Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
21 September 2022 Larval Mortality and Ovipositional Preference in Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) Induced by the Entomopathogenic Fungus Beauveria bassiana (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae)
John M. Kirsch, Jia-Wei Tay
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Entomopathogenic fungi allow chemical-free and environmentally safe vector management. Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo-Crivelli) Vuillemin is a promising biological control agent and an important component of integrated vector management. We investigated the mortality of Aedes albopictus (Skuse) larvae exposed to five concentrations of B. bassiana using Mycotrol ESO and adult oviposition behavior to analyze the egg-laying preferences of wild Ae. albopictus in response to different fungal concentrations. We examined the mortality of mid-instars exposed to B. bassiana concentrations of 1 × 104, 1 × 105, 1 × 106, 1 × 107, and 1 × 108 conidia/ml every 24 h for 12 d. In the oviposition behavior study, the fungus was applied to wooden paddles at 1 × 105, 1 × 107, and 1 × 109 conidia/ml, and the paddles were individually placed into quad-ovitraps. Both experiments contained control groups without B. bassiana. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed that larval mortality was concentration dependent. The median lethal concentration was 2.43 × 105 conidia/ml on d 12. The median lethal time was 3.68 d at 1 × 106 conidia/ml. Oviposition monitoring revealed no significant difference in egg count between the control and treatment paddles. We observed an inverse relationship between the concentration of B. bassiana and the percentage of paddles with eggs. We concluded that concentrations above 1 × 106 conidia/ml are larvicidal, and Ae. albopictus laid similar numbers of eggs on fungus-impregnated and control wooden substrates; however, they were more likely to oviposit on substrates without B. bassiana. With these findings, we suggest that B. bassiana-infused ovitraps can be used for mosquito population monitoring while also delivering mycopesticides to adult mosquitoes.

The Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus (Skuse), is considered one of the “world's worst invasive alien species” owing to its ability to transmit human and animal diseases and establish itself in a wide range of environments (Lowe et al. 2004). Aedes albopictus breeds in containers and cavities from anthropogenic and natural sources and is able to survive in a wide variety of urban, suburban, and forested habitats (Paupy et al. 2009, Wilson et al. 2020). One of the ultimate goals of vector control, as outlined by the World Health Organization (WHO), is reducing human-vector contact and vector survival (WHO 2017). Worldwide, current management tactics, such as chemical pesticide application, have failed to alleviate biting pressure while contributing to the development of insecticide resistance to multiple classes of insecticides, including pyrethroids and organophosphates (Moyes et al. 2017). Insecticide resistance necessitates the use of 21st century integrated vector management tactics, with special attention given to environmentally safe strategies.

The entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo-Crivelli) Vuillemin (CAS No. 63428-82-0) is a biological control agent that can be incorporated into integrated pest management strategies. Mycopesticides, in rotation with other management tactics, have great potential to slow insecticide resistance development through population suppression and mosquito longevity reduction (Achee et al. 2019). Beauveria bassiana infects hosts through contact with the cuticle, where it adheres and germinates; it then penetrates the insect and extracts hemolymph nutrients, eventually killing the host (Litwin et al. 2020). It has also been proposed that larval death occurs due to secondary metabolites produced by the fungus and mechanical blockage of the siphon and trachea (Clark et al. 1968, Daniel et al. 2016). Entomopathogenic fungi are currently utilized on a variety of hexapod families in agriculture and ornamental crops (Arthurs and Dara 2019, Mascarin et al. 2019), and B. bassiana has been approved for use in In2Care mosquito traps (In2Care BV, Wageningen, Netherlands, EPA Reg. No. 91720-1) (Snetselaar et al. 2014, Su et al. 2020).

The existing literature evaluating B. bassiana as a vector control agent generally focuses on either larvae or adults and either Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) or Anopheles gambiae Giles (Diptera: Culicidae), with few studies analyzing Ae. albopictus in the two developmental stages (Deng et al. 2017, 2019a). Studies evaluating mosquito larval mortality after exposure to various strains of B. bassiana or secondary metabolites produced by the fungus aim to reduce the vector population before adulthood and therefore reduce the risk of disease transmission (Clark et al. 1968, Miranpuri and Khachatourians 1991, Montoya-Treviño et al. 2008, Alcalde-Mosqueira et al. 2014, Daniel et al. 2016, Deng et al. 2017, Vivekanandhan et al. 2018, Deng et al. 2019a, de Luna-Santillana et al. 2020, Vivekanandhan et al. 2020). Additionally, the mortality rates in adult Aedes exposed to B. bassiana varied between 60% and 100%, depending on the length of study and exposure amount, with most studies reporting 80–90% mortality rates (de Paula et al. 2008, Darbro et al. 2012, Deng et al. 2019b, Lee et al. 2019, de Luna-Santillana et al. 2020, Shoukat et al. 2020). However, the aforementioned studies did not analyze fungus-induced behavior and rather focused on olfactory and visual attractants. These strong stimuli likely conceal fungus-induced attraction or repulsion, resulting in unexplored areas involving fungus-induced behavior (Snetselaar et al. 2014, Buckner et al. 2017, Paula et al. 2018, Silva et al. 2018). When mycopesticides are used for the control of adult mosquitoes, they must be applied at a concentration that causes pathogenicity but does not deter contact between the pathogen and host.

