Translator Disclaimer
11 August 2020 Topotype-based redescription of the leech Torix tukubana (Hirudinida: Glossiphoniiformes: Glossiphoniidae)
Author Affiliations +

A poorly-known proboscidate leech species, Torix tukubana (Oka, 1935), in which the mid-body somites are biannulate dorsally and triannulate ventrally, is redescribed based on new specimens collected from its type locality, Mt. Tsukubasan in Honshu, Japan. The redescription provides the internal digestive and genital organs of T. tukubana for the first time. Our observation reveals that this species possesses equal-sized 1st–6th pairs of crop ceca that are nondiverticulated and tubular ovisacs running alongside the ventral nerve cord. Additionally, phylogenetic analyses using nuclear 18S rRNA, mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I, 12S rRNA, tRNALeu, and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 markers reveal that T. tukubana is closely related to the Palearctic Hemiclepsis Vejdovský, 1884, in which the mid-body somites are triannulate.

The leech family Glossiphoniidae is a diversified group of proboscidate leeches, with over 200 described species from worldwide (Sket & Trontelj 2008). While the mid-body somite of most glossiphoniid species consists of three annuli (triannulate), it is further subdivided in species of Haementeria De Filippi, 1849 exceptionally, and some species possess reduced two-annuli (biannulate) mid-body somites. Although several genera have been established for these biannulate species, recent molecular phylogenetic studies have revealed that the biannulation of mid-body somites evolved in parallel within Glossiphoniidae (Light & Siddall 1999, Siddall et al. 2005, Oceguera-Figueroa 2012). One of the biannulate genera, i.e., Oligobdella Mo3ore, 1928, has already been synonymized with the triannulate Placobdella Blanchard, 1893 (Siddall et al. 2005), and O. brasiliensis Cordero, 1937 has been transferred to Haementeria (Oceguera-Figueroa 2012).

The biannulate glossiphoniid genus Oligoclepsis Oka, 1935 was erected along with a description of its type species O. tukubana Oka, 1935 based on three specimens collected from Mt. Tsukubasan (“mont Tukuba” in the description) on the island of Honshu in Japan (Oka 1935). The genus was characterized by mid-body somites that are biannulate dorsally and triannulate ventrally, and the possession of numerous papillae on the dorsal surface. Oligoclepsis was later placed into the genus Torix Blanchard, 1893, along with other species, in which mid-body somites are at least biannulate dorsally, inhabiting the Eastern Palearctic as well as Northeastern Oriental regions (Sawyer 1986). However, little is known regarding internal morphology of the type species of Torix, T. mirus Blanchard, 1893 described from Cao Bang, Vietnam (Blanchard 1893, 1898), and three species of the genus (including T. tukubana) described from Japan (Oka 1925a, b, 1935).

Compared to the Nearctic biannulate leeches, few molecular phylogenetic analyses of the Palearctic species has been performed. Glossiphonia baicalensis (Stschegolew, 1922) (originally Torix baicalensis), which is a biannulate species endemic to Lake Baikal (Stschegolew 1922, Lukin & Epshtein 1960a, Kaygorodova 2012), is exceptional in that its phylogenetic position was estimated to be within the triannulate genus Glossiphonia Johnson, 1816 (Light & Siddall 1999, Siddall et al. 2005). Consequently, a precise understanding of systematic accounts of the Palearctic biannulate taxa has been hampered by a lack of both of morphological and molecular backbones.

As the first step in re-evaluating the systematic status of Torix leeches, especially those inhabiting Japan and adjacent areas, contemporary specimens matching the description of T. tukubana (Oka 1935) were collected from the type locality. In this paper, their external and internal morphological characters are fully provided, revisiting the taxonomic status of this species. In addition, the phylogenetic position of T. tukubana within Glossiphoniidae is estimated based on nuclear and mitochondrial genetic markers.

Materials and Methods

Sampling and morphological examination.—Leech specimens were collected from the type locality of T. tukubana, Mt. Tsukubasan in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. Leeches were found in mountain streams. Altitude and coordinates for the localities were obtained using a Garmin eTrex GPS unit.

