Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
8 November 2021 Development of Novel Management Tools for Phortica variegata (Diptera: Drosophilidae), Vector of the Oriental Eyeworm, Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida: Thelaziidae), in Europe
M. A. González, D. Bravo-Barriga, P. M. Alarcón-Elbal, J. M. Álvarez-Calero, C. Quero, M. Ferraguti, S. López
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Lachryphagous males of Phortica variegata (Fallén, 1823) are gaining increasing attention in Europe, as they act as vectors of the nematode Thelazia callipaeda Railliet & Henry, 1910, causal agent of thelaziosis, an emergent zoonotic disease. Currently, there are no effective control strategies against the vector, and surveillance and monitoring rely on time-consuming and nonselective sampling methods. Our aim was to improve the knowledge about the population dynamics and the chemical ecology of the species. A total of 5,726 P. variegata flies (96.4% males and 3.6% females, mostly gravid) were collected in field experiments during June–September of 2020 in an oak forest in northern Spain. Our results indicate that 1) by means of sweep netting a significantly higher number of captures were found both around the collector's body and in the air than at ground level; 2) a positive relationship was detected between the abundance of Phortica flies and temperature, with two significant peaks of abundance at 24 and 33°C; 3) the blend of red wine and cider vinegar was the most attractive bait; 4) yellow traps captured fewer flies compared to black and transparent traps; and 5) a significant reduction toward vinegar and wine was detected in presence of the phenolic monoterpenoid carvacrol. In addition, all the males (n = 690) analyzed by both molecular detection and dissection resulted negative for the presence of T. callipaeda larvae. Overall, these findings provide a better understanding of the vector in terms of monitoring and management strategies.

The number of emerging and reemerging infectious diseases affecting humans is currently increasing (Cupertino et al. 2020), and approximately 75% of these diseases are known to be of zoonotic origin (Vorou et al. 2007). Regardless of arboviruses, emerging parasitic infestations are gaining relevance. Although protozoa are more likely to be responsible for most of them, several metazoan infestations have raised the alarm in recent times as major public health concerns (Weiss 2008).

Accordingly, the oriental eyeworm, Thelazia callipaeda Railliet & Henry, 1910, causal agent of the vector-borne zoonotic disease thelaziosis that causes different ocular lesions with variable degree of severity (including conjunctivitis, keratitis, corneal opacity, ulcers, and even blindness), has gained great attention in Europe over the last decades (Do Vale et al. 2020, Otranto et al. 2021). After the detection of the first case of canine thelaziosis in Italy in the late 1980s (Rossi and Bertaglia 1989), as well as in foxes and cats (Otranto et al. 2003), the disease has spread throughout almost all mainland Europe, not only favored by pet trade (Graham-Brown et al. 2017, Silva et al. 2020), but also by the emergence of autochthonous foci with high infection rates (Marino et al. 2020). In addition to Europe, a recent case report of autochthonous canine thelaziosis in the United States has arisen great concern among medical and veterinary communities, and evidences the spread of the parasite overseas (Schwartz et al. 2021). Phylogenetic analyses of extirpated eyeworms revealed that they belong to the European haplotype-1 (Schwartz et al. 2021), which would imply a possible introduction of T. callipaeda from abroad, and in turn reinforces the fact that American populations of P. variegata are competent vectors for this nematode (Otranto et al. 2018). To date, T. callipaeda infections in Europe have been reported in wild animals (e.g., red fox, wolf, beech marten, and badger; Otranto et al. 2009, Ionică et al. 2018, Seixas et al. 2018), domestic carnivores (dogs and cats; Otranto et al. 2003, Dorchies et al. 2007, Maia et al. 2016), and lagomorphs (hares and rabbits; Otranto et al. 2009). On the other hand, the number of cases of T. callipeda infection in humans has increased during the last 10 yr in numerous European countries (Otranto et al. 2013), such as those reported in Italy and France (Otranto and Dutto 2008), Spain (Marino et al. 2020), and more recently in Croatia, Serbia, and Germany (Paradžik et al. 2016, Tasić-Otašević et al. 2016, Dolff et al. 2020).

In Spain, the first autochthonous case of thelaziosis was reported in 2010 in a dog from the Cáceres province (Miró et al. 2011). Shortly thereafter, the first human case of thelaziosis was reported in the same province (Fuentes et al. 2012). Recent findings indicate new areas of central Spain have to be considered as autochthonous for canine thelaziosis (Marino et al. 2018), which reaffirms its status as an emerging zoonotic disease that deserves public awareness and knowledge (Otranto and Dutto 2008).

In Europe, the fly species Phortica variegata (Fallén, 1823) has been proved to be involved in the transmission of the parasite both under experimental and natural conditions (Otranto et al. 2005, 2006b). Male adults of P. variegata act as the intermediate host of the parasite, and due to their tear-feeding behavior, the parasite spreads from one to another host. Males feed on lachrymal secretions of infested animals during summer, and while feeding, first-stage larvae are ingested. After developing to the third-stage inside the fly, they are transmitted when encountering a new suitable host (Otranto et al. 2005). In addition to parasite transmission, P. variegata activity also represents a serious nuisance to host, especially for humans, due to its hovering activity while seeking the eyes and body transpiration (Otranto et al. 2006a). The distribution range of this fly is related to reports of cases of thelaziosis in Europe (Do Vale et al. 2020), i.e., regions at 800–1,000 m.a.s.l. characterized by a continental Mediterranean climate, with deciduous forests (mainly Quercus spp.), and the presence of nearby rivers (Otranto et al. 2006a, Palfreyman et al. 2018). Based on an ecological niche modeling, the northern Spain is suggested as a suitable area for the development of this zoophilic fly species (Palfreyman et al. 2018). Despite some infection cases detected in dogs and cats (Marino et al. 2020), and the occurrence of naturally infested P. variegata males in central Spain (Marino et al. 2018), no information is available on the prevalence of T. callipaeda on P. variegata populations in northern Spain. Under this context, the zoonotic nature of T. callipaeda and its tight relationship with P. variegata strongly promote the need to develop effective vector-targeted control methods.

From an integrated pest management perspective, a bait-based mass trapping strategy could be considered as a feasible eco-friendly approach. So far, P. variegata surveillance and monitoring rely on two broadly different sampling methods that result in a skewed sex ratio. On the one hand, direct netting around the host eyes collects mainly males (Roggero et al. 2010, Marino et al. 2018), while the sex ratio from fruit-baited traps containing sliced pieces of fruits (e.g., apples, bananas, and pears), tends to be more balanced, with large fluctuations depending on the sampling season (Otranto et al. 2006a, Roggero et al. 2010). In addition, it is suggested that beer traps hung in the tree canopy may be attractive for females (Máca 1977). However, none of these methods should be considered as a feasible alternative for mass trapping, due to their inherent limitations, such as time loss and host dependency (net sweeping; Marino et al. 2018), and low specificity (fruit baits; Roggero et al. 2010). Consequently, the development of a more selective, effective, and user-friendly trapping system would represent a more useful tool for surveillance, monitoring, and even mass trapping of this pest species.

