Translator Disclaimer
1 May 2011 Impact of Insecticides on Parasitoids of the Leafminer, Liriomyza trifolii, in Pepper in South Texas
Ricardo Hernández, Marvin Harris, Tong-Xian Liu
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Liriomyza leafminers (Diptera: Agromyzidae) are cosmopolitan, polyphagous pests of horticultural plants and many are resistant to insecticides. Producers in South Texas rely on insecticides as the primary management tool for leafminers, and several compounds are available. The objective of this study is to address the efficacy of these compounds for controlling Liriomyza while minimizing their effects against natural enemies. Research plots were established at Texas AgriLife research center at Weslaco, Texas in fall 2007 and spring 2008 seasons, and peppers were used as a model crop. Plots were sprayed with novaluron, abamectin, spinetoram, lambda-cyhalothrin and water as treatments according to leafminer infestation; insecticide efficacy was monitored by collecting leaves and infested foliage. Plant phenology was also monitored. Novaluron was the most effective insecticide and lambda-cyhalothrin showed resurgence in leafminer density in fall 2007 and no reduction in spring 2008. Other compounds varied in efficacy. Novaluron showed the least number of parasitoids per leafminer larva and the lowest parasitoid diversity index among treatments followed by spinetoram. Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) was the sole leafminer species on peppers, and 19 parasitoid species were found associated with this leafminer. Application of these insecticides for management of leafminers with conservation of natural enemies is discussed.

Introduction

Liriomyza (Diptera: Agromyzidae) leafminer adults and larvae can directly damage plants as follows: The adult female punctures plant tissue with its ovipositor, which can insert an egg and/or create an open wound to allow the adult to feed on the exudate (Dimetry 1971; Bethke and Parella 1985; Parella 1987). Neonate larvae start tunneling primarily in the palisade mesophyll and complete the feeding period during four instars within the leaf (Dimetry 1971; Parella et al. 1985). Larval tunneling damages the plant by reducing the plant's photosynthetic capacity, causing leaf abscission (Parrella 1987), death of young seedlings (Elmore and Ranney 1954), reduced aesthetics (Parrella et al. 1985), transmission of diseases (Zitter and Tsai 1977) and decline of crop yields (Wolfenbarger 1954; Ledieu and Heyler 1985; Weintraub and Horowitz 1995).

Liriomyza leafminers feed on plants in many families including Umbelliferae, Solanaceae, Malvaceae, Liliaceae, Leguminosae, Curcurbitaceae, Compositae, and Chenopodiaceae (Stegmaier 1966). In South Texas, Liriomyza attacks many agricultural crops including celery, tomato, melon, cucumber, watermelon, cotton, and, in particular, pepper. The principal method for the control of Liriomyza leafminers in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas is application of various insecticides with various modes of action in a variety of formulations. These include pyrethroids, avermectins, cyromazine, methamidophos, spinosyn and neem-based insecticides (azadirachtin) (Schuster and Everett 1983; Trumble 1984; Hara 1986; Keil and Parrella 1990; Weintraub and Horowitz 1997; Mujica et al. 2000; Civelek and Weintraub 2003; Ferguson 2004). Several insecticide applications each season are applied in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas to control Liriomyza (Hernandez et al. 2010; Liu unpublished data).

Extensive use of insecticides has resulted in development of resistance of many species of Liriomyza to many active ingredients such as those found in pyrethroids, methamidophos (Keil and Parrella 1990), avermectins, cyromazine, and spinosyn (Keil and Parrella 1990; Ferguson 2004). In addition, insecticide applications have negatively affected survival and fitness of natural enemies of Liriomyza (Trumble and Toscano 1983; Darvas and Polgar 1998; Weintraub 2001; Prijono et al. 2004; Bjorksten and Robinson 2005; Hidrayani et al. 2005; Kaspi and Parrella 2005; Tran et al. 2005; Hossain and Poehling 2006).

