Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
19 October 2020 Spatial Distribution of Whitefly Species (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and Identification of Secondary Bacterial Endosymbionts in Tomato Fields in Costa Rica
Xareni Can-Vargas, Natalia Barboza, Eric J. Fuchs, Eduardo J. Hernández
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

In Costa Rica, tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Linnaeus) Linnaeus (Solanales: Solanaceae) is one of the crops most severely affected by the whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) and the Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) species complex. The objective of this study was to monitor the spatial distribution and diversity of these species and to detect the presence of secondary bacterial endosymbionts in individuals collected in areas of intensive tomato production. In total, 628 whitefly individuals were identified to the species level using restriction analysis (PCR-RFLP) of a fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase I gene (mtCOI). Trialeurodes vaporariorum was the predominant species, followed by B. tabaci Mediterranean (MED). Bemisia tabaci New World (NW) and B. tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) were present in lower numbers. The mtCOI fragment was sequenced for 89 individuals and a single haplotype was found for each whitefly species. Using molecular markers, the 628 individuals were analyzed for the presence of four endosymbionts. Arsenophonus Gherna et al. (Enterobacterales: Morganellaceae) was most frequently associated with T. vaporariorum, whereas Wolbachia Hertig (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) and Rickettsia da Rocha-Lima (Rickettsiales: Rickettsiaceae) were associated with B. tabaci MED. This study confirmed that B. tabaci NW has not been completely displaced by the invasive species B. tabaci MED and B. tabaci MEAM1 present in the country. An association was found between whitefly species present in tomato and certain secondary endosymbionts, elevation was the most likely environmental factor to affect their frequency.

Whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) are a group of insects with a worldwide distribution. There are at least 1,550 described species, of which 50 are pests causing important losses in agriculture (Liu et al. 2015). The most economically important species are Trialeurodes vaporariorum Westwood and the species complex traditionally grouped within Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Jones 2003, De Barro et al. 2011, Brown 2016). Both species can be vectors of different genera of plant viruses (Navas-Castillo et al. 2011). The identification of these species is particularly important in tropical and subtropical regions where increased whitefly populations and associated crop losses have been reported over the past decades in bean, tomato, pepper, and other crops (Varma and Malathi 2003, Navas-Castillo et al. 2011, Barboza et al. 2019b). Bemisia tabaci is a complex of morphologically indistinguishable species (Boykin and De Barro 2014, Boykin et al. 2017) that can be identified using molecular techniques. Identification of whitefly species is relevant for agriculture because species have been observed to differ in resistance to insecticides and efficiency of pathogen transmission (Perring et al. 1993).

In Costa Rica, B. tabaci New World (NW), B. tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) (both species formerly known as biotype A and B, respectively), and T. vaporariorum were present in different regions of the country prior to 2006 (Morales et al. 2005, Hilje and Morales 2008). In 2009, B. tabaci Mediterranean (MED) or the species commonly known as biotype Q was reported in greenhouses in the western Central Region (Guevara-Coto et al. 2011), and soon after (2011–2012), it was found in field and greenhouse-grown tomato and sweet pepper (Barboza et al. 2019a). Other recent reports have also informed of the presence of B. tabaci MED in field-grown crops in America (Alemandri et al. 2015, McKenzie and Osborne 2017).

One interaction that has been shown to have a wide impact on the ecology of whiteflies is bacterial endosymbiosis (Baumann 2005). To date, one primary and at least seven secondary endosymbionts have been described in these hemipterans (Bing et al. 2013a, b; Wang et al. 2019). In addition to providing nutrients to the insect, secondary endosymbiosis with Hamiltonella Candidatus Hamiltonella (Enterobacterales: Enterobacteriaceae), Rickettsia, or Wolbachia confers resistance to parasitic wasps and viral and fungal pathogens and improves tolerance to heat stress (Scarborough et al. 2005, Guay et al. 2009, Łukasik et al. 2013). The secondary endosymbionts Arsenophonus, Rickettsia, and Wolbachia are capable of altering insect reproduction with the apparent effect of self-dispersal in the host population, although this may require that the symbiont be located in the reproductive organs (Gottlieb et al. 2008, Engelstädter and Hurst 2009). Secondary endosymbionts can also participate in whitefly-virus pathosystems, as in the case of Hamiltonella and Rickettsia, which can facilitate virus transmission through direct or indirect interaction with the virus (Gottlieb et al. 2010, Kliot et al. 2014, Czosnek et al. 2017, Bello et al. 2019). In addition to the individual effects produced by each endosymbiont, the presence of endosymbiont species in different combinations can affect the susceptibility of whiteflies to various insecticidal compounds (Chu et al. 2011). The association between whiteflies and specific secondary bacterial endosymbionts can vary with geographical location, host plant, whitefly species or genetic group, and even within individuals of the same population, and it is important to characterize these associations (Gueguen et al. 2010, Pan et al. 2012, de Moraes et al. 2018). The objective of the present study was to monitor the distribution and diversity of whitefly species and detect their secondary bacterial endosymbionts in the principal zones of tomato production in Costa Rica.

Materials and Methods

Whitefly Collection

Adult whiteflies were collected in 81 commercial tomato fields, 32 of which were visited in 2015 and 49 in 2016 (Fig. 1, Table 1). All of the insects collected at a single site constituted a sample. At least five individuals were analyzed per sample, except for 15 samples that contained fewer than five individuals (Table 1). Costa Rica is a tropical country with two seasons: the dry season, which extends from January to April, and the rainy season, from July to November. The country is divided into seven provinces, six of which were included in the surveys (Alajuela, Cartago, Guanacaste, Heredia, Puntarenas, and San José). The Limón province was not included because it is not an area of tomato production. The sampling sites were located in tomato fields at elevations of 800–1,600 m above sea level (m a.s.l.), with temperatures ranging from 18 to 30°C. Mean annual precipitation was from 950 to 4,000 mm (Ortiz-Malavasi 2009). Individual whiteflies were collected during the dry season using a manual aspirator. Whiteflies were placed in 70% alcohol in vials and stored at –20°C until analyzed at the Centro de Investigación en Biología Celular y Molecular (CIBCM), Universidad de Costa Rica.

Extraction of Whitefly DNA

DNA was extracted from 628 adult whiteflies using a modification of the Chelex 100 (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO) method described by Walsh et al. (1991). Each individual was crushed without liquid in a 1.5-ml tube and then 30 µl of distilled water were added. Chelex 100 was added (30 µl) to 50% and the suspension was homogenized. Suspensions were incubated at 56°C for 15 min and at 99°C for 3 min, then centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 5 min. Total DNA was obtained by extracting 30 µl of supernatant from each tube.

