Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 October 2022 Iodictyum akaishiensis sp. nov.: A New Miocene Phidoloporid (Bryozoa, Cheilostomata) from the Moniwa Formation, Sendai, Japan
Shinji Arakawa
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A new Miocene phidoloporid, Iodictyum akaishiensis sp. nov., was collected from the Moniwa Formation (Langhian) near the Akaishi Bridge, Sendai City, Japan. It is the first fossil record of Iodictyum in Japan, and the fifth discovery of Miocene fossils of the genus from the Indo-Pacific area. The species resembles some Recent species from the western Pacific, especially in the large marginal pores, an open peristomial sinus and shaft, and subtriangular ooecial labellum. The characteristics of Iodictyum from Eocene to Recent are compared, and the trend of evolution in the genus is inferred.

Introduction

Iodictyum Harmer, 1933 is one of 26 genera in the cheilostomatous bryozoan family Phidoloporidae Gabb and Horn, 1862 (Bock, 2017). This family had been historically mainly treated under the invalid name Reteporidae Smitt, 1868 (see discussion in Gordon, 1989), and is well known for including many species of fenestrate erect colonies. In Japanese, it has been called the “Amikokemushi” group (Mawatari, 1965), meaning the reticular bryozoans.

Although some of the Recent species, such as Iodictyum axillare (Ortmann, 1890) and I. sanguineum (Ortmann, 1890), are well known in Japan, no fossil of Iodictyum has been described from there. Among the previous studies in Japan, only Schizoretepora tumescens (Ortmann, 1890) and S. tamagawensis Zágoršek, Takashima and Hirose, 2015 have been described from Japan (Hayami, 1971, 1975; Nishizawa and Sakagami, 1986; Nishizawa, 1987; Zágoršek et al., 2015), and other phidoloporids have been only listed as indeterminable species (Hayami, 1980, 1981; Arakawa, 1995). One of the reasons for the rarity of fossil records is their generally poor preservation, resulting from post-mortem transportation in most phidoloporid fossils. Especially, the frontal wall of the ovicell, a key character in the identification of phidoloporid genera, is easily broken.

In 2017, I visited a riverside outcrop of the Moniwa Formation near the Akaishi Bridge (known as “Kita-Akaishi”), Sendai City, Miyagi Prefecture, a famous locality for Miocene fossils, and found only one well-preserved fossil of Iodictyum. After comparison with fossil and Recent species of the genus, I concluded that this is a new bryozoan species.

This is only the fifth record of Miocene Iodictyum from the Indo–Pacific area. The first study was made by Brown (1952) who proposed two species, I. acanthoides Brown, 1952 (Serravallian) and I. ligarense Brown, 1952 (Burdigalian) from New Zealand. The third species is I. megapora Guha and Gopikrishna, 2007, from the Aquitanian of India (Guha and Gopikrishna, 2007). Filiflustrella pacifica Stoliczka, 1865, from the Burdigalian of New Zealand was placed in Iodictyum by Gordon et al. (2009), representing the fourth species. Brown (1958) reported one more species, Iodictyum sp., but its ovicell was not found. This species is not counted here.

Thus, I here provide a description of this new Iodictyum species, which may contribute to the study of the evolution and radiation in the genus.

Geological setting and bryozoan fauna

The Moniwa Formation comprises the lower part of the Natori Group distributed in the southwestern part of the Sendai Plain. The Natori Group consists of the Tsukinoki, Takadate, Moniwa, Hatatate and Tsunaki formations in ascending order (Kitamura et al., 1986). Volcanic rocks (mainly andesite and andesitic breccia) of the Takadate Formation are unconformably overlain by the basal conglomerate of the Moniwa Formation around the locality of this study. Nomura and Maeda (2008), who studied the taphonomy of fossil barnacles in these two formations, interpreted their boundary as a ravinement surface, based on autochthonous barnacles and abundant perforation by stone borers on the boulder surface. The Moniwa Formation is composed mainly of coarse-grained sandstone and conglomerate, and conformably overlain by fine-grained sandstone of the Hatatate Formation. The K–Ar age of the Takadate Formation was dated about 22 Ma for andesite lava, and about 15 to 13 Ma for basalt and dacite (Konda and Ueda, 1980; Uto et al., 1989). On the other hand, the biostratigraphy of the Moniwa and Hatatate formations have been studied using planktonic foraminifers (Saito, 1963; Oda and Sakai, 1977; Ibaraki, 1981; Kitamura et al., 1986; Shimamoto et al., 2001; Fujiwara et al., 2008; Idehara et al., 2013), diatom (Maruyama, 1984; Yanagisawa, 1999), calcareous nannofossils (Honda, 1982; Yanagisawa, 1999) and radiolarians (Oda and Sakai, 1977). The Moniwa Formation is interpreted as the N8 to N9 planktonic foraminiferal zone of Blow (1969), and the CN3 to 4 calcareous nannofossil zone of Okada and Bukry (1980). Therefore, the age of the Moniwa Formation is assigned to the Langhian (see Suzuki et al., 2019).

