Translator Disclaimer
9 February 2012 Measurement of Time Taken by the Formosan Termite, Coptotermes formosanus, to Pass Tunnel Intersections
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Subterranean termites build complex tunnel networks below ground for foraging. During the foraging activity, termites may encounter a considerable number of tunnel intersections. When they encounter the intersections, they spend some time gathering information for making a decision regarding their moving direction by anntenation. The spent time is likely to be directly connected to the termites' survival because depending on the time, the total traveling time taken by the termites for transferring food resources from the site of food to their nest can vary significantly because of many intersections. In the present study, we measured the time spent by a termite to pass an intersection with widths of W1 and W2 (W1 and W2: 2, 3, or 4 mm); τL, τR , and τs are the passing time for turning left, turning right, and going straight, respectively. W1 represents the width of the tunnel in which the termites advanced, and W2 represents the width of the other tunnel encountered by the advancing termites. For the combinations of W1 and W2, (W1, W2) = (2, 2), (3, 3), (2, 3), (2, 4), (3, 4), and (4, 3), the values of L, τR, and τs in each case were statistically equal. For (W1, W2) = (3, 2), (4, 2), and (4, 4), τs was shorter than τR and τR in each case. The experimental results are briefly discussed in relation to the termite foraging efficiency.

Introduction

Subterranean termites forage for food resources by constructing tunnel networks below ground. The network geometry reflects a compromise between the foraging efficiency and other biological and/or ecological constraints such as the number of active foragers, soil density, and food availability (Le Comber et al. 2006; Lee et al. 2007a). Hence, understanding the tunnel network pattern may provide one important key to understanding the termite foraging behavior towards maximizing the foraging efficiency (Campora and Grace 2001; Puche and Su 2001). With simulation studies, Lee et al. (2006, 2007, 2009), Lee and Su (2009a, 2009b 2010), and Jeon et al. (2010) reported the relationship between tunnel network patterns and foraging efficiency. Thus far, most theoretical research on how a termite tunnel pattern is efficient in foraging has concentrated on the geometry of the tunnel patterns at a colony level.

In contrast, two papers (Lee et al. 2008; Ku et al. 2010) dealt with termite behavior in relation to the foraging efficiency at an individual level. Lee et al. (2008) revealed that when termites passed a corner of a bent tunnel, they moved faster in a rounded corner than in a sharp corner, which in turn improved the termite tunnel—traffic efficiency. The study of Lee et al. (2008) revealed that the traffic efficiency, defined as the termite moving speed in tunnels, is an important factor affecting the foraging efficiency. Ku et al. (2010) showed that when termites encounter tunnel intersections while traveling in the tunnel network, they selected a relatively wide tunnel. The wide paths are likely to be paths that termites more traveled, which would indicate economic paths to decrease their traveling distance from the food resources to their nest.

In the present study, as a follow—up research to that of Ku et al. (2010), we measured the time required for a termite to pass the intersection with combinations of widths (W1 and W2 : 2, 3, or 4 mm) while selecting different directions-turning left, turning right, or moving straight. The passing time could be an important factor affecting the foraging efficiency because while traveling in a tunnel network, termites are likely to encounter numerous tunnel intersections. A small time difference in selecting a different direction could accumulate to a large value of the total traveling expenses.

Materials and Methods

Formosan subterranean termites, Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae), were collected from monitoring stations by using the method of Su and Scheffrahn (1986). The collected termites were brought back to the laboratory and were separated from their stations and processed immediately in the laboratory as described by Tamashiro et al. (1973). Termites were then placed in a release chamber that contained wooden sticks (length: approximately 3 cm) as a food source. The chamber was kept at 27 ± 2 °C.

