Translator Disclaimer
27 October 2020 Palynological Characteristics of Jasione Species Native to Turkey
Ömür Gençay Çelemli
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Pollen grains of seven Jasione (Campanulaceae) taxa from Turkey were investigated: J. heldreichii Boiss & Orph., J. idaea Stoj., J. montana L., J. supina subsp. supina, J. supina subsp. pontica, J. supina subsp. akmanii, and J. supina subsp. tmolea. Four of the investigated taxa were in the VU (vulnerable) category and one is in the LC (least concern) category (categorized by the International Union for Conservation of Nature). The basic shape of the pollen grains was prolate-spheroidal and oblate-spheroidal; the apertures vary from triporate- to tetra-porate. The sculpturing pattern of exine was microechinate. Two types were recognised according to the pollen shape. Type I is prolate-spheroidal, whereas Type II is oblate-spheroidal. This research will be helpful to explain the relationships among the genera of Campanulaceae and provides insights for future phylogenetic research.

1. Introduction

The Campanulaceae are a nearly cosmopolitan angiosperm family consisting of latex-bearing, primarily perennial herbs or occasional subshrubs that typically have alternate leaves, sympetalous corollas, inferior ovaries, and capsular fruits. Their species diversity is highest in the Northern hemisphere (Perveen and Qaiser 1999). Taxanomic treatments lack consensus. Campanulaceae in the strict sense comprise 600 to 950 species distributed among 35 to 55 genera. Generic circumscription and intrafamilial classification vary widely according to author (Cosner et al. 2004).

Many authors have divided the family into subtribes. For example, De Candolle (1830) divided the family into the subtribes Campanulae (capsule with apical dehiscence) and Wahlenbergeae (capsule with lateral dehiscence), and placed the genus Jasione L. in the subtribe Wahlenbergae. Subsequently, Schönland (1889–1894) divided the family into three subtribes – Campanulinae, Wahlenberginae, and Platycodinae – placing the genus Jasione L. in the subtribe Wahlenberginae.

Various authors have used their own modified system with many nomenclatural changes, and great confusion has resulted. The lack of consensus regarding what constitutes a genus and the failure to apply important character combinations (e.g. cytological and palynological characters) have restrained the reconstruction of the phylogeny of the family Campanulaceae (Eddie et al. 2003). Recent studies employing molecular phylogenetic approaches have made progress in resolving the evolutionary relationships of the family (Mansion et al. 2012; Crowl et al. 2014, 2016; Yoo et al. 2018).

Avetisian (1948, 1967, 1986) was the first researcher to pay attention to the different pollen morphologies within the family. She pointed out that pollen with colpate and colporate apertures are typical of those taxa found in the tropics, whereas those with porate apertures are typical of taxa from temperate regions.

The genus Jasione L. comprises annual, biennial or perennial herbs. Flowers are small, usually shortly pedicellate, in terminal heads surrounded by one or more rows of involucral bracts. The calyx is 5-fid; the corolla is split nearly to its base into five linear-lanceolate lobes. There are five stamens with subulate filaments. The anthers connate at the base. The ovary is 2-locular; the upper part of the style is hairy, with two short, thick stigmas. The fruit is a small, semiglobose capsule, dehiscing by two apical valves. The seeds are ovate, shiny, and brown, and measure 0.6–1 mm (Davis 1978).

The genus Jasione L. is represented by ca. 16 species distributed throughout Europe and the Mediterranean region, from coastal dunes to alpine zones and growing on a wide variety of substrates. The genus shows a high degree of polymorphism, which may be partially caused by its representation across a wide range of ecological niches (Gallego et al. 2015). Jasione montana is the most widespread species in the genus, occurring commonly throughout Europe (Parnell 1987).

