Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 January 2020 Review of the Himalayan genus Hingstoniella Jeannel, and description of Besuchetaceus gen. n. from Nepal (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae)
Zi-Wei Yin, Li-Zhen Li
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The Himalayan genus Hingstoniella Jeannel and its type species H. lata Jeannel are redescribed, and a new species, H. trigona sp. n., is described. Besuchetaceus gen. n. is established for a single species, B. nepalensis sp. n., from central Nepal. Both genera together with Sinotrisus Yin & Li are placed in the newly designated ‘Hingstoniella group’. Keys are provided to distinguish genera of Hingstoniella group and species of Hingstoniella, and the major diagnostic features of all included taxa are illustrated.

INTRODUCTION

In his study of the northern Indian Pselaphinae, Jeannel (1960) created Hingstoniella Jeannel for a new species, H. lata Jeannel, on the basis of one male from Sikkim and one female from Yatung, Tibet (= Yadong, Xizang A. R.). Jeannel stated (1960: 410) that Hingstoniella was ‘of uncertain affinity, but however appearing to be well related to Indo-Malaysian lineages’. Based on the additional material from Tibet, Yin et al. (2011) redescribed the genus and species, and reported its association with the ant genus Myrmica Latreille. The discovery and a subsequent revision (Yin et al., 2010, 2012) of the genus Sinotrisus Yin & Li, with four species scattered in China and Vietnam, seemed to shed some light on the uncertain relationship of Hingstoniella in Batrisina. Despite the quite different shape of the pronotum, both genera share a modified vertex in male, and a considerably constricted base of the aedeagus – a type of aedeagus that is unique in Batrisitae, which is considered to be a possible synapomorphy of these two genera.

As part of our on-going study of the on loan MHNG material, in this paper we redescribe Hingstoniella and H. lata, document many new locality records for the type species in Nepal and neighboring area, and describe a new species, H. trigona sp. n., also from Nepal. In addition, a new genus and species, Besuchetaceus nepalensis gen. et sp. n., is described from Nepal. Since Besuchetaceus shares with Hingstoniella and Sinotrisus the modified male vertex and the unique type of aedeagus, these taxa are placed into a small group of genera here termed the ‘Hingstoniella group’. Identification keys to genera of Hingstoniella group as well as to species of Hingstoniella are provided, and diagnostic features of all included taxa are illustrated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Material used in this paper are housed in the following public institutions:

MHNG Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle, Geneva, Switzerland (Giulio Cuccodoro)

SNUC Insect Collection of the Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China (Zi-Wei Yin)

The collection data of the material are quoted verbatim. A slash (/) is used to separate different labels, authors' notes are included in square brackets ([]). The terminology follows Chandler (2001), except we use ‘ventrite’ instead of ‘sternite’ when describing meso- and metathoracic structures; the terms ‘tergite’ and ‘sternite’ are used when referring to abdominal segments.

The following abbreviations are applied: AL - length of the abdomen along the midline; AW - maximum width of the abdomen; EL - length of the elytra along the sutural line; EW - maximum width of the elytra; HL - length of the head from the anterior clypeal margin to the occipital constriction; HW - width of the head across eyes; PL - length of the pronotum along the midline; PW - maximum width of the pronotum. The total body length is a combination of HL + PL + EL + AL.

TAXONOMY

Hingstoniella group of genera

  • Definition: Members of the Hingstoniella group have a more-or-less-developed modified vertex in the male, and share a strongly constricted base of the aedeagus, this type of aedeagus seems to be unique in Batrisitae.

  • Included taxa: Hingstoniella, Sinotrisus, and Besuchetaceus gen. n.

  • Hingstoniella Jeannel, 1960 Figs 1-3

  • Hingstoniella Jeannel, 1960: 410. Type species: Hingstoniella lata Jeannel (original monotypy).

  • Hingstoniella: Newton & Chandler, 1989: 37 (catalog); Yin, Li & Zhao, 2011: 390 (diagnosis, redescription, illustrations).

  • Diagnosis: Head triangular; frontal rostrum low; with punctiform vertexal foveae; antennomeres XI elongate and conical. Pronotum transversely octagonal, with only punctiform lateral antebasal foveae; lacking antebasal spines. Elytra each with one large basal fovea and shallow discal stria. Abdomen with lateral margins of tergite IV edged by marginal carinae; tergite IV longest.

