Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 October 2018 Seroprevalence of Equine Herpesviruses 1 and 9 (EHV-1 and EHV-9) in Wild Grévy's Zebra (Equus grevyi) in Kenya
Louise Guevara, Azza Abdelgawad, Cynthia Onzere, Alex D. Greenwood, Zeke Davidson, Richard Bishop, Mathew Mutinda
Author Affiliations +

Equid herpesviruses types 1 (EHV-1) and 9 (EHV-9) are unusual among herpesviruses in that they lack strong host specificity, and the full extent of their host range remains unclear. The virus establishes latency for long periods and can be reactivated and shed, resulting in clinical disease in susceptible species. A sensitive and specific peptide-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was developed to study the seroprevalence of both viruses in a broad range of species among both wild and captive populations. We used this assay to study the seroprevalences of EHV-1 and EHV-9 in a natural population of the highly endangered Grévy's zebra (Equus grevyi) in Kenya, sampled during a 4-yr period (2012–15). The results were compared with those obtained from captive Grévy's zebras from a previous study. The wild population had a significantly higher seroprevalence of EHV-9 compared with the captive population, suggesting that captivity might reduce exposure to this serotype. In contrast, the seroprevalences of EHV-1 between captive and wild groups was not significantly different. The seroprevalence of EHV-9 was not significantly higher than EHV-1 in zebras within the wild Kenyan population.

The family Herpesviridae is classified into three subfamilies Alpha-, Beta-, and Gammaherpesvirinae. In equids, nine equid herpesviruses (EHVs) have been classified to date, of which EHV-1, EHV-3, EHV-4, EHV-8, and EHV-9 belong to the genus Varicellovirus of the subfamily Alphaherpesvirinae (Davison et al. 2009). Highly contagious, EHV-1 is usually transmitted by direct contact, mainly through infected nasal discharge. It can result in respiratory disease, abortion, neonatal death, and equine herpesvirus myeloencephalopathy (Ma et al. 2013). Herpesviruses are generally considered to be species-specific, but EHV-1 and EHV-9 differ in their ability to infect multiple species (Abdelgawad et al. 2016). Nonetheless, EHV-1 is a general pathogen of horses and other equids, whereas EHV-9 is prevalent in wild equids. The EHV-9 isolate shares over 95% sequence similarity with EHV-1, making the viruses difficult to distinguish, particularly serologically (Rebelo et al. 2015).

The prevalence of antibodies against EHV-1 and EHV-4 in wild zebras was first described by Barnard and coworkers in Burchell's zebras (Equus burchellii) in Kruger National Park (Barnard and Paweska 1993). A year later, antibodies against EHV-1, EHV-2, and EHV-4 were described in wild mountain zebras (Equus zebra) in Namibia (Borchers and Frölich 1997). In 2005, the first report of seroprevalence of EHV-9 in wild zebras was described in a study of a migratory group of the same zebra species in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania (Borchers et al. 2005). The prevalence of EHV-9 antibodies was high and the species was therefore suggested to be a natural host.

Equid herpesvirus 9 is a relatively recently discovered herpesvirus previously called gazelle herpesvirus 1 because of its initial detection in 1993 in a herd of Thomson's gazelles (Eudorcas thomsonii) presenting with encephalitis in a zoological garden in Japan (Fukushi et al. 1997). Further analysis of the nucleotide sequences showed a genetic similarity to EHV-1, and it was later recognized as a new equine herpesvirus, EHV-9 (Yanai et al. 1998). The Thomson's gazelles involved in the outbreak in Japan shared pasture and a water source with zebras that were considered a possible source of the virus. Originally, the EHV-9 virus is thought to have evolved in Burchell's zebra (Greenwood et al. 2012), and EHV-9 glycoprotein B (gB)–specific sequences were found in the trigeminal ganglia of a Burchell's zebra from the Serengeti ecosystem (Borchers et al. 2008). The virus has a tropism for neuronal and respiratory tissue during experimental infections (Donovan et al. 2009). Virus experimentally inoculated intranasally in horses (Equus caballus) in Japan caused subclinical nonsuppurative encephalitis and pneumonia (Taniguchi et al. 1999). The virus has the ability to cause disease in at least eight additional mammalian taxa and is also believed to be a zoonotic pathogen (Schrenzel et al. 2008). A fatal meningoencephalitis, confirmed as being EHV-9–induced, occurred in a polar bear (Ursus maritimus) in San Diego, with zebras housed nearby implicated as possible reservoirs (Donovan et al. 2009).