The collected leeches were individually kept at 16°C in the laboratory to digest their blood meal. Subsequently, the specimens were relaxed by the gradual addition of 99% ethanol to freshwater. A quarter of the caudal sucker was taken from every specimen for DNA extraction and the remaining bodies were fixed in 10% formalin and preserved in 70% ethanol. The following four body measurements were taken: body length from the anterior margin of the oral sucker to the posterior margin of the caudal sucker (BL), maximum body width (BW), caudal sucker length from the anterior margin to the posterior margin of the sucker (CL), and caudal sucker width from the right to the left margins of the sucker (CW). Examination, dissection and drawing of the specimens were accomplished under stereoscopic microscopes with a drawing tube (Leica M125C and Olympus SZX7). Images of the specimens were captured with the aid of a Leica MC170 HD digital camera mounted on the Leica M125C, and assembled using Leica Application Suite v. 4.12 software. Specimens used in this study have been deposited in the Zoological Collection of Kyoto University (KUZ).

The leech collection at the National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba, Japan (NSMT) including most of Oka's leech collection (Nakano 2010) was surveyed to confirm whether the type series of T. tukubana remains. Although a portion of Oka's collection is kept at The University Museum, The University of Tokyo (UMUT), its type series was not discovered in the UMUT zoological collection (Nakano & Itoh 2011).

The somite numbering convention is based on Moore (1927): body somites are denoted by Roman numerals and the annuli in each somite are given alphanumeric designations.

Molecular phylogenetic analysis.—The phylogenetic position of Torix tukubana within Glossiphoniidae was determined based on one nuclear and three mitochondrial gene markers: (1) 18S rRNA (18S), (2) cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI), (3) 12S rRNA, tRNAVal, and 16S rRNA (12S–16S), and (4) tRNALeu and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (tRNALeu–ND1). Total DNA of each specimen was extracted from the caudal sucker using phenol/chloroform extraction with “DNA sui-sui” buffer (Rizo Inc.). The primer sets, methods and cycle conditions used in the polymerase chain reactions (PCR) and cycle sequencing reactions basically followed Nakano and Lai (2016) except for the usage of a primer, LCO-inerpo2 (Nakano 2016), instead of LCO-in (Nakano 2012) for COI, and PCR reaction kit, EmeraldAmp PCR Master Mix (Takara Bio). In total, four molecular markers of four specimens of T. tukubana were newly obtained in this study and deposited with the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) through the DNA Data Bank of Japan (Table 1).

Table 1

Samples with voucher numbers, collection country, and International Nucleotide Sequences Database Collaboration (INSDC) accession numbers used for molecular analyses. Sequences marked with an asterisk (*) were obtained for the first time in the present study; T. tukubana samples marked with two asterisks (**) were only used for genetic distance analyses. Acronym: KUZ, the Zoological Collection of Kyoto University.


According to the previous phylogenetic studies (Siddall et al. 2005, de Carle et al. 2017), 25 glossiphoniid operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were included as ingroup taxa (Table 1). Additionally, three proboscidate oceanobdelliforms and one acanthobdellidan species were selected as the outgroup taxa. The protein and RNA genes were aligned using TranslatorX with the default setting (Abascal et al. 2010) and MAFFT v. 7.427 with the L-INS-i option (Katoh and Standley 2013), respectively. The length of the 18S, COI, 12S, and tRNALeu–ND1 sequences were 1879, 662, 370, and 704 bp, respectively. The concatenated sequences yielded 3615 bp of aligned positions.

Phylogenetic trees were inferred with maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) methods. The best-fit partition scheme and substitution models were identified with AICc using IQ-TREE v. 1.6.12 (Nguyen et al. 2015) as follows: for 18S, SYM + I + G; GTR + G for COI first position; GTR + G for COI second position; GTR + I + G for COI third position; GTR + G for 12S and tRNALeu; GTR + I + G for ND1 first position; GTR + G for ND1 second position; and HKY + G for ND1 third position. The ML phylogeny was inferred using IQ-TREE, then a nonparametric bootstrapping (BS) was conducted with 1000 pseudoreplicates. BI tree and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PPs) were obtained using MrBayes v. 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012). Two independent runs of four Markov chains were conducted for 20 million generations, and a tree was sampled every 100 generations. The parameter estimates and convergence were checked using Tracer v. 1.7.1 (Rambaut et al. 2018), and the first 20,001 trees were discarded based on the result.

Pairwise comparisons of the uncorrected p-distance for COI sequences (651 bp) obtained from the present T. tukubana specimens and another population from Hiroshima in eastern Honshu (Kambayashi et al. 2019) (Table 1), as well as those from the species closely related to T. tukubana revealed by the present phylogenetic analyses were calculated using MEGA X (Kumar et al. 2018).


Genus Torix Blanchard, 1893
Torix tukubana (Oka, 1935)
(Figs. 1, 2).

  • Oligoclepsis tukubana Oka, 1935: 66–68, one text figure; Autrum 1936: 36, fig. 24; Lukin & Epshtein 1960b: 479; Soós 1969: 427; Lukin 1976: 290–291, fig. 138.

