Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2010 Necrophagy in Grasshoppers: Taeniopoda eques Feeds on Mammal Carrion
Douglas W. Whitman, Matthew L. Richardson
Author Affiliations +

Grasshoppers are thought to be herbivores that primarily feed on plant leaves. But, many grasshopper species actually are omnivorous and will consume a wide range of living and dead organic matter. We documented the feeding behavior of the Western Lubber grasshopper, Taeniopoda eques, on a coyote, Canis latrans, carcass in Arizona, USA. The number of adult T. eques on the carcass ranged from 1 to 8 during each of six visits to the site and were predominantly female. Nymphs were not observed on or immediately adjacent to the carcass, although they were present in low numbers in the surrounding population. We observed females attempt to consume hair, dried hide, and especially dried tissue adhering to the bones. Our observation that most of the individuals feeding on the carcass were female, suggests that egg production requires nutrients that may make vertebrate carrion a complement to a herbivorous diet. T. eques lives in a desert habitat with a short and highly variable growing season, so carnivory/necrophagy may be adaptive by providing essential nutrients, thereby speeding oocyte maturation and increasing the likelihood that females will be able to develop and lay eggs before the onset of winter.


Grasshoppers are considered archetypical herbivores that primarily feed on leaves of living plants (Uvarov 1977, Chapman 1990, Chapman & Sword 1997, Muralirangan et al. 1997). However, many grasshopper species actually are omnivorous and will consume a wide range of living and dead organic matter. For example, grasshoppers will feed on mushrooms (Jones et al. 1988), algae (Ball et al. 1942, Bastow et al. 2002), moss and lichens (Duke & Crossley 1975, Behmer & Nes 2003), dead plant matter (McKinlay 1981, Raubenheimer & Bernays 1993, Boppré & Fischer 1994, Bright et al. 1994), soil (Bright et al. 1994), vertebrate feces (Whitman & Orsak 1985, Raubenheimer & Bernays 1993, Bright et al. 1994, O'Neill 1994), invertebrate feces (Bright et al. 1994, O'Neill et al. 1997), paper, wood, fiberglass, linen, silk, and even wool on live sheep (Husain & Mathur 1936, Uvarov 1977, Whitman & Orsak 1985, Boppré & Fischer 1994).

Grasshoppers also can be surprisingly carnivorous/necrophagous, consuming a wide range of animal matter (Whitman et al. 1994). Gut analysis of wild grasshoppers often reveals high levels of arthrophagy: 68% of Hadrotettix trifasciatus in Wyoming and 29% of female Taeniopoda eques in Arizona contained arthropod exoskeletons in their guts or feces (Lavigne & Pfadt 1964, Whitman & Orsak 1985). Grasshoppers often attack and eat weak, wounded, or molting conspecifics in the laboratory and field, especially during periods of food or water deficiency (Ashall & Ellis 1962, Rizvi 1967, Whitman et al. 1994, Bazazi et al. 2008, van Huis et al. 2008, Richardson et al. 2010). For example, nymphs of Schistocerca gregaria consumed molting and newly hatched conspecifics during a drought (Ashall & Ellis 1962). Carnivorous grasshoppers can be very aggressive: Lavigne (1963) watched a Melanoplus foedus repeatedly challenge a large robber fly, Stenopogon coyote, for possession of a dead Amphitornus grasshopper impaled on the fly's proboscis. The large and powerful plains lubber grasshopper, Brachystola magna, will pursue, capture, and consume living arthropods (Chapman 1992, Bright et al. 1994). In Arizona we observed four adult female Western Lubber grasshoppers, T. eques, fight over a single dead sibling, each female pulling the carcass with her mandibles while simultaneously pushing away her competitors with the front or middle legs. Of course, the propensity for carnivory varies with phylogeny and ontogeny, and some grasshopper stages and species exhibit little or no carnivory/necrophagy (Lavigne & Pfadt 1964, Lockwood 1989).

In this paper, we report necrophagy on a coyote carcass by the grasshopper T. eques in the field. T. eques is primarily phytophagous, but opportunistically consumes a wide range of animal materials, including living and dead arthropods, spider silk, and vertebrate and invertebrate feces (Whitman & Orsak 1985, Raubenheimer & Bernays 1993).