In this study, a larval bioassay investigated the mortality of second- and third-instar Ae. albopictus exposed to five different concentrations of B. bassiana in Mycotrol ESO. The second part of the study investigated wild Ae. albopictus ovipositional behavior to determine if three different concentrations of B. bassiana altered the number of eggs laid and percent ovipositon in the ovitraps. With an understanding of these preferences, future vector management research can determine how the use of this entomopathogen would benefit surveillance and management programs.

Materials and Methods

Larval Bioassay

Mosquitoes Aedes albopictus were collected using ovipositional traps from the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa campus and maintained in a colony. Eggs were hatched in distilled water, and larvae were maintained at ambient temperature and humidity (22 ± 1.5°C, 65 ± 10%), with a 12L:12D photoperiod. Larvae were fed a 1:1:1 mixture of brewer’s yeast, skim milk powder, and bovine liver powder (MP Biomedicals LLC., Solon, OH, USA) with 0.4% Vanderzants Vitamin Mixture for Insects (MP Biomedicals LLC., Solon, OH, USA). Adults were provided 10% (w/v) sucrose ad libitum. Adult females were periodically provided a blood meal of defibrinated bovine blood (HemoStat Laboratories, Dixon, CA, USA) warmed at 40°C for a minimum of 20 min via a parafilm-wrapped Petri dish with a heat pack for warmth (Moutailler et al. 2007). Damp filter paper folded in a cone on a Petri dish was provided as an egg-laying substrate and replaced when needed.

Fungus Preparation Beauveria bassiana strain GHA was purchased in the form of Mycotrol ESO (LAM International Corporation, Butte, Montana, USA). Stock Mycotrol ESO was halved with distilled water at a concentration of 1.06 × 1010 conidia/ml (rounded to 1 × 1010). From the stock solution, serial dilutions were prepared using distilled water. Five concentrations of B. bassiana were tested, in addition to a control without fungus. Furthermore, 0.05% of polysorbate 20 (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) was added to each treatment and control to reduce formula separation (Dong et al. 2012). Experimental fungus concentrations were based on previous studies and WHO guidelines (WHO 2005; Deng et al. 2017, 2019a).

Bioassay Twenty-five second- and third-instar Ae. albopictus larvae were added by a transfer pipette to containers with 100 ml of distilled water. Each serial dilution was dispensed into the larval containers for final concentrations of 1 × 108, 1 × 107, 1 × 106, 1 × 105, and 1 × 104 conidia/ml of B. bassiana and a control. Each trial comprised four containers for each treatment and the control. Each container was provided food and maintained at ambient temperature and humidity (22 ± 1.5°C, 65 ± 10%). Mortality was monitored every 24 h for 12 d using established WHO guidelines (WHO 2005). Up to ten mosquito larvae from each container were separated upon death and placed individually in a Petri dish with dampened black filter paper. The dishes were placed in an incubator (18 ± 2°C, RH 65 ± 10%), and fungal presence was later confirmed on the larval carcasses. The experiment was repeated three times, with a total of 300 larvae tested in each treatment and control.

Oviposition Behavior

Trap and Fungus Preparations Mycotrol ESO was diluted with distilled water to produce concentrations of 1 × 105, 1 × 107, and 1 × 109 conidia/ml. The diluted concentrations of B. bassiana were applied to all sides of a wooden paddle with a paint brush and allowed to dry for three h. Twenty-four 473-ml (16 oz.) black plastic cups with five small holes placed at two-thirds the height (approx. 300 ml) were arranged in groups of four to create quad-ovitraps. Three wooden paddles (2.5 × 14.0 × 0.5 cm) on which each concentration of B. bassiana (treatment) was applied and one paddle on which no B. bassiana applied (control) were set in individual cups of the quad-ovitrap, for a total of four paddles ( Supp. Fig. 1 [Online only] (tjac084_suppl_supplementary_figure_1.jpeg)). Each cup was filled with tap water to the overflow holes. Ovitraps were placed in the environment for seven days before servicing, which included collecting and replacing the wooden paddle and tap water. Trapping was conducted for six weeks, totaling 128 trapping events.

Location The study was conducted at six sites, with one quad-ovitrap placed at each site. The sites were located on the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa campus (21.301° N, 157.816° W) at approximately 30 m elevation (USGS 2021). The study was conducted during the end of the transition from the wet winter season to the drier summer season from February-May 2021. The average temperature during the study was 23.44°C, and the average relative humidity was 69.45%. The average weekly rainfall was 2.42 mm. Climatology data were obtained from the Department of Atmospheric Sciences at the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa (UH Mānoa Atmospheric Sciences 2021).

Sample Processing The collected paddles were placed on paper towels for two days to dry. Eggs were counted using a dissecting microscope (Leica M80, Leica Instruments Pte Ltd., Germany). Paddles without eggs were placed in an incubator to allow fungal growth to determine viability. After a two-day embryonation period, paddles with eggs were submerged into individual containers with distilled water and 0.05 g of yeast. Paddles were left submerged for one week to allow hatching. Hatched larvae were reared to adulthood, at which point they were frozen and identified to species (Darsie and Ward 2016).

Statistical Analysis

For the larval bioassay, a Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed using the R package ‘survival’ v.3.2-7, followed by a log-rank test with pairwise comparisons to determine differences in mosquito survivorship between the treatments and the control (Therneau 2021). Lethal concentrations (LC50, LC90, LC99) at d 12 and median lethal time (LT50) were calculated using a probit analysis in the R package ‘ecotox’ v.1.4.2 (Hlina 2021).

