Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2015 Oogenesis and Fecundity Type of Gray Triggerfish in the Gulf of Mexico
Erik T. Lang
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The fecundity of Gray Triggerfish Balistes capriscus has been difficult to estimate, as few imminently spawning or recently spawned females have been detected. Our study focused on verifying the pattern of oogenesis and fecundity type in Gray Triggerfish. During 1999–2012, females (n = 1,092) were collected from the eastern Gulf of Mexico, and subsets of these fish were used to calculate condition indices and assess ovarian histology. The gonadosomatic index, hepatosomatic index, and Fulton's condition factor indicated that liver and somatic energy stores increased prior to spawning and were depleted throughout the spawning period, characteristic of a capital pattern of energy storage and allocation to reproduction. Typical of a capital breeding pattern, we also observed (1) a hiatus in oocyte size distribution and (2) group-synchronous oogenesis, which are both traits of a determinate fecundity type. However, evidence that fecundity was not set prior to spawning included the observation of “de novo” vitellogenesis during the spawning season; secondary oocytes increased in number and failed to increase in mean size over time. Thus, Gray Triggerfish exhibit an indeterminate fecundity type with mixed reproductive traits that may characterize species exhibiting female parental care in warmwater environments. Further, we estimated the secondary oocyte growth rate (37 µm/d) based upon the time lag of postovulatory follicle (POF) degeneration. Using oocyte growth rate and the proportion of females bearing POFs, the interspawning interval was estimated to range from 8 to 11 d, indicating that 8–11 batches/female could be produced during the estimated 86-d reproductive period. The hiatus in oocyte size distribution was used to define a minimum size (250 µm) from which to distinguish an advancing batch of secondary growth oocytes. Batch fecundity (BF) ranged from 0.34 to 1.99 million eggs and was significantly related to FL (mm): BF = 8,703.69-FL - 1,776,483 (r2 = 0.56).

The Gray Triggerfish Balistes capriscus is an economically important species in recreational and commercial fisheries of the Gulf of Mexico (hereafter, Gulf). Like other Gulf species, measures of reproductive potential for Gray Triggerfish are needed to support assessments of stock status, and reproductive potential estimated from fecundity metrics is most accurate (Paulik 1973; Tomkiewicz et al. 2003; Lambert 2008; McBride et al. 2015). Unfortunately, particular fecundity methodologies have been applied to some species without validation, thus necessitating corrections (e.g., Arocha 2002; Gordo et al. 2008; Fitzhugh et al. 2012). An understanding of oogenesis allows for classification of a species' fecundity type and provides insight on spawning frequency (Murua and Saborido-Rey 2003; Witthames et al. 2009).

Although information on Gray Triggerfish reproduction exists in research reports, the pattern of oogenesis and fecundity type in this species have not been validated. In a 2005 Gulf stock assessment, the Gray Triggerfish was assumed to be an asynchronous indeterminate spawner that produces numerous batches (Ingram 2001; SEDAR 09 2006). Previous unpublished studies had difficulties in determining Gray Triggerfish fecundity and/or spawning frequency (Wilson et al. 1995; Hood and Johnson 1997; Ingram 2001; Moore 2001), primarily because females with advanced-stage oocytes (oocyte maturation [OM]) were very rare among the collected samples and because postovulatory follicles (POFs) were detected in few females (Ofori-Danson 1990; Wilson et al. 1995; Hood and Johnson 1997; Ingram 2001; Moore 2001). This has generated uncertainty and a broad range in estimates of spawning frequency.

Part of the difficulty in classifying reproductive traits and fecundity type may lie in the rather unique biology of the Gray Triggerfish. It is a nesting species with a haremic mating system wherein the males and females share short-term parental care (Simmons and Szedlmayer 2012). Considering this mating system, a better understanding of fecundity type for Gray Triggerfish may depend on determining the female reproductive energy strategy utilized from the income-capital breeding typology (Stearns 1992; Jönsson 1997; Jager et al. 2008; McBride et al. 2015). Capital breeders are commonly cold-water species that experience dynamic seasonality. Before the reproductive season begins, energy for reproduction is acquired and stored during periods when food may be abundant (Jager et al. 2008). In income breeders, a rapid transfer of energy to reproduction may occur when ecosystem productivity is high yet the timing of productivity is less predictable in time and space (Santos et al. 2010; McBride et al. 2015). It is also possible for species to exhibit mixed capital and income traits depending on the degree of available surplus energy and demands from activities such as migration and parental care (Jager et al. 2008; McBride et al. 2015). In several fish species, the accessory behaviors of parental care have been associated with high energy demands, which can affect other life history traits (Kuwamura 1997; Donelson et al. 2008; Jager et al. 2008). The objectives of the present study were to (1) verify fecundity type for Gray Triggerfish in the Gulf, (2) classify energy storage in light of the mating system, (3) calculate spawning frequency, and (4) postulate a method to estimate annual fecundity for this species.

