Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2008 Variation in body size among populations of the bushcricket Poecilimon thessalicus (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae): an ecological adaptation
Gerlind U. C. Lehmann, Arne W. Lehmann
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We analyzed geographical variation in body size in males and females of nine Greek populations of the bushcricket Poecilimon thessalicus Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1891. We found significant geographic variability in P. thessalicus, with all three morphometric body-size characters (hind femur, front tibia, and pronotum) highly correlated within populations. Populations differed in mean size between three mountain ranges, and were larger on moist eastern, than on dry western slopes. We suggest that the observed smaller size of the bushcrickets on western slopes is mainly the consequence of a shorter growing season due to summer drying on western slopes. Sex-specific growth rates might contribute to the observed smaller body size in males in all populations. Rensch's rule that sexual size dimorphism (SSD) decreases as body size increases is supported, with males growing relatively larger compared to females in populations with larger body sizes. This pattern might be sexually selected, as males that produce larger nuptial gifts are favored as mates in Poecilimon bushcrickets.

Introduction

Body size in animals influences many traits, such as competitiveness, dispersal ability, number and size of offspring and longevity. This is why fitness is often highly correlated with body size (Peters 1983, Stearns 1992, Honek 1999, Roff 2002). Geographic variation in size is common in animals, with conspecific populations often showing considerable differences in adult body size (Atkinson 1994). Explanations for this variation include both proximal (developmental) and ultimate (evolutionary) reasons, including differences in climate, resource quality and availability, size-specific predation, social factors such as population density and competition, character displacement, sexual selection and clinal variation in development rate (Berven & Gill 1983, Peters 1983, Petraitis et al. 2001, Sandland & Minchella 2004).

During development, body size is affected by any number of environmental factors, including disease, parasites, toxins, and nutrition (Ikeya et al. 2002, Davidowitz et al. 2004), with dietary restrictions generally causing smaller body size. Temperature also affects body size, and higher temperatures generally result in the development of smaller animals (Atkinson & Sibly 1997, Davidowitz & Nijhout 2004).

On an evolutionary scale, populations can respond to local selection on body size. One commonly observed intraspecific clinal pattern in body size for mammals is an increase in size with latitude, known as Bergmann's rule. However, many invertebrates show trends consistent with the converse of Bergmann's rule, whereby body size is smaller in populations at higher latitudes and altitudes (Masaki 1967, Mousseau & Roff 1989, Blanckenhorn & Fairbairn 1995, Blanckenhorn & Hellriegel 2002). Nevertheless, patterns consistent or inconsistent with Bergmann's rule are not mutually exclusive since they can be affected by different environmental causes (temperature and season length, respectively) and have different underlying mechanisms (Blanckenhorn & Demont 2004).

The optimal size (and age) at maturity is a frequently studied topic in life history theory and it is based on the assumption of a fundamental trade-off between the benefits of a large body size and the costs of a consequently long juvenile period (Stearns 1992, Roff 2002, Kingsolver et al. 2004). Presumably, individuals can become larger (and thus increase fecundity) by lengthening the growth period. However, such individuals suffer a cost in that they may die before reproducing. In contrast, an individual can rush through its development in order to rapidly reach adulthood and reproduce, but at a lower body size and fecundity. Which of these strategies evolves should depend on daily mortality rates and length of growing season (Masaki 1967; Roff 1980; Gotthard 2001, 2004; Blanckenhorn & Demont 2004). We would expect rapid development and small adult size under short growing seasons and high daily mortality rates. Thus, characterizing lengths of growing seasons is an important factor when explaining size variation among animal populations.

In addition to natural selection on body size, there can also be sexual selection on size. This selection can be sex specific, and result in different sizes in males vs females: sexual size dimorphism (SSD). For example, when the earliest maturing males fertilize more eggs, then there should be selection for fast development in males (protandry), possibly resulting in smaller male size. When males fight for possession of females, then there should be strong selection for large male size. In contrast, when males choose females based on large size, then large females should be selected. In orthopterans, male and female size often varies differently among geographic populations, in acridids (Roff & Mousseau 2005, Berner & Blanckenhorn 2006, Bidau & Martí 2007), gryllids (Masaki 1967, Mousseau & Roff 1989, 1995) and bushcrickets (katydids) (Landman et al. 1989). This variability in SSD may be a consequence of differential natural and sexual selection on the two sexes. Rensch's rule states that SSD should decrease as overall body size increases, and is a macroecological pattern that has been observed in a wide range of species (Fairbairn 1997, Blanckenhorn et al. 2007).