For the oviposition behavior experiment, a generalized linear model (GLM) with negative binomial distribution was constructed to determine if there was a difference in the number of eggs laid among the three concentrations of fungus and the control. The goal of the model was to evaluate if concentration of fungus and site had influences on the number of eggs laid on the paddles. The model was constructed using R package ‘MASS’ and best fit was selected using AICc in R package ‘bbmle’ (Akaike 1973, Venables and Ripley 2002, Bolker and R Development Core Team 2020).

Subsequently, a presence or absence GLM with a binomial distribution was constructed to determine if there was a difference in the percentage of paddles with and without eggs by concentration. All paddles that had one or more egg were included in the “present” category, while all paddles that had zero eggs were included in the “absent” category. A log-likelihood ratio test was performed against a null model to determine if the concentration significantly influenced the presence of mosquito eggs. All analyses were performed using R software v. 1.0.143 (R Core Team 2020).

Results

Larval Bioassay

Kaplan–Meier Survival Analysis We conducted a Kaplan–Meier survival analysis followed by pairwise log-rank tests to determine the significant differences among each tested concentration. There was an overall significant effect of fungus concentration on survival of the mosquitoes (χ2 = 67.50, df = 3, p < 0.0001), with all pairwise comparisons resulting in significance; therefore, each concentration of fungus resulted in a different rate of mortality (Fig. 1).

Lethal Concentration On d 12, the percent mortality for the 1 × 108 and 1 × 107 conidia/ml groups was 100% and for the 1 × 106 conidia/ml concentration group, it was slightly lower, at 98.00 ± 0.60%. In the 1 × 105 conidia/ml group, the mortality was 47.33 ± 8.55%, and for the 1 × 104 conidia/ml group, the mortality was 32.00 ± 7.24%. In the control group, the percent mortality was 3.00 ± 1.00%. According to the probit analysis, the LC50, LC90, and LC99 values at d 12 were 2.43 × 105 (2.07 × 105–2.79 × 105), 6.65 × 105 (5.79 × 105–7.52 × 105), and 1.01 × 106 (8.76 × 105–1.14 × 106) conidia/ml, respectively (Table 1).

Fig. 1.

Kaplan–Meier survival curve of Ae. albopictus (n = 300) exposed to different concentrations of B. bassiana. All curves show significantly altered survival probabilities due to exposure to different fungus concentrations (χ2 = 67.50, df = 3, P < 0.0001). Letters following the survival curves show significant pairwise comparison values (all P < 0.0001). Censored data are shown as crosses at the end of the curves.

img-z3-11_1687.jpg

Lethal Time For each tested concentration, the LT50 was calculated using probit analysis. At 1 × 108 conidia/ml, all larvae died before the first mortality check; therefore, no accurate measure could be calculated. At 1 × 107 conidia/ml, the LT50 was 1.05 (0.97–1.12) d. At 1 × 106 conidia/ml, the LT50 was 3.68 (3.54–3.81) d. At 1 × 105 conidia/ml, the LT50 was 11.85 (10.23–14.60) d, which was slightly longer than the length of time Ae. albopictus spend as larvae before pupation in a favorable environment. At 1 × 104 conidia/ml, the LT50 was 22.43 (19.32–27.14) d, exceeding the standard developmental time.

Oviposition Behavior

Egg Count by Concentration From 128 trapping events over six weeks, 1966 eggs were collected. The highest concentration of B. bassiana, 1 × 109 conidia/ml, resulted in the fewest total eggs (216 eggs (6.75 ± 2.78 eggs/paddle)). The concentration with the most eggs was 1 × 107 conidia/ml, with 627 eggs (19.59 ± 7.27 eggs/paddle). The lowest concentration, 1 × 105 conidia/ml, resulted in a total of 556 eggs (17.38 ± 5.51 eggs/paddle), and the control resulted in 567 eggs (17.72 ± 5.61 eggs/paddle). All reared mosquitoes were identified as Ae. albopictus.

The best performing negative binomial distribution GLM for the egg count predictions contained the factors of concentration of fungus and site (Table 2). There was a statistically significant decrease in the amount of eggs laid with increasing fungus concentrations (95% CI: (–2.03 × 10–9––2.13 × 10–10), P = 0.0104). The negative association indicated there was a deterring effect caused by the fungus to the mosquito when a gravid mosquito is scouting for oviposition locations. A likelihood ratio test between the best model and a null model resulted in significance demonstrating the concentration of fungus improved the model performance (χ2 = 5.403, df = 1, P = 0.0201). Significant site variations in the number of eggs were also determined by the model.

Presence/Absence of Eggs by Concentration The lowest percentage of paddles with eggs, 31.25% (10 out of 32) was associated with the highest concentration of fungus, 1 × 109 conidia/ml. At 1 × 107 conidia/ml, 50% (16 out of 32) of the paddles contained eggs. The lowest concentration, 1 × 105 conidia/ml, had the highest percentage of paddles with eggs among the three treatments, with 56.25% (18 out of 32) of paddles containing eggs. The control had the highest percentage of paddles with eggs, at 62.5% (20 out of 32).

The GLM model created to assess the effect of concentration of fungus and site location on the presence and absence of mosquito eggs determined the best fit model contained the fixed effects of concentration and site (Table 2). Results showed there was a significant decline in the likelihood of eggs with an increase in fungus concentrations (95% CI: (–2.20 × 10–9––3.30 × 10–10), P = 0.0092). The significant negative association between occurrence and concentration indicates selective behavior when determining an oviposition location. A likelihood ratio test resulted in a significant improvement with addition of fungus concentration (χ2 = 7.247, df = 1, P = 0.0071). Additionally, there were significant differences in egg presence between sites in the model.

