How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2014 Flea (Siphonaptera) Species Richness in the Great Basin Desert andIsland Biogeography Theory
Robert L. Bossard
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Numbers of flea (Siphonaptera) species (flea species richness) on individual mammals should be higher on large mammals, mammals with dense populations, and mammals with large geographic ranges, if mammals are islands for fleas. I tested the first two predictions with regressions of H. J. Egoscue's trapping data on flea species richness collected from individual mammals against mammal size and population density from the literature. Mammal size and population density did not correlate with flea species richness. Mammal geographic range did, in earlier studies. The intermediate-sized (31 g), moderately dense (0.004 individuals/m2) Peromyscus truei (Shufeldt) had the highest richness with eight flea species on one individual. Overall, island biogeography theory does not describe the distribution of flea species on mammals in the Great Basin Desert, based on H. J. Egoscue's collections. Alternatively, epidemiological or metapopulation theories may explain flea species richness.

Robert L. Bossard "Flea (Siphonaptera) Species Richness in the Great Basin Desert andIsland Biogeography Theory," Journal of Vector Ecology 39(1), 164-167, (1 June 2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7134.2014.12083.x
Received: 12 December 2014; Accepted: 11 February 2014; Published: 1 June 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
fleas
host density
host range
host size
island biogeography theory
species richness
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top