The cognitive deterioration of politicians is a critical emerging issue. As professions including law and medicine develop and implement cognitive assessments, their insights may inform the proper strategy within politics. The aging, lifetime-appointed judiciary raises legal and administrative questions of such assessments, while testing of older physicians experiencing cognitive decline provides real-life examples of implementation. In politics, cognitive assessment must contend with the field's unique challenges, also taking context-dependent interpretations of cognitive-neuropsychological status into account. These perspectives, from legal and medical experts, political scientists, and officeholders, can contribute toward an equitable, functioning, and non-discriminatory system of assessing cognition that educates the public and enables politicians to maintain their public responsibilities. With proper implementation and sufficient public knowledge, we believe cognitive assessments for politicians, particularly political candidates, can be valuable for maintaining properly functioning governance. We offer recommendations on the development, implementation, and execution of such assessments, grappling with their democratic and legal implications.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 November 2024
Cognitive decline and political leadership
Steven Gong,
Zifeng P. Hu,
S. Nassir Ghaemi,
Dave Min,
Mark Mapstone,
S. S. Sanbar,
Manijeh Berenji,
Shawn Rosenberg,
Davin Phoenix,
Mark Fisher
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
It is not available for individual sale.
This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
It is not available for individual sale.
Politics and the Life Sciences
Vol. 43 • No. 2
Spring 2024
Vol. 43 • No. 2
Spring 2024
brain aging
cognitive test
mental exam
neuropolitics
neuropsychological evaluation
neuroscience
politicians