Discussion

Larval survival was significantly altered by the concentration of B. bassiana. The LC50 values for second- and third-instar Ae. albopictus in the current study were similar to the median lethal concentrations calculated by de Luna-Santillana et al. (2020) at 7–8 d with 105–106 conidia/ml. The LC50 values calculated by Alcalde-Mosqueira et al. (2014) and Montoya-Treviño et al. (2008) were both higher than the current findings LC50 of 2.43 × 105 conidia/ml, as they reported LC50 values of 3.6 × 106 conidia/ml and 3.86 × 106 conidia/ml, respectively. These three previous studies examined the lethal concentrations for various strains of B. bassiana against third- and fourth-instar Ae. aegypti. The age of larvae at introduction of the fungus has been observed to determine susceptibility, with faster-growing species experiencing lower mortality attributable to fungal exposure (Clark et al. 1968, Scholte et al. 2004). The current experiment used both second- and third-instar larvae hatched at the same time, and the second instars may have survived exposure to a higher concentration due to molting soon after exposure to the fungus. Several environmentally sampled strains of B. bassiana have been shown to require higher concentrations of conidia to cause equivalent pathogenicity (Vivekanandhan et al. 2018, de Luna-Santillana et al. 2020). For example, B. bassiana sampled from southern Indian soils was used in a larval bioassay involving Ae. aegypti, and the results indicated an LT50 of 5.91 d and 78.66% mortality after 10 d of exposure to 1 × 108 conidia/ml (Vivekanandhan et al. 2020). These findings at 1 × 108 conidia/ml indicate lower pathogenicity than that in our experiment, in which all larvae died within 24 h.

Table 1.

Percent mortality of Ae. albopictus larvae exposed to different concentrations of B. bassiana at d 12 (n = 300)

img-z4-8_1687.gif

Table 2.

Best performing generalized linear models for ovipositional preferences

img-z4-11_1687.gif

A larval mortality trend was observed: there were two to three days with a high mortality rate, with the onset being staggered by concentration, followed by gradual mortality resulting in similar daily mortality percentages. This was observed for all three concentrations, 1 × 104, 1 × 105, and 1 × 106 conidia/ml, from d 7 to study conclusion (Fig. 1), diverging from the control group. There were no consecutive days in which the control exhibited a similar mortality range. The continued mortality after the large initial mortality event suggests lingering fungal effects on the larvae, potentially weakening the immune system and other vital pathways (Yassine et al. 2012, Ramirez et al. 2019, Shoukat et al. 2020).

The question of whether B. bassiana, secondary metabolites, or other factors were the cause of the rapid mortality observed in our experiment remains to be elucidated. Because Mycotrol ESO contains petroleum distillates, it is possible that the larval environment became coated in an impermeable layer of oils, causing the larvae to die due to suffocation as opposed to fungal exposure, although the addition of polysorbate 20 reduced this possibility. By subsampling dead larvae, fungal growth was visually confirmed; however, the rapid mortality observed at the two highest concentrations does not accommodate the generalized timeline of the fungus (Clark et al. 1968). Secondary metabolites have been isolated and shown to cause larval mortality in past experiments (Daniel et al. 2016, Vivekanandhan et al. 2018, Zhang et al. 2020). Both our research team and previous researchers observed melanization of larval siphons and midguts during experimental periods, which is part of the immune response to fungal infection (Clark et al. 1968, Yassine et al. 2012). Mechanical blockage of the tracheal trunks and larval siphon by the fungus has been suggested as one of the causes of larval mortality (Clark et al. 1968, Miranpuri and Khachatourians 1991, Daniel et al. 2016, Amobonye et al. 2020). We hypothesize that multiple insecticidal modes of action occurred, causing initial and sustained mortality.

Genetic engineering of B. bassiana has been proposed to increase the efficacy of the fungus in second instar Ae. albopictus through increased and quicker lethality (Deng et al. 2017, 2019a). These studies hypothesized that the integration of a single-chain neurotoxic polypeptide (AaIT) from the venom of the buthid scorpion (Androctonus australis) or a toxin expressed by Bacillus thuringiensis (Cyt2Ba) into the genome of B. bassiana will cause increased virulence and decrease the survival of Ae. albopictus (Deng et al. 2017, 2019a). The current experiment with B. bassiana strain GHA resulted in an LC50 of 2.43 × 105 conidia/ml at d 12, whereas the LC50 of the toxin-infused B. bassiana strain GIM3.428 was 1.47 × 103 conidia/ml at d 10, and the LC50 of a wild type of the same strain was 1.65 × 104 conidia/ml at d 10 (Deng et al. 2017). It would appear that the toxin-infused strain caused mortality at a lower concentration than the commonly used entomopathogenic strains. However, the B. bassiana strain GHA had a shorter LT50 of 1.05 d at 1 × 107 conidia/ml and 3.68 d at 1 × 106 conidia/ml compared to the Aa-IT toxin-infused strain, with an LT50 at 4.4 d and 5.5 d, respectively, and the Cyt2Ba toxin-infused strain, with an LT50 of 4.0 d and 5.5 d, respectively (Deng et al. 2017, 2019a). This can likely be attributed to Mycotrol ESO formula optimization as a pesticide.

