Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2008 Notes on Great Horned Owls Nesting in the Rocky Mountains, with a Description of a New Subspecies
Robert W. Dickerman, Andrew B. Johnson
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The Great Horned Owls (Bubo virginianus) of the Rocky Mountains were last comprehensively reviewed by Oberholser in 1904, who resurrected the name B. v. occidentalis. With minor modifications, this has been followed to date. With the suppression of occidentalis, which proved to be a synonym of subarcticus (Stone 1897 Am. Nat. 31:236; Dickerman 1991 Auk 108:964–965), the southern Rocky Mountain population, south of the Snake River in Idaho, was left without a name. Canonical discriminant analysis of 14 color and pattern characters provided 100% separation of the southern Rocky Mountain population nesting in higher elevation pinyon/oak/pine associations from those nesting at low elevations in Arizona and New Mexico (B. v. pallescens) and from the northern Rocky Mountain population north of the Snake River (B. v. lagophonus). Pair-wise comparisons showed that the mean vectors from each of the three populations were significantly different from each other (P < 0.001). We propose that the Great Horned Owls of the southern Rocky Mountains south of the Snake River of Idaho may now be known as Bubo virginianus pinorum, a new subspecies.

The Great Horned Owl (Bubo virginianus) is common, widespread, adaptable, and geographically variable throughout North America south of the arctic tundra. Phenotypic variation in Great Horned Owls has often been at least partially attributed to polymorphism or color morphs. Oberholser (1904) wrote, “With the exception of occidentalis and wapacuthu [both are synonyms of subarcticus; Stone 1897, Browning and Banks 1990] all [populations] seem to be strictly non-migratory, and thus any record may safely be considered as based on the resident bird.” Thus he invoked “dichromatism” with light, dark, and ochraceous morphs to explain the variation within populations. That taxonomic revision of the subspecies of Great Horned Owls by Oberholser (1904) has, with minor modifications, been followed to date (AOU 1910, 1931, 1957, Ridgway 1914, Cory 1918, Peters 1940, Behle 1985, McGillivray 1989). In his revision of B. virginianus, Weick (1999), following Oberholser (1904), used the trinomial B. v. occidentalis which had been suppressed over a hundred years earlier (Stone 1897, Dickerman 1991, 2002), and mapped its range to include parts of the ranges of B. v. pallescens, B. v. subarcticus, and the new subspecies described herein. He used the name B. v. wapacuthu (suppressed by Browning and Banks 1990; also cf, Dickerman 1993) and left the range of the Rocky Mountain subspecies north of the Snake River, lagophonus, undesignated.

In Arizona, Phillips et al. (1964) recognized that birds from wooded areas tended to have darker feet, but felt that individual variation was so great that “… no violence to the facts” would be done to call all Arizona birds by the same subspecific name. Rea (1983) reviewed the situation in Arizona, recognizing color phases within B. v. pallescens and did not mention migration, except for a dark bird considered to be B. v. saturatus by K. Parkes, but re-identified as B. v. lagophonus (R. Dickerman unpubl. data; reference number MSB 14754).

In Colorado, Bailey and Niedrach (1965) used the names occidentalis and lagophonus for light and dark phenotypes (respectively). Burleigh (1972) recognized a light form in southern Idaho for which he used the name occidentalis and a darker form in northern Idaho for which he used lagophonus. Behle (1985) used occidentalis for the dark birds of northern Utah. These usages have thoroughly confused the subspecies taxonomy of the Great Horned Owls of the Rocky Mountains south of the Snake River.

