Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
6 March 2024 A NOTE ON NON-BINARY STROBILI IN PINUS JEFFREYI, A RARE PHENOMENON IN WILDLANDS
Nancy E. Grulke, Karl D. Marrett
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The occurrence of non-binary strobili (N-BS) in gymnosperms is of interest to understanding the origins of flowering in angiosperms. One case of non-binary strobili with distal ovulate bracts was discovered during ∼50,000 field observations of P. ponderosa Douglas ex Loudon. and P. jeffreyi A.Murray on 1100 trees over a 1500-km transect and a period of 20 years in western North America. The N-BS was observed once in mature P. jeffreyi during a year of above-average precipitation, with low tree-to-tree competition, moderate nitrogen deposition, and moderately high ozone exposure in Sequoia National Park, California. An updated, verified compendium of non-binary strobili is reported for the subfamily Pinoideae of Pinaceae.

The occurrence of single strobili with both pollen and ovule-bearing structures (non-binary strobili, NBS) in the subfamily Pinoideae of Pinaceae are rare, with 50 uniquely reported instances since 1838 (Cramer 1838 plate published in Masters 1869; Table 1). Nonetheless, Masters (1869) and Chamberlain (1935) have stated that most field-going botanists will have ‘certainly’ observed them, suggesting that the occurrence of N-BS is more common than reported. Early evolutionary botanists were interested in teratological features of strobili (Masters 1869; Penzig 1890; Masters 1889 as seen in Doak 1935) because developmental morphology and their variations suggested shared evolutionary origins with angiosperms. The capacity for N-BS is thought to have arisen prior to the angiosperm split from gymnosperms (ca. 300 million years ago), and its occurrence is now believed to be a retained, occasional feature (Frohlich 2006; Flores-Rentería et al. 2011). Interestingly, genetic (chloroplast DNA linked to microsporangia, mitochondrial DNA linked to megasporangia, and nuclear DNA contributed by both; X. Q. Wang et al. 2000), and transcriptomic analyses (Ran et al. 2018) support the classic morphological divisions of Pinaceae in which Pinus, Cathaya, Picea, Pseudotsuga and Larix are grouped into the pinoid clade. Of these genera, Pinus and Picea have the greatest number of reported N-BS occurrences, and Abies, Pseudotsuga, Tsuga, and Larix the least. Hybridization appears to increase N-BS occurrence (Mergen 1963) but is not discussed further here.

Table 1.

Occurrences of Non-manipulated, Non-binary Strobili in Pinoideae of Pinaceae. Instances of non-binary strobili occurring in hybrids or in response to hormonal manipulation have not been included. The species names have been reported based on the modern authority according to the EPPO Global Database, and footnotes indicate species as reported in the article. When information was not clearly reported, a “n/i” is indicated. Species' name as cited in reference, cross-referenced with EPPO Global Database:1 Larix europaea; 2 cannot substantiate occurrence; 3 Larix leptolepis; 4 Larix macrocarpa; 5 Abies excelsa; Picea excelsa; 6 Picea excelsa; 7 Abies excelsa; 8 Pinus montigena; 9 Pinus morinda; 10 Pinus tonyosho; 11 Pinus cubensis (Mohr); Pinus heterophylla (Jack), both authors reported Mellichamps' field observation; 12 Pinus montana; 13 Pinus laricio; 14 Pinus maritima; 15 Pseudotsuga douglasii; 16 Pseudotsuga taxifolia. Additional notes: a observations of Tsuga carolinana and T. dumosa reported as seen in Rudall et al. 2011, but the data for years of observation and the number of trees was supplied for both species from Ruddall, Royal Botanic Gardens, personal communication.

img-z2-2_172.gif

Table 1.

