Translator Disclaimer
1 November 2004 Male accessory gland size and the evolutionary transition from single to multiple mating in the fungus-gardening ants
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Polyandry in hymenopteran social insects is surprisingly rare, despite its likely colony-level fitness benefits. Ordinarily, a male's fitness will be at odds with that of a colony when the genetic representation within it is diluted by multiple mating by the queen. Consequently, males are expected to be under selection to limit female re-mating, for example via secretions of their accessory glands. I hypothesized that if accessory glands in some way regulate female mating frequency, an evolutionary transition from single to multiple mating would likely be accompanied with a change in the morphology of the accessory glands. The accessory gland morphology was examined in the fungus-gardening ants, which have made a single transition from single to multiple mating. The evolution of polyandry within this clade corresponds to the loss of male accessory glands, lending tentative support to the idea that they may be involved in regulating mating frequency.

MAG

Male accessory gland

Introduction

Polyandry, multiple mating by females, occurs frequently in animals. By mating with several males, females gain benefits such as reduced harassment (Wilcox 1984), nuptial gifts (Zeh and Smith 1985), fertilization insurance (Ridley 1983), or genetic variety among offspring (Keller and Reeve 1994). However, it is generally believed that the proportion of eggs fertilized due to polyandry, is not in the in the interests of a male. Indeed, males have evolved numerous tactics preventing females from re-mating, from mate guarding (Birkhead and Parker 1997), to mating plugs (Devine 1977).

Hymenopteran social insects (ants, bees and wasps) are a notable exception to the general prevalence of polyandry, with most females mating just once and using sperm from that copulation for the rest of their lives. To date polyandry has been documented in only about a half-dozen genera of ants, bees and wasps (Boomsma and Sundström 1998, Strassmann 2001). Although their mates do not provide nuptial gifts or parental care, as they die shortly after mating, social insect females are nonetheless expected to benefit from polyandry. In particular, females may either acquire a potentially advantageous mixture of genes for their offspring (Page and Metcalff 1982; Crozier and Page 1985; Sherman et al. 1988; Keller and Reeve 1994), obtain a quantity of sperm necessary for long term production of workers and large colony sizes (Cole 1983) or reduce kin conflict with daughters over sex ratios and male parentage (Starr 1984; Moritz 1985). Indeed, genetic advantages of polyandry have been demonstrated both in naturally polyandrous harvester ants (Cole and Wiernasz 1999) and, by artificial insemination, in singly mating bumblebees (Baer and Schmid-Hempel 1999).

Mating frequency in social insects determines the relatedness of workers and thus the genetic structure of the colony, which affects numerous aspects of behavior. For example, changes in relatedness brought upon by polyandry may be involved in resolving conflicts over male parentage and offspring sex ratios (Ratnieks 1988; Boomsma and Grafen 1990). Accordingly, knowledge of the forces underlying the evolution of multiple mating by queens is fundamental to our understanding of social evolution.

The interests of males have been largely ignored when considering social insect polyandry, probably because of the secondary roles males appear to play in these societies, but see Hölldobler and Bartz (1985) and Boomsma and Sundström (2000), for alternative perspectives. However, secretions of male accessory glands (MAGs), which attenuate re-mating by females, have been documented in numerous non-social insects (Chen 1984). More recently mating plugs were discovered in a bumblebee species (Sauter et al. 2001). These plugs, which consist principally of a mixture of four fatty acids, were found to inhibit re-mating by females (Baer et al. 2001). Male fire ants transfer at least two of the same four fatty acids to females during mating (Mikheyev, 2003) suggesting that re-mating suppression of polyandry may occur in many hymenopteran social insects (Sauter et al. 2001), and may involve the same chemical mechanism as the bumblebees.