  • Redescription: General body form robust; Length 3.09-3.56 mm. Head triangular (Fig. 1A); with low frontal rostrum, antennal tubercles low; vertexal foveae small and punctiform, connected by indistinct U-shaped vertexal sulcus; antennae with 11 antennomeres, clubs formed by apical three antennomeres, antennomeres XI elongate and conical; ocular-mandibular carinae faint; eyes reniform (Fig. 1B); maxillary palpi with palpomeres III transverse and triangular, IV fusiform; with gular foveae merged into single opening (Fig. 1C). Pronotum (Fig. 1D) transversely octagonal; lateral antebasal foveae punctiform, lacking median antebasal fovea and antebasal spines; disc only slightly convex; lacking basolateral foveae; lacking paranotal carinae; lateral procoxal foveae (Fig. 1E) present. Each elytron (Fig. 1F) with one large basal fovea, discal striae shallow, sutural striae complete; lacking subhumeral foveae, marginal stria present from basal one-fourth toward posterior margin; lateroapical notch indistinct. Thorax (Fig. 2A) with small median and lateral mesoventral foveae; with lateral mesocoxal foveae; prepectal foveae present; lateral metaventral foveae punctiform, metacoxae narrowly separated; posterior margin with narrow median notch. Abdomen (Fig. 2B-D) has tergites IV-VI (first to third visible tergites) with marginal carinae extending through tergal length; tergite IV longest, V-VII slightly shorter and subequal in length; tergite IV with basolateral foveae at lateral ends of sulcus, lacking mediobasal foveae and discal carinae, V-VII each with one pair of basolateral foveae. Sternite IV (second visible ventrite) twice length of V at midlength, with one pair of mediobasal foveae and three pairs of basolateral foveae, lacking basal sulcus, V-VII lacking foveae. Legs short, second and third tarsomeres subequal in length.

  • Male (Fig. 3A-B) with vertex modified. Aedeagus with paramere fused to median lobe to form elongate ventral lobe; articulated dorsal lobe present; basal capsule with strongly constricted base.

  • Key to genera of Hingstoniella group

    1 General form stouter (Fig. 3); pronotum distinctly transverse (Figs 1D, 1E, 3); each elytron with one basal fovea (Fig. 1F) Hingstoniella Jeannel

    – General form slenderer (Yin et al., 2010: fig. 2; Yin et al., 2012: figs 1, 4; Fig. 10); pronotum slightly transverse to slightly longer than wide; each elytron with three basal foveae (Yin et al., 2012: figs 2A, 3A, 5A, 6A; Figs 8F, 10) 2

    2 Pronotum less transverse, lateral margins lacking spines or denticles (Yin et al., 2012: figs 2A, 3A, 5A, 6A); deep basal sulcus of tergite IV interrupted by discal carinae or ridges (Yin et al., 2012: figs 1, 4) Sinotrisus Yin & Li

    – Pronotum more transverse, lateral margins spinose or dentate (Fig. 8D); basal sulcus of tergite IV shallow, lacking discal carinae or ridges (Figs 9C, 10) Besuchetaceus gen. n.

    Key to males of Hingstoniella

  • 1 Vertexal modification composed of indistinct punctiform protuberance (Fig. 4A); each eye with more than 60 facets; protibiae with mesal margins angularly expanded near apex (Fig. 4C). Distribution: Nepal, Tibet, northern India (Fig. 12) H. lata Jeannel

  • – Vertexal modification composed of distinct triangular bump (Fig. 7A); each eye with about 40 facets; protibiae with mesal margins less expanded (Fig. 7C). Distribution: Nepal (Fig. 12) H. trigona sp. n.

  • Comparative notes: The genus up on which the Hingstoniella group is based. Members of the group share a modified vertex in the male, and a strongly constricted base of the aedeagal basal capsule. Hingstoniella can be quickly separated from Sinotrisus and Besuchetaceus gen. n. by the transversely octagonal pronotum, and each elytron with single basal fovea, while both latter genera have the pronotum slightly transverse or slightly longer than wide, and have three basal foveae on each elytron.

  • Fig. 1.