Sales et al. (2004) obtained Internal Transcribed Spacers (ITS) sequences from five species of Jasione (J. crispa, J. laevis, J. maritima, J. montana, and J. sessiliflora), including three subspecies of J. montana and two of J. maritima, but found no significant sequence variation among the J. montana and J. maritima samples. They found the maximum divergence within Jasione to be 5.3%, between J. crispa and J. sessiliflora; this is relatively low compared with divergences of ITS sequences calculated for intrageneric analyses in other families. Also, they included only one representative of the Turkish taxa and indicated that to properly analyse the relationships among species and variety, more taxa need to be included in future analyses, particularly from Turkey.

Table 1.

Taxa, voucher specimens and collection data.

img-z2-2_697.gif

Jasione L. has been associated with the Wahlenbergioid taxa because of the apical valvate dehiscence of the capsule according to Alphonse de Candolle's monograph of 1830. Fedorov (1957) treated it as a separate tribe, the Jasioneae Fed., within Schönland's subfamily Campanuloideae, and a similar view was adopted in the provisional classification of Eddie et al. (2003).

Eddie et al. (2003) estimated the phylogeny of Campanulaceae based on ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Their results show a major dichotomy between the colpate/colporate pollen alliance (platycodonoid taxa) and the porate pollen alliance (wahlenbergioid and campanuloid taxa). Within the porate alliance there are two major clades, the wahlenbergioids and the campanuloids. The campanuloid clade is further subdivided into two major clades, representing the Rapunculus and the Campanula s. str. groups, plus three smaller clades that are considered ‘transitional’ taxa. They evaluated the genus Jasione L. in this (transitional) clade and stated the relationship of Jasione to other taxa of Campanulaceae in the ITS tree is unresolved. Jasione has most frequently been associated with the wahlenbergioid alliance; it does bear some resemblance to Feeria Buser with which it shares a similar mode of capsule dehiscence, but it has a chromosome number of 2n = 12 (2n = 34 for Feeria).

On the other hand, Cosner (1993), using rearrangements of the chloroplast genome, showed that Jasione is, on balance, closer to the campanuloids. It forms a clade with Adenophora Fisch., Campanula L., Edraianthus A.D.C., Musschia Dumort., Symphyandra A.D.C., and Trachelium L., but it has the most highly rearranged chloroplast genotype in the family. Also, Sales et al. (2004) indicated that Jasione appears to have more morphological similarity to campanuloids (e.g. coloured pollen and Adenophora-like stigmatic lobes) than to wahlenbergioids, and its Mediterranean distribution is typically campanuloid.

Crowl et al. (2014) presented results based on both chloroplast and low-copy nuclear loci and discussed evolutionary relationships within the Campanuloideae clade. They found Jasione and Wahlenbergia hederacea to be sister taxa.

The comparative pollen morphology of the family was studied by Chapman (1966). Dunbar and Wellentinus (1976) utilised the palynological data of the family Campanulaceae for numerical taxonomy. Dunbar (1975) studied the pollen morphology of Campanulaceae and related families with special reference to ultrastructure. Oybak and Pınar (1995) examined the pollen morphology of some species of the family Campanulaceae from Turkey. The pollen morphology of the family Campanulaceae was also studied by Tarnavschi (1919), Erdtman (1952), Fernandes (1962), Avetisian (1967), Geslot and Medus (1971), Badre et al. (1972), Belem (1976), Inceoglu (1976) and Moore and Webb (1978).

Despite this plethora of phylogenetic investigations, uncertainty about the classification of the Campanulaceae remains. Palynological research can be helpful to explain the systematic relationships between the genera of Campanulaceae. Pollen morphology may be useful in the taxonomic investigation of Jasione at various levels.

Since previous authors have already carried out extensive observations on the pollen morphology of Campanula, Asyneuma, Legousia, Michauxia, Zeugandra, Theodorovia (Khansari et al. 2012), Carania, Cyananthus, Ostrowskia (Erdtman 1952), Echinocodon (Hong 1984), Campanumoea, Cyclocodon, Leptocodon, and Codonopdid (Yuan and Yu 2012), the present study is concerned instead with the pollen morphology of the genus Jasione.