Continued

img-z3-2_172.gif

Bisporangiate cones in gymnosperms were first mentioned in Dickson (1860); morphological and developmental investigations of these structures over the next 75 years led to a proposed evolutionary ranking of gymnosperms (summarized in Chamberlain 1935). This approach (structure and development) in subsequent investigations led to the understanding that megasporangia develop from modified, terminal (subterminal) long shoots, and microsporangia develop from lateral needle primordia (short shoots) borne in the axils of needles (Tosh and Powell 1986; D. Y. Wang et al. 2000; Rudall et al. 2011). The occurrence, variability, plasticity, and viability (Flores-Rentería et al. 2011) of N-BS structures and their development in gymnosperms still holds interest.

Bisporangiate reproductive structures in fossils predating angiosperms are believed to support the hypothesis of angiosperm flower evolution in a common ancestor shared by both gymnosperms and angiosperms. Doyle (2008) combined morphological, molecular, and fossil evidence, to conclude that the relationships among gymnosperms (glossopterids, Pentoxylon, Bennettitales, and Caytonia) and angiosperms are supported. However, the combination of stamens and carpels in a single structure may have arisen independently in Bennettitales. Accepting the molecular evidence, the morphological similarities of Pentoxylon and Caytonia may have arisen independently.

With some exceptions, there is temporal and spatial separation of female and male strobili. Male strobili dominate in young trees, while female strobili predominate in upper branches and male in mid-crown (summarized in Tosh and Powell 1986; Caron and Powell 1990; Theissen and Becker 2004). Within a branch, female strobili are distal, and male are proximal (as in Agathis; Lanner 1966a). Teratological (or plastic) features suggest a historical and potential capacity for strobili to evolve. Hormonal or nutritional manipulation to obtain N-BS is of interest to silviculturists for the potential to increase and or promote earlier seed production in trees (Dormán 1976; Ross and Pharis 1986).

In general, megasporangia are distal and microsporangia are proximal in N-BS, similar to the arrangement in angiosperm flowers (Flores-Rentería et al. 2011). However, the reverse configuration has been reported in Larix (Chamberlain 1935; Pauley 1942; Table 1). In bisporangiate strobili, a neutral zone may be present between the two genders, such as that found in Larix kaempferi (Lamb.) Carrière (Momose 1961), Picea abies (L.) H.Karst (Stenzel 1876), Pinus densiflora Siebold & Zucc. (Doak 1935), and Tsuga canadensis L.Carrière (Holmes 1932). Transitional structures may also occur in the neutral zone such as in Picea abies (referred to as Abies excelsea; Dickson 1860), L. europaea DC. (Bartlett 1913), Larix occidentalis Nutt. (Kirkwood 1916), Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco (referred to as Pinus taxifolia; Littlefield 1931), and L. laricina (DuRoi) K.Koch (Caron and Powell 1990).

N-BS occurrence may be associated with environmental stresses such as drought (Doak 1935; Zobel 1952; Black 1961), excess nitrogen (Meehan 1869; Fujii 1892; Doak 1935; Eis 1970), geographically marginal distributions (Fisher 1905; Doak 1935; Masters 1869; Elliot 1979), and in arboretum plantings outside of their natural range (Masters 1869; Pinus montana Mill., Steil 1918; Zobel 1952). Megasporangia are promoted in trees of high vigor and preferentially on higher-vigor branches (Remphrey and Powell 1984), although teratological features were also observed on a low-vigor specimen of Pinus contorta (Douglas ex Louden) (Black 1961). Hormonal applications (cytokinins, Wakushima et al. 1997; gibberellins, Owens et al. 1990) also influence the occurrence of N-BS in Pinaceae species were not considered further here.

Here we report the first N-BS observation in Pinus jeffreyi A.Murray, in the Pinus subsect. Sabinianae (Willyard et al., 2021). The species is largely centered in the eastern Sierra Nevada, but extends to the western slope of the Sierra Nevada at mid to higher elevations (5500–7500 m; Fites-Kaufman et al. 2007), north into central Lake County in Oregon east of the Cascades (Grulke unpublished data), and south in the Peninsular Range to San Pedro Martir National Park, Baja Norte, Mexico. The intent of the retrospective bibliographic survey was in part to verify and identify unique reports of N-BS in the subfamily Pinoideae, to compare occurrences of the phenomenon, in wildlands vs. altered environments, and to explore the roles of extreme drought and nutritional amendments in promoting its expression.