Some of the commonly used insecticides in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas are novaluron, spinetoram, abamectin and lambda-cyhalothrin. Novaluron (1-[chloro-4-(1, 1, 2-trifluoro-methoxyethoxy) phenyl]-3-(2, 6-difluorobenzoyl) is a benzoylphenyl urea that inhibits chitin development (Ishaaya and Casida 1974), causes unsuccessful endocuticular deposition and disrupts molting (Mulder and Gijswijk 1973). It acts primarily by ingestion, but also has some contact and translaminar activities (Ishaaya et al. 2003). Spinetoram (mixture of spinosyn A and spinosyn D) is a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist. This insecticide belongs to the family of spinosyns and causes disruption of the central nervous system by hyperexcitation (Sparks et al. 2001). Abamectin (avermectin B1a and avermectin B1b) is a macrocyclic lactone, and targets the nervous system as a chloride channel activator. Avermectins bind to ligand-gated chloride channels (e.g., GABA or glutamate) where they cause inhibition of nerve firing (Bloomquist 2003; Brown 2005). Lambdacyhalothrin ([1a(S*),3a(Z)]-(±)-cyano-(3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl-3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoro-1-propenyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate) is a pyrethroid insecticide, which acts on the nervous system as a sodium channel modulator. This axonic poison prevents sodium channels from closing, causing over-excitation and subsequent paralysis (Narahashi 1971).

Table 1.

Treatments, general mode of action and application rates.

t01_01.gif

The objective of this research was to evaluate the different insecticides commonly used for control of Liriomyza, their efficacy in controlling leafminers in the field, and their effects on the natural enemies of leafminers.

Materials and Methods

Plot design

Field plots were established at the Research Farm, Texas AgriLife Research Center at Weslaco, Texas (26° 09′33.01″ N, 97° 57′32.67″ W) in fall 2007 and spring 2008 growing seasons. Plots (9.1 m × 20.4 m) were arranged in a randomized complete block design. Two rows of sorghum were planted as windbreak between the plots to avoid insecticide drift among the treatments. The pepper variety used was Jalapeño M (Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Oxnard, CA) and the seeds were planted inside a greenhouse with a management program similar to the one used by farmers. After the plants reached the fourth true leaf stage, they were transplanted in a single row in the plots at a spacing of 12 cm. The plots were drip-irrigated and fertilized and chemical insecticide was applied in the experimental treatments (see below) along with an untreated control.

Treatments

In fall 2007 and spring 2008, four insecticides (abamectin, novaluron, spinetoram and lambda-cyhalothrin) were applied to peppers as treatments and water was used as the control (total of 5 treatments). Treatments were replicated three times (n=15 plots) in fall 2007 and four times (n=20 plots) in spring 2008. Plots were treated with insecticides using the company recommended rates (Table 1).

In order to avoid insecticide drift, wind was monitored before application with a hand wind speed sensor and no application was made if the wind speed was >4.5 kph. The chemical sprayer was calibrated to deliver 188 liters per ha, with 13 nozzles separated at 51 cm (TeeJet 8002VS) delivering 372 ml/30 sec/nozzle. Applications were made according to leafminer infestation density of 3 mines per leaf in the middle of the plant. In fall 2007, two applications were made, one on 26 October 2007, and a second one on 25 November 2007. In spring 2008 the leafminer infestation was less severe requiring only one application on 8 April 2008.

Sampling methods

Two methods were used to sample the plots. For method one, stratified leaf sampling was used to determine insecticide efficacy in controlling leafminers. Leaves were randomly selected from each stratum at the bottom (10), median (10), and top (10) portion of the plant in each plot (15 plots, 450 leaves) bi-weekly. The samples were taken from interior plants 2m from the border in each plot to minimize any “edge effect.” This spacing was in addition to a row of sorghum separating the plots (1 m). The 10 leaves from each stratum were placed in 1 gal zipper bags. The bags were labeled according to treatment, transported to the laboratory, and processed for emergence of specimens. The leaves were examined and occupied mines, empty mines and larvae were recorded.

Leaves were separated on a paper towel, then placed back into the bag with a spacer cup in the middle to prevent the top of the bag from touching the leaves. The bags were closed, and cotton balls were placed at the closing corner of the zipper bag to allow air diffusion. The bags were held in an insectary at 28° C, at a photoperiod of 11:13 (L:D) h. Bag interiors were checked for adult emergence every 10 days (30 days total) and leafminers and parasitoids were collected, and identified to species. The leafminer density per treatment through time was calculated. In addition, insecticide efficacy compared to the untreated control was also calculated.

For method two, infested foliage sampling was used to compute the number of parasitoids per leafminer larva, and compare the parasitoid species diversity among the different treatments to evaluate the effects of treatments on natural enemies. Infested foliage was identified and ten mined-leaves with larvae were collected from each plot at 2-week intervals. The leaves were placed in plastic zipper bags and processed as above. The number of larvae, mines, emerged leafminers, and emerged parasitoids were recorded. The leafminer species attacking pepper, parasitoid species composition, and the biodiversity among treatments was also determined.