Our aim was to assess in field trials, the abundance of P. variegata flies with respect to different heights and climatic characteristics (temperature and wind); the attractiveness of different fermented baits compared to that exerted by fruit bait; the influence of different trap colors as a visual stimulus; the repellence exerted by different monoterpenoids; and the detection of T. callipaeda in feral males. Overall, these findings will represent a first step in shedding light on different factors that may interact mediating the attraction of P. variegata, contributing thus to a better understanding of potential management strategies for this vector species.

Material and Methods

Study Area and Insect Sampling, Processing, and Taxonomic Identification

Field trappings were conducted in a private recreational area (ca. 75 ha; 42.660420, –2.510518; altitude 745 m.a.s.l.) with high human attendance and serious nuisance repeatedly caused by P. variegata over the last summers. The sampling area was located within the Izki Natural Park (ca. 9,150 ha), a forested area at the eastern border of the province of Álava (Basque Country, northern Spain), characterized by cold, rainy winters and hot, dry summers. The average mean temperature, total precipitation, and relative humidity during the sampling period was 16.7°C (max mean 24.3°C, min mean 9.8°C), 171 l/m3, and 70.8%, respectively (data from a weather station located ca. 4.4 km from the sampling points, accessed through  www.euskalmet.com). The flora is dominated by the Pyrenean oak (Quercus pyrenaica; Fig. 1A), constituting one of the largest oak woodlands (ca. 3,500 ha) in Europe. Additionally, Quercus robur, Ilex aquifolium, Fagus sylvatica, and Prunus sp. are also relatively abundant in the area.

All the insects trapped were preserved in ethanol (70%) and stored at –20°C until further morphological identification under a stereomicroscope (4×; Digilab, model DI-224, Bethesda, MD; Fig. 1B). Phortica variegata individuals were segregated from by-catch according to diagnostic species-specific features (Máca 1977) and sorted by collection date. Subsequent gender determination was based on the morphology of the terminal part of the abdomen, i.e., when pressing the abdomen females extend the ovipositor, whereas males have a visible aedeagus. In addition, the body of females tends to be paler than in males (Fig. 1C; Otranto et al. 2006a). Gravid females were also noted by the presence of eggs in the abdomen (Fig. 1D).

Fig. 1.

Sampling site composed of Quercus pyrenaica, and inset of the color traps (from left to right: black, red, transparent, and yellow) used in Experiment C (top right; A). Specimens of Phortica variegata in ethanol (70%; B). Lateral view of male (left) and female (right) of P. variegata, respectively (C). Lateral view of the abdomen of a gravid female (D).

img-z3-1_328.jpg

Experiment A: Assessment of Different Net Sweeping Heights and Climatic Conditions on P. variegata Abundance

Sampling was conducted from 01-VI-20 to 01-VIII-20, by sweep netting with a standard entomological polyester net to assess the spatial distribution of the flies at three different heights: at ground level (on grass and shrubs), on human (around the face of the collector, ca. 175 cm), and at a height of 200–220 cm above the ground (below the tree canopy and open areas in the landscape). A total of 15 sampling transects were conducted over a 3-mo sampling period (5 per month) between 16:00 and 18:00 h, as preliminary observations revealed that P. variegata is active throughout these hours. The transect, consisting of shaded and sunny areas, was zig-zagged over a distance of 150 m with three stops of 10 s every 50 m by the same collector, to avoid any bias in sweep-net samples (Cooper et al. 2012). An average of 60 strokes per sampling height were performed per transect, one after the other, with a maximum of 5 min for emptying the contents between each sweeping substrate. Captured flies were aspirated with a mechanical aspirator (InsectaVac aspirator, BioQuip Products Inc., Compton, CA), and stored in ethanol (70%) until further identification. To correlate data collection with the influence of climatic factors, temperature (°C), and wind speed (m/s) were recorded daily at the beginning and at the end of sample collection using an anemometer (Proster TL0017, Hong Kong, China).

Experiments B–D: General Methodology

A total of three consecutive field trapping experiments (encoded hereafter as Experiments B, C, and D) were deployed from 01-VI-20 to 30-IX-20, when the flight activity of P. variegata peaks (Marino et al. 2018). Each experiment contained from three (3 × 3 Latin square design; Experiment B) to four traps (4 × 4 Latin square design; Experiments C and D), placed at least 15 m apart from one to each other. Traps operated for three consecutive days within an experiment, after which the trap was emptied and randomly rotated to a new position. Each experiment lasted 24 d, accounting hence for a total of 8 replicates. For trap selection, the methodology of Roggero et al. (2010) was adapted, using transparent plastic bottles (330 ml) drilled with 14 holes (4 mm diameter) randomly distributed along the medium height of the bottle. Bottle traps were vertically suspended of an oak tree at 1.60–1.80 m above the ground level. New bottles were used after each trap collection. Before any trial, empty bottles were tested for three consecutive days as blank controls, to check whether P. variegata entered the trap in absence of any bait. Details of each experiment are provided separately below.

Experiment B: Assessment of the Attraction of Different Baits on P. variegata

Three different baits were selected to be tested, according to their attractiveness on P. variegata (Otranto et al. 2006b, Palfreyman et al. 2018), and drosophilid species (Landolt et al. 2012, Iglesias et al. 2014). Each bait consisted of 1) a slurry mixture of rotten fruits (45 g of banana, apple, and pear) mixed with 5 ml of water, 2) an admixture (50 ml) of cider vinegar (75%) and red wine (25%), and 3) activated yeast in powder (10 mg) and sugar (10 g) diluted in water (30 ml). The mixture of rotten fruits was prepared in bulk, stored at –20°C, and left at room temperature for 12 h before being deployed in field. Each bait was renewed on each trap collection day.

Experiment C: Assessment of the Influence of Trap Color on P. variegata Catches

The efficiency of three different colored bottle traps (black, red, and yellow) was tested against that of the same transparent bottle previously used in Experiment B (Fig. 1A). For obtaining the colored bottles, transparent bottles were completely lined with an adhesive tape of the corresponding color. The mixture of red wine and cider vinegar (50 ml) was used as standard bait for each treatment, as it proved to be the most effective attractant in Experiment B.

