How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2007 Pine Snake (Pituophis Ruthveni and Pituophis Melanoleucus Lodingi) Hibernacula
D. C. Rudolph, R. R. Schaefer, S. J. Burgdorf, M. Duran, R. N. Conner
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Snakes are often highly selective in the choice of sites for hibernation, and suitable sites can potentially be a limiting resource. Hibernating Louisiana Pine Snakes (Pituophis ruthveni; N  =  7) in eastern Texas and Black Pine Snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus lodingi; N  =  5) in Mississippi were excavated to characterize their hibernacula. Pituophis ruthveni hibernated exclusively in burrows of Baird's Pocket Gophers (Geomys breviceps), whereas P. m. lodingi hibernated exclusively in chambers formed by the decay and burning of pine stumps and roots. All snakes hibernated singly at shallow depths (P. ruthveni mean  =  19 cm, max.  =  25 cm; P. m. lodingi mean  =  25 cm, max.  =  35 cm). Pituophis taxa at higher latitudes and elevations hibernate communally and at greater depths. In contrast to Northern Pine Snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus melanoleucus), none of the pine snakes in our study excavated hibernacula beyond minimal enlargement of the preexisting chambers. These differences are presumably the result of mild winters, an abundance of suitable sites offering sufficient thermal insulation, and reduced predation risk caused by absence of communal hibernation in traditional sites. It is increasingly apparent that, throughout their annual cycle, pine snakes are dependent upon fire-maintained pine ecosystems.

D. C. Rudolph, R. R. Schaefer, S. J. Burgdorf, M. Duran, and R. N. Conner "Pine Snake (Pituophis Ruthveni and Pituophis Melanoleucus Lodingi) Hibernacula," Journal of Herpetology 41(4), 560-565, (1 December 2007). https://doi.org/10.1670/06-235.1
Accepted: 1 May 2007; Published: 1 December 2007
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top