T. eques is a large, flightless, and chemically defended species that is native to the deserts of northern Mexico and the southwestern United States (Whitman & Orsak 1985, Whitman & Vincent 2008). While conducting field studies in southeast Arizona, USA on 7 September 1983, we discovered the dried carcass of a coyote (Canis latrans) being fed upon by adult T. eques. The site was ∼5 km east of Portal, Arizona, at ∼ 1,300 m elevation in a cattle-grazed Chihuahuan Desert community containing some elements of the Sonoran Desert. The carcass lay in a water-impoundment area that was ∼25 m in diameter. The impoundment was sometimes filled with runoff to a 50-cm depth, but on this date had completely dried and the silty soil had cracked (Fig. 1). The coyote lay near the center of the impoundment and the nearest low, annual vegetation was ∼2 m distant. Lush honey mesquite (Prosopis juliflora) bushes 2–3 m tall lined the perimeter of the impoundment and the nearest bush was ∼5 m from the carcass. Over 11 d we visited the site a total of six times between 08:00 and 15:30 h in order to observe the feeding behavior of grasshoppers and to note their age and sex.


We observed 1 to 8 adult T. eques on the carcass during each of six visits to the site (Fig. 1). Although the area exhibited high grasshopper diversity, we did not observe other species of grasshopper on the carcass. Nymphs of T. eques were not observed on or immediately adjacent to the carcass, although 15% of the grasshoppers in the surrounding population were nymphs at the beginning of the study. The total number of females (20) on the carcass across all dates, outnumbered males (2), despite an abundance of males in nearby vegetation. Most individuals on the carcass were actively feeding, based on observing or hearing their mandibles scraping various body parts. We observed females attempt to consume hair, dried hide, and especially dried tissue adhering to the bones (Fig. 2). Some females entered and fed inside the body cavity of the carcass (Fig. 3).

Fig. 1.

A carcass of a coyote (Canis latrans) being fed upon by adult female T. eques grasshoppers in a dried water-impoundment area near Portal, Arizona, USA. For color version, see Plate XV.



T. eques primarily feeds on plants (Whitman & Orsak 1985, Raubenheimer & Bernays 1993). However, we found individuals feeding on a mammal carcass despite an abundance of green vegetation within and around the study area. In fact, the grasshoppers had to leave the vegetation and travel 5 to 15 m over dry and relatively barren soil to reach the carcass, suggesting an attraction to this food resource. Grasshoppers can orient to odors from plants (Helms et al. 2003) and odors emanating from insect carcasses, especially fatty acids (Bomar 1993). T. eques may have used similar chemical cues to locate this mammal carcass.

Fig. 2.

Female T. eques consuming dried tissue adhering to the bones of a coyote carcass. For color version, see Plate XV.


Fig. 3.

Female T. eques consuming dried tissue inside the body cavity of a coyote carcass. For colorversion, see Plate XV.


Why is T. eques necrophagous? Plant tissue, the primary diet of these insects, generally contains low titers of proteins, lipids, and certain minerals that are essential for all insects (Mattson & Scriber 1987, Slansky 1993, Whitman et al. 1994) and strict herbivory may not promote optimal growth, development, and fecundity. Nitrogen can be especially limiting for insect herbivores (Mattson 1980). Grasshoppers will self-select diets high in protein when offered a choice between high and low protein diets (Behmer & Joern 1993). Adopting a broader diet may provide a herbivore with better nutrition and improve fitness. For example, grasshoppers that feed on plants or artificial diets with high nitrogen, or include meat, amino acids, or complex protein in their diet, have increased growth, developmental rate, survival, oocyte development, and fecundity (Ashall & Ellis 1962, Rizvi 1967, MacFarlane & Thorsteinson 1980, Whitman et al. 1994, Chapman & Sword 1997, Joern & Behmer 1997, Danner & Joern 2004).

Interestingly, we observed that nearly all the T. eques feeding on the carcass were adult females. Behmer and Joern (1994) noted that adult female grasshoppers and not males, preferred diets high in the amino acid proline. These observations suggest that adult females, in particular, may have an elevated need for protein and other nutrients that are more abundant in animal tissue to produce eggs. Dietary protein and lipids and rapid oocyte production may be especially important for T. eques because it lives in a desert habitat with an extremely short growing (rainy) season (Stauffer et al. 2011). This environmental constraint is compounded by the fact that T. eques deposits a relatively large egg pod of 37–79 eggs, weighing ∼3 g, which accounts for approximately one-third of the mass of a gravid adult female (Whitman 1986, Stauffer & Whitman 2007). Therefore, carnivory/necrophagy may be adaptive for this desert species because these foods may speed maturation time and increase the likelihood that females can develop and lay their eggs before the onset of winter (Whitman 1987, 1988).