METHODS

Sample collection and condition indices.—Hook-and-line sampling of Gray Triggerfish was conducted to observe a time series of reproductive development during May—July 2012 in Gulf waters offshore of Panama City, Florida. All captured specimens were retained, measured for FL to the nearest millimeter, and weighed to the nearest gram. Dorsal spines were extracted for age estimation; livers were excised and weighed; gonads were removed, macroscopically assessed for sex and reproductive state, and weighed; and ovaries were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (<24 h on ice) for further processing in the laboratory (see below). Length, weight, macroscopic sex and reproductive state, and (in some cases) gonad weight, liver weight, and ovary tissue samples were also measured or obtained from specimens collected by trapping, spearing, or hook and line in various fishery-independent and fishery-dependent surveys within the northern Gulf (1999–2012; Table 1). The gonadosomatic index (GSI), hepatosomatic index (HSI), and Fulton's condition factor (K; Ricker 1975) based upon weight (g) and FL (cm) were used to examine the relationship between energy storage and reproduction:

e01_338.gif

TABLE 1.

Number of samples obtained for each body index measure (Fulton's condition factor [K], gonadosomatic index [GSI], and hepatosomatic index [HSI]) calculated for female Gray Triggerfish from various fisheries-independent and fisheries-dependent sources in the eastern Gulf of Mexico, 1999–2012. Gear types were hook and line (HL; includes bandit reel), trap (TR), and spear (SP).

t01_338.gif

Oocyte staging and measurements.—Oocyte stage and oocyte diameter in Gray Triggerfish were used to categorize fecundity type as determinate or indeterminate. The key criteria used to test for determinate fecundity followed Hunter et al. (1992) and Murua and Saborido-Rey (2003). The criteria include (1) a hiatus in the size distribution of developing oocytes, (2) an increase in secondary oocyte diameter through the spawning season, (3) a decrease in the number of secondary growth oocytes through the spawning season, and (4) a secondary oocyte growth rate (G) that does not allow for “de novo” vitellogenesis within one spawning period.

Oocyte stage and size data were obtained by examining an approximately 150-mg subsample removed from the posterior region of all available ovaries following the method of Harris et al. (2002). Each sub sample was weighed, and the oocytes were disassociated with forceps and plated as a whole mount in a petri dish (150-mm diameter) to be imaged with an EPSON V750 scanner. The top or cover of the scanner rested on the petri dish, parallel with the bottom of the scanner. The scanner's software (EPSON Scan) was set to scan “positive film” at 2,400 dpi in “professional” mode, which allowed for a transmitted light image with high resolution.

FIGURE 1.

Tissue subsamples (∼150 mg) were extracted from Gray Triggerfish ovaries, and disassociated oocytes were scanned in a 150-mm Petri dish. Screen captures are shown for (A) the lowest scan magnification, (B) ObjectJ delineation of secondary growth oocytes, and (C) the highest scan magnification at 2,400-dpi resolution. Secondary growth oocytes appear dark against the background using transmitted light.

f01_338.jpg

The image was then uploaded into ObjectJ, a plug-in for ImageJ (version 1.47 s), to conduct image analysis. Primary growth oocytes were difficult to count and measure in the scans because of their small size (<100 µm) and low degree of clarity (Figure 1). Secondary growth oocytes (including cortical alveolar oocytes and vitellogenic oocytes) from 2012 samples were automatically counted and measured by using a macro within ObjectJ (Figure 1; //simon.bio.uva.nl/objectj/7a-Examples.html). Counts of secondary oocytes were used to estimate batch fecundity (BF) based upon an oocyte size criterion (see Results) and were expressed as somatic relative fecundity (eggs/g of ovary-free body weight; Kjesbu et al. 1998) and oocyte density (secondary oocyte count/g of ovary weight) for comparison with other studies. Oocyte size frequency histograms were used to assess a hiatus in oocyte development, whereas oocyte enumeration and diameter were regressed against time within the spawning season to resolve determinate fecundity criteria 2 and 3. Three randomly selected females were chosen from each month (May–July; i.e., a total of 9 females) to represent the oocyte size distribution. All regressions were performed using R version 2.13.1.

Postovulatory follicle measurements.—Ovary samples from all years were processed histologically with hematoxylin and eosin stain. Using an ocular microscope camera (MiniVid; 5 MP), photos were taken of each histology slide in which POFs were present. Five random images were chosen from all possible nonrepetitive images of each histology slide with oocytes filling the frame. Each oocyte that represented the leading stage of oogenesis (cortical alveolar or vitellogenic oocytes) and that was sectioned through the germinal vesicle was measured for diameter (Foucher and Beamish 1980). The area of every POF present within the five random images was measured and plotted as a predictor of leading oocyte stage diameter.

Oocyte growth and interspawning interval.—Oocyte growth was determined using methods similar to those of Ganias et al. (2011). The POF area was converted to a percentage of POF duration by using known POF durations from oceanic species with a temperature regime similar to that of Gray Triggerfish (Jackson et al. 2006). Simple linear regression was used to investigate changes in oocyte size, number, and growth over time.