Methods

Location

The branchlet, with attached bisexual strobili, was collected in a mature, open-grown P. jeffreyi, in a dry pine-dominated woodland in Sequoia National Park, CA, near Crescent Meadow (36°33′16″N, 118°45′21″W, 2061 m) in 2006 by K. D. Marrett. Measurements of the strobili were made with a digital micrometer (to the nearest 0.01 mm). The voucher specimen was deposited and is retained in the Sequoia National Park herbarium, in Three Rivers, CA.

Sampling

The collection was made as part of a survey where the 3rd, 4th, or 5th secondary branchlet (2nd order) proximal to a primary branch terminus was sampled (no further back than one quarter of the distal end of the branch) in mid crown (11–13 m) of mature P. jeffreyi and Pinus ponderosa. These branchlets were sampled for another purpose: to assess tree crown vigor and drought stress level (e.g., needle retention, branchlet diameter, branch and needle elongation relative to the longest observed growth on the branchlet, needle color and condition, and presence of insects and pathogens; Grulke et al. 2020a). The observation of NBS was within the context of 20 years of field observations of Pinus jeffreyi and P. ponderosa P. Lawson & C. Lawson var. ponderosa across a 750-km latitudinal gradient in four mountain ranges - southern Cascades Mountains, eastern and western slope of the Sierra Nevada, Transverse Range of southern California, and the Peninsular Range in southern California and its extension into Baja Norte, Mexico (San Pedro Martir Mountains) (Fig. 1). In all, approximately 51,000 observations of 1100 trees of the two species were made (Table 2).

Fig. 1.

Location of observations in western North America, listed in Table 2. Base map modified from Jenkinson's (1990) distribution map of P. jeffreyi. The coastal length of Oregon is 474 km.

img-z5-1_172.jpg

Table 2.

Locations of pinus jeffreyi (pj) and p. ponderosa (pp) observed in this study. ‘NF’ refers to USDA National Forest; ‘NP’ refers to USDI National Park.

img-z6-2_172.gif

Assembly of Observations

To construct Table 1, all unique, verifiable observations of N-BS were searched for until no additional references were discovered. The following sources were searched: Google Scholar, TreeSearch, USDA Forest Service Library, Boyce Thompson Institute Library, Harvard Library, University of Idaho Library, National Agriculture Library, and HathiTrust digital library. An extensive search was made in Google Scholar. Key words included: androgynous, bisexual, bisporangiate, hermaphroditic, teratological, abnormal, and ‘monstrous’ cone. The latter term was common in publications prior to 1900; but often this term denoted proliferated cones, unusual growth patterns (e.g., tissue adherence of multiple unisporangiate strobili), or an unusual abundance or locations of unisporangiate strobili. Species names and authorities were listed according to the International Plant Names Index. The EPPO Global Database was used to cross reference older to more modern nomenclature.

In several publications older than 1875, a reference listed nothing to do with N-BS. For example, Masters (1869) and subsequent authors cite N-BS reported by von Mohl, Schleiden, and A. Braun (1853) in Flora Volume 5. However, the article was found and on that page is an argument presented against a colleague by a Dr. Walpers with no reference to N-BS. It is possible that the year, volume number, or page number was incorrect; however, a search of a 2 years before and after publication in this journal still did not yield the reported observation of N-BS. In some cases, the same observation was repeated as a new observation by different authors; we reported the first publication that could be verified. For example, N-BS in Pinus elliotii Engelm. observed by Melchamps was reported in a letter to Jack (1895), who quoted the letter in his publication. A second publication of N-BS in the same species (Christ 1895) was identified as the same observation by Jack (1895). Dormán (1976) published a photo of an occurrence of N-BS in Pinus taeda L. attributed to Zobel and Goddard (1954), but as the latter authors did not identify it as such, so it was attributed to Dormán (1976); the photo was the same. Bencat (1960, in Czech) reported a N-BS occurrence in Pinus mugo Turra, cited in Giertych 1960 (in Polish), but there were no photos of the occurrence and the nuances of the Czech observation could not be verified by a Russian language expert. An observation of N-BS in Picea abies (L.) H. Karst by Flandung et al. in 1999 (as reported in Theissen and Becker 2004) was not included because the book containing the original could not be obtained to verify. Fujii (1892) and Matzuda (1892) are both cited as observing N-BS in Pinus thunbergii Parl. in the literature (e.g., Atkinson 1897), but are believed to be the same observation (same year, same location). Only Matzuda's publication (in Japanese) is cited in the table because a plate labeled with the species name in Latin is included in his publication. A report of N-BS in Pinus palustris Mill. described by Dormán 1976 (Pg. 33, Fig. 23) showed terminal strobili (subtending next year's bud) with distal staminate flowers and a swelling above, but no differentiated ovules. The location of two observations is marked as ‘assumed’ (Larix decidua Mill.; Pinus densiflora (Siebold & Zucc.; Doak 1935) because the author was employed by Texas A&M before, after, and at the time of observation, and other observations reported in the same publication cite ‘Stations in Texas’ and ‘College Station, Texas.’