The Moniwa Formation yields abundant fossils, such as foraminifers, sponges, corals, bryozoans, brachiopods, molluscs, ostracods, barnacles, crabs, echinoids, etc. According to Kitamura et al. (1986), the benthic foraminifers mainly indicate deposition in the lower sublittoral zone. Masuda (1969) and Sato (1991) compared molluscan assemblages of the fossil localities, and concluded that the Moniwa Formation at “Kita-Akaishi” was deposited in a rocky or gravelly tidal to shallow marine zone. Saijo (2010) listed the fauna at the sampling locality of this study.

The presence of bryozoan fossils in the Moniwa Formation was referred to in early studies (e.g. Nomura, 1940). Only Hayami (1976) has described the bryozoans, listing 27 species of cheilostomes from the vicinity of the type locality, eight of which were illustrated. Unfortunately, however, the whereabouts of Hayami's bryozoans are unknown. Most of the 27 cheilostomes are encrusting species, but Caberea hataii Okada, 1929, Microporina articulata (Fabricius, 1821) and Cellaria nanaoensis Hayami, 1973 form rooted erect colonies, and Membranipora arborescens (Canu and Bassler, 1928) (now in Biflustra or Acanthodesia) and Myriapora subgracilis (d'Orbigny, 1852) (as M. subgracila) are erect rigid species. These erect bryozoans may need to be taxonomically restudied.

Material and method

The study material is a colony of a fenestrated phidoloporid collected from an outcrop by the Natorigawa River immediately downstream from the Akaishi Bridge (Figure 1). It was broken into four parts during extraction. These were cleaned ultrasonically and in a hydrogen peroxide solution. After the cleaning, specimens were mounted on aluminum stubs with adhesive tape, for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation. They were Au-coated in an ion coater (model SC-701, Sanyu Denshi) and observed with a JSM-5310 microscope (JEOL) at the Department of Geology and Paleontology, National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba. Type material is deposited in the Paleontological Collection of the Department of Geology and Paleontology, National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba (collection code NMNS PA).

Zooidal characters were measured from SEM images taken at about 485 × magnification. Measurements (in millimeters) are presented as the range, followed by the arithmetic mean and standard deviation. Sample sizes (n) are given as the number of zooids from which a character was measured. Abbreviations used for characters measured are as follows: ZL, autozooid length; ZW, autozooid width; OrL, orifice length; OrW, orifice width; OvL, ovicell length; OvW, ovicell width; AvL, avicularium length; AvW, avicularium width.

Systematic description

Order Cheilostomatida Busk, 1852
Suborder Flustrina Smitt, 1868
Superfamily Celleporoidea Johnston, 1838
Family Phidoloporidae Gabb and Horn, 1862
Genus Iodictyum Harmer, 1933

  • Type species.Retepora phoenicea Busk, 1854.

  • Diagnosis.—Colony usually fenestrate. Frontal wall without pseudopores, with or without marginal pores. Primary orifice generally sinuate with condyles, immersed within a peristome. Peristome at first projecting; secondary orifice sinuate or bearing a pseudospiramen, sometimes marginally denticulate. Oral spines absent. Avicularia present or absent, frontal or fenestral, rarely peristomial. Ovicell usually having a proximal labellum flanked by lateral sinus. (see Discussion)

  • Figure 1.

