Translator Disclaimer
1 May 2006 On a New Species of Titi Monkey, Genus Callicebus Thomas (Primates, Pitheciidae), from Western Bolivia with Preliminary Notes on Distribution and Abundance
Robert B. Wallace, Humberto Gómez, Annika Felton, Adam M. Felton
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This paper describes a new species of titi monkey, Callicebus aureipalatii, recently discovered in the Madidi protected area of northwestern Bolivia. Descriptions are based on observations, photographs and video material, and the subsequent collection of two specimens. Preliminary surveys and notes on habitat associations indicate that C. aureipalatii is limited in distribution to the western side of the Río Beni. It is found in the Andean foothills and immediately adjacent lowland forests. Line transect studies at four sites and subsequent extrapolations based on available suitable habitat suggest that population densities are sufficiently high to ensure the protection of this species within the confines of the Madidi protected area. This finding is discussed with reference to the general lack of knowledge regarding titi monkey distributions in Bolivia.

Introduction

Neotropical primate taxonomy is constantly changing, with the regular discovery of new taxa (Ayres 1985; Ferrari and Lopes 1992; Mittermeier et al. 1992; Silva and Noronha 1998; Van Roosmalen et al. 1998; Ferrari et al. 1999; Kobayashi and Langguth 1999; Van Roosmalen et al. 2000, 2002). The use of morphological, genetic, and molecular data is also revealing important differences between populations previously thought homogenous; for example, Alouatta sara (Stanyon et al. 1995). The most recent review of the Platyrrhini (Rylands et al. 2000) argued that for conservation purposes it is preferable to adopt a “splitting” approach to formal taxonomy to ensure that all possible taxa are accounted for in associated action plans. This approach has been particularly relevant to the smaller and extremely diverse neotropical taxa such as the Amazonian marmosets (Mico, formally Callithrix), the ranges of which are often delineated by the larger Amazonian tributaries (Van Roosmalen et al. 1998, 2000).

A recent taxonomic review of the titi monkeys (Callicebus) resulted in a list of 28 species (Van Roosmalen et al. 2002). It drew on previous efforts over the last 15 years (Hershkovitz 1988, 1990; Kobayashi and Langguth 1999; Groves 2001), introduced two new taxa, and argued that river barriers (Ayres and Clutton-Brock 1992) are a major cause of speciation for this genus. Titi monkeys are small primates (c.1 kg), are unable to swim, and apparently visit flooded forests only during high waters (Van Roosmalen et al. 2002).

Until recently the northern part of the La Paz Department, Bolivia, was relatively unexplored with very little biological information available for the region. Current information, nevertheless, suggests that Madidi is the most biologically diverse terrestrial protected area in the world (Remsen and Parker 1995; CARE/WCS/IE/SERNAP 2003). For example, over 900 bird species have already been registered within the park despite large areas never having been visited by biologists (CARE/WCS/IE/SERNAP 2003). Furthermore, in recent years western Bolivia has provided a series of range extensions for rare or threatened species (Gottdenker et al. 2001; Tarifa et al. 2001; Hennessey 2002a), new Bolivian records (Hennessey and Gómez 2003; Rios et al. 2004), as well as vertebrate species potentially new to science (Wallace and Painter 1999; Hennessey 2002b). In this paper we describe a new species of titi monkey found in the Madidi protected area and surrounding lowlands in northwestern Bolivia, and provide preliminary information regarding its distribution and ecology.

Methods

Species description

In August and September 2002 we filmed and photographed five groups of an unidentified Callicebus in the Tuichi Valley. This material provided sufficient evidence to justify the collection of a type specimen in February 2003. A description was then made using two specimens collected along the Río Hondo within the Natural Area of Integrated Management section of the Madidi protected area in northern La Paz Department, Bolivia, as well as video and photographic footage from groups in the Tuichi and Hondo valleys and the Alto Madidi site farther north (Fig. 1). The specimens were deposited in the Colección Boliviana de Fauna, part of the Museo Nacional de Historia Natural based in La Paz, Bolivia.

Figure 1.

Known and hypothetical C. aureipalatii distribution in northern La Paz Department, Bolivia.

i0898-6207-20-1-29-f01.gif

Distribution

Distributional information on the titi monkey was gathered from observations collected during general mammalian biodiversity surveys conducted in the northern La Paz region between 1999 and 2004. Six sites were surveyed (Fig. 1); Río Hondo (14°37′30″S, 67°43′06″W), Río Tuichi (14°33′10″S, 67°43′19″W), Río Quendeque (14°59′14″S, 67°46′59″W) Río Undumo (13°44′22″S, 68°21′42″W), the Asariamas region (14°12′38″S, 68°30′05″W), and Alto Madidi region (13°37′18″ S, 68°44′33″W).