Results

One non-binary strobilus was observed on one branch, in one year, on the southern exposure in the upper mid-crown of mature P. jeffreyi. Similar branch samples had been taken on this tree for the previous 8 years, and subsequently for the following 11 years, without an additional N-BS observation. The N-BS differentiated in 2006, which was not a drought year in Sequoia National Park (Kim et al. 2022).

The total length of the strobilus was 38 mm, with the distal female portion 12 mm long and the proximal male portion 14 mm long (Fig. 2). The diameter at the base of the male portion was 14.5 mm and was thicker (7.3 mm) relative to a wholly male strobilus, similar to that reported in Dickson (1860) and others. The stem was 12 mm in length and 6.2 mm diameter at its base. The female portion was of the same developmental stage as fully megasporangiate cones. At the time of this report, no transitional forms between microsporophylls and leaves were found. No N-BS were observed in mature P. ponderosa. Proliferated seed cones were not observed in either species.

Fig. 2.

Branchlet with non-binary strobili in Jeffrey pine collected in Sequoia National Park. The total length of the strobili was 38 mm.

img-z7-5_172.jpg

Discussion

Flores-Renterìa et al. (2011) and others have suggested that N-BS are seen and noted more frequently in plantations, parks, domestic plantings, or on the margins of the tree distributions, perhaps because they are more frequently observed in those locations. They posit that trees in these locations may have access to greater or lesser nutrition or experience other types of stress than in their native habitat, and thus N-BS may occur more frequently. In plantations, N-BS are rare (e.g., ∼0.5% in Picea mariana Du Roi, Caron, and Powell 1990); in our study, NBS of P. jeffreyi in wildlands is rarer (ca. 0.00002%). However, outplanting of plantation-produced seeds may have undesirable outcomes, such as fewer seeds produced on N-BS (Doak 1935; Dormán 1976).

The N-BS in mature P. jeffreyi was collected at a site that experienced moderately high nitrogen deposition (Fenn et al. 2003) in a National Park. However, other sites sampled and reported here have much higher nitrogen deposition, such as Crestline and Strawberry Peak in the San Bernardino Mountains (Grulke et al. 1998; Fenn et al. 2003), but with no observations of N-BS. Drought has been suggested as an elicitor of N-BS; however, it was not a particularly dry or hot year during bud differentiation (2005) in Sequoia National Park (Kim et al. 2022), and many trees experienced greater physiological drought stress at other sites in this Park (Lodgepole, Table 2; Grulke et al. 2003; Grulke et al. 2020b), and outside the Park (Barton Flats, San Bernardino Mountains [Grulke 1999]; Sycan Preserve in south central Oregon [Grulke et al., 2020b]; and San Pedro Matir National Park, MX [Grulke 2010]). No other occurrence of N-BS was observed in P. jeffreyi, and no occurrence was observed in P. ponderosa. An unexplored environmental stress is the effect of toxins aerially transported into Sequoia National Park from upwind agricultural fields in the California Central Valley (Jovan and McCune 2006).

