Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 July 2012 A New Record and Description of a New Species of the Genus Thrips, with an Updated Key to Species from Iran
Majid Mirab-balou, Xiao-li Tong, Xue-xin Chen
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

An illustrated key is provided to distinguish the 26 species of the genus Thrips L. (Thripidae: Thripinae) recorded from Iran. Thrips alavii Mirab-balou, Tong & Chen, sp. n. is described and illustrated. Thrips alliorum (Priesner) is newly recorded for the fauna of Iran. A checklist is provided for all recorded species in this genus from Iran, with information on the geographical distribution for each species.

Introduction

Thrips L. (Thripidae: Thripinae) is the largest genus in the Thysanoptera subfamily Thripinae, with about 280 described species in the world. Most species of Thrips are flower-living, although a few appear to breed mainly on leaves (Mound and Ng 2009), and several species play an important role in the pollination of crops. For example, T. hawaiiensis (Morgan) is an effective pollinator for oil and banana palms in the pacific region, and T. imagines Bagnall and T. obscuratus (Crawford) in Australia and New Zealand (Kirk 1984). Several species of Thrips are considered crop pests in various parts of the world, such as T. angusticeps Uzel, T. flavus Schrank, T. hawaiiensis (Morgan), T. meridionalis Priesner, and T. tabaci Lindeman (Moritz et al. 2001). The latter species is well known as the most important pest of onion crops, greenhouses and ornamental plants in Iran (Khanjani & Mirab-balou 2005 a,b; Mirab-balou et al. 2008, 2009, 2012), and it is a carrier of some Tospovirus diseases on ornamental plants, especially in Tehran and Markazi provinces (Ghotbi et al. 2003). Recently, transmission of an isolate of Tomato spotted wilt virus on cineraria (Senecio sp.) by T. tabaci has been confirmed in Fars province, Iran (Rasoulpour and Izadpanah 2003).

Because species belonging to the genus Thrips occur worldwide, taxonomic keys for the genus have been provided for many parts of the world, i.e., California (Bailey 1957); Illinois (Stannard 1968); Korea (Woo 1974); the European part of the USSR (Dyadechko 1977); India (Bhatti 1980); Asia and Australasia (Palmer 1992); North America (Nakahara 1994; Hoddle et al. 2009); Europe and the Mediterranean (zur Strassen 2003); Pakistan (Akram et al. 2003); Australia, New Caledonia and New Zealand (Mound & Masumoto 2005); Peninsular Malaysia (Mound & Azidah 2009); Afro-tropical Region (Mound 2010); and China, including Taiwan (Han 1997; Wang 2002; Zhang et al. 2011).

Currently, 26 species of the genus Thrips have been recorded in Iran (Bhatti et al. 2009). A key to 72 species of Thrips is available in zur Strassen's book (2003), and is useful for the study of Iranian thrips. The objective of our present paper is to provide an illustrated identification key to all 26 species known from Iran, including one new species, and one new record for the fauna of this country. In addition, some important characteristics shared by Iranian species of Thrips are listed in Table 1; a checklist is provided for all recorded species in this genus from Iran, with information on geographical distribution for each species (Table 2). Deciding the true host plant of Thysanoptera species is difficult, because plants on which adults are found are not always the same as those on which larvae can develop. Nevertheless, thrips-associated plants in Iran are listed in Table 3.

Materials and Methods

Thrips specimens were collected from different sites in Iran during 2007–2011. The method for preparing and mounting thrips on slides follows Mirab-balou & Chen (2010). All descriptions, measurements, and photos were made with a Leica DM IRB microscope, with a Leica Image 1000 system. All specimens were deposited in the Institute of Insect Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China (ZJUH). All measurements are given in micrometers, unless otherwise stated.

Specimens were also studied from the following collections: Insect Collection, Department of Entomology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province; and Entomological Museum, Northwest A. & F. University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province.

Genus Thrips L.