The Poecilimon propinquus group (Lehmann AW 1998, Lehmann AW et al. 2006) of bushcrickets (katydids) form an interesting clade, because they exhibit interspecific, intraspecific, and sexual size variation, and have served as model organisms in various evolutionary studies (e.g., Heller 1997, Lehmann AW 1998, Lehmann GUC 1998). Phenologically, all Poecilimon are typical spring species, with a remarkable earlier appearance than most other bushcrickets, and an adult season lasting for around four weeks (e.g., Lehmann & Lehmann 2006). All members of the P. propinquus group are nocturnal (Heller & von Helversen 1993). In Poecilimon veluchianus, the discovery of remarkably smaller-sized individuals in some populations led to the description of a separate subspecies (Heller & Reinhold 1993). Subspecies crossing revealed a genetic basis for body size parameters and male fertility (Reinhold 1994), leading to differences in the mating effort of males (Heller & Reinhold 1994). In contrast to P. veluchianus, body-size variation has been little studied in Poecilimon thessalicus Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1891 (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae), a medium-sized flightless bushcricket approximately two centimeters in length (Lehmann et al. 2001). This univoltine species has an obligatory egg diapause and six nymphal stages in both sexes (unpub. data).

The present study addresses the geographic distribution of body size in populations of P. thessalicus. This species is distributed nearly continuously over the mountain ranges in the eastern mainland of Greece (Lehmann AW 1998), and shows extensive size variation between populations. We propose a correlation between body size and ecological parameters in these populations. Specifically, we hypothesize that smaller-sized individuals will exist in areas with shorter growing seasons, because a shorter growing season should select for earlier maturation and smaller body size. We also hypothesize that this species will follow Rensch's rule, which predicts lowered SSD in populations with larger overall body size.

Methods

We collected adult male and female P. thessalicus bushcrickets (katydids) from nine localities throughout the species' geographic range in three mountain ranges: Piería, Olymp and Ossa, in eastern Greece (Table 1). We used Mitutoyo calipers (accuracy 0.01 mm) to measure three morphometric external characters in live individuals: the length of the right hind femur, length of the right front tibia and the mid-dorsal length of the pronotum.

Table 1.

Geographic data for the nine populations of P. thessalicus used for body-size analysis.

i1082-6467-17-2-165-t01.gif

Results

Body size varied widely between populations of P. thessalicus (Table 2). The smallest and largest female individuals showed hind-femur lengths of 15.0 mm and 18.3 mm, respectively, while hind-femur length for individual males ranged from 13.0 mm to 17.7 mm. We found a significant difference between populations for mean hind-femur length (two-way ANOVA: factor population: F6,266= 32.28, P<0.001), pronotum (F6,218= 12.54, P<0.001) and front tibia (F6,218= 35.69, P<0.001). Additionally, a strong positive correlation between the three body parameters was apparent (pronotum vs femur length: ypron = 0.25xfem + 2.01, R2 = 0.66, n= 230, P<0.001; tibia vs femur length: ytib = 0.34xfem + 1.22, R2 = 0.80, n=230, P<0.001), and pronotum vs tibia length: ypron = 0.63tib + 1.73, R2 = 0.62, n= 232, P<0.001). Females were larger than males in all three body parameters (two-way ANOVA: factor sex: F1,266;218;218=333.72; 44.67; 69.71, P<0.001).

Table 2.

Means and standard errors of three morphometric characters in nine populations of P. thessalicus. We measured the length of the hind femur, the front tibia, and the pronotum, in mm, for live males and females separately. The data are sorted geographically from North to South.

i1082-6467-17-2-165-t02.gif

Male and female femur sizes correlated strongly within populations (ymfl = 1.24xffl −5.34, R2= 0.80, P< 0.001) (Fig. 1). An allometric analysis on log-transformed data confirmed a relative increase in male, compared to female, femur length, with an allometric slope of b = 1.34, indicating that in populations with larger individuals, sexual size dimorphism is less pronounced.

Fig. 1.