In Turkey, four species and a total of seven Jasione taxa are recognised: J. heldreichii Boiss & Orph., J. idaea Stoj., J. montana L., J. supina subsp. supina, J. supina subsp. pontica, J. supina subsp. akmanii, and J. supina subsp. tmolea (Davis 1978).

Within the family Campanulaceae, the genus Jasione is an ecologically and evolutionary important member. However, detailed data on the pollen morphology of this genus is lacking. Here we present the results of analysis with SPSS statistical software, to evaluate the addition of each morphometric parameter measured on the pollen grains to the classification of the seven native Turkish Jasione taxa listed above. These results will likely be useful for future evolutionary studies of the group.

Additionally, to evaluate the contribution of each morphometric parameter measured on the pollen grains to the ordination of different apricot cultivars, multivariate statistical analysis was performed on standardised data (Chatfield and Collins 1995), using SPSS (Norusis 1988).

2. Material and methods

2.1. Plant materials

Pollen grains of seven taxa of the genus Jasione were investigated. A list of voucher specimens used in this research and the collections data are given in Table 1. The distribution of the seven taxa in Turkey is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The distribution of the genus Jasione in Turkey.

img-z3-6_697.jpg

2.2. Preparation of pollen slides for microscopic analysis

Pollen grains were obtained from mature anthers of fresh flowers. For light microscope (LM) investigation, pollen slides were prepared with glycerin gelatin and basic fuchsine according to the Wodehouse method (Wodehouse 1935).

Table 2.

Pollen morphology of Jasione (values in µm).

img-A-2F_697.gif

2.3. Investigation of the pollen slides

All object slides were labelled with names and voucher numbers. The polar axis, equatorial axis, pore length, pore width, exine thickness, intine thickness, apoporium diameter, and annulus were measured from 30 pollen grains of each specimen under a Nikon Eclipse (E 400) microscope using an immersion objective lens (×100; Table 2).

Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) observations were carried out with an EVO 50 in the Electron Microscopy Laboratory of Hacettepe University.

3. Results

The measurements (all measurements presented are in µm, unless otherwise stated) are as below and the microphotographs are given in Figure 9.

3.1. Jasione heldreichii Boiss. & Orph

Measurements: 19.82 ± 2.09; polar axis: 21.81 ± 2.15; equatorial axis: 21.80 ± 2.1; pore latitude: 3.04 ± 0.61; pore length: 3.93 ± 0.77; annulus: 3.02 ± 0.96; exine: 0.9 ± 0.48; intine: 0.79 ± 0.4; apoporium: 8.66 ± 1.83.

  • Aperture type: triporate

  • Ornamentation: microechinate

  • Pollen shape: oblate-spheroidal

3.2. Jasione idaea Stoj

Measurements: 22.06 ± 2.6; polar axis: 21.89 ± 2.07; equatorial axis: 24.65 ± 1.8; pore latitude: 3.32 ± 0.99; pore length: 3.32 ± 0.82; annulus: 2.81 ± 1.06 exine: 0.66 ± 0.2; intine: 0.43 ± 0.12; apoporium: 7.95 ± 2.5.

  • Aperture type: triporate

  • Ornamentation: microechinate

  • Pollen shape: prolate-spheroidal

3.3. Jasione Montana L

Measurements: 20.49 ± 2.46; polar axis: 22.75 ± 2.04; equatorial axis: 21.58 ± 2.57; pore latitude: 3.24 ± 1.01; pore length: 3.48 ± 0.89; annulus: 2.74 ± 0.91; exine: 0.74 ± 0.22; intine: 0.69 ± 0.27; apoporium: 11.02 ± 2.44.

  • Aperture type: triporate

  • Ornamentation: microechinate

  • Pollen shape: prolate-spheroidal

3.4. Jasione supina Sieber ssp. akmanii

Measurements: 22.42 ± 2.62; polar axis: 25.79 ± 2.19; equatorial axis: 25.51 ± 1.77; pore latitude: 4.12 ± 0.67; pore length: 3.48 ± 0.89; annulus: 2.5 ± 0.63; exine: 0.99 ± 0.003; intine: 0.73 ± 0.25; apoporium: 13.1 ± 2.85.