All members of the genus Thrips lack ocellar setae pair I on the head, and they all have paired ctenidia on abdominal tergite VIII, posteromesad to the spiracles. Other characteristics, such as number of antennal segments and setae on the forewing veins, and number of discal setae on the sternites, vary between species (Palmer 1992; Nakahara 1994; Mound and Masumoto 2005; Mirabbalou and Chen 2011). See Bhatti (1980) and Mound & Masumoto (2005) for generic characteristics, and the list of its synonyms.

Among Iranian species of the genus Thrips, T. tabaci (commonly known as onion thrips or tobacco thrips) is widely distributed. This polyphagous species is particularly abundant in warm, dry sites, especially where onion, its preferred host, is grown. It is a major pest of glasshouse crops, such as cucumber, sweet pepper, chrysanthemum, and many bedding plants in Iran (Pourian et al. 2009). Taxonomically, T. tabaci is principally characterized by rows of ciliate microtrichia on the sides of abdominal tergites II–VII, 4–7 distal setae on the first vein of the forewing, three lateral marginal setae on abdominal tergite II, and narrow transversely elongate pore plates on sternites III–V (males only). Another species, T. major Uzel, is characterized by having rows of ciliate microtrichia on the sides of abdominal tergites II–VII, similar to T. tabaci, but it can be distinguished from the latter by the following characters: tergite VIII with comb present laterally, forewing first vein with three distal setae, and tergite IX with two pairs of campaniform sensilla. Males of this species are very rare; we found less than ten males, but more than a thousand females.

Although T. iranicus and T. pistaciae have been recorded in Iran (Bhatti et al. 2009), little information on these two species is available. Dyadechko (1977) listed several characteristics for these two species as follows: (1) antennal segment V much shorter than IV in both species; (2) forewing first vein with 6–8 distal setae in T. pistaciae, and 3 distal setae in T. iranicus; (3) antennal segments I–III brownish yellow in T. pistaciae, but segments I and IV dark in T. iranicus; (4) abdominal tergite VIII without comb on posterior margin in T. pistaciae.

The females of T. trehernei were very similar to the females of T. physapus, the type-species of this genus, but T. trehernei had abdominal tergite X more than 80 microns long (less than 80 microns long in T. physapus), and the major setae on the body were longer than in T. physapus. The two species are most readily distinguished by the males, these being brown in T. trehernei, and yellow in T. physapus.

Key to Thrips species (females) in Iran

1. Abdominal sternites with at least one pair of discal setae (Figs. 42, 43, 44) 2

— Abdominal sternites without discal setae (Fig.45) 20

2. Pleurotergites III–VII with discal setae (Fig. 11, 13, 14) 3

— Pleurorergites III–VII without discal setae (Figs. 12, 15) 12

3. Forewing first vein with five or more distal setae (Fig. 32); abdominal tergite II with 3 or 4 lateral setae 4

— Forewing first vein with three or rarely four distal setae (Figs. 7, 16, 33–35); abdominal tergite II with 3 lateral setae (Fig. 11) 7

4. Pronotum with two pairs of long setae on anterior (same as Frankliniella) T. verbasci (Priesner)

— Pronotum without long setae on anterior (Figs. 8– 10) 5

5. Antennae 7-segmented; abdominal tergite II with four lateral setae T. minutissimus Linnaeus

— Antennae 8-segmented (Figs. 30–31, 49–52); abdominal tergite II with 3 lateral setae (Fig. 11) 6

6. Body dark; antennal segments generally dark; abdominal sternite VII with more than 13 discal setae that arranged on two rows (Fig. 43) T. atratus Haliday

— Body blackish brown; antennal segment III pale yellow in basal third; abdominal sternite VII with about 13 discal setae that arranged in 1–2 irregular rows (Fig. 44) T. fraudulentus Priesner

7. Body yellow or light brown with a darker abdomen; antennae 7- or 8-segmented 8

— Body dark brown to black; antennae 8– segmented 9

8. Antennae 7-segmented (Fig. 39); MCS absent; median metanotal setae situated far from anterior margin T. pillichi Priesner

— Antennae 8-segmented; MCS present; median metanotal setae situated at anterior margin T. trybomi (Karny)

9. Metanotal campaniform sensiall (MCS) present (Fig. 18) 10

— MCS absent (Figs. 17, 19–22) 11

10. Antennal segment III light yellow, or yellow; segment VII and VIII in equal length (Fig. 50); forewing dark (Figure 16) T. meridionalis Priesner