  • Torix tukubana; Sawyer 1986: 655; Yoshida 2009: 47, figs. 1, 2; Kambayashi et al. 2019: 664–665, fig. 1; Sasaki 2019: 8, figs. 3, 5.

  • Amended diagnosis.—Body greenish. Caudal sucker ventral, oval. Somites XIII–XXIV dorsally biannulate, ventrally triannulate. Anus between somites XXVI/ XXVII. Male gonopore between somites XI/XII, female gonopore between somite XII (a1 + a2)/a3, gonopores separated by 1 annulus XII (a1 + a2). Eyes in 2 pairs, in “placobdellid” arrangement; 1st pair inconspicuous on somite II, often coalescing with large conspicuous 2nd pair on somite III. Dorsal papillae on IV–XXV, ca. 13–20 on every mid-body annulus of somites XIV–XXI. Mouth pore on anterior margin of oral sucker. Salivary cells in 1 pair of compact mass. Esophagus simple, esophageal grand absent. Bacteriosomes absent. Crop giving rise to 7 pairs of crop ceca, 1st–6th pairs simple, nondiverticulated, 7th pair (post-crop ceca) diverticulated into 4 sections. Intersomital testisacs in 6 pairs. Paired sperm ducts thick, strongly coiled. Atrial cornua directed anterolaterally, developed ovate. Paired ovisacs tubular, reaching to somite XII (a1 + a2).

  • Material examined.—A total of four specimens newly collected at the type locality, Mt. Tsukubasan, Ibaraki Prefecture, Honshu island, Japan, by CK and TN, on 23 May 2019. Three free-living specimens attached to the underside of stones in mountain streams: KUZ Z2971–Z2972 (36°23′40″N, 140°10′77″E; elev. 521 m), and KUZ Z2973 (36°23′09″N, 140°10′45″E; elev. 660 m). One juvenile specimen, KUZ Z2970, attached to the surface of the Tago's brown frog, Rana tagoi Okada, 1928, collected in a mountain stream (36°23′45″N, 140°10′68″E; elev. 527 m). Internal morphology was provided based on the two specimens (KUZ Z2972 and Z2973).

  • Name-bearing types.—The three specimens in the original description of T. tukubana (Oka 1935) are automatically fixed as the syntypes according to the Article 73.2 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature 1999). However, no type series of T. tukubana was found at NSMT. Syntypes are believed to have been lost or destroyed in the past according to the present survey and Nakano & Itoh (2010), nonetheless, a neotype is not designated for T. tukubana in the present study. There is no doubt over the identity of the species as Torix tukubana, given the fact that no other biannulate glossiphoniid species were not found at the type locality of this species.

  • Redescription.—Body ovate (Fig. 1AC). Caudal sucker ventral, oval (Fig. 1B). Measurements (mean, followed by ranges in parentheses; n = 3, KUZ Z2971–Z2973): BL 9.73 mm (7.36–11.1), BW 4.11 mm (2.47–6.48), CL 2.16 mm (1.41–2.93), CW 1.93 mm (1.38–2.57).

  • Somite I completely merged with prostomium (Figs. 1D, 2A). Somites II (= peristomium), III and IV uniannulate (Figs. 1D, 2A); somite IV forming posterior margin of oral sucker. Somites V–VII uniannulate, often with slight dorsal furrow respectively. Somites VIII–XII both dorsally and ventrally biannulate, (a1 + a2) > a3. Somites XIII–XXIV dorsally biannulate, (a1 + a2) > a3, ventrally triannulate, a1 = a2 < a3, ventral annular furrow between a1 and a2 slightly shallow (Fig. 1EG); somite XXIV a3 being ventrally last complete annulus. Somite XXV biannulate, (a1 + a2) > a3 (Fig. 1F, G). Somites XXVI and XXVII both dorsally and ventrally uniannulate (Fig. 1F, G). Anus between somites XXVI/XXVII; somite XXVII being post-anal annulus (Fig. 1F, G).

  • Clitellum unobservable.

  • Male gonopore between XI/XII (Fig. 1E). Female gonopore between XII (a1 + a2)/a3 (Fig. 1E). Gonopores separated by 1 annulus.

  • Eyes in 2 pairs, almost completely coalesced, right and left eyes well separated from each other, on posterior margin of II, or on II–III (Fig. 1D). Dorsal papillae on IV–XXV, ca. 13–20 on every mid-body annulus of XIV–XXI, forming 1 inconspicuous transverse row on posterior margin of (a1 + a2), and on middle of a3 of each mid-body somite, respectively; slightly larger on both distal margins on (a1 + a2); 2 faint longitudinal rows detectable (Fig. 1A, D, F, G). Ventral sensillae in 1 pair located posterior margin of (a1 + a2) or a2 of each of VIII–XXIII.