Two—dimensional foraging arenas were used for this study. The experimental arena consisted of two layers (13 × 13 cm) of clear Plexiglas (thickness: 2 mm) and a middle layer. The middle layer had a circular space (diameter: 10 cm; height: 2 mm). A hole (1.5 cm diameter) was drilled on the top and middle layers of the arena to allow termite entry. The 2 mm gap between the Plexiglas sheets were filled with sifted sand (0.3–0.35 mm, sieved) moistened with deionized water (approximately 7% sand by weight). The sand in the middle layer was compacted to a bulk density of approximately 1.3 g/cm3.

After opening the top layer, two tunnels intersecting at a 90° angle in the sand substrate were carefully excavated using a sharp cutting knife which took less than one minute. As soon as the excavation was complete, the top layer was covered to minimize moisture evaporation. The ends of the two tunnels were connected to the introduction holes, and the tunnels had varying widths of W1 and W2 (i.e., 2, 3, or 4 mm), where W1 represents the width of the tunnel in which the termites advanced, and W2 represents the width of the other tunnel encountered by the advancing termites (Figure 1).

Three to eight replications were carried out for each combination of W1 and W2 (W1, W2 ). Each arena was placed in a horizontal position in a room kept at 26 °C. Forty workers plus 4 soldier termites were introduced into the arena through the introduction hole. The holes were then covered with plastic plugs to prevent airflow. The 44 termites were allowed to acclimatize to their new environment for 20 min. After this period, their movements were continuously recorded for one hour with a digital camcorder mounted above the substrate. Using the recording, we measured the time, τ, taken by a termite to pass the intersections and select different directions, i.e., turning left (τL ), turning right (τR ), or moving straight (τS ). The intersection area was defined as a 10 × 10 mm square (Figure 1). Only data of worker termites that were physically uninfluenced by the other termites at the tunnel intersection were used for analysis.

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of tunnel intersection with two tunnel widths, W1 and W2. W1 represents the width of a tunnel in which a termite advances, and W2 is the width of the other tunnel. The red box represents the tunnel intersection defined in this study. High quality figures are available online.

f01_01.jpg

Results

As soon as the termites were introduced into the experimental area with a preformed tunnel intersection, they began to move along the tunnel. This behavior is likely to be escaping behavior. Thus, 10 minutes were given for termites to adapt to the arena. After the time, termite movement behavior was observed at the intersection. Some termites stopped walking and antennated laterally to touch the tunnel wall for a short period of time presumably to obtain information of the sudden change in the circumambient geometry (Lee et al. 2008), but others kept moving straight or attempted to change their moving direction without the antennation behavior. Other additional behaviors were observed. For example, some termites determined their direction at the intersection and turned their body to pass the intersection. After that, they stopped moving and began to move back to the intersection. Such kind of behavior was excluded from analysis because it occurred irregularly and difficult to characterize.

Table 1.

Mean time (seconds) ± SD for a termite to pass at the intersection of tunnels with widths of W1 (mm) and W2 (mm) in nine arenas.

t01_01.gif

For arenas in which (W1, W2 ) = (2, 2) and (3, 3), the values of τL, τR, and τs in each case were statistically the same (see Table 1). This was because the selection of different directions provided no advantage with respect to the tunnel width, and in particular, the narrow intersection area in comparison to the termite body length (∼3 mm) made walking difficult, which in turn diluted the time difference in selecting different directions. However, for (W1, W2) = (4, 4), the value of τS was significantly smaller than the values of τL and τR, while the values of τL and τR were statistically the same in each case. Most termites moving straight passed the intersection without stopping. In the case that termites advanced from a relatively narrow tunnel to the intersection connecting to wider tunnels ((W1, W2) = (2, 3), (2, 4), and (3, 4)), the values of τL, τR, and τs were statistically the same in each case. For (W1, W2) = (2, 3) and (2, 4), turning into wider tunnels at left or right may have saved time (hence τL, τR < τs), but termites also took more time to change their direction, and during the direction change at the intersection they turned their body vertically and walked on the sidewall (Figure 2). This behavior increased τL and τR, which consequently led to the result τL = τR = τS. For (W1, W2) = (3, 4), many termites turning left or right touched the right—angled corner of the intersection because of the deviation in their walking (Figure 3). As soon as the termites touched the corner, they exhibited the anntenation behavior. This diluted the advantage of the relatively large tunnel width, which consequently led to the statistically equal values of τL, τR, and τs. When the termites advanced from a relatively wide tunnel to the intersection connecting to narrower tunnels ((W1, W2) = (3, 2) and (4, 2)), the value of τs was significantly smaller than the values of τL and τR because of the same reason as the case of (W1, W2) = (4, 4).

