Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
13 November 2023 Atlas of Australasian hormurid scorpions. I. The genus Hormurus Thorell, 1876 in Papua New Guinea. Exceptional morphological diversity in male and female copulatory structures suggests genital coevolution
Lionel Monod, Christina Lehmann-Graber, Christopher C. Austin, Bulisa Iova, Lorenzo Prendini
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

New Guinea is the largest Pacific island, and the world's second largest, with a land area of about 785,000 km2. Located north of Australia, the island was gradually shaped since the Eocene by the geologically recent sequential accretion of several island arc systems onto the northern part of the Australian Craton. This complex geological history has resulted in a tremendous biological diversity with high rates of endemism. On the other hand, the rugged mountainous landscape and lack of infrastructure has hampered scientific research in the country and for the most part Papuan biotas remain thus far only superficially known. This is the case for scorpions of the genus Hormurus Thorell, 1876 (Hormuridae Laurie, 1896; Scorpiones C. L. Koch, 1837). Although they are the dominant scorpion group in Wallacea and Melanesia, only two species are currently recognized from New Guinea and its adjacent islands. A thorough revisionary study of the Hormurus material present in the scientific collections of various museums and of a large series of specimens more recently collected led to the discovery of 16 new species, i.e. Hormurus ancylolobus Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.; Hormurus araiaspathe Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.; Hormurus barai Monod, Iova & Prendini, sp. nov.; Hormurus cameroni Monod, Austin & Prendini, sp. nov.; Hormurus hypseloscolus Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.; Hormurus krausi Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.; Hormurus maiwa Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.; Hormurus menapi Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.; Hormurus muyua Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.; Hormurus oyatabu Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.; Hormurus oyawaka Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.; Hormurus sibonai Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.; Hormurus slapcinskyi Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.; Hormurus sporacanthophorus Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.; Hormurus tagula Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.; Hormurus yela Monod & Prendini, sp. nov. Fully illustrated descriptions of these new taxa are presented in the present contribution, as well as a redescription of Hormurus papuanus Kraepelin, 1914. Hormurus species are characterized by relatively few diagnostic external characters which hampers species differentiation. However, the unusual interspecific diversity of hemispermatophores observed in Papuan taxa partially alleviate this issue and enable reliable species discrimination. The position of the laminar hook is particularly variable and is correlated with the elongation of the female genital operculum which also shows an atypical diversity for the genus. This interdependence strongly suggests genital coevolution driven by a lock-and-key mechanism. This would be the first such case reported for the order Scorpiones Koch, 1837. Multivariate and geometric morphometric analyses were carried out to visually emphasize subtle interspecific differences in external morphology and hemispermatophore morphology. Additionally, the correlation between hemispermatophore laminar hook position and shape of the female genital operculum was assessed statistically and comments are provided concerning potential mechanisms underlying the coevolutionary process.

INTRODUCTION

New Guinea biodiversity and scorpion fauna: With an area of 785,753 km2, New Guinea is the world's largest tropical island. It is located in Melanesia in the southwestern Pacific Ocean, about 150 km north of Australia, and was classified as one of the three major tropical humid wilderness areas (together with Amazonia and the Congo Basin) by Mittermeir et al. (1998, 2003). By definition, these are high-biodiversity ecoregions that are still largely intact (≥70 % of original pristine vegetation remaining), have low human population density (<5 people per km2) and high rates of endemism (≥0.5 % of the world's plants as endemics). New Guinea ecosystems are among the least disturbed on the planet and comprise a wide range of habitats, i.e. mangroves, lowland and montane rainforests, swamp forests, savannas and sub-alpine grasslands. These are home to an astonishing biodiversity with a vast array of endemic plant and animal taxa. The New Guinea flora is actually considered the most diverse on the planet, with a remarkably high rate of endemism, unmatched in the Asia-Pacific Region (Cámara-Leret et al., 2020). Faunistically, the island is equally diverse and unique, with about 8 % of the world's vertebrate and 4 % of the world's butterfly species (Allison, 2007).

This extraordinary assemblage of unique biotas is considered to be for the most part the consequence of a tumultuous geological history that involved the formation of several island arc systems during the last 40 My, their sequential accretion to the northern part of the Australian craton and the resulting orogenic events (Pigram & Davis, 1987; Hall, 1998, 2002; Hill & Hall, 2003; Van Ufford & Cloos, 2005; Baldwin et al., 2012). Two patterns of diversification currently emerge from published biogeographic studies. On one hand, ancient biotas that started diversifiying on the nascent oceanic island arcs before their accretion and show extant distribution patterns correlated to geological terranes (Gressit, 1982; De Boer & Duffels, 1996; Polhemus, 1996; Jønsson et al., 2011; Deiner et al., 2011; Unmack et al., 2013; Aggerbeck et al., 2014; Georges et al., 2014; Kalkman et al., 2013, 2017; Strickland et al., 2016; Rivera et al., 2017; Oliver et