Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2016 Automatic Delineation of Seacliff Limits using Lidar-derived High-resolution DEMs in Southern California
Monica Palaseanu-Lovejoy, Jeff Danielson, Cindy Thatcher, Amy Foxgrover, Patrick Barnard, John Brock, Adam Young
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Palaseanu-Lovejoy, M.; Danielson, J.; Thatcher, C.; Foxgrover, A.; Barnard, P.; Brock, J., and Young, A., 2016. Automatic delineation of seacliff limits using lidar-derived high-resolution DEMs in Southern California. In: Brock, J.C.; Gesch, D.B.; Parrish, C.E.; Rogers, J.N., and Wright, C.W. (eds.), Advances in Topobathymetric Mapping, Models, and Applications. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue, No. 76, pp. 162–173. Coconut Creek (Florida), ISSN 0749-0208.

Seacliff erosion is a serious hazard with implications for coastal management and is often estimated using successive hand-digitized cliff tops or bases (toe) to assess cliff retreat. Even if efforts are made to standardize manual digitizing and eliminate subjectivity, the delineation of cliffs is time-consuming and depends on the analyst's interpretation. An automatic procedure is proposed to extract cliff edges from high-resolution lidar-derived bare-earth digital elevation models, generalized coastal shoreline vectors, and approximate measurements of distance between the shoreline and the cliff top. The method generates orthogonal transects and profiles with a minimum spacing equal to the digital elevation model resolution. The method also extracts the xyz coordinates for each profile for the cliff top and toe, as well as second major inflections along the profile. Over 75% of the automated cliff top points and 78% of the toe automated points are within 95% confidence interval of the hand-digitized top and toe lines, and over 79% of the digitized top points and 84% of the digitized toe points are within the 95% confidence interval of the automated top and toe lines along a stretch of coast in Del Mar, California. Outlier errors were caused by either the failure to remove all vegetation from the bare-earth digital elevation model or errors of interpretation. The automatic method was further applied between Point Conception and Los Angeles Harbor, California. This automatic method is repeatable, takes advantage of detailed topographic information within high-resolution digital elevation models, and is more efficient than hand-digitizing.

©Coastal Education and Research Foundation, Inc. 2016
Monica Palaseanu-Lovejoy, Jeff Danielson, Cindy Thatcher, Amy Foxgrover, Patrick Barnard, John Brock, and Adam Young "Automatic Delineation of Seacliff Limits using Lidar-derived High-resolution DEMs in Southern California," Journal of Coastal Research 76(sp1), 162-173, (1 December 2016). https://doi.org/10.2112/SI76-014
Received: 25 March 2015; Accepted: 17 July 2015; Published: 1 December 2016
KEYWORDS
automatic procedures
cliff limits
DEM
LIDAR
seacliffs
southern California
Back to Top