  • Aperture type: triporate

  • Ornamentation: microechinate

  • Pollen shape: prolate-spheroidal

Figure 2.

Pollen size variations of seven taxa.

img-z5-1_697.jpg

Figure 3.

Equatorial axis measurements of investigated pollen.

img-z5-3_697.jpg

3.5. Jasiona supina Sieber ssp. pontica (Boiss.) Damboldt

Measurements: 23.3 ± 2.29; polar axis: 26.2 ± 1.19; equatorial axis: 25.86 ± 2.2; pore latitude: 4.34 ± 0.77; pore length: 4.011 ± 0.8; annulus: 2.83 ± 0.9; exine: 1.04 ± 0.39; intine: 0.77 ± 0.25; apoporium: 13 ± 3.61.

  • Aperture type: triporate and tetraporate

  • Ornamentation: microechinate

  • Pollen shape: prolate-spheroidal

3.6. Jasione supina Sieber ssp. supina

Measurements: 25 ± 3.07; polar axis: 26.16 ± 2.05; equatorial axis: 25.63 ± 2.3; pore latitude: 4 ± 0.87; pore length: 3.9 ± 0.95; annulus: 2.71 ± 0.87; exine: 0.98 ± 0.09; intine: 0.73 ± 0.27; apoporium: 3.56 ± 2.3.

  • Aperture type: triporate and tertraporate

  • Ornamentation: microechinate

  • Pollen shape: prolate-spheroidal

Figure 4.

Polar axis measurements of investigated pollen.

img-z6-1_697.jpg

Figure 5.

Exine measurements of investigated pollen.

img-z6-3_697.jpg

3.7. Jasione supina Sieber ssp. tmolea (Stoj) Damboldt

Measurements: 21.84 ± 3.38; polar axis: 24.045 ± 2.49; equatorial axis: 24.32 ± 2.05; pore latitude: 3.52 ± 0.67; pore length: 2.88 ± 0.96; annulus: 3.047 ± 0.94; exine: 0.64 ± 0.25; intine: 0.46 ± 0.15; apoporium: 11.96 ± 3.1.

  • Aperture type: triporate and tetraporate

  • Ornamentation: microechinate

  • Pollen shape: oblate-spheroidal

  • The mean sizes of the seven taxa varied between 19.82 and 25 µm (Figure 2). Equatorial axis values are very similar among the taxa, except J. montana and J. heldreichii (Figure 3). Polar axis values are very similar among the taxa, except J. montana and J. heldreichii (Figure 4). Mean exine values were lower in J. idaeae and J. supina subsp. tmolea compared to the other taxa (Figure 5). Jasione supina subsp. tmeloa and J. idaea were more similar to each other than to the others in terms of intine thickness (Figure 6). Measurements showed that J. heldreichii and J. idaea have lower apoporium values (Figure 7). As shown in Figure 8, J4 (Jasione supina subsp. tmolea) and J6 (Jasione heldreichii) have the same pollen shape and are classified as Type II. To observe the ornamentation of the pollen grains, SEM photographs were taken and are shown in Figure 10.

Figure 6.

Intine measurements of investigated pollen.

img-z7-1_697.jpg

Figure 7.

Apoporium measurements of investigated pollen.

img-z7-3_697.jpg

Figure 8.

P/E ratios of the investigated seven taxa.

img-z7-5_697.jpg

Figure 9.

