In “The Taxonomic Status of Florida Caiman: A Molecular Reappraisal,” which appeared in Journal of Herpetology 55(3) on pages 279 to 284, the fourth paragraph on page 281 read:

The records of P. palpebrosus and P. trigonatus from Florida also deserve clarification. The identification reported by Krysko et al. (2011) is incorrect. The specimen UF-Herp-153469 identified as P. trigonatus is actually P. palpebrosus, whereas UF-Herp-175564 (the same as photographic voucher UF-Herp-165484) is P. trigonatus but was originally identified as P. palpebrosus.

The text should read:

The identification of Paleosuchus from Florida deserves clarification. Krysko et al. (2011) identified UF-Herp-153469 as P. palpebrosus, and UF-Herp-175564 (the same as photographic voucher UF-Herp-165484) as P. trigonatus. Subsequently, Krysko et al. (2016) reported that both individuals were P. trigonatus. Based on our genetic analyses, both species were introduced in Florida; however, UF-Herp-175564 is P. palpebrosus, and UF-Herp-153469 is P. trigonatus.