The G of secondary oocytes was calculated using the difference in oocyte size (Oi after some period of growth (time lag; ti ) and the average size of oocytes from the spawning batch at the beginning of spawning batch development for the whole population (βo; Ganias et al. 2011). The average oocyte sizes at the beginning of the spawning cycle were observed in fish with the most recent POFs. Because POFs are resorbed relatively quickly in Gulf warmwater fishes, the ti could be estimated from the percent change in POF area over an expected 24-h duration (≤24 h in 24–28.5°C water; Jackson et al. 2006):

e02_338.gif

Spawning frequency was calculated using both the interspawning interval (ISI; Ganias et al. 2011) and POF (Parker 1980) methods. The ISI method assumes that the growth of secondary oocytes is group synchronous and that G is constant; thus, the ISI is the difference between the minimum (Ob ) and maximum (Oe ) observed sizes of secondary oocytes divided by G:

e03_338.gif

The POF method is based upon the proportion of females bearing POFs relative to the total number of mature females sampled during the spawning season. Maturity was designated based upon the presence of vitellogenic oocytes. Because we estimate that POF duration is 24 h, the inverse of the proportion of females bearing POFs yields the expected spawning interval in days (Parker 1980). Due to the often-opportunistic collection of samples during surveys, the sample sizes varied from year to year and were ad hoc with respect to the timing of reproductive development and spawning. Samples were grouped across years to increase the sample size for the POF method. This grouping necessarily assumes that there is no difference in spawning intensity—and, hence, prevalence of POFs—among years.

RESULTS

Field Sampling and Condition Indices

In total, 1,092 female Gray Triggerfish were collected from various fishery-independent and fishery-dependent sources in the northern Gulf during 1999–2012, and 85% of these females were captured from depths of 10–50 m (Table 1). Of the collected females, 629 had gonad weight data for use in calculating GSI; 238 had liver weight data for use in HSI estimation; and 531 were histologically examined for POFs. The HSI peaked in May, 1 month before peak spawning (peak GSI); decreased sharply from May to September; and then began to increase again (Figure 2). Seasonally, K from all 1,092 females decreased after June, consistent with the HSI and GSI evidence that energy stores increased during the spring, were highest at the onset of spawning, and were depleted throughout the spawning period (Figure 3).

Oocyte Size Analysis

Examination of oocyte size frequency distributions suggested a group-synchronous pattern of oocyte development, which is commonly associated with determinate fecundity (Figure 4). The individual oocyte size frequencies for seven of the nine randomly selected females were bimodally distributed, and four of those seven females showed a clear hiatus between the cortical alveolar stage and the vitellogenic oocyte stage. Females that exhibited a unimodal peak in oocyte distribution had smaller oocytes on average, with early vitellogenic oocytes that we expect would have disassociated in size from the primary growth and cortical alveolar stages over time. However, linear regressions of secondary oocyte diameter (r2 = 0.05, P = 0.148; Figure 5) or the number of secondary growth oocytes (r2 = 0.01, P = 0.491; Figure 6) versus time during the spawning season were not significant. Secondary growth oocytes did not increase in diameter and did not decrease in number as the spawning season progressed; therefore, contrary to our results on oocyte size frequency distributions, this finding did not support a determinate fecundity type for Gray Triggerfish.

FIGURE 2.

Mean (±SE) gonadosomatic index (GSI) and hepatosomatic index (HSI) of female Gray Triggerfish collected from the northern Gulf of Mexico, 1999–2012. Sample sizes are indicated for each month.

f02_338.jpg

Oocyte Growth and Interspawning Interval

Despite more intensive sampling during the spawning season in some years (e.g., 2012), POFs were rarely found—occurring in only 31 of the 531 females that were sampled for histology. Over 50% of those 31 recently spawned females possessed POFs with a collapsed lumen and thus a smaller POF surface area and a skewed size distribution. However, data on POF surface area for seven recently spawned females collected in 2001 were tested and fulfilled the linear regression assumptions for normality among means (Shapiro—Wilk normality test: W = 0.8957, P = 0.306). A Shapiro—Wilk normality test also indicated that the diameter of secondary growth oocytes was normally distributed (W = 0.9288, P = 0.541). Growth of secondary oocytes exhibited an inverse linear trend with POFs: as secondary oocytes grew larger, the surface area of POFs diminished (r2 = 0.63, P = 0.034; Figure 7).

FIGURE 3.

Mean (±SE) Fulton's condition factor for female Gray Triggerfish collected from the northern Gulf of Mexico, 1999–2012. Sample sizes are indicated for each month.

f03_338.jpg

By estimating the G of secondary growth oocytes, we calculated the ISI to be 11 d. This computation used the POF duration from oceanic fish species that reside in similar water temperatures (Jackson et al. 2006) and used the POF “clock” to estimate ti . We found that the maximum POF surface area for a Gray Triggerfish was 12 µm2. Given that a POF shrinks as it ages and may last about 24 h (1 d), we observed a 74% decrease in POF surface area during an oocyte size regression series from 2001 (Figure 7). Thus, the proportional decrease in POF surface area over time served as the denominator to standardize to 24 h the corresponding growth in secondary oocytes (estimated G = 37 µm/d). The resulting ISI of 11 d was rapid enough to allow for de novo vitellogenesis to occur multiple times during the spawning season, which would indicate an indeterminate fecundity type. Therefore, three of the four hypothesis tests supported indeterminate fecundity in Gray Triggerfish.

Using the POF method, we calculated an average ISI of 7.6 d. Females were observed on 43 sampling dates between May 26 and August 19 during 1999–2012. The spawning interval was calculated as the inverse of the proportion of females with POFs (n = 31) among the total number of mature females (n = 236). Thus, the proportion with POFs (31/236) was 0.131, and the inverse was 7.6. For the 86-d spawning season, estimated as the interval during which POFs were detected, the POF method predicted that a female could produce up to 11 batches/season, and the ISI method predicted up to 8 batches/season.