We also conducted a literature search for the region to identify possible locations for the species, as well as directed searches for Callicebus at six sites (Fig. 1): the eastern and western sides of the Río Beni at Cachichira and Carmen del Emero, and Asunción del Quiquibey and Sani in the Pilón Lajas Biosphere Reserve and Indigenous Territory on the western side of the Río Beni.

Density and habitat preferences

Line transect methodologies were employed to survey the Río Undumo, Asariamas, Río Tuichi, Río Quendeque, Alto Madidi, and Río Hondo sites (Gómez et al. 2001, 2003; Ríos et al. 2001). Diurnal transects were typically run by two observers in fair weather conditions between 06:00 and 11:30 and from 15:00 to 18:00, along trails newly cut by the survey team. Transect speed ranged from 1–2 km per hour and depended on trail conditions and associated noise levels. Periods of walking were regularly interspersed with brief “listening stops” to increase the probability of detecting more cryptic species. The following information was recorded for all primates encountered: species, group size (and where possible age/sex composition), date and time detected, observation duration, transect position, habitat type, and the perpendicular distance from the transect trail to the estimated geometric center of the group. Trail and transect effort are detailed in Table 1. Results were analyzed using DISTANCE techniques and accompanying software (Thomas et al. 2001).

Table 1.

Sampling effort and relative abundance of C. aureipalatii at four sites in western Bolivia.

i0898-6207-20-1-29-t01.gif

Callicebus aureipalatii sp. nov.

Holotype: Adult male, skin, skull and complete skeleton (CBF7511, Collectors: Robert Wallace, Rodolfo Nallar, Jesús Martínez, Fortunato Espinoza, Lucio Ocampo and Remberto Chiguapuri, 2003). Colección Boliviana de Fauna, Museo Nacional de Historial Natural, La Paz, Bolivia. Collected 27 February 2003 on the northern bank of the Río Hondo (14°37′59″W, 67°42′27″S).

Paratype: Adult female, skin, skull and complete skeleton (CBF7510, Collectors: Robert Wallace, Rodolfo Nallar, Jesús Martínez, Fortunato Espinoza, Lucio Ocampo and Remberto Chiguapuri, 2003). Colección Boliviana de Fauna, Museo Nacional de Historial Natural, La Paz, Bolivia. Collected 25 February 2003 on the southern bank of the Río Hondo (14°38′23″W, 67°42′27″S).

Type locality: Campamento Roco Roco, Río Hondo, Madidi National Park and Natural Area of Integrated Management, La Paz Department, Bolivia (14°37′30″S, 67°43′06″W).

Diagnosis: A species of the C. moloch group (sensu Hershkovitz 1990; Groves 2001) as defined according to broad distributional and physical characteristics. Using the Van Roosmalen et al. (2002) classification, this new species shows physical similarities with the C. cupreus group (crown and cheiridia dominated by pheomelanin hair pigments, orange ventrally sharply contrasting with agouti body coloration, cheiridia reddish), however, available information on distribution suggests it borders C. brunneus (a member of the C. moloch group according to Van Roosmalen et al. 2002) to the north. This species is distinguished by a golden crown due to golden tipped hairs with dark longer base, dark forehead with slightly less golden coloration; deep orange throat and ventral area; deep orange burgundy limbs from elbow and knees to hands and feet; dark tail with clear paler whitish tip (Figs. 2–6). Distinguished from C. brunneus by a distinct golden coloration on the crown, deep orange throat coloration; sharply contrasting sideburns and underside, and orange to burgundy cheiridia; from C. cupreus by a distinct golden coloration on the crown and deep orange throat coloration, and from C. dubius by a distinct golden coloration on the crown, deep orange throat coloration, and lack of the white forehead stripe. C. olallae, C. modestus, and C. donacophilus, all members of the C. donacophilus species group (Van Roosmalen et al. 2002) and found exclusively on the eastern side of the Río Beni, display clear white ear tufts and are characterized by a uniform dorsal and lateral body color. These taxa lack differential crown coloration and contrasting lateral coloration on the limbs, and are characterized by a uniformly colored tail with no obvious white tip.

Figure 2.