Microphotographs of the pollen (a) Jasione heldreichii Boiss. & Orph; (b) Jasione idaea Stoj.; (c) Jasione montana L.; (d) Jasione supina Sieber ssp. akmanii; (e) Jasiona supina Sieber ssp. pontica (Boiss.) Damboldt; (f) Jasione supina Sieber ssp. supina; (g) Jasione supina Sieber ssp. tmolea (Stoj) Damboldt.

img-z8-1_697.jpg

Continued

img-z9-1_697.jpg

4. Discussion

Previous palynological investigations of the Campanulaceae family are limited. Past researchers mentioned the stenopalynous feature of pollen grains in Campanula and its relatives (Erkara et al. 1970; Perveen and Qaiser 1999; Khansari et al. 2012). The current research suggests Jasione individuals collected from Turkey have porate apertures, as is common for taxa from temperate regions (Avetisian 1948).

Khansari et al. (2012) investigated the pollen morphology of 35 taxa of Campanula, five species of Asyneuma, and one species each of the genera Legousia, Michauxia, Zeugandra, and Theodorovia. They found the type of aperture in all examined taxa was porate but the number of pores was variable, with the majority possessing 3–4 pores. They also mentioned the diameter of the pores was 3–7 µm, and that the pores were located equatorially and have an operculum in all investigated species. They measured the thickness of exine as 1–1.92 µm. According to their results the surface of the exine is rugulate or rugulate-microreticulate; the size of the longest echini on pollen surface ranges from 0.10 µm to 2.21 µm. Similar to the present study, the apertures of the investigated Jasione taxa were found to be porate (3–4) and the diameter of the pores was 3.04–4.34 µm.

Yuan and Yu (2012) observed the pollen of Platycodon to be 5–6-colporate with medium–large spinules (1.5 µm) and called it the Platcodon type; the genus Ostrowskia was 6–7 colpate with large verrucose sexine and was called the Ostrowskia type; Echinocodon D.Y.Hong was 4–5 colpate with short colpi and basally divided sexine spinules and was classified as Echinocodon type. As a result they recognised and name nine pollen types and two subtypes in the platycodonoid group.

Figure 10.

SEM micrographs of the pollen (a) Jasione heldreichii Boiss. & Orph; (b) Jasione idaea Stoj.; (c) Jasione montana L.; (d) Jasione supina Sieber ssp. akmanii; (e) Jasiona supina Sieber ssp. pontica (Boiss.) Damboldt; (f) Jasione supina Sieber ssp. supina; (g) Jasione supina Sieber ssp. tmolea (Stoj) Damboldt.

img-z10-1_697.jpg

Continued

img-z11-1_697.jpg

Perveen and Qaiser (1999) investigated the pollen morphology of 10 species belonging to the three genera of the family Campanulaceae under light and scanning electron microscopy. On the basis of the aperture, two distinct pollen types are recognised – viz. the Campanula latifolia type (Asyneuma thomsonii, Campanula leucociada, C. aristata, C. latifolia, C. tenuissima, C. argyrotricha, C. cashmeriana, C. pallida) with three pores (rarely 4–7), tectum finely striate-rugulate, or rarely finely punctate with spinules; and the Codonopsis clematidea type (Codonopsis clematidea, C.obtusa) with 6–10 colpate pollen grains, and tectum finely reticulate to striate-rugulate with spinules. The Jasione taxa from Turkey investigated in the present study are similar to the Campanula latifolia aperture type.

Erkara et al. (1970) investigted the pollen morphology of 12 Turkish species of Campanula (C. argaea, C. cymbalaria, C. glomerata subsp. hispida, C. latiloba subsp. latiloba, C. lyrata subsp. lyrata, C. olympica, C. persicifolia, C. pterocaula, C. rapunculoides subsp. cordifolia, C. rapunculus var. rapunculus, C. stricta var. stricta, and C. pamphylica subsp. tokurii) under light and scanning electron microscopy. They observed the 12 taxa are more or less oblate-spheroidal, triporate (and/or tetraporate), tectum-scabrate, or with circular amb. The aperture types of the Jasione taxa investigated here showed similarities to Erkara et al.'s results.

5. Conclusion

In all the investigated taxa, the aperture type was determined to be porate and the ornamentation microechinate. The annulus was observed distinctly in all samples. No previous reports are available that deal with the pollen morphology of the genus Jasione from Turkey. This research, therefore, is the first detailed study of the palynological characteristics of Jasione taxa native to Turkey. The results will be helpful for future taxonomic research on Campanulaceae.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

References

1.

