Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
2 June 2021 Selection of the Young Coconut Mesocarp by the Sulawesi Babirusa (Babyrousa celebensis)
Masaaki Ito, Alastair A. Macdonald, Kristin Leus, Yamato Hasegawa, I Wayan Balik, I Wayan Gede Bandem Arimbawa, I Dewa Gede Agung Atmaja
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The feeding behaviours of the Sulawesi babirusa (Babyrousa celebensis) in terms of its preference to eat the mesocarp, or husk, of immature coconuts (Cocos nucifera) and the feeding marks on leftover coconuts were observed. Additionally, to explore the physicochemical factors behind this preference, a comparative study was conducted on the basal and apical parts of the coconut mesocarp. The breaking load, macronutrient content, and volatile compounds were examined. The findings were as follows: 1) Babirusas always sniffed the cut surface of the coconut before eating. They then scooped out the basal part of the mesocarp where the fibres are more visibly scarce with their mandibular incisors and ate more than 7.6 times the surface area at this end than at the apical end. 2) The preferred basal part of the immature mesocarp had a lower breaking load. 3) The gas chromatography-mass spectrophotometry (GC-MS) chromatogram of the basal sample showed larger peak areas for 2-methylbutanal and 3-methylbutanal. In conclusion, the babirusa preferred the basal part of the immature coconut mesocarp, and the preferred basal part had distinctive features in terms of hardness and volatile profile, which is probably characterised by the presence of 2-methylbutanal and 3-methylbutanal.

The babirusa (genus Babyrousa) is a wild pig endemic to Sulawesi and the neighbouring islands of Indonesia (Macdonald 1993, 2017). These animals primarily inhabit tropical rainforest on the banks of rivers and ponds and low-lying areas near coasts (Leus et al. 2016; Macdonald et al. 2016; Macdonald and Pattikawa 2017). Along the coastal areas and interior water courses of Indonesia, coconut palms (Cocos nucifera) are widely distributed. Historically, they have been planted by small-scale farmers for copra production.

In the Togian Archipelago of Central Sulawesi, some of the babirusa's range of distribution extends into agricultural areas including coconut groves. As a consequence, babirusas have come into conflict with the local Muslim farmers, particularly in vegetable gardens (Ito et al. 2005; Akbar et al. 2007; Ito et al. 2008). At the same time, the population trend of babirusas on the Togian islands is decreasing due to forest clearance and forest fires, illegal hunting, and predation by dogs (Macdonald et al. 2016; Ito and Melletti 2017).

A questionnaire conducted in 2007 revealed that local farmers' knowledge of the feeding habits and reproduction of the babirusa was limited (Ito et al. 2008; Ito and Melletti 2017). Although some babirusas have been observed to forage in coconut groves (Akbar et al. 2007; Meijaard et al. 2011), it remains unclear which growth stage or part of coconut fruits were consumed and how the animals ate the coconuts. Some local farmers believe that animals can crack open intact mature coconuts to eat the kernel. Others have expressed excessive fear and aversion towards the animals. To overcome these negative beliefs, it is necessary to clear the misconceptions surrounding the ecology of babirusas (Ito et al. 2008; Indonesian Ministry of Forestry 2013; Ito and Melletti 2017). For this purpose, it is important to generate greater knowledge of the feeding habits of babirusas in the cultivated areas.

Our recent investigation of the animal's response to coconut palm trees and intact whole coconuts revealed 1) that babirusas are able to crack open fallen immature coconut fruits and 2) that as coconut fruits develop, animals spend more time attempting to open fruits but largely fail to crack the mature coconuts used as raw material in copra production. In addition, we reported the possibility that babirusas eat fallen staminate flowers, broken pieces of coconut kernel, and haustorium scattered over coconut groves as wastes after copra production (Ito et al. 2020).

During behavioural observations (Ito et al. 2020), we noticed that babirusas tended to eat the basal part of the mesocarp of young coconuts that had not yet formed solid endosperm or kernels. Thus, we questioned 1) whether the babirusa's selection of the basal part of the young coconut mesocarp is opportunistic, and if not, 2) whether there are differences between the basal part and other parts of the young mesocarp perceived by the babirusa.

Hence, the objectives of this study were 1) to better understand the babirusa's feeding behaviour based on direct observation and video analysis, in particular the apparent preference for the basal part of young coconut mesocarp by the comparison of the size of feeding marks on the basal and apical ends, and 2) to explore the potential physicochemical factors influencing the preference for the basal coconut mesocarp by measuring the breaking load or hardness and performing nutritional and gas chromatography-mass spectrophotometry (GC-MS) analyses.