Caron and Powell (1990) posit that environmental stress was not likely to have a role in the occurrence of N-BS in Picea mariana. They suggest that “the mechanisms controlling gender differentiation on some trees may be weakly separated when strobilus bearing starts.” In young plantation-grown Larix laricina, N-BS occurred repeatedly (Tosh and Powell 1986) but did not appear to differ among the three years of observation. Our observation suggests that N-BS may develop at any tree age, albeit rarely. Flores-Rentería et al. (2011) argue that perhaps the occurrence of N-BS is not teratological, but instead should be considered an ancient, albeit occasional, retained trait.

Acknowledgments

We thank A. Esperanza (NPS) for providing logistical support while working in Sequoia National Park. We also thank M. J. Marrett for field support at many of the sites. Many thanks to M. A. Goelst for translation of German and French texts.

The field work was supported by Man and the Biosphere in 1991; the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (DW 12934530) in 1994–1997; joint U.S. EPA and National Park Service funding (PRIMENET, PMIS #119202) from 1998 to 2002; the Kosciuszko Foundation, New York, NY in 2000; NIFA 2007-35101-18144 from 2007 to 2011; and the Western Wildlands Environmental Threats Assessment Center (U.S. Department of Agriculture, USFS) from 2010 to 2019.

Any use of product names was for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. This manuscript was prepared while the first author was employed at the U.S. Forest Service (Retired from USFS Dec 31, 2022), who is currently an emeritus research ecologist with the USFS.

Literature Cited

1.

Atkinson, G. F. 1897. Experimental morphology. Science 6:538–550. Google Scholar

2.

Bartlett, A. Q. 1913. Note on the occurrence of abnormal bisporangiate cones of Larix europea. Annals of Botany 27:575–576. Google Scholar

3.

Black, T. M. 1961. Abnormalities of the reproductive system of Pinus contorta Loudon. Annals of Botany 25:21–28. Google Scholar

4.

Caron, G. E. and G. R. Powell. 1990. Morphological variation, frequency, and distribution of bisporangiate strobili in Picea mariana. Canadian Journal of Botany 68:1826–1830. Google Scholar

5.

Chamberlain, C. J. 1935. Gymnosperms, structure and evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Google Scholar

6.

Chandler, C. 1959. Bisporangiate cones in larch. Boyce Thompson Institute Contributions 20:107–110. Google Scholar

7.

Coulter, J. M. and C. J. Chamberlain. 1910. Morphology of gymnosperms. University Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Google Scholar

8.

Dickson, A. 1860. II. Observations on some bisexual cones occurring in the spruce fir (Abies excelsa). Transactions, Botanical Society of Edinburgh 6:418–423. Google Scholar

9.

Doak, C. C. 1935. Evolution of foliar types, dwarf shoots, and cone scale of Pinus. University of Illinois Bulletin 32:35–103. Google Scholar

10.

Dormán, K. W. 1976. The genetics and breeding of southern pines. Agriculture Handbook No. 471. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar

11.

Doyle, J. A. 2008. Integrating molecular phylogenetic and paleobotanical evidence on origin of the flower. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169:816–843. Google Scholar

12.

Eis S. 1970. Reproduction and reproductive irregularities of Abies lasiocarpa and A. grandis. Canadian Journal of Botany 48:141–143. Google Scholar

13.

Elliot, D. L. 1979. The occurrence of bisexual strobiles on black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.) in the forest-tundra ecotone: Keewatin, Northwest Territories. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 9:284–286. Google Scholar

14.

European And Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (Eppo) Global Database. European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization, Paris, France. Website  https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/ [accessed 02 December 2022]. Google Scholar

15.

Fenn, M. E., J. S. Baron, E. B. Allen, H. M. Rueth, K. R. Nydick, L. Geiser, W. D. Bowman, J. O. Sickman, T, Meixner, D. W. Johnson, and P. Neitlich. 2003. Ecological effects of nitrogen deposition in the western United States. BioScience 53:404–420. Google Scholar

16.

