Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 January 2020 Ceratophysella macrocantha Stach, 1946 (Collembola, Hypogastruridae): a redescription of a forgotten species from the Alps
Dariusz Skarżyński
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Ceratophysella macrocanthaStach, 1946 is redescribed on the basis of a syntype specimen from the Austrian Alps which is here designated as the lectotype. This species has the chaetotaxy of the type B and an empodium with a long filament. It is closely related to nine species/forms, two of which, C. attenuataGisin, 1960 nec Cassagnau, 1959 from the Swiss Alps and C. rectaCassagnau, 1959 from the Pyrenees, are most similar.

INTRODUCTION

Ceratophysella Börner, 1932 is one of the most species-rich genera within the family Hypogastruridae. Unfortunately, some of the 138 species currently listed by Bellinger et al. (2019) are insufficiently known and there are doubts concerning their taxonomic status. One of these is Ceratophysella macrocantha Stach, 1946. This characteristic species, with a large body size and long anal spines, has been described by Stach (1946) on the basis of two specimens collected by Dr Herbert Franz in the Austrian Alps. This species has not been recorded ever since, and as a consequence our knowledge of its morphology is exclusively based on the original description. Unfortunately, Stach did not provide comprehensive information on chaetotaxy and some other morphological details, and therefore this species name, a possible synonym of Ceratophysella scotica (Carpenter & Evans, 1899), was not included in the most recent identification key of Palaearctic Hypogastruridae (Thibaud et al., 2004). An examination of the only syntype that remains in the collection of the Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, PAS, Cracow, Poland (according to Wanda M. Weiner the second syntype is lost) allowed to redescribe C. macrocantha, designate a lectotype and discuss the taxonomic position of this species.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The lectotype of C. macrocantha was cleared in Nesbitt's fluid (chloral hydrate, concentrated hydrochloric acid, distilled water), slide-mounted in a mixed medium (distilled water, gum arabic, glycerol, chloral hydrate), and studied using a Nikon Eclipse E600 phase contrast microscope. Figures were drawn using a camera lucida. Terminology in the description follows that given in Babenko et al. (1994) and Thibaud et al. (2004).

TAXONOMIC PART

Ceratophysella macrocantha Stach, 1946
Figs 1-8

  • Type material: Female lectotype, designated here, previously in alcohol, now mounted on permanent slide, deposited in the Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, PAS, Cracow, Poland; Styrian Alps, Buchau, east ridge, about 850 m asl., in beech forest on the south slope; 21 October 1941; leg. H. Franz.

  • Diagnosis: Body size large. Tegumental granulation fine and uniform. Chaetotaxy of the type B, setae p3 on abdominal tergum IV absent. Antennal segment IV with trilobed apical vesicle, 7 cylindrical sensilla and about 18 slightly modified sensilla in ventral field. Eversible sac between antennal segments III and IV weakly developed. Head of maxilla with lamella 1 protruding beyond the teeth and broadened at the tip. Outer maxillary lobe with two sublobal hairs. Empodial appendage with apical filament reaching tip of claw. Dens with 7 unmodified setae, mucro slender, spoon-like at tip, with low outer lamella. Anal spines long colourless.

  • Redescription: Body length 2.4 mm. Colour (in alcohol) mostly dark blue, ventrally paler. Tegumental granulation fine and uniform, 27 granules between widely spaced macrosetae p1 on abdominal tergum V (Fig. 6).

  • Arrangement of setae on head typical for the genus, spine-like setae absent. Dorsal chaetotaxy of type B (Figs 5-6). Thoracic tergum II with setae m3 and m4 present, setae a2 similar to a3. Setae p1 on abdominal tergum IV developed as macrosetae, p2 as microsetae, setae p3 absent, additional setae m2 present. Abdominal tergum V with long a-setae, setae p2 present. Differentiation of dorsal setae into micro- and macrosetae distinct. Setae long (ratio p5 macrosetae on abdominal tergum II/inner edge of claws III = 1.7), straight, pointed at tips and slightly serrate. Body sensilla (s) relatively long, but mostly shorter than macrosetae (only on abdominal tergum V slightly longer). Microsensilla (ms) on thoracic tergum II present (Fig. 5). Subcoxae I, II, III with 1, 2, 3 setae, respectively.