  • Nephridiopores undetectable.

  • Mouth pore on anterior margin of oral sucker (Fig. 1B). Proboscis in membranous sheath reaching to XI/XII, without forming loop (Fig. 2A). Salivary cells arranged in 1 pair of compact mass between somites VIII a3–XI (a1 + a2) (Fig. 2A); ductules not forming bundle, inserting independently into base of proboscis in XI (Fig. 2A). Esophagus simple, not recurved (Fig. 2A); esophageal grand absent. Bacteriosomes absent. Crop reaching to XIX/XX, giving rise to 7 pairs of crop ceca (Fig. 2A); 1st–6th pairs crop ceca simple, nondiverticulated, almost equal in size: 1st pair in XIII (a1 + a2)–XIV (a1 + a2); 2nd pair in XIV (a1 + a2)–a3; 3rd pair in XV (a1 + a2)–a3; 4th pair in XVI (a1 + a2)–a3; 5th pair in XVII (a1 + a2)–a3; 6th pair in XVIII (a1 + a2)–a3; and 7th pair (post-crop ceca) diverticulated into 4 sections, in XIX (a1 + a2)–XXII (a1 + a2). Intestinal ceca in 4 pairs (Fig. 2A): 1st pair in XIX (a1 + a2)–XX (a1 + a2); 2nd pair in XX (a1 + a2)–a3; 3rd pair in XXI (a1 + a2)–XXII (a1 + a2); 4th pair in XXI a3–XXII a3. Rectum simple tubular (Fig. 2A).

  • Testisacs in 6 pairs, intersomital (Fig. 2A): 1st pair in XIII a3–XIV (a1 + a2); 2nd pair in XIV a3–XV (a1 + a2); 3rd pair in XV a3–XVI (a1 + a2); 4th pair in XVI a3–XVII (a1 + a2); 5th pair in XVII a3–XVIII (a1 + a2); 6th pair in XVIII a3–XIX (a1 + a2). Paired sperm ducts thick, strongly coiled, in XI–XIII (Fig. 2A, B). Pair of muscular atrial cornua directed anterolaterally, developed ovate, in XI a3–XII (a1 + a2) (Fig. 2A, B).

  • One pair of ovisacs tubular, thin-walled, slightly folded running alongside ventral nerve cord, in XII (a1 + a2) to XIV a3–XV a3 (Fig. 2B, C); both ovisacs reaching to XII (a1 + a2), then turned posteromedially toward female gonopore.

  • Juvenile morphology.—Measurements (KUZ Z2970): BL 2.64 mm, BW 1.19 mm, CL 0.94 mm, CW 0.96 mm. Somites I–XXIV uniannulate, with slight dorsal furrow on each of VII–XXIV, and with slight ventral furrow of each of XV–XXIV. Eyes in 2 pairs: 1st pair on posterior margin of II; 2nd pair on anterior margin of III (Fig. 1H). Male and female gonopore undetectable. Dorsal papillae and ventral sensillae undeveloped.

  • Coloration.—In life, dorsal surface uniform green, white and green mottled on distal margin (Fig. 1C); ventral surface transparent. Color faded in preservative; uniform pale green or yellowish grey (Fig. 1A, B).

  • Host preference.—Two out of three individuals of the Tago's brown frog, Rana tagoi, were infested by T. tukubana. One host frog and the attaching leech were collected. Although six individuals of the Tsukuba clawed salamander, Onychodactylus tsukubaensis Yoshikawa & Matsui, 2013, were also observed, none were parasitized by leeches.

  • Molecular analyses.—The ML (ln L = –23026.468; Fig. 3) and BI (mean ln L = –22972.413; not shown) trees had the same topology. In the trees, the monophyly of the family Glossiphoniidae was fully supported (BS = 100%, PP = 1.0). The 10 glossiphoniid genera analyzed here consisted of three monophyletic lineages: Placobdella (BS = 93%, PP = 0.91), Helobdella Blanchard, 1896 + Haementeria (BS = 90%, PP = 1.0), and remaining seven genera (BS = 66%, PP = 0.93) divided into two subclades. The first subclade includes Glossiphonia and Alboglossiphonia Lukin, 1976 (BS = 100%, PP = 1.0), and the second subclade consist of the genus Hemiclepsis Vejdovský, 1884, Marsupiobdella Goddard & Malan, 1912, Batracobdelloides Oosthuizen, 1984, Theromyzon Philippi, 1867, and T. tukubana, but the monophyly of this subclade was not fully supported (BS = 60%, PP = 0.84). Torix tukubana formed a highly supported clade with Hemiclepsis (BS = 97%, PP = 1.0).