Correlation between population means of male and female hind-femur lengths, for nine populations of P. thessalicus from eastern Greece.

i1082-6467-17-2-165-f01.gif

Geographical location had a significant influence on body size (Fig. 2). A two-way analysis of variance revealed that males from the Piería mountain range were smaller than those from the Olymp or the Ossa mountain range (F2,192= 27.53, P<0.001). In addition, males on the western side of all the mountains were smaller than those on the eastern sides (F2,192= 27.53, P<0.001, see black symbols in Fig. 2). Body-size differences between western and eastern populations were greatest in the Olymp, and smallest in the Piería, mountain range.

Fig. 2.

Population means (± SD) of male hind femur length, sorted from north to south. Black symbols represent populations on the western slopes of the three mountain ranges.

i1082-6467-17-2-165-f02.gif

Discussion

P. thessalicus exhibited reasonably large body-size variation between populations (Fig. 2). In ectothermic species several geographic body-size patterns have been found. In many species these patterns follow altitudinal or latitudinal clines (Blanckenhorn & Demont 2004, Chown & Klok 2003). This is also true for orthopterans, where several studies reported a reduction of body size with altitude (Berner & Blanckenhorn 2006, Landman et al. 1989), latitude ( Bidau & Martí 2007, Masaki 1967, Mousseau & Roff 1989) or both (Roff & Mousseau 2005). However, the generality of this clinal rule has been questioned. Blanckenhorn & Demont (2004) list 46 insect species belonging to 11 orders and found 37% followed Bergmann's rule (with larger individuals occurring in cooler climates), while 63% exhibited the converse pattern. They suggested that these two clinal patterns might be part of a continuum of adaptive responses to ambient temperature or length of growing season. These different effects might be jointly operating to produce a variety of clines (Blanckenhorn & Demont 2004). Any change in temperature, nutrition, or pathogens with geography might itself be the agent causing variation, because these factors can strongly influence growth patterns and ultimate body size (Atkinson 1994, Angilletta & Dunham 2003).

In P. thessalicus, geography is likely to be an indicator variable of some other factor that directly exerts a selective pressure on the populations. The only obvious geographic pattern we found to have a significant influence on body size between populations was whether the populations lived on the western or eastern slopes of the three mountain ranges. It is possible that there are climate differences between western and eastern slopes, especially in terms of precipitation and length of growing season.

Seasonality can also be a determinant of body-size variation (Chown & Gaston 1999, Chown & Klok 2003). In univoltine insects, such as P. thessalicus, the length of the growing season represents a powerful limiting factor (Masaki 1967, Roff 1980). Short-season climates can constrain growth and development (Chown & Klok 2003) and so produce smaller body sizes. The length of the insect growing season is generally thought to correlate with ambient temperatures, with longer seasons at lower altitudes and latitudes (Masaki 1967).

Greece has a Mediterranean climate, whereby lack of summer rain turns the vegetation dry and brown in mid to late summer. Observed body-size variation in P. thessalicus may, therefore, result from climatic selection on the duration of the nymphal stages. Larger adults would develop in more suitable habitats where there is, for instance, longer-lasting nutritious vegetation (Masaki 1967, 1978; Roff 1980; Blanckenhorn & Demont 2004). Phenotypic differences among populations presumably have a strong genetic component (Masaki 1967, 1978; Roff 1980; Blanckenhorn & Fairbairn 1995; Blanckenhorn & Demont 2004). Indeed, in P. veluchianus, crossings between populations with distinct body sizes clearly revealed the genetic base for body-size differences (Reinhold 1994).

Sexual size dimorphism.—Male and female animals are rarely the same size, and the selective processes that create sexual size dimorphism (SSD) are controversial (Andersson 1994). Sexual selection often favors males with larger body size (Blanckenhorn et al. 1999, Fairbain & Preziosi 1994, Kraushaar & Blanckenhorn 2002). The difference in size between the sexes of a given species will then be a result of differential selection on the sexes, and the balance between selection pressures and constraints. Male bushcrickets transfer very large nuptial gifts during mating. Such gifts can account for around 30 percent of male body weight in P. thessalicus (McCartney et al. this issue, p. 231). Females of P. zimmeri preferentially mate with heavier males (Lehmann & Lehmann 2008), and these males produce heavier spermatophores (Lehmann & Lehmann in press), suggesting that sexual selection has a strong influence in this species.

