The publisher regrets that the keywords and last paragraph of the Introduction contained errors. The corrected keywords and Introduction are shown below.
Keywords: Monitoring, Collaborative adaptive management, Brush management, Ecological sites, State transition models Last paragraph of the Introduction should read:
In this article, we argue that collaborative science at the landscape scale, supported by developing technologies and stable funding, can mobilize science to improve conservation practice effectiveness. We briefly review the history of science's role in rangeland conservation to provide a background. Then we introduce the Restore New Mexico (RNM) Collaborative Monitoring Program in which we have been applying collaborative science, involving 6 million acres of the Chihuahuan Desert of southwestern New Mexico, for the past 10 years. We review steps we have used in the collaborative science process and how we are applying them in the RNM program. Our ideas presented here draw from and parallel those of an increasingly rich body of collaborative science examples.3–6
The publisher would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.