Necrophagy also has potentially negative effects. Carnivory/necrophagy can reduce fitness of grasshoppers and other insects if the prey is diseased (Whitman et al. 1994, Richardson et al. 2010). Grasshoppers are attacked by a vast array of pathogens (Streett & McGuire 1990) that may be acquired by feeding on diseased, dead, or dying animals and their excrement (Lockwood & Ewen 1990, Lange et al. 2009). For instance, the microsporidian Encephalitozoon romalea is endemic to populations of the omnivorous Eastern Lubber Grasshopper, Romalea microptera, a close relative of T. eques. This pathogen is acquired via consumption of contaminated feces, and may quickly kill infected R. microptera (Lange et al. 2009). Interestingly, this genus of microsporidia generally is restricted to vertebrates, and, in fact, many primary pathogens of humans belong to this genus (Johny et al. 2009, Lange et al. 2009).

The discovery that grasshoppers and vertebrates share this group of pathogens suggests the possibility of a previous host-jump from vertebrates to invertebrates or vice versa (Johny et al. 2009). R. microptera may have fed on infected vertebrate carcasses or feces, thereby becoming infected with E. romalea and becoming a reservoir or alternative host for E. romalea (Johny et al. 2009). Likewise, vertebrate predators might become infected by feeding on R. microptera. Field observations and circumstantial evidence indicate that interphyla transmission of grasshopper pathogens is possible (Nunamaker et al. 2003), but no research to date has demonstrated this phenomenon in lubber grasshoppers.


We thank R. F. Mitchell and P. F. Reagel for constructive comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. This research was supported by NSF grant DBI 0442412.



C. Ashall , P. Ellis 1962. Studies on numbers and mortality in field populations of the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria Forskål). Anti-Locust Bulletin No. 38: Anti-Locust Research Centre, London. Google Scholar


E.D. Ball, E.R. Tinkham, R. Flock, C.T. Vorheis 1942. The grasshoppers and other Orthoptera of Arizona. Arizona Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 93: 257–373. Google Scholar


J.L. Bastow, J.L. Sabo, J.C. Finlay, M.A. Power 2002. Abasal aquatic-terrestrial trophic link in rivers: algal subsidies via shore-dwelling grasshoppers. Oecologia 131: 261–268. Google Scholar


S. Bazazi, J. Buhl, J.J. Hale, M.X. Anstey, G.A. Sword, S.J. Simpson, I.D. Couzin 2008. Collective motion and cannibalism in locust migratory bands. Current Biology 18: 735–739. Google Scholar


S.T. Behmer, A. Joern 1993. Diet choice by a grass-feeding grasshopper based on the need for a limiting nutrient. Functional Ecology 7: 522–527. Google Scholar


S. Behmer, A. Joern 1994. The influence of proline on diet selection: sex-specific feeding preferences by the grasshoppers Ageneotettix deorum and Phoetaliotes nebrascensis (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Oecologia 98: 76–82. Google Scholar


S.T. Behmer, W.D. Nes 2003. Insect sterol nutrition and physiology: a global overview. Advances in Insect Physiology 31: 1–72. Google Scholar


C.R. Bomar 1993. The olfactory basis for cannibalism in rangeland grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae): applications for improved control using bran baits. PhD. Dissertation, University of Wyoming. Google Scholar


M. Boppré, O.W. Fischer 1994. Zonocerus and Chromolaena in West Africa: a chemoecological approach towards pest management, pp. 107–126. In: S. Krall , H. Wilps (Eds) New Trends in Locust Control. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH, Eschborn, Germany. Google Scholar


K.L. Bright, E.A. Bernays, V.C. Moran 1994. Foraging patterns and dietary mixing in the field by the generalist grasshopper Brachystola magna (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Journal of Insect Behavior 7: 779–793. Google Scholar