Fisher, W. 1905. An abnormal cone of Pinus laricio. The Ohio Naturalist 6:396–397. Google Scholar

17.

Fites-Kaufman, J. A., Rundel, P., Stephenson, N., and D. A. Weixelman. 2007. Chapter 17: Pp. 456–501 in M. Barbour, T. Keeler-Wolf, and A. A. Schoenherr, (eds), Terrestrial vegetation of California, 3rd Ed., University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. Google Scholar

18.

Flores-Rentería, L., A. Vázquez-Lobo, A.V. Whipple, D. Piñero, J. Márquez-Guzman, C.A. Domínguez. 2011. Functional bisporangiate cones in Pinus johannis (Pinaceae): implications for the evolution of bisexuality in seed plants. American Journal of Botany 98:130–139. Google Scholar

19.

Frohlich, M. W. 2006. Recent developments regarding the evolutionary origin of flowers. Pp. 63–127 in D. E. Soltis, J. Leebens-Mack, and P. S. Soltis. (eds), Developmental genetics of the flower. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. Google Scholar

20.

Fujii, K. 1895. Physiological researches [sic] on the sexuality of the flowers of Pinus densiflora Sieb. et Zucc. Shokubusugaku Zasshi 9:271–274. Google Scholar

21.

Giertych, M. 1960. Rozmnazanie _ generatywne. Pp. 269–294 inZarys Fizjologii Sosny Zwyczajnej  https://rcin.org.pl/Content/204644/PDF/KOR001_220832_Zarysfiz-rozm-gen.pdf[accessed 03 October 2022]. Google Scholar

22.

Goebel, K. 1905. Organography of plants, especially of the Archegoniatae and Spermatophyta. English Translation, Part 2. Clarendon Press, New York, NY. Google Scholar

23.

Grulke, N. E. 1999. Physiological responses of ponderosa pine to gradients of environmental stressors. Pp. 126–163 in P. R. Miller, and J. R. Mcbride (eds), Oxidant air pollution impacts in the montane forests of southern California. Ecological Studies, Vol. 134. Springer New York, New York. Google Scholar

24.

Grulke, N. E., R. Johnson, A. Esperanza, D. Jones, T. Nguyen, S. Posch, and M. Tausz. 2003. Canopy transpiration of Jeffrey pine in mesic and xeric microsites: O3 uptake and injury response. TREES 17:292–298. Google Scholar

25.

Grulke, N. E. 2010. Plasticity in physiological traits in conifers: implications for response to climate change in the western U.S. Environmental Pollution 158:2032–2042. Google Scholar

26.

Grulke, N. E., C. P. Andersen, M. P. Fenn, and P. R. Miller. 1998. Ozone exposure and N deposition reduces root biomass in ponderosa pine across the San Bernardino Mountains, California. Environmental Pollution 103:63–73. Google Scholar

27.

Grulke, N. E., C. Bienz, K. Hrinkevich, J. Maxfield, and K. Uyeda. 2020b. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to assess effectiveness of forest treatments in improving stand health in dry pine forests. Forest Ecology and Management 465:118085. Google Scholar

28.

Grulke, N. E., J. Maxfield, P. J. Riggan, C. Schraderpatton, and K. Uyeda. 2020a. Pre-emptive, remote detection of mature pine drought stress. Remote Sensing 12:2338. Google Scholar

29.

Ho, R. H. 1984. Seed-cone receptivity and seed production potential in white spruce. Forest Ecology and Management 9:161–171. Google Scholar

30.

Holmes, S. 1932 A bisporangiate cone of Tsuga canadensis. Botanical Gazette 43:100–102. Google Scholar

31.

International Plant Names Index. 2022. The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Harvard University Herbaria & Libraries and Australian National Herbarium. Website  https://www.ipni.org/ [accessed 02 December 2022]. Google Scholar

32.

Jack, J. G. 1895. Some unusual androgynous flower-clusters. Garden and Forest 380:222–223. Google Scholar

33.