Experiment D: Assessment of the Potential Repellency of Different Terpenoids on P. variegata

Trial and error assays showed that 10 ml of the blend of red wine and cider vinegar was the minimum optimal amount to attract flies to trap bottles. Thereby, three monoterpenoid compounds, namely 2-isopropyl-5-methylphenol (hereafter referred as thymol), 5-isopropyl-2-methylphenol (carvacrol), and 1,8-cineole (eucalyptol), were tested as potential disruptants of the bait attractiveness, given their proven repellency on different insect groups (Evergetis et al. 2018, Oliveira et al. 2018, da Silva and Ricci-Júnior 2020, Lee et al. 2020). Carvacrol (98%) and eucalyptol (>97%) were obtained from Merck/Sigma–Aldrich (Madrid, Spain), while thymol (>98%) was acquired from Alfa Aesar (Karlsruhe, Germany). Two different experiments (referred hereafter as Experiment D1 and D2) were designed. In Experiment D1, Ziploc bags (5.5 × 3.5 cm) were used as dispensers, and 1 ml of each compound was loaded onto a cellulose pad (3.5 cm × 2.5 cm) that was enclosed in the Ziploc bags. This type of dispenser allowed to obtain an approximate release rate for each compound as follows: thymol 7 mg/d, carvacrol 3 mg/d, and eucalyptol 59 mg/d. In Experiment D2, the same Ziploc bags were used as dispensers, although in this case 1 ml of the corresponding compound was loaded in a cotton pad (3.5 cm × 2.5 cm), providing approximately the following release rates: thymol 15 mg/d, carvacrol 5 mg/d, and eucalyptol 75 mg/d. Release rates were estimated based on daily weight loss during 2 wk under laboratory conditions before the deployment of each experiment. In both experiments, the corresponding dispenser was hung from the inner top of the bottle trap by using a wire, so that it was aligned with the drilled holes of the bottle walls.

Detection of T. callipaeda in P. variegata Males by Dissection and Molecular Analysis

A total of 300 males of P. variegata obtained during Experiment A were examined for the presence of T. callipaeda L3 larvae. First, live males were taken to the laboratory, dissected under the stereo microscope (4–8×) on a Petri dish with a drop of physiological saline solution, and visually checked for the presence of the nematode in the proboscis.

Second, a total of 390 randomly chosen P. variegata males from Experiments B–D were grouped by collection date and pooled (15 individuals/pool) in vials with ethanol (70%) at –20°C for further molecular analysis. Genomic DNA was extracted from pools using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total DNA was purified using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) and stored at –20°C. The cox1 gene was partially amplified using the primer set COIintF (5′-TGATTGGTGGTTTTGGTAA-3′) and COIintR (5′-ATAAGTACGAGTATCAATATC-3′) following PCR protocol as described previously for Spirurida (Casiraghi et al. 2001). The amplified products of approximately 689 bp were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gels stained with Green Safe Premium (Nzytech, Portugal), using a 100-bp DNA ladder as a molecular weight marker and observed under UV light.

Statistical Analyses

The effect of sampling height (considered as a categorical independent variable) and climatic variables (i.e., temperature and wind, continuous independent variables) on the P. variegata abundance (mean number of flies captures, continuous dependent variable) collected by net sweeping were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models (LMM) fitted by maximum likelihood with Gaussian distribution. The number of insect captures was log-transformed to normalize its distribution. Trapping site was included as random factors to account for the geographical variation of the sampling design.

In addition, to explore the relationship between environmental explanatory variables and P. variegata abundance, the nonparametric algorithm Random Forest (RF) regression analyses based on 1,000 trees was used (Breiman 2001). This is a machine-learning algorithm increasingly being used in ecology during recent years (Cutler et al. 2007, Fox et al. 2017, Brieuc et al. 2018), which makes it possible to identify nonlinear relationships that would otherwise be impossible to trace. The most important variables selected in the model were listed following the percentage of increase in Mean Square Error (%IncMSE) splitting criterion to find the optimal predictors.

On the other hand, the effect of different treatments (i.e., attractive blends, color, and monoterpenoid compound), on the collection of P. variegata in experiments B, C, and D, were analyzed using generalized linear mixed models (GLMM). In each experiment, insect captures per each treatment were included as dependent variable, while bait, trap color, and monoterpenoid compound were set as categorical independent factors. Separate models were performed for each treatment with a negative binomial error distribution and logarithmic link, rather than Poisson distributed error, to reduce model overdispersion caused by the aggregation of captures (Ver Hoef and Boveng 2007, Roiz et al. 2012).

The collinearity between independent variables was tested for each model using the variance inflation factor (VIF; Zuur et al. 2010), and residuals were checked for both the qq-plots and the composite hypothesis of normality with Lilliefors (Kolmogorov–Smirnov) test, due to sampling size was higher than 50 records (Thode 2002). In addition, GLMM overdispersion was controlled using Pearson statistics (ratio of the Pearson χ2 to its degrees of freedom), a common method used for assessing the deviance of goodness-of-fit statistics (Rodríguez 2001). There was no evidence of collinearity between the variables included in the models nor overdispersion, as the Pearson dispersion statistics were always close to 1. The ANOVA analysis of variance was used to calculate the χ2, and post hoc analyses were performed using Tukey contrasts test when significant differences were detected (P ≤ 0.05).

All statistical analyses were conducted in R (v3.6.3; The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Platform 2020) using the following packages: arm, car, lme4, MASS, Matrix, MuMIn, multcomp, randomForest, Rcpp, and stats. Partial dependence plot was developed for showing nonlinear relationships of the predictor variables.

Results

Overall, 5,726 P. variegata flies (96.4% males and 3.6% females) were collected during the summer of 2020 (Experiment A = 247 males and 5 females, Experiment B = 944 males and 5 females, Experiment C = 997 males and 28 females, and Experiment D1 and D2 = 3,051 males and 157 females, and 281 males and 11 females, respectively). The percentage of females captured differed depending on the month as follows: June (0%), July (0.8%), August (4.2%), and September (16.6%). Up to 86% of the females were gravid.

Experiment A

A total of 252 individuals of P. variegata flies were captured by net sweeping at three different heights, showing an overall pronounced male-biased sex ratio (98%). Those collected around the human body accounted for 56%, followed by 40% gathered below the canopy (200–220 cm from ground) and only 4% at ground level. Overall, the explained variance for the P. variegata abundance LMM was 35.5% (variance of the predictions divided by the variance of the response). Briefly, significantly more captures were found both around the collector's body (Tukey post hoc test, estimate ± SE = 0.579 ± 0.166, df = 37, z = 3.498, P = 0.001) and below the canopy (estimate ± SE = 0.057 ± 0.165, df = 37, z = 3.446, P = 0.002) than at ground level. Also, a marginally significant positive relationship between insect abundance and the temperature (estimate ± SE = 0.022 ± 0.011, df = 37, t = 2.010, P = 0.051) was found. Here, the partial plot evidenced by the RF showed an increasing nonlinear trend between the abundance of the flies and temperature, with two peaks at 24 and 33°C (Fig. 2). The minimum daily temperature recorded with catches was 13.0°C and the maximum 33.5°C.

Experiment B

A total of 949 P. variegata flies were caught in this trial. Significant differences were found in the attractiveness of the different baits (χ2 = 16.034, df = 2, P ≤ 0.001). The binary blend of red wine and cider vinegar was significantly more attractive to flies than the mixture of fruits (Tukey post hoc test, estimate ± SE = 1.954 ± 0.747, z = 2.615, P = 0.024) and yeast plus sugar (estimate ± SE = 2.976 ± 0.759, z = 3.920, P ≤ 0.001; Fig. 3). No significant differences were recorded between the mixture of fruits and yeast plus sugar. In terms of specificity, the binary blend yielded the best results, with the least number of nontarget insects (mainly Drosophila spp.) trapped (12%), whereas the mixture of fruits and yeast plus sugar accounted for 68% and 28% of drosophilid by-catch, respectively.