    The sampling locality of the holotype material of Iodictyum akaishiensis sp. nov. A, northern Honshu and Miyagi Prefecture; B, Sendai City and the sampling locality; C, detail of the sampling locality and geology around the Akaishi Bridge based on Saijo (2010).

    img-z3-1_25.jpg

    Iodictyum akaishiensis sp. nov.
    Figures 24
     ZooBank lsid: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:14892537-5AC8-48E4-97B8-5DEB9D0099C3

  • Diagnosis.Iodictyum bearing large marginal pores, open peristomial sinus, massive orificial condyles, triangular frontal avicularia near the median line of zooid, directed proximolaterally, and ovicell with tapering median labellum that creates an M-shaped proximal margin.

  • Etymology.—Species name alludes to the name of the type locality, the Akaishi Bridge.

  • Type material.—Holotype, NMNS PA 18692, Moniwa Formation, near Akaishi Bridge, Sendai City, Miyagi Prefecture, Japan, consisting of four fragments A to D originated from a single colony.

  • Type locality.—About 70 m east of the Akaishi Bridge (38°12′54.7″N, 140°45′21.5″E), the left side of the Natorigawa River, Moniwa, Taihaku Ward, Sendai City, Miyagi Prefecture, Japan, middle Miocene Moniwa Formation (Langhian).

  • Measurements (in millimeters).—NMNS PA 18692. Autozooids (n=81, 1): ZL, 0.37–0.57 (0.461±0.040); ZW, 0.18–0.36 (0.246±0.029); OrL, 0.08–0.13 (0.108±0.012); OrW, 0.08–0.12 (0.103±0.009). Avicularia (n=13, 1): AvL, 0.10–0.17 (0.140±0.019); AvW,

  • 0.06–0.11 (0.087 ± 0.010). Ovicell (n = 18, 1): OvL, 0.15–0.26 (0.205 ± 0.030); OvW, 0.16–0.22 (0.194 ± 0.016).

  • Description.—Colony erect, reticulate; trabeculae consisting of 3 to 7 autozooidal series (Figure 2). Fenestrae generally oval, 0.85 mm long and 0.41 mm wide on average. Zooids hexagonal. Frontal a little convex, almost smooth, with 4 to 6 large marginal pores (Figure 3A, B). Primary orifice keyhole-shaped, longer than wide, immersed in the peristome and thick frontal wall; rarely a pair of very large condyles preserved (Figure 3D); peristome not especially projecting, with a U-shaped sinus. Oral spines absent. Frontal avicularia occasionally present near the median line of zooid, directed proximolaterally; mandibular portion of rostrum triangular; pivot bar narrow, complete (Figure 3A, C). Intrafenestral avicularium rarely present, situated at the proximal end of the fenestrae, about 0.15 mm long, directed laterally; mandibular portion of rostrum triangular, some rostral tip curved upward along the wall of fenestra, pivot bar lacking (Figure 4B, C). Ovicell globular, almost smooth, with a subtriangular tapering median labellum and indentations either side that create an M-shaped proximal margin to the ovicell; a tiny median pore also present in the distal part of the labellum (Figure 3B).

  • Remarks.—This species resembles three Recent species of the genus in Japan, Iodictyum axillare (Ortmann, 1890), I. sanguineum (Ortmann, 1890) and I. deliciosum (Buchner, 1924), and is also similar to I. willeyi Harmer, 1934, ranging from Indonesia to Australia, and I. spicatum Harmer, 1934, from the Torres Strait. All of these species and I. akaishiensis sp. nov. have salient marginal pores and frontal avicularia directed proximally to proximolaterally, and a pseudospiramen is not formed. Especially, I. sanguineum and I. willeyi also have an ovicell with a proximally tapering subtriangular ooecial labellum and a median pore, as in the new species (Harmer, 1934; Hayward, 2004). However, I. akaishiensis sp. nov. is distinguished from the other species by the shape of avicularia. The mandibular portion of rostrum is short in the frontal avicularia of I. sanguineum, and the large fenestral avicularium is spatulate in both I. sanguineum and I. willeyi.

  • Among six fossil species of Iodictyum (see Bock, 2016), I. acanthoides Brown, 1952, from the Miocene of New Zealand resembles I. akaishiensis sp. nov. in the subtriangular labellum and the M-shaped proximal margin of the ovicell, but differs in the smaller marginal pores and small rounded avicularia. Iodictyum megapora Guha and Gopikrishna, 2007, from the Miocene of India is somewhat similar to I. akaishiensis sp. nov. in having large marginal pores and a subtriangular labellum, but has a pseudospiraminal pore and no avicularia.