Parasitoids per leafminer larva (mean number of parasitoids/mean number of leafminer larvae) were calculated in order to monitor the effects of insecticides on the parasitoid larvae. This ratio was calculated instead of percent parasitism to avoid numerical biases from gregarious parasitoid species.

Data analysis

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) using GLM procedure (alpha=0.1) was used to compare leafminer density among treatments on each sampling date. Insecticidal effects were calculated using Abbott's formula (density of control — density of treatment / density of control) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) (GLM procedure; alpha =0.1) were used to compare insecticide efficacy per treatment in the fall 2007 and spring 2008 samples (SAS institute 2000). Ratios of parasitoids per leafminer larva (i.e., mean number of parasitoids/mean number of leafminer larvae) were calculated to determine the effects of insecticides on parasitoid species attacking larvae. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) (GLM procedure alpha= 0.1) was used to compare parasitoid(s) per leafminer larva among different treatments on each date sampled. Furthermore, Shannon-Wiener diversity index,

fi01_01.gif

was calculated per treatment to analyze the effects of different insecticides on parasitoid diversity. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) (GLM procedure alpha 0.1) was used to compare H' among treatments (SAS institute 2000).

Results

Table 2.

Leafminer density statistics values for fall 2007 and spring 2008.

t02_01.gif

Evaluation of insecticides for leafminer management

In fall 2007, treatment with novaluron resulted in lower leafminer larval density per plant compared to the control at 7 and 17 days after the first application (Figure 1, Table 2). After a second application, a similar trend was measured on 30 November and 13 December 2007 when novaluron had the lowest larvae per plant among treatments. Novaluron was the only insecticide producing significantly lower density of larval leafminers than the control at 25 and 35 days after the second application. No statistically significant differences in density between the novaluron treatment and the control were measured in the spring 2008 experiment, except at the first evaluation on 16 April (Figure 2, Table 2).

Treatment with spinetoram resulted in lower leafminer larval density per plant than the control 7 d from first application in fall 2007. Similarly, the treatment with spinetoram produced lower larval density per plant than in either the control abamectin, or lambdacyhalothrin treatments after the second application on 30 November 2007 and 13 December 2007. Furthermore, larval density in the spinetoram treated plants increased from 13 December 2007 to 20 December 2007 (F = 14.16; df = 7, 3; P < 0.0001). The plants treated with spinetoram reduced leafminer density; however density increased in the following samples compared to novaluron (Figure 1, Table 2). The plants treated with spinetoram also had lower leafminer density compared to the control after the first application on 8 April 2008. No statistically significant differences were shown by subsequent samplings (Figure 2, Table 2).

Treatment with abamectin had no statistically significant effect on densities of leafminer larvae relative to the untreated control in the fall of 2007. In addition, leafminer densities increased on plants treated with abamectin (F = 12.17; df = 7, 3; P < 0.0001) from sample day 30 November to sample day 13 December 2007 (Figure 1, Table 2). In spring 2008, after the first application on 8 April, the plants treated with abamectin had lower leafminer density than those in the untreated control. Leafminer density on the plants treated with abamectin was not statistically different from the control beginning 22 days after application through the end of the experiment (Figure 2, Table 2).

In fall of 2007, plants treated with lambdacyhalothrin not show statistically significant effects in comparison to the untreated control seven days after the first application. Subsequently, densities of Liriomyza on plants treated with lambda-cyhalothrin were significantly higher than those in all treatments including the control 17 days after the first application. The leafminer density on the plants treated with lambda-cyhalothrin was statistically higher than those in the untreated control on 30 November and 13 December 2007 after the second application. In addition, an increase in leafminer density was recorded in the lambda-cyhalothrin treatment from 30 November to 13 December 2007 (F = 17.56; df = 7, 3; P < 0.0001). On 20 December 2007, the plants treated with lambda-cyhalothrin had a higher density than the untreated control, but were not significantly different on 10 January 2008 (Figure 1, Table 2). In spring 2008, lambda-cyhalothrin did not have an effect on leafminer density compared to the control (Figure 2, Table 2).

Table 3.