Avetisian E. 1948. Palynologica caucasica III. Pollen of the Caucasian representatives of the family Campanulaceae. Trudy Bot. Inst. Akad. Nauk Armjansk. SSR. 5: 199–206. [In Russian]. Google Scholar

2.

Avetisian E. 1967. Morphology of the pollen of the family Campanulaceae and closely related families (Sphenocleaceae, Lobeliaceae, Cyphiaceae) in connection with questions of their systematic and phylogeny. Trudy Bot. Inst. Acad. Sci. Armenia 16: 5–41. [In Russian.] Google Scholar

3.

Avetisian E. 1986. Palynomorphology of the families Campanulaceae, Sphenocleaceae, and Pentaphragmataceae. Bot. Zhurn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 71: 1003–1010. [In Russian.] Google Scholar

4.

Badre F, Cadet TH, Malplanche M. 1972. Etude systematique et palynologique du genre Heterachaenia (Campanulaceae) endemique des Mascareignes. Adansonia. 12:267–278. Google Scholar

5.

Belem C. 1976. Descricåø palinologica de especies de Campanulaceae dos generos Centropogon e Siphocamplus. Revista Brasileira de Biologia. 36:861–870. Google Scholar

6.

Candolle AP. 1830. Monographie des Campanulees. Paris: V. Desray. Google Scholar

7.

Chatfield C, Collins AJ. 1995. Introduction to Multivariate Analysis: Text in Statistical Science. Chapman and Hall, England. Google Scholar

8.

Chapman JL. 1966. Comparative palynology in Campanulaceae. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science (1903-). 69(3/4):197–200. Google Scholar

9.

Cosner ME. 1993. Phylogenetic and Molecular Evolutionary Studies of Chloroplast DNA Variation in the Campanulaceae. Ph.D. Dissertation, Ohio State University. Google Scholar

10.

Cosner ME, Raubeson LA, Jansen RK. 2004. Chloroplast DNA rearrangements in Campanulaceae: phylogenetic utility of highly rearranged genomes. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 4(1):27. Google Scholar

11.

Crowl AA, Mavrodiev E, Mansion G, Haberle R, Pistarino A, Kamari G, Phitos D, Borsch T, Cellinese N. 2014. Phylogeny of Campanuloideae (Campanulaceae) with emphasis on the utility of nuclear pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) genes. PLoS One. 9(4):e94199. Google Scholar

12.

Crowl AA, Miles NW, Visger CJ, Hansen K, Ayers T, Haberle R, Cellinese N. 2016. A global perspective on Campanulaceae: biogeographic, genomic, and floral evolution. American Journal of Botany. 103(2):233–245. Google Scholar

13.

Davis PH. 1978. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vol. 6. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press. Google Scholar

14.

Dunbar A. 1975. On pollen of Campanulaceae and related families with special reference to surface ultrastructure. I & II. Botaniska Notiser. 128:73–118. Google Scholar

15.

Dunbar A, Wallentinus HG. 1976. On pollen of Campanulaceae III. A numerical taxonomic investigation. Botaniska Notiser. 129:69–72. Google Scholar

16.

Eddie WM, Shulkina T, Gaskin J, Haberle RC, Jansen RK. 2003. Phylogeny of Campanulaceae S.Str. Inferred from its sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 90(4):554–575. Google Scholar

17.

Erdtman G. 1952. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. Geologiska Föreningen i Stockholm Förhandlingar. 74(4):526–527. Google Scholar

18.

Erkara PI, Ocak A, Pehlivan S. 1970. Pollen morphology of some Turkish Campanula spp. and their taxonomic value. Bangladesh Journal of Botany. 37(1):33–42. Google Scholar

19.