Jenkinson, J. L. 1990. Pinus jeffreyi Grev. & Balf. Pp. 360 in R. M. Burns and B. H. Honkala (eds), Silvics of North America, Vol. 1, Conifers. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Agriculture handbook 654, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar

34.

Jovan, S. and B. Mccune. 2006. Using epiphytic microlichen communities for biomonitoring ammonia in forests of the greater Sierra Nevada, California. Water, Air, Soil Pollution 170:69–93. Google Scholar

35.

Kim, Y., N. E. Grulke, A. Merschel, and K. Uyeda. 2022. Assessment of drought index performance in the southern Sierra Nevada. Climate 10:72. Google Scholar

36.

Kirkwood, J. F. 1916. Bisporangiate cones of Larix. Botanical Gazette 3:256. Google Scholar

37.

Kwon, S. H., Y. G. Kim, H. I. Kang, D. Shim, and K. S. Kang. 2021. Morphological of strobili at different development positions and cone and seed characteristics of Pinus densiflora f. multicaulis. Dendrobiology 85:51–59. Google Scholar

38.

Lanner, R. M. 1966a. An unusual bisexual Agathis cone. Pacific Science 20:382–383. Google Scholar

39.

Lanner, R. M. 1966b. The phenology and growth habits of pines in Hawaii. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Berkeley, CA, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experimental Forest, Research Paper PSW-29:1–25. Pg. 11. Google Scholar

40.

Littlefield, E. W. 1931. Bisporangiate inflorescences in Pseudotsuga. Ohio Journal of Science 31:416–417. Google Scholar

41.

Masters, M. T. 1869. Vegetable teratology: an account of the principal deviations from the usual construction of plants. Ray Society, London, UK. Google Scholar

42.

Masters, M. T. 1889. Review of some points in the comparative morphology, anatomy and life-history of the Coniferae. Journal of the Linnean Society of Botany 27:226–332. As seen in Doak, 1935. Google Scholar

43.

Matziris, D. 2002. Short Note: Hermaphrodism in black pine. Silvae Genetica 51:2–3. Google Scholar

44.

Matzuda, S. 1892. Bisexual cones of Pinus thunbergii. Botanical Magazine, Tokyo 6:238–239. Google Scholar

45.

Meehan, T. 1869. Sexual law in the Coniferae. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 121. Google Scholar

46.

Mergen, F. 1963. Sex transformation in pine hybrids. Forest Science 9:258–262. Google Scholar

47.

Momose, Y. 1961. Bisporangiate cones in Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi SARG). Journal of the Japanese Forestry Society 43:356. Google Scholar

48.

Owens, J. N., V. Hardev, and J. E. Eckenwalder. 1990. Sex expression in gymnosperms. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 4:281–294. Google Scholar

49.

Pauley, S. 1942. A bisexual cone of white spruce. Journal of Forestry 40:62–63. Google Scholar

50.

Penzig, O. 1890. Pflanzen-Teratologie Systematisch Geordnet. Genua: Druck von Angelo Ciminago. Vol. I, Pp. 34, 46, 65, 101, 125, 164, 175; 568pp. Vol. 2, Pp. 490–493. Google Scholar

51.

Ran, J.-H., Shen, T. T., Wu, H, Gong, X., Wang, XQ. 2018. Bisporangiate phylogeny and evolutionary history of Pinaceae updated by transcriptomic analysis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 129: 106–116. Google Scholar

52.

Rao, L. N. 1931. Bisporangiate cones of Pinus longifolia and Picea morinda. The Journal of Indian Botanical Society 10: 232–236. Google Scholar

53.

Remphrey, W. R. and G. R. Powell. 1984. Crown architecture of Larix laricina saplings: shoot preformation and neoformation and their relationships to shoot vigor. Canadian Journal of Botany 62:2181–2192. Google Scholar

54.

Righter, F. I. 1932. Bisexual flowers among pines. Journal of Forestry 30:873. Google Scholar

55.

Ross, S. D. and R. P. Pharis. 1986. Control of sex expression in conifers. Pp. 37–60, in S. V. Kossuth and S. D. Ross (eds), Hormonal Control of Tree Growth. Forestry Sciences, Vol. 28. Springer, Dordrecht, Germany. Google Scholar

56.