During 1988 and 1989, the American Museum of Natural History received two shipments of winter-salvaged Scottsdale region Great Horned Owls from the Liberty Wildlife Rehabilitation Foundation of Scottsdale, Arizona. Included were pale gray and medium gray birds, and a single very dark bird. Similarly, in 1989, RWD studied the Museum of Southwestern Biology (MSB) series of 20 specimens from throughout New Mexico. Nearly half of the birds were pale, nearly half were medium gray, and two were very dark. When the localities of the pale and medium gray specimens were plotted on a map of New Mexico, a pattern was evident. All the pale birds, from various seasons, were from desert/grassland areas of southern and eastern parts of the state. The medium gray birds, from spring, summer and fall, were from forested regions (pinyon/oak or higher elevational plant associations) or were salvaged during winter months in the lowlands (and thus may have made elevational migrations). The two dark New Mexico winter specimens, like the dark salvaged bird from Scottsdale and the dark specimen reported by Rea (1983), matched well the specimens of B. v. lagophonus from eastern Washington, Idaho north of the Snake River, and interior mountains north to Alaska; thus, they were long-distance migrants (Dickerman and Harden in press). This exercise was later repeated with similar results with the larger series of specimens from Colorado in the Denver Museum of Natural History; from Utah in the Utah Museum of Natural History, Salt Lake City; and from the very large New Mexico series in the MSB, which has now grown to 224 specimens. This mapping exercise demonstrated that there was a distinct medium-gray colored population of the Rocky Mountains from southern Idaho to the higher elevations of Arizona and New Mexico that had no subspecific designation. Having handled hundreds of Great Horned Owl specimens, we believe that there are no color morphs or polymorphism in western North American Great Horned Owls (contra Oberholser 1904, Rea 1983, Weick 1999), and that color variation can be explained by the mix of the various subspecies, some of which undertake elevational and/or latitudinal migration.

In this report, we review geographic variation in Great Horned Owls in the Rocky Mountains (herein defined to include the interior ranges from Alaska south to the sky islands of Arizona and New Mexico), and we describe the medium-gray subspecies of the dry Rocky Mountain pine forests south of the Snake River Valley in southern Idaho.

Materials and Methods

Materials

The color standards described were used to compare specimens in the following collections: Academy of Natural Science, Philadelphia, PA; American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY; Bird and Mammal Museum, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID; Charles R. Connor Museum, Washington State University, Pullman, WA; Denver Museum of Natural History, Denver, CO; Idaho Natural History Museum, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID; Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Museum of Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX; National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC; Texas Cooperative Wildlife Collection, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX; University of Alaska Museum, Fairbanks, AK; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

Measurements were obtained on additional specimens from the following: Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Canada; Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL; Slater Museum of Natural History, University of Puget Sound, Tacoma, WA; Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA; Stoval Museum, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK; University of Nebraska State Museum, Lincoln, NE; and Vertebrate Collections, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

Methods

To quantify color values, and to a lesser degree the extent of pattern differences among populations, we selected a series of five specimens from the American Museum of Natural History that spanned the gradient of color variation from the palest to the darkest populations throughout the range of the species in North America (Fig. 1). From this reference series, 14 color or pattern characters were selected a priori and assigned a value of 1–5. The Rocky Mountain populations in this study did not span this entire range, with 1 being the palest and 3 or 4 the darkest value, depending on the character. (A score of 5 was not used as only B. v. saturatus reached that darkness and that subspecies does not pertain to this study because it is outside our defined geographic area.) Each specimen examined was scored for the 14 color and pattern characters by comparison with the reference series. Wing chord and tail length were measured to the nearest millimeter. All scores and measurements were by RWD. Rocky Mountain populations from Alaska to central Idaho, and dark long-distance migrants (Dickerman and Harden in press) were considered to be lagophonus Oberholser (1904, type locality: Walla Walla, Washington). Birds from southern Idaho southward to the higher elevations of Arizona and New Mexico were considered to be the undescribed form (named below). Populations from the deserts and grasslands of Arizona and New Mexico were considered to be pallescens Stone 1897, type locality: Watson Ranch, 29 km southwest of San Antonio, TX U.S.A. Nesting-season birds from those areas, and wintering birds that matched them morphologically were analyzed as the above three populations.

Figure 1

Specimens used as color standards, all from the American Museum of Natural History (from left to right): (A) B. v. subarcticus 753972, Winnipeg, Manitoba, 1900; (B) B. v. pallescens 8260141, 6.0 km SW of Lordsburg, Hidalgo Co., New Mexico, 15 January 1989; (C) B. v. pinorum 826016, Glorieta, Santa Fe Co., New Mexico, 8 March 1988; (D) B. v. lagophonus 826010, Santa Fe (airport), Santa Fe Co., New Mexico, 13 October 1988; and (E) B. v. saturatus 754056, Washington, 7 April 1894.

i0892-1016-42-1-20-f01.gif

Statistical Analysis

Canonical discriminant analysis (SAS 9.1.1; PROC CANDISC) was used to generalize the two canonical discriminants, which were plotted against each other to visualize this 14-character dataset in two dimensions (Fig. 2).