Fedorov A. 1957. Campanula L. In: Komarov K, editor. Flora of the USSR, Vol. 24. Moscow and Leningrad, USSR: Académie des Sciences de l'URSS, pp. 126–501. Google Scholar

20.

Fernandes A. 1962. Sobre a Cariologia de Campanula lusitanica L. ex. Loefl. e C. transtagana R. Fernandes. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana. 36:129–142. Google Scholar

21.

Gallego PPF, Romo AM, Roselló R, Laguna E, Peris B. 2015. A revised typification of Jasione corymbosa and J. glabra (Campanulaceae) from the Western Mediterranean area. Phytotaxa. 233(1):94–97. Google Scholar

22.

Geslot A, Medus J. 1971. Morphologie pollinique et nombre chromosomique dans la sous section Heterophylla du genre Campanula. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology. 13(4):888–894. Google Scholar

23.

Hong DY. 1984. Echinocodon Hong, a new genus of Campanulaceae and its systematic position. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica. 22(3):118–181. Google Scholar

24.

Inceoglu O. 1976. A study of some pollen grains of Companulaceae by scanning electron microscopy. Communications. 20(C2): 31–39. Google Scholar

25.

Khansari E, Zarre S, Alizadeh K, Attar F, Aghabeigi F, Salmaki Y. 2012. Pollen morphology of Campanula (Campanulaceae) and allied genera in Iran with special focus on its systematic implication. Flora. 207(3): 203–211. Google Scholar

26.

Mansion G, Parolly G, Crowl AA, Mavrodiev E, Cellinese N, Oganesian M, Fraunhofer K, Kamari G, Phitos D, Haberle R, et al. 2012. How to handle speciose clades? Massive taxon-sampling as a strategy towards illuminating the natural history of the bell flowers (Campanula, Campanuloideae). PLoS One. 7(11):e50076. Google Scholar

27.

Moore PD, Webb JA. 1978. An illlustrated guide to pollen analysis. London: Hodder and Stoughton. Google Scholar

28.

Norusis JM. 1988. SPSS/PC + Advanced Statistics V2.0 for the IBM PC/XT/ AT and PC/2.SPSS Inc. Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. Google Scholar

29.

Oybak E, Pınar M. 1995. Pollen morphology of some Turkish Campanula L. species. Turkish Journal of Botany. 19:577–580. Google Scholar

30.

Parnell J. 1987. Variation in Jasione montana L. (Campanulaceae) and related species in Europe and North Africa. Watsonia. 16:249–267. Google Scholar

31.

Perveen A, Qaiser M. 1999. Pollen flora of Pakistan-XIII. Campanulaceae. Turkish Journal of Botany. 23:45–51. Google Scholar

32.

Sales F, Hedge IC, Eddie W, Preston J, Moeller M. 2004. Jasione L. taxonomy and phylogeny. Turkish Journal of Botany. 28:253–259. Google Scholar

33.

Schönland S. 1889–1894. Campanulaceae. In: Engler, A, Prantl, K, editors, Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien IV. Vol. 5. Leipzig: W. Engelmann; p. 40–70. Google Scholar

34.

Tarnavschi IT. 1919. Study on the pollen morphology of the Campanulaceae belonging to the Romanian flora. Review of Biology 4(1):5–17. Google Scholar

35.

Wodehouse RP. 1935. Pollen grains. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar

36.

Yoo K-O, Crowl AA, Kim K-A, Cheon K-S, Cellinese N. 2018. Origins of East Asian Campanuloideae (Campanulaceae) diversity. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 127:468–474. Google Scholar

37.

Yuan HD, Yu PK. 2012. Pollen morphology of the platycodonoid group (Campanulaceae s.str.) and its systematic implications. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 54(10):773–789. Google Scholar
© 2019 AASP – The Palynological Society
Ömür Gençay Çelemli "Palynological Characteristics of Jasione Species Native to Turkey," Palynology 44(4), 697-708, (27 October 2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/01916122.2019.1691671
Published: 27 October 2020
JOURNAL ARTICLE
12 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top