How to translate text using browser tools
1 September 2018 Forum: Social-Ecological System Archetypes for European Rangelands
Tibor Hartel, Nora Fagerholm, Mario Torralba, Ágnes Balázsi, Tobias Plieninger
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Rangelands in Europe are imprinted by livestock production and embedded in mosaic landscapes of grasslands, croplands, woodlands, and settlements. They developed as social-ecological systems: People managed rangelands in order to maintain or enhance their ecosystem services, which in turn supported their well-being. The appreciation of ecosystem services provided by rangelands depends on the broad, socioeconomic aspirations and abilities of the managers and the capital available to achieve these aspirations. Here we propose four archetypical social-ecological system representations for European rangelands along the dimensions of socioeconomic aspirations (i.e., oriented toward conventional or sustainable production) and available financial capital (i.e., low or high) to employ farming technologies on rangelands. The four archetypes are aspiration misfit, pockets of sustainability, techno-dependence, and money dependent sustainability. We describe the landscape physiognomy, ecosystem service appreciation, and management-related synergies and trade-offs in ecosystem services supply related to each archetype and formulate a number of research questions to document and further understand them as social-ecological systems. We include the importance of urbanization, land grabbing, and institutional networks in shaping the social-ecological archetypes of rangelands and the relationship between our social-ecological archetypes and the resilience and transformability of rangelands.

© 2018 The Society for Range Management. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Tibor Hartel, Nora Fagerholm, Mario Torralba, Ágnes Balázsi, and Tobias Plieninger "Forum: Social-Ecological System Archetypes for European Rangelands ," Rangeland Ecology and Management 71(5), 536-544, (1 September 2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2018.03.006
Received: 18 February 2017; Accepted: 15 March 2018; Published: 1 September 2018
KEYWORDS
Agricultural landscape
ecosystem services
silvopastoralism
sustainability
wood-pasture
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top