R.F. Chapman 1990. Food selection, pp. 39–72. In: R.F. Chapman , A. Joern (Eds) Biology of Grasshoppers. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Google Scholar


R.F. Chapman 1992. Predacious grasshoppers in Arizona. Metaleptea 14: 7. Google Scholar


R.F. Chapman, G.A. Sword 1997. Polyphagy in the Acridomorpha, pp. 183–195. In: S.K. Gangwere , M.C. Muralirangan , M. Muralirangan (Eds) Bionomics of the Orthopteroids. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. Google Scholar


B.J. Danner, A. Joern 2004. Development, growth and egg production of Ageneotettix deorum (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in response to spider predation risk and elevated resource quality. Ecological Entomology 29: 1–11. Google Scholar


K.M. Duke, D.A. Crossley Jr. 1975. Population energetics and ecology of the rock grasshopper, Trimerotropis saxatilis. Ecology 56: 1106–1117. Google Scholar


J.B. Helms, C.M. Booth, J. Rivera, J.A. Siegler, S. Wuellner, D.W. Whitman 2003. Lubber grasshoppers, Romalea microptera (Beauvois), orient to plant odors in a wind tunnel. Journal of Orthoptera Research 12: 135–140. Google Scholar


M.A. Husain, D.B. Mathur 1936. Studies of Schistocerca gregaria Forsk. III. Why locusts eat wool. A study in the hydromania of Schistocerca gregaria. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 6: 263–267. Google Scholar


A. Joern, S.T. Behmer 1997. Importance of dietary nitrogen and carbohydrates to survival, growth and reproduction in adults of the grasshopper Ageneotettix deorum (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Oecologia 112: 201–208. Google Scholar


S. Johny, T.M. Larson, L.F. Solter, K.A. Edwards, D.W. Whitman 2009. Phylogenetic characterization of Encephalitozoon romaleae (Microsporidia) from a grasshopper host: relationship to Encephalitozoon spp. infecting humans. Infection Genetics and Evolution 9: 189–195. Google Scholar


G.G. Jones, D.W. Whitman, P.J. Silk, M.S. Blum 1988. Diet breadth and insect chemical defenses: a generalist grasshopper and a general hypotheses, pp. 477–512. In: K.C. Spencer (Ed.) Chemical Mediation of Coevolution. Academic Press, San Diego. Google Scholar


C.E. Lange, S. Johny, M.D. Baker, D.W. Whitman, L.F. Solter 2009. A new Encephalitozoon species (Microsporidia) isolated from the lubber grasshopper, Romalea microptera (Beauvois) (Orthoptera: Romaleidae). Journal of Parasitology 94: 976–986. Google Scholar


R.J. Lavigne 1963. Notes on the behavior of Stenopogon coyote Bromley with a description of the eggs. Pan-Pacific Entomologist 39: 103–107. Google Scholar


R.J. Lavigne, R.E. Pfadt 1964. The role of rangeland grasshoppers as scavengers. Journal Kansas Entomological Society 37: 1–4. Google Scholar


J.A. Lockwood 1989. Ontogeny of cannibalism in rangeland grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Journal Kansas Entomological Society 62: 534–541. Google Scholar


J.A. Lockwood, A.B. Ewen 1990. Biological control of rangeland grasshoppers and locusts, pp. 421–442. In: S.K. Gangwere , M.C. Muralirangan , M. Muralirangan (Eds) Bionomics of the Orthopteroids. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. Google Scholar


J.H. MacFarlane, A.J. Thorsteinson 1980. Development and survival of the twostriped grasshopper, Melanoplus bivittatus (Say) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) on various single and multiple plant diets. Acrida 9: 63–76 Google Scholar


W.J. Mattson Jr. 1980. Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 119–161. Google Scholar


W.J. Mattson, J.M. Scriber 1987. Nutritional ecology of insect folivores of woody plants: nitrogen, water, fiber, and mineral considerations, pp. 105–146. In: F. Slansky Jr., J.G. Rodriguez (Eds) Nutritional Ecology of Insects, Mites, Spiders, and Related Invertebrates. Wiley, New York. Google Scholar


K.S. McKinlay 1981. The importance of dry plant material in the diet of the grasshopper Melanoplus sanguinipes. Canadian Entomologist 113: 5–8. Google Scholar