Figure 2

Scattergram of the first two canonical discriminants derived from the scores of fourteen plumage color and pattern characters from three subspecies of Great Horned Owls in the Rocky Mountains (see methods; triangles = B. v. pallescens, circles = B. v. pinorum, and squares = B. v. lagophonus).

i0892-1016-42-1-20-f02.gif

No assumption of normality or equal variances was made for this data set, and nonparametric statistical methods were used. To test for differences among populations, a nonparametric MANOVA was conducted using the program PERMANOVA (Anderson 2005) based on methods outlined by Anderson (2001). The analysis was performed using a Euclidian distance matrix, and 9999 iterations were permutated to calculate the P-values presented. Pair-wise comparisons between groups were also made in PERMANOVA, again using 9999 iterations to generate the P-values for the pair-wise tests. The limitations of PERMANOVA necessitated that sample sizes for each population be equal, and that there were no missing values in the data matrix. Therefore the number of pallescens and the southern Rocky Mountain population used in the analysis were reduced to the same number as lagophonus (N = 49) by generating a series of random numbers and eliminating corresponding records so that each population sample contained 49 individuals. There was no observed sexual dimorphism in color or pattern within subspecies, so data were combined (Appendix).

Results and Discussion

A plot of the first two canonical discriminants based on the 14 color and pattern characters showed good separation of lowland pallescens from montane populations of lagophonus from the new subspecies described below, but there was overlap between the two montane populations. Nine of the 14 color/pattern characters (Table 2), of which six were statistically significant, were diagnostically useful in distinguishing the three subspecies. Characters with the highest correlations for discriminant 1 were back-color, barring on flanks, and interscapular black spots; and for discriminant 2 were back-color, barring on toes, and color in outer vane of outer rectrix (Table 3).

Table 1

Fourteen color/pattern characters and the specimen upon which they were based, A–E (see Figure 1).

i0892-1016-42-1-20-t01.gif

Table 2

Major diagnostic color/pattern characteristics of three subspecies of Great Horned Owls.1

i0892-1016-42-1-20-t02.gif

Table 3

Observed variables of 14 color/pattern characters (see Table 1) and their weights on discriminate/canonical variables 1 and 2.

i0892-1016-42-1-20-t03.gif

There was a significant difference among mean vectors of the three populations (F = 42.3, df = 2,144, P < 0.001), and pair-wise comparisons showed that the mean vector for each subspecies was significantly different from the other two (t = 3.6–9.1; df = 96, P < 0.001). There were no differences in wing chord and tail measurements among the three subspecies from Arizona and New Mexico in the south through the northern Rockies (Table 4).

Table 4

Wing chord and tail length for three subspecies of Great Horned Owls, all in basic plumage (number of specimens, mean, standard deviation, range, median).

i0892-1016-42-1-20-t04.gif

Because of the separability of these populations using both visual and statistical techniques, we propose that the Great Horned Owls of the Rocky Mountains south of the Snake River of Idaho may now be known as:

Bubo virginianus pinorum, new subspecies

Holotype

MSB 23728. Female. New Mexico, Bernalillo Co., Sandia Mountains, Cedar Crest (35°6.4′N, 106°22.6′W; elevation 2042 m). Collected by J. David Ligon on 15 December 2002. Field number RWD 26222. Ovary 9 × 16 mm, very fat, mass 1246 g.

Diagnosis

Similar to B. v. pallescens, but with heavier barring ventrally and darker gray dorsally with larger areas of sooty black in the feathers of the crown and back; paler than B. v. lagophonus, with lighter barring on the venter and with weaker or no barring on the tarsi and toes, which are often pure white.

Etymology

The name is from the Latin, meaning “of the pines.”

Distribution

Nests in dry coniferous forests from the plains of the Snake River of Idaho, south in the Rockies at increasing elevations, to Arizona and New Mexico. Occurs regularly at lower elevations in winter (Dickerman and Harden in press).