Shannon-Wiener diversity index for fall 2007 and spring 2008.

t03_01.gif

Based on calculations of total insecticide efficacy, in fall 2007, the most effective insecticide was novaluron followed by spinetoram (Figure 3). No effect on leafminers was measured following treatment with abamectin., whereas plants treated with lambda-cyhalothrin had increased leafminer density (F = 19.11; df = 3, 3; P < 0.0001) (Figure 3). In spring 2008, plants treated with novaluron had the lowest leafminer density, which was significantly lower than on those treated with lambda-cyhalothrin (F = 1.38; df = 3, 3; P < 0.2790) (Figure 4).

Insecticide effects on natural enemies

Effects of insecticides on ratios of parasitoids to leafminer larvae were mixed and dependent on insecticide and sampling date (Figure 5). In fall 2007, the plants treated with novaluron and spinetoram had significantly lower densities of parasitoids per leafminer larva ratios than those in the untreated control 16 days after the first application (12 November 2007). The plants treated with abamectin and lambda-cyhalothrin did not show differences from the untreated control (F = 6.38; df = 4, 3; P < 0.0081) (Figure 5). The plants treated with novaluron showed a lower parasitoid/leafminer larva ratio after the second application on 13 December 2007 (F=3.64; df=4, 3; P<0.0442) 20 December 2007 (F=4.48; df=4, 3; P<.0.0247), and 10 January 2008 (F=1.20; dj=4, 3; P<0.3697). In spring 2008, the plants treated with novaluron had a lower parasitoid/leafminer ratio 8 days after the first application (16 April 2008) (F=2.65; df=4, 3; P<0.0747) (Figure 6). Twelve days after application (30 April 2008), the plants treated with spinetoram and novaluron had a lower parasitoid/leafminer larva ratio (F=1.60; dj=4, 3; P<0.2245). In fall 2007, the untreated plants had the highest Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H') (Table 3). In addition, spinetoram and novaluron were the only two insecticides with statistically lower indices compared to the untreated control. Novaluron had the lowest diversity index in fall 2007 (F=5.37; df=4, 3; P<0.0029). In spring 2008, the H' in the untreated control was numerically higher than other treatments (Table 3); however no significant differences were found among treatments (F=0.80; df=4, 3; P<0.5349).

Liriomyza and parasitoid species composition

The Liriomyza species composition in the fall of 2007 was found to be 454 specimens of L. trifolii (Burgess), one L. sativae Blanchard, and 33 specimens were unidentifiable due to the lack of useful morphological characters. In spring 2008, 144 specimens were identified as L. trifolii and 23 specimens were unidentifiable. Liriomyza sativae was not found in spring 2008.

Table 4.

Parasitoid species composition in the fall 2007 and spring 2008 from leafminer infested leaves.

t04_01.gif

A total of 438 parasitoid specimens representing 13 species were collected in fall 2007 (Table 4). These included Neochrysocharis formosa (Westwood) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) (278 individuals collected), Closterocerus cinctipennis Ashmead ( (41), Diglyphus isaea (Walker) (12), Cirrospilus spp. (30), and Asecodes spp. (3) from the Eulophidae family, and Opius dissitus Muesebeck (21), O. dimidiatus (Ashmead) (3), O. nr browsvillensis (7), and Opius spp 1 (1), from the Braconidae family. In addition, Ganaspidium pusillae Weld (4), G. nigrimanus (Kieffer) (39), and Agrostocynips robusta (Ashmead) (3) were identified from from the family Figitidae, and Halticoptera circulus (Walker) (20) from the family Pteromalidae.

A total of 620 parasitoid specimens representing 16 species were collected in spring of 2008 (Table 4). These included N. formosa (351), C. cinctipennis (28), D. isaea (32), Pnigalio spp. (13), Cirrospilus variegates (46), Zogrammosoma spp. (2), Chrysocharis spp (10), from the family Eulophidae, and O. dissitus (59), O. dimidiatus (9), O. nr browsvillensis (8), O. bruneipes (15), and Opius spp 2 (4), from the family Braconidae. In addition, G. pusillae (19), G. nigrimanus (17), A. robusta (1), and Disorygma pacifica (Yoshimoto) (6) were identified from the family Figitidae.

Discussion

The main difference between the fall 2007 and the spring 2008 trials was in leafminer density, which reached 300 leafminers per plant in fall 2007 in contrast to ∼15 leafminers per plant in spring 2008. This was mainly because crop production, climate and population dynamics of the pests and parasitoids in this area also differ between spring and fall. Novaluron was effective against leafminers in both trials, whereas treatment with lambda-cyhalothrin increased (fall 2007) or had no measureable effect (spring 2008) on leafminer density. Spinetoram was also effective against leafminers, whereas efficacy of abamectin varied in both seasons. Novaluron was the most effective insecticide as shown by low leafminer densities in both fall 2007 and spring 2008. At this time, resistance to novaluron has not been documented in populations of Liriomyza in South Texas.