  • Occurrence.—Known only from the type locality, middle Miocene (Langhian).

  • Figure 2.

    Holotype of Iodictyum akaishiensis sp. nov. A, NMNS PA 18692A; B, NMNS PA 18692B; C, NMNS PA 18692C; D, NMNS PA 18692D. Scale bars: 500 µm.

    img-z4-1_25.jpg

    Figure 3.

    Close up of zooids, orifices, avicularia and ovicells of Iodictyum akaishiensis sp. nov., holotype. A, autozooids with frontal avicularia (NMNS PA 18692A); B, ovicellate zooids (NMNS PA 18692A); C, pivot bar of frontal avicularium (arrow) (NMNS PA 18692B); D, primary orifice with a pair of very large condyles (arrows) and U-shaped peristomial sinus with sinus shaft (NMNS PA 18692C). Scale bars: 200 µm in A, B, 100 µm in C, 20 µm in D.

    img-z5-1_25.jpg

    Figure 4.

    Dorsal surface of colony and fenestral avicularium of Iodictyum akaishiensis sp. nov. (NMNS PA 18692B), holotype. A, dorsal surface of colony; B, fenestral avicularium (arrow) with upward curving tip; C, fenestral avicularium showing distinct outline. Scale bars: 500 µm in A, 100 µm in B and C.

    img-z6-1_25.jpg

    Discussion

    The present new species is assigned to the genus Iodictyum, although the marginal denticulation of peristome was not observed. It is the first fossil record of Iodictyum in Japan.

    According to Harmer's (1933) original concept of the genus, Iodictyum has: (1) fenestrate colonies with rare exceptions, (2) a peristome at first projecting (less so with the secondary calcification), with marginal teeth or internal denticles, (3) no oral spines, and (4) an ovicell with a free tongue or labellum, a median carina (= longitudinal ridge) and usually a minute pore. In the report of the Siboga Expedition, he stated that the genera in Reteporidae (= Phidoloporidae) are distinguished mainly by the characters of the ovicells (Harmer, 1934). However, both the shape and the development of the ooecial labellum are diverse. Species may lack a labellum, e.g. Iodictyum bicuspidatum Gordon and d'Hondt, 1997. On the other hand, it is known that other genera in Phidoloporidae also have ovicells with a subtriangular labellum. For example, Reteporellina babelensis (Chapman, 1941) bears not only a longitudinal fissure but also a minute pore distal to the labellum (Hayward, 2004). To my best knowledge, the mode of ovicell formation in Iodictyum shown by Harmer (1934), which starts with a longitudinal median sinus as in Schizoretepora, can be reasonably applied to other genera.

    Although Harmer (1933, 1934) did not emphasize the absence of suboral or peristomial avicularia, his “labial avicularia” constitute one of the distinct characters in Iodictyum. Genera such as Reteporella and Reteporellina include many species with “labial avicularia”. In contrast, such avicularia are absent in most species in Iodictyum, although I. trochus Gordon and d'Hondt, 1997 has peristomial avicularia.

    Therefore, the diagnosis of Iodictyum may be said to include the absence of oral spines and rarity of suboral or peristomial avicularia, as well as having a well-developed ooecial labellum flanked by lateral sinus. However, there is ambiguity in the difference among three genera, Iodictyum, Reteporella, and Reteporellina (Table 1). Zágoršek (2010) suggested in his generic diagnosis that Iodictyum may have no labial avicularia. In this study, I avoid making any conclusions on this problem, because no definite evidence was supplied.

    On the other hand, Harmer (1933, 1934) divided Iodictyum into “Section A” with brilliantly coloured colonies and “Section B” with white colonies. The former has large marginal pores, a thickly chitinized operculum and symmetrical ovicellular sinus. Although the colour of I. akaishiensis sp. nov. in life is not known, all the above five similar Recent species are included in Harmer's “Section A”. The discovery of I. akaishiensis sp. nov. demonstrates that this species group had already radiated in the Indo–Pacific region by the middle Miocene.

    Table 1.