A key property of the alphaherpesviruses is their ability to establish life-long latency in natural hosts, making elimination of herpesviruses almost impossible. Latency can be established in the neurons of the sensory ganglia or in lymphoid cells, giving the viruses an important epidemiologic advantage and allowing for evasion of the host immune system during the latent phase and establishment of persistent infection. After multiple types of stimulation, the virus can reactivate and be transmitted to susceptible hosts, which may occur with or without clinical disease (Abdelgawad et al. 2016).

Grévy's zebras (Equus grevyi) live in arid and semiarid grasslands and shrublands in Kenya and Ethiopia. The Grévy's zebra population has been reduced from an estimated population size of 5,800 individuals in the 1980s to a current population of approximately 2,680 individuals in 2016, with the major part of the population in Kenya. Today the species is listed as endangered under criterion A2acd in the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List (Rubenstein et al. 2016).

Here, we report the seroprevalence of EHV-1 and EHV-9 in wild Grévy's zebras in Kenya and compare this with a recent comprehensive serologic study of 17 captive specimens of the same species (Abdelgawad et al. 2015).

Blood was collected from 32 wild Grévy's zebras (see Supplementary Material Table 1) in northern Kenya over a 4-yr period (2012–15). Eight free-ranging donkeys (Equus africanus asinus) sharing pasture with the zebras were also sampled for comparison. The research authorization committee at Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) Department of Veterinary and Capture Services approved the studies related to this publication. We followed KWS guidelines on wildlife veterinary practice (from 2006). And all KWS veterinarians complied with the Veterinary Surgeons and Veterinary Para-Professionals Act regulating veterinary practice in Kenya (Kenya Veterinary Board 2011).

A previously described custom peptide-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using EHV-1-E (1E) and EHV-9-G (9G) peptides (Abdelgawad et al. 2015) was applied to detect and differentiate between EHV-1– and EHV-9–specific antibodies in serum samples obtained from different animal species. All statistical analyses were conducted with GraphPad Prism version 5.0a software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, USA). Specific EHV-1-E (1E) and EHV-9-G (9G) peptides were used to differentiate between EHV-1 and EHV-9 antibodies in zebra and donkey serum samples. We used the same cutoff value used for zebra population in the Abdelgawad et al. (2015) study. Samples were considered positive when the optical density value was greater than 0.2 and 0.14 for EHV-1 and EHV-9, respectively. A total of 84% (27/32) of the Grévy's zebras we tested were positive for EHV-1 and 91% (29/32) were positive for EHV-9. All eight donkeys were positive to both EHV-1 and EHV-9 (see Supplementary Material Fig. 1a, b), showing possible co-adaptation to the virus. All Grévy's zebra specimens (WZ-20–WZ-24) seronegative in total were sampled in the same geographic region within Ol Pejeta Conservancy (0°0′15″S, 36°57′49″E), Kenya. However, two animals from this region were seropositive (WZ-20 and WZ-21) to EHV-9. Further sampling in this region would be required to determine whether it has an unusually low EHV prevalence. None of the sampled individuals showed any clinical sign of herpesvirus-related disease at the time of sampling.

Figure 1. 

Comparative seroprevalences of equid herpesviruses types 1 (EHV-1) and 9 (EHV-9) in wild and captive Grévy's zebras (Equus grevyi), Kenya, sampled during a 4-yr period (2012–15) and tested with a peptide-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. (a) The seroprevalence of EHV-9 antibodies in wild Grévy's zebras was significantly higher (P=0.001, Fisher's exact test) than in captive Grévy's zebras. (b) The seroprevalence of EHV-1 antibodies was not significantly higher (P=0.156, Fisher's exact test) in wild than in captive Grévy's zebras. (c) The seroprevalence of EHV-9 antibodies is not significantly higher (P=0.707, Fisher's exact test) than EHV-1 antibodies in wild Grévy's zebras.