Although resistance of Liriomyza species to spinosad has been documented (Ferguson 2004), spinetoram was effective in this field evaluation and reduced Liriomyza densities after applications in fall 2007 and spring 2008. However, its efficacy was lower than that of novaluron. In fall 2007, leafminer density in spinetoram- treated plots increased from 13 to 20 December 2007 and in spring 2008, leafminer density in the spinetoram treatment was higher compared to novaluron on 30 April 2008. This lower efficacy may be influenced by the effects of spinetoram on natural enemies, or lower plant residues for control of emerging leafminers.

Mixed results were measured in tests with abamectin. In fall 2007, overall efficacy of abamectin was nil. However, in spring 2008 when leafminer densities were lower, abamectin reduced leafminer density after application and appeared effective. Liriomyza resistance to abamectin has been documented (Ferguson 2004). Abamectin is a widely used insecticide in South Texas primarily for the control of mites and to a lesser extent for the control of Liriomyza leafminers. More detailed studies need to be conducted to determine the status of Liriomyza vis à vis abamectin resistance and efficacy in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas.

In tests with lambda- cyhalothrin, densities of larval Liriomyza were either increased or unchanged relative to the controls. In addition to negative effects of lambda- cyhalothrin on natural enemies (e.g., lethal, sublethal, repellant), a possible explanation for this finding (and the low efficacy of this insecticide) may be resistance to pyrethroids in L. trifolii.. Several agricultural pests (including leafminers in the Lower Rio Grande Valley) are resistant to pyrethroids, including lambda- cyhalothrin. Thus, additional studies on the resistance to lambdacyhalothrin in L. trifolii from the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas may help to explain the increase of Liriomyza density in this area.

Based on the field data, novaluron had negative effects on immature parasitoid stages. Novaluron toxicity may directly or indirectly affect parasitoids because it was effective against the Liriomyza leafminers. Although no research has been done on this insecticide's effects on natural enemies of Liriomyza leafminers, Bastos et al. (2006) tested its effect on Trichogramma pretiosum Riley, parasitizing the Mediterranean flour moth [Ephestia kuehniella (Zeller)], and found that novaluron did not affect the adult parasitoids, but interfered with development of immature stages within the host egg. Spinetoram also negatively affects parasitoid immature stages, and previous research has shown that this insecticide is harmful to natural enemies (Hossain and Poehling 2006). However, our data suggest that it was no more toxic to the parasitoid complex compared to the untreated control. In this regard, more laboratory or field experiments should be conducted to assess the toxicity of spinetoram to parasitoids of leafminers in South Texas. In results from a separate study, insecticides tested here were shown to have differing effects on the adult parasitoids. For example, novaluron was the least toxic, whereas abamectin had significant mortality and spinetoram was the most toxic (Hernández and Liu, unpublished results). Effects of lambda-cyhalothrin on adults differed between species: it was toxic to G. nigrimanus (a larval-pupal parasitoid of Liriomyza) but had no effect on N. formosa. Neochrysocharis formosa was the most abundant parasitoid in the survey. N. formosa is a larval parasitoid and has a close association with larval leafminers. This association could potentially have resulted in an evolved parasitoid tolerance to the compound. N. formosa represented 60% of the total parasitoids collected and a developed tolerance of N. formosa to lambda-cyhalothrin could explain the lack of a difference in parasitoid abundance and diversity between the control and lambda-cyhalothrin in the research plots. Natural enemy diversity is an important factor in evaluating conservation biological control (Altieri 1999, Landis et al. 2000, Cai et al. 2007).

Liriomyza trifolii damaged Jalapeño M in the insecticide plots. It accounted for 99 percent of the identified specimens. The parasitoid per leafminer ratio was much higher in spring 2008 than fall 2007. The higher abundance of parasitoids in spring 2008, potentially contributed to the lower densities of leafminers in the experimental plots observed during this season.