Batch Fecundity Estimation

Gray Triggerfish undergoing OM and/or oocyte hydration were rarely collected during routine sampling, thus adding to the challenges in estimating fecundity. Of the 236 maturing females that were collected during the spawning season, only one was a ripe female undergoing OM. Because of the group-synchronous development, the population of advancing vitellogenic oocytes can be considered equivalent to a batch. However, all fish with POFs did possess cortical alveolar oocytes and newly formed vitellogenic oocytes with diameters less than 250 µm (Figure 7). Therefore, to distinguish the oldest batch, only secondary growth oocytes of at least 250 µm in diameter were counted.

Batch fecundity ranged from 0.34 to 1.99 million eggs, and somatic relative fecundity ranged from 590 to 2,686 eggs/g of ovary-free body weight in 266–386-mm FL specimens (Table 2). A portion (56%) of the variance in BF was significantly explained by FL: BF = 8,703.69·FL - 1,776,483 (r2 = 0.56, P < 0.0001; Figure 8).

FIGURE 4.

Oocyte size frequency (number of oocytes per gram of ovary weight) for nine individual Gray Triggerfish collected from the Gulf of Mexico in May–July 2012 (three randomly selected females per month). The date of capture is displayed for each fish. The hatched bar indicates the diameters of primary growth oocytes.

f04_338.jpg

DISCUSSION

Similar to balistids worldwide. Gray Triggerfish in the Gulf spawn in pairs, are nest builders that establish and defend territories, and guard their eggs (Kuwamura 1997; Kawase 2003; Simmons and Szedlmayer 2012). Perhaps related to this reproductive strategy. Gray Triggerfish exhibit group-synchronous secondary oocyte development, which is unusual for a warmwater species. Wallace and Selman (1981) defined group-synchronous development as the presence of two populations of oocytes that are clearly distinguishable from one another: a larger, more synchronous population; and a smaller, more heterogeneous one. Gray Triggerfish clearly exhibited this pattern, with a distinct size hiatus between cortical alveolar oocytes and vitellogenic oocytes.

A group-synchronous oocyte development pattern is typically associated with determinate fecundity (Murua and Saborido-Rey 2003; McBride et al. 2015), but we found evidence that Gray Triggerfish display indeterminate fecundity. The number of vitellogenic oocytes did not decrease and their diameter did not increase through the spawning season. Both of these results suggested that de novo vitellogenesis was occurring, thus violating the criteria for a determinate fecundity type. Although rare in the literature, other species have exhibited both group-synchronous oocyte development and the potential for de novo vitellogenesis; these include the Spiny Damselfish Acanthochromis polyacanthus, Mediterranean Sardine Sardina pilchardus sardina, and Blackmouth Angler Lophiomus setigerus (Nakazono 1993; Yoneda et al. 1998; Ganias et al. 2004).

Perhaps most diagnostic, we estimated that the G of secondary growth oocytes (37 µm/d) was rapid enough to yield multiple batches within an estimated 86-d spawning season. Although there are few published values of secondary oocyte G, some comparisons are available from higher-latitude fishes. For two species from the British Isles, reported G-values were approximately 3.2 µm/d for Sole Solea solea (based upon an increase in mean diameter over 143 d; Witthames and Greer-Walker 1995) and approximately 1.3 µm/d for Atlantic Mackerel Scomber scombrus (Greer-Walker et al. 1994). In both cases, secondary oocyte development proceeded slowly enough that de novo vitellogenesis could not occur within the spawning season; hence, the fecundity type was considered determinate.

FIGURE 5.

Regression of mean secondary oocyte diameter (µm) per individual female Gray Triggerfish against day of collection within the 2012 spawning season (day 1 = May 11).

f05_338.jpg

Gray Triggerfish exhibited traits that are common in capital-breeding species. Condition indices (HSI and K) peaked just before or close to the onset of spawning, followed by declines throughout the reproductive period, similar to observations in other species with a capital pattern (Alonso-Fernández and Saborido-Rey 2012). The HSI of Gray Triggerfish exceeded the GSI in all months, which emphasizes the importance of the liver for energy storage and mobilization (Htun-Hun 1978; Rinchard and Kestemont 2003). In more extreme capital-breeding species, the seasonal increase in condition indices may occur well outside of the reproductive period (e.g., Htun-Hun 1978; Yoneda et al. 2001; Alonso-Fernández and Saborido-Rey 2012). By contrast, income-breeding species lack seasonal patterns in condition indices or exhibit only weak seasonal patterns (e.g., Domínguez-Petit et al. 2010). Although we postulate that Gray Triggerfish are capital breeders, we cannot reject the possibility that food intake during the spawning season may partially provide the energy needed for egg production. However, the liver in Gray Triggerfish seems to be important for energy mobilization and may help to ensure that oocyte development proceeds even when energy intake is low (e.g., Allen and Wootton 1982; Alonso-Fernández and Saborido-Rey 2012) or when there is a hiatus in feeding during parental care.

FIGURE 6.

Regression of the number of secondary growth oocytes per gram of body weight in female Gray Triggerfish against day of collection within the 2012 spawning season (day 1 = May 11).

f06_338.jpg

FIGURE 7.