— Antennal segment III brown to light brown (Fig. 51); segment VII about 0.6–0.7 times as length as VIII; forewing pale or shaded T. vulgatissimus Haliday

11. Postocular setae pair II small and situated well behind row; median metanotal setae situated far behind anterior margin; abdominal tergite VIII posteromarginal comb may appear, absent or represented by a few microtrichia laterally and a very short lobed flange or craspedum medially (Fig. 27) T. attiorum (Priesner)

— Postocular setae pair II in line with I & III; median metanotal setae situated near anterior margin; abdominal tergite VIII with complete comb on posterior margin (Fig. 24) T. alavii Mirab-balou, Tong & Chen, sp. n.

12. Abdominal sternites II–VII or III–VII with discal setae 13

— Abdominal sternites III–VI, IV–VI or V–VI with discal setae 19

13. MCS present; abdominal tergite II with four lateral setae 14

— MCS absent; abdominal tergite II with three lateral setae 15

14. Forewings with base pale; metanotum with lines of sculpture longitudinal medially, but transverse at anterior; metanotal median setae situated on anterior margin; antennae 7-or 8-segmented (Fig. 52) T. hawaiiensis (Morgan)

— Forewings pale or dark but without base distinctly paler; metanotum with sculpture broadly striate; metanotal median setae situated just behind anterior margin; antennae 7-segmented T. coloratus Schmutz

15. Antennae 8segmented T. simplex (Morison)

— Antennae 7-segmented 16

16. Forewing first vein with 5–10 (rarely with 4) distal setae (Fig. 33) T. angusticeps Uzel

— Forewing first vein with 3 distal setae 17

17. Abdominal segment X more than 80 microns long; body with long major setae T. trehernei Priesner

— Abdominal segment X less than 80 microns long; body with major setae relatively short 18

18. Antennal segment III–V and half of VI yellow; abdominal segment X usually 58–73 microns long, the sides slightly concave T. physapus Linnaeus

— Antennal segment III–V white; abdominal segment X usually 69–80 microns long, the sides straight T. pelikani Schliephake

19. Antennae 8-segmented (Fig. 49); abdominal tergite II with four lateral marginal setae T. vuilleti (Bagnall)

— Antennae 7-segmented; abdominal tergite II with three lateral marginal setae T. mareoticus (Priesner)

20. Abdominal tergite II with four lateral marginal setae (Fig. 23) 21

— Abdominal tergite II with three lateral marginal setae 22

21. Abdominal tergite VIII with complete posteromarginal comb T. flavus Schrank

— Abdominal tergite VIII with posteromarginal comb only laterally . T. fuscipennis Haliday

22. Abdominal tergite VIII with posteromarginal comb laterally (Fig. 25) T. major Uzel

— Abdominal tergite VIII with complete posteromarginal comb 23

23. Abdominal tergite IX with two pair of campaniform sensilla T. dubius Priesner

— Abdominal tergite IX with one pair of campaniform sensilla (Fig. 46) 24

24. Forewings first vein with 4–7 distal setae; abdominal pleurotergites with rows of ciliate microtrichia T. tabaci Lindeman

— Forewings first vein with at most three distal setae; abdominal pleurotergal sculpture different, without closely spaced rows of microtrichia 25

25. Macropterous or micropterous (Fig. 36); body yellow T. nigropilosus Uzel

— Macropterous; body dark brown T. euphorbiae Knechtel

Key to Thrips species (males) in Iran (excluding T. alavii and T. fraudulentus for which males are not known)

1. Abdominal sternites with at least one pair of discal setae (Figs. 53–54, 56) 2

— Abdominal sternites without discal setae (Figs. 55,57–58) 17

2. Abdominal sternites III–VII with pore plate (Fig. 58) 3

— Abdominal sternites III–VI or III–V with pore plate 15

3. Pronotum with two pairs of long setae on anterior margin (same as Frankliniella) T. verbasci (Priesner)

— Pronotum with short setae on anterior margin 4

4. Most pleurotergites with at least one discal setae 5

— All pleurotergites without discal setae 9

5. Micropterous (Figure 37); abdominal tergite VIII with comb of a few microtrichia laterally; setae S1 on tergite IX situated anterior to S2, between campaniform sensilla, subequal in length to S2 and slightly closer together than to S2 (cf. Fig 60) T. attiorum (Priesner)