The Madidi titi monkey, Callicebus aureipalatii sp. nov. Illustration by Annika Felton.

i0898-6207-20-1-29-f02.jpg

Figure 3.

C. aureipalatii, new species. Views of the male holotype (CBF7511). Photographs by R. B. Wallace.

i0898-6207-20-1-29-f03.jpg

Figure 4.

C. aureipalatii, new species. Views of the male holotype (CBF7511). Photographs by R. B. Wallace.

i0898-6207-20-1-29-f04.jpg

Figure 5.

Details of the adult male holotype C. aureipalatii (CBF7511): a. tail and hind feet, b. hind legs, c. hind foot. Photographs by R. B. Wallace.

i0898-6207-20-1-29-f05.jpg

Figure 6.

Dorsal views of the adult male holotype of C. aureipalatii (CBF7511). Photographs by H. Gómez.

i0898-6207-20-1-29-f06.jpg

External characteristics of holotype: Dorsal and lateral body to neck, lateral forelimbs to elbow and lateral hind-limbs to knee light brown non-uniform color due to agouti-banded hairs that are grey brown at the basal half, then changing to banded grey brown with lighter brown, and ending in a light brown tip. Laterally, forelimbs and hind limbs from elbows and knees colors gradually change to deep orange burgundy through initial mixing of orange hairs. At hands color change becomes more definite to a deep burgundy and these hairs lightly cover hands dorsally. Feet very thickly covered with dark burgundy colored hair. Body ventrally pale orange largely due to low hair density. Hair density increases from groin area toward abdominal and chest regions, considerably denser at neck. Ventral hairs are a deep orange color that deepens as hair density increases and extends to cheek regions as far as the base of the ear. Forelimbs and hind limbs ventrally the same orange color as far as the feet where the color deepens slightly in the hands and more strikingly in the feet. Tail brown to black dorsally, paler black to light brown ventrally with banded hairs (pale base and dark tip). Tip of tail clearly whitish pale with white hairs at very tip (female specimen hairs c.52 mm long and male specimen c.81 mm). Crown extending to an area just above ears shows clearly defined golden tipped c.16 mm hairs that are banded in dark and light brown phases at the base with a c.4.5 mm golden tip. Forehead appears slightly darker due to shorter hairs (c.9.5 mm) with smaller golden portions. No clear line distinguishing crown area. Facial skin black with a few whitish hairs in the nasal region; whiskers and eyebrows black; paler ears with hairs on tops of ears golden tipped and hair around ear orange; pupils black and irises coffee colored. During transect observations, filming and collection activities in more than 15 different social groups only one animal showed variation to the holotype description above, being slightly paler.

Figure 7.

Skull of the adult male holotype of C. aureipalatii (CBF7511), and mandibles of the male holotype and female paratype (CBF7510). Note variation in the coronoidal forms of male (right) and female (left) mandibles. Photographs by R. B. Wallace and H. Gómez.

i0898-6207-20-1-29-f07.jpg

Measurements: See Tables 2 and 3.

Table 2.

Measurements (in mm) of specimens of C. aureipalatii.

i0898-6207-20-1-29-t02.gif

Table 3.

Cranial and dental measurements (mm) of two specimens of C. aureipalatii following Kobayashi (1995).

i0898-6207-20-1-29-t03.gif

Etymology: This species is named Callicebus aureipalatii in recognition of a major financial contribution from Golden- Palace.com to FUNDESNAP (Foundation for the Development of the National Protected Area System). This funding will go exclusively toward the long-term conservation of the Madidi National Park and Natural Integrated Management Area where the species was discovered.

Vernacular Name: This species is locally known by the generic names for titi monkeys in the region — luca luca or lucachi. The company  http://GoldenPalace.com refers to the monkey as the  http://GoldenPalace.com monkey, and other English names currently in use include the golden palace monkey and the Madidi titi monkey.