    Morphology of Hingstoniella. (A) Head, in dorsal view. (B) Same, in lateral view. (C) Same, in ventral view. (D) Pronotum. (E) Prosternite. (F) Left elytron. Abbreviations: bef - basal elytral fovea; ds - discal striae; gf - gular foveae; laf - lateral antebasal foveae; lpcf - lateral procoxal foveae; mls - median longitudinal sulcus; ss - sutural striae; vf - vertexal foveae. Scales: 0.2 mm.

    f01_165.jpg

    Fig. 2.

    Morphology of Hingstoniella. (A) Meso- and metaventrite. (B) Abdomen, in lateral view. (C) Same, in dorsal view. (D) Same, in ventral view. Abbreviations: blf - basolateral foveae; bs - basal sulcus; lmcf - lateral mesocoxal foveae; lmsf - lateral mesoventral foveae; lmtf - lateral metaventral foveae; mbf - mediobasal foveae; mmsf - median mesoventral foveae; ppf - prepectal foveae. Scales: 0.5 mm.

    f02_165.jpg

    Hingstoniella lata Jeannel, 1960 Figs 3A, 4-6, 12

  • Hingstoniella lata Jeannel, 1960: 410. Type locality: Sikkim, Lachen, alt. 3000 m.

  • Hingstoniella lata.Yin et al., 2011: 395 (description, new locality, host record).

  • Material examined: (23 ♂♂, 23 ♀♀). CHINA (in SNUC): 3 ♂♂, 1 ♀, labeled ‘China: Xizang A. R., Neilamu Co., Quxiang (曲乡), alt. 3300 m, nest of Myrmica sp. under rock, 20.vii.2010, Wen-Xuan Bi leg. [1 ex Myrmica each pinned under two males]’. – 1 ♂, 1 ♀, labeled ‘China: Xizang A. R., Yadong Co., Xiayadong (下亚东), alt., 3400 m, nest of Myrmica sp. under rock, 9.viii.2010, Wen-Xuan Bi leg. [1 ex Myrmica pinned under a male]’. – 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀, same locality, except 8.viii.2010, 2800 m [1 ex Myrmica pinned under a male]’. – NEPAL (in MHNG): 1 ♂, labeled ‘Thodung via, Those 3100 m, 29.-31.5.1976 / Nepal, W. Wittmer, C. Baroni Urbani / comparé au type / Hingstoniella lata Jeann. Cl. Besuchet dét. XII. 1977’. – 1 ♀, labeled ‘Pokhara 820 m, 15.-18.6.1976 / Nepal, W. Wittmer, C. Baroni Urbani / Hingstoniella lata Jeann. Cl. Besuchet dét. XII. 1977’. – 1 ♂, labeled ‘NEPAL (Pro. Bagmati), Ridge betw. Mere Dara and Thare Pati, 3500 m, Löbl & Smetana, 9.IV.81 [2 ex. Myrmica pinned under specimen]’. – 1 ♂, labeled ‘Umg, Alm Dugdinma, b. Lughla, 3000-4000 m, Khumbu, Nepal, lg. Franz [Pa263, overleaf] / Hingstoniella, det. D. S. Chandler’. – 5 ♀♀ [on three pins, each pin also with 2x Myrmica], labeled ‘NEPAL (Prov. Bagmati), below Jangtang Ridge, NE Barahbise, 3150 m, Löbl & Smetana, 4.V.81 / Hingstoniella’. – 1 ♀, labeled ‘NEPAL, Khumbu, Periche 4350 m, 29.vi.1963, leg. G. Ebert’. – 1 ♀, labeled ‘NEPAL: Bagmati, Pokhare NE Barahbise, 2800 m, 3.5.81, Löbl - Smetana’. – 3 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀, labeled ‘NEPAL, 9.x.84, Gairi, L. Deharveng’ [according to pers. comm. with L. Deharveng, detail collection data of this material is as following: ‘Nepal: Trekking of Namche Bazar from le Tomba-Kosi: Massif of Hanumante Danda above Jiri. Lieu-dit Gairi, 09/10/84, forest, litter, by hand, Louis Deharveng leg (NEP84-04)’]. – 1 ♀, labeled ‘Gufa-Gorza, 2800-2100 m, 4.VI.1985 / E-Nepal, Koshi, M. Brancucci’. – 1 ♀, labeled ‘E-NEPAL, Dhankuta, Arun Valley, SE des Makalu, Tashigaon, 13.-14.6.1980, leg. C. Holzschuh, 2100 m / 195’. – 3 ♂♂, labeled ‘E Nepal, Koshi, Chauki, 2700 m, Holzschuh, 2.vi.85’ [1 ex Myrmica each pinned under 2 males, 2 ex Myrmica under the other male]. – 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀, labeled ‘“Bakan” W of Tashigaon 3200 m, 6.IV.1982, A. & Z. Smetana / NEPAL, Khandbari District’ [1 ex Myrmica each pinned under a male and a female]. – INDIA (in MHNG): 4 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀, labeled ‘INDIA: Darjeeling distr., Tongli, 3100 m, 16.x.1978, I, Löbl, Bes., nr. 16a, under stones’ [1 ex Myrmica each pinned under two males and one female]. – 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀, labeled ‘INDIA - West Bengal Distr. Darjeeling, Tonglu, 16.X.78, Besuchet- Löbl’.