In summary, this study shows that a diverse group of hymenopterous parasitoids is associated with Liriomyza in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas and they, at times, play a role in the economic suppression of infestations. We expect density dependant responses and the relative searching abilities of these parasitoids may also be affecting how this parasitoid complex responds to various treatments. Partitioning the effects of insecticides and parasitoids on leafminer density is challenging. Leafminer densities in the fall of 2007 triggered two insecticide treatments using our action level of 3 mines per leaf in the middle of the plant; leafminer densities increased after treatment and on the last fall sampling date were economically damaging with only the novaluron treatment providing control. Leafminer densities in the spring of 2008 triggered one insecticide treatment, however, leafminer densities on subsequent spring sampling dates did not increase as they had in the fall to economically damaging levels in any treatment, including the control. These factors should be considered when interpreting these data. For example, the low leafminer densities and the low parasitoid diversity in the fall of 2007 novaluron treatment may be due to a direct effect of the insecticide on Liriomyza, which reduces parasitoid density through lack of prey, or a combined toxicity to Liriomyza and to the parasitoids, or some combination of both. This issue is less relevant in the spring of 2008 because economic densities of leafminers did not continue as they had in the fall to actually cause economic damage. Further work is needed in this area.

The leafminer species Liriomyza trifolii exhibits such a long history of insecticide resistance that it is doubtful that the use of insecticides will provide sustainable control, even if new, effective insecticides with novel modes of action are found. We recommend avoidance of insecticide application whenever possible to conserve natural enemies. If insecticide application is required, a one time application of novaluron should be used to control L. trifolii outbreaks. Use of insecticides must be integrated with biological controls. If an infestation requires more applications, an insecticide rotation program should be planned to avoid/delay development of resistance. Lambda-cyhalothrin, which is ineffective in controlling L. trifolii, should be avoided.

Figure 1.

Leafminer larval density per plant in fall 2007. Arrows represent application date. Different letters represent statistical differences among treatments. Star (*) represents significant statistical differences from previous sample date within treatments. High quality figures are available online.

f01_01.jpg

Figure 2.

Leafminer larval density per plant in spring 2008. Arrows represent application date. Different letters represent statistical differences among treatments. Star (*) represents significant statistical differences from previous sample date within treatments. High quality figures are available online.

f02_01.jpg

Figure 3.

Percent efficacy compared to control in fall 2007. Different letters represent significant statistical differences among treatments. High quality figures are available online.

f03_01.jpg

Figure 4.

Percent efficacy compared to control in spring 2008. Different letters represent significant statistical differences among treatments. High quality figures are available online.

f04_01.jpg

Figure 5.

Ratio of parasitoids per leafminer larva in fall 2007. Arrows represent application date. Different letters represent significant statistical differences among treatments. High quality figures are available online.

f05_01.jpg

Figure 6.

Ratio of parasitoids per leafminer larva in spring 2008. Arrows represent application date. Different letters represent significant statistical differences among treatments. High quality figures are available online.

f06_01.jpg

Acknowledgements

Special Thanks to Mamoudou Sétamou (Texas A&M Kingsville, Citrus Center, Weslaco, Texas) for his critical input on the statistical analysis and J. Da Graca (Citrus Center, Weslaco, Texas) for his critical review of an early version of this manuscript. Our thanks also extended to Robert Wharton (Entomology Department, Texas A&M University, College Station TX), Chao-Dong Zhu (Institute of Zoology Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China), Matthew Buffington (Systematic Entomology Lab, USDA/ARS NMNH, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D. C.), Steve Heydon (R.M. Bohart Museum, Department of Entomology, University of California, Davis, CA), and Zhongren Lei (Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China) for identification of Liriomyza spp. and parasitoids.

References

1.

M Ahmad , M Arif , Z Ahmad , I Denholm . 2002. Cotton whitefly (Bemesia tabaci) resistance to organophosphate and pyrethroid in Pakistan. Pest Management Science 58: 203–208. Google Scholar

2.

AM Altieri . 1999. The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 74: 19–31. Google Scholar

3.

CS Bastos , RP Almeida , FA de Suinaga . 2006. Selectivity of pesticides used on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) to Trichogramma pretiosum reared on two laboratory-reared hosts. Pest Management Science 62: 91–98. Google Scholar

4.

JA Bethke , MP Parrella . 1985. Leaf puncturing, feeding and oviposition behavior of Liriomyza trifolii. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 39: 149–154. Google Scholar

5.

AT Bjorksten , M Robinson . 2005. Juvenile and sublethal effects of selected pesticides on the leafminer parasitoid Hemiptarsenus varicornis and Diglyphus isaea (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) from Australia. Journal of Economic Entomology 98: 1831–1838. Google Scholar

6.