Geographic Distribution: Callicebus aureipalatii was present at four of the line transect survey sites: Río Tuichi, Río Hondo, Alto Madidi, and Río Undumo (see Fig. 1). The literature review revealed a further 15 sites in the immediate vicinity of the known distribution where an unidentified Callicebus had been registered: Chalalán, Tumupasa, Capaina, Buena Vista, Santa Fe, Carmen Pecha, Bella Altura, Napashi, Santa Rosa de Maravilla, Altamarani, San Antonio de Tequeje, Carmen del Emero, Esperanza de Enapurera, Tres Hermanos, and Cachichira (Sarmiento et al. 2001; CIPTA/WCS, unpubl. data). According to our surveys, Callicebus aureipalatii is found exclusively on the western side of the Río Beni, a major tributary of the Amazon and one of the largest rivers in Bolivia. The known and hypothetical distribution of this species is shown in Figure 1. In addition, literature and structured informal interviews with local indigenous communities along the Río Quiquibey suggest that the genus Callicebus is now absent from most of the Pilon Lajas Biosphere Reserve and Indigenous Territory (Barrera et al. 1994; Rumiz and Townsend 1999) apparently wiped out because of its use as fishing bait (Ascensión de Quiquibey, pers. comm.). Nevertheless, a group of unidentified Callicebus monkeys were heard calling in the Sani vicinity (14°35′41″W, 67°29′47″S) of Pilon Lajas in March 2003 (F. Espinoza, pers. comm.).

Habitat: The Río Tuichi and Río Hondo valleys are adjacent tributaries of the Río Beni and are enclosed by the last foothills of the Andes in northwestern Bolivia. The region is characterized by a marked dry season between April and November with annual precipitation of approximately 2,230 mm. Vegetation appears similar to that of the Beni alluvial plain forests found at the base of the Andes in this region. The forest is characterized by relatively open canopies with a large proportion of palms such as Iriartea deltoidea, Scheelea princeps, Astrocaryum sp., Socratea exhorriza, and Jessenia, as well as large emergent and canopy tree species such as Ceiba pentandra, Sterculia sp., Cabralea canjerana, Rinorea viridifolia, Pseudolmedia sp., and Pentaplaris davidsmithii (Flores et al. 2002; pers. obs.). Callicebus aureipalatii has been observed in the lowland plain forests of the Río Tuichi and Río Hondo valleys and the Alto Madidi lowlands, as well as the piedmont or foothill forests of the region in the Río Tuichi, Río Hondo, Alto Madidi, and Río Undumo study sites. Sightings to date are altitudinally distributed between 200 and 500 m a.s.l., although surveys are lacking in the humid tropical forests between 500 and 1,000 m a.s.l. that might be suitable habitat for Callicebus. Based on distributional and habitat use data we used a simple GIS model using habitat type, potential river boundaries, and elevation to provide a preliminary estimation of potential habitat for C. aureipalatii (Fig. 1). A total of 4,256 km2 were estimated to be suitable using this model.

Relative abundance and density: Relative abundance data for the four sample sites are presented in Table 1. In general, there is a little variation across the transect survey sites where titi monkeys were recorded. It is worth mentioning that an examination of the data suggests a fairly localized distribution across wide areas at these survey sites. Overall mean and modal group size was three (mean: SE 0.19). Distance sampling analysis of 902 km of line transect data from the Río Hondo, Río Tuichi, Alto Madidi, and Río Undumo study sites revealed an overall density of 6.2 animals/km2 (Hazard Rate Model; n = 33 transect sightings; 95% Confidence Limits: 2.7–14.2 animals/km2). These results combined with the habitat availability model provide a crude population estimate of around 26,400 animals (95% Confidence Limits: 11,491–60,435 animals).

Discussion

The recent and comprehensive taxonomic review of the genus (Van Roosmalen et al. 2002) recognized 28 species. Hershkovitz (1988, 1990) emphasized that “primary differentiation among species and subspecies of Callicebus is in coat color,” and we suggest that the differences detailed herein for C. aureipalatii are sufficiently distinct from neighboring congeners (C. brunneus, C. dubius, C. cupreus, C. donacophilus, C. modestus and C. ollalae) that species status should be afforded.

This species represents the first new primate discovery for Bolivia in the last 60 years (Anderson, 1997). The populations described in this study were assumed to be of C. brunneus (Hershkovitz 1988; Emmons and Feer 1999) or C. olallae (Van Roosmalen et al. 2002). Van Roosmalen et al. (2002) made an error in the maps for the hypothesized populations of C. olallae and C. modestus that were depicted as occurring exclusively on the western side of the Río Beni. Both these species were actually collected on the eastern side of the Río Beni within 52 km of each other (Anderson 1997; see Figure 633, pp. 316; Hershkovitz 1990, see Figure 23, pp. 47; Felton et al. 2006) in the vicinity of the town of Santa Rosa in the Ballivian province.