— Macropterous; other above characters variable 6

6. Antennae 7-segmented; body yellow T. pillichi Priesner

— Antennae 8-segmented; body brown to dark 7

7. Forewing first vein with 5–11 distal setae T. atratus Haliday

— Forewing first vein with 3 or rarely 4 distal setae 8

8. Body brown to dark brown T. vulgatissimus Haliday

— Body yellow T. trybomi (Karny)

9. Forewing first vein with 4 or more distal setae 10

— Forewing first vein with 3 distal setae 12

10. Antennae 8 segmented T. simplex (Morison)

— Antennae 7-segmented 11

11. Abdominal tergite IX setae S1 as length as S2; tergite VIII with incomplete posteromarginal comb T. angusticeps Uzel

— Abdominal tergite IX setae S1 slightly longer than S2; posteromarginal comb absent on tergite VIII T. coloratus Schmutz

12. Abdominal tergite II with four lateral setae; MCS present; abdominal sternites with discal setae laterally and posterior to pore plate (Fig. 56) T. hawaiiensis (Morgan)

— Abdominal tergite II with three lateral setae; MCS absent; abdominal sternites with discal setae laterally to pore plate 13

13. Body yellow T. physapus Linnaeus

- Body brown to dark brown 14

14. Median metanotal setae short (less than 35 microns); antennal segments IV & V pale yellow or white, VI largely yellow, only apical ⅕th light brown T. pelikani Schliephake

— Median metanotal setae long (about 50 microns); antennal segments IV & V yellow basally, distally brown, segment VI brown, except basal ⅓rd yellow T. trehernei Priesner

15. Abdominal sternites III–VI with pore plate; antennal segment I brown to dark brown, usually darker than II 16

— Abdominal sternites III–V (or IV) with pore plate; antennal segment I yellow or pale brown, usually as pale as II T. minutissimus Linnaeus

16. Antennae 8-segmented; MCS present T. meridionalis (Priesner)

— Antennae 7-segmented; MCS absent T. mareoticus (Priesner)

17. Abdominal sternites III–VII with pore plate (Fig. 58) 18

— Abdominal sternites III–V with pore plate (Fig. 57) T. tabaci Lindeman

18. Micropterous or brachypterous; pore plate sometimes very strongly, transversely elongated; MCS absent; abdominal tergite VIII with complete and long comb T. nigropilosus Uzel

— Macropterous; other above characters variable 19

19. MCS present T. fuscipennis Haliday

— MCS absent 20

20. Body brown; antennal segment I brown to dark brown 21

— Body yellow, or pale brown; antennal segment I white 22

21. Antennal segment V comparatively slender, 2.0–2.1 times the length as its width; pronotum and abdominal tergite IX with brown to dark brown setae (Fig. 59) T. dubius Priesner

— Antennal segment V comparatively stout, 1.5–1.7 times the length as its width; pronotum and abdominal tergite IX with pale setae T. euphorbiae Knechtel

22. Abdominal tergite II with three lateral setae T. major Uzel

- Abdominal tergite II with four lateral setae 23

23. Antennae 8-segmented; forewing first vein with four distal setae; body brown to dark brown T. vuilleti Bagnall

— Antennae 7-segmented; forewing first vein with three distal setae; body yellow T. flavus Schrank

Note. Known Iranian male Thrips species have pore plates on abdominal sternites as follows: on sternites III-V (or IV): T. minutissimus; on sternites III-V: T. tabaci; on sternites III–VI: T. mareoticus and T. meridionalis; and the remaining species with pore plates on sternites III–VII]

Thrips alavii Mirab-balou, Tong & Chen, sp. n.
(Figures 1, 7, 8, 13, 24, 30, 42)

  • Material studied. Holotype female (in ZJUH), Iran: Eberu (N 48° 55′, E 34° 71′, 2345 m. ASL), Hamedan Province, from Euphorbia sp., 8.vi.2009, Coll. M. Mirabbalou.