Identification of Whitefly Species by PCR-RFLP

An ∼800-bp fragment of the mtCOI gene was amplified by PCR using the primers C1-J-2915 (Simon et al. 1994) and 801c (Dalmon et al. 2008). The PCR mix included DreamTaq PCR Master Mix (2X) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA) at a final concentration of 1×, 3 µl of nucleic acids, and 0.3 µM of primers in a total reaction volume of 25 µl. A variation of the thermal profile described by Frohlich et al. (1999) was used with an initial denaturing at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 37°C for 45 s, and 70°C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min.

The PCR product was digested in independent reactions with the restriction enzymes Tru9I (Promega, Madison, WI) and TaqI (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 65°C for 3 h. Each reaction consisted of 1 U of enzyme, buffer solution and water in a final volume of 15 µl. DNA fragments were visualized in a 2.5% agarose gel stained with GelRed (Biotium, Fremont, CA). The diagnostic band patterns described by Bosco et al. (2006) were used to differentiate B. tabaci MEAM1, B. tabaci MED, B. tabaci Asia I, B. tabaci Sub-Sahara Africa 2, B. tabaci Italy, and T. vaporariorum.

Sequence Analysis of the mtCOI Gene

The ∼800 bp mtCOI gene fragments from 89 individuals were sequenced (Macrogen Inc., Seoul, Korea) (Table 1). Sequences were assembled using the Staden Package (Bonfield et al. 1995) and aligned using the MUSCLE algorithm (MEGA 7) (Kumar et al. 2016). Sequences were compared with those available in the databases using the similarity percentage obtained with the BlastN tool (Altschul et al. 1990).

The number of haplotypes for each species was estimated using DnaSP v5.10.1. Haplotypes were compared with those described by Barboza et al. (2019a). The fragments analyzed were 532 bp for T. vaporariorum (nt 77–608 of mtCOI gene, KF991608), and 657 bp for B. tabaci MED, B. tabaci MEAM1, and B. tabaci NW (nt 1–657 of mtCOI gene, KJ606633). The seven sequences obtained for B. tabaci NW were compared with 21 accessions of this species available in GenBank ( Supp Table 1 [online only]). A phylogenetic tree was constructed using Mr. Bayes 3.2.6 (Huelsenbeck et al. 2001), considering 10 million generations, eight Markov chains, sampling each 2,000 generations and a mixed nucleotide substitution method (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003). One sequence for each haplotype was considered for phylogeny construction using the B. tabaci NW2 sequence JN689353 as an external group. Aligned haplotypes of B. tabaci NW (Table 2) were analyzed for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using AF342770 from Honduras as a reference sequence.

Detection of Secondary Bacterial Endosymbionts

Each of the 628 whiteflies was analyzed and individually considered for the presence of secondary bacterial endosymbionts. Although at least seven secondary endosymbionts have been described in whiteflies (Wolbachia, Arsenophonus, Hamiltonella, Rickettsia, Cardinium, Fritschea, and Hemipteriphilus), in this study, it was included the ones possibly involved in the whiteflies fitness according to literature. Independent PCRs were performed to amplify the 23S rDNA genes of Arsenophonus and the 16S of Wolbachia and Rickettsia (Thao and Baumann 2004, Heddi et al. 1999, Gottlieb 2006). The primers Hb-F/Hb-R and Ham-F/Ham-R (Zchori-Fein and Brown 2002) were tested for detection of Hamiltonella, but due to a cross-reaction with Arsenophonus, which was confirmed by sequencing, this species was excluded from the study.

Fig. 1.

Distribution of whitefly species identified in surveys of field-grown tomato in 2015 (A) and 2016 (B).

img-z3-1_2900.jpg

Each PCR contained DreamTaq PCR Master Mix (2×; Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a final concentration of 1×, 2.5 µl of DNA, and 0.3 µM of each primer in a reaction volume of 12.5 µl. PCR specificity was confirmed by sequencing randomly selected PCR products for each endosymbiont. A χ2-test was performed between the frequency of hosts and the tested secondary endosymbionts to determine whether any association exists between the host and endosymbionts, using the statistical package R, version 3.4.2 ( http://cran.r-project/org).

Environmental Factors Analysis

For each sampling site, latitude, longitude, and elevation were recorded. Average yearly precipitation and temperatures were also determined for each site based on the Holdridge life zones system. To determine how environmental variables affected host and endosymbiont frequencies, spatial autocorrelation on host frequency was initially tested by means of a Mantel correlation test (excluding B. tabaci NW and B. tabaci MEAM1 hosts due to small frequencies) as implemented by Sepúlveda et al. (2017).

A generalized linear mixed model (glmm) was used to estimate the probability of finding T. vaporariorum over B. tabaci MED host as a binomially distributed response variable dependent on latitude, longitude, elevation, precipitation, and temperature, with year as a random factor. Separate glmm analysis were also run to model each endosymbiont frequency on the same explanatory variables. However, in these separate analysis, the proportion of T. vaporariorum hosts (B. tabaci MED = 1 – T. vaporariorum) was included as a covariate. Glmm's were fit using a binomial distribution and a logit link function, using the lme4 library in the R statistical language version 3.6.2.

Results

Identification of Whitefly Species by PCR-RFLP

In total, 81 samples were collected in the main areas of tomato production in Costa Rica. The mtCOI fragment was analyzed by PCR-RFLP for 628 individual whiteflies, 178 of which were collected in 2015 and 450 in 2016. The species were identified as T. vaporariorum, B. tabaci MED, B. tabaci MEAM1, and B. tabaci NW. Bemisia tabaci NW was not identified by the diagnostic bands described by Bosco et al. (2006); however, it could be distinguished from the other species based on the band pattern generated with Tru9I (184, 138, 107, and 84 bp) and by the lack of digestion with TaqI ( Supp Fig. 1 [online only]).