Figure 2.

Behavior of a termite, turning its body vertically, while changing its moving direction at the intersection with the values of (2, 4). High quality figures are available online.

f02_01.jpg

Figure 3.

Photographs showing that an advancing termite is likely to be confronted with the corner of the intersection when it changes its moving direction. High quality figures are available online.

f03_01.jpg

Discussion

Previous studies (Lee et al. 2006, 2007a, 2007b, 2009a, 2009b) showed that the geometry of a termite tunnel network is closely related to foraging efficiency at the colony level. Further studies revealed that the traffic efficiency (defined as the termite's walking speed in tunnels) and the directional selection at the tunnel intersections were important factors affecting the foraging efficiency (Lee et al. 2008; Ku et al. 2010).

During foraging activity, termites encounter numerous tunnel intersections. Termites preferred to select a relatively wide tunnel at the intersections, which could be a mechanism to find the shortest path from the food resources to the nest. In the present study, we measured the time taken by a termite to pass an intersection and selecting a different direction—turning left, turning right, and moving straight. This information is important to understand termite foraging behavior in maximizing foraging efficiency. Animal foraging efficiency is determined in large part by food search and transport efficiency (Torres-Contreras and Vasquez 2004; Pyke 1978). Conceptually, the foraging efficiency for termites can be defined as the ratio of the number of encountered food resources for foraging time to the sum of the shortest length from the location of the food to the nest (Lee et al. 2007a). Thus, the measured time for each direction is directly related to the foraging efficiency because the time could be accumulated during the termites' travel in the tunnel networks. Termites spent significantly less time to pass an intersection in the case of (W1, W2 ) = (3, 2), (4, 2), and (4, 4). In the other cases, no difference in the passing time was found. When traveling in the tunnel network, termites are likely to be faced with two intersection types: W1 < W2 or W1 > W2, where W1 is the width of the tunnel where termites are present, and W2 is the width of the connecting tunnel termites may encounter. Most advancing termites faced with the case of W1 < W2 would change their moving direction at the intersection, following the relatively wide tunnel selection mechanism; subsequently, they would confront the case of W1 > W2. For an established colony, most termites in a tunnel network may travel along the relatively wide tunnels, and our results showed that termites advancing from a relatively wide tunnel into the intersection may continue going straight, which could be a viable strategy for improving the foraging efficiency. It is unknown, however, if our results are consistent with field observations because there could be many other constraining conditions associated with the physical factors such as soil hydrology and soil particle size (Su and Puche 2003). In addition to these factors, the various widths and wall roughness of a natural termite tunnels may affect the time taken by a termite to pass an intersection (Lee et al. 2008a, 2008b). Additionally, in this study, we simplified the tunnel intersections as two linear tunnels intersecting at 90°, which may be valid at the scale of termite body length (3–4 mm). Su et al. (2004) reported that the intersection angles are in the range of ∼70–90° in many cases, which support the validation of the simplification. However, for some cases we found intersection angles measuring less than 50°. Thus, the effect of the intersection angles needs to be considered. Nevertheless, results obtained in this study are valuable because they provide insights into the foraging efficiency at the individual level. These results also suggest directions for future empirical investigations of the termite foraging strategy in relation to the traffic efficiency.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Institute for Mathematical Sciences.

References

1.