The fungus gardening ants have been the focus of several phylogenetic (Schultz and Meier 1995, Wetterer et al. 1998) and paternity studies (Kerr 1961, Moser 1967, Corso and Serzedello 1981, Villesen et al. 1999, Murakami et al. 2000). While the basal species are singly mating, leaf cutters in the genera Atta and Acromyrmex, made a single transition to polyandry (Villesen et al. 2002). Thus, these ants provide a means of examining the possible association between MAGs and the evolution of polyandry. Specifically, if MAG secretions in some way affect female mating frequency, then the evolutionary transition from monandry to polyandry would likely be correlated with morphological changes in the glands themselves.

Materials and Methods

Males from seven attine genera (seventeen species) were dissected under magnification, their internal reproductive systems were photographed and the volumes of their male accessory glands (MAGs) and seminal vesicles measured by approximating them as either cylinders or spheroids. In addition, a photograph of the male reproductive system (Hung and Vinson 1975) of the polyandrous (Moser 1967) At. texana was included in the analysis. See Table 1 for a complete list of species.

Males of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta, a known singly mated species (Ross and Fletcher 1985) with a well-studied reproductive system (Ball and Vinson 1984), were dissected and included as an outgroup. S. invicta, which belongs in the same subfamily as the attines (Myrmicinae), illustrates the internal reproductive morphology common to most ants studied previously (Beck 1972; Hung and Vinson 1975; Wheeler and Krutzsch 1992), which appears to be the primitive condition in ants.

The seminal vesicles and MAGs of the multiply mating genera Acromyrmex and Atta, and a few singly mates species, were stained and sectioned. All the specimens were stored in 70% ethanol. The MAGs and seminal vesicles were dissected out, fixed for 16–24 h with either Bouins solution or Z-5, then dehydrated with a succession of 95% ethanol (15 min), 100% ethanol (15 min), methyl salicylate (30 min) and two changes of xylene. The tissues were then infiltrated with two changes of Paraplast Plus (Fisher Scientific,  www.fishersci.com/) mixed with a few drops of honeybee wax (1 hour each infiltration). Tissues were sectioned at 10 µm, mounted on slides and dried overnight. After being deparaffinized and hydrated with distilled water, the slides were stained with hematoxylin (30 sec) and eosin-Y (15 sec). The estimates of MAG volumes for Acromyrmex and Atta species were made from stained sections mounted on slides. In this manner sperm could be clearly visible in the seminal vesicles, while MAG contents stained a solid red.

Statistical analysis

Male ants are highly specialized for locating and mating with females. A male's gaster contains the bare minimum of life support organs with the rest being occupied by the reproductive structures; MAGs and the seminal vesicles. As there appeared to be a trade-off between allocating space to MAGs versus seminal vesicles, the relative changes in their morphology were expressed as a ratio of MAG volume over seminal vesicle volume.

To eliminate any potential problems caused by phylogenetic non-independence due to unequal genetic distance between species, phylogenetic information derived from (Wetterer et al. 1998) and T. R. Schultz, (pers. comm. 2002) was incorporated to compute a set of phylogenetically independent contrasts (Felsenstein 1985) using the CONTRAST module of PHYLIP (version 3.5).

Results

The loss or extreme reduction of MAGs exactly corresponds with the appearance of polyandry in the fungus gardening ants. While the MAGs of the basal attines and fire ants are prominent, with conspicuous lobes protruding laterally off the ejaculatory duct, Atta possess minute accessory glands, relative to the size off their seminal vesicles, and Acromyrmex appear to lack MAGs entirely. Figure 1 shows the presence or absence of large MAGs mapped onto the attine phylogeny (Schultz and Meier 1995, Wetterer et al. 1998), as well as characteristic MAG morphologies. The reproductive system of attine males, excluding the leaf cutter clade, is remarkably similar to that of fire ants and to that of most ants studied to date in that they all possess slender seminal vesicles and prominent lobed MAGs. In the singly mating species, MAGs were about equal in volume to the seminal vesicles. However, a major transition in internal morphology occurs in the leaf cutting genera with the extreme reduction of MAGs in Atta and their complete disappearance in Acromyrmex. Figure 2 illustrates the inverse relationship between the volumes of MAGs relative to seminal vesicle volume and a species' effective paternity, which is a measure of the genetic diversity within a colony due to multiple matings. The effective mating frequency controls for unequal sperm usage by weighing the relative contribution to fertilizations of the different mates of the queen. The phylogenetically independent contrasts of relative MAG volume and effective paternity were negatively correlated (r=−0.77, N=6) for all the species listed in Figure 2, except Ac. echinatior and At. colombica, which lacked phylogenetic distance information and were not included in the analysis.