Materials and methods

Study site and period

The observations of the feeding behaviour and experiments were carried out at the Bali Zoo in Singapadu Village, Bali, Indonesia. These were intermittently conducted for a total of 36 days between 26 August 2017 and 30 August 2018.

Animals, enclosure and husbandry

Two female zoo-based Sulawesi babirusas (B. celebensis), 13 and 14 years of age at the onset of observations, were observed in this study. Both animals had been familiar with coconut palm trees and their fruits since they were one year old (Ito et al. 2019a, 2019b, 2020). They were kept in a 100 m2 enclosure with a ground surface of hard soil and gravel. Two simple shelters, a water pool and mud wallow, were provided for the animals. In the centre of the enclosure, a coconut palm tree provided shade. During the study period, animal handling was kept to a minimum. Keepers fed the animals twice a day in the morning and late afternoon, with additional tree leaf fodder given at mid-day.

Plant material

A total of 147 fresh immature coconut fruits were obtained from a local coconut grove. Of these, 29 coconuts were used for an initial test of feeding behaviour. The next 111 coconuts were used to identify and compare the feeding marks of babirusas. The remaining seven coconuts, weighing 1.0 kg each, were delivered to laboratories within three days of harvesting for physicochemical analyses. Of these seven coconuts, three were used for the breaking load measurement, three for the nutrition analyses, and one for the GC-MS analysis. The coconuts used in this study consisted of seeds and three layers: a thin smooth exocarp (outermost layer), a thick fleshy mesocarp (middle layer), and a thin, soft endocarp (inner layer surrounding the seed). The basal part of the mesocarp was mainly composed of non-fibrous parenchyma tissue, whereas the apical part was composed of still visibly young fibres embedded in the parenchyma. These coconuts had not yet formed kernels in the seeds (Fig. 1A). In morphological term, the coconut surface attached to the spikelet (branch of the inflorescence) was designated as the basal end, and the opposite end was designated as the apical end.

Plant tissue sampling

Tissue sampling for the nutritional analysis and GC-MS analysis was conducted as follows: First, the whole coconut was split with a stainless-steel knife into a basal half and an apical half. This was to avoid the cross-contamination of the two distinct samples taken from the same mesocarp layer. Second, the exocarp and endocarp layers were completely removed from each half. Third, a sample was cut out of each end of the mesocarp. These were immediately placed in individual containers, sealed and kept frozen at –20°C until analysis.

Fig. 1.

Diagram of the longitudinal sections of coconut fruits, modified from Ito et al. (2020). A: Immature coconut fruit. The basal end is attached to the coconut palm via a spikelet. B: Twelve radial partitions on the split coconut halves to determine the position and total surface area of feeding marks. The shaded areas indicate the target of the evaluation. C: Mature (germinating) coconut fruit.

fi_ms2020-0059_001.jpg

Behavioural observations

Twenty-nine young coconuts with a mean weight of 996 g (SD = 200.4, range: 530 g to 1310 g) were cut longitudinally from the basal end to the apical end with a stainless-steel knife. An average of 4.5 coconut halves (SD = 1.5) per day were placed on the ground in the shade of the palm tree for the babirusas at the time of the morning feeding. For 13 days, between 26 August 2017 and 19 April 2018, the animals' feeding behaviour and responses to the split coconut halves, such as sniffing, manipulating with snout or forelimbs, and biting or scooping with teeth, were observed from the moment of approach until leaving. These behaviours were also video-recorded from outside the enclosure. The total video-recording time was about 1 h 15 min.

Feeding mark sampling

To determine the position and surface area (mm2) of the coconut parts eaten by the babirusas, a feeding experiment was conducted for 23 days between 26 July 2018 and 30 August 2018. A total of 111 young coconuts with a mean size of 13.2 cm (SD = 1.1) × 11.0 cm (SD = 0.9) and mean weight of 839 g (SD = 172.3, range: 520 g to 1280 g) were prepared for the experiment. The coconuts were cut longitudinally. One split half was used as a test food, and the other half was kept untouched as a reference. An average of 4.8 coconut halves (SD = 1.4) per day were placed on the ground at the time of the morning feeding at approximately one metre intervals. Once the feeding was over, the leftovers were immediately collected and gently rinsed with running water. The surface with feeding marks was then photographed together with the reference half.