    Comparison between Iodictyum, Reteporella and Reteporellina. (* Reteporellina projecta Gordon and d'Hondt, 1997, with oral spines)

    img-z7-2_25.gif

    However, the oldest species of the genus Iodictyum, I. rubeschi (Reuss, 1848) and I. labellatum Zágoršek, 2001, from the latest Eocene (Priabonian) of Hungary do not have salient marginal pores (Zágoršek, 2001). The long median suture lines of their ovicells rather resemble those of Reteporella and Reteporellina. A similar structure is restricted to the proximal part of the ovicell in most Recent species of Iodictyum. An exception is I. illinguum Gordon and d'Hondt, 1997, from New Caledonia. Thus, I infer that the diminution of the occluded median sinus of the ovicell had occurred in Iodictyum during the radiation from Europe to the Indo-Pacific area. Further discovery of well-preserved fossils of this genus is still required.

    Acknowledgements

    I express sincere gratitude to Dennis P. Gordon of the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (Wellington) and Kamil Zágoršek of the Technical University of Liberec (Liberec) for their reading of the manuscript and critical advice; and reviewers for their helpful comments. I also thank Yasunari Shigeta and Takuma Haga of National Museum of Nature and Science (Tsukuba) for permission to use the SEM and also for cataloging and storing the study material in the museum.

    References

    1.

    Arakawa, S., 1995: Bryozoan Fauna in the Jizodo Formation (Pleistocene), Boso Peninsula, Honshu, Japan. Natural History Research , vol. 3, p. 75–110. Google Scholar

    2.

    Blow, W. H., 1969: Late Middle Eocene to Recent planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy. In , Brönniann, P. and Renz, H. H. eds., Proceeding of the First International Conference on Planktonic Microfossils, Geneva, 1967 , no. 1, p. 199–422. E. J. Brill, Leiden. Google Scholar

    3.

    Bock, P. E., 2016: Iodictyum Harmer, 1933 [online]. [Cited 5 March 2019]. Available from:  https://bryozoa.net/cheilostomata/phidoloporidae/iodictyum.htmlGoogle Scholar

    4.

    Bock, P. E., 2017: Phidoloporidae Gabb and Horn, 1862 [online]. [Cited 7 April 2019]. Available from:  https://bryozoa.net/cheilostomata/phidoloporidae/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

    5.

    Brown, D. A., 1952: The Tertiary cheilostomatous Polyzoa of New Zealand, xii + 405 p. Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), London. Google Scholar

    6.

    Brown, D. A., 1958: Fossil Cheilostomatous Polyzoa from Southwest Victoria , 89 p. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Victoria, no. 20, 90 p. Mines Department, Victoria State Government, Melbourne. Google Scholar

    7.

    Buchner, P., 1924: Studien über den Polymorphismus der Bryozoen. 1. Anatomische und systematische Untersuchungen an japanischen Reteporiden. Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abteilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere , vol. 48, p. 155–216. Google Scholar

    8.

    Busk, G., 1852: An account of the Polyzoa, and sertularian zoophytes, collected in the voyage of the Rattlesnake, on the coasts of Australia and the Louisiade Archipelago. In , MacGillivray, J. ed., Narrative of the Voyage of H.M.S. Rattlesnake, commanded by the late Captain Owen Stanley, R.N., F.R.S. & c. during the years 1846–1850 , vol. 1, p. 343–402. T. & W. Boone, London. Google Scholar

    9.

    Busk, G., 1854: Catalogue of Marine Polyzoa in the Collection of the British Museum, II. Cheilostomata (part) , p. 55–120, pl. 69–124, Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), London. Google Scholar

    10.

    Canu, F. and Bassler, R. S., 1928: Les Bryozoaires du Maroc et de Mauritanie, 2me mémoire. Mémoires de la Société des Sciences Naturelles du Maroc , no. 18, p. 1–85. Google Scholar

    11.

    Chapman, F., 1941: Report on foraminiferal soundings and dredgings of the F. I. S. ‘Endeavour’ along the continental shelf of the south-east coast of Australia. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia , vol. 65, p. 145–211. Google Scholar

    12.

    Fabricius, O., 1821: Nye Zoologiske Bidrag. Videnskabernes Selskabs physiske Skrifter , no. 1, p. 23–80. Google Scholar

    13.