We compared the prevalence of EHV-1 and EHV-9 antibodies among the wild Grévy's zebras in the current study and captive Grévy's zebras tested in a previous study (Abdelgawad et al. 2015). The analysis showed a significant difference (P=0.001, Fisher's exact test) in the prevalence of EHV-9 antibodies, with a higher prevalence in the wild Grévy's zebras compared with the captive zebras (Fig. 1a). By contrast, EHV-1 antibody seroprevalence between the wild and captive Grévy's zebras was not significantly different (P=0.156, Fisher's exact test; Fig. 1b). Within the Kenyan wild Grévy's zebra population tested in this study, analysis by Fisher's exact tests showed that the antibody prevalence against EHV-1 was not significantly different from that of EHV-9 antibodies (P=0.707; Fig. 1c). Although we could discriminate EHV-9–positive serum samples from EHV-1–positive samples, serologic analysis is limited to antibody detection and does not provide viral sequence information or information regarding the existence of possible recombination between the two viruses. Further molecular analysis will be needed to provide more details about viral strain diversity and possible recombination events.

In Kenya, the national conservation strategies for the Grévy's zebra involve monitoring species distribution, behavioral ecology, and diseases. Our serologic analysis was done to determine the prevalence of EHV-1 and EHV-9 in the highly endangered Grévy's zebra population in Kenya and to compare the results with captive specimens of the same species. Both EHV-1 and EHV-9 were highly prevalent in the wild population, with a significantly higher prevalence of EHV-9 in the wild population relative to the captive study group. This observation suggests that both groups have been exposed to both viruses, but to varying degrees. Possible explanations for the higher seroprevalence in wild animals include longer latency in the captive animals and more frequent shedding of virus in the wild ones. Stressors in the wild that cause herpesvirus to exit latency possibly are absent or reduced in captivity (e.g., predation stress). Previous studies have shown high seroprevalence in wild Burchell's and mountain zebras, the former often sharing pasture with Grévy's zebras. The results suggest all zebra species were either exposed to herpesvirus in a common ancestor or that cross-species transmission among equids occurred after they evolved from a common ancestor.

Disease is an underestimated threat to the survival of wildlife populations. Especially in small remaining populations of endangered species like the Grévy's zebra, susceptibility to disease could be a serious threat and should be monitored with regular surveillance. The presence of a viral antigen or nucleic acid was not tested in this study, and further studies to define levels of viral load should be performed in future analyses.


We thank Kolmarden Fundraising Foundation, Sweden, for the funds for collaring activities of the Grévy's zebras in Kenya and making sampling possible. The Marwell foundation and Leibniz-Gemeinschaft, SAW-2015-IZW-1440, are thanked for covering the sample shipping costs. The International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, covered the costs for permits and performed the laboratory analysis. Thanks to Mats Amundin, Kolmarden Zoo, for helpful support during the writing process.


Supplementary material for this article is online at



Abdelgawad A, Damiani A, Ho SYW, Strauss G, Szentics CA, East ML, Osterreider N, Greenwood AD. 2016. Zebra alphaherpesviruses (EHV-1 and EHV-9): Genetic diversity, latency and co-infections. Viruses 8:262. Google Scholar


Abdelgawad A, Hermes R, Damiani A, Lamglait B, Czirják GÁ, East M, Aschenborn O, Wenker C, Kasem S, Osterreider N, et al. 2015. Comprehensive serology based on a peptide ELISA to assess the prevalence of closely related equine herpesviruses in zoo and wild animals. PLoS One 10:e0138370. Google Scholar


Barnard BJH, Paweska J. 1993. Prevalence of antibodies against some equine viruses in zebra in the Kruger National Park. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 60:175–179. Google Scholar


Borchers K, Frölich K. 1997. Antibodies against equine herpesviruses in free-ranging mountain zebras from Namibia. J Wildl Dis 33:812–817. Google Scholar