Discussion

The change in MAG volume, which decreases in multiply mating species, suggests that these glands may be involved in regulating multiple mating by females. Ideally, behavioral assays using instrumentally inseminated females should be used to test the function of MAGs, as has been done in bumblebees (Baer et al. 2001). However, to the best of my knowledge, no attine ant has ever been instrumentally inseminated or mated in a laboratory setting. Thus, for now, morphological correlations, somewhat corroborated by evidence for fatty acid transfer from fire ant MAGs (Mikheyev, 2003), provide the best, though inconclusive evidence that MAGs regulate multiple mating in attine ants.

However, as is the case for all correlative evidence, these observations are consistent with a number of other alternative hypotheses. For instance, MAGs could be the source of nuptial gifts, which are no longer offered by males of Acromyrmex and Atta due to some unknown change in the direction of sexual selection accompanying polyandry. Though Sauter et al. (2001) argued that the bumblebees' mating plug is too small to provide measurable nutritional support and the fire ants secretion also appears miniscule (Mikheyev, 2003), there are no data on size or composition of MAG secretions in the attine ants and this hypothesis cannot be excluded. Likewise, MAG secretions may be used for intersexual signaling that happens differently in singly and multiply mated species. Additionally, the evolution polyandry and subsequent sperm competition may have reduced the adaptive value of large MAGs relative to the need for large seminal vesicles. Doubtless, more hypotheses could be offered.

Assuming that MAG secretions do enforce monandry, we can speculate about forces causing the evolution of polyandry. For instance, polyandry may have evolved when higher attine females, through an unknown mechanism, were able to overcome the male's manipulative strategy. If so, males would not be expected reduce MAG size, but to pursue a coevolutionary arms race, perhaps even leading to MAG hypertrophy. More likely, the evolution of polyandry in the fungus gardeners was driven not solely by female preference for multiple mating but by selection on the males themselves. In theory, polyandry (i.e. increased genetic diversity) amplifies the fitness of a multiply mated colony, relative to a singly mated colony (Page and Metcalff 1982; Sherman et al. 1988). If a queen's multiple mating confers a colony-level fitness boost sufficient to overcompensate her mates for effects of genetic dilution due to polyandry, males will be selected to stop monopolizing females. The beneficial effects of polyandry in harvester ants described by Cole and Wiernasz (1999) appear sufficient to give the necessary fitness amplification, especially considering the high rates of mortality among the more genetically homogeneous colonies. Given the relative rarity of polyandry in the social insects, more needs to be known about the specific benefits of this behavior. Comparative studies may yield clues about why it evolved in only a few lineages.

The inhibition of female re-mating via MAG secretions may be a widespread phenomenon in insects (Chen 1984). The high relatedness within social insect colonies, which has been proposed for the evolution of eusociality through kin selection (Hamilton 1964), presupposes monandry. Thus, MAG-enforced single mating by females in some insect groups may be yet another factor facilitating the evolution of complex kin-based social systems.

Acknowledgments

I thank TR Schultz, JK Wetterer and A Wild for supplying attine males for this study from their collections. I am in debt to UG Mueller and his lab for arranging my accommodations during a collecting trip in Panama and sharing specimens from their collections. I am grateful to WR Tschinkel and his lab for their support throughout the project and assistance with laboratory equipment and supplies. DM Watson performed the sectioning of specimens and the histological stains. I thank R Rogers for allowing me to use the GC/MS at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory and CA Hughey for making sure the device was up and running when I needed it. Thanks to ES Adams, UG Mueller, D Houle, JN Seal, C Smith, S Soucy and WR Tschinkel for their comments on the manuscript. Funding for this project has been provided by an Explorer's Club grant and a Sigma Xi Grant-in-Aid of Research.