Females of P. thessalicus are larger than males in all populations studied, but SSD decreases as female body size in P. thessalicus increases, following Rensch's rule. SSD could be explained — either by equal growth rates but different ages of maturation between males and females — or as the result of differences in growth rates between the sexes. However, Blanckenhorn and coworkers (2007) found only a weak positive relationship between SSD and developmental time for arthropods in general. They suggest that growth-rate differences between the sexes are more important than development-time differences in a wide range of arthropod taxa. Assuming equal growth rates of males and females, SSD would be mediated by sexual differences in development times, with the larger sex developing for a proportionately longer time. Males develop faster than females in a wide range of arthropods, including butterflies (Wicklund & Fagerström 1977, Wicklund & Forsberg 1991), spiders (Maklakov et al. 2004, Uhl et al. 2004), acridids (Berner & Blanckenhorn 2006) and bushcrickets (Wedell 1992, Simmons et al. 1994). Indeed, protandry is common in members of the P. propinquus-group, including P. thessalicus, in both the lab and the field, with males generally maturing three days before females (unpub. data).

In conclusion, we found significant variation in body size among populations of P. thessalicus. We speculate that this represents an ecologically selected growth adaptation, whereby smaller body size is selected for by the need for rapid development in a highly seasonal Mediterranean climate, which can produce poor food conditions because of summer drying of food plants. Additionally, P. thessalicus follows Rensch's rule, with males growing relatively larger compared to females in populations with larger body sizes.

Acknowledgments

We thank Robert Hickson and an anonymous referee for discussion of the manuscript.

References

1.

M. Andersson 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press. Princeton. Google Scholar

2.

M. J. Angilletta and A. E. Dunham . 2003. The temperature-size rule in ectotherms: simple evolutionary explanations may not be general. The American Naturalist 162:332–342. Google Scholar

3.

D. Atkinson 1994. Temperature and organism size—a biological law for ectotherms. Advances in Ecological Research 25:1–58. Google Scholar

4.

D. Atkinson and R. M. Sibly . 1997. Why are organisms usually bigger in colder environments? Making sense of a life history puzzle. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12:235–239. Google Scholar

5.

D. Berner and W. U. Blanckenhorn . 2006. Grasshopper ontogeny in relation to time constraints: adaptive divergence and stasis. Journal of Animal Ecology 75:130–139. Google Scholar

6.

K. A. Berven and D. E. Gill . 1983. Interpreting geographic variation in life history traits. American Zoologist 23:85–97. Google Scholar

7.

C. J. Bidau and D. A. Martí . 2007. Dichroplus vittatus (Orthoptera: Acrididae) follows the converse to Bergmann's rule although male morphological variability increases with latitude. Bulletin of Entomological Research 97:69–79. Google Scholar

8.

W. U. Blanckenhorn and M. Demont . 2004. Bergmann and converse Bergmann latitudinal clines in arthropods: two ends of a continuum. Integrative Comparative Biology 44:413–424. Google Scholar

9.

W. U. Blanckenhorn and D. J. Fairbairn . 1995. Life history adaptation along a latitudinal cline in water striders. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 8:21–41. Google Scholar

10.

W. U. Blanckenhorn and B. Hellriegel . 2002. Against Bergmann's rule: fly sperm size increases with temperature. Ecological Letters 5:7–10. Google Scholar

11.

W. U. Blanckenhorn, C. Morf, C. Mühlhäuser, and T. Reusch . 1999. Spatiotemporal variation in selection on body size in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12:563–576. Google Scholar

12.

W. U. Blanckenhorn, A. F. G. Dixon, D. J. Fairbairn, M. W. Foellmer, P. Gibert, K. van der Linde, R. Meier, S. Nylin, S. Pitnick, C. Schoff, M. Signorelli, T. Teder, and C. Wiklund . 2007. Proximate causes of Rensch's rule: does sexual size dimorphism in arthropods result from sex differences in development time. The American Naturalist 169:245–257. Google Scholar

13.

S. L. Chown and K. J. Gaston . 1999. Exploring links between physiology and ecology at macro-scales: the role of respiratory metabolism in insects. Biological Reviews 74:87–120. Google Scholar

14.

S. L. Chown and C. J. Klok . 2003. Altitudinal body size clines: latitudinal effects associated with changing seasonality. Ecography 26:445–455. Google Scholar

15.

G. Davidowitz and H. F. Nijhout . 2004. The physiological basis of reaction norms: the interaction among growth rate, duration of growth and body size. Integrative Comparative Biology 44:443–449. Google Scholar

16.