Indeed, surveys conducted in 2002 by the research team confirmed the presence of titi monkeys fitting the description of both of these taxa in the Santa Rosa region (Felton et al. 2006) and, although the precise distributional situation of these taxa has yet to be resolved, available information strongly suggests that they are confined to the eastern bank of the Río Beni (Martinez and Wallace unpubl. data). This study, therefore, further suggests the importance of rivers as distributional boundaries for the genus Callicebus and highlights the need for future surveys to focus on both sides of a given river. In this light, further investigation as to the identity of the Sani population, as well as structured informal interviews along the Palos Blancos–Yucumo–Rurrenabaque road would be critical in confirming the apparent absence of Callicebus aureipalatii on the eastern side of the Río Beni.

Data from southern Peru are scarce and surveys on both sides of the Río Heath are a priority in order to determine the western limit of this species' range. The northern range limits for C. aureipalatii are currently unknown and we predict that they may reach as far as the southern bank of the Río Madre de Dios. Current knowledge indicates that Callicebus aureipalatii is distinct from populations north of the Madre de Dios, where animals do not display a golden crown or deep orange throat coloration. These populations have previously been considered to be C. brunneus (Hershkovitz 1988), although Van Roosmalen et al. (2002, see Figure 1, pp.5) classified them as C. dubius. Recent primate surveys in the Cobija region of Pando have photographed Callicebus displaying a white-tipped tail but with no golden crown, and Pando monkeys also lack the characteristic C. dubius white stripe across the forehead (Sandra Suarez, pers. comm., Noel Rowe, pers. comm.).

Film footage of titi monkeys from Los Amigos (12°34′15″W, 70°06′02″S), a northern tributary of the Madre de Dios in southern Peru (Nissen and Trolle, 2003), and photographic evidence from an uncollected specimen at the same site (J. Lawrence, unpubl. data; Fig. 8) lend further support to the hypothesis that C. brunneus extends into northern Bolivia and southern Peru (Hershkovitz 1988, 1990) and provides additional evidence that the new species described here is not found north of the Río Madre de Dios.

It is unclear whether C. aureipalatii belongs to the cupreus or moloch species groups as defined by Van Roosmalen et al. (2002), and genetic studies may be required to determine the correct lineage, particularly as C. cupreus has 46 diploid chromosomes and C. brunneus has 48 diploid chromosomes. Given the information that we have been able to gather regarding Callicebus populations immediately north of the Río Madre de Dios, it seems that the distribution maps detailed by Van Roosmalen et al. (2002) for C. brunneus, C. dubius, and C. cupreus may need to be broadly revised. Indeed the true status and distribution of C. dubius remains doubtful (Groves 1992, 2001).

Examination of relevant Callicebus specimens at the American Musuem of Natural History in New York included one specimen (AMNH262650) purchased from a hunter in Chive (12°23′S, 68°35′W), a small town on the Río Madre de Dios at the border of the departments of La Paz and Pando and very close to neighboring Peru. It is unclear on which side of the Río Madre de Dios the specimen was collected and at the AMNH it is classified as C. brunneus despite being markedly different from the main C. brunneus series collected in Brazil. Although the specimen displays some broad similarities with C. aureipalatii, for example, the rufous coloration on the limbs and general body coloration, neither the orange throat coloration nor golden crown are evident (Fig. 9). In short, further research is required to determine the taxonomic status of Callicebus populations in Pando Department, Bolivia.

This finding, along with other recently published information (Wallace et al. 1996; Wallace and Painter 1999), underlines the poorly known status of Bolivian primate distributions. We suggest that a thorough review of Callicebus distribution in Bolivia is urgently required in order to assess the need for additional conservation measures. A GIS-based analysis of forest cover in the Beni and Pando departments of Bolivia, in conjunction with surveys on both sides of major rivers, might enable targeting of major blocks of forest for future investigation. The need for an examination of genetic material, particularly of the C. modestus and C. olallae populations (Felton et al. 2006), would also be a critical aspect of a thorough review.

The density estimate for C. aureipalatii is similar to the majority of estimates available in the literature for congeners (density ranges, 2.7–400 individuals per km2; Robinson et al. 1987; Pinto et al. 1993; Peres 2000; Chiarello and de Melo 2001; Price et al. 2002). Although the density extrapolation across the known distribution is simplistic, the results strongly suggest that the conservation of a significant population of this primate is ensured within the confines of the Madidi protected area and its official five-kilometer-wide buffer zone. However, potential threats to the lowland portion of Madidi, including such as petroleum exploration and subsequent exploitation, hydroelectric programs, and planned road construction, will need to be monitored in the future with special attention given to this species.

Figure 8.