References

1.

B. Baer, E. D. Morgan, and P. Schmid-Hempel . 2001. A nonspecific fatty acid within the bumblebee mating plug prevents females from remating. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98:3926–3928. Google Scholar

2.

B. Baer and P. Schmid-Hempel . 1999. Experimental variation in polyandry affects parasite loads and fitness in a bumble-bee. Nature 397:151–154. Google Scholar

3.

D. E. Ball and S. B. Vinson . 1984. Anatomy and histology of the male reproductive system of the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology 13:283–294. Google Scholar

4.

V. H. Beck 1972. Vergleichende histologische Untersuchungen an Polyergus rufenscens und Raptiformica sanguinea. Insectes Sociaux 19:301–342. Google Scholar

5.

T. R. Birkhead and G. A. Parker . 1997. Sperm competition and mating systems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB, editors. Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. 121–145. Oxford: Blackwell Science. Google Scholar

6.

J. J. Boomsma and A. Grafen . 1990. Intraspecific variation in ant sex satios and the Trivers-Hare hypothesis. Evolution 44:1026–1034. Google Scholar

7.

J. J. Boomsma and L. Sundström . 1998. Patterns of paternity skew in Formica ants. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 42:85–92. Google Scholar

8.

J. J. Boomsma and L. Sundström . 2000. Reproductive alliances and posthumous fitness enhancement in male ants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 257:1439–1444. Google Scholar

9.

P. S. Chen 1984. The functional morphology and biochemistry of insect male accessory glands and their secretions. Annual Review of Entomology 29:233–255. Google Scholar

10.

B. J. Cole 1983. Multiple mating and the evolution of social behavior in the Hymenoptera. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 12:191–201. Google Scholar

11.

B. J. Cole and D. C. Wiernasz . 1999. The selective advantage of low relatedness. Science 285:891–893. Google Scholar

12.

C. R. Corso and A. Serzedello . 1981. A study of multiple mating habit in Atta laevigata based on DNA content. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 69:901–902. Google Scholar

13.

R. H. Crozier and R. E. Page . 1985. On being the right size: male contributions and multiple mating in social Hymenoptera. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 18:105–115. Google Scholar

14.

M. C. Devine 1977. Copulatory plugs, restricted mating opportunities and reproductive competition among male garter snakes. Nature 167:345–346. Google Scholar

15.

J. Felsenstein 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125:1–15. Google Scholar

16.

W. D. Hamilton 1964. The genetical evolution of social beahviour. II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:17–52. Google Scholar

17.

B. Hölldobler and S. H. Bartz . 1985. Sociobiology of reproduction in ants. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M, editors. Experimental Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 237–257. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates. Google Scholar

18.

A. C. F. Hung and S. B. Vinson . 1975. Notes on the male reproductive system in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of the New York Entomological Society 83:192–197. Google Scholar

19.

L. Keller and H. K. Reeve . 1994. Genetic-variability, queen number, and polyandry in social Hymenoptera. Evolution 48:694–704. Google Scholar

20.

W. E. Kerr 1961. Acasalamento de rainhas com vários machos em duas espécies da tribu Attini (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 21:45–48. Google Scholar

21.

A. S. Mikheyev 2003. Evidence for mating plugs in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Insectes Sociaux 50:401–402. Google Scholar

22.

R. F. A. Moritz 1985. The effects of multiple mating on the worker-queen conflict in Apis mellifera L. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 16:375–377. Google Scholar

23.

J. C. Moser 1967. Mating activities of Atta texana (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insectes Sociaux 14:295–312. Google Scholar

24.

T. Murakami, S. Higashi, and D. Windsor . 2000. Mating frequency, colony size, polyethism and sex ratio in fungus-growing ants (Attini). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 48:276–284. Google Scholar

25.

R. E. Page and R. A. Metcalff . 1982. Multiple mating, sperm utilization and social evolution. American Naturalist 119:263–281. Google Scholar

26.