Trialeurodes vaporariorum was the most frequent species in tomato fields in both sampling years. In total, 430 whiteflies individuals were identified, while B. tabaci results showed that B. tabaci MED was the most frequent species in comparison with B. tabaci NW and B. tabaci MEAM1 (Table 1). Species representativeness varied among the provinces; in Puntarenas in 2015, T. vaporariorum individuals were 27% points higher than B. tabaci MED. In Heredia, T. vaporariorum was the only species detected. Bemisia tabaci MED was not present in samples from Guanacaste or Heredia, and B. tabaci NW was found in low numbers in Guanacaste and Puntarenas (6% or less). In 2016, T. vaporariorum was more frequent than B. tabaci MED (4–17% points higher) in Alajuela, Cartago, and Heredia. Bemisia tabaci MED was not present in samples from Puntarenas or San José, whereas B. tabaci NW individuals were found in low numbers in Alajuela, Cartago and Puntarenas (2% or less). It is important to note that the only two B. tabaci MEAM1 individuals identified in this study were found in Alajuela (Table 1).

Table 1.

Species frequency of whitefly species Trialeurodes vaporariorum, Bemisia tabaci Mediterranean (MED), B. tabaci New World (NW), and B. tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) collected in areas of tomato production

img-z4-12_2900.gif

Two or more whitefly species were found in sympatry in several sampling sites. In 2015, T. vaporariorum and B. tabaci MED were found to coexist in nine of the sampling sites, and T. vaporariorum and B. tabaci NW were found together in two sites. In the remaining 21 samples, only one species was present (T. vaporariorum, B. tabaci MED, or B. tabaci NW; Fig. 1A). In 2016, T. vaporariorum and B. tabaci MED were found together in 22 sites; these two species occurred most frequently together and were distributed together throughout the Central Region (Alajuela, San José, Heredia, and Cartago). Trialeurodes vaporariorum and B. tabaci NW were found together in one site. Note that two new combinations of coexisting species were found in 2016: T. vaporariorum, B. tabaci MED, and B. tabaci NW in four sites and T. vaporariorum, B. tabaci MED, and B. tabaci MEAM1 in one site. In the remaining 21 sites sampled, only one species was identified: T. vaporariorum, B. tabaci MED, or B. tabaci NW (Fig. 1B).

Elevation was another variable considered in this study. All of the whitefly species identified were found between 800 and 1,600 m a.s.l. Bemisia tabaci NW was the most abundant species at sites below 800 m a.s.l., whereas B. tabaci MED could be found at elevations above 1,600 m a.s.l. Trialeurodes vaporariorum was found at all elevations. The two B. tabaci MEAM1 individuals were found at ∼800 m a.s.l.

Table 2.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) detected in American Bemisia tabaci NW haplotypes from the 657 nucleotide sequence of the mtCOI gene fragment considered in this studya

img-A6t_2900.gif

Analysis of Partial mtCOI Gene Sequences

The mtCOI gene was partially sequenced for 89 whitefly individuals previously identified by PCR–RFLP. Included were 52 sequences from T. vaporariorum, 29 from B. tabaci MED, 7 from B. tabaci NW, and 1 from B. tabaci MEAM1 (Table 1). A single haplotype was found for each of the four whitefly species identified. These were deposited in GenBank with the accession numbers MH510175 (T. vaporariorum), MH510176 (B. tabaci MED), MH510178 (B. tabaci NW), and MH510177 (B. tabaci MEAM1). Haplotypes found in the T. vaporariorum, B. tabaci MED, and B. tabaci MEAM1 sequences were compared with those described in the Western Hemisphere by Barboza et al. (2019a) and were found to correspond to Tv-i, MED-i and MEAM1-i. Whitefly individuals with the Tv-i haplotype sequence were found in all of the provinces where T. vaporariorum was present. MED-i haplotype sequence was found in the Alajuela, Heredia, Cartago, and San José provinces, whereas MEAM1-i haplotype was present in the Alajuela province. Analysis of the B. tabaci NW sequences in the present study allowed the identification of 15 haplotypes of this species. In Fig. 2, the phylogenetic tree showed that sequences from Costa Rica (MH510178) were close to whitefly individuals described in Panama (DQ130060, DQ130061) but did not coincide with any other haplotypes reported for this species in America. SNP analysis detected the presence of 32 SNPs, of which 18 caused nonsynonymous changes (nsSNPs) in the amino acid coding sequence (Table 2).

Detection of Secondary Bacterial Endosymbionts

The 628 identified whitefly individuals were screened for the presence of secondary bacterial endosymbionts. Sequences of PCR products from each endosymbiont were analyzed and used as positive controls in subsequent amplifications. The frequency of hosts and their symbionts were not independent (χ2 = 544.05, df = 2, P < 0.01). The data show that Wolbachia and Rickettsia are more common in B. tabaci MED species, whereas Arsenophonus is more frequent in T. vaporariorum. In the B. tabaci NW and B. tabaci MEAM1 species, Rickettsia was the only secondary endosymbiont detected.

Bemisia tabaci MED showed a higher number of endosymbionts than T. vaporariorum and B. tabaci NW. The most frequent combination of endosymbionts found together in this species, Wolbachia and Rickettsia, was present in 65.3% of the individuals in 2015 and 68.4% in 2016 (Fig. 3). Arsenophonus was detected in over 80% of the T. vaporariorum individuals analyzed in both sampling periods, whereas Rickettsia was found in over 90% of the B. tabaci MED individuals in both years. Wolbachia was also found in B. tabaci MED in 69.2% of the individuals collected in 2015 and 76% in 2016 (Fig. 3). No secondary endosymbionts were detected in B. tabaci NW individuals collected in 2015, but in 2016, Rickettsia was found in 35.7% of the B. tabaci NW individuals and in the two B. tabaci MEAM1 individuals (figure not shown).

Analysis of abundance data by whitefly species, endosymbiont and province showed that Arsenophonus was present in the majority of the T. vaporariorum individuals analyzed in Alajuela, Cartago, Heredia, Puntarenas, and San José (Table 3). Arsenophonus was also associated with B. tabaci MED from Alajuela, Cartago, Heredia, and San José in lesser amounts (17% or less). Rickettsia was the predominant species in B. tabaci MED individuals; abundance of B. tabaci MED individuals harboring Rickettsia ranged from 89% in Alajuela to 100% in Heredia, Puntarenas, and San José. Rickettsia was also present in T. vaporariorum individuals in Alajuela, Cartago, and Heredia (≤21%). Bemisia tabaci NW individuals harboring Rickettsia were detected only in Alajuela and Cartago, whereas B. tabaci MED individuals harboring Wolbachia ranged from 44% in San José to 100% in Puntarenas. Wolbachia was also present in T. vaporariorum individuals in Alajuela and Cartago in low numbers (2% or less).

Fig. 2.