Callicebus specimen from Los Amigos, southern Peru. Photograph by Jenna Lawrence.

i0898-6207-20-1-29-f08.jpg

Figure 9.

Specimens examined at the American Museum of Natural History; a. Callicebus brunneus series from Brazil; b., c., d., dorsal views of specimen (AMNH262650) collected in Chive, Madre de Dios, Bolivia. Photographs R. B. Wallace and H. Gómez.

i0898-6207-20-1-29-f09.jpg

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the continued support of the Wildlife Conservation Society and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. The Bolivian Protected Area Service (SERNAP) and the Madidi protected area administration kindly provided the due permits for the research. Specimen collection was facilitated through permission from the Dirección General de Biodiversidad. Fortunato Espinoza, Billy Cáceres, Charles Veitch, Lucio Ocampo, Jairo Cáceres, and Jasmani Caceres assisted in the filming and photography of Callicebus across the region. Jesus Martinez and Rodolfo Nallar assisted in the collection of the specimens. Line transect fieldwork was also assisted by Victor-Hugo Caceres, Hugo Aranibar, Boris Rios, Guido Ayala, Nisha Owen and Thomas Barbry. The manuscript was improved following comments from Colin Groves, Anthony Rylands, and an anonymous reviewer.

Literature Cited

1.

S. Anderson 1997. Mammals of Bolivia, taxonomy and distribution. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist 231:1–652. Google Scholar

2.

J. M. Ayres 1985. On a new species of squirrel monkey, genus Saimiri, from Brazilian Amazonia (Primates, Cebidae). Pap. Avuls. Zool., São Paulo 36147–164. Google Scholar

3.

J. M. Ayres and T. H. Clutton Brock . 1992. River boundaries and species range sizes in Amazonian primates. Am. Nat 140:3531–537. Google Scholar

4.

S. Barrera, J. F. Guerra, F. Osorio, J. Sarmiento, and L. Villalba . 1994. Territorio Indigena Reserva de la Biosfera Pilon Lajas: Reconocimiento Preliminar de la Fauna. Unpublished report, Colección Boliviana de Fauna, Instituto de Ecologia (Limnologia) and Veterinarios Sin Fronteras, La Paz, Bolivia. Google Scholar

5.

CARE/WCS/IE/SERNAP 2003. Madidi de Bolivia, Magico, Unico y Nuestro. CD-ROM. Digifilms. La Paz, Bolivia. Google Scholar

6.

A. G. Chiarello and F. R. de Melo . 2001. Primate population densities and sizes in Atlantic forest remnants of northern Espírito Santo, Brazil. Int. J. Primatol 22:3379–396. Google Scholar

7.

L. H. Emmons and F. Feer . 1999. Neotropical Rainforest mammals: A Field Guide. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago. Google Scholar

8.

A. Felton, A. M. Felton, R. B. Wallace, and H. Gómez . 2006. Identification, distribution and behavioral observations of the titi monkeys Callicebus modestus Lönnberg, 1939 and Callicebus olallae Lönnberg, 1939. Primate Conserv 2041–46. Google Scholar

9.

S. F. Ferrari and M. A. Lopes . 1992. A new species of marmoset, genus Callithrix Erxleben 1777 (Callitrichidae, Primates) from western Brazilian Amazon. Goeldiana Zoologia 121–3. Google Scholar

10.

S. F. Ferrari, L. Sena, and M. P C. Schneider . 1999. Definition of a new species of marmoset (Primates: Callitrichinae) from southwestern Amazonia based on molecular, ecological, and zoogeographic evidence. In. Livro de Resumos, IX Congresso Brasileiro de Primatologia. pp. 80–81. Sociedade Brasileira de Primatologia. Santa Teresa, Espírito Santo, Brazil. 25–30 July 1999. Google Scholar

11.

B. Flores, J. G., C. Batte B, and J. Dapara . 2002. Caracterización de la vegetación del Río Undumo y su importancia para la conservación de la fauna silvestre. Ecologia en Bolivia 37:123–45. Google Scholar

12.

H. Gómez, R. B. Wallace, and C. Veitch . 2001. Diversidad y abundancia de mamíferos medianos y grandes en el noreste del área de influencia del Parque Nacional Madidi durante la época húmeda. Ecologia en Bolivia 36:17–29. Google Scholar

13.

