growth and body size of roe deer. J. Wildlife Manage. 36: 64–79.  Google Scholar

38.

Knoke D. & Burke P.J. 1980: Log-linear models. Sage Publications, Inc. Newbury Park , CaliforniaGoogle Scholar

39.

Kontsiotis V.J., Bakaloudis D.E. & Tsiompanoudis A.C. 2013b: Key factors determining the seasonal population growth rate of European wild rabbits and their implications for management. Eur. J. Wildlife Res. 59: 495–503.  Google Scholar

40.

Kontsiotis V. J., Bakaloudis D.E., Xofis P., Konstantaras N., Petrakis N. & Tsiompanoudis A.C. 2013a: Modeling the distribution of wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) on a Mediterranean island. Ecol. Res. 28: 317–325.  Google Scholar

41.

Lees A.C. & Bell D.J. 2008: A conservation paradox for the 21st century: the European wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus), an invasive alien and an endangered native species. Mammal Rev. 38: 304–320.  Google Scholar

42.

Myers K. & Gilbert N. 1968: Determination of age of wild rabbits in Australia. J. Wildlife Manage. 32: 841–849.  Google Scholar

43.

Mysterud A., Langvatn R., Yoccoz N.G. & Stenseth N.C. 2001: Plant phenology, migration and geographical variation in body weight of a large herbivore: the effect of a variable topography. J. Anim. Ecol. 70: 915–923.  Google Scholar

44.

Newman J. 2007: Herbivory. In: Stephens D.W., Brown J.S. & Ydenberg R.C. (eds.), Foraging behavior and ecology. University of Chicago Press , Chicago : 175–218. Google Scholar

45.

Parer I. & Libke J.A. 1991: Biology of the wild rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus (L.), in the southern tablelands of New South Wales. Widlife Res. 18: 237–241.  Google Scholar

46.

Peig J. & Green A. J. 2009: New perspectives for estimating body condition from mass/length data: the scaled mass index as an alternative method. Oikos 118: 1883–1891.  Google Scholar

47.

Prendergast J.A. & Jensen W.E. 2012: Relation between reproduction and fat reserves in female muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus). Mammalia 76: 219–221.  Google Scholar

48.

Robbins C.T. 1993: Wildlife feeding and nutrition. Academic Press , San DiegoGoogle Scholar

49.

Rödel H.G. 2005: Winter feeding behaviour of European rabbits in a temperate zone habitat. Mamm. Biol. 70: 300–306.  Google Scholar

50.

Rödel H.G., Bora A., Kaetzke P., Khaschei M., Hutzelmeyer H. & von Holst D. 2004: Over-winter survival in subadult European rabbits: weather effects, density-dependence, and the impact of individual characteristics. Oecologia 140: 566–576.  Google Scholar

51.

Rödel H.G., Bora A., Kaetzke P., Khaschei M., Hutzelmeyer H., Zapka M. & von Holst D. 2005: Timing of breeding and reproductive performance of female European rabbits in response to winter temperature and body mass. Can. J. Zool. 83: 935–942.  Google Scholar

52.

Rödel H.G. & von Holst D. 2008: Weather effects on reproduction, survival and body mass of European rabbits in a temperate zone habitat. In: Alves P.C., Ferrand N.M. & Hackländer K. (eds.), Lagomorph biology. Evolution, ecology, and conservation. Springer Verlag , Berlin : 115–124. Google Scholar

53.

Seltmann M.W., Ruf T. & Rödel H.G. 2009: Effects of body mass and huddling on resting metabolic rates of post-weaned European rabbits under different simulated weather conditions. Funct. Ecol. 23: 1070–1080.  Google Scholar

54.

Slater P.J.B. 1978: Sex hormones and behaviour. Stud. Biol. 103: 1–56.  Google Scholar

55.

Sokal R.R. & Rohlf F.J. 1995: Biometry — the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W.H. Freeman and Company , New YorkGoogle Scholar

56.

Vandewalle P. 1989: Le cycle reproducter du lapin de garenne (Oryctolagus cuniculus) en Camargue: influence des facteurs environnementaux. Gibier Faune Sauvage 6: 1–25.  Google Scholar

57.

Vehrencamps S.L., Bradbury J.W. & Gibson R.M. 1989: The energetic cost of display in male sage grouse. Anim. Behav. 38: 885–896.  Google Scholar

58.

von Holst D., Hutzelmeyer H., Kaetzke P., Khaschei M., Rödel H.G. & Schrutka H. 2002: Social rank, fecundity and lifetime reproductive success in wild European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 51: 245–254.  Google Scholar

59.

von Holst D., Hutzelmeyer H., Kaetzke P., Kaschei M. & Schönheiter R. 1999: Social rank, stress, fitness, and life expectancy in wild rabbits. Naturwissenschaften 86: 388–393.  Google Scholar

60.

Wallage-Drees J.M. & Deinum B. 1986: Quality of the diet selected by wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.) in autumn and winter. Neth. J. Zool. 36: 438–448.  Google Scholar

61.

Wauters L.A. & Dhondt A.A. 1995: Life time reproductive success and its correlates in female Eurasian red squirrels. Oikos 72: 402–410.  Google Scholar

62.

Wilcoxon F. 1945: Individual comparison by ranking methods. Biometrics 1: 80–83.  Google Scholar

63.

Williams K., Parer I., Coman B., Burley J. & Braysher M. 1995: Managing vertebrate pests: rabbits. Australian Government Publishing Service , CanberraGoogle Scholar
Vasileios J. Kontsiotis, Dimitrios E. Bakaloudis, Apostolos C. Tsiompanoudis, and Panteleimon Xofis "Body condition variation of wild rabbit population in the north-east Mediterranean island of Lemnos — Greece," Folia Zoologica 63(2), 87-94, (1 July 2014). https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.v63.i2.a6.2014
Received: 22 September 2013; Accepted: 1 March 2014; Published: 1 July 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
energy reserves
European wild rabbit
fat storage
management
Mediterranean environment
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top