Phylogenetic tree of Bemisia tabaci NW considering 657 nucleotides of the mtCOI gene sequences reported for the western hemisphere and the B. tabaci NW2 (GenBank  JN689353) sequence as an external group. Sequences were aligned using MUSCLE and the tree was built by Bayesian inference. Numbers close to the branches represent Bayesian posterior probabilities; bars indicate the number of substitutions per site. The haplotype from Costa Rica is in bold.

img-z6-1_2900.jpg

Environmental Factors Analysis

Neither evidence of spatial autocorrelation (Mantel rM = 0.025; P = 0.252) was found nor statistical support for the effect of latitude, longitude, precipitation, or temperature on host or endosymbiont frequencies (P > 0.05). The frequency of T. vaporariorum was marginally affected by elevation (β = 0.111, P = 0.091). Secondary endosymbiont frequencies were always affected by the frequency of T. vaporariorum hosts; the likelihood of Arsenophonus increased with each increase in T. vaporariorum frequency (β = 1.986, P < 0.001). Since T. vaporariorum tends to increase with elevation, so does the frequency of Arsenophonus endosymbionts. Wolbachia and Rickettsia frequencies both decreased significantly with an increase in T. vaporariorum frequency (i.e., meaning they increased with B. tabaci MED frequency; βW = –3.316, P < 0.001; βR = –2.816, P < 0.001 for Wolbachia and Rickettsia, respectively); and both their frequencies increased with elevation (βW = 0.2094, P = 0.082; βR = 0.2135, P = 0.032). Also, a quadratic term of elevation to see if frequencies increase at intermediate elevations was tested; however, quadratic terms were not significant, and based on AIC including a polynomial term did not improve the fit of the models.

These previous results suggest that Arsenophonus is more likely found in T. vaporariorum hosts at higher elevations, whereas Wolbachia and Rickettsia are more likely found in B. tabaci MED hosts. These patterns are independent of geographical location and are unlikely to be affected by temperature or precipitation. The most likely environmental factor shaping the frequency of hosts and symbionts is elevation. In our data set, elevation and precipitation were not significantly correlated (r = 0.151; P > 0.05), nor elevation and temperature (r = –0.314; P > 0.05).

Discussion

In this study, whitefly individuals were collected in 81 tomato fields in Costa Rica in 2015 and 2016. Trialeurodes vaporariorum was the most abundant species. Previous reports indicated the presence of this species in the country associated with different crops, especially tomato (Morales et al. 2005, Guevara-Coto et al. 2011, Vargas-Asencio et al. 2013). The present study confirms the distribution of B. tabaci MED in field-grown tomato, especially in the Central Region of the country where the majority of tomato production is located. In 2009, Guevara-Coto et al. (2011) made the first report of this species in greenhouse production. Later surveys identified this species in open fields (Barboza et al. 2019a).

Bemisia tabaci NW was also detected. This species was last reported in the country over 10 yr ago (Morales et al. 2005) and was believed to be absent due to the presence of the invasive whiteflies B. tabaci MED and B. tabaci MEAM1. In the present study, B. tabaci NW was more abundant in the outer limits of the Central Region where tomato production is less intensive. This finding could indicate that this species is being displaced by invasive species; however, B. tabaci NW, B. tabaci MED, and T. vaporariorum could still be found in sympatry in tomato. The invasive B. tabaci MED may be displacing the native species in Costa Rica, due to its lower susceptibility to several insecticides such as piriproxyfen and the neonicotinoids (Horowitz and Ishaaya 2014). These are among the most commonly applied compounds in Costa Rica; piriproxyfen is the most widely used insecticide in important crops in terms of production and consumption, including tomato (Morera, 2015). Similar reports have been published from Venezuela and Brazil (Romay et al. 2011, Marubayashi et al. 2012).

Bemisia tabaci MEAM1 was the least abundant species in this study. This result is similar to that of a 2011–2012 survey in which this species was found only in sweet pepper and bean (Barboza et al. 2019a). Recent reports in Western Hemisphere indicate that B. tabaci MEAM1 is the predominant species in the B. tabaci complex in important agricultural regions (Marubayashi et al. 2012, McKenzie et al. 2012, Rodríguez et al. 2012, Romay et al. 2016), although Alemandri et al. (2015) reported a similar frequency for B. tabaci MEAM1 and B. tabaci NW2 in bean in Argentina. Despite its predominance in these agricultural regions, studies in controlled environments show that application of the most common insecticides causes the artificial selection of B. tabaci MED over B. tabaci MEAM1 in tomato crops (Sun et al. 2013); this may be one of the reasons for the low abundance of B. tabaci MEAM1 reported in this study.

Twenty-two haplotypes for the mtCOI region have been described for T. vaporariorum in the Western Hemisphere; however, only individuals with the Tv-i haplotype were identified in this study. This is the same haplotype found in most of T. vaporariorum individuals previously reported by Barboza et al. (2019a) and also matched with whitefly sequences available from Spain and France. Out of the seven B. tabaci MED haplotypes previously reported in America (Barboza et al. 2019a), a single haplotype was detected in the current study (MED-i). Previously, the MED-i and MED-ii haplotypes were identified in Costa Rica, which suggests that individuals with the MED-ii haplotype may be present in low abundance. Individuals with the B. tabaci MEAM1-i haplotype were found in the Alajuela province. The sequences were identical to previously reported from individuals collected in sweet pepper and common bean in the Cartago province (GenBank  KY441488). Our findings confirm that this haplotype is present in Costa Rica, although in low numbers. In this study, a B. tabaci NW haplotype is described for the first time and compared with sequences available for this species in the online databases ( www.GenBank.com). With the exception of one sequence from Sudan (Gueguen et al. 2010), this species has not been found in other continents. B. tabaci NW sequences taken from the databases and included in the phylogenetic tree corresponded to samples from North and Central America ranging from the United States to Panama (Fig. 2). In contrast, the NW2 species has been reported in South America (Marubayashi et al. 2012, Alemandri et al. 2015). The high frequency of nsSNPs present in B. tabaci NW may be explained by the fact that this species is endemic to America and may have adapted to different agroclimatic conditions in the countries where it is present.

Fig. 3.