Ruark, H. E. and R. W. Jones. 1966. Research in forest genetics and tree breeding: A report of progress in tree improvement for Georgia, 1954–1965. Georgia Forest Research Council Report No. 17. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Northeastern Forest Experimental Station, Philadelphia, PA. Google Scholar

57.

Rudall, P. J., J. Hilton, F. Vergara-Silva, and R. M. Bateman. 2011. Recurrent abnormalities in conifer cones and the evolutionary origins of flower-like structures. Trends in Plant Science 16:151–159. Google Scholar

58.

Santamour, F. S. 1959. Bisexual conelets in spruce. Morris Arboretum Bulletin 10:10–11. Google Scholar

59.

Steil, W. N. 1918. Bisporangiate cones of Pinus montana. Botanical Gazette 66:68. Google Scholar

60.

Stenzel, G. 1876. Beobachtungen an durchwachsenen Fichtenzapfen: Ein Beitrag zur Morphologie der Nadelhölzer. Nova Acta der Ksl. Leop.-Carol. Deutschen Akademie der Naturforscher, Vol XXXVIII, Table 1 (p. 46) and Plate 12, Figs. 11–13. Google Scholar

61.

Tabor, A. C. 1990. Recurrent appearance of bisporangiate strobili with proliferation on Picea abies. Rhodora 92: 257–263. Google Scholar

62.

Theissen, G. and A. Becker. 2004. Gymnosperm orthologues of Class B floral homeotic genes and their impact on understanding flower origin. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 23:129–148. Google Scholar

63.

Tosh, K. J. and G. R. Powell. 1986. Proliferated, bisporangiate, and other atypical cones occurring on young, plantation grown Larix laricina. Canadian Journal of Botany 64:469–475. Google Scholar

64.

Wakushima, S., H. Yoshioka, and N. Sakurai. 1997. Promotion of lateral female strobili production in Pinus densiflora by cytokinin application at a specific stage. Journal of Forest Research 2:51–57. Google Scholar

65.

Wang, D. Y., D. R. Smith, H. Outred, R. E. Rowland, and D. W. Fountain. 2000. Male cone development and microsporogenesis in Pinus radiata. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 30:285–307. Google Scholar

66.

Wang, X. Q., D. C. Tank, and T. Sang. 2000. Phylogeny and divergence times in Pinaceae: evidence from three genomes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17:773–781. Google Scholar

67.

Weidlich, W. H. and J. A. Teeri. 1976. The occurrence of bisporangiate strobili in subalpine black spruce. Rhodora 78:6–16. Google Scholar

68.

Willyard, A., D. S. Gernandt, B. Cooper, C. Douglas, K. Finch, H. Karemera, E. Lindberg, S. K. Langer, J. Lefler, P. Marquardt, D. L. Pouncey, F. Telewski. 2021. Phylogenomics in the Hard Pines (Pinus subsection Ponderosae; Pinaceae) confirms paraphyly in Pinus ponderosa, and places Pinus jeffreyi with the California big cone pines. Systematic Botany 46:538–561. Google Scholar

69.

Zasada, J., F. J. Deneke, M. J. Foote, and R. H. Parkerson. 1978. Case history of an excellent white spruce cone and seed crop in interior Alaska: cone and seed production, germination, and seedling survival. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, OR. Google Scholar

70.

Zobel, B. J. 1952. Abnormal cone formation in pines. Texas Journal of Science 4:517–520. Google Scholar
Nancy E. Grulke and Karl D. Marrett "A NOTE ON NON-BINARY STROBILI IN PINUS JEFFREYI, A RARE PHENOMENON IN WILDLANDS," Madroño 70(3), 172-181, (6 March 2024). https://doi.org/10.3120/0024-9637-70.3.172
Published: 6 March 2024
KEYWORDS
androgynous
bisexual
bisporangiate
Cone
hermaphroditic
Pinus
teratological
Back to Top