M.C. Muralirangan, M. Muralirangan, P.D. Partho 1997. Feeding behavior and host selection strategies in acridids, pp. 163–182. In: S.K. Gangwere , M.C. Muralirangan , M. Muralirangan (Eds) Bionomics of the Orthopteroids. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. Google Scholar


R.A. Nunamaker, J.A. Lockwood, C.E. Stith, C.L. Campbell, S.P. Schell, B.S. Drolet, W.C. Wilson, D.M. White, G.J. Letchworth 2003. Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) could serve as reservoirs and vectors of vesicular stomatitis virus. Journal of Medical Entomology 40: 957–963. Google Scholar


K.M. O'Neill 1994. Livestock dung as a food resource and thermal refuge for rangeland grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist 70: 222–229. Google Scholar


K.M. O'Neill, S.A. Woods, D.A. Streett 1997. Grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) foraging on grasshopper feces: observational and rubidiumlabeling studies. Environmental Entomology 26: 1224–1231. Google Scholar


D. Raubenheimer, E.A. Bernays 1993. Patterns offeeding in the polyphagous grasshopper Taeniopoda eques: a field study. Animal Behaviour 45: 153–167. Google Scholar


M.X. Richardson, R.F. Mitchell, P.F. Reagel, L.M. Hanks 2010. Causes and consequences of cannibalism in noncarnivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 55: 39–53. Google Scholar


K.A. Rizvi 1967. A preliminary observation on cannibalistic habit in Hieroglyphus nigropletus Bolivar (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Mushi 41: 71–73. Google Scholar


F. Slansky Jr. 1993. Nutritional ecology: the fundamental quest for nutrients, pp. 29–91. In: N.E. Stamp , T.M. Casey (Eds) Caterpillars. Ecological and Evolutionary Constraints on Foraging. Chapman and Hall, New York. Google Scholar


T.W. Stauffer, D.W. Whitman 2007. Divergent oviposition behaviors in a desert vs a marsh grasshopper. Journal of Orthoptera Research 16: 103–114. Google Scholar


T.W. Stauffer, J.D. Hatle, D.W. Whitman 2011. Divergent egg physiologies in two closely related grasshopper species Taeniopoda eques versus Romalea microptera (Orthoptera: Romaleidae). Environmental Entomology 40: 157–166. Google Scholar


D.A. Streett , M.R. McGuire 1990. Pathogenic diseases of grasshoppers, pp. 483–516. In: R.F. Chapman , A. Joern (Eds) Biology of Grasshoppers. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Google Scholar


B. Uvarov 1977. Grasshoppers and Locusts. Centre for Overseas Pest Research, London. Google Scholar


Huis A. van, G. Woldewahid, K. Toleubayev, W. van der Werf 2008. Relationships between food quality and fitness in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria, and its distribution over habitats on the Red Sea coastal plain of Sudan. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 127: 144–156. Google Scholar


D.W. Whitman 1986. Laboratory biology of Taeniopoda eques (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Journal of Entomological Science 21: 87–93. Google Scholar


D.W. Whitman 1987. Thermoregulation and daily activity patterns in a black desert grasshopper, Taeniopoda eques. Animal Behaviour 35: 1814–1826. Google Scholar


D.W. Whitman 1988. The function and evolution of thermoregulation in the grasshopper Taeniopoda eques. Journal of Animal Ecology 57: 369–383. Google Scholar


D.W. Whitman, L.J. Orsak 1985. Biology of Taeniopoda eques (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in southeastern Arizona. Annals Entomological Society of America 78: 811–825. Google Scholar


D.W. Whitman, S. Vincent 2008. Large size as an anti-predator defense in a grasshopper. Journal of Orthoptera Research 17: 353–371. Google Scholar


D.W. Whitman, M.S. Blum, F. Slansky Jr. 1994. Carnivory in phytophagous insects, pp. 161–205. In: T.N. Ananthakrishnan (Ed.) Functional Dynamics of Phytophagous Insects. Oxford & IBH, New Delhi. Google Scholar
Douglas W. Whitman and Matthew L. Richardson "Necrophagy in Grasshoppers: Taeniopoda eques Feeds on Mammal Carrion," Journal of Orthoptera Research 19(2), 377-380, (1 December 2010).
Received: 7 September 2010; Accepted: 15 December 2010; Published: 1 December 2010
Western Lubber
Back to Top