H. Gómez, R. B. Wallace, G. Ayala, and F. Espinoza . 2003. Densidad de la ardilla roja amazónica (Familia Sciuridae, Sciurus spadiceus) en el valle del río Tuichi (Parque Nacional y Area Natural de Manejo Integrado Madidi, La Paz, Bolivia). Ecología en Bolivia 38:79–88. Google Scholar

14.

N. Gottdenker, R. B. Wallace, and H. Gómez . 2001. La importancia de los atropellos para la ecologia y conservación: Dinomys branickii, un ejemplo de Bolivia. Ecologia en Bolivia 35:61–67. Google Scholar

15.

C. P. Groves 1992. Book Review: Titis, New World monkeys of the genus Callicebus (Cebidae, Platyrrhini): A preliminary taxonomic review. Fieldiana Zool., New Series 551–109.Int. J. Primatol 13:1111–112. Google Scholar

16.

C. P. Groves 2001. Primate Taxonomy. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington, DC. Google Scholar

17.

A. B. Hennessey 2002a. Red Data Bird – Wattled Curassow. World Bird Watch 24:230–31. Google Scholar

18.

A. B. Hennessey 2002b. First Bolivian observation of Swallow-tailed Cotinga Phibalura flavirostris boliviana in 98 years. Cotinga 1754–55. Google Scholar

19.

A. B. Hennessey and M. I. Gómez . 2003. Four bird species new to Bolivia: An ornithological survey of the yungas site Tokoaque, Madidi National Park. Cotinga 1925–33. Google Scholar

20.

P. Hershkovitz 1988. Origin, speciation dispersal of South American titi monkeys, genus Callicebus (family Cebidae, Platyrrhini). Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 140:1240–272. Google Scholar

21.

P. Hershkovitz 1990. Titis, New World monkeys of the genus Callicebus (Cebidae, Platyrrhini): A preliminary taxonomic review. Fieldiana, Zoology, New Series 551–109. Google Scholar

22.

S. Kobayashi 1995. A phylogenetic study of titi monkeys, genus Callicebus, based on cranial measurements: I. Phyletic groups of Callicebus. Primates 36:1101–120. Google Scholar

23.

S. Kobayashi and A. Langguth . 1999. A new species of titi monkey, Callicebus Thomas, from north-eastern Brazil (Primates, Cebidae). Rev. Bras. Zool 16:2531–551. Google Scholar

24.

R. A. Mittermeier, M. Schwarz, and J. M. Ayres . 1992. A new species of marmoset, genus Callithrix Erxleben 1777 (Callitrichidae, Primates), from the Río Maués region, state of Amazonas, Central Brazilian Amazon. Goeldiana Zoologia 141–17. Google Scholar

25.

T. Nissen and M. Trolle . 2003. Amazon Conservation Association Video Images of 2003. Amazon Conservation Association. Washington, DC. Google Scholar

26.

C. A. Peres 2000. Evaluating the impact and sustainability of subsistence hunting at multiple Amazonian forest sites. In Hunting for Sustainability in Tropical Forests. J. G. Robinson and E. L. Bennett , editors. (eds.), pp. 31–56.Columbia University Press. New York. Google Scholar

27.

L. P S. Pinto, C. M R. Costa, K. B. Strier, and G. A B. da Fonseca . 1993. Habitat, density and group size of primates in a Brazilian tropical forest. Folia Primatol 61:135–143. Google Scholar

28.

E. C. Price, H. M. Piedade, and D. Wormell . 2002. Population densities of primates in a Brazilian Atlantic forest. Folia Primatol 73:54–56. Google Scholar

29.

J. V. Remsen and T. A. Parker . 1995. Bolivia has the opportunity to create the planet's richest park for terrestrial biota. Bird Cons. Int 5:181–199. Google Scholar

30.

B. Ríos, R. B. Wallace, H. Aranibar, and C. Veitch . 2001. Evaluación de mamíferos medianos y grandes en el bosque semideciduo del alto Tuichi (PN y ANMI Madidi, Dpto. La Paz). Ecologia en Bolivia 36:31–38. Google Scholar

31.

B. Ríos Uzeda, J. Vargas, and R. B. Wallace . 2004. Un nuevo registro de mamífero para Bolivia: La jayupa de la altura (Cuniculus taczanowskii, Rodentia, Cuniculidae). Mastozool. Neotropical 11:5–10. Google Scholar

32.

J. G. Robinson, P. C. Wright, and W. G. Kinzey . 1987. Monogamous cebids and their relatives: Intergroup calls and spacing. In Primate societies. B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T. T. Struhsaker , editors. (eds.), pp. 44–53.University of Chicago Press. Chicago. London. Google Scholar

33.