Regression of mean secondary oocyte diameter (µm) against mean postovulatory follicle (POF) area (µm2) in seven female Gray Triggerfish selected from 2001 samples (see text).

f07_338.jpg

We found that Gray Triggerfish in the Gulf show attributes of indeterminate fecundity associated with warmwater environments. However, the species also exhibits group-synchronous oocyte development and a capital breeding pattern associated with territoriality and female parental care—traits that are most often linked with determinate fecundity (McBride et al. 2015). Gray Triggerfish possibly show determinate fecundity elsewhere in their range, which extends from Nova Scotia to Argentina in the western Atlantic (Hoese and Moore 1998). Building on the review by McBride et al. (2015), our findings support a conclusion that such mixed reproductive attributes in fish may be more common than previously thought and may be predicted to occur in lower latitudes for species with energetically demanding accessory reproductive activities, such as female parental care.

Batch Fecundity

Our findings on the reproductive strategy of Gray Triggerfish in the Gulf support use of a fecundity methodology based upon batch size and spawning frequency. Application of an indeterminate fecundity methodology is the cautionary approach when there is uncertainty about a species' fecundity type (Gordo et al. 2008; Lowerre-Barbieri et al. 2011; Fitzhugh et al. 2012). However, female Gray Triggerfish are rarely sampled in OM or the hydrated oocyte stage, which is typically the basis for identifying a spawning batch. The difficulty of detecting OM in female Gray Triggerfish seems to be a common problem (Wilson et al. 1995; Hood and Johnson 1997; Moore 2001). This could be related to (1) the lack of oocyte hydration during proteolysis or (2) reduced feeding prior to spawning, such that females undergoing OM have a low susceptibility to hook-and-line capture (Wilson et al. 1995; Moore 2001; Simmons and Szedlmayer 2012). MacKichan and Szedlmayer (2007) reported an egg diameter of 620 ± 3 (mean ± SE) µm from Gray Triggerfish nest excavations, which is close to the mean diameter of ova (602 ± 0.72 µm) from the one female we detected as undergoing yolk coalescence and considered to be in spawning condition. In contrast, broadcast spawners with positively buoyant eggs, such as the Red Snapper Lutjanus campechanus, have an egg diameter of about 820 µm (Rabalais et al. 1980). A lack of oocyte hydration would result in a much shorter period during which to collect imminently spawning females, which in turn would lead to a low incidence of actively spawning individuals in sample collections. A similar difficulty occurs with the Mediterranean Sardine and is attributed to a relatively long (> 10-d) spawning interval (Ganias et al. 2004). Due to the infrequent capture of Gray Triggerfish undergoing OM, we used the spawning batch size separation method (Ganias et al. 2004) to calculate BF. The oocyte size hiatus that develops as the secondary growth oocytes advance provides the basis upon which to define the spawning batch.

TABLE 2.

Fecundity metrics and associated FL information for female Gray Triggerfish used in fecundity analysis (OFBW = ovary-free body weight; batch fecundity = number of secondary growth oocytes ≥ 250 µm in diameter within the ovary).

t02_338.gif

FIGURE 8.

Regression of potential batch fecundity against fork length (mm) of female Gray Triggerfish. Batch fecundity was defined as the number of secondary growth oocytes at least 250 µm in diameter within the ovary.

f08_338.jpg

Other investigators of Gray Triggerfish fecundity have applied various criteria based on oocyte size or stage to define the spawning batch. Ingram (2001) reported 400 µm as the diameter that delimited the beginning of a spawning batch based upon the assumption that this size corresponded to the onset of OM. Using this criterion, oocyte density was estimated as 8,015 ± 247 (mean ± SE) oocytes/g of ovary (Ingram 2001, cited in SEDAR 09 2006). However, we found no evidence of OM occurring for oocytes with diameters of 590 µm or less. The only imminently spawning female in our collections had a mean oocyte diameter of 602 ± 0.72 µm for oocytes undergoing OM. Given our finding that secondary oocyte development is group synchronous, the 400-µm criterion would likely identify only a partial batch. Hood and Johnson (1997) indicated that the spawning batch could be identified as the standing stock of vitellogenic oocytes within an ovary—essentially the same conclusion we made. Their results for BF ranged from 0.2 to 1.2 million eggs, with a density of 13,809 ± 6,122 (mean ± SE) oocytes/g of ovary. Our estimated oocyte density was 24,468 ± 1,086 oocytes/g of ovary, which was much higher than the estimates from either Hood and Johnson (1997) or Ingram (2001). The difference between our estimate and that of Ingram (2001) can be readily accounted for by the difference in the minimum oocyte size used to define a spawning batch (250 µm versus 400 µm). The difference between our oocyte density estimate and that calculated by Hood and Johnson (1997) is more difficult to explain, and we can only speculate that factors we did not account for (e.g., year or season effects) were important. Although there are other published estimates of Gray Triggerfish fecundity (Manooch and Raver 1984; Bernardes and Dias 2000), the details provided on methods and oocyte size or stage criteria for fecundity counts were not sufficient for a comparison with our results. The range of our BF estimates (0.34–2.0 million eggs) was similar to counts of eggs from nine nests (0.42–1.4 million eggs) examined by MacKichan-Simmons (2008).