  • Each of the above specimens bears an identification label as ‘Hingstoniella lata Jeannel, 1960, det. Yin & Li, 2014’.

  • Description: Male (Fig. 3A). BL 3.20-3.41 mm. Body reddish brown; most part of dorsal surface densely hairy.

  • Head (Fig. 4A) distinctly transverse, HL 0.55-0.59 mm, HW 0.74-0.84 mm; vertex slightly convex, modification composed of indistinct punctiform protuberance, foveae located below level of posterior margins of eyes; each eye with about 65 small facets; antennal clubs formed by apical three enlarged antennomeres (Fig. 4B). Pronotum transversely octagonal, PL 0.65-0.74 mm, PW 1.02-1.09 mm, median longitudinal sulcus weakly developed. Elytra wider than long, EL 1.02-1.03 mm, EW 1.28-1.31 mm; shallow discal striae extending to 3/4 of elytral length. Metathoracic wings fully developed. Protibiae (Fig. 4C) triangularly projected at mesal margins near apices; mesotrochanters (Fig. 4D) with small protuberance at ventral margin; metatrochanters (Fig. 4E) with ventral margin protruding to form strong projection. Abdomen wider than long, AL 0.98-1.05 mm, AW 1.17-1.20 mm. Aedeagus (Fig. 4F-I) asymmetric, length 0.49-0.52 mm. Female. Similar to male in general appearance, protibiae, mesotrochanters, and metatrochanters lacking protuberance or projection. Each eye with about 45 facets. Tergite VIII (Fig. 4J) and sternite VIII (Fig. 4K) transverse. Genital complex (Fig. 4L) transverse, width 0.37 mm. Measurements: BL 3.09-3.29 mm, HL 0.52-0.55 mm, HW 0.75-0.81 mm, PL 0.66-0.72 mm, PW 1.06-1.08 mm, EL 0.93-1.00 mm, EW 1.06-1.20 mm, AL 0.98-1.02 mm, AW 1.15-1.17 mm.

  • Differential diagnosis: Hingstoniella lata can be separated from H. trigona sp. n. described below only by the male vertexal modification with an indistinct punctiform protuberance; in contrast, the male of H. trigona has the vertexal modification represented by a much larger, triangular bump.

  • Intraspecific variation: While the male vertexal modification and other characters on legs are stable, the form of aedeagus of populations from different localities vary distinctly, especially the dorsal lobe in axial view. When available, at least one male from each locality was dissected to illustrate the intraspecific variation (Figs 4F-I, 5, 6).

  • Biology: Adults of this species were frequently collected from nests of Myrmica ants nesting under rocks.

  • Distribution: Nepal: Gandaki, Bagmati, Janakpur, Sagarmatha, Koshi; India: Sikkim, West Bengal; China: Xizang (Fig. 12).

  • Hingstoniella trigona sp. n. Figs 3B, 7, 12

  • Holotype: Holotype ♂, NEPAL: labeled ‘Taksanggeb., b. Tukche, Takola [Pa327-327a, overleaf] / Zentral-Nepal, Sept.-Okt. 1971, lg. H. Franz / n. sp. / HOLOTYPE [red], ♂, Hingstoniella trigona sp. n., det. Yin & Li, 2014, MHNG’; in MHNG, without accession number.