Gypsum moulding of feeding marks

In the photographs of the leftover coconuts, the boundaries between the parts eaten and uneaten were too uncertain to accurately evaluate the position and surface area of the eaten parts, even though the eaten areas tended to turn dark brown in colour. In addition, the parts that had been fed on shrank unevenly over time due to the natural dryness of the enclosure. To overcome these complications and obtain better three-dimensional evidence, the internal surface structure of 106 pairs of the coconut halves (sample nos. 1 to 106) with feeding marks were moulded with plaster (Gypsum casting, Aplus Pacific, Indonesia) within two hours of being fed on. The remaining five pairs of halves (sample nos. 107 to 111) were immersed in ethanol to preserve them. Prior to the moulding process, a piece of duct tape was placed around the lateral edge of the cut surface of each halved coconut to accommodate the moulding material. Then, a gypsum slurry was prepared in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and poured into the chamber. After solidification, the plant tissue was removed to expose the gypsum impression. The surfaces of all impressions of the feeding marks were then photographed again under the same conditions.

Image analysis

The position and surface area (mm2) of the feeding marks on the photographs of the gypsum impressions were assessed using ImageJ software (ImageJ, v1.51j8, National Institutes of Health, USA). Based on the preliminary observational finding that babirusas tended to eat from the middle of the seed cavity towards the peripheral edge, a polar grid was superimposed on each photographed image to create 12 radial sections, each 30° (Fig. 1B). The pole of the grid was positioned at the centre of the coconut seed cavity. The polar axis (0°) was drawn vertically upwards from the pole to the basal end of the coconut, and the 12 radial sections were numbered clockwise, with the first section covering 0° to 30°. The total area covered by the feeding marks in each radial section of each test coconut was then measured. The basal area was defined as a symmetrical pair of sections, nos. 1 and 12, corresponding to the range between 330° and 30°, whereas the apical area was defined as the pair of sections on the opposite side, nos. 6 and 7, corresponding to the range between 150° and 210°. To determine significant differences in the mean total area (mm2) of the feeding marks between the basal area (section nos. 1 and 12) and apical area (nos. 6 and 7) of the same coconut halves (n = 106), a paired sample t-test was conducted.

Breaking load measurement

To investigate whether there was a relationship between the hardness of the basal and apical parts of the mesocarp and the babirusas' feeding pattern, the breaking load (stress level sufficient to break a material in Newtons [N]) of the mesocarp layer was measured using a creep meter RE33005 (Yamaden, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a brass plunger (Yamaden catalog No. 67, compress surface: 1 mm × 5 mm). Of the seven coconuts prepared for physicochemical analyses, three coconuts were used. Each coconut was split in half longitudinally with a stainless-steel knife to create a total of six flat surfaces. Then, the spherical end of the split coconut halves was cut off parallel to the cut surface in order to flatly place the sample on the table of the creep meter. The axis of the compress surface of the plunger was positioned at a right angle to the longitudinal axis of the coconut sample above the centre of the targeted part. A single measurement was taken of the basal and apical parts of each flat surface at a constant speed of 1 mm/s. Welch's t-test was applied to compare the mean breaking loads (N) of the two parts of the coconut mesocarp.

Nutritional analysis

To investigate the potential nutritional differences between the basal and apical parts of the young mesocarp, the quantity of macronutrients in each part was determined by certified methods of nutritional analysis. A total of 100 g of pooled samples from three coconuts was analysed. The water content was determined by the ambient pressure drying method at 135°C for 2 h. The crude protein content was analysed by the Dumas combustion method, multiplying the determined nitrogen content by a nitrogen-to-protein conversion factor of 6.25. The crude fat was determined by the Soxhlet extraction method using diethyl ether. The total quantity of reducing sugar was determined by the modified Somogyi method (Kobayashi and Tabuchi 1954) after acid hydrolysis of the tissue in a boiling water bath with 2.3% HCl for 2.5 h. The insoluble, soluble and total dietary fibre contents were determined using the enzymatic-gravimetric procedure (modified Prosky method; Prosky et al. 1988). The determination of the dietary fibre contents was performed three times, and those of the other nutritional components was performed twice. The means were used as the final values.

GC-MS analysis

To explore the potential chemical factors behind the babirusa's preference for the basal part of coconuts, the dynamic headspace GC-MS technique was employed to separate and identify volatile compounds in the basal and apical parts, and the volatile profiles were compared. The analysis was conducted with an Agilent 7890 GC coupled to an Agilent 5977A MSD (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with a GERSTEL MPS 2 auto sampler and GERSTEL TDU-CIS 4 injection system (GERSTEL, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany). Samples of both plant tissues were taken from the same mesocarp layer of one coconut fruit and thawed to a room temperature of 24°C. Then, 2.5 g of each tissue was placed in an individual 10-mL vial. Based on the ambient temperature 25°C recorded during feeding at the Bali Zoo, the extraction temperature was set to the same 25°C. The following temperature programme for the TDU was used: 30°C was held for 0.5 min and then increased to 250°C at 720°C/min and held for 5 min. The temperature programme for the CIS was as follows: 10°C was held for 0.5 min and then increased to 250°C at 720°C/min and held for 20 min. The TDU was operated in the split-less mode. Separation was carried out on an Agilent DB-WAX UI column (60 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25-µm film thickness; Agilent Technologies) with the following oven temperature programme: 40°C was held for 3 min and then increased to 250°C at 5°C/min and held for 5 min. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a constant flow rate at 2.11 mL/min. MS analysis was carried out by electron ionization at 70 eV. The ion source and quadrupole temperatures were set at 230°C and 150°C, respectively. The analytical conditions were identical for both samples. The major volatile components were identified by matching the mass spectra obtained with those in the NIST 14 Library (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) ( http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/). The quantitative differences between the two samples were then evaluated by comparing the peak areas of the chromatograms.