Experiment C

A total of 1,025 P. variegata flies were trapped in the experiment, varying significantly according to the trap color (χ2 = 22.241, df = 3, P = <0.001). Yellow baited-traps captured fewer flies than both black (Tukey post hoc test, estimate ± SE = –1.909 ± 0.4224, z = –4.519, P = <0.001) and transparent baited-traps (estimate ± SE = –1.451 ± 0.425, z = –3.411, P = 0.004; Fig. 4). In contrast, no significant differences were detected between the number of caches found in red, black, and transparent traps (Fig. 4).

Fig. 2.

Partial dependence plot for the RF analyses between Phortica variegata abundance (log-transformed) and the temperature (°C) of each sampling date (n = 247).

img-z5-6_328.jpg

Experiment D

A total of 3,208 and 292 P. variegata flies were collected in the Experiments D1 (low release rate) and D2 (high release rate), respectively. No significant reduction in trap catches was found for any of the monoterpenoids in Experiment D1. Conversely, a significant reduction in the number of catches was observed in Experiment D2 (χ2 = 9.347, df = 3, P = 0.025). Traps baited with carvacrol (release rate ca. 5 mg/d) significantly collected fewer P. variegata flies compared to control traps (Tukey post hoc test, estimate ± SE = –1.665 ± 0.552, z = –3.014, P = 0.014; Fig. 5). No significant differences were found for traps releasing thymol and eucalyptol in comparison to the control trap (Fig. 5).

Detection of T. callipaeda

None of the 690 P. variegata males subjected to dissection (n = 300) and molecular analysis (n = 390) resulted positive in the detection of T. callipaeda larvae.

Fig. 3.

Box-and-whiskers plots of the number of Phortica variegata catches (log-transformed) in traps with different baits. Boxes with different superscript letters are statistically different (P ≤ 0.05).

img-z5-12_328.jpg

Fig. 4.

Box-and-whiskers plots of the number of Phortica variegata catches (log-transformed) in trap bottles of different colors baited with the binary blend of cider vinegar and red wine (50 ml). Boxes with different superscript letters are statistically different (P ≤ 0.05).

img-z5-14_328.jpg

Fig. 5.

Box-and-whiskers plots of the number of Phortica variegata catches (log-transformed) in traps baited with 10 ml of the binary blend of cider vinegar and red wine (VW), and the combination of VW and carvacrol (5 mg/d), eucalyptol (75 mg/d), or thymol (15 mg/d). Asterisk denotes statistical differences between treatments and control (P ≤ 0.05).

img-z6-1_328.jpg

Discussion

Our field sampling revealed the abundant presence of P. variegata in a Q. pyrenaica forest in northern Spain, in agreement with previous works that highlight deciduous woods with continental Mediterranean climate as a common ecological niche for this species (Otranto et al. 2006a, Palfreyman et al. 2018). Unfortunately, the resting places of this species within this habitat remain still unknown, although Phortica spp. are predominantly dwelling in the tree canopy (Toda 1987, Máca and Otranto 2014) and trunks (Chen et al. 2006). Net sweeping showed that P. variegata rarely rests on vegetation at ground level, and both aerial sweeping and around the eyes of the collector were efficient methods to collect flying adults. The relative high number of aerial collections might indicate that a reasonable number of flies were flying in the sunny and shade areas within the oak grove, most likely patrolling along the forest tracks, as reported by Máca and Otranto (2014). Among the climatic features considered, temperature was demonstrated to have a significant influence on the activity of the species, as revealed by our sweep netting data. In fact, a positive correlation between the number of catches and the mean temperature was recorded. The role of temperature as an important driver of P. variegata abundance has been recently addressed by Pombi et al. (2020), who detected a direct correlation between temperature and population dynamics of P. variegata in different countries. Our observations indicate that these flies start flying at 18°C and temperatures above, as almost no flies were captured at lower temperatures. Indeed, temperature drops below 16°C interrupt the activity of the fly, and lower than 10°C provokes a sharp cease of activity (Otranto et al. 2006a). Nonetheless, and although overwintering is known to occur in P. variegata (Otranto et al. 2005), those environmental factors that may be responsible of triggering the end of this diapausing period have not been determined yet. Additional climatic variables that may be correlated with the abundance of males, such as relative humidity and barometric pressure (Pombi et al. 2020), were not taken into consideration in our study.

Field trapping collections revealed that the activity of P. variegata males in the Basque Country expands from at least June until September. Interestingly, our collections were strongly male-biased throughout the trapping period, regardless of the sampling method employed. However, a marked increase in the proportion of females was observed at the end of summer. It is well known that males of P. variegata are predominant in flying around the eyes of the host (Otranto et al. 2006a). However, the ratio of females to males is still a controversial issue, with differing findings depending on the sampling methodology and even season. For instance, remarkable changes in sex ratio have been observed when netting around host eyes and fruit baits in Italy, and they seemed to vary widely according to seasonality (Otranto et al. 2006a, b). Fly collections in southern Italy revealed that, while females were predominant from May to June, the prevalence of males increased in August, drastically biasing to a male:female ratio of 181:1 by September–October (Otranto et al. 2006b). However, Roggero et al. (2010) observed an overall predominance of females regardless of the season in Switzerland. In our field trials, males prevailed during the whole sampling period (i.e., from June to September), albeit, it is also worth noting that a high percentage of trapped females with the binary blend of cider vinegar and red wine was reported as gravid from July to September. We suggest that reproductive and/or mating status may be modulating the attraction towards this bait, as reported for other drosophilids (Matsunaga et al. 1995, Wong et al. 2018, Clymans et al. 2019). For instance, in other Steganinae species, females and immature males are attracted to fruit baits, while reproductively mature males are not (Matsunaga et al. 1995). Additionally, nongravid females of the major crop pest Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae), are more attracted to fermented-based fruits (Wong et al. 2018). In contrast to one would expect, gravid females were attracted to fermented baits in our study. Taken into consideration that natural oviposition substrates of P. variegata are still unknown, and their ability to lay eggs on fresh fruit under artificial conditions (Otranto et al. 2012), our findings suggest that protein intake from this kind of baits may be of an undetermined relevance for the physiology of egg-bearing females. Therefore, a long-term monitoring of populations would allow to infer the factors mediating these shifts in population dynamics, which in turn may shed light on the ecological implications underlying the attraction on both sexes of P. variegata mediated by the binary blend of vinegar and wine.