Abundance of endosymbionts Arsenophonus, Rickettsia and Wolbachia in whitefly species Trialeurodes vaporariorum, Bemisia tabaci MED and B. tabaci NW collected in tomato fields in 2015 and 2016.

img-z7-4_2900.jpg

The presence of three endosymbionts was confirmed in whiteflies collected in tomato fields in the main areas of tomato production in the country. Regarding the endosymbionts not considered in this study, to our knowledge, it is not clear if Cardinium and Fritschea play a role in whiteflies population fitness or in an ecological interaction relevant for agricultural purposes in the studied species. In America, Cardinium has been found in low numbers in B. tabaci MEAM1 and B. tabaci MED from Brazil (De Moraes et al. 2018). Fritschea has been identified in low frequencies in B. tabaci MEAM1 and B. tabaci NW2 (Marubayashi et al. 2014) and has been absent in many other populations (Skaljac et al. 2010, Chu et al. 2011, Ghosh et al. 2015). The secondary endosymbiont Hemipteriphilus has been reported in B. tabaci group of species named China 1 or formerly known as biotype ZHJ3 (Bing et al. 2013a, b).

Table 3.

Bacterial endosymbionts frequency identified in individual whiteflies collected in the main areas of tomato production in Costa Rica

img-z8-2_2900.gif

In this study, an association between Arsenophonus and T. vaporariorum was found, similar to that described by Kapantaidaki et al. (2014) and Skaljac et al. (2013). The composition of endosymbiont populations associated with B. tabaci MED varies among countries in Latin America, and for the most part, Arsenophonus is absent (Barbosa et al. 2014). In Costa Rica, Rickettsia was found in more than 90% of the B. tabaci MED individuals. It is important to note that this endosymbiont is characteristically found outside of the bacteriocyte in the hemolymph (Caspi-Fluger et al. 2011) and can interact with organs in the body cavity of the insect and with circulative viruses such as Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) (Kliot et al. 2014). Further studies of this endosymbiont in B. tabaci MED populations may provide more information about its impact on the ecology of this species in Costa Rica.

Rickettsia was present in B. tabaci NW individuals in the Central Region of the country, but not in the Puntarenas or Guanacaste provinces. This may be evidence of a horizontal interspecific transmission event (Chrostek et al. 2017, Li et al. 2017a,b). The whiteflies collected in the Central Region were found coexisting in tomato fields with high numbers of B. tabaci MED, which is frequently associated with Rickettsia (Table 3). The frequent association of B. tabaci MED and Rickettsia in different sampling sites (Table 3) may be due to the genetic homogeneity found in B. tabaci MED (a single haplotype). Previous studies have shown a relationship between whitefly genetic heterogeneity and the heterogeneity of their endosymbionts (Gnankiné et al. 2012, de Moraes et al. 2018). The association of Wolbachia with B. tabaci MED also requires attention since it has been associated with increased adaptation and number of female progeny in B. tabaci MED (Xue et al. 2012).

A number of studies have suggested that environmental factors can affect the frequency of the endosymbiont on the host (Doremus et al. 2017, Sepúlveda et al. 2017, Zhu et al. 2018). In this study, precipitation, temperature, and elevation were considered. Secondary endosymbionts have been reported to help hosts cope with extreme environmental conditions (Oliver et al. 2010), nevertheless, in temperatures that vary from 18 to 30°C and annual precipitation that ranges from 950 to 4,000 mm, the secondary endosymbiont presence in whiteflies was more likely to be affected by elevation (800–1,600 m a.s.l.). It is known that B. tabaci MED does not adapt well to elevations exceeding 1,000 m a.s.l. (Morales and Jones 2004), so it was expected to find a lower frequency of this species relative to T. vaporariorum at higher elevations. The fact that Wolbachia and Rickettsia frequencies in B. tabaci MED did not increase significantly with elevation is probably related to the introduction of this species. Because there are a few introduced genetic groups of B. tabaci in the country (MED-i and MED-ii) and secondary endosymbionts are mainly vertically transmitted, if few environmental factors are involved, these whiteflies will tend to harbor the same endosymbionts. Studies in aphids show that the vertical transmission efficiency can be affected by temperature (Liu et al. 2019), but according to our results, temperature was not correlated with elevation. In the case of T. vaporariorum, it was more likely to be found harboring Arsenophonus at higher elevations. Although Arsenophonus is highly associated with T. vaporariorum around the world, the increase of their presence in the host at higher elevations has not been mentioned before. Because it is an endemic species, the pattern could be related to adaptation, but more data are needed to support this claim.

In conclusion, through surveys conducted in 2015 and 2016, whitefly diversity in commercial tomato fields in Costa Rica was monitored. Trialeurodes vaporariorum was the predominant species; however, the presence of B. tabaci MED has increased in the last 10 yr in some areas such as Cartago, where previously only T. vaporariorum was detected. The identification of B. tabaci NW individuals confirmed that this species has not been completely displaced by the invasive species B. tabaci MED and B. tabaci MEAM1. Haplotype analysis confirmed the presence of the most frequent groups of T. vaporariorum, B. tabaci MED, and B. tabaci MEAM1 previously reported in the country; however, the haplotype found for B. tabaci NW did not coincide with any other reported in America. An association between whitefly species and secondary bacterial endosymbionts was observed and elevation was an environmental factor most likely to affect their presence. Arsenophonus was found most frequently in T. vaporariorum at higher elevations and the endosymbionts Wolbachia and Rickettsia were most frequently associated with B. tabaci MED.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary data are available at Journal of Economic Entomology online. Table S1. Sequences for the mtCOI region of B. tabaci NW from America and their respective haplotypes obtained from GenBank and used in this study.Figure S1. Electrophoretic analysis in a 1 % agarose gel of the restriction of ∼800 bp mtCOI gene fragments of PCR products digested with Tru9I and TaqI. Gel order: 1=B. tabaci Mediterranean, 2=Bemisia tabaci Middle East-Asia Minor 1, 3=Trialeurodes vaporariorum, 4=B. tabaci New World.

Acknowledgments

This research was financed by Financiamiento de la Educación Superior Universitaria Estatal del Consejo Nacional de Rectores FEES-CONARE and the Vicerrectoría de Investigación (Project number VI-801-B5-124) of the Universidad de Costa Rica. We acknowledge the support of the Programa de Investigación y Transferencia de Tecnología de Tomate (Program for Tomato Research and Transfer of Technology, PITTA Tomato), the Servicio Fitosanitario del Estado, and the growers who allowed access to their farms.

References Cited

1.

Alemandri, V., C. G. Vaghi Medina, A. D. Dumón, E. B. Argüello Caro, M. F. Mattio, S. García Medina, P. M. López Lambertini, and G. Truol . 2015. Three members of the Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) cryptic species complex occur sympatrically in Argentine horticultural crops. J. Econ. Entomol. 108: 405–413. Google Scholar

2.

Altschul, S. F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman . 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403–410. Google Scholar

3.