Fig. 2.

Images of a female Sulawesi babirusa eating a longitudinally sectioned immature coconut from the basal side (taken from video). Whole coconut size and weight: 12.5 cm × 10.0 cm, 680 g. A: Sniffing the cut surface of the immature coconut. B: Onset of eating the inside of the immature coconut. Scooping the basal part of the coconut with her mandibular incisor teeth. C: Holding down the apical part with the hoof of her forelimb. D: Continuing to eat the basal part of the immature coconut.

fi_ms2020-0059_002.jpg

Statistical analyses

All analyses were carried out in R version 2.8.1 (R Development Core Team 2008), with P < 0.05 indicating statistical significance.

Results

Feeding behaviours

Independently of the size and weight of coconuts, the babirusas demonstrated the following pattern of feeding behaviour. Prior to the first bite, the animals examined the cut surface of the coconut half with their noses while wiggling both the right and left ends of the nasal disc on the snout without exception (100%, 58 of 58 halves; Fig. 2A). Then, they placed their mandibular incisor teeth on the internal surface of the seed cavity and scooped the immature endocarp and mesocarp layers towards the peripheral edge of the coconut half with their teeth (Fig. 2B). When the animals manipulated the coconut with their snout, or their teeth touched the surface, the split half would spin on the ground or begin to wobble. When this happened, they frequently held down one end of the split half with the hoof of their forelimb (Fig. 2C). The first few bites were almost always taken from the basal side of the young mesocarp (87.9%, 51 of 58 halves; Fig. 2B–D). The babirusas appeared to consume more of the basal side of the young mesocarp layer (Figs. 2D and 3).

Position and surface size of feeding marks

The mean total area (mm2) of the feeding marks in each radial section is shown in Table 1. The paired sample t-test indicated that there was a statistically significant difference between the eaten basal area (radial section nos. 1 and 12, M = 2034, SD = 761, n = 106) and the corresponding area in the apical part (section nos. 6 and 7, M = 267, SD = 338, n = 106; t [105] = 23.75, P < 0.001). On average, the eaten basal area was 7.6 times larger than the corresponding area in the apical part (Fig. 4). Even when the analysed sections were expanded to include section nos. 1, 2, 11, and 12 as the basal area (M = 2932, SD = 1122, n = 106) vs. section nos. 5 to 8 as the apical area (M = 467, SD = 579, n = 106), a significant difference was still detected (paired sample t-test, t [105] = 23.88, P < 0.001).

Hardness

As shown in Fig. 5, the apical part of the young mesocarp had a significantly higher breaking load (M = 43.8, SD = 6.4, n = 6) than the basal part (M = 19.5, SD = 2.5, n = 6; Welch's t-test, t [6.51] = 8.71, P < 0.001).

Nutritional content

The results of the nutritional analysis are presented in Table 2.

Fig. 3.

The reference half of the coconut (upper row) and the leftover half of the test coconut with feeding marks (lower row). The basal end of the halves is directed upward. The feeding marks on the experimental halves are located on the basal side. Plant tissue crushed by teeth tends to quickly turn dark brown. From left to right: coconut nos. 49 to 54 with a whole coconut weight of 810 g, 790 g, 750 g, 740 g, 730 g, and 650 g, respectively. The scale bar indicates 5 cm.

fi_ms2020-0059_003.jpg

Table 1.

Mean and standard deviation (SD) of total area (mm2) of the feeding marks in the 12 radial partitions on the longitudinally cut surface of the young coconut fruits

ta_ms2020-0059_001.gif

Fig. 4.

Total surface areas of the feeding marks made by the Sulawesi babirusas on the split halves of young coconut fruits. A: Mean total area (mm2) of the feeding marks on six symmetrical pairs of young coconut fruits with radial partitions marked on the longitudinally cut surface (n = 106). Error bars indicate 1 SD. The total surface area of the feeding marks on the basal area (“1 + 12”) was significantly larger than that on the apical area (“6 + 7”; paired sample t-test, P < 0.001). B: Difference in the total area (mm2) of feeding marks on the basal and apical areas of young coconut fruits (n = 106). Numerical values on the Y axis are calculated as “the basal part minus the apical part”, and “0” on the Y axis means that the values of both areas are equal.

fi_ms2020-0059_004.jpg

Fig. 5.