  • Paratypes: NEPAL, 1 ♂, labeled ‘NEPAL, Kali Gandaki, vall., Nilgiri Himal. upp., Titigaon vill., 3000-3200 m NN, 21.V.2002, leg. J. Schmidt’. – 1 ♀, labeled ‘NEPAL, Annapurna Reg., Umg. Ghorepani, 2800 m, 28°24′15″N, 83°42′01″E, 22.IV.2000, leg. A. Weigel’. – 1 ♀, labeled ‘Zentral - Nepal, Annapurna - SW, 16.4.82, 4500 m, Baum / COLL. PANKOW [1 ex Myrmica pinned under specimen]’; in MHNG, without accession number. Each paratype bears a type label similar to that of holotype except ‘Paratype [yellow], ♂ [or ♀]’.

  • Description: Male (Fig. 3B). BL 3.36-3.44 mm. Body reddish brown; most part of dorsal surface densely hairy.

  • Head (Fig. 7A) distinctly transverse, HL 0.58-0.60 mm, HW 0.85-0.86 mm; vertex slightly convex, modification composed of distinct triangular bump, foveae located below level of posterior margins of eyes; each eye with about 40 small facets; antennal clubs formed by apical three enlarged antennomeres (Fig. 7B). Pronotum transversely octagonal, PL 0.70-0.73 mm, PW 1.04-1.06 mm, median longitudinal sulcus moderately developed. Elytra wider than long, EL 1.02-1.04 mm, EW 1.26-1.30 mm; shallow discal striae extending to half of elytral length. Metathoracic wings fully developed. Protibiae (Fig. 7C) slightly projected at mesal margins near apices; mesotrochanters (Fig. 7D) with small denticle at ventral margin; metatrochanters (Fig. 7E) with ventral margin protruding to form long projection. Abdomen wider than long, AL 1.04-1.09 mm, AW 1.17-1.18 mm. Aedeagus (Fig. 7F-I) asymmetric, length 0.50-0.51 mm.

  • Female. Similar to male in general appearance, protibiae, mesotrochanters, and metatrochanters lacking protuberance or projection. Each eye with about 35 facets. Tergite VIII (Fig. 7J) and sternite VIII (Fig. 7K) transverse. Genital complex (Fig. 7L) transverse, width 0.40 mm. Measurements: BL 3.48-3.56 mm, HL 0.58-0.59 mm, HW 0.87-0.88 mm, PL 0.76-0.77 mm, PW 1.14-1.15 mm, EL 1.03-1.07 mm, EW 1.33-1.35 mm, AL 1.07-1.17 mm, AW 1.20-1.26 mm.

  • Differential diagnosis: The new species can be separated from H. lata by the male possessing a different form of the vertexal modification, as well as the less projected apical portion of the protibiae, and the longer ventral projection of the metatrochanters.

  • Biology: One Myrmica ant is pinned under the female paratype from Annapurna, indicating that the new species probably represents a similar myrmecophily as H. lata.

  • Distribution: Nepal: Daulagiri (Fig. 12).

  • Fig. 3.

    Habitus of Hingstoniella. (A) H. lata. (B) H. trigona Scales: 0.5 mm.

    f03_165.jpg

    Fig. 4.

    Diagnostic characters of Hingstoniella lata (A-I Male, J-L Female.). (A) Head and pronotum. (B) Antenna. (C) Apical portion of protibia. (D) Mesotrochanter. (E) Metatrochanter. (F) Aedeagus of population from Xiayadong, Tibet, in axial view. (G) Same, in dorsal view. (H) Same, in lateral view. (I) Same, in ventral view. (J) Tergite VIII. (K) Sternite VIII. (L) Genital complex. Scales: A, B = 0.5 mm; F-L = 0.2 mm; C-E = 0.1 mm.

    f04_165.jpg

    Fig. 5.

    Aedeagus of Hingstoniella lata in populations from various localities (A, E, I, M Dorsal view. B, F, J, N Lateral view. C, G, K, O Ventral view. D, H, L, P Axial view.). (A-D) Population from Tonglu, Darjeeling, India. (E-H) Population from “Bakan” W of Tashigaon, Nepal. (I-L) Population from Lughla, Khumbu, Nepal. (M-P) Population from Gairi, Nepal. Scales: 0.2 mm.

    f05_165.jpg

    Fig. 6.