It is interesting that pinorum is morphologically more distinct from pallescens than it is from lagophonus, although the ranges of pinorum and pallescens may be only a few miles apart by air. Conversely, pinorum and lagophonus are less distinct, yet their ranges are separated, at least by the lowland plains of broad Snake River Valley in southern Idaho. Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) is the dominant species in the nesting range of pinorum, at least in Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, and Colorado. North of the Snake River is the more mesic spruce-fir-hemlock forest of the northern Rockies and the range of lagophonus.

During the course of this study, two specimens of pinorum salvaged during the nesting season were received from wildlife rehabilitators from the lowlands of New Mexico: a female found 11 March 1994 at Corrales (35°14.3′N, 106°36.3′W; elevation 1530 m), Sandoval Co. (MSB 18804) and a male found at Luis Lopez (33°59.5′N, 106°53.5′W; elevation 1414 m), Socorro Co., on 18 May 2002 (MSB 23756). Both of these localities in central New Mexico are near the Rio Grande nesting habitat of pallescens. The Corrales specimen was a first-year bird and may simply have been a late migrant. The Luis Lopez specimen was an apparently normal male with testes measuring 5 × 7 mm. An Arizona specimen of lagophonus taken 2 August 1974 (Rea 1983) had a pre-existing pellet hole on the skull between the eyes, an injury that may have prevented migration.

Because of the uniformity of the populations herein considered to be B. v. pinorum, short-distance, elevational migration cannot be distinguished from long-distance, latitudinal migration. Elevational migration was demonstrated by a bird banded as a nestling 29 April 1988 in Sandia Canyon (elevation 2286 m) in the Jemez Mountains, Sandoval Co., New Mexico and found dead 19 December 1988 ca. 25 km distant near a bridge over the Rio Grande on the south side of Espanola (elevation 1704 m), Rio Arriba Co., New Mexico. We suggest that Great Horned Owls nesting in habitats that are affected by heavy snow conditions in the winter may perform elevational and/or latitudinal migration, at least to some degree.

Conclusions

The Great Horned Owls of the Rocky Mountains (as geographically defined in this paper) may now be considered to consist of three populations from north to south (Fig. 3): (1) Bubo virginianus lagophonus of the northern Rockies inhabits the more mesic spruce/fir/hemlock forests north of the Snake River in Idaho; (2) B. v. pinorum nests in the dry coniferous forests at middle and high elevations in Arizona and New Mexico, in these habitats extending north of the southern Rocky Mountains to at least the Snake River of Idaho; (3) B. v. pallescens nests in the deserts and desert grasslands, and the lowland riparian areas of Arizona and New Mexico, extending north in suitable habitats into at least Utah and Colorado (as well as western Kansas and Oklahoma; Dickerman 1993). These three populations differ serially in color and are generally separated by habitat in the nesting season. In the winter, some individuals of pinorum and lagophonus withdraw from their nesting habitat, with pinorum undergoing elevational migration (with latitudinal migration probable but not yet demonstrated), and with lagophonus undergoing both elevational and latitudinal migration and occurring sporadically in the lowlands of Arizona, New Mexico, and Colorado (MSB specimens).

Figure 3

Dorsal and ventral views of three subspecies of Great Horned Owls from the northern to southern Rocky Mountains (left to right): (A) B. v. pallescens MSB 7684, female, New Mexico (Lincoln Co., ca. 32 km south of Corona), 29 September 1991. (B) B. v. pinorum Type, MSB 23728, female, New Mexico (Bernalillo Co., Cedar Crest), 15 December 2002; (C) B. v. lagophonus MSB 7011, female, Oregon (Union Co., near Grange), 3 December 1989;

i0892-1016-42-1-20-f03.gif

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the wildlife rehabilitators of Arizona and New Mexico, without whom this research could not have been conducted. Figure 1 was provided by the photography department of the American Museum of Natural History. Technical editing and formatting were provided by Janelle Harden. We gratefully acknowledge Maureen Leonard, Anne C. Russell, and Ernest Valdez for assistance with the statistical analysis done for this project. Lastly, this manuscript was greatly clarified by the reviews of Dwight Smith and C. Stuart Houston.

Literature Cited

1.

AOU (American Ornithologists' Union) 1910. Check-list of North American birds, Third Ed. American Ornithologists' Union. New York, NY U.S.A. Google Scholar

2.