  • Description

    Female macropterous. Body length ∼1.5 mm. Body dark brown; antennal segment III, apex of II, distal of IV and V yellowish brown, the rest uniformly brown to dark brown (Figure 30); tarsi pale brown; fore femora yellowish brown, except laterally; body setae dark brown; forewings and clavus pale (Figure 7).

  • Measurements (Slide-mounted specimens). Distended body length 1500. Head: length 170, width 120; ocellar setae III 38, II 20. Compound eyes: dorsal length 53, dorsal width 40; distance between compound eyes 53. Pronotum: median length 190, median width 125; posteroangular setae I–II 55. Forewings: length 740, hind wing 640. Abdominal tergite IX: median length 70; tergite X median length 60. Ovipositor 210. Antennal segments I to VIII had a length (width) as follows: 17 (18), 26 (16), 35 (14), 30 (11), 25 (11), 38 (11), 6 (5), and 9 (4).

  • Head. The head was 1.5 times as wide as it was long (Figure 1). The cheeks were convex, with two pairs of ocellar setae; pair III was situated outside of the ocellar triangle, and without sculpture between ocelli. Ocellar setae pair III was situated outside of ocellar triangle, behind the front ocellus. Postocular setae I & III were a little longer than others (Figure 1). The antennal was 8-segmented, with forked sense cones on antennal segments III & IV (Figure 30). Segment VI was longer than others. Antennal segments I to VIII had a length/width as follows: 0.94, 1.65, 2.66, 2.62, 2.25, 3.6, 1.5 and 2.

  • Thorax. The pronotum was 1.6 times as wide as it was long, (Figure 8); two pairs of long posteroangular setae were present; posterior margin with three pairs of setae; at least 30– 33 discal setae were present. Mesonotum with median setae far from the posterior margin; metanotum longitudinally striate (but a little more broadly striate than T. vulgatissimus), MCS was absent; median pair of setae were situated at the anterior margin. Mesofurca with spinula. Forewings first vein with three setae on the distal half, second vein with complete row of setae (Figure 7).

  • Abdomen. Abdominal tergites II–VIII without sculpture medially, and the median setae were small and wide apart; tergite II with 3 lateral marginal setae; tergites V–VIII with paired ctenidia laterally, on VIII posteromesad to spiracle; the comb on the posterior margin of tergite VIII was complete and long (Figure 24); pleurotergites with discal setae (Figure 13); tergite IX with two pairs of campaniform sensilla; tergite X with median slit at apex; sternites II–VII with discal setae arranged in one row (Figure 42), II with one, and III–VII with 9–11 discal setae; sternite II with two pairs of posteromarginal setae, III–VII with 3 pais; setae S1 on sternite VII arising just in front of margin. The ovipositor was well developed.

  • Male. Unknown.

  • Remarks. This new species is similar to T. vulgatissimus, but it is readily distinguished from the latter by the following characters: MCS absent (vs. present in T. vulgatissimus); metanotal median setae situated at anterior margine (vs. far behind anterior margin in T. vulgatissimus); abdominal sternites II–VII with discal setae that arranged in single row (vs. arranged in irregular double row in T. vulgatissimus). It is also distinguished from T. alliorum by the following character states: metanotal median setae situated near anterior margin (vs. behind anterior margin in T. alliorum); abdominal tergite VIII with complete comb on posterior margin (vs. may appear absent or represented by a few microtrichia laterally in T. alliorum); head broader than length, and postocular setae arranged in one row (vs. head elongate, and median postocular setae situated far behind rest of row in T. alliorum).

  • Etymology. This species is named in honor of Eng. Jalil Alavi of the Agricultural & Natural Resources Research Center of Khorasan-e-Shomali province, Bojnourd-Iran.

  • Hosts. Euphorbia sp. (family Euphorbiaceae).

  • Distribution. Iran: Hamedan Province.

  • Thrips alliorum (Priesner) (New record)

  • Taeniothrips alliorum Priesner 1935: 128– 129.