    Aedeagus of Hingstoniella lata in populations from various localities (A, E, I Dorsal view. B, F, J Lateral view. C, G, K Ventral view. D, H, L Axial view.). (A-D) Population from Thodung via Those. (E-H) Population from Quxiang, Tibet. (I-L) Population from Ridge between Mere Dara and Thare Pati, Nepal. Scales: 0.2 mm.

    f06_165.jpg

    Fig. 7.

    Diagnostic characters of Hingstoniella trigona (A-I Male. J-L Female.). (A) Head and pronotum. (B) Antenna. (C) Apical portion of protibia. (D) Mesotrochanter. (E) Metatrochanter. (F) Aedeagus, in axial view. (G) Same, in dorsal view. (H) Same, in lateral view. (I) Same, in ventral view. (J) Tergite VIII. (K) Sternite VIII. (L) Genital complex. Scales: A, B = 0.5 mm; F-L = 0.2 mm; C-E = 0.1 mm.

    f07_165.jpg

    Besuchetaceus gen. n. Figs 8-9

  • Type species: Besuchetaceus nepalensis sp. n.

  • Diagnosis: Head nearly triangular; frontal rostrum low; with distinct vertexal foveae; antennomeres XI elongate and conical. Pronotum transverse, with big lateral antebasal foveae; antebasal spines present; lateral margins spinose. Each elytron with three basal foveae, shallow and short discal striae present. Abdomen with lateral margins of tergite IV edged by marginal carinae; tergite IV longest.

  • Description: General body form elongate; Length 3.74-3.93 mm. Head nearly triangular (Fig. 8A); with low frontal rostrum, antennal tubercles slightly prominent; large vertexal foveae connected by broad U-shaped vertexal sulcus; antennae with 11 antennomeres, clubs loosely formed by apical three antennomeres, antennomeres XI elongate and conical; ocular-mandibular carinae distinct; eyes reniform (Fig. 8B); maxillary palpi with palpomeres III transverse and triangular, IV fusiform; with gular foveae merged into single opening (Fig. 8C). Pronotum (Fig. 8D) transverse; lateral antebasal foveae distinct, lateral margins spinose, lacking median antebasal fovea, with median and lateral longitudinal sulci, antebasal spines present; disc moderately convex; lacking basolateral foveae; lacking paranotal carinae; lateral procoxal foveae (Fig. 8E) present. Each elytron (Fig. 8F) with three distinct basal foveae, discal striae short and shallow, sutural striae complete; with subhumeral foveae, marginal stria present from fovea toward posterior margin; lateroapical notch small. Thorax (Fig. 9A) with small median and lateral mesoventral foveae; with lateral mesocoxal foveae; lacking prepectal foveae; lateral metaventral foveae small, metacoxae narrowly separated; posterior margin with narrow median notch. Abdomen (Fig. 9B-D) with tergites IV (first visible tergite), V, and VII bearing marginal carinae extending through whole tergal length; tergite IV longest, V-VII successively shorter; tergite IV with basolateral foveae at lateral ends of sulcus, lacking mediobasal foveae and discal carinae, V-VII each with one pair of basolateral foveae. Sternite IV (second visible ventrite) twice length of V at midlength, with one pair of mediobasal foveae and three pairs of basolateral foveae, basal sulcus between each mediobasal fovea and first pair of basolateral fovea, sternites V-VII lacking fovea. Legs slender, second and third tarsomeres subequal in length.

  • Male with vertex modified. Aedeagus with paramere fused to median lobe to form elongate ventral lobe; articulated dorsal lobe present; basal capsule with strongly constricted base.

  • Comparative notes: This new genus is placed as a member of the Hingstoniella group by the shared modified male vertex and the unique type of aedeagus. Besuchetaceus is most close to Sinotrisus by the similar general appearance, and each elytron possessing three basal foveae. The two genera can be separated by the spinose pronotal lateral margins, the shallow, complete basal sulcus, and the lack of discal carinae on tergite IV in Besuchetaceus, and the pronotum is generally more transverse. Sinotrisus has the pronotal lateral margins lacking spines or denticles, the pronotum is much less transverse, and tergite VI bears a deep basal sulcus interrupted by discal carinae or ridges. Besuchetaceus can be separated from Hingstoniella by the less robust habitus, the quite different shape of the pronotum, and the presence of three basal foveae on each elytron.