  • Antennal segment IV with trilobed apical vesicle, subapical organite (or), microsensillum (ms), 7 (2 lateral, 5 dorsal) cylindrical, subequal sensilla and about 18 thin, slightly curved and blunt-tipped sensilla in ventral field (Fig. 1 and Stach, 1946: pl. II, fig. 1). Antennal segment III organ with two long (lateral) and two short (internal) curved sensilla (Fig. 1). Microsensillum on antennal segment III present. Eversible sac between antennal segments III and IV present but weakly developed. Antennal segment I with 7 setae.

  • Ocelli: 8 + 8. Postantennal organ 2.6 times as large as single ocellus; the former with four lobes, its anterior pair larger than posterior pair. Accessory boss present (Fig. 2).

  • Labrum with 5, 5, 4 setae; 4 prelabrals present. Maxillary head (not well visible) as in Figs 3 and 4. Lamella 1 broadened at tip, protruding beyond teeth. Outer maxillary lobe with two sublobal hairs. Labium hardly visible.

  • Tibiotarsi I, II, III with 19, 19, 18 setae, respectively. Tenent hairs a little shorter than inner edge of claws, pointed. Claws with inner tooth and a pair of lateral teeth. Empodial appendage with broad lamelliform base and filiform apex reaching tip of claw (Fig. 7).

  • Ventral tube with 4 + 4 setae. Furca well developed. Ratio dens + mucro/inner edge of claw III = 2.2, ratio dens/mucro = 2.1. Dens with uniform fine granules and 7 unmodified dorsal setae (basal macroseta slightly exceeding half of dens length). Mucro slender, spoon-like at tip, with low but distinct outer lamella (Fig. 8). Retinaculum with 4 + 4 teeth.

  • Anal spines long (1.4 times as long as inner edge of claws III), slightly curved, situated on basal papillae, unpigmented (Fig. 6).

  • Remarks: Ceratophysella macrocantha, having chaetotaxy of the type B and an empodium with a long filament, is similar to six European species/forms of the armata group: C. attenuata Gisin, 1960 nec Cassagnau, 1959 (Swiss Alps, from cave), C. lawrencei Gisin, 1963 (Alps, Appenines, Carpathians), C. penicilifer Cassagnau, 1964 (France - Massif Central), C. recta Cassagnau, 1959 (Pyrenees), C. scotica (Carpenter & Evans, 1899) (Belarus, Germany, Great Britain, Ireland, Norway, Poland, Ukraine) and C. tergilobata (Cassagnau, 1954) (Mediterranean), and also to three Asian species: C. empodialis Babenko et al., 1994 (Russia - Far East), C. liguladorsi Lee, 1974 (Korea, China, Russia - Southern Sachalin, Indonesia) and C. paraliguladorsi Nguyen, 2001 (Vietnam) (see Gisin, 1960; Babenko et al., 1994; Thibaud et al., 2004; Nguyen, 2001; Skarżyński, 2006).

  • Ceratophysella tergilobata, C. liguladorsi and C. paraliguladorsi can be easily distinguished from C. macrocantha by the presence of a characteristic medial spine-like integumentary projection between the bases of setae p1 on abdominal tergum V. Easy to distinguish are also C. lawrencei and C. scotica (integument with fields of coarse granules), C. penicilifer (six setae on dens, filament of empodium split into three or four branches) and C. empodialis (boat-like mucro as typical for the genus).

  • Closest to C. macrocantha (probably conspecific) seem to be C. recta and C. attenuata. Both differ from the species redescribed here in subtle characters. The first of the above-mentioned has a simple apical vesicle on antennal segment IV, the filament of the empodium ¾ the length of the inner edge of the leg claws, the mucro is almost without an outer lamella and the tenent hairs on the tibiotarsi are clearly longer than the claws. Ceratophysella attenuata, of which I examined four specimens (3 females, 1 male on one slide labelled by Gisin: Ceratophysella attenuata, Fikenloch, cave near Jochpass, canton Obwald, central Switzerland, 2450 m asl., 18.08.1959, leg. M.M. Aellen, Roth and Strinati, deposited at the Muséum d'histoire naturelle in Geneva, Switzerland), differs from C. macrocantha by a shorter filament of the empodium (¾ the length of the inner edge of the claws), by a lower outer lamella on the mucro and by characters which can be the result of evolution in an isolated cave system: very long macrosetae (ratio p5 on abdominal tergum II/inner edge of claws III = 2.5), slightly enlarged and modified postantennal organ (ratio postantennal organ/nearest ocellus = 3, presence of a single small finger-like papilla on one of the four primary lobes) and reduced body pigmentation (only blue-black spots present). To clarify taxonomic relations between these three species/forms further research based on more extensive material is needed.

  • Figs 1-8.