When assessing whether adult behavior was altered by different concentrations of B. bassiana, we found that control paddles and paddles coated with 1 × 105 conidia/ml more commonly had eggs than paddles coated with 1 × 107 and 1 × 109 conidia/ml. Model results show a significant negative association between the presence of mosquito eggs and the concentration of B. bassiana. The declining percentage of paddles with eggs with increasing concentration may be explained by the fungus itself or the product formulation. The fungus-impregnated wooden substrate may have been a deterrent to gravid mosquitoes, as hyphae or product oils potentially made the paddle unfavorable for oviposition. Additionally, secondary metabolites produced by the fungus may cause a repulsive effect in Ae. albopictus. However, little is known about secondary metabolite interactions with mosquitoes, and a previous study speculated that secondary metabolites have minimal behavioral influences on mosquito oviposition preferences (Zhang et al. 2020).

Within the past ten years, research has routinely evaluated B. bassiana and other entomopathogenic fungi toxicity in adult mosquitoes and found high rates of mortality using different infection protocols (Darbro et al. 2012, Jaber et al. 2016, Buckner et al. 2017, Lee et al. 2019, de Luna-Santillana et al. 2020, Shoukat et al. 2020, Vivekanandhan et al. 2020). One experiment sprayed a 1 × 108 conidia/ml suspension of various isolates of B. bassiana into a cage with Ae. albopictus and found that multiple isolates had 100% adult mortality at 10 d, with an LT50 as low as 4.5 d for the most pathogenic strain (Lee et al. 2019). A different study used a concentration of 3 × 108 conidia/ml and found a mortality rate of 87.5% at seven d with an LC50 of 3 × 106 conidia/ml (Shoukat et al. 2020). The concentration of conidia transferred to an ovipositing mosquito is lower than the concentration examined in these studies, which is why our methods used a higher concentration of 1 × 109 conidia/ml. Future research can investigate attractive measures in low-cost oviposition traps to increase the likelihood of ovipositing and the number of eggs laid in the ovitrap, further increasing mycopesticide contact time and removing more vectors from the environment.

Using current trapping methods, many experiments have been successful in transferring conidia from traps to mosquitoes, resulting in mosquito mortality (Scholte et al. 2005, Farenhorst et al. 2008, Howard et al. 2010, Snetselaar et al. 2014, Buckner et al. 2017, Silva et al. 2018). These studies reported that mosquitoes are more attracted to dark colors, yeast-infused water, and synthetic lures than fungi (Snetselaar et al. 2014, Buckner et al. 2017, Paula et al. 2018, Silva et al. 2018). The fungus delivery system has varied widely in trials; passive methods included applying conidia to resting container walls and netting, and active methods in laboratory trials included applying conidia topically, injecting conidia into the thorax, and spraying conidia directly onto adults (Farenhorst et al. 2008, Howard et al. 2010, Mnyone et al. 2010, Johnson et al. 2019, Lee et al. 2019, Ramirez et al. 2019, Shoukat et al. 2020). Our study applied the mycopesticide formula to the substrate with a paintbrush for an even coating that dried on the wooden substrate. Two studies found no repellent effect between nets treated with the fungus and control nets by observing at the number of mosquitoes that traveled toward an odor cue through placed holes in fungus-impregnated netting (Howard et al. 2010, Mnyone et al. 2010). Conversely, George et al. (2013) performed an olfactory choice experiment in which fungus was placed at one end of the Y-tube and found that fungus was an attractant to Anopheles stephensi Liston. Using ovitraps and different formulation of B. bassiana, we demonstrated Ae. albopictus did not exhibit a similar response. The inconclusive body of literature necessitates further research on fungus-induced behavior modifications as well as different strains, formulations, and species of mosquitoes.

Aedes albopictus exhibits an ovipositional behavior known as “skip oviposition”, where one gravid female lays eggs from the same gonotrophic cycle in multiple larval habitats (Trexler et al. 1998, Reinbold-Wasson and Reiskind 2021). Thus, multiple eggs from the same gravid female may have been laid at multiple paddles in the same quad-ovitrap. If this occurred with the highest concentration of fungus habitat being selected against, or had a repulsive effect on the gravid mosquito, it would further support our observation that Ae. albopictus altered the number of eggs laid due to the presence of fungus. The two highest concentrations of fungus, 1 × 109 and 1 × 107 conidia/ml, were associated with lower medians and numbers of paddles with eggs than the control and 1 × 105 conidia/ml concentration, as would be predicted if there was a repellent effect, causing the gravid female to oviposit at a perceived better location without a high concentration of fungus and then move on to a different site. This may have been occurring during the experiment, as there was a higher likelihood of the presence of eggs on control paddles, indicating that control paddles and paddles with lower concentrations of B. bassiana were considered more attractive oviposition sites. Additionally, skip oviposition may also increase the likelihood of fungal transference to the mosquito, as increased contact time results in higher infectivity (de Paula et al. 2008).

One challenge in creating an effective fungus delivery system is the low tolerance of entomopathogenic fungi to sunlight. As fungi degrade quickly in UV light, the traps were placed in shaded and humid areas, which are also mosquito-favored habitats (Fargues et al. 1996, Zimmermann 2007, Dickens et al. 2018). Observations of the postcollection paddles showed sporulated fungal bodies, indicating successful application of the fungus. The current study shows that UV degradation can be minimized with attention to trap placement, aided by temperatures that allow for fungus survival.