  • Etymology: The new genus is named after Claude Besuchet (Geneva, Switzerland), who firstly recognized this as a new genus placed near Hingstoniella, and added an identification label. Gender is masculine.

  • Besuchetaceus nepalensis sp. n. Figs 10-12

  • Holotype: ♂, NEPAL: labeled ‘Ost-Nepal, Rolwaling Himal / oberh. Simigaon, 2700-2800 m, 31.05.2000, leg. A. Kleeberg / gen. n. aff. Hingstoniella, Cl. Besuchet dét 2005 / HOLOTYPE [red], ♂, Besuchetaceus nepalensis sp. n., det. Yin & Li, 2014, MHNG’; in MHNG, without accession number.

  • Paratype: 1 ♀, labeled ‘Zentral-Nepal, Sept.-Okt. 1971, lg. H. Franz [Pa160, overleaf; according to Franz's dairy, the detailed collection data related to this number is: Thare-Pati, low Rhododendron-Juniperus forest, 8.10.1971, small sifting sample from litter, moss and humus (Schillhammer, per. comm.)] / Tare-Pati / PARATYPE [yellow], ♀, Besuchetaceus nepalensis sp. n., det. Yin & Li, 2014, MHNG’; in MHNG, without accession number.

  • Description: Male (Fig. 10A). BL 3.93 mm. Body reddish brown; most part of dorsal surface densely hairy.

  • Head (Fig. 11A) transverse, HL 0.69 mm, HW 0.79 mm; vertex convex at middle, modification composed of triangular bump covered with dense setae, foveae below level of posterior margins of eyes; each eye with about 60 small facets; antennal clubs formed by apical three enlarged antennomeres (Fig. 11B). Pronotum transverse, PL 0.76 mm, PW 0.93 mm, median longitudinal sulcus deep, lateral longitudinal sulci less developed. Elytra wider than long, EL 1.22 mm, EW 1.42 mm; shallow discal striae extending to basal 1/4 of elytral length. Metathoracic wings fully developed. Protibiae simple; mesotrochanters (Fig. 11C) with small, sharp spine at ventral margin, mesotibiae (Fig. 11D) with small apical spine; metatrochanters (Fig. 11E) with ventral margin protruding to form broad projection. Abdomen wider than long, AL 1.26 mm, AW 1.28 mm. Aedeagus (Fig. 11F-I) asymmetric, length 0.50 mm.

  • Female (Fig. 10B). Similar to male in general appearance, mesotrochanters, mesotibiae, and metatrochanters lacking protuberance or projection. Each eye with about 45 facets. Tergite VIII (Fig. 11J) and sternite VIII (Fig. 11K) transverse. Genital complex (Fig. 11L) transverse, width 0.45 mm. Measurements: BL 3.74 mm, HL 0.63 mm, HW 0.74 mm, PL 0.65 mm, PW 0.84 mm, EL 1.11 mm, EW 1.44 mm, AL 1.35 mm, AW 1.31 mm.

  • Differential diagnosis: Same as the genus, when combined with the form of the male modified vertex and leg characters, Besuchetaceus nepalensis can be readily separated from all other batrisine species.

  • Biology: The female paratype was sifted from a litter, moss and humus sample in a low Rhododendron-Juniperus forest on 10th October.

  • Distribution: Nepal: Bagmati, Janakpur (Fig. 12).

  • Etymology: The specific epithet refers to Nepal, the country where the type locality of the new species lies.

  • Fig. 8.

    Morphology of Besuchetaceus. (A) Head, in dorsal view. (B) Same, in lateral view. (C) Same, in ventral view. (D) Pronotum. (E) Prosternite. (F) Left elytron. Abbreviations: abs - antebasal spine; bef - basal elytral fovea; ds - discal striae; gc - gular carina; gf - gular foveae; laf - lateral antebasal foveae; lls - lateral longitudinal sulci; lpcf - lateral procoxal fovea; mls - median longitudinal sulcus; ms - marginal stria; omc - ocular-mandibular carinae; shef - subhumeral elytral foveae; ss - sutural striae; vf - vertexal foveae. Scales: 0.2 mm.

    f08_165.jpg

    Fig. 9.