    Fujiwara, O., Yanagisawa, Y., Irizuki, T., Shimamoto, M., Hayashi, H., Danhara, T. et al., 2008: Chronological data for the Middle Miocene to Pliocene sequence around the southwestern Sendai Plain, with special reference to the uplift history of the Ou Backbone Range. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Japan , vol. 59, p. 423–438. Google Scholar

    14.

    Gabb, W. M. and Horn, G. H., 1862: The fossil Polyzoa of the Secondary and Tertiary Formations of North America. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, ser. 2 , vol. 5, p. 111–179. Google Scholar

    15.

    Gordon, D. P., 1989: The marine fauna of New Zealand: Bryozoa: Gymnolaemata (Cheilostomida, Ascophorina) from the western South Island continental shelf and slope. New Zealand Oceanographic Institute Memoir , no. 97, p. 1–158. Google Scholar

    16.

    Gordon, D. P. and Hondt, J. L., d', 1997: Bryozoa: Lepraliomorpha and other Ascophorina, mainly from New Caledonian waters. In , Crosnier, A. ed., Résultats des Campagnes MUSORSTOM, vol. 18 (Mémoir du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle , vol. 176), p. 9–124. Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris. Google Scholar

    17.

    Gordon, D. P., Taylor, P. D. and Bigey, F. P., 2009: Phylum Bryozoa, moss animals, sea mats, lace corals. In , Gordon, D. P. ed., New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity. Volume One. Animalia. Radiata, Lophotrochozoa, Deuterostomia , p. 271–297. Canterbury University Press, Canterbury. Google Scholar

    18.

    Guha, A. K. and Gopikrishna, K., 2007: Some fossil ascophoran bryozoan taxa from Tertiary sequences of western Kachchh, Gujarat. Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India , vol. 52, p. 195–222. Google Scholar

    19.

    Harmer, S. F., 1933: The genera of Reteporidae. Proceeding of the Zoological Society of London 1933 , p. 615–627. Google Scholar

    20.

    Harmer, S. F., 1934: The Polyzoa of the Siboga Expedition. Part III. Cheilostomata Ascophora, I. Family Reteporidae. Siboga Expeditie, monographie 28c, p. 502–640 (+ i–vii). Google Scholar

    21.

    Hayami, T., 1971: On some Bryozoa from near Namioka-cho, Minami-Tsugaru-gun, Aomori Prefecture, Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, n. ser., no. 84, p. 196–204. Google Scholar

    22.

    Hayami, T., 1973: The genus Cellaria (Cheilostomatous Bryozoa) from the Neogene sediments of northern Japan. Science Reports of the Tohoku University, Second Series (Geology) , Special Volume, no. 6 (Hatai Memorial Volume),p. 391–400. Google Scholar

    23.

    Hayami, T., 1975: Neogene Bryozoa from Northern Japan. Science Reports of the Tohoku University, Second Series (Geology) , vol. 45, p. 83–126. Google Scholar

    24.

    Hayami, T., 1976: Cheilostomatous Bryozoa from the Moniwa Formation. Saito Ho-on Kai Museum Research Bulletin , no. 44, p. 39–51. Google Scholar

    25.

    Hayami, T., 1980: Preliminary Reports on Cheilostomata (Bryozoa) from the Ananai Formation (Pliocene). In , Taira, A. and Tashiro, M. eds., Geology and Paleontology of the Shimanto Belt—Selected Papers in Honor of Prof. Jiro Katto , p. 37–42. Rinya-kosaikai Press, Kochi. Google Scholar

    26.

    Hayami, T., 1981: The Pliocene cheilostomatous Bryozoa from Shikoku on the Pacific coast of Japan. In , Larwood, G. P. and Nielsen, C. eds., Recent and Fossil Bryozoa , p. 105–112. Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg. Google Scholar

    27.

    Hayward, P. J., 2004: Taxonomic studies on some Indo–West Pacific Phidoloporidae (Bryozoa: Cheilostomata). Systematics and Biodiversity , vol. 1, p. 305–326. Google Scholar

    28.

    Honda, N., 1982: Upper Cenozoic calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of the Pacific side of Japan. Proceeding of the 89th Annual Meeting of the Geological Society of Japan (1982 Niigata) , p. 178. ( in JapaneseGoogle Scholar

    29.

    Ibaraki, M., 1981: Planktonic foraminifera from “Lepidocyclina” and Miogypsina horizons in Japan. Fossils (The Palaeontological Society of Japan) , no. 30, p. 67–72. ( in JapaneseGoogle Scholar

    30.