Conclusions

This study was conducted to ascertain the integration feasibility of two existing vector management strategies, entomopathogenic fungi and ovitraps. The results showed larvicidal activity of B. bassiana at concentrations at or higher than 1 × 106 conidia/ml against second- and third-instar Ae. albopictus. We also demonstrated that gravid Ae. albopictus laid fewer eggs on wooden paddles with higher concentrations of B. bassiana and the likelihood of egg laying decreased with increasing fungal concentrations. By using a precise concentration of entomopathogenic fungi, infectivity and pathogenicity can be optimized for control measures without sacrificing the number of mosquitoes infected. The use of B. bassiana can be integrated with existing integrated vector management strategies to better control vectors and to minimize the spread of insecticide resistance in mosquito populations.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary data are available at Journal of Medical Entomology online.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express gratitude to S.-X. Cheah for his review and comments. The work reported here constitutes part of the M.S. thesis of J.M.K. who was partially supported under the new faculty start-up fund (to J.-W.T.), and Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources (to J.-W.T.) (Grant number: T-21-522).

References Cited

1.

Achee, N. L., J. P. Grieco, H. Vatandoost, G. Seixas, J. Pinto, L. Ching-NG, A. J. Martins, W. Juntarajumnong, V. Corbel, C. Gouagna , et al. 2019. Alternative strategies for mosquito-borne arbovirus control. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 13: e0006822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006822 Google Scholar

2.

Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle, pp. 267–281. In B. N. Petran and F. Csaki (eds.), Second International Symposium on Information Theory. 2–8 September 1971. Akaemiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary. Google Scholar

3.

Alcalde-Mosqueira, J. G., J. E. Roldán-Rodríguez, V. del, P. Saravia-Cueva, and L. Collantes-Silva. 2014. Efecto biocida de diferentes concentraciones deMetarhizium anisopliae CCB-LE302 y Beauveria bassiana CCB-LE265 sobre larvas III de Aedes aegypti. UCV-Sci. 6: 33–41. Google Scholar

4.

Amobonye, A., P. Bhagwat, A. Pandey, S. Singh, and S. Pillai. 2020. Biotechnological potential of Beauveria bassiana as a source of novel biocatalysts and metabolites. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 40: 1019–1034. Google Scholar

5.

Arthurs, S., and S. K. Dara. 2019. Microbial biopesticides for invertebrate pests and their markets in the United States. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 165: 13–21. Google Scholar

6.

Bolker, B. and R Development Core Team. 2020. bbmle: tools for general maximum likelihood estimation. R package version 1.0.23.1.  https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=bbmle  Google Scholar

7.

Buckner, E. A., K. F. Williams, A. L. Marsicano, M. D. Latham, and C. R. Lesser. 2017. Evaluating the vector control potential of the In2Care® mosquito trap against Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus under semifield conditions in Manatee County, Florida. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 33: 193–199. Google Scholar

8.

Clark, T. B., W. R. Kellen, T. Fukuda, and J. E. Lindegren. 1968. Field and laboratory studies on the pathogenicity of the fungus Beauveria bassiana to three genera of mosquitoes. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 11: 1–7. Google Scholar

9.

Daniel, J., A. Silva, D. Nakagawa, L. de Medeiros, M. Carvalho, L. Tavares, L. Abreu, and E. Rodrigues-Filho. 2016. Larvicidal activity of Beauveria bassiana extracts against Aedes aegypti and identification of beauvericins. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 28: 1003–1013. Google Scholar

10.

Darbro, J. M., S. A. Ritchie, M. B. Thomas, P. H. Johnson, P. A. Ryan, and B. H. Kay. 2012. Effects of Beauveria bassiana on survival, blood-feeding success, and fecundity of Aedes aegypti in laboratory and semi-field conditions. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 86: 656–664. Google Scholar

11.

Darsie, R. F., and R. A. Ward. 2016. Identification and geographical distribution of the mosquitoes of North America, North of Mexico. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL. Google Scholar

12.

de Luna-Santillana, E. J., I. Q. Zapata, M. E. Alemán-Huerta, N. Arroyo-González, and F. L. Gandarilla-Pacheco. 2020. Selection of native Mexican strains of Beauveria bassiana with larvicidal potential against Aedes aegypti. Southwest. Entomol. 45: 415–424. Google Scholar

13.

de Paula, A. R., E. S. Brito, C. R. Pereira, M. P. Carrera, and R. I. Samuels. 2008. Susceptibility of adult Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) to infection by Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana: prospects for Dengue vector control. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 18: 1017–1025. Google Scholar

14.

Deng, S. -Q., Q. -D. Cai, M. -Z. Deng, Q. Huang, and H. -J. Peng. 2017. Scorpion neurotoxin AaIT-expressing Beauveria bassiana enhances the virulence against Aedes albopictus mosquitoes. AMB Express 7: 121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-017-0422-1 Google Scholar

15.

Deng, S. -Q., W. -H. Zou, D. -L. Li, J. -T. Chen, Q. Huang, L. -J. Zhou, X. -X. Tian, Y. -J. Chen, and H. -J. Peng. 2019a. Expression of Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cyt2Ba in the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana increases its virulence towards Aedes mosquitoes. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 13: e0007590. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007590 Google Scholar

16.

Deng, S., Q. Huang, H. Wei, L. Zhou, L. Yao, D. Li, S. Wu, J. Chen, and H. Peng. 2019b. Beauveria bassiana infection reduces the vectorial capacity of Aedes albopictus for the Zika virus. J. Pest Sci. 92: 781–789. Google Scholar

17.