    Ceratophysella macrocantha Stach, 1946. (1) Chaetotaxy of antennal segments III and IV, dorsal side. (2) Postantennal organ and adjacent ocelli. (3) Maxillary head, dorsal side. (4) Maxillary head, ventral side. (5) Chaetotaxy of thoracic tergum II. (6) Chaetotaxy of abdominal terga III-VI. (7) Claw III with empodial appendage. (8) Dens and mucro of furca. Scale lines: 1-2; 3-4; 5-6; 7-8 to same scale. Abbreviations: or - subapical organite on antennal segment IV; ms - microsensillum; a1, a2, a3 - setae of a-row; m2, m3, m4 - setae of m-row; p1, p2, p4 - setae of p-row; s - body sensilla; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 - maxillary lamellae. The longitudinal axis of the body is indicated by a broken line.

    img-z3-3_151.jpg

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    I wish to express my sincere thanks to Prof. Wanda M. Weiner (Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, PAS, Cracow, Poland) and Dr Peter Schwendinger (Muséum d'histoire naturelle in Geneva, Switzerland) for supplying material of C. macrocantha and C. attenuata. Dr Arne Fjellberg (Tjøme, Norway) kindly reviewed the manuscript.

    REFERENCES

    1.

    Babenko A.B., Chernova N.M., Potapov M.B., Stebaeva S.K. 1994. Collembola of Russia and adjacent countries. Family Hypogastruridae. Moscow , Nauka , 336 pp. Google Scholar

    2.

    Bellinger P.F., Christiansen K.A., Janssens F. 2019. Checklist of the Collembola of the World. Available at  http://www.collembola.org (accessed 17 February 2019). Google Scholar

    3.

    Börner C. 1932. Apterygota (pp. 136–143). In : Brohmer P. (ed.). Fauna von Deutschland, 4. Auflage. Quelle & Meyer , Leipzig , 561 pp. Google Scholar

    4.

    Carpenter G.H., Evans W. 1899. The Collembola and Thysanura of the Edinburgh district. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 14: 221–266. Google Scholar

    5.

    Cassagnau P. 1954. Faune française des Collemboles V. Collemboles récoltés en Corse par Miss T. Clay. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of London (B) 23: 239–241. Google Scholar

    6.

    Cassagnau P. 1959. Faune française des Collemboles (IX). Les Hypogastrura s.l. du massif du Néouvielle (Hautes-Pyrénées). Remarques sur la chétotaxie des espèces. Vie et Milieu 9: 476–503. Google Scholar

    7.

    Cassagnau P. 1964. Faune française des Collemboles XIII. Sur les Collemboles épigés de la vallée d'Aure (Hautes-Pyrénées) et sur quelques espèces nouvelles du Sud-Ouest et des Pyrénées. Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse 99: 463–483. Google Scholar

    8.

    Gisin H. 1960. Sur la faune européenne des Collemboles III. Revue suisse de Zoologie 67: 309–322. Google Scholar

    9.

    Gisin H. 1963. Collemboles d'Europe V. Revue suisse de Zoologie 70: 77–101. Google Scholar

    10.

    Lee B.-H. 1974. Etude de la faune Coréenne des insects collemboles II. Description de quatre espèces nouvelles de la famille Hypogastruridae. Nouvelle Revue d'Entomologie 4(2): 89–102. Google Scholar

    11.

    Nguyen T.T. 2001. Some new species of Collembola from Vietnam. Tap chi Sinh hoc 23(3): 1–12. Google Scholar

    12.

    Skarżyński D. 2006. Redescription of Ceratophysella lawrencei (Gisin, 1963) (Collembola: Hypogastruridae). Revue suisse de Zoologie 113(2): 291–296. Google Scholar

    13.

    Stach J. 1946. Ten new species of Collembola from the Alps and alpine foreland. Academia Polona Litterarum et Scientiarum Acta Musei Historiae Naturalis 5: 1–40. Google Scholar

    14.

    Thibaud J.-M., Schulz H.-J., Gama Assalino M.M. da 2004. Synopses on Palaearctic Collembola, Volume 4, Hypogastruridae. Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde , Görlitz, 287 pp. Google Scholar
    Dariusz Skarżyński "Ceratophysella macrocantha Stach, 1946 (Collembola, Hypogastruridae): a redescription of a forgotten species from the Alps," Revue suisse de Zoologie 126(2), 151-154, (1 January 2020). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3463441
    Accepted: 17 April 2019; Published: 1 January 2020
    KEYWORDS
    Europe
    springtails
    taxonomy
    Back to Top