Mean breaking load of the basal and apical parts of immature coconut mesocarp (n = 6). Error bars indicate 1 SD. The breaking load of the basal part was significantly lower than that of the apical part (Welch's t-test, P < 0.001).

fi_ms2020-0059_005.jpg

Table 2.

Nutritional content of the basal and apical parts of the immature coconut mesocarp

ta_ms2020-0059_002.gif

Fig. 6.

Total GC-MS chromatogram of the immature coconut mesocarp. A: The basal part of the immature mesocarp. B: The apical part of the immature mesocarp. Numbered peaks are identified in Table 3. Peaks marked with an asterisk (*) are background peaks found in the blank runs.

fi_ms2020-0059_006.jpg

Volatile compounds

The total GC-MS chromatogram of the immature mesocarp samples revealed the presence of 19 main compounds, 14 of which were identified (Fig. 6; Table 3). The most dominant compound in the basal part of the mesocarp was 3-methylbutanal (peak 2, retention time: 8.23), and there was an eightfold difference relative to the apical part (peak area value, 1013 vs. 123, respectively). Also, four times more 2-methylbutanal (peak 1, retention time: 8.15) was detected in the basal part than in the apical part (peak area value, 564 vs. 119, respectively). 1-Butanol (peak 10, retention time: 13.90) was recorded in both samples with a similar peak area (597 vs. 476).

Table 3.

Volatile profiles of the basal and apical parts of the immature coconut mesocarp

ta_ms2020-0059_003.gif

Discussion

Food preference of babirusas

Leus (1994, 1996) published an extensive list of potential food sources for babirusas in the wild, highlighting the importance of the fruits of fruit-bearing trees in their natural habitat. Babirusas have also been observed to consume leaves, roots, invertebrates, and animal matter with careful selection of food items (Leus et al. 1992; Leus and Vercammen 1996).

Interestingly, even if the coconut hemisphere wobbled and sometimes spun around on the ground, babirusas almost always began to eat the mesocarp from the basal side of the young coconuts (Fig. 2B–D). In addition, the total surface area of the feeding marks on the basal area was 7.6 times larger than that on the apical area (Fig. 4A). These behavioural and geometric findings indicate that babirusas are able to discriminate between the basal and apical parts of the young coconut fruit and that the basal part is the more preferred part.

Hardness

The basal sample had a significantly lower breaking load (M = 19.5 N) compared to the apical sample (M = 43.8 N) (Fig. 5). This difference is consistent with the difference in the degree of accumulation of lignocellulosic fibres, known as coir fibres, which is visible on the two sides of the cut surface of the mesocarp. The lower hardness of the basal part may play an important role in making it easier to bite it off and may also have a better texture for mastication. In more mature coconuts, the breaking load of the basal side of the mesocarp would probably be higher and lead to a reduction in the amount of consumed mesocarp even on the basal side.

Nutritional contents

The nutritional data shown in Table 2 should be interpreted with caution. Unfortunately, only a single pooled sample was used for the nutritional analysis of three young coconuts due to the limited number of coconuts. Hence, to demonstrate that the observed differences in the nutritional content (Table 2) are the potential key factors influencing the preference for the basal part, further analyses with sufficient replications are required.

Volatile compounds

The distinctive mild, sweet smell of lactones has been reported as an important flavour component of mature coconut kernels (Lin and Wilkens 1970; Saittagaroon et al. 1984). However, these compounds were not found in the GC-MS chromatogram of the coconuts evaluated herein. Rather, we found two large peaks (Fig. 6) corresponding with 2-methylbutanal and 3-methylbutanal in the basal sample (Table 3), although our results were based on the analysis of a single coconut. This can probably be attributed to the differences in the plant tissues and their stage of maturity given that we examined the mesocarp, or the outer layer of the seed, of immature coconuts in an early stage before the kernels had developed (Fig. 1).

The 2- and 3-methylbutanals are important flavour compounds in foods (Smit et al. 2009) and have been found in a wide variety of fresh foods and food products, such as meat, fish, cheese, olive oil, cacao beans, tomato, malts, baked potatoes, truffles, and certain alcoholic beverages (Woffenden et al. 2001; Duckham et al. 2002; Cserháti and Forgács 2003; Splivallo et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2017). The organoleptic properties of 2-methylbutanal are described as musty, chocolate, nutty, furfural, and isovaleraldehyde-like with malty and fermented nuances (Mosciano 1998). Similarly, 3-methylbutanal is described as ethereal, aldehydic, chocolate, peach, malty, and fatty (Miller et al. 1974; Cserháti and Forgács 2003; The Good Scents Company 2009).