JR Bloomquist . 2003. Chloride channels as tools for developing selective insecticides. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 53: 145–156. Google Scholar

7.

AE Brown . 2005. Mode of action of structural pest control chemicals. Pesticide information Maryland Cooperative Extension, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Maryland , Clinton, MD, USA . Leaflet No.41. Google Scholar

8.

HJ Cai , Z S Li , MS You . 2007. Impact of habitat diversification on arthropod communities: a study in the fields of Chinese cabbage, Brassica chinensis. Insect Science 14: 241–249. Google Scholar

9.

PG Civelek , PG Weintraub . 2003. Effects of bensultap on larval serpentine leafminers, Liriomyza tirfolii (Burgess) (Diptera: Agromyzidae), in tomatoes. Crop Protection 22: 479–483. Google Scholar

10.

LD Chandler . 1982. Parasitization of cantaloupe infesting agromyzid leafminers in the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas. Southwestern Entomologist 7: 94–97. Google Scholar

11.

LD Chandler . 1984. Parasites of Liriomyza sativae Blanchard on bell peppers in South Texas. Journal of Georgia Entomological Society 19: 199–203. Google Scholar

12.

B Darvas , LA Polgar . 1998. Novel type insecticides: specificity and effects on non-target organism. In: I. Ishaaya , and D. Degheele , editors. Insecticides with novel modes of action, mechanism and application, pp. 188–259. Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar

13.

NZ Dimetry . 1971. Biological studies on a leaf mining Diptera, Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) attacking beans in Egypt. Bulletin of Entomological Society of Egypt 55: 23–30. Google Scholar

14.

JC Elmore , CAJ Ranney . 1954. Injury to pepper plants by the pea leafminer. Journal of Economic Entomology 47: 357–358. Google Scholar

15.

SJ Ferguson . 2004. Development and stability of insecticide resistance in the leafminer Liriomyza trifolii (Diptera: Agromyzidae) to cyromazine, abamectin, and spinosad. Journal of Economic Entomology 97: 112–119. Google Scholar

16.

AH Hara . 1986. Effects of certain insecticides on Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) (Diptera: Agromyzidae) and its parasitoids on chrysanthemum in Hawaii. Proceedings of Hawaii Entomological Society 26: 65–70. Google Scholar

17.

R Hernández , M Harris , T-X Liu . 2010. Liriomyza (Diptera: Agromyzidae) and parasitoid species on pepper in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas. Southwestern Entomologist 35: 33–43. Google Scholar

18.

P Hidrayani , A Rauf , P Ridland , AA Hoffmann . 2005. Pesticide applications on Java potato fields are ineffective in controlling leafminers, and have antagonistic effects on natural enemies of leafminers. International Journal of Pest Management 51: 181–187. Google Scholar

19.

MB Hossain , HM Poehling . 2006. Non-target effects of three biorationale insecticides on two endolarval parasitoids of Liriomyza sativae (Dipt. Agromyzidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 130: 360–367. Google Scholar

20.

I Ishaaya , JE Casida . 1974. Dietary TH 6040 alters composition and enzyme activity of house fly larval cuticle. Pesticide Biochemistry & Physiology 4: 484–490. Google Scholar

21.

I Ishaaya , S Kontsedalov , AR Horowitz . 2003. Novaluron (Rimon), a novel IGR: potency and cross-resistance. Archive of Insect Biochemistry & Physiology 54: 157–164. Google Scholar

22.

R Kaspi , MP Parrella . 2005. Abamectin compatibility with the leafminer parasitoid Diglyphus isae. Biological Control 35: 172–179. Google Scholar

23.

CB Keil , MP Parrella . 1990. Characterization of insecticide resistance in two colonies of Liriomyza trifolii (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 83: 1–26. Google Scholar

24.

A D Landis , D S Wratten , MG Gurr . 2000. Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology 45: 175–201. Google Scholar

25.

MS Ledieu , NL Heyler . 1985. Observations on the economic importance of tomato leafminer (Liriomyza bryoniae) (Agromyzidae). Agricultural Ecosystem & Environment 13: 103–109. Google Scholar

26.

N Mujica , M Pravatiner , F Cisneros . 2000. Effectiveness of abamectin and plant-oil mixtures on eggs and larvae of the leafminer fly, Liriomyza huidobrensis Blanchard. CIP Program Report 1999–2000, 161–166. Google Scholar

27.