Our outcomes have demonstrated for the first time the suitability of red wine and cider vinegar as a cost-effective approach for trapping P. variegata. The binary blend proved to be more attractive and selective when compared to traditional fruit-based baits (Roggero et al. 2010). This blend has previously been reported to be highly attractive to drosophilid species, such as D. suzukii and the African fig fly Zaprionus indianus (Landolt et al. 2012, Cha et al. 2015a). Another congeneric species, Phortica semivirgo, has previously been found in traps filled with red wine and apple vinegar in Hungary (Kerezsi et al. 2019). In Phortica spp., lachryphagy is considered to be the main zoophilic feeding habit, although they are also often found feeding on fruits, fermenting substrates, and sap fluxes of tree trunks (Chen et al. 2006, Otranto et al. 2006b, Bächli et al. 2008, Máca and Otranto 2014). In contrast, some genera of Steganinae are known to be rarely attracted to beer or fruit baits, such as Cacoxenus, Stegana, Gitona, and Leucophenga (Otranto et al. 2008). This attraction towards fermented cues is in concordance to some extent with many species within the subfamily Drosophilinae, which find rotten and decaying substrates as suitable for breeding and/or feeding. Indeed, fermentation-related volatiles have been demonstrated to play a pivotal role as olfactory cues mediating attraction (Becher et al. 2010, 2012; Kleiber et al. 2014; Cha et al. 2015a), and therefore the use of different fermented products-releasing baits have been widespread used for drosophilid trapping (West 1961, Bächli et al. 2008, Cooper et al. 2012, Landolt et al. 2012, Epsky et al. 2014, Iglesias et al. 2014, Hottel et al. 2015, Cruz-Esteban et al. 2021). Thus, our results provide a robust basis for considering the binary blend as a promising tool for monitoring and/or mass trapping of P. variegata, albeit a simplification of this mixture into a multicomponent bait may represent a more selective attractant (Cha et al. 2015b). Therefore, further studies on the olfactory and behavioral response of male P. variegata are needed to elucidate which key active volatiles in the binary mixture are responsible for mediating the attraction to improve the current blend.

The orientation of P. variegata males toward a colored stimulus has not been addressed so far. According to our results, the color of the trap does not appear to be a key factor in the attraction to the trap when combined with the binary mixture of wine and vinegar. Three of the colored visual stimuli (i.e., transparent, black, and red) performed similarly, with only the yellow color showing a negative effect on captures. This aversive behavior was also observed for yellow sticky traps placed on trees (data not shown). The influence of yellow color in the number of catches has also been noticed for some Drosophilidae. In the case of D. suzukii, different studies have pointed out that the avoidance or preference for yellow color depends on the bait type (Iglesias et al. 2014, Bolton et al. 2021). In this regard, the number of D. suzukii found in yellow traps increases synergistically with the leaf volatile β-cyclocitral, whilst the preference for this color is reduced in presence of host or yeast-odors (Bolton et al. 2021). Similarly, Iglesias et al. (2014) observed that catches of yellow traps baited with apple cider vinegar did not increase. However, yellow and yellow-green cards are the most attractive stimuli for Z. indianus when deployed with a commercial bait (Cruz-Esteban et al. 2021). In the case of P. variegata males, the negative effect of yellow color might be related to the host seeking behavior of the species, as observed for other flies. For example, in the case of horse flies and deer flies (Diptera: Tabanidae), yellow and green-colored trapping systems have been demonstrated to be less attractive for females than, for instance, black and red colors (Bracken et al. 1962, Allan and Stoffolano 1986). This behavior has been associated to the lack of contrast of the target with regard to the surrounding background, a relevant fact that it is certainly related to host location and orientation (Allan and Stoffolano 1986). In a similar vein, although those stimuli governing the orientation of P. variegata males to hosts are still unknown, we suggest that visual cues may be relevant in long-range host seeking.

To our knowledge, no research based on repellency studies on P. variegata has been published. Among the monoterpenoids evaluated, only carvacrol significantly reduced the number of male captures at the highest release rate (ca. 5 mg/d). Previous studies have demonstrated the repellency of this compound on arthropods of medical-veterinary interest (Park et al. 2005, Masoumi et al. 2016, Evergetis et al. 2018, Lima et al. 2019) and on crop insect pests (Lee et al. 2020, Ramadan et al. 2020). Conversely, none of the release rates of thymol and eucalyptol elicited a disruptive effect on the bait-mediated attraction. Both thymol and eucalyptol show relevant bioactivity on D. suzukii as repellent and oviposition deterrent respectively (Erland et al. 2015, Renkema et al. 2016). In the case of thymol, an isomer of carvacrol, no repellency was detected, even when released from cotton discs at a release rate of approximately 15 mg/d, three times higher than that reported for carvacrol in the cellulose-containing Ziploc bags. Similarly, eucalyptol did not interrupt the attraction to the traps, despite being released at approximately five times the rate of carvacrol. Nevertheless, it should be pointed out that our assay represents a preliminary field test and, consequently, additional research would be required to fully address the feasibility of carvacrol as an effective repellent of P. variegata under natural conditions.

In spite of the availability of potential primary hosts (e.g., red foxes) in the sampling area, the oriental eyeworm T. callipaeda was not detected neither by dissection nor by PCR amplification in any of the pools of male flies examined. Nevertheless, the absence of the parasite in our samples should not be striking, as the infection rate under natural conditions has been reported to be very low. Indeed, only 1.34% of feral males were detected harboring T. callipaeda larval stages in a long-term (from April to November) and exhaustive (969 netted individuals of both sexes) fly collection conducted in southern Italy (Otranto et al. 2006b). For instance, and even though infestations by T. callipaeda in red foxes are known to occur in different countries with varying degrees of prevalence (Otranto et al. 2009, Hodžić et al. 2014, Čabanová et al. 2018, Ionică et al. 2018), the role of this wild carnivore species as a reservoir of the parasite in wildlife remains unknown. It is also noteworthy that so far, no autochthonous T. callipaeda infestations have been found in dogs in the Basque Country, with only five records of imported cases occurring since 2014 (Marino et al. 2020).

Taken together, these results represent a better understanding of the chemical ecology of P. variegata, providing a preliminary basis for the development of a promising management tool for P. variegata based on an easily customized trap and a food bait. In addition, our results suggest carvacrol as a potential repellent compound, deserving thus future in-depth research to unravel its applicability against P. variegata. In this regard, not only the use of an effective bait, but also the inclusion of a strong repellent, could be considered as promising tools for the control of P. variegata under a push–pull management strategy. The achievement of this goal would substantially contribute to develop a preventive measure against the spread of thelaziosis disease.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks are given to the manager of the Izki Golf Club for providing the funding to complete part of the study. M.F. is currently funded by European Union Horizon 2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (844285; ‘EpiEcoMod’). We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their many insightful comments and suggestions which helped us to significantly improve the manuscript. This study is part of a work awarded in 2021 with the “III Premio Nacional Felix Pérez y Pérez” of the Illustrious Official College of Veterinarians of Burgos, Spain.

References Cited

1.

Allan, S. A., and J. G. Stoffolano. 1986. The effects of hue and intensity on visual attraction of adult Tabanus nigrovittatus (Diptera: Tabanidae). J. Med. Entomol. 23: 83–91. Google Scholar

2.

Bächli, G., E. Schatzmann, and E. Haring. 2008. On some population parameters of drosophilids in Switzerland (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Mitt. Schweiz. Entomol. Ges. 81: 243–260. Google Scholar

3.