  • The pairwise COI uncorrected p-distances between the present T. tukubana specimens and the population from Hiroshima was 3.2–4.0% (mean = 3.6%), and those between the topotypic T. tukubana and Hemiclepsis species was 14–16% (mean = 15%) (Table 2).

  • The four COI sequences obtained from three matured and one juvenile leeches are almost concordant with each other. Although four polymorphic sites were found from 1267 sequenced sites (0.32%), this value fell into the intraspecific divergence among the other glossiphoniid leeches (de Carle et al. 2017), indicating that all four specimens used here are unquestionably conspecific.

  • Remarks.—The present mature individuals with testisacs that were fully developed were unquestionably identified as T. tukubana because of the fact that they possessed mid-body somites that were biannulate dorsally and triannulate ventrally, and ca. 13–20 developed papillae on the dorsal surface of somites XIV–XXI (16 or 17 papillae on each annulus of somites XVI–XVIII were depicted in the original description) (Oka 1935). However, the morphological characteristics of the immature individual, in which the gonopores are undeveloped, highlighted the fact that these diagnostic features are ontogenetic traits in this species as already stated in another population from Hiroshima in eastern Honshu identified as T. tukubana in a previous study (Kambayashi et al. 2019). The immature specimen bore mid-body somites that were also biannulate ventrally and a smooth dorsal surface without papillae. Additionally, the number of eyes can be considered ontogenetic because mature individuals have one pair of eyes and an immature individual has two pairs of eyes.

  • The present results, which revealed the internal digestive and genital features of T. tukubana for the first time, and previous taxonomic studies (Blanchard 1893, 1898, Oka 1925a, b, Moore 1930a, b, Lukin & Epshtein 1960b) show that T. tukubana clearly differs from other Asian congeners in having a male gonopore between XI/XII, nondiverticulated equal-sized 1st–6th crop ceca, and tubular ovisacs (see Table 3). In addition to the Torix species, a glossiphoniid Parabdella quadrioculata (Moore, 1930) was recorded as the amphibian-reptile parasitic leech from Japan (Yamauchi et al. 2013). Torix tukubana is clearly distinguishable from P. quadrioculata by its mid-body somites that are biannulate (triannulate in P. quadrioculata; Moore 1930b), anus opening between XXVI/ XXVII (behind XXVII), and nondiverticulated crop ceca (diverticulated; Yang 1996).

  • It is noteworthy that the COI uncorrected p-distances between the topotypic T. tukubana and the Hiroshima population investigated by Kambayashi et al. (2019) were higher than the intraspecific divergence calculated for the glossiphoniid Placobdella species (de Carle et al. 2017). Therefore, the population indigenous to Hiroshima may belong to a different species from T. tukubana. Its taxonomic status should be clarified in future studies.

  • Fig. 1

    Torix tukubana (Oka, 1935), collected from Mt. Tsukubasan, Japan; KUZ Z2973 (A–F), KUZ Z2972 (G), KUZ Z2970 (H). A, Dorsal view; B, ventral view; C, dorsal view of live animal; D, dorsal view of anterior end; E, ventral view of mid-body somites; F, G, dorsal view of posterior end; H, dorsal view of anterior end. Scale bars: 5 mm (A–C), 1 mm (D–G), 0.25 mm (H). Abbreviations: an, anus; fg, female gonopore; mg, male gonopore; mp, mouth pore.


    Fig. 2

    Torix tukubana (Oka, 1935), KUZ Z2972, collected from Mt. Tsukubasan, Japan. A, Dorsal view of digestive tract and male genital organs; B, dorsal view of male atrium including ovisacs and positions of ganglia XI–XV; C, dorsal view of female reproductive system including positions of ganglia XII–XV; a portion of left ovisac being lost during dissection. Scale bars: 2 mm (A), 0.5 mm (B), 0.25 mm (C). Abbreviations: ac, atrial cornu; agm, anterior ganglionic mass; cc, crop cecum; es, esophagus; ic, intestinal cecum; ov, ovisac; pb, proboscis; pcc, post-crop cecum; rt, rectum; sd, sperm duct; scm, salivary cells mass; ts, testisac.