Barbosa, L. d. a. F., J. M. Marubayashi, B. R. De Marchi, V. A. Yuki, M. A. Pavan, E. Moriones, J. Navas-Castillo, and R. Krause-Sakate . 2014. Indigenous American species of the Bemisia tabaci complex are still widespread in the Americas. Pest Manag. Sci. 70: 1440–1445. Google Scholar

4.

Barboza, N. M., P. Esker, A. K. Inoue- Nagata, and E. Moriones . 2019a. Genetic diversity and geographic distribution of Bemisia tabaci and Trialeurodes vaporariorum in Costa Rica. Ann. Appl. Biol. 174: 248–261. Google Scholar

5.

Barboza, N. M., E. Hernández, A. K. Inoue-Nagata, E. Moriones, and L. Hilje . 2019b. Achievements in the epidemiology of begomoviruses and their vector Bemisia tabaci in Costa Rica. Revista de Biología Tropical. 67: 419–453. Google Scholar

6.

Baumann, P. 2005. Biology bacteriocyte-associated endosymbionts of plant sap-sucking insects. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 59: 155–189. Google Scholar

7.

Bello, V. H., L. F. M. Watanabe, B. R. Santos, J. M. Marubayashi, V. A. Yuki, B. R. De Marchi, M. A. Pavan, and R. Krause-Sakate . 2019. Evidence for increased efficiency of virus transmission by populations of Mediterranean species of Bemisia tabaci with high Hamiltonella prevalence. Phytoparasitica. 47: 293–300. Google Scholar

8.

Bing, X. L., Y. M. Ruan, Q. Rao, X. W. Wang, and S. S. Liu . 2013a. Diversity of secondary endosymbionts among different putative species of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci. Insect Sci. 20: 194–206. Google Scholar

9.

Bing, X. L., J. Yang, E. Zchori-Fein, X. W. Wang, and S. S. Liu . 2013b. Characterization of a newly discovered symbiont of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79: 569–575. Google Scholar

10.

Bonfield, J. K., K. f. Smith, and R. Staden . 1995. A new DNA sequence assembly program. Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 4992–4999. Google Scholar

11.

Bosco, D., A. Loria, C. Sartor, and J. L. Cenis . 2006. PCR-RFLP identification of Bemisia tabaci biotypes in the mediterranean basin. Phytoparasitica. 34: 243–251. Google Scholar

12.

Boykin, L. M., and P. J. De Barro . 2014. A practical guide to identifying members of the Bemisia tabaci species complex: and other morphologically identical species. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2: 45. Google Scholar

13.

Boykin, L. M., A. Savill, and P. De Barro . 2017. Updated mtCOI reference dataset for the Bemisia tabaci species complex. F1000Res. 6: 1835. Google Scholar

14.

Brown, J. K. 2016. Vector-mediated transmission of plant pathogens. American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, MN. Google Scholar

15.

Caspi-Fluger, A., M. Inbar, N. Mozes-Daube, L. Mouton, M. S. Hunter, and E. Zchori-Fein . 2011. Rickettsia ‘in’ and ‘out': two different localization patterns of a bacterial symbiont in the same insect species. PLoS One. 6: e21096. Google Scholar

16.

Chrostek, E., K. Pelz-Stelinski, G. D. D. Hurst, and G. L. Hughes . 2017. Horizontal Transmission of Intracellular Insect Symbionts via Plants. Front. Microbiol. 8: 2237. Google Scholar

17.

Chu, D., C. S. Gao, P. De Barro, Y. J. Zhang, F. H. Wan, and I. A. Khan . 2011. Further insights into the strange role of bacterial endosymbionts in whitefly, Bemisia tabaci: comparison of secondary symbionts from biotypes B and Q in China. Bull. Entomol. Res. 101: 477–486. Google Scholar

18.

Czosnek, H., A. Hariton-Shalev, I. Sobol, R. Gorovits, and M. Ghanim . 2017. The Incredible journey of begomoviruses in their whitefly vector. Viruses. 9: 273. Google Scholar

19.

Dalmon, A., F. Halkett, M. Granier, H. Delatte, and M. Peterschmitt . 2008. Genetic structure of the invasive pest Bemisia tabaci: evidence of limited but persistent genetic differentiation in glasshouse populations. Heredity (Edinb). 100: 316–325. Google Scholar

20.

De Barro, P. J., S. S. Liu, L. M. Boykin, and A. B. Dinsdale . 2011. Bemisia tabaci: a statement of species status. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 56: 1–19. Google Scholar

21.

Doremus, M. R., A. H. Smith, K. L. Kim, A. J. Holder, J. A. Russell, and K. M. Oliver . 2017. Breakdown of a defensive symbiosis, but not endogenous defences, at elevated temperatures. Mol. Ecol. 27: 2138–2151. Google Scholar

22.

Engelstädter, J., and G. D. Hurst . 2009. The ecology and evolution of microbes that manipulate host reproduction. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40: 127–149. Google Scholar

23.

Frohlich, D. R., I. Torres-Jerez, I, I. D. Bedford, P. G. Markham, and J. K. Brown . 1999. A phylogeographical analysis of the Bemisia tabaci species complex based on mitochondrial DNA markers. Mol. Ecol. 8: 1683–1691. Google Scholar

24.

Ghosh, S., S. Bouvaine, and M. N. Maruthi . 2015. Prevalence and genetic diversity of endosymbiotic bacteria infecting cassava whiteflies in Africa. BMC Microbiol. 15: 93. Google Scholar

25.

Gnankiné, O., L. Mouton, H. Henri, G. Terraz, T. Houndeté, T. Martin, T. Vavre, and F. Fleury . 2012. Distribution of Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) biotypes and their associated symbiotic bacteria on host plants in West Africa. Insect. Conserv. Divers. 6: 411–421. Google Scholar

26.

Gottlieb, Y., M. Ghanim, E. Chiel, D. Gerling, V. Portnoy, S. Steinberg, G. Tzuri, A. R. Horowitz, E. Belausov, N. Mozes-Daube , et al. 2006. Identification and localization of a Rickettsia sp. in Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 3646–3652. Google Scholar

27.

Gottlieb, Y., M. Ghanim, G. Gueguen, S. Kontsedalov, F. Vavre, F. Fleury, and E. Zchori-Fein . 2008. Inherited intracellular ecosystem: symbiotic bacteria share bacteriocytes in whiteflies. Faseb J. 22: 2591–2599. Google Scholar

28.