Borchers K, Lieckfeldt D, Ludwig A, Fukushi H, Allen G, Fyumagwa R, Hoare R. 2008. Detection of equid herpesvirus 9 DNA in the trigeminal ganglia of a Burchell's zebra from the Serengeti ecosystem. J Vet Med Sci 70:1377–1381. Google Scholar


Borchers K, Wiik H, Frölich K, Ludwig H, East ML. 2005. Antibodies against equine herpesviruses and equine arteritis in Burchell's zebras (Equus burchelli) from the Serengeti ecosystem. J Wildl Dis 41:80–86. Google Scholar


Davison AJ, Eberle R, Ehlers B, Hayward GS, McGeoch DJ, Minson AC, Pellet PE, Roizman B, Studdert MJ, Thiry E. 2009. The order Herpesvirales. Arch Virol 154:171–177. Google Scholar


Donovan TA, Schrenzel MD, Tucker T, Pessier AP, Bieknese B, Busch MDM, Wise AG, Maes R, Kiupel M, McKnight C, et al. 2009. Meningoencephalitis in a polar bear caused by equine herpesvirus 9 (EHV-9). Vet Pathol 46:1138–1143. Google Scholar


Fukushi H, Tomita T, Taniguchi A, Ochiai Y, Kirisawa R, Matasumura T, Yanai T, Masegi T, Yamaguchi T, Hirai K. 1997. Gazelle herpesvirus 1: A new neurotropic herpesvirus immunologically related to equine herpesvirus 1. Virology 227:34–44. Google Scholar


Greenwood A, Tsangaras K, Ho SYW, Szentics CA, Nikolin VM, Ma G, Damiani A, East ML, Lawrenz A, Hofer H, et al. 2012. A potentially fatal mix of herpes in zoos. Curr Biol 22:1727–1731. Google Scholar


Kenya Veterinary Board. 2011. The Veterinary Surgeons and Veterinary Para-Professional Act, 2011. Accessed May 2018. Google Scholar


Ma G, Azab W, Osterreider N. 2013. Equine herpesviruses type 1 (EHV-1) and 4 (EHV-4)—Masters of co-evolution and a constant threat to equids and beyond. Vet Microbiol 167:123–134. Google Scholar


Rebelo AR, Carman S, Shapiro J, Van Dreumel T, Hazlett M, Nagy É. 2015. Equid herpesvirus 9 (EHV-9) isolates from zebras in Ontario, Canada, 1989 to 2007. Can J Vet Res 79:155–159. Google Scholar


Rubenstein D, Low Mackey B, Davidson ZD, Kebede F, King SRB . 2016. Equus grevyi. In:The International Union for Conservation of Nature red list of threatened species. Accessed September 2017. Google Scholar


Schrenzel MD, Tucker TA, Donovan TA, Busch MDM, Wise AG, Maes RK, Kiupel M. 2008. New hosts for equine herpesvirus 9. Emerg Infect Dis 14:1616–1619. Google Scholar


Taniguchi A, Fukushi H, Matsumura T, Yanai T, Masegi T, Hirai K. 1999. Pathogenicity of a new neurotrophic herpesvirus 9 (gazelle herpesvirus 1) in horses. J Vet Med Sci 62:215–218. Google Scholar


Yanai T, Sakai T, Fukushi H, Hirai K, Narita M, Sakai H, Masegi T. 1998. Neuropathological study of gazelle herpesvirus 1 (equine herpesvirus 9) infection in Thomson's gazelles (Gazella thomsoni). J Comp Pathol 119:159–168. Google Scholar
© Wildlife Disease Association 2018
Louise Guevara, Azza Abdelgawad, Cynthia Onzere, Alex D. Greenwood, Zeke Davidson, Richard Bishop, and Mathew Mutinda "Seroprevalence of Equine Herpesviruses 1 and 9 (EHV-1 and EHV-9) in Wild Grévy's Zebra (Equus grevyi) in Kenya," Journal of Wildlife Diseases 54(4), 848-851, (1 October 2018).
Received: 3 January 2018; Accepted: 3 March 2018; Published: 1 October 2018
Grévy's zebra
Back to Top