Meanwhile, the peak of 1-butanol was relatively large in the chromatogram of the basal sample, but appeared to have a similar peak area to the apical sample (597 vs. 476). Thus, this compound may not be characteristic of basal tissue.

Taking into account the behavioural findings and differences in the GC-MS chromatogram between the basal and apical samples, it is likely that the babirusas' selection of the basal part of the immature coconut mesocarp can be attributed to the emission of volatile substances such as 2- and 3-methylbutanal. However, we cannot discount the possibility that the quantitative differences in other components, along with the complex mixture of volatile components present in young coconuts, were important contributory factors that attracted the babirusas.

In any case, further comparative analyses between the two parts are necessary to confirm the preference for the basal part of young coconuts and to acquire more conclusive evidence that would link the presence of specific volatile compounds with the selection of the basal part by the babirusa.

Applications in the natural habitat

The time interval from pollination to maturation of coconut fruits is approximately 12 months (Fandiño 1928; Chan and Elevitch 2006). The onset of the development of plant tissues in coconuts varies among the internal layers and parts of the coconut: The expansion of the seed cavity along with the storage of coconut water occurs first, and the maturation of the pericarp and development of the kernel occur afterwards (Fandiño 1928; Jayasuriya and Perera 1985). Hence, even if a fallen young coconut appears to be large in size, unless the kernel has stored fat, the young coconut has no economic value for the Togian people who produce copra or the dried kernels of mature coconuts (Ito et al. 2020). Clearly, it is unreasonable to consider an animal eating a fallen young coconut (that has not yet formed a kernel), to be a coconut pest. Instead, the actual predators decreasing coconut yields might be arboreal animals, such as rodents and Tonkean macaques (Macaca tonkeana), on the Malenge Island in the Togian Archipelago (Ito et al. 2020), and plantain squirrels (Callosciurus notatus) at the study site (Kitchener et al. 1990).

The babirusas studied herein have much in common with the babirusas on the Togian Islands in terms of environmental conditions, such as tropical climate and vegetation, and foraging experience in coconut groves. We speculate that the preference for a specific part of immature coconuts would also be shared by the babirusas on the Togian Islands. The dissemination of the experimental findings of this paper to the local people of those islands might help to remove the common misconception that babirusas crack open whole mature coconuts and destroy the economic value of copra crops.

Acknowledgments:

The authors are grateful to the director and curator of Bali Zoo for permitting us to have access to the babirusa enclosure, and also to the animal keepers and zoo kitchen staff for their assistances. All the feeding experiments were overseen by the veterinary staff. We also thank the reviewers for their thoughtful comments and suggestions. This study was funded by Babirusa Foundation Tokyo. Additional support was provided by the Balloch Trust, Scotland.

References

1.

Akbar, S., Indrawan, M., Yasin, M. P., Burton, J. and Ivan, J. 2007. Status and conservation of Babyrousa babyrussa in the Togean Islands, based on direct observations and questionnaire surveys (intermittently, 1990–2001). Suiform Soundings 7: 16–25. Google Scholar

2.

Chan, E. and Elevitch, C. R. 2006. Cocos nucifera (coconut), ver.2.1. In( Elevitch, C. R., ed.). Species Profiles for Pacific Island Agroforestry. Permanent Agriculture Resources (PAR), Holualoa. Available at  http://www.traditionaltree.org (Accessed 17 January 2020). Google Scholar

3.

Cserháti, T. and Forgács, E. 2003. Flavor (Flavour) compounds: structures and characteristics. In( Caballero, B., Trugo, L. C. and Finglas, P. M., eds.) Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition, pp. 2509–2517. Academic Press, London. Google Scholar

4.

Duckham, S. C., Dodson, A. T., Bakker, J. and Ames, J. M. 2002. Effect of cultivar and storage time on the volatile flavor components of baked potato. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50: 5640–5648. DOI: 10.1021/jf011326+. Google Scholar

5.

Fandiño, J. B. F. 1928. A study on the growth of coconut. The Philippine Agriculturist 17: 361–366. Google Scholar

6.

Indonesian Ministry of Forestry. 2013. Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan Republik, Indonesia, Nomor: P.55/ Menhut-II/2013 tentang strategi dan rencana aksi konservasi babirusa (Babyrousa babyrussa) tahun 2013–2022 [National Conservation Strategy and Action Plan for Babirusa (Babyrousa babyrussa)]. Available at  https://www.asianwildcattle.org/uploads/1/2/1/8/121825577/babirusa_strategy_and_action_plan_2013-22_indonesian.pdf (Accessed 02 June 2020). Google Scholar

7.