Gottlieb, Y., E. Zchori-Fein, N. Mozes-Daube, S. Kontsedalov, M. Skaljac, M. Brumin, I. Sobol, H. Czosnek, F. Vavre, F. Fleury , et al. 2010. The transmission efficiency of tomato yellow leaf curl virus by the whitefly Bemisia tabaci is correlated with the presence of a specific symbiotic bacterium species. J. Virol. 84: 9310–9317. Google Scholar

29.

Guay, J. F., S. Boudreault, D. Michaud, and C. Cloutier . 2009. Impact of environmental stress on aphid clonal resistance to parasitoids: role of Hamiltonella defensa bacterial symbiosis in association with a new facultative symbiont of the pea aphid. J. Insect Physiol. 55: 919–926. Google Scholar

30.

Gueguen, G., F. Vavre, O. Gnankine, M. Peterschmitt, D. Charif, E. Chiel, Y. Gottlieb, M. Ghanim, E. Zchori-Fein, and F. Fleury . 2010. Endosymbiont metacommunities, mtDNA diversity and the evolution of the Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) species complex. Mol. Ecol. 19: 4365–4376. Google Scholar

31.

Guevara-Coto, J. A., N. Barboza-Vargas, E. Hernández-Jiménez, R. W. Hammond, and P. Ramirez-Fonseca . 2011. Bemisia tabaci Biotype Q is present in Costa Rica. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 131: 167–170. Google Scholar

32.

Heddi, A., A. M. Grenier, C. Khatchadourian, H. Charles, and P. Nardon . 1999. Four intracellular genomes direct weevil biology: nuclear, mitochondrial, principal endosymbiont, and Wolbachia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96: 6814–6819. Google Scholar

33.

Hilje, L., and F. J. Morales . 2008. Whitefly bioecology and management in Latin America, pp. 4250–4260. In J. L. Capinera, Encyclopedia of entomology. Springer, Gainesville, FL. Google Scholar

34.

Horowitz, A. R., and I. Ishaaya . 2014. Dynamics of biotypes B and Q of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci and its impact on insecticide resistance. Pest Manag. Sci. 70: 1568–1572. Google Scholar

35.

Huelsenbeck, J. P., F. Ronquist, R. Nielsen, and J. P. Bollback . 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science. 294: 2310–2314. Google Scholar

36.

Jones, D. R. 2003. Plant viruses transmitted by whiteflies. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 109: 195–219. Google Scholar

37.

Kapantaidaki, D. E., I. Ovčarenko, N. Fytrou, K. E. Knott, K. Bourtzis, and A. Tsagkarakou . 2014. Low levels of mitochondrial DNA and symbiont diversity in the worldwide agricultural pest, the greenhouse whitefly Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). J. Hered. 106: 80–92. Google Scholar

38.

Kliot, A., M. Cilia, H. Czosnek, and M. Ghanim . 2014. Implication of the bacterial endosymbiont Rickettsia spp. in interactions of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci with tomato yellow leaf curl virus. J. Virol. 88: 5652–5660. Google Scholar

39.

Kumar, S., G. Stecher, and K. Tamura . 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33: 1870–1874. Google Scholar

40.

Li, S. J., M. Z. Ahmed, N. Lv, P. Q. Shi, X. M. Wang, J. L. Huang, and B. L. Qiu . 2017a. Plantmediated horizontal transmission of Wolbachia between whiteflies. Isme J. 11: 1019–1028. Google Scholar

41.

Li, Y. H., M. Z. Ahmed, S. J. Li, N. Lv, P. Q. Shi, X. S. Chen, and B. L. Qiu . 2017b. Plant-mediated horizontal transmission of Rickettsia endosymbiont between different whitefly species. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 93: 1–9. Google Scholar

42.

Liu, T. X., P. A. Stansly, and D. Gerling . 2015. Whitefly parasitoids: distribution, life history, bionomics, and utilization. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 60: 273–292. Google Scholar

43.

Liu, X. D., H. X. Lei, and F. F. Chen . 2019. Infection pattern and negative effects of a facultative endosymbiont on its insect host are environment-dependent. Sci. Rep. 9: 4013. Google Scholar

44.

Łukasik, P., M. van Asch, H. Guo, J. Ferrari, and H. C. Godfray . 2013. Unrelated facultative endosymbionts protect aphids against a fungal pathogen. Ecol. Lett. 16: 214–218. Google Scholar

45.

Marubayashi, J. M., V. A. Yuki, K. C. G. Rocha, T. Mituti, F. M. Pelegrinotti, F. Z. Ferreira, M. F. Moura, J. Navas-Castillo, E. Moriones, M. A. Pavan , et al. 2012. At least two indigenous species of the Bemisia tabaci complex are present in Brazil. J. Appl. Entomol. 137: 113–121. Google Scholar

46.

Marubayashi, J. M., A. Kliot, V. A. Yuki, J. A. Rezende, R. Krause-Sakate, M. A. Pavan, and M. Ghanim . 2014. Diversity and localization of bacterial endosymbionts from whitefly species collected in Brazil. Plos One. 9: e108363. Google Scholar

47.

McKenzie, C. L., and L. S. Osborne . 2017. Bemisia tabaci MED (Q biotype) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Florida is on the move to residential landscapes and may impact open-field agriculture. Fla. Entomol. 100: 481–484. Google Scholar

48.

McKenzie, C. L., J. A. Bethke, F. J. Byrne, J. R. Chamberlin, T. J. Dennehy, A. M. Dickey, D. Gilrein, P. M. Hall, S. Ludwig, R. D. Oetting , et al. 2012. Distribution of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) biotypes in North America after the Q invasion. J. Econ. Entomol. 105: 753–766. Google Scholar

49.

de Moraes, L. A., C. Muller, R. C. O. F. Bueno, A. Santos, V. H. Bello, B. R. De Marchi, L. F. M. Watanabe, J. M. Marubayashi, B. R. Santos, V. A. Yuki , et al. 2018. Distribution and phylogenetics of whiteflies and their endosymbiont relationships after the Mediterranean species invasion in Brazil. Sci. Rep. 8: 14589. Google Scholar

50.

Morales, F. J. 2007. Tropical Whitefly IPM project. Adv. Virus Res. 69: 249–311. Google Scholar

51.

Morales, F. J., and P. G. Jones . 2004. The ecology and epidemiology of whitefly-transmitted viruses in Latin America. Virus Res. 100: 57–65. Google Scholar

52.