Becher, P. G., M. Bengtsson, B. S. Hansson, and P. Witzgall. 2010. Flying the fly: long-range flight behavior of Drosophila melanogaster to attractive odors. J. Chem. Ecol. 36: 599–607. Google Scholar

4.

Becher, P. G., G. Flick, E. Rozpedowska, A. Schmidt, A. Hagman, S. Lebreton, M. C. Larsson, B. S. Hansson, J. Piškur, P. Witzgall, et al. 2012. Yeast, not fruit volatiles mediate Drosophila melanogaster attraction, oviposition and development. Funct. Ecol. 26: 822–828. Google Scholar

5.

Bolton, L. G., J. C. Piñero, and B. A. Barrett. 2021. Olfactory cues from host- and non-host plant odor influence the behavioral responses of adult Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) to visual cues. Environ. Entomol. 50: 571–579. Google Scholar

6.

Bracken, G. K., W. Hanec, and A. J. Thorsteinson. 1962. The orientation of horse flies and deer flies (Tabanidae: Diptera): II. The role of some visual factors in the attractiveness of decoy silhouettes. Can. J. Zool. 40: 685–695. Google Scholar

7.

Breiman, L. 2001. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45: 5–32. Google Scholar

8.

Brieuc, M. S. O., C. D. Waters, D. P. Drinan, and K. A. Naish. 2018. A practical introduction to random forest for genetic association studies in ecology and evolution. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 18: 755–766. Google Scholar

9.

Čabanová, V., M. Miterpáková, M. Oravec, Z. Hurníková, S. Jerg, G. Nemčíková, and M. B. Červenská. 2018. Nematode Thelazia callipaeda is spreading across Europe. The first survey of red foxes from Slovakia. Acta Parasitol. 63: 160–166. Google Scholar

10.

Casiraghi, M., T. J. Anderson, C. Bandi, C. Bazzocchi, and C. Genchi. 2001. A phylogenetic analysis of filarial nematodes: comparison with the phylogeny of Wolbachia endosymbionts. Parasitology. 122: 93–103. Google Scholar

11.

Cha, D. H., M. A. Gill, N. D. Epsky, C. T. Werle, J. J. Adamczyk, and P. J. Landolt. 2015a. From a non-target to a target: identification of a fermentation volatile blend attractive to Zaprionus indianus. J. Appl. Entomol. 139: 114–122. Google Scholar

12.

Cha, D. H., S. P. Hesler, S. Park, T. B. Adams, R. S. Zack, H. Rogg, G. M. Loeb, and P. J. Landolt. 2015b. Simpler is better: fewer non-target insects trapped with a four-component chemical lure vs. a chemically more complex food-type bait for Drosophila suzukii. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 154: 251–260. Google Scholar

13.

Chen, H. W., J. J. Gao, and S. Y. Wen. 2006. Species diversity of the genus Phortica Schiner in Yunnan, China, with descriptions of nine new species (Diptera, Drosophildae). J. Nat. Hist. 39: 3951–3978. Google Scholar

14.

Clymans, R., V. Van Kerckvoorde, E. Bangels, W. Akkermans, A. Alhmedi, P. De Clercq, T. Beliën, and D. Bylemans. 2019. Olfactory preference of Drosophila suzukii shifts between fruit and fermentation cues over the season: effects of physiological status. Insects 10: 200. Google Scholar

15.

Cooper, N. W., M. A. Thomas, M. B. Garfinkel, K. L. Schneider, and P. P. Marra. 2012. Comparing the precision, accuracy, and efficiency of branch clipping and sweep netting for sampling arthropods in two Jamaican forest types. J. F. Ornithol. 83: 381–390. Google Scholar

16.

Cruz-Esteban, S., E. Garay-Serrano, and J. C. Rojas. 2021. Effect of visual cues and a fermentation-based attractant blend on trap catch of two invasive Drosophila flies in Berry Crops in Mexico. J. Econ. Entomol. 114: 152–160. Google Scholar

17.

Cupertino, M. C., M. Resende, N. A. Mayer, L. Carvalho, and R. Siqueira-Batista. 2020. Emerging and re-emerging human infectious diseases: a systematic review of the role of wild animals with a focus on public health impact. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 13: 99–106. Google Scholar

18.

Cutler, D. R., T. C. Edwards, Jr , K. H. Beard, A. Cutler, K. T. Hess, J. Gibson, and J. J. Lawler. 2007. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88: 2783–2792. Google Scholar

19.

Do Vale, B., A. P. Lopes, M. Da Conceição Fontes, M. Silvestre, L. Cardoso, and A. C. Coelho. 2020. Systematic review on infection and disease caused by Thelazia callipaeda in Europe: 2001–2020. Parasite 27: 52. Google Scholar

20.

Dolff, S., J. Kehrmann, P. Eisermann, S. Dalbah, D. Tappe, and P. Rating. 2020. Case report: Thelazia callipaeda eye infection: the first human case in Germany. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 102: 350–351. Google Scholar

21.

Dorchies, P., G. Chaudieu, L. A. Siméon, G. Cazalot, C. Cantacessi, and D. Otranto. 2007. First reports of autochthonous eyeworm infection by Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) in dogs and cat from France. Vet. Parasitol. 149: 294–297. Google Scholar

22.

Epsky, N. D., M. A. Gill, D. H. Cha, and P. J. Landolt. 2014. Trapping the African fig fly (Diptera: Drosophilidae) with combinations of vinegar and wine. Fla. Entomol. 97: 85–89. Google Scholar

23.

Erland, L. A., M. Rheault, and S. Mahmoud. 2015. Insecticidal and oviposition deterrent effects of essential oils and their constituents against the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Crop Prot. 78: 20–26. Google Scholar

24.

Evergetis, E., R. Bellini, G. Balatsos, A. Michaelakis, M. Carrieri, R. Veronesi, D. P. Papachristos, A. Puggioli, V. N. Kapsaski-Kanelli, and S. A. Haroutounian. 2018. From bio-prospecting to field assessment: the case of carvacrol rich essential oil as a potent mosquito larvicidal and repellent agent. Front. Ecol. Evol. 6: 204. Google Scholar

25.

Fox, E. W., R. A. Hill, S. G. Leibowitz, A. R. Olsen, D. J. Thornbrugh, and M. H. Weber. 2017. Assessing the accuracy and stability of variable selection methods for random forest modeling in ecology. Environ. Monit. Assess. 189: 316. Google Scholar

26.

Fuentes, I., I. Montes, J. M. Saugar, S. Latrofa, T. Gárate, and D. Otranto. 2012. Thelaziosis in humans, a zoonotic infection, Spain, 2011. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 18: 2073–2075. Google Scholar

27.

Graham-Brown, J., P. Gilmore, V. Colella, L. Moss, C. Dixon, M. Andrews, P. Arbeid, J. Barber, D. Timofte, J. McGarry, et al. 2017. Three cases of imported eyeworm infection in dogs: a new threat for the United Kingdom. Vet. Rec. 181: 346. Google Scholar

28.