CE Campora , JK. Grace 2001. Tunnel orientation and search pattern sequence of the Formosan subterranean termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 94: 1193–1199. Google Scholar

2.

W Jeon, S-Y Kang, N-Y Su, S-H Lee . 2010. The constraint condition for subterranean termites' foraging strategy. Journal of Insect Science 10: 146. Available online,  http://www.insectscience.org/10.146  Google Scholar

3.

SJ Ku , N-Y Su , S-H. Lee 2010. Directional selection by subterranean termites, Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae), at tunnel intersection. Entomological Sciences 13: 363–366. Google Scholar

4.

Comber SC Le , EW Seabloom , SS. Romanach 2006. Burrow fractal dimension and foraging success in subterranean rodents, a simulation. Behavioral Ecology 17: 188–195. Google Scholar

5.

S-H Lee , N-Y. Su 2009a. The effects of fractal landscape structure on the territory size distribution of subterranean termites: A simulation study. Journal of Korean Physical Society 54: 1697–1701. Google Scholar

6.

S-H Lee , N-Y. Su 2009b. The influence of branching tunnels on subterranean termites' foraging efficiency: Consideration for simulations. Ecological Informatics 4: 152– 155. Google Scholar

7.

S-H Lee , N-Y. Su 2010. Simulation Study on the tunnel networks of subterranean termites and the foraging behavior. Journal of AsiaPacific Entomology 13: 83–90. Google Scholar

8.

S-H Lee, N-Y Su, M. Lee 2009. Why is the number of primary tunnels of the formosan subterranean termite, Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki (Isoptera: Rhinotermidae), restricted during foraging? Journal of AsiaPacific Entomology 12: 151–154. Google Scholar

9.

S-H Lee , N-Y Su , P Bardunias , H-F. Li 2007. Food encounter rate of simulated termite tunnels in heterogeneous landscapes. Biosystems 90: 314–322. Google Scholar

10.

S-H Lee , P Bardunias , N-Y. Su 2006. Food encounter rates of simulated termite tunnels with variable food size/distribution pattern and tunnel branch length. Journal of Theoretical Biology 243: 493–500. Google Scholar

11.

S-H Lee , P Bardunias , N-Y. Su 2007a. Optimal length distribution of termite tunnel branches for efficient food search and resource transportation. BioSystems 90: 802– 807. Google Scholar

12.

S-H Lee , R-L Yang , N-Y. Su 2008. Tunneling response of termites to a pre—formed tunnel. Behavioural Processes 79: 192–194. Google Scholar

13.

H Puche , N-Y. Su 2001. Application of fractal analysis for tunnel systems of subterranean termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) under laboratory conditions. Environmental Entomology 30: 545–549. Google Scholar

14.

GH. Pyke 1978. Optimal foraging in hummingbirds: testing the marginal value theorem. American Zoologist 18: 739–752. Google Scholar

15.

N-Y Su , RH. Scheffrahn 1986. A method to access, trap, and monitor field populations of the Formosan subterranean termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in the urban environment. Sociobiology 12: 299–304. Google Scholar

16.

M Tamashiro , JK Fujii , P-Y. Lai 1973. A simple method to observe, trap, prepare large numbers of subterranean termites for laboratory and field experiments. Environmental Entomology 2: 721–722. Google Scholar

17.

H Torres-Contreras , RA. Vasquez 2004. A field experiment on the influence of load transportation and patch distance on the locomotion velocity of Dorymyrmex goetschi (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insectes Sociaux 51:265–270. Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
Sook Jung Ku, Su Nan-Yao, and Lee Sang-Hee "Measurement of Time Taken by the Formosan Termite, Coptotermes formosanus, to Pass Tunnel Intersections," Journal of Insect Science 12(23), 1-7, (9 February 2012). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.012.2301
Received: 17 March 2011; Accepted: 1 May 2011; Published: 9 February 2012
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top