AOU (American Ornithologists' Union) 1931. Check-list of North American birds, Fourth Ed. American Ornithologists' Union. Lancaster, PA U.S.A. Google Scholar

3.

AOU (American Ornithologists' Union) 1957. Check-list of North American birds, Fifth Ed. American Ornithologists' Union. Baltimore, MD U.S.A. Google Scholar

4.

M. J. Anderson 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariant analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 25:32–46. Google Scholar

5.

M. J. Anderson 2005. PERMANOVA, a FORTRAN computer program for permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Dept. of Statistics, Univ. of Auckland. New Zealand. Google Scholar

6.

A. M. Bailey and R. J. Niedrach . 1965. Birds of Colorado. Denver Mus. Nat. Hist. Denver, CO U.S.A. Google Scholar

7.

W. H. Behle 1985. Utah birds: geographic distribution and systematics. Occas. Publ. No. 6, Utah Mus. Nat. Hist. Salt Lake City, UT U.S.A. Google Scholar

8.

M. R. Browning and R. C. Banks . 1990. The identity of Pennant's “Wapacuthu Owl” and the subspecific name for the population of Bubo virginianus west of Hudson Bay. J. Raptor Res 24:80–83. Google Scholar

9.

T. D. Burleigh 1972. Birds of Idaho. Caxton Printers Ltd. Caldwell, ID U.S.A. Google Scholar

10.

C. B. Cory 1918. Catalogue of birds of the Americas and the adjacent islands, Part 2, no. 1. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Publ. 197, Zool. Series no. 13.  Google Scholar

11.

R. W. Dickerman 1991. On the validity of Bubo virginianus occidentalis Stone. Auk 108:964–965. Google Scholar

12.

R. W. Dickerman 1993. The subspecies of Great Horned Owls of the central Great Plains, with notes on adjacent areas. Bull. Kan. Ornithol. Soc 344:17–21. Google Scholar

13.

R. W. Dickerman 2002. The taxonomy of the subarctic Great Horned Owl, Bubo virginianus subarcticus nesting in the United States. Am. Midl. Nat 148:198–199. Google Scholar

14.

R. W. Dickerman and J. E. Harden . In press. Great Horned Owl. In J. L. E. Cartron , editor. The raptors of New Mexico. Univ. New Mexico Press. Albuquerque, NM U.S.A. Google Scholar

15.

W. B. McGillivray 1989. Geographic variation in size and reverse dimorphism of the Great Horned Owl in North America. Condor 91:777–786. Google Scholar

16.

H. C. Oberholser 1904. A revision of the Great Horned Owls. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus 27:177–192. Google Scholar

17.

J. L. Peters 1940. Check-list of birds of the world, Vol. 4. Harvard Press. Cambridge, MA U.S.A. Google Scholar

18.

A. R. Phillips, J. T. Marshall, and G. Monson . 1964. The birds of Arizona. Univ. Arizona Press. Tucson, AZ U.S.A. Google Scholar

19.

A. Rea 1983. Once a river: bird life and habitat changes on the middle Gila River. Univ. Arizona Press. Tucson, AZ U.S.A. Google Scholar

20.

R. Ridgway 1914. The birds of North and Middle America, Part 6. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. No. 50.  Google Scholar

21.

W. Stone 1897. Proper name for the western Horned Owl of North America. Am. Nat 31:236. Google Scholar

22.

F. Weick 1999. Zur Taxonomie der Amerikanishen Uhus (Bubo spp.). Okpl. Vogel 21:363–387. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix

Appendix

Six statistically significant color/pattern differences scored categorically from 1–5, for three subspecies of Great Horned Owls; mean and standard deviation (SD), range, median, and number (N).

i0892-1016-42-1-20-t05.gif
Robert W. Dickerman and Andrew B. Johnson "Notes on Great Horned Owls Nesting in the Rocky Mountains, with a Description of a New Subspecies," Journal of Raptor Research 42(1), 20-28, (1 March 2008). https://doi.org/10.3356/JRR-06-75.1
Received: 14 November 2006; Accepted: 1 October 2007; Published: 1 March 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
Bubo virginianus
great horned owl
mophometrics
population
Rocky Mountains
subspecies
taxonomy
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top