    Idehara, Y., Hayashi, H., Fujiwara, O., Kumazawa, D. and Irizuki, T., 2013: Temporal changes of planktonic foraminiferal assemblages in the Middle Miocene Hatatate Formation along the Natori-gawa section, Sendai City, Northeast Honshu, Japan. Fossils (The Palaeontological Society of Japan) , no. 94, p. 5–18. ( in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    31.

    Johnston, G., 1838: A History of British Zoophytes , xii + 341 p. W. H. Lizars, Edinburgh, London and Dublin. Google Scholar

    32.

    Kitamura, N., Ishii, T., Sangawa, A. and Nakagawa, H., 1986: Geology of the Sendai District . With Geological Sheet Map at 1:50,000 , 134 p. Geological Survey of Japan, Tsukuba. ( in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    33.

    Konda, T. and Ueda, Y., 1980: K–Ar age of the Tertiary volcanic rocks in the Tohoku area, Japan. Journal of Mineralogy, Petrology and Economical Geology , Special Issue , no. 2, p. 343–346. ( in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    34.

    Maruyama, T., 1984: Miocene diatom biostratigraphy of onshore sequences on the Pacific side of northeast Japan, with reference to DSDP Hole 438A (Part 2). Science Reports of the Tohoku University, Second Series (Geology) , vol. 55, p. 77–140. Google Scholar

    35.

    Masuda, K., 1969: Molluscan fauna of the Moniwa Formation, Sendai. Fossils (The Palaeontological Society of Japan) , no. 17, p. 29–40. ( in JapaneseGoogle Scholar

    36.

    Mawatari, S., 1965: Bryozoa. In , Okada, Y., Uchida, S. and Uchida, T. eds., New Illustrated Encyclopedia of the Fauna of Japan , vol. 1, p. 585–628. Hokuryu-Kan, Tokyo. ( in JapaneseGoogle Scholar

    37.

    Nishizawa, Y., 1987: Cheilostomata (Bryozoa) from Sado Island. Publications from the Sado Museum , no. 9, p. 175–196. ( in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    38.

    Nishizawa, Y. and Sakagami, S., 1986: Bryozoa. In , Fuji, N. ed., Paleontological Study of the Nanao Calcareous Sandstone in Noto , p. 78–95. Board of Education, Nanao City, Nanao. ( in JapaneseGoogle Scholar

    39.

    Nomura, S., 1940: Molluscan fauna of the Moniwa Shell Bed exposed along the Natori-gawa in the vicinity of Sendai, Miyagi Prefecture, Japan. Science Reports of the Tohoku University, Second Series (Geology) , vol. 21, p. 1–46. Google Scholar

    40.

    Nomura, S. and Maeda, H., 2008: Significance of autochthonous fossil barnacles from the Miocene Natori Group at the Moniwa-Goishi area, northeast Japan. Paleontological Research , vol. 12, p. 63–79. Google Scholar

    41.

    Oda, M. and Sakai, T., 1977: Microbiostratigraphy of the lower to middle part of the Hatatate Formation, Sendai, Japan. Professor Fujioka Kazuo Memorial Volume , p. 441–456. ( in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    42.

    Okada, H. and Bukry, D., 1980: Supplementary modification and introduction of code numbers to the low-latitude coccolith biostratigraphic zonation (Bukry, 1973, 1975). Marine Micropaleontology , vol. 5, p. 321–325. Google Scholar

    43.

    Okada, Y., 1929: Report of the biological survey of Mutsu Bay. 12. Cheilostomatous Bryozoa of Mutsu Bay. Science Reports of the Tohoku Imperial University, Fourth Series, Biology , vol. 4, p. 11–35. Google Scholar

    44.

    Orbigny, A., d', 1851–1854: Paléontologie Française. Terrains Crétacés. Tome 5. Bryozoaires , 1192 p. Victor Masson, Paris. Google Scholar

    45.

    Ortmann, A., 1890: Die Japanische Bryozoenfauna. Bericht über die von Herrn Dr. L. Döderlein in Jahre 1880–1881 gemachten Sammlungen. Archiv für Naturgeschafte, Jahrg. 54, p. 1–74. Google Scholar

    46.