Dickens, B. L., H. Sun, M. Jit, A. R. Cook, and L. R. Carrasco. 2018. Determining environmental and anthropogenic factors which explain the global distribution of Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus. BMJ Glob. Health 3: e000801. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000801 Google Scholar

18.

Dong, Y., J. C. Morton, J. L. Ramirez, J. A. Souza-Neto, and G. Dimopoulos. 2012. The entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana activate Toll and JAK-STAT pathway controlled effector genes and anti-dengue activity in Aedes aegypti. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 42: 126–132. Google Scholar

19.

Farenhorst, M., D. Farina, E. -J. Scholte, W. Takken, R. H. Hunt, M. Coetzee, and B. G. J. Knols. 2008. African water storage pots for the delivery of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae to the malaria vectors Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles funestus. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 78: 910–916. Google Scholar

20.

Fargues, J., M. S. Goettel, N. Smits, A. Ouedraogo, C. Vidal, L. A. Lacey, C. J. Lomer, and M. Rougier. 1996. Variability in susceptibility to simulated sunlight of conidia among isolates of entomopathogenic Hyphomycetes. Mycopathologia 135: 171–181. Google Scholar

21.

George, J., N. E. Jenkins, S. Blanford, M. B. Thomas, and T. C. Baker. 2013. Malaria mosquitoes attracted by fatal fungus. PLoS ONE. 8: e62632. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062632 Google Scholar

22.

Hlina, B. L. 2021. ecotox: Analysis of Ecotoxicology. R package version 1.4.2.  https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ecotox  Google Scholar

23.

Howard, A. F., R. N'Guessan, C. J. Koenraadt, A. Asidi, M. Farenhorst, M. Akogbéto, M. B. Thomas, B. G. Knols, and W. Takken. 2010. The entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana reduces instantaneous blood feeding in wild multi-insecticide-resistant Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes in Benin, West Africa. Parasit. Vectors 3: 87. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-3-87 Google Scholar

24.

Jaber, S., A. Mercier, K. Knio, S. Brun, and Z. Kambris. 2016. Isolation of fungi from dead arthropods and identification of a new mosquito natural pathogen. Parasit. Vectors 9: 491. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1763-3 Google Scholar

25.

Johnson, D. M., E. N. I. Weeks, E. D. LoVullo, P. D. Shirk, and C. J. Geden. 2019. Mortality effects of three bacterial pathogens and Beauveria bassiana when topically applied or injected into house flies (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Med. Entomol. 56: 774–783. Google Scholar

26.

Lee, J. Y., R. M. Woo, C. J. Choi, T. Y. Shin, W. S. Gwak, and S. D. Woo. 2019. Beauveria bassiana for the simultaneous control of Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens mosquito adults shows high conidia persistence and productivity. AMB Express 9: 206. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0933-z Google Scholar

27.

Litwin, A., M. Nowak, and S. Różalska. 2020. Entomopathogenic fungi: unconventional applications. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 19: 23–42. Google Scholar

28.

Lowe, S., M. Browne, S. Boudjelas, and M. De Poorter. 2004. 100 of the world's worst invasive alien species: a selection from the global invasive species database. Aliens. Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) a specialist group of the Species Survival Commission (SSC) of the World Conservation Union (IUCN). Hollands Printing Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand. Google Scholar

29.

Mascarin, G. M., R. B. Lopes, I. Delalibera, K. K. Fernandes, C. Luz, and M. Faria. 2019. Current status and perspectives of fungal entomopathogens used for microbial control of arthropod pests in Brazil. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 165: 46–53. Google Scholar

30.

Miranpuri, G. S., and G. G. Khachatourians. 1991. Infection sites of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana in the larvae of the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 59: 19–27. Google Scholar

31.

Mnyone, L. L., C. J. Koenraadt, I. N. Lyimo, M. W. Mpingwa, W. Takken, and T. L. Russell. 2010. Anopheline and culicine mosquitoes are not repelled by surfaces treated with the entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana. Parasit. Vectors 3: 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-3-80 Google Scholar

32.

Montoya-Treviño, S., M. G. Maldonado-Blanco, L. J. Galán-Wong, M. Elías-Santos, and A. Espinoza-Mata. 2008. Evaluation of Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana for control to Aedes aegypti larvae in laboratory. Rev. Entomol. Mex 2008: 775–778. Google Scholar

33.

Moutailler, S., M. Bouloy, and A. -B. Failloux. 2007. Short report: efficient oral infection of Culex pipiens quinquefasciatusby Rift Valley fever virus using a cotton stick support. Am. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 76: 827–829. Google Scholar

34.

Moyes, C. L., J. Vontas, A. J. Martins, L. C. Ng, S. Y. Koou, I. Dusfour, K. Raghavendra, J. Pinto, V. Corbel, and J. -P. David . et al. 2017. Contemporary status of insecticide resistance in the major Aedes vectors of arboviruses infecting humans. PLoS Negl.Trop. Dis. 11: e0005625. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005625 Google Scholar

35.

Paula, A. R., L. E. I. Silva, A. Ribeiro, T. M. Butt, C. P. Silva, and R. I. Samuels. 2018. Improving the delivery and efficiency of fungus-impregnated cloths for control of adult Aedes aegypti using a synthetic attractive lure. Parasit. Vectors 11: 285. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2871-z Google Scholar

36.

Paupy, C., H. Delatte, L. Bagny, V. Corbel, and D. Fontenille. 2009. Aedes albopictus, an arbovirus vector: from the darkness to the light. Microbes Infect. 11: 1177–1185. Google Scholar

37.

R Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.  http://www.Rproject.org/  Google Scholar

38.

Ramirez, J. L., E. J. Muturi, A. B. F. Barletta, and A. P. Rooney. 2019. The Aedes aegypti IMD pathway is a critical component of the mosquito antifungal immune response. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 95: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2018.12.010 Google Scholar

39.

Reinbold-Wasson, D. D., and M. H. Reiskind. 2021. Comparative skip-oviposition behavior among container breeding Aedes spp. mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 58: 2091–2100. Google Scholar

40.

Scholte, E. -J., B. G. J. Knols, R. A. Samson, and W. Takken. 2004. Entomopathogenic fungi for mosquito control: a review. J. Insect Sci. 4: 1–24. Google Scholar

41.

Scholte, E. -J., K. Ng'habi, J. Kihonda, W. Takken, K. Paaijmans, S. Abdulla, G. F. Killeen, and B. G. Knols. 2005. An entomopathogenic fungus for control of adult African malaria mosquitoes. Science 308: 1641–1642. Google Scholar

42.

Shoukat, R. F., J. Zafar, M. Shakeel, Y. Zhang, S. Freed, X. Xu, and F. Jin. 2020. Assessment of lethal, sublethal, and transgenerational effects of Beauveria bassiana on the demography of Aedes albopictus (Culicidae: Diptera). Insects 11: 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11030178 Google Scholar

43.

Silva, L. E. I., A. R. Paula, A. Ribeiro, T. M. Butt, C. P. Silva, and R. I. Samuels. 2018. A new method of deploying entomopathogenic fungi to control adult Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. J. Appl. Entomol. 142: 59–66. Google Scholar

44.

Snetselaar, J., R. Andriessen, R. A. Suer, A. J. Osinga, B. G. Knols, and M. Farenhorst. 2014. Development and evaluation of a novel contamination device that targets multiple life-stages of Aedes aegypti. Parasit. Vectors 7: 200. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-200 Google Scholar

45.

Su, T., P. Mullens, J. Thieme, A. Melgoza, R. Real, and M. Q. Brown. 2020. Deployment and fact analysis of the In2Care mosquito trap, a novel tool for controlling invasive Aedes species. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 36: 167–174. Google Scholar

46.

Therneau, T. 2021. A Package for Survival Analysis in R. R package version 3.2-13.  https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival  Google Scholar

47.

Trexler, J. D., C. S. Apperson, and C. Schal. 1998. Laboratory and field evaluations of oviposition responses of Aedes albopictus and Aedes triseriatus (Diptera: Culicidae) to oak leaf infusions. J. Med. Entomol. 35: 967–976. Google Scholar

48.

UH Mānoa Atmospheric Sciences. 2021. University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Department of Atmospheric Sciences. UH Mānoa atmospheric sciences weather data, Honolulu, Hawai’i.  https://uhmmeteorology.westernweathergroup.com/  Google Scholar

49.

(USGS) United States Geological Survey. 2021. The National Map. Data refreshed August, 2021. URL:  https://apps.nationalmap.gov/viewer/  Google Scholar

50.

Venables, W. N. and Ripley, B. D. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. Fourth Edition. Springer, New York. ISBN 0-387-95457-0. URL:  https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MASS/  Google Scholar

51.

Vivekanandhan, P., T. Kavitha, S. Karthi, S. Senthil-Nathan, and M. Shivakumar. 2018. Toxicity of Beauveria bassiana-28 mycelial extracts on larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15: 440. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030440 Google Scholar

52.

Vivekanandhan, P., S. Bedini, and M. S. Shivakumar. 2020. Isolation and identification of entomopathogenic fungus from Eastern Ghats of South Indian forest soil and their efficacy as biopesticide for mosquito control. Parasitol. Int. 76: 102099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2020.102099 Google Scholar

53.

WHO. 2005. World Health Organization. Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicides, Geneva, Switzerland. Available from  https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/69101 . Accessed September 2020. Google Scholar

54.

WHO. 2017. World Health Organization. Global vector control response 2017-2030, Geneva, Switzerland. Available from  https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241512978 . Accessed November 2020. Google Scholar

55.

Wilson, A. L., O. Courtenay, L. A. Kelly-Hope, T. W. Scott, W. Takken, S. J. Torr, and S. W. Lindsay. 2020. The importance of vector control for the control and elimination of vector-borne diseases. PLoS Negl.Trop. Dis. 14: e0007831. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007831 Google Scholar

56.

Yassine, H., L. Kamareddine, and M. A. Osta. 2012. The mosquito melanization response is implicated in defense against the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. PLoS Pathog. 8: e1003029. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003029 Google Scholar

57.

Zhang, L., O. E. Fasoyin, I. Molnár, and Y. Xu. 2020. Secondary metabolites from hypocrealean entomopathogenic fungi: novel bioactive compounds. Nat. Prod. Rep. 37: 1181–1206. Google Scholar

58.

Zimmermann, G. 2007. Review on safety of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Beauveria brongniartii. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 17: 553–596. Google Scholar
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.
John M. Kirsch and Jia-Wei Tay "Larval Mortality and Ovipositional Preference in Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) Induced by the Entomopathogenic Fungus Beauveria bassiana (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae)," Journal of Medical Entomology 59(5), 1687-1693, (21 September 2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjac084
Received: 15 March 2022; Accepted: 1 June 2022; Published: 21 September 2022
KEYWORDS
biological control
entomopathogenic fungi
larvae bioassay
oviposition
ovitrap
Back to Top