F. L. W. Ratnieks 1988. Reproductive harmony via mutual policing in eusocial Hymenoptera. American Naturalist 132:217–236. Google Scholar

27.

M. Ridley 1983. Mating frequency and fecundity in insects. Biological Reviews 63:509–549. Google Scholar

28.

K. G. Ross and D. J. C. Fletcher . 1985. Comparative study of genetic and social structure in two forms of the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 17:349–356. Google Scholar

29.

A. Sauter, M. J. F. Brown, B. Baer, and P. Schmid-Hempel . 2001. Males of social insects can prevent queens from multiple mating. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 268:1449–1454. Google Scholar

30.

T. R. Schultz and R. Meier . 1995. A phylogenetic analysis of the fungus-growing ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Attini) based on morphological characters of the larvae. Systematic Entomology 20:337–370. Google Scholar

31.

P. W. Sherman, T. D. Seeley, and H. K. Reeve . 1988. Parasites, pathogens, and polyandry in social Hymenoptera. American Naturalist 131:602–610. Google Scholar

32.

C. K. Starr 1984. Sperm competition, kinship and sociality in the aculeate Hymenoptera. In: Smith RL, editor. Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems. 35–79. Academic Press, Orlando. Google Scholar

33.

J. Strassmann 2001. The rarity of multiple mating by females of social Hymenoptera. Insectes Sociaux 48:1–13. Google Scholar

34.

P. Villesen, P. J. F. Gertsch, J. Frydenberg, U. G. Mueller, and J. J. Boomsma . 1999. Evolutionary transition from single to multiple mating in fungus-growing ants. Molecular Ecology 8:1819–1824. Google Scholar

35.

P. Villesen, T. Murakami, T. R. Schultz, and J. J. Boomsma . 2002. Identifying the transition between single and multiple mating of queens in fungus-growing ants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 269:1541–1548. Google Scholar

36.

J. K. Wetterer, T. R. Schultz, and R. Meier . 1998. Phylogeny of fungus-growing ants (Tribe Attini) based on mtDNA sequence and morphology. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9:42–47. Google Scholar

37.

D. E. Wheeler and P. H. Krutzsch . 1992. Internal Reproductive system in adult males of the genus Camponotus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Formicinae). Journal of Morphology 211:307–317. Google Scholar

38.

R. S. Wilcox 1984. Male copulatory guarding enhances female foraging success in a water strider. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 15:171–174. Google Scholar

39.

D. W. Zeh and R. L. Smith . 1985. Paternal investment in terrestrial arthropods. American Zoologist 25:785–805. Google Scholar

Figure 1.

Trait mapping on the attine phylogeny. The transition indicated on the phylogeny corresponds to both the evolution of polyandry, as well as to the reduction of MAGs in the monophyletic leafcutter clade including Acromyrmex and Atta. Representative dissections of males, illustrating the primitive and derived morphologies, are shown alongside the phylogeny. An outgroup, the fire ants (Solenopsis) has been included for an informal comparison. AG = accessory glands, SV = seminal vesicles. Note that Ac. volcanus does not have accessory glands.

i1536-2442-4-37-1-f01.gif

Figure 2.

Relationship between relative MAG volume and the number of matings by queens of attine ants (Strassmann 2001, Villesen et al. 2002). The polyandrous species (Acromyrmex and Atta) have much smaller MAGs relative to their seminal vesicles than the monandrous genera (Apterostigma, Cyphomyrmex and Sericomyrmex).

i1536-2442-4-37-1-f02.gif

Table 1.

Species used for morphological and histological study. Numbers in parentheses indicate sample size.

i1536-2442-4-37-1-t01.gif
Alexander S. Mikheyev "Male accessory gland size and the evolutionary transition from single to multiple mating in the fungus-gardening ants," Journal of Insect Science 4(37), 1-5, (1 November 2004). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.004.3701
Received: 12 November 2003; Accepted: 1 August 2004; Published: 1 November 2004
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top