    Fig. 3

    Maximum likelihood tree for 3615 bp of nuclear 18S rRNA and mitochondrial COI, 12S rRNA, tRNALeu and ND1 markers. Numbers on nodes represent bootstrap values for maximum likelihood and Bayesian posterior probabilities.


    Table 2

    Uncorrected p-distances calculated for the available COI sequences of the topotypic Torix tukubana, the Hiroshima population identified as T. tukubana by Kambayashi et al. (2019), and Hemiclepsis species included in the phylogenetic analyses.


    Table 3

    Comparisons of morphological characters between Torix tukubana (Oka, 1935) and four congeneric species.



    The topology of the obtained phylogenies was almost concordant with the previous study (de Carle et al. 2017) showing that glossiphoniid leeches comprise three clades, i.e., Placobdella, Helobdella + Haementeria, and the other genera including Alboglossiphonia, Glossiphonia, Hemiclepsis, Marsupiobdella, Batracobdelloides, and Theromyzon. Our phylogenies revealed that T. tukubana forms a monophyletic lineage with Hemiclepsis. The present phylogenies and those in previous studies (Light & Siddall 1999, Siddall et al. 2005) also clarified that Glossiphonia includes the Palearctic biannulate species G. baicalensis. Moreover, the clade consisting of Glossiphonia and Alboglossiphonia was phylogenetically distinct from the clade comprising Hemiclepsis and T. tukubana. Therefore, the present results highlight that biannulation of the mid-body somites has evolved independently within the Palearctic glossiphoniid species, as can be seen in glossiphoniid leeches indigenous to the New World (Oceguera-Figueroa 2012).

    The genus-level classification of T. tukubana still remains problematic. The present results led to the following alternatives for the generic status of T. tukubana: (1) T. tukubana would remain within Torix; (2) T. tukubana would be placed under Hemiclepsis; or (3) Oligoclepsis would be resurrected for T. tukubana. Members of Hemiclepsis in which mid-body somites are triannulate are endemic to the Palearctic region, and they infest freshwater fish, mollusks including bivalves, and amphibians (e.g., Nagasawa & Miyakawa 2006, Tanaka et al. 2017, Bolotov et al. 2019). Hemiclepsis leeches having 9–11 pairs of crop ceca (Sawyer 1986) clearly differ from T. tukubana and the other Torix species that possess seven pairs of crop ceca. Given this clear morphological difference, we do not transfer T. tukubana into the genus Hemiclepsis. It is also difficult to conclude whether T. tukubana should be placed within Torix or classified under its original genus Oligoclepsis, because the internal anatomy and phylogenetic position of T. mirus, which is the type species of Torix, remain veiled. Consequently, we tentatively regard T. tukubana as a member of Torix without revalidating Oligoclepsis for this species.

    According to the external morphology of T. mirus and other congeners, Torix can be characterized by the mid-body somites that are at least biannulate dorsally. Based on the internal anatomy of T. cotylifer Blanchard, 1898, T. orientalis (Oka, 1925), T. tagoi (Oka, 1925) and T. tukubana (Oka 1925a, b, Moore 1930b, Lukin & Epshtein 1960b, present study), additionally, the seven pairs of crop ceca can be also treated as a tentative diagnostic character of this genus. Further morphological and phylogenetic studies are needed to elucidate the precise systematic status of Torix and its species.

    Torix tukubana inhabiting Mt. Tsukubasan was observed to suck only the Tago's brown frog, Rana tagoi, although the individuals of the Tsukuba clawed salamander, Onychodactylus tsukubaensis, were found in the same location. Therefore, this ranid frog was deemed to be a preferred host species of T. tukubana in the type locality. On the other hand, T. tukubana from the other population in Hiroshima, Japan is known to infest two ranid frog species as well as a salamander Onychodactylus japonicus (Houttuyn, 1782) (Kambayashi et al. 2019), suggesting that the host specificity of T. tukubana could be diverse among populations. Our study based on topotypic specimens of T. tukubana sheds light on the systematic account and host preferences of this species. Further faunal surveys and taxonomic studies of T. tukubana as well as other Torix species are necessary to clarify the species diversity and evolutionary history of Sino-Japanese biannulate glossiphoniid leeches.


    We are grateful to Dr. Hironori Komatsu (NSMT) for allowing us to survey the leech collection at NSMT, and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on this manuscript. The first author thanks Dr. Ryosuke Kakehashi (Nagahama Institute of Bio-Science and Technology) for providing helpful advice on this study. The authors also thank Mr. Michael Luetchford (Edanz Group) for editing a draft of this manuscript. This study was financially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant numbers JP17K20064, JP18K14780 and JP18H02497.