    Taeniothrips carteri Moulton 1937: 183–184.

    Thrips alliorum (Priesner): Bhatti 1978: 195; Palmer 1992: 39–40; Han 1997: 287–289.

    This species was identified based on the descriptions by Palmer (1992), Nakahara (1994), and Han (1997), and is recorded here for the first time in Iran. This species is easily distinguished from other Iranian species by having an elongate head and median postocular setae situated far behind rest of row (Figure 2).

  • Material examined. 1,♀, Iran: Heydareh (N 48° 46′, E 34° 80′, 1968 m. ASL), Hamedan Province, from leek, 16.viii.2010, Coll. M. Mirab-balou; 1 ♀, Heydareh, Hamedan Province, from garlic, 27.vii.2010, Coll. M. Mirab-balou; deposited in the ZJUH.

  • Distribution. Iran: Hamedan Province; China, Korea, Japan, Manchuria, Hawaii (Palmer 1992; Mirab-balou et al. 2011).

  • Table 1.

    Some important characteristics of Iranian Thrips species. a) Discal setae on abdominal sternites: absent 0; present on sternites III–VII I ; present on sternites III–VI 2. b) Discal setae on pleurotergites: absent 0; present 1. c) Distal setae on forewing first vein, d) Number of setae on lateral tergite II. e) MCS: absent 0; present 1. f) Median metanotal setae: situated behind anterior margin 0; situated anterior at margin 1. g) Number of antennal segments, h) Abdominal tergite VIII posteromarginal comb: absent 0; present 1 ; only laterally 2. i) Position of Ocellar setae III/ocellar triangle: outside 0; inside 1.

    t01_01.gif

    Table 2.

    Distribution of Thrips species recorded from Iran.

    t02_01.gif

    Table 3.

    Plants in Iran associated with the genus Thrips (based on present study and data taken from Iranian literature).

    t03a_01.gif

    continued

    t03b_01.gif

    Figures 1–7.

    Thrips species. 1–6: Head: (1)T. alavii sp. n., (2) T. alliorum, (3) T. flavus, (4) T. meridionalis, (5) T. physapus, (6) T. pillichi; (7) T. alavii sp. n., forewing. (Scale bar = 30 microns). High quality figures are available online.

    f01_01.jpg

    Figures 8–16.

    Thrips species. 8–9: Pronotum: (8) T. alavii sp. n., (9) T. alliorum, (10) tabaci; 11–15: Abdominal tergite and pleurotergite: (11) T. alliorum, II, (12) T. tabaci, V, (13) T. alavii sp. n., III, (14) T. meridionalis, V, (15) T. hawaiiensis, II; (16) T. meridionalis, forewing. (Scale bar = 30 microns). High quality figures are available online.

    f08_01.jpg

    Figures 17–23.

    Thrips species. 17–22: Metanotum and meso- and metanotum: (17) T. physapus, (18) T. meridionalis, (19) T. tabaci, (20) T. nigropilosus, (21) T. trehernei, (22) T. flavus; (23) T. flavus, tergite II. (Scale bar = 30 microns). High quality figures are available online.

    f17_01.jpg

    Figures 24–31.

    Thrips species. 24–27: Abdominal tergite VIII: (24) T. alavii sp. n., (25) T. major, (26) T. angusticeps, (27) T. alliorum; 28– 31 : Antennae: (28) T. major, (29) T. physapus, (30) T. alavii sp. n., (31) T. alliorum. (Scale bar = 30 microns). High quality figures are available online.

    f24_01.jpg

    Figures 32–41.

    Thrips species. 24–27: Abdominal tergite VIII: (24) T. alavii sp. n., (25) T. major, (26) T. angusticeps, (27) T. alliorum; 28– 31 : Antennae: (28) T. major, (29) T. physapus, (30) T. alavii sp. n., (31) T. alliorum. (Scale bar = 30 microns). High quality figures are available online.

    f32_01.jpg

    Figures 42–52.