    Reuss, A. E., 1848: Die fossilen Polyparien des Wiener Tertiärbeckens . Ein monographischer Versuch. Naturwissenschaftlichen Abhandlungen, II, vol. 5, 109 p. Braumüller und Seidel, Wien. Google Scholar

    47.

    Saijo, M., 2010: Fossil fauna from the Sandstone member of the Early Miocene Moniwa Formation at the Kita-Akashi area, southwestern part of Sendai City. Bulletin of Sendai Science Museum , no. 20, p. 43–48. Google Scholar

    48.

    Saito, T., 1963: Miocene planktonic foraminifera from Honshu, Japan. Science Reports of the Tohoku University, Second Series (Geology) , vol. 35, p. 123–209. Google Scholar

    49.

    Sato, Y., 1991: Paleontological study of molluscan assemblages of the Miocene Moniwa Formation, Northeast Japan and description of their Pectinidae. Report of the Geological Survey of Japan , no. 272, p. 1–249, pls. 1–34. Google Scholar

    50.

    Shimamoto, M., Ota, S., Hayashi, H., Sasaki, O. and Saito, T., 2001: Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Miocene Hatatate Formation in the southwestern part of Sendai City, Northeast Japan. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan , vol. 107, p. 258–268. ( in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    51.

    Smitt, F. A., 1868: Kritisk förteckning öfver Skandinaviens Hafs-Bryozoer. III. Öfversigt af Kongliga Vetenskaps-Academiens Förhandlingar , vol. 24, p. 279–429. Google Scholar

    52.

    Stoliczka, F., 1865: Fossile Bryozoen aus dem tertiären Grünsandsteine der Orakei-Bay bei Auckland. Reise der österreichischen Fregatte Novara um die Erde in den Jahren 1857, 1858, 1859 unter den Befehlen des Commodore B. von Wüllerstorf-Urbair , Geologischer Theil , vol. 1, p. 87–158. Google Scholar

    53.

    Suzuki, T., Hayashi, H., Yanagisawa, Y., Fujiwara, O. and Danhara, T., 2019: Integrated chronostratigraphy of the Miocene sedimentary sequence in the northeastern area of Sendai City, Miyagi Prefecture, Northeast Honshu, Japan. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Japan , vol. 70, p. 17–41. ( in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    54.

    Uto, K., Shibata, K. and Uchiumi, S., 1989: K–Ar ages of Neogene volcanic rocks from the Northeast Japan: 1. The Mitaki and the Takadate Formations from Sendai district, Miyagi Prefecture. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan , vol. 95, p. 865–872. ( in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    55.

    Yanagisawa, Y., 1999: Diatom biostratigraphy of the Middle Miocene Hatatate Formation, Sendai City, Miyagi Prefecture, Japan. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Japan , vol. 50, p. 269–277. ( in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    56.

    Zágoršek, K., 2001: Eocene Bryozoa from Hungary. Part II. Systematic Paleontology. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg , vol. 231, p. 19–159. Google Scholar

    57.

    Zágoršek, K., 2010: Bryozoa from the Langhian (Miocene) of Czech Republic. Part II: Systematic description of the Suborder Ascophora Levinsen, 1909 and paleoecological reconstruction of the studied paleoenvironment. Acta Musei Nationalis Pragae, Series B, Historia Naturalis , vol. 66, p. 139–225. Google Scholar

    58.

    Zágoršek, K., Takashima, R. and Hirose, M., 2015: Palaeoenvironment of a monospecific association of a new bryozoan species, Schizoretepora tamagawensis sp. n. (Phidoloporidae, Bryozoa), from the Miocene Tanosawa Formation, Northern Japan. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen , vol. 275, p. 115–123. Google Scholar
    © by the Palaeontological Society of Japan
    Shinji Arakawa "Iodictyum akaishiensis sp. nov.: A New Miocene Phidoloporid (Bryozoa, Cheilostomata) from the Moniwa Formation, Sendai, Japan," Paleontological Research 27(1), 25-33, (1 October 2022). https://doi.org/10.2517/PR200041
    Received: 9 October 2020; Accepted: 8 July 2021; Published: 1 October 2022
    KEYWORDS
    Bryozoa
    Iodictyum
    Langhian
    Northern Japan
    Sendai
    Back to Top