R Mulder , MT Gijswijk . 1973. The laboratory evaluation of two promising new insecticides which interfere with cuticle deposition. Pesticide Science 4: 473–745. Google Scholar

28.

T Narahashi . 1971. Mode of action of pyrethroids. Bulletin of World Health Organization 44: 337–345. Google Scholar

29.

MP Parrella . 1987. Biology of Liriomyza. Annual Review of Entomology 32: 201–224. Google Scholar

30.

MP Parrella , VP Jones , RR Youngman , LM Lebeck . 1985. Effect of leaf mining and leaf stippling of Liriomyza spp. on photosynthetic rates of chrysanthemum. Annals of Entomological Society of America 78: 90–93. Google Scholar

31.

D Prijono , M Robinson , A Rauf , T Bjorksten , AA Hoffmann . 2004. Toxicity of chemicals commonly used in Indonesia vegetable crops to Liriomyza huidobrensis populations and the Indonesian parasitoids Hemiptarsenus varicornis, Opius sp., and Gronotoma micromorpha, as well as the Australian parasitoids Hemiptarsenus varicornis and Dyglyphus isaea. Journal of Economic Entomology 97: 1191–1197. Google Scholar

32.

MM Rodriguez , J Bisset , D Molina , L Lauzan , A Soca . 2001. Detection of insecticide resistance in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) from Cuba and Venezuela. Journal of Medical Entomology 38: 623–628. Google Scholar

33.

SAS Institute 2000. SAS/STAT version 8.0. SAS InstituteGoogle Scholar

34.

DJ Schuster , PH Everftt . 1983. Response of Liriomyza trifolii (Diptera: Agromyzidae) to insecticides on tomato. Journal of Economic Entomology 76: 1170–1174. Google Scholar

35.

TC Sparks , GD Crouse , D Gregory . 2001. Natural products as insecticides: the biology, biochemistry and quantitative structure-activity relationships of spinosyns and spinosoids. Pest Management Science 57: 896–905. Google Scholar

36.

CE Stegmaier . 1966. Host plants and parasites of Liriomyza trifolii in Florida (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Florida Entomologist 49:75–80. Google Scholar

37.

DH Tran , M Takagi , K Takasu . 2005. Toxicity of Selective Insecticides to Neochrysocharis formosa (Westwood) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a parasitoid of the American serpentine leafminer Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) (Diptera: Agromizydae). Journal of Faculty of Agriculture. Kyushu University 50: 109–118. Google Scholar

38.

JT Trumble . 1984. Integrated pest management of Liriomyza trifolii: influence of avermectin, cyromazine, and methomyl on leafminer ecology in celery. Agriculture Ecosystem & Environment 12: 181–188. Google Scholar

39.

JT Trumble , NC Toscano . 1983. Impact of methanidophos and methomyl on populations of Liriomyza species (Diptera: Agromyzidae) and associated parasites in celery. Canadian Entomologist 115: 1415–1420. Google Scholar

40.

PG Weintraub . 2001. Effects of cyromazine and abamectin on the pea leafminer Liriomyza huidobrensis (Diptera: Agromyzidae) and its parasitoid Diglyphus isaea (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in potatoes. Crop Protection 20: 207–213. Google Scholar

41.

PG Weintraub , AR Horowitz . 1995. The newest leafminer pest in Israel, Liriomyza huidobrensis. Phytoparasitica 23: 177–184. Google Scholar

42.

PG Weintraub , AR Horowitz . 1997. Systemic effects of a neem insecticide on Liriomyza huidobrensis larvae. Phytoparasitica 25: 283–289. Google Scholar

43.

DO Wolfenbarger . 1954. Potato yields associated with control of aphids and the serpentine leafminer. Florida Entomologist 37: 7–12. Google Scholar

44.

TA Zitter , JH Tsai . 1977. Transmission of three potyviruses by the leafminer Liriomyza sativae (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Plant Disease 61: 1025–1029. Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
Ricardo Hernández, Marvin Harris, and Tong-Xian Liu "Impact of Insecticides on Parasitoids of the Leafminer, Liriomyza trifolii, in Pepper in South Texas," Journal of Insect Science 11(61), 1-14, (1 May 2011). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.011.6101
Received: 21 April 2010; Accepted: 1 September 2010; Published: 1 May 2011
JOURNAL ARTICLE
14 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top