    Thrips species. 42–45: Abdominal sternite: (42) T. alavii sp. n., VII, (43) T. atratus, VII, (44) T. fraudulentis, VII, (45) T. tabaci, Vl; 46–47: Abdominal tergite IX: (46) T. tabaci, (47) T. trehernei; (48) T. physapus, abdominal tergite IX, male; 49–52: Antennae: (49) T. vuilleti, (50) T. meridionalis, (51) T. vulgatissimus, (52) T. hawaiiensis. (Scale bar = 30 microns). High quality figures are available online.

    f42_01.jpg

    Figures 53–60.

    Thrips species. 53–58: Pore plate on abdominal sternite: (53) T. meridionalis, VI, (54) T. atratus, VII, (55) T. dubius, VII, (56) T. hawaiiensis, VI, (57) T. tabaci, IV–V, (58) T. major, III–VII; 59– 60: Abdominal tergite IX, male: (59) T. dubius, (60) T. meridionalis. (Scale bar = 30 microns). High quality figures are available online.

    f53_01.jpg

    Acknowledgements

    We are grateful to Professor J. S Bhatti of New Delhi, India; Dr. Richard zur Strassen of Senckenberg Museum, Frankfurt-Germany; and Dr. Laurence A. Mound of CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, Canberra, Australia for their supplying of some useful references. We are also grateful to anonymous reviewers for useful comments, and to Professor Ji-nian Feng for supplying some materials deposited at the Thrips & Coccid Systematic Research Laboratory, Northwest A. & F. University, Yangling, Shaanxi-China.

    References

    1.

    W Akram , JB Koh , JJ Lee . 2003. Genus Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) from Pakistan with most commonly recorded species. Korean Journal of Entomology 33(4): 277–286. Google Scholar

    2.

    SF Bailey . 1957. The thrips of California Part I: Suborder Terebrantia. Bulletin of California Insect Survey 4: 143–220. Google Scholar

    3.

    JS Bhatti . 1978. Preliminary revision of Taeniothrips. Oriental Insects 12: 157–199. Google Scholar

    4.

    JS Bhatti . 1980. Species of the genus Thrips from India. Systematic Entomology 5: 109– 166. Google Scholar

    5.

    JS Bhatti , J Alavi , R zur Strassen , Z Telmadarraiy . 2009. Thysanoptera in Iran 1938–2007. An Overview. Part 1. Thrips 7: 1–82. Google Scholar

    6.

    NP Dyadechko . 1977. Thrips or fringe-winged insects (Thysanoptera) of the European part of the USSR. Urozhai Publishers. Google Scholar

    7.

    T Ghotbi , E Gilasian , N Shahraeen . 2003. Detection of tospoviruses in individual thrips by ELISA from ornamental plants in Tehran and Markazi provinces. Applied Entomology and Phytopathology 70: 33–34. Google Scholar

    8.

    YF Han . 1997. Economic insect fauna of China, FASC 55 (Thysanoptera). Science Press. Google Scholar

    9.

    MS Hoddle , LA Mound , D Paris . 2009. Thrips of California. Available online,  http://keys.lucidcentral.org/keys/v3/thrips_of_california/ThripsofCalifornia.htmlGoogle Scholar

    10.

    M Khanjani , M Mirab-balou . 2005. Study on phytophagous agents of garlic in Hamadan. Proceeding of the Medical Plant Congress, Mashhad, Iran 243–244. Google Scholar

    11.

    M Khanjani , M Mirab-balou . 2005b. Study on phytophagous agents of Bu-Ali Sina medical garden. Proceeding of the Medical Plant Congress, Mashhad, Iran 245–246. Google Scholar

    12.

    WDJ Kirk . 1984. Ecological studies on Thrips imagines Bagnall (Thysanoptera) in flowers of Echium plantagineum L. in Australia. Australian Journal of Entomology 9: 9–18. Google Scholar

    13.

    M Mirab-balou , XX Chen . 2010. A new method for preparing and mounting thrips for microscopic examination. Journal of Environmental Entomology 32(1): 115–121. Google Scholar

    14.

    M Mirab-balou , XX Chen . 2011. Iranian Thripinae with ctenidia laterally on the abdominal tergites (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Natura Montenegrina 10(4): 435–466. Google Scholar

    15.