G. Davidowitz, L. J. D'Amico, and H. F. Nijhout . 2004. The effects of environmental variation on a mechanism that controls insect body size. Evolutionary Ecology Research 6:49–62. Google Scholar

17.

D. J. Fairbairn 1997. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28:659–687. Google Scholar

18.

D. J. Fairbairn and R. F. Preziosi . 1994. Sexual selection and the evolution of allometry for sexual size dimorphism in the water strider, Aquarius remigis. American Naturalist 144:101–118. Google Scholar

19.

K. Gotthard 2001. Growth strategies of ectothermic animals in temperate environments. pp 287–304. In D. Atkinson and M. Thorndyke , editors. (Eds). Environment and Animal Development BIOS Scientific Publishers. Google Scholar

20.

K. Gotthard 2004. Growth strategies and optimal body size in temperate Pararginii butterflies. Integrative Comparative Biology 44:471–479. Google Scholar

21.

K-G. Heller 1997. Geld oder Leben - die unterschiedlichen Kosten des Gesangs bei Laubheuschrecken. Jahrbuch der Akademie der Wissenschaften Göttingen 1997:132–152. Google Scholar

22.

K-G. Heller and K. Reinhold . 1993. A new subspecies of Poecilimon veluchianus Ramme, 1933 (Tettigonioidea, Phaneropteridae) from Greece. Articulata 8:23–29. Google Scholar

23.

K-G. Heller and K. Reinhold . 1994. Mating effort function of the spermatophore in the bushcricket Poecilimon veluchianus (Orthoptera, Phaneropteridae): support from a comparison of the mating behaviour of two subspecies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society of London 53:153–163. Google Scholar

24.

K-G. Heller and D. von Helversen . 1993. Calling behavior in bushcrickets of the genus Poecilimon with differing communication systems (Orthoptera: Tettigonioidea, Phaneropteridae). Journal of Insect Behavior 6:361–377. Google Scholar

25.

A. Honek 1993. Intraspecific variation in body size in insects: a general relationship. Oikos 66:483–492. Google Scholar

26.

T. Ikeya, M. Galic, P. Belawat, K. Nairz, and E. Hafen . 2002. Nutrient dependent expression of insulin-like peptides from neuroendocrine cells in the CNS contributes to growth regulation in Drosophila. Current Biology 12:1293–1300. Google Scholar

27.

J. G. Kingsolver, R. Izem, and G. J. Ragland . 2004. Plasticity of size and growth in fluctuating thermal environments: Comparing reaction norms and performance curves. Integrative Comparative Biology 44:450–460. Google Scholar

28.

U. Kraushaar and W. U. Blanckenhorn . 2002. Population variation in sexual selection and its effect on size allometry in two dung fly species with contrasting sexual dimorphism. Evolution 56:307–321. Google Scholar

29.

W. Landman, L. Oudman, and M. Duijm . 1989. Allozymic and morphological variation in Ephippiger terrestris (Yersin, 1854) (Insecta, Orthoptera, Tettigonioidea). Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 132:183–198. Google Scholar

30.

A. W. Lehmann 1998. Artbildung, akustische Kommunikation und sexuelle Selektion bei griechischen Laubheuschrecken der Poecilimon propinquus-Gruppe (Tettigonioidea, Phaneropteridae). PhD Thesis. University Erlangen-Nürnberg. 134. pp. Google Scholar

31.

A. W. Lehmann, F. Willemse, and K-G. Heller . 2006. Poecilimon gerlindae spec. nov. – a new bushcricket of the Poecilimon propinquus-group (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae) from Greece. Articulata 21:109–119. Google Scholar

32.

G. Lehmann 1998. PhD Thesis. University Erlangen-Nürnberg. 111. pp. Google Scholar

33.

G. U. C. Lehmann and A. W. Lehmann . 2006. Potential lifetime reproductive success for male bushcrickets following parasitism by a phonotactic fly. Animal Behaviour 71:1103–1110. Google Scholar

34.

G. U. C. Lehmann and A. W. Lehmann . 2008. Bushcricket song as a clue for spermatophore size. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62:569–578. Google Scholar

35.

G. U. C. Lehmann and A. W. Lehmann . In press. Condition-dependent spermatophore size is correlated with male's age in a bushcricket (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society.  Google Scholar

36.