Ito, M., Balik, I. W. and Setiawan, L. 2008. Needs of educational activity for conservation of Togean babirusa in Togean Archipelago, Central Sulawesi. In( Priosoeryanto, B. P., Setijanto, H., Agungpriyono, S., Purwantara, B., Pamungkas, J., Djuwita, I., Noviana, D., Ernita, R., Prasetyaningtyas, W. E., Muhammad, K. et al., eds.) Proceedings. Joint Meeting of the 3rd International Meeting on Asian Zoo / Wildlife Medicine and Conservation and the 10th National Veterinary Scientific Conference of Indonesian Veterinary Medical Association, pp. 234–236. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor. Google Scholar

8.

Ito, M., Macdonald, A. A., Leus, K., Balik, I. W. and Arimbawa, I. W. G. B. 2019a. Effects of meteorological factors on the expression of nesting behaviour in the Sulawesi babirusa (Babyrousa celebensis). Japanese Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 24: 73–84. DOI: 10.5686/jjzwm.24.73. Google Scholar

9.

Ito, M., Macdonald, A. A., Leus, K., Balik, I. W., Arimbawa, I. W. G. B. and Atmaja, I. D. G. A. 2019b. Nest building behaviour of Sulawesi babirusa (Babyrousa celebensis). Japanese Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 24: 9–20. DOI: doi.org/10.5686/jjzwm.24.9. Google Scholar

10.

Ito, M., Macdonald, A. A., Leus, K., Balik, I. W., Arimbawa, I. W. G. B., Hasegawa, Y. and Atmaja, I. D. G. A. 2020. Coconut feeding of the babirusa (Babyrousa spp.). Japanese Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 25: 91–100. Google Scholar

11.

Ito, M. and Melletti, M. 2017. Chapter 8. Togian Babirusa Babyrousa togeanensis (Sody, 1949). In( Melletti, M. and Meijaard, E., eds.) Ecology, Conservation and Management of Wild Pigs and Peccaries, pp. 76–84. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI: 10.1017/9781316941232.010. Google Scholar

12.

Ito, M., Nakata, H., Jaga, I. M. and Balik, I. W. 2005. Status of Togian babirusa (Babyrousa babyrussa togeanensis) on Malenge Island, Central Sulawesi. In( Sugiri, N., Mustari, A. H., Suwelo, I. S. and Djuwita, I., eds.) Kumpulan Makalah Seminar Sehari Peduli Anoa dan Babirusa Indonesia, pp. 71–77. IPB, Departemen Kehutanan, LIPI and Pusat Informasi Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia, Bogor. Google Scholar

13.

Jayasuriya, V. U. De S. and Perera, R. K. I. S. 1985. Growth, development and dry matter accumulation in the fruit of Cocos nucifera L. var nana form pumila. COCOS 3: 16–21. DOI: 10.4038/cocos.v3i0.817. Google Scholar

14.

Kitchener, D. J., Boeadi, Charlton, L. and Maharadatunkamsi. 1990. Wild Mammals of Lombok Island: Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia: Systematics and Natural History. Western Australian Museum, Perth, 129 pp. Google Scholar

15.

Kobayashi, T. and Tabuchi, T. 1954. A method employing a tribasic sodium phosphate buffered reagent for estimating semimicro quantities of reducing sugars. Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi 28: 171–174. DOI: 10.1271/nogeikagaku1924.28.171. (in Japanese with English abstract) Google Scholar

16.

Leus, K. 1996. The habitat and diet of the Sulawesi babirusa (Babyrousa babyrussa celebensis). In( Manansang, J., Macdonald, A. A., Siswomartono, D., Miller, P. and Seal, U., eds.) Population and Habitat Viability Assessment for the Babirusa (Babyrousa babyrussa), pp. 121–143. IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, Apple Valley. Google Scholar

17.

Leus, K., Bowles, D., Bell, J. and Macdonald, A. A. 1992. Behaviour of the babirusa (Babyrousa babyrussa) with suggestions for husbandry. Acta Zoologica et Pathologica Antverpiensia 82: 9–27. Google Scholar

18.

Leus, K., Macdonald, A., Burton, J. and Rejeki I. 2016. Babyrousa celebensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T136446A44142964.  https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T136446A44142964.en (Accessed 26 January 2019). Google Scholar

19.

Leus, K. Y. G. 1994. Foraging Behaviour, Food Selection and Diet Digestion of Babyrousa babyrussa (Suidae, Mammalia). Ph. D. Thesis, The University of Edinburg, Edinburgh, 302 pp. Google Scholar

20.