    Morphology of Besuchetaceus. (A) Meso- and metaventrite. (B) Abdomen, in lateral view. (C) Same, in dorsal view. (D) Same, in ventral view. Abbreviations: blf - basolateral foveae; bs - basal sulcus; lmcf - lateral mesocoxal foveae; lmsf - lateral mesoventral foveae; lmtf - lateral metaventral foveae; mbf - mediobasal foveae; mmsf - median mesoventral foveae. Scales: 0.5 mm.

    f09_165.jpg

    Fig. 10.

    Habitus of Besuchetaceus nepalensis. (A) Male. (B) Female. Scales: 1.0 mm.

    f10_165.jpg

    Fig. 11.

    Diagnostic characters of Besuchetaceus nepalensis (A-I Male, J-L Female.). (A) Head and pronotum. (B) Antenna. (C) Mesotrochanter. (D) Apical portion of mesotibia. (E) Metatrochanter. (F) Aedeagus, in axial view. (G) Same, in dorsal view. (H) Same, in lateral view. (I) Same, in ventral view. (J) Tergite VIII. (K) Sternite VIII. (L) Genital complex. Scales: A, B = 0.5 mm; F-L = 0.2 mm; C-E = 0.1 mm.

    f11_165.jpg

    Fig. 12.

    Distribution of Hingstoniella lata, H. trigona, and Besuchetaceus nepalensis. Abbreviation: TL - type locality.

    f12_165.jpg

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    We thank Giulio Cuccodoro for the loan of material. Louis Deharveng (Paris, France) provided detailed collection data for the material he collected in Nepal. Harald Schillhammer (Vienna, Austria) helped to locate Franz's diary and provided related collection data. Giorgio Sabella (Sicily, Italy) and Peter Hlaváč (Praha, Czech Republic) read a previous version of the manuscript and provided constrictive criticisms. The present study was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (No. 31172134) and Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (No. 15YF1408700).

    REFERENCES

    1.

    Chandler D.S. 2001. Biology, morphology, and systematics of the ant-like litter beetles of Australia (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae). Memoirs on Entomology International 15: 1–560. Google Scholar

    2.

    Jeannel R. 1960. Sur les Psélaphides (Coleoptera) de l'Inde septentrionale. Bulletin of the British Museum (Entomology) 9: 403–456. Google Scholar

    3.

    Newton A.F. Jr, Chandler D.S. 1989. World catalog of the genera of Pselaphidae (Coleoptera). Fieldiana: Zoology, (N.S.) 53: iv + 1–93. Google Scholar

    4.

    Yin Z.W., Li L.Z., Zhao M.J. 2010. Contributions to the knowledge of the myrmecophilous pselaphines (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Pselaphinae) from China. III. Two new genera and two new species of the subtribe Batrisina (Staphylinidae, Pselaphinae, Batrisitae) from a colony of Lasius niger (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Formicinae) in East China. Sociobiology 55: 241–253. Google Scholar

    5.

    Yin Z.W., Li L.Z., Zhao M.J. 2011. Contributions to the knowledge of the myrmecophilous pselaphines (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Pselaphinae) from China. VI. Hingstoniella Jeannel is a myrmecophile, with notes on its definition and systematic position (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae). Sociobiology 57: 389–396. Google Scholar

    6.

    Yin Z.W., Nomura S., Li L.Z. 2012. A taxonomic revision of the genus Sinotrisus Yin & Li (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Pselaphinae). Zookeys 205: 45–57. Google Scholar
    Zi-Wei Yin and Li-Zhen Li "Review of the Himalayan genus Hingstoniella Jeannel, and description of Besuchetaceus gen. n. from Nepal (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae)," Revue suisse de Zoologie 122(1), 165-180, (1 January 2020). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14576
    Accepted: 17 November 2014; Published: 1 January 2020
    KEYWORDS
    Batrisitae
    Besuchetaceus
    Himalayan region
    Hingstoniella
    new genus
    new species
    Sinotrisus
    Back to Top