G. U. C. Lehmann, K-G. Heller, and A. W. Lehmann . 2001. Male bushcrickets favoured by parasitoid flies when acoustically more attractive for conspecific females (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae/Diptera: Tachinidae). Entomologia Generalis 25:135–140. Google Scholar

37.

A. A. Maklakov, T. Bilde, and Y. Lubin . 2004. Sexual selection for increased male body size and protandry in a spider. Animal Behaviour 68:1041–1048. Google Scholar

38.

S. Masaki 1967. Geographic variation and climatic adaptation in a field cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Evolution 21:725–741. Google Scholar

39.

S. Masaki 1978. Seasonal and latitudinal adaptations in the life cycles of crickets. pp 72–100. In H. Dingle , editor. (Ed.). Evolution of Insect Migration and Diapause. Springer-Verlag. Berlin. Google Scholar

40.

J. McCartney, M. A. Potter, A. W. Robertson, K. Telscher, G. Lehmann, A. Lehmann, D. von-Helversen, and K-G. Heller . 2008. Understanding nuptial gift size in bushcrickets: an analysis of the genus Poecilimon (Tettigoniidae; Orthoptera). Journal of Orthoptera Research 17:231–242. Google Scholar

41.

Y. E. Morbey and R. C. Ydenberg . 2001. Protandrous arrival timing to breeding areas: a review. Ecology Letters 4:663–673. Google Scholar

42.

T. A. Mousseau and D. A. Roff . 1989. Adaptation to seasonality in a cricket: patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation in body size and diapause expression along a cline in season length. Evolution 43:1483–1496. Google Scholar

43.

T. A. Mousseau and D. A. Roff . 1995. Genetic and environmental contributions to geographic variation in the ovipositor length of a cricket. Ecology 76:1473–1482. Google Scholar

44.

R. H. Peters 1983. The Ecological Implications of Body Size. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Google Scholar

45.

P. S. Petraitis, S. J. Beaupre, and A. E. Dunham . 2001. ANCOVA: nonparametric and randomization approaches. pp 116–133. In S. M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch , editors. (Eds). Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. Second Edition. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

46.

K. Reinhold 1994. Inheritance of body and testis size in the bushcricket Poecilimon veluchianus Ramme (Orthoptera; Tettigoniidae) examined by means of subspecies hybrids. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 52:305–316. Google Scholar

47.

D. Roff 1980. Optimizing development time in a seasonal environment: the ‘ups and downs’ of clinal variation. Oecologia 45:202–208. Google Scholar

48.

D. A. Roff 2002. Life History Evolution. Sinauer. Sunderland. Google Scholar

49.

D. A. Roff and T. A. Mousseau . 2005. The evolution of the phenotypic covariance matrix: evidence for selection and drift in Melanoplus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18:1104–1114. Google Scholar

50.

G. J. Sandland and D. J. Minchella . 2004. Life-history plasticity in hosts (Lymnaea elodes) exposed to differing resources and parasitism. Canadian Journal of Zoology 82:1672–1677. Google Scholar

51.

L. W. Simmons, T. Llorenz, M. Schinzig, D. Hosken, and M. Craig . 1994. Sperm competition selects for male mate choice and protandry in the bushcricket Requena verticalis (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Animal Behaviour 47:117–122. Google Scholar

52.

S. C. Stearns 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford University Press. Oxford. Google Scholar

53.

G. Uhl, S. Schmitt, M. A. Schäfer, and W. Blanckenhorn . 2004. Food and sex-specific growth strategies in a spider. Evolutionary Ecology Research 6:523–540. Google Scholar

54.

N. Wedell 1992. Protandry and mate assessment in the wartbiter Decticus verrucivorus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 31:301–308. Google Scholar

55.

C. Wiklund and J. Forsberg . 1991. Sexual size dimorphism in relation to female polygamy and protandry in butterflies: a comparative study of Swedish Pieridae and Satyridae. Oikos 60:373–381. Google Scholar

56.

C. Wiklund and T. Fragerstrom . 1977. Why do males emerge before females? A hypothesis to explain the incidence of protandry in butterflies. Oecologia 31:153–158. Google Scholar
Gerlind U. C. Lehmann and Arne W. Lehmann "Variation in body size among populations of the bushcricket Poecilimon thessalicus (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae): an ecological adaptation," Journal of Orthoptera Research 17(2), 165-169, (1 December 2008). https://doi.org/10.1665/1082-6467-17.2.165
Accepted: 1 March 2008; Published: 1 December 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top