Hodžić, A., M. S. Latrofa, G. Annoscia, A. Alić, R. Beck, R. P. Lia, F. Dantas-Torres, and D. Otranto. 2014. The spread of zoonotic Thelazia callipaeda in the Balkan area. Parasit. Vectors 7: 352. Google Scholar

29.

Hottel, B. A., J. L. Spencer, and S. T. Ratcliffe. 2015. Trapping Drosophila repleta (Diptera: Drosophilidae) using color and volatiles. Fla. Entomol. 98: 272–275. Google Scholar

30.

Iglesias, L. E., T. W. Nyoike, and O. E. Liburd. 2014. Effect of trap design, bait type, and age on captures of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in berry crops. J. Econ. Entomol. 107: 1508–1518. Google Scholar

31.

Ionică, A. M., G. Deak, I. A. Matei, G. D'Amico, V. D. Cotuţiu, C. M. Gherman, and A. D. Mihalca. 2018. Thelazia callipaeda, an endemic parasite of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Western Romania. J. Wildl. Dis. 54: 829–833. Google Scholar

32.

Kerezsi, V., B. Kiss, F. Deutsch, and J. Kontschan. 2019. First record of Blattisocius mali (Oudemans, 1929) in Hungary associated with the drosophilid fly Phortica semivirgo (Máca, 1977). Redia 102: 69–72. Google Scholar

33.

Kleiber, J. R., C. R. Unelius, J. C. Lee, D. M. Suckling, M. C. Qian, and D. J. Bruck. 2014. Attractiveness of fermentation and related products to spotted wing drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Environ. Entomol. 43: 439–447. Google Scholar

34.

Landolt, P. J., T. Adams, and H. Rogg. 2012. Trapping spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae), with combinations of vinegar and wine, and acetic acid and ethanol. J. Appl. Entomol. 136: 148–154. Google Scholar

35.

Lee, S. C., S. M. Seo, M. J. Huh, J. H. Kwon, I. Nam, J. H. Park, and I. K. Park. 2020. Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of ajowan (Trachyspermum ammi Sprague) (Apiales: Apiaceae) essential oil and its constituents on nymphal and adult bean bugs, Riptortus clavatus (Thunberg) (Hemiptera: Alydidae). Insects 11: 104. Google Scholar

36.

Lima, A. D. S., G. A. Landulfo, and L. M. Costa-Junior. 2019. Repellent effects of encapsulated carvacrol on the Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae). J. Med. Entomol. 56: 881–885. Google Scholar

37.

Máca, J. 1977. Revision of Palaearctic species of Amiota subg. Phortica (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Acta Ent. Bohemoslov. 74: 115–130. Google Scholar

38.

Máca, J., and D. Otranto. 2014. Drosophilidae feeding on animals and the inherent mystery of their parasitism. Parasit. Vectors 7: 1–8. Google Scholar

39.

Maia, C., A. L. Catarino, B. Almeida, C. Ramos, L. Campino, and L. Cardoso. 2016. Emergence of Thelazia callipaeda infection in dogs and cats from East-Central Portugal. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 63: 416–421. Google Scholar

40.

Marino, V., R. Gálvez, V. Colella, J. Sarquis, R. Checa, A. Montoya, J. P. Barrera, S. Domínguez, R. P. Lia, D. Otranto, et al. 2018. Detection of Thelazia callipaeda in Phortica variegata and spread of canine thelaziosis to new areas in Spain. Parasit. Vectors 11: 1–10. Google Scholar

41.

Marino, V., R. Gálvez, A. Montoya, C. Mascuñán, M. Hernández, J. P. Barrera, I. Domínguez, C. Zenker, R. Checa, J. Sarquis, et al. 2020. Spain as a dispersion model for Thelazia callipaeda eyeworm in dogs in Europe. Prev. Vet. Med. 175: 104883. Google Scholar

42.

Masoumi, F., M. R. Youssefi, and M. A. Tabari. 2016. Combination of carvacrol and thymol against the poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae). Parasitol. Res. 115: 4239–4243. Google Scholar

43.

Matsunaga, K., H. Takahashi, T. Yoshida, and M. T. Kimura. 1995. Feeding, reproductive and locomotor activities in diapausing and non-diapausing adults of Drosophila. Ecol. Res. 10: 87–93. Google Scholar

44.

Miró, G., A. Montoya, L. Hernández, D. Dado, M. V. Vázquez, M. Benito, M. Villagrasa, E. Brianti, and D. Otranto. 2011. Thelazia callipaeda: infection in dogs: a new parasite for Spain. Parasit. Vectors. 4: 148. Google Scholar

45.

Oliveira, A. P., A. A. Santos, A. S. Santana, A. P. S. Lima, C. R. Melo, E. D. R. Santana, T. S. Sampaio, A. F. Blank, A. P. A. Araújo, P. F. Cristaldo, et al. 2018. Essential oil of Lippia sidoides and its major compound thymol: toxicity and walking response of populations of Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Crop Prot. 112: 33–38. Google Scholar

46.

Otranto, D., and M. Dutto. 2008. Human thelaziasis, Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 14: 647–649. Google Scholar

47.

Otranto, D., E. Ferroglio, R. P. Lia, D. Traversa, and L. Rossi. 2003. Current status and epidemiological observation of Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) in dogs, cats and foxes in Italy: a “coincidence” or a parasitic disease of the Old Continent? Vet. Parasitol. 116: 315–325. Google Scholar

48.

Otranto, D., R. P. Lia, C. Cantacessi, G. Testini, A. Troccoli, J. L. Shen, and Z. X. Wang. 2005. Nematode biology and larval development of Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) in the drosophilid intermediate host in Europe and China. Parasitology 131: 847–855. Google Scholar

49.

Otranto, D., E. Brianti, C. Cantacessi, R. P. Lia, and J. Máca. 2006a. The zoophilic fruitfly Phortica variegata: morphology, ecology and biological niche. Med. Vet. Entomol. 20: 358–364. Google Scholar

50.

Otranto, D., C. Cantacessi, G. Testini, and R. P. Lia. 2006b. Phortica variegata as an intermediate host of Thelazia callipaeda under natural conditions: evidence for pathogen transmission by a male arthropod vector. Int. J. Parasitol. 36: 1167–1173. Google Scholar

51.

Otranto, D., J. R. Stevens, G. Testini, C. Cantacessi, and J. Máca. 2008. Molecular characterization and phylogenesis of Steganinae (Diptera, Drosophilidae) inferred by the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1. Med. Vet. Entomol. 22: 37–47. Google Scholar

52.

Otranto, D., F. Dantas-Torres, E. Mallia, P. M. DiGeronimo, E. Brianti, G. Testini, D. Traversa, and R. P. Lia. 2009. Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) in wild animals: report of new host species and ecological implications. Vet. Parasitol. 166: 262–267. Google Scholar

53.

Otranto, D., C. Cantacessi, R. P. Lia, I. C. Kadow, S. K. Purayil, F. Dantas-Torres, and J. Máca. 2012. First laboratory culture of Phortica variegata (Diptera, Steganinae), a vector of Thelazia callipaeda. J. Vector Ecol. 37: 458–461. Google Scholar

54.