Spawning Frequency

As found in many studies, spawning frequency can be difficult to assess due to low sample sizes and uneven sampling through the reproductive season (Stratoudakis et al. 2006; Ganias et al. 2011). Similar to the rarity of female Gray Triggerfish undergoing OM, the occurrence of females exhibiting POFs was comparatively low. This necessitated aggregation of the data across years, which assumes no year effect, such that the proportion of females bearing POFs could be used to calculate the spawning interval (7.6 d via the POF method). However, in one of the study years (2001), samples were evenly distributed over June and July and thus permitted spawning interval estimation via the ISI method (11 d). This estimate depends on two assumptions: (1) that POF degeneration offers a clock by which oocyte growth can be estimated, and the maximum POF surface area we observed (12 µm2) is representative of a new day-0 POF in Gray Triggerfish; and (2) that the relationship between the rate of POF degeneration and secondary oocyte growth is constant over the spawning season. We think the first assumption is reasonable based on the corresponding observations that cortical alveolar oocytes were the leading gamete stage and that provisioning of yolk for the subsequent batch had not yet begun. Furthermore, the relationship between POF degeneration and secondary oocyte growth was linear for our example from 2001. For the second assumption, there is evidence from the literature that POF degeneration and secondary oocyte growth are both temperature dependent (Kjesbu et al. 1998; Ganias 2012). We also expect that water temperature—and thus rates of POF degeneration and secondary oocyte growth—may change over a several-month-long spawning season. However, a simple assumption may be that any changes in the rate of oocyte growth are proportional to changes in the rate of POF degeneration. Further work is needed to test this assumption. For the purposes of the present paper, the POF and ISI methods were needed to support each other due to the low sample size of individuals that contained POFs. A study of Yellowmargin Triggerfish Pseudobalistes flavimarginatus found that spawning grounds were vacated for 10 d between spawns on Australia's Great Barrier Reef (Gladstone 1994). This would be similar to the 11-d spawning interval we calculated for Gray Triggerfish. Earlier estimates of spawning interval for this species vary greatly: from 15 to 37 d in the U.S. South Atlantic (Moore 2001) to 3.7 d in the Gulf (Ingram 2001).

Female Gray Triggerfish in the Gulf exhibited mixed reproductive attributes that were apparently associated with the warmwater environment and with the energetically demanding behaviors required for defense and parental care. Fecundity type in the Gulf should be considered indeterminate, and the hiatus in the size distribution of advancing secondary oocytes can be used to identify a spawning batch. Our estimated scope for the number of batches produced during a spawning season is lower (8–11 d) than that estimated elsewhere in the Gulf (c.f. Ingram 2001), but additional research is needed. In particular, age or size dependency in batch number will be difficult to assess due to the nesting behavior and parental care exhibited by Gray Triggerfish.

Further field collection efforts could improve estimates of Gray Triggerfish fecundity. Due to the nesting and territorial behavior of this species, scuba and spearfishing are necessary to readily identify and collect females that are in spawning condition. A survey could be designed to improve our knowledge of the timing and duration of spawning markers by targeting prespawn and postspawn females in conjunction with (1) visual observations of color phase and the size of females on nests and (2) measurements of environmental variables (perhaps most importantly, water temperature).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Steve Theberge and Jenny Ragland for taking high-resolution scans of whole-mount oocytes and to Steve Theberge for measuring POF surface area from histology slides. In addition, we thank Doug DeVries, Patrick Raley, and Chris Gardner for aiding in the capture of Gray Triggerfish in the field; and Bill Walling for the collection of Gray Triggerfish biological samples at Panama City fish houses. Funding for this project was partially provided by the Marine Fisheries Initiative Program.

REFERENCES

1.

J. R. M. Allen , and R. J. Wootton . 1982. The effect of ration and temperature on the growth of the Three-spined Stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. Journal of Fish Biology 20:409–422. Google Scholar

2.

A. Alonso-Fernández , and F. Saborido-Rey . 2012. Relationship between energy allocation and reproductive strategy in Trisopterus luscus. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 416–417:8–16. Google Scholar

3.

F. Arocha 2002. Oocyte development and maturity classification of Swordfish from the north-western Atlantic. Journal of Fish Biology 60:13–27. Google Scholar

4.

R. A. Bernardes , and J. F. Dias . 2000. Aspectos da reproducao do peixe-porco, Balistes capriscus (Gmelin) (Actinopterygii, Tetraodontiformes, Balistidae) coletado na costa sul do Estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. [Observations about the reproduction of the Grey Triggerfish, Balistes capriscus (Gmelin) (Actinopterygli, Tetraodontiformes, Balistidae) collected from the southern coast of the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil.] Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 17:687–696. Google Scholar

5.

R. Domínguez-Petit , F. Saborido-Rey , and I. Medina . 2010. Changes in proximate composition, energy storage and condition of European Hake (Merluccius merluccius, L. 1758) through the spawning season. Fisheries Research 104:73–82. Google Scholar

6.

J. M. Donelson , M. I. McCormick , and P. L. Munday . 2008. Parental condition affects early life-history of a coral reef fish. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 360:109–116. Google Scholar

7.

G. R. Fitzhugh , K. W. Shertzer , G. T. Kellison , and D. M. Wyanski . 2012. Review of size- and age-dependence in batch spawning: implications for stock assessment of fish species exhibiting indeterminate fecundity. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 110:413–425. Google Scholar

8.