    Literature Cited


    Abascal, F., R. Zardoya, & M. J. Telford. 2010. TranslatorX: multiple alignment of nucleotide sequences guided by amino acid translations. Nucleic Acids Research 38: W7–W13. Google Scholar


    Autrum, H. 1936. Dr. H. G. Bronns Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs. 4. Band: Vermes. III. Abteilung: Annelides. 4. Buch: Hirudineen. Teil 1. Akademische Verlagsgeslellschaft M. B. H., Leipzig, 96 pp. Google Scholar


    Blanchard, R. 1893. Torix mirus (novum genus, nova species). Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France 18: 185–186. Google Scholar


    Blanchard, R. 1898. Nouveau type d'Hirudinée (Torix mirus). Bulletin Scientifique de la France et la Belgique 28: 339–344. Google Scholar


    Bolotov. I. N., A. L. Klass, A. V. Kondakov, I. V. Vikhrev, Y. V. Bespalaya, M. Y. Gofarov, B. Y. Filippov, A. E. Bogan, M. Lopes-Lima, Z. Lunn, N. Chan, O. V. Aksenova, G. A. Dvoryankin, Y. E. Chapurina, S. K. Kim, Y. S. Kolosova, E. S. Konopleva, J. H. Lee, A. A. Makhrov, D. M. Palatov, E. M. Sayenko, V. M. Spitsyn, S. E. Sokolova, A. A. Tomilova, T. Win, N. A. Zubrii, & M. V. Vinarski. 2019. Freshwater mussels house a diverse mussel-associated leech assemblage. Scientific Reports 9: 16449. Google Scholar


    de Carle, D., A. Oceguera-Figueroa, M. Tessler, M. E. Siddall, & S. Kvist. 2017. Phylogenetic analysis of Placobdella (Hirudinea: Rhynchobdellida: Glossiphoniidae) with consideration of COI variation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 114: 234–248. Google Scholar


    International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 4th edition. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, 306 pp. Google Scholar


    Kambayashi, C., A. Kurabayashi, & T. Nakano. 2019. Evaluating the ontogenetic external morphology of an ectoparasitic Torix tukubana (Hirudinida: Glossiphoniidae), with records of its new host amphibian species. Parasitology Research 118: 663–666. Google Scholar


    Katoh, K., & D. M. Standley. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780. Google Scholar


    Kaygorodova, I. A. 2012. A revised checklist of the Lake Baikal Hirudinida fauna. Lauterbornia 75: 49–62. Google Scholar


    Kumar, S., G. Stecher, M. Li, C. Knyaz, & K. Tamura. 2018. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35: 1547–1549. Google Scholar


    Light, J. E., & M. E. Siddall. 1999. Phylogeny of the leech family Glossiphoniidae based on mitochondrial gene sequences and morphological data. The Journal of Parasitology 85: 815–823. Google Scholar


    Lukin, E. I. 1976. Fauna USSR. Leeches. Nauka, Leningrad, 484 pp. [In Russian] Google Scholar


    Lukin, E. I., & V. M. Epshtein. 1960a. Endemic Baikalian leeches of the Glossiphonidae family. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 131: 457–460. [In Russian] Google Scholar


    Lukin, E. I., & V. M. Epshtein. 1960b. Leeches of the subfamily Toricinae subfam. n. and their geographical distribution. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 134: 478–481. [In Russian] Google Scholar


    Moore, J. P. 1927. The segmentation (metamerism and annulation) of the Hirudinea. Pp. 1–12. in Harding, W. A., & J. P. Moore, The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Hirudinea. Taylor & Francis, London, 302pp. Google Scholar


    Moore, J. P. 1930a. The leeches (Hirudinea) of China. The Peking Society of Natural History Bulletin 4: 39–43. Google Scholar


    Moore, J. P. 1930b. Leeches (Hirudinea) from China with descriptions of new species. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 82: 169–192. Google Scholar


    Nagasawa, K., & M. Miyakawa. 2006. Infection of Japanese eel Anguilla japonica Elvers by Hemiclepsis marginata (Hirudinida: Glossiphoniidae). Journal of the Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University 45: 15–19. Google Scholar


    Nakano, T. 2010. A new species of the genus Orobdella (Hirudinida: Arhynchobdellida: Gastrostomobdellidae) from Kumamoto, Japan, and a redescription of O. whitmani with the designation of the lectotype. Zoological Science 27: 880–887. Google Scholar


    Nakano, T. 2012. A new species of Orobdella (Hirudinida, Arhynchobdellida, Gastrostomobdellidae) and redescription of O. kawakatsuorum from Hokkaido, Japan with the phylogenetic position of the new species. ZooKeys 169: 9–30. Google Scholar