D. I. Rumiz and W. R. Townsend , editors. (eds). 1999. Programa de Fauna Silvestre para la Tierra Comunitaria de Origen y Reserva de Biosfera Pilon Lajas: Informe Final Presentado a Veterinarios Sin Fronteras. Unpublished report, Museo de Historia Natural Noel Kempff Mercado, U.A.G.R.M., Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia. Google Scholar

34.

A. B. Rylands, H. Schneider, A. Langguth, R. A. Mittermeier, C. P. Groves, and E. Rodríguez-Luna . 2000. An assessment of the diversity of New World primates. Neotrop. Primates 8:261–93. Google Scholar

35.

J. Sarmiento, S. Barrera, J. Vargas, C. Quiroga, and C. Cortez . 2001. Evaluación de la fauna de vertebrados de la formación de bosque alto en la región de Alto Madidi (PNANMI Madidi). Unpublished report, Colección Boliviana de Fauna and Conservation Internacional, Programa Bolivia, La Paz, Bolivia. Google Scholar

36.

J. S. Silva Jr. and Mde A. Noronha . 1998. On a new species of bare-eared marmoset, genus Callithrix Erxleben, 1777, from central Amazonia, Brazil (Primates: Callitrichidae). Goeldiana Zoologia 211–28. Google Scholar

37.

R. Stanyon, S. Tofanelli, M. A. Morescalchi, G. Agoramoorthy, O. A. Ryder, and J. Winberg . 1995. Cytogenetic analysis shows extensive genomic rearrangements between red howler (Alouatta seniculus Linnaeus) subspecies. Am. J. Primatol 35:171–183. Google Scholar

38.

T. Tarifa, J. Rechberger, R. B. Wallace, and A. Nuñez . 2001. Confirmación de la presencia de Odocoileus virginianus (Artiodactyla, Cervidae) en Bolivia, y datos preliminares sobre su ecología y su simpatria con Hippocamelus antisensis. Ecologia en Bolivia 35:41–49. Google Scholar

39.

L. Thomas, J. L. Laake, S. Strindberg, F. Marques, D. L. Borchers, S. T. Buckland, D. R. Anderson, K. P. Burnham, S. L. Hedley, and J. H. Pollard . 2001. Distance 4.0. Beta 1. Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment, University of St. Andrews. St. Andrews, UK. Google Scholar

40.

M. G M. Van Roosmalen, T. van Roosmalen, R. A. Mittermeier, and G. A B. da Fonseca . 1998. A new and distinctive species of marmoset (Callitrichidae, Primates) from the lower Río Aripuanã, state of Amazonas, central Brazilian Amazon. Goeldiana Zoologia 22:1–27. Google Scholar

41.

M. G M. Van Roosmalen, T. van Roosmalen, R. A. Mittermeier, and A. B. Rylands . 2000. Two new species of marmoset, genus Callithrix Erxleben 1777 (Callitrichidae, Primates), from the Tapajós/Madeira interfluve, south Central Amazonia, Brazil. Neotrop. Primates 8:12–19. Google Scholar

42.

M. G M. Van Roosmalen, T. van Roosmalen, and R. A. Mittermeier . 2002. A taxonomic review of the titi monkeys, genus Callicebus Thomas, 1903, with the description of two new species, Callicebus bernhardi and Callicebus stephennashi, from Brazilian Amazonia. Neotrop. Primates 10:suppl1–52. Google Scholar

43.

R. B. Wallace and R. L E. Painter . 1999. A new primate record for Bolivia: An apparently isolated population of common woolly monkeys representing a southern range extension for the genus Lagothrix. Neotrop. Primates 7:4111–113. Google Scholar

44.

R. B. Wallace, R. L E. Painter, A. B. Taber, and J. M. Ayres . 1996. Notes on a distributional river boundary and southern range extension for two species of Amazonian primates. Neotrop. Primates 4:4149–151. Google Scholar
Robert B. Wallace, Humberto Gómez, Annika Felton, and Adam M. Felton "On a New Species of Titi Monkey, Genus Callicebus Thomas (Primates, Pitheciidae), from Western Bolivia with Preliminary Notes on Distribution and Abundance," Primate Conservation 2006(20), 29-39, (1 May 2006). https://doi.org/10.1896/0898-6207.20.1.29
Received: 1 November 2003; Accepted: 20 April 2005; Published: 1 May 2006
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top