R. Foucher , and R. Beamish . 1980. Production of nonviable oocytes by Pacific Hake (Merluccius productus). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37:41–48. Google Scholar

9.

K. Ganias 2012. Thirty years of using the postovulatory follicles method: overview, problems and alternatives. Fisheries Research 117–118:63–74. Google Scholar

10.

K. Ganias , C. Nunes , T. Vavalidis , M. Rakka , and Y. Stratoudakis . 2011. Estimating oocyte growth rate and its potential relationship to spawning frequency in teleosts with indeterminate fecundity. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science [online serial] 3:119–126. Google Scholar

11.

K. Ganias , S. Somarakis , A. Machias , and A. Theodorou . 2004. Pattern of oocyte development and batch fecundity in the Mediterranean Sardine. Fisheries Research 67:13–24. Google Scholar

12.

W. Gladstone 1994. Lek-like spawning, parental care and mating periodicity of the Triggerfish Pseudobalistes flavimarginatus (Balistidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 39:249–257. Google Scholar

13.

L. Gordo , A. Costa , P. Abaunza , P. Lucio , A. T. G. W. Eltink , and I. Figueiredo . 2008. Determinate versus indeterminate fecundity in Horse Mackerel. Fisheries Research 89:181–185. Google Scholar

14.

M. Greer-Walker , P. R. Witthames , and I. Bautista de los Santos . 1994. Is the fecundity of the Atlantic Mackerel (Scomber scombrus: Scombridae) determinate? Sarsia 79:13–26. Google Scholar

15.

P. J. Harris , D. M. Wyanski , D. B. White , and J. L. Moore . 2002. Age, growth, and reproduction of Scamp, Mycteroperca phenax, in the southwestern North Atlantic, 1979–1997. Bulletin of Marine Science 70:113–132. Google Scholar

16.

H. Hoese , and R. H. Moore . 1998. Fishes of the Gulf of Mexico, 2nd edition. Texas A&M University Press, College Station. Google Scholar

17.

P. B. Hood , and A. K. Johnson . 1997. A study of the age structure, growth, maturity schedules and fecundity of Gray Triggerfish (Balistes capriscus), Red Porgy (Pagrus pagrus), and Vermilion Snapper (Rhomboplites aurorubens) from the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Marine Fisheries Initiative, Final Report FO499-95-F, St. Petersburg, Florida. Google Scholar

18.

M. Htun-Hun 1978. The reproductive biology of the Dab Limanda limanda (L.) in the North Sea: gonadosomatic index, hepatosomatic index, and condition factor. Journal of Fish Biology 13:369–378. Google Scholar

19.

J. R. Hunter , B. J. Macewicz , N. C. H. Lo , and C. A. Kimbrell . 1992. Fecundity, spawning, and maturity of female Dover Sole Microstomus pacificus, with an evaluation of assumptions and precision. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 90:101–128. Google Scholar

20.

G. W. Ingram 2001. Stock structure of Gray Triggerfish, Balistes capriscus, on multiple spatial scales in the Gulf of Mexico. Doctoral dissertation. University of South Alabama, Mobile. Google Scholar

21.

M. W. Jackson , D. L. Nieland , and J. H. Cowan . 2006. Diel spawning periodicity of Red Snapper Lutjanus campechanus in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Fish Biology 68:695–706. Google Scholar

22.

H. I. Jager , K. A. Rose , and A. Vila-Gispert . 2008. Life history correlates and extinction risk of capital-breeding fishes. Hydrobiologia 602:15–25. Google Scholar

23.

K. I. Jönsson 1997. Capital and income breeding as alternative tactics of resource use in reproduction. Oikos 78:57–66. Google Scholar

24.

H. Kawase 2003. Spawning behavior and biparental egg care of the Crosshatch Triggerfish, Xanthichthys mento (Balistidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 66:211–219. Google Scholar

25.

O. S. Kjesbu , P. R. Witthames , P. Solemdal , and M. Greer-Walker . 1998. Temporal variations in the fecundity of Arcto-Norwegian cod (Gadus morhua) in response to natural changes in food and temperature. Journal of Sea Research 40:303–321. Google Scholar

26.

T. Kuwamura 1997. Evolution of female egg care in haremic triggerfish, Rhinecanthus aculeatus. Ethology 103:1015–1023. Google Scholar

27.

Y. Lambert 2008. Why should we closely monitor fecundity in marine fish populations? Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science 41:93–106. Google Scholar

28.

S. K. Lowerre-Barbieri , N. J. Brown-Peterson , H. Murua , J. Tomkiewicz , D. M. Wyanski , and F. Saborido-Rey . 2011. Emerging issues and methodological advances in fisheries reproductive biology. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science [online serial] 3:71–91. Google Scholar

29.

C. A. MacKichan , and S. T. Szedlmayer . 2007. Reproductive behavior of the Gray Triggerfish, Balistes capriscus, in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fish Institute 59:214–217. Google Scholar

30.

C. A. MacKichan-Simmons 2008. Gray Triggerfish, Balistes capriscus, reproductive behavior, early life history, and competitive interactions between Red Snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Doctoral dissertation. Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama. Google Scholar

31.