    Nakano, T. 2016. A new quadrannulate species of Orobdella (Hirudinida, Arhynchobdellida, Orobdellidae) from western Honshu, Japan. ZooKeys 553: 33–51. Google Scholar


    Nakano, T., & T. Itoh. 2011. A list of the leech (Clitellata: Hirudinida) collection deposited in the Department of Zoology, The University Museum, The University of Tokyo. The University Museum, The University of Tokyo, Material Reports 90: 85–94. Google Scholar


    Nakano, T., & Y.-T. Lai. 2016. First record of Poecilobdella nanjingensis (Hirudinida: Arhynchobdellida: Hirudinidae) from Taiwan and its molecular phylogenetic position within the family. Species Diversity 21: 127–134. Google Scholar


    Nguyen, L. T., H. A. Schmidt, A. von Haeseler, & B. Q. Minh. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32: 268–274. Google Scholar


    Oceguera-Figueroa, A. 2012. Molecular phylogeny of the New World bloodfeeding leeches of the genus Haementeria and reconsideration of the biannulate genus Oligobdella. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 62: 508–514. Google Scholar


    Oka, A. 1925a. Notices sur les Hirudinées d'Extreme Orient, I–IV. Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses 10: 311–326. Google Scholar


    Oka, A. 1925b. Notices sur les Hirudinées d'Extrême Orient, V–VII. Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses 10: 327–335. Google Scholar


    Oka, A. 1935. Description d'un nouveau genre d'Hirudinée de la famille des Glossiphonides, Oligoclepsis tukubana n. g. n. sp. Proceedings of the Imperial Academy 11: 66–68. Google Scholar


    Rambaut, A., A. J. Drummond, D. Xie, G. Baele, & M. A. Suchard. 2018. Posterior Summarization in Bayesian Phylogenetics Using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67: 901–904. Google Scholar


    Ronquist, F., M. Teslenko, P. van der Mark, D. L. Ayres, A. Darling, S. Höhna, B. Larget, L. Liu, M. A. Suchard, & J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice Across a Large Model Space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. Google Scholar


    Sasaki, A. 2019. Three species of the genus Torix parasitic on amphibians. Amphibian History 32: 7–9. [In Japanese] Google Scholar


    Sawyer, R. T. 1986. Leech Biology and Behaviour. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1065 pp. Google Scholar


    Siddall, M. E., R. B. Budinoff, & E. Borda. 2005. Phylogenetic evaluation of systematics and biogeography of the leech family Glossiphoniidae. Invertebrate Systematics 19: 105–112. Google Scholar


    Sket, B., & P. Trontelj. 2008. Global diversity of leeches (Hirudinea) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 129–137. Google Scholar


    Soós, Á. 1969. Identification key to the leech (Hirudinoidea) genera of the world, with a catalogue of the species. VI. Family: Glossiphoniidae. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 15: 397–454. Google Scholar


    Stschegolew, G. G. 1922. Eine neue Egelart aus dem Baikalsee. Russkii gidrobiologicheskii zhurnal 1: 136–142. Google Scholar


    Tanaka, S., Y. Taguchi, A. Noda, N. Nonoue, & M. Asakawa. 2017. Hemiclepsis marginata (Hirudinida: Glossiphoniidae) obtained from breeding Japanese giant salamanders (Andrias japonicus) in a zoological garden. Journal of Rakuno Gakuen University Natural Science 41: 153–154. [In Japanese] Google Scholar


    Yamauchi, T., H. Yoshigou & T. Itoh. 2013. Occurrence of Parabdella quadrioculata (Annelida: Hirudinida: Glossiphoniidae) in Japan, with a first case of human infestation by the leech. Comparative Parasitology 80: 134–135. Google Scholar


    Yang, T. 1996. Fauna Sinica. Annelida Hirudinea. Science Press, Beijing, 261 pp. [In Chinese] Google Scholar


    Yoshida, K. 2009. Occurrence record of Torix tukubana (Annelida: Hirudinea: Rhynchobdellida) collected from Mt. Tenzan (Kyuragimachi, Karatsu-shi, Saga Prefecture). Saga Nature Study 15: 47. [In Japanese] Google Scholar
    Chiaki Kambayashi, Atsushi Kurabayashi, and Takafumi Nakano "Topotype-based redescription of the leech Torix tukubana (Hirudinida: Glossiphoniiformes: Glossiphoniidae)," Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 133(1), 59-71, (11 August 2020).
    Published: 11 August 2020
    13 PAGES

    Back to Top