Leus, K. Y. G. and Vercammen, P. 1996. Behaviour of a male and female babirusa (Babyrousa babyrussa, Suidae, Mammalia) during the first five days after their move to a semi-natural enclosure. Der Zoologische Garten Neue Folge 66: 133–155. Google Scholar

21.

Lin, F. M. and Wilkens, W. F. 1970. Volatile flavor components of coconut meat. Journal of Food Science 35: 538–539. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1970.tb04802.x. Google Scholar

22.

Macdonald, A. A. 1993. The Babirusa (Babyrousa babyrussa). In( Oliver, W. L. R., ed.) Pigs, Peccaries, and Hippos: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, pp. 161–171. IUCN, Gland. Google Scholar

23.

Macdonald, A. A. 2017. Chapter 6. Sulawesi Babirusa Babyrousa celebensis (Deninger, 1909). In( Melletti, M. and Meijaard, E., eds.) Ecology, Conservation and Management of Wild Pigs and Peccaries, pp. 59–69. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI: 10.1017/9781316941232.008. Google Scholar

24.

Macdonald, A., Leus K., Masaaki, I. and Burton, J. 2016. Babyrousa togeanensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T136472A44143172.  https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T136472A44143172.en (Accessed 26 January 2019). Google Scholar

25.

Macdonald, A. A. and Pattikawa, M. J. 2017. Babirusa and other pigs on Buru Island, Maluku, Indonesia – new findings. Suiform Soundings 16: 5–18. Google Scholar

26.

Meijaard, E., d'Huart, J. P. and Oliver, W. L. R. 2011. Family Suidae (pigs). In( Wilson, D. E. and Mittermeier, R. A., eds.) Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Volume 2: Hoofed Mammals, pp. 248–291, Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

27.

Miller, A., Morgan, M. E. and Libbey, L. M. 1974. Lactobacillus maltaromicus, a new species producing a malty aroma. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 24: 346–354. DOI: 10.1099/00207713-24-3-346. Google Scholar

28.

Mosciano, G. 1998. Organoleptic characteristics of flavor materials. Perfumer & Flavorist 23: 33–36. Google Scholar

29.

Prosky, L., Asp, N. G., Schweizer, T. F., DeVries, J. W. and Furda, I. 1988. Determination of insoluble, soluble, and total dietary fiber in foods and food products: interlaboratory study. Journal of Association of Official Analytical Chemists 71: 1017–1023. Google Scholar

30.

R Development Core Team. 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at  http://www.R-project.org/ (Accessed 15 June 2017). Google Scholar

31.

Saittagaroon, S., Kawakishi, S. and Mamiki, M. 1984. Aroma constituents of roasted coconut. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 48: 2301–2307. DOI: 10.1271/bbb1961.48.2301. Google Scholar

32.

Smit, B. A., Engels, W. J. M. and Smit, G. 2009. Branched chain aldehydes: production and breakdown pathways and relevance for flavour in foods. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 81: 987–999. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-008-1758-x. Google Scholar

33.

Splivallo, R., Ottonello, S., Mello, A. and Karlovsky, P. 2011. Truffle volatiles: from chemical ecology to aroma biosynthesis. New Phytologist189:688–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03523.xGoogle Scholar

34.

The Good Scents Company. 2009. Isovaleraldehyde, 3-methylbutyral-dehyde. Available at  http://www.thegoodscentscompany.com/data/rw1023131.html (Accessed 18 April 2020). Google Scholar

35.

Wang, L., Qian, C., Bai, J., Luo, W., Jin, C. and Yu, Z. 2017. Difference in volatile composition between the pericarp tissue and inner tissue of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruit. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 42: e13387. DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.13387. Google Scholar

36.

Woffenden, H. M., Ames, J. M. and Chandra, S. 2001. Relationships between antioxidant activity, color, and flavor compounds of crystal malt extracts. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 49: 5524–5530. DOI: 10.1021/jf010583b. Google Scholar
© The Mammal Society of Japan
Masaaki Ito, Alastair A. Macdonald, Kristin Leus, Yamato Hasegawa, I Wayan Balik, I Wayan Gede Bandem Arimbawa, and I Dewa Gede Agung Atmaja "Selection of the Young Coconut Mesocarp by the Sulawesi Babirusa (Babyrousa celebensis)," Mammal Study 46(3), 213-223, (2 June 2021). https://doi.org/10.3106/ms2020-0059
Received: 10 June 2020; Accepted: 18 December 2020; Published: 2 June 2021
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
breaking load
food preference
volatile compound
wild pig
young coconut husk
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top