BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
How to translate text using browser tools
17 November 2021 Psychophysiology, cognition, and political differences
Guest editors' introduction to the special issue
Jordan Mansell, Allison Harell, Elisabeth Gidengil, Patrick A. Stewart
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We introduce the Politics and the Life Sciences special issue on Psychophysiology, Cognition, and Political Differences. This issue represents the second special issue funded by the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences that adheres to the Open Science Framework for registered reports (RR). Here pre-analysis plans (PAPs) are peer-reviewed and given in-principle acceptance (IPA) prior to data being collected and/or analyzed, and are published contingent upon the preregistration of the study being followed as proposed. Bound by a common theme of the importance of incorporating psychophysiological perspectives into the study of politics, broadly defined, the articles in this special issue feature a unique set of research questions and methodologies. In the following, we summarize the findings, discuss the innovations produced by this research, and highlight the importance of open science for the future of political science research.

Jordan Mansell, Allison Harell, Elisabeth Gidengil, and Patrick A. Stewart "Psychophysiology, cognition, and political differences
Guest editors' introduction to the special issue," Politics and the Life Sciences 40(2), 137-141, (17 November 2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2021.21
Published: 17 November 2021
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
cognition
in-principle acceptance (IPA)
open science
political differences
pre-analysis plan (PAP)
preregistration
psychophysiology
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top