    M Mirab-balou , HR Pourian , M Alizadeh . 2009. Ornamental (Pests & Diseases). Marze Danesh Press. Google Scholar

    16.

    M Mirab-balou , HR Pourian , O Golabtunchi , P Heidari . 2012. Fruit Pests (Third Edition). Marze Danesh Press. Google Scholar

    17.

    Mirab-balou, HR Pourian , Sh Pishevar. 2008. Entomology and pest management. Marze Danesh Press. Google Scholar

    18.

    M Mirab-balou , XL Tong , JN Feng , XX Chen . 2011. Thrips (Insecta: Thysanoptera) of China. Check List (Journal of Species Lists and Distribution) 7(6): 720–744. Google Scholar

    19.

    G Moritz , DC Morris , LA Mound . 2001. Thrips ID. Pest thrips of the world. An interactive identification and information system. CD-ROM published by ACIAR. Google Scholar

    20.

    D Moulton . 1937. Thysanoptera of the Hawaiian Islands. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society 9: 181–187. Google Scholar

    21.

    LA Mound . 2010. Species of the Genus Thrips (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) from the Afro-tropical Region. Zootaxa 2423: 1–24. Google Scholar

    22.

    LA Mound , AA Azidah . 2009. Species of the genus Thrips (Thysanoptera) from Peninsular Malaysia, with a checklist of recorded Thripidae. Zootaxa 2023: 55–68. Google Scholar

    23.

    LA Mound , M Masumoto . 2005. The genus Thrips (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) in Australia, New Caledonia and New Zealand. Zootaxa 1020: 1–64. Google Scholar

    24.

    LA Mound , YF Ng . 2009. An illustrated key to the genera of Thripinae (Thysanoptera) from South East Asia. Zootaxa 2265: 27–47. Google Scholar

    25.

    S Nakahara . 1994. The genus Thrips Linnaeus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) of the New World. United States Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 1822: 1–183. Google Scholar

    26.

    JM Palmer . 1992. Thrips (Thysanoptera) from Pakistan to the Pacific: a review. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) (Entomology) 61(1): 1–76. Google Scholar

    27.

    HR Pourian , M Mirab-balou , M Alizadeh , SZ Orosz . 2009. Study on biology of onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lind. (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on cucumber (var. Soltan) in laboratory conditions. Journal of Plant Protection Research 49(4): 390–394. Google Scholar

    28.

    H Priesner . 1935. New exotische Thysanopteren. Stylops 4: 125–131. Google Scholar

    29.

    H Priesner . 1954. On some Thysanoptera from Persia. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (12)7: 49–57. Google Scholar

    30.

    R Rasoulpour , K Izadpanah . 2003. Transmission of cineraria isolate of tomato spotted wilt virus by onion thrips in Shiraz. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology 39: 28. Google Scholar

    31.

    LJ Stannard . 1968. The Thrips, or Thysanoptera, of Illinois. Bulletin of the Illinois Natural History Survey 29: 213–552. Google Scholar

    32.

    CL Wang . 2002. Thrips of Taiwan: Biology and Taxonomy. Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute. Google Scholar

    33.

    KS Woo . 1974. Thysanoptera of Korea. Korean Journal of Entomology 4(2): 1–90. Google Scholar

    34.

    HR Zhang , YH Xie , ZY Li . 2011. Identification key to species of Thrips genus from China (Thysanoptera, Thripidae), with seven new records. Zootaxa 2810: 37–46. Google Scholar

    35.

    R zur Strassen . 2003. Die terebranten Thysanopteren Europas und des Mittelmeer-Gebietes. Die Tierwelt Deutschlands 74: 1–271 Google Scholar
    This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
    Majid Mirab-balou, Xiao-li Tong, and Xue-xin Chen "A New Record and Description of a New Species of the Genus Thrips, with an Updated Key to Species from Iran," Journal of Insect Science 12(90), 1-15, (1 July 2012). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.012.9001
    Received: 20 June 2011; Accepted: 1 May 2012; Published: 1 July 2012
    KEYWORDS
    checklist
    identification
    Back to Top