Morales, F. J., L. Hilje, J. Vallejos, G. Sibaja, C. Araya, and R. Araya . 2005. Costa Rica, pp. 217–221. In P. K Anderson and F. J. Morales (eds.), Whitefly and whitefly-borne viruses in the tropics: building a knowledge base for global action. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Cali, Colombia. Google Scholar

53.

Morera, I. 2015. Identificación de principios activos de plaguicidas en frutas, hortalizas y granos básicos en Costa Rica: una propuesta para la implementación de nuevas metodologías de análisis. Pensamiento Actual. 15: 155–171. Google Scholar

54.

Navas-Castillo, J., E. Fiallo-Olivé, and S. Sánchez-Campos . 2011. Emerging virus diseases transmitted by whiteflies. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 49: 219–248. Google Scholar

55.

Oliver, K. M., P. H. Degnan, G. R. Burke, and N. A. Moran . 2010. Facultative symbionts in aphids and the horizontal transfer of ecologically important traits. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55: 247–266. Google Scholar

56.

Ortiz-Malavasi, E. 2009. Atlas digital de Costa Rica 2008.  http://repositoriotec.tec.ac.cr/handle/2238/3140  Google Scholar

57.

Pan, H., X. Li, D. Ge, S. Wang, Q. Wu, W. Xie, X. Jiao, D. Chu, B. Liu, B. Xu , et al. 2012. Factors affecting population dynamics of maternally transmitted endosymbionts in Bemisia tabaci. PLoS One. 7: e30760. Google Scholar

58.

Perring, T. M., A. D. Cooper, R. J. Rodriguez, C. A. Farrar, and T. S. Bellows, Jr . 1993. Identification of a whitefly species by genomic and behavioral studies. Science. 259: 74–77. Google Scholar

59.

Rodríguez, I. V., J. M. Bueno, C. M. Cardona, and H. M. Morales . 2012. Biotipo B de Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae): plaga de pimentón en el Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Entomología. 38: 14–22. Google Scholar

60.

Romay, G., F. Geraud-Pouey, D. Chirinos, M. A. Santana, I. Galindo-Castro, and L. M. Márquez . 2011. Microsatellites reveal widespread predominance of an invasive over an indigenous Bemisia tabaci in Venezuela. Phytoparasitica. 39: 419–428. Google Scholar

61.

Romay, G., F. Geraud-Pouey, D. Chirinos, and J. Demey . 2016. Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)(Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae): historia, situación actual y su rol como vector de enfermedades virales de plantas en Venezuela. Entomotropica. 31: 276–293. Google Scholar

62.

Ronquist, F., and J. P. Huelsenbeck . 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 19: 1572–1574. Google Scholar

63.

Scarborough, C. L., J. Ferrari, and H. C. Godfray . 2005. Aphid protected from pathogen by endosymbiont. Science. 310: 1781. Google Scholar

64.

Sepúlveda, D. A., F. Zepeda-Paulo, C. C. Ramírez, B. Lavandero, and C. C. Figueroa . 2017. Diversity, frequency, and geographic distribution of facultative bacterial endosymbionts in introduced aphid pests. Insect Sci. 24: 511–521. Google Scholar

65.

Simon, C., F. Frati, A. Beckenbach, B. Crespi, H. Liu, and P. Flook . 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87: 651–701. Google Scholar

66.

Skaljac, M., K. Zanic, S. G. Ban, S. Kontsedalov, and M. Ghanim . 2010. Co-infection and localization of secondary symbionts in two whitefly species. BMC Microbiol. 10: 142. Google Scholar

67.

Skaljac, M., K. Zanić, S. Hrnčić, S. Radonjić, T. Perović, and M. Ghanim . 2013. Diversity and localization of bacterial symbionts in three whitefly species (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) from the east coast of the Adriatic Sea. Bull. Entomol. Res. 103: 48–59. Google Scholar

68.

Sun, D. B., Y. Q. Liu, L. Qin, J. Xu, F. F. Li, and S. S. Liu . 2013. Competitive displacement between two invasive whiteflies: insecticide application and host plant effects. Bull. Entomol. Res. 103: 344–353. Google Scholar

69.

Thao, M. L., and P. Baumann . 2004. Evidence for multiple acquisition of Arsenophonus by whitefly species (Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae). Curr. Microbiol. 48: 140–144. Google Scholar

70.

Vargas-Asencio, J. A., E. Hernández, N. Barboza, R. Hammond, F. Mora, and P. Ramírez . 2013. Detection of tomato chlorosis virus and its vector Trialeurodes vaporariorum in greenhouse-grown tomato and sweet pepper in the Cartago province, Costa Rica. J. Plant. Pathol. 3: 627–630. Google Scholar

71.

Varma, A., and V. G Malathi . 2003. Emerging geminivirus problems: a serious threat to crop production. Ann. Appl. Biol. 142: 145–164. Google Scholar

72.

Walsh, P. S., D. A. Metzger, and R. Higuchi . 1991. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques. 10: 506–513. Google Scholar

73.

Wang, H. L., T. Lei, W. Q. Xia, S. L. Cameron, Y. Q. Liu, Z. Zhang, M. M. N. Gowda, P. De Barro, J. Navas-Castillo, C. A. Omongo , et al. 2019. Insight into the microbial world of Bemisia tabaci cryptic species complex and its relationships with its host. Sci. Rep. 9: 6568. Google Scholar

74.

Xue, X., S. J. Li, M. Z. Ahmed, P. J. De Barro, S. X. Ren, and B. L. Qiu . 2012. Inactivation of Wolbachia reveals its biological roles in whitefly host. PLoS One. 7: e48148. Google Scholar

75.

Zchori-Fein, E., and J. K. Brown . 2002. Diversity of prokaryotes associated with Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 95: 711–718. Google Scholar

76.

Zhu, Y. X., Y. L. Song, Y. K. Zhang, A. A. Hoffmann, J. C. Zhou, J. T. Sun, and X. Y. Hong . 2018. Incidence of facultative bacterial endosymbionts in spider mites associated with local environments and host plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84: e02546–17. Google Scholar
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
Xareni Can-Vargas, Natalia Barboza, Eric J. Fuchs, and Eduardo J. Hernández "Spatial Distribution of Whitefly Species (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and Identification of Secondary Bacterial Endosymbionts in Tomato Fields in Costa Rica," Journal of Economic Entomology 113(6), 2900-2910, (19 October 2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toaa215
Received: 2 December 2019; Accepted: 16 August 2020; Published: 19 October 2020
KEYWORDS
Arsenophonus
Bemisia tabaci
Rickettsia
Trialeurodes vaporariorum
Wolbachia
Back to Top