Otranto, D., F. Dantas-Torres, E. Brianti, D. Traversa, D. Petrić, C. Genchi, and G. Capelli. 2013. Vector-borne helminths of dogs and humans in Europe. Parasit. Vectors 6: 16. Google Scholar

55.

Otranto, D., R. Iatta, R. P. Lia, M. A. Cavalera, J. Máca, M. Pombi, F. Dantas-Torres, and J. Jaenike. 2018. Competence of Phortica variegata from the United States as an intermediate host of the Thelazia callipaeda eyeworm. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 98: 1175–1178. Google Scholar

56.

Otranto, D., J. A. Mendoza-Roldan, and F. Dantas-Torres. 2021. Thelazia callipaeda. Trends Parasitol. 37: 263–264. Google Scholar

57.

Palfreyman, J., J. Graham-Brown, C. Caminade, P. Gilmore, D. Otranto, and D. J. L. Williams. 2018. Predicting the distribution of Phortica variegata and potential for Thelazia callipaeda transmission in Europe and the United Kingdom. Parasit. Vectors 11: 1–8. Google Scholar

58.

Paradžik, M. T., K. Samardžić, T. Živičnjak, F. Martinković, Ž. Janjetović, and M. Miletić-Medved. 2016. Thelazia callipaeda—first human case of thelaziosis in Croatia. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 128: 221–223. Google Scholar

59.

Park, B. S., W. S. Choi, J. H. Kim, K. H. Kim, and S. E. Lee. 2005. Monoterpenes from thyme (Thymus vulgaris) as potential mosquito repellents. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 21: 80–83. Google Scholar

60.

Pombi, M., V. Marino, J. Jaenike, J. Graham-Brown, I. Bernardini, R. P. Lia, F. Beugnet, G. Miró, and D. Otranto. 2020. Temperature is a common climatic descriptor of lachryphagous activity period in Phortica variegata (Diptera: Drosophilidae) from multiple geographical locations. Parasit. Vectors 13: 1–9. Google Scholar

61.

Ramadan, G. R. M., S. A. M. Abdelgaleil, M. S. Shawir, A. S. El-bakary, K. Y. Zhu, and T. W. Phillips. 2020. Terpenoids, DEET and short chain fatty acids as toxicants and repellents for Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) and Lasioderma serricorne (Coleoptera: Ptinidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 87: 101610. Google Scholar

62.

Renkema, J. M., D. Wright, R. Buitenhuis, and R. H. Hallett. 2016. Plant essential oils and potassium metabisulfite as repellents for Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Sci. Rep. 6: 21432. Google Scholar

63.

Rodríguez, G. 2001. Models for over-dispersed count data generalized linear models. Princenton University. (  http://data.princenton.edu/wws509/stata/overdispersion.html ). Google Scholar

64.

Roggero, C., F. Schaffner, G. Bächli, A. Mathis, and M. Schnyder. 2010. Survey of Phortica drosophilid flies within and outside of a recently identified transmission area of the eye worm Thelazia callipaeda in Switzerland. Vet. Parasitol. 171: 58–67. Google Scholar

65.

Roiz, D., M. Roussel, J. Muñoz, S. Ruiz, R. Soriguer, and J. Figuerola. 2012. Efficacy of mosquito traps for collecting potential West Nile mosquito vectors in a natural Mediterranean wetland. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 86: 642–648. Google Scholar

66.

Rossi, L., and P. P. Bertaglia. 1989. Presence of Thelazia callipaeda Railliet & Henry, 1910, in Piedmont, Italy. Parassitologia 31: 167–172. Google Scholar

67.

Schwartz, A. B., M. Lejeune, G. Verocai, R. Young, and P. Schwartz. 2021. Autochthonous Thelazia callipaeda infection in dog, New York, USA, 2020. Emerg. Infect. Dis. J. 27: 1923. Google Scholar

68.

Seixas, F., P. Travassos, T. Coutinho, A. P. Lopes, M. S. Latrofa, M. D. A. Pires, L. Cardoso, and D. Otranto. 2018. The eyeworm Thelazia callipaeda in Portugal: current status of infection in pets and wild mammals and case report in a beech marten (Martes foina). Vet. Parasitol. 252: 163–166. Google Scholar

69.

da Silva, M. R. M., and E. Ricci-Júnior. 2020. An approach to natural insect repellent formulations: from basic research to technological development. Acta Trop. 212: 105419. Google Scholar

70.

Silva, L. M. R., S. Spoerel, L. Wiesner, M. Klein, N. Pantchev, A. Taubert, and C. Hermosilla. 2020. Ophthalmic Thelazia callipaeda infections: first feline and new canine imported cases in Germany. Parasitol. Res. 119: 3099–3104. Google Scholar

71.

Tasić-Otašević, S., S. Gabrielli, M. Trenkić-Božinović, A. Petrović, B. Gajić, V. Colella, S. Momčilović, G. Cancrini, and D. Otranto. 2016. Eyeworm infections in dogs and in a human patient in Serbia: a One Health approach is needed. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 45: 20–22. Google Scholar

72.

Toda, M. 1987. Vertical microdistribution of Drosophilidae (Diptera) within various forests in Hokkaido: III. The Tomakomai Experiment Forest, Hokkaido University. Res. Bull. Coll. Exper. For. 44: 611–632. Google Scholar

73.

Thode, H. C. 2002. Testing for normality. CRC Press, New York. Google Scholar

74.

Ver Hoef, J. M., and P. L. Boveng. 2007. Quasi-Poisson vs. negative binomial regression: how should we model overdispersed count data? Ecology 88: 2766–2772. Google Scholar

75.

Vorou, R. M., V. G. Papavassiliou, and S. Tsiodras. 2007. Emerging zoonoses and vector-borne infections affecting humans in Europe. Epidemiol. Infect. 135: 1231–1247. Google Scholar

76.

Weiss, L. M. 2008. Zoonotic parasitic diseases: emerging issues and problems. Int. J. Parasitol. 38: 1209–1210. Google Scholar

77.

West, A. S. 1961. Chemical attractants for adults Drosophila species. J. Econ. Entomol. 54: 677–681. Google Scholar

78.

Wong, J. S., A. K. Wallingford, G. M. Loeb, and J. C. Lee. 2018. Physiological status of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) affects their response to attractive odours. J. Appl. Entomol. 142: 473–482. Google Scholar

79.

Zuur, A. F., E. N. Ieno, and C. S. Elphick. 2010. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1: 3–14. Google Scholar
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.
M. A. González, D. Bravo-Barriga, P. M. Alarcón-Elbal, J. M. Álvarez-Calero, C. Quero, M. Ferraguti, and S. López "Development of Novel Management Tools for Phortica variegata (Diptera: Drosophilidae), Vector of the Oriental Eyeworm, Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida: Thelaziidae), in Europe," Journal of Medical Entomology 59(1), 328-336, (8 November 2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjab171
Received: 2 August 2021; Accepted: 21 September 2021; Published: 8 November 2021
KEYWORDS
bait
color
field test
netting
zoophilic fruit fly
Back to Top