C. S. Manooch III , and D. Raver Jr . 1984. Fisherman's guide: fishes of the southeastern United States. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh. Google Scholar

32.

R. S. McBride , S. Somarakis , G. R. Fitzhugh , A. Albert , N. A. Yaragina , M. J. Wuenschel , A. Alonso-Fernández , and G. Bailone . 2015. Energy acquisition and allocation to egg production in relation to fish reproductive strategies. Fish and Fisheries 16:23–57. Google Scholar

33.

J. L. Moore 2001. Age, growth and reproductive biology of the Gray Triggerfish (Balistes capriscus) from the southeastern United States, 1992–1997. Master's thesis. University of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina. Google Scholar

34.

H. Murua , and F. Saborido-Rey . 2003. Female reproductive strategies of marine fish species of the North Atlantic. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Science 33:23–31. Google Scholar

35.

A. Nakazono 1993. One-parent removal experiment in the brood-caring damselfish, Acanthochromis polyacanthus, with preliminary data on reproductive biology. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 44:699–707. Google Scholar

36.

P. Ofori-Danson 1990. Reproductive ecology of the triggerfish, Balistes capriscus, from the Ghanaian coastal waters. Tropical Ecology 31:1–11. Google Scholar

37.

K. Parker 1980. A direct method for estimating Northern Anchovy, Engraulis mordax, spawning biomass. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Bulletin 78:541–544. Google Scholar

38.

G. J. Paulik 1973. Studies of the possible form of the stock-recruitment curve. Rapports et Proces-Verbaux des Reunions du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer 164:302–315. Google Scholar

39.

N. N. Rabalais , S. C. Rabalais , and C. R. Arnold . 1980. Description of eggs and larvae of laboratory reared Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus). Copeia 1980:704–708. Google Scholar

40.

W. E. Ricker 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Fisheries Research Board of Canada Bulletin 191. Google Scholar

41.

J. Rinchard , and P. Kestemont . 2003. Liver changes related to oocyte growth in Roach, a single spawner fish, and in Bleak and White Bream, two multiple spawner fish. International Review of Hydrobiology 88:68–76. Google Scholar

42.

R. N. Santos , S. Amadio , and E. J. G. Ferreira . 2010. Patterns of energy allocation to reproduction in three Amazonian fish species. Neotropical Ichthyology 8:155–162. Google Scholar

43.

SEDAR (Southeast Data Assessment and Review) 09. 2006. Stock assessment report of Gray Triggerfish in the Gulf. SEDAR, Charleston, South Carolina. Google Scholar

44.

C. M. Simmons , and S. T. Szedlmayer . 2012. Territoriality, reproductive behavior, and parental care in Gray Triggerfish, Balistes capriscus, from the northern Gulf of Mexico. Bulletin of Marine Science 88:197–209. Google Scholar

45.

S. C. Stearns 1992. The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. Google Scholar

46.

Y. Stratoudakis , M. Bernal , K. Ganias , and A. Uriarte . 2006. The daily egg production method (DEPM): recent advances, current applications and future challenges. Fish and Fisheries 7:35–57. Google Scholar

47.

J. Tomkiewicz , M. J. Morgan , J. Burnett , and F. Saborido-Rey . 2003. Available information for estimating reproductive potential of northwest Atlantic groundfish stocks. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science 33:1–21. Google Scholar

48.

R. A. Wallace , and K. Selman . 1981. Cellular and dynamic aspects of oocyte growth in teleosts. American Zoologist 21:325–343. Google Scholar

49.

C. A. Wilson , D. L. Nieland , and A. L. Stanley . 1995. Age, growth, and reproductive biology of Gray Triggerfish (Balistes capriscus) from the northern Gulf of Mexico commercial harvest. Marine Fisheries Initiative, Final Report 8, St. Petersburg, Florida. Google Scholar

50.

P. R. Witthames , and M. Greer-Walker . 1995. Determinacy of fecundity and oocyte atresia in Sole (Solea solea) from the channel, the North Sea and the Irish Sea. Aquatic Living Resources 8:91–109. Google Scholar

51.

P. R. Witthames , A. Thorson , H. Murua , F. Saborido-Rey , L. N. Greenwood , R. Domínguez , M. Korta , and O. S. Kjesbu . 2009. Advances in methods for determining fecundity: application of the new methods to some marine fishes. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 107:148–164. Google Scholar

52.

M. Yoneda , M. Tokimura , H. Fujita , N. Takeshita , K. Takeshita , M. Matsuyama , and S. Matsuura . 1998. Ovarian structure and batch fecundity in Lophiomus setigerus. Journal of Fish Biology 52:94–106. Google Scholar

53.

M. Yoneda , M. Tokimura , H. Fujita , N. Takeshita , K. Takeshita , M. Matsuyama , and S. Matsuura . 2001. Reproductive cycle, fecundity, and seasonal distribution of the Anglerfish Lophius litulon in the East China and Yellow seas. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 99:356–370. Google Scholar

Notes

[1] This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.

© Erik T. Lang and Gary R. Fitzhugh
Erik T. Lang "Oogenesis and Fecundity Type of Gray Triggerfish in the Gulf of Mexico," Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science 7(7), 338-348, (1 January 2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2015.1069428
Received: 10 October 2014; Accepted: 27 June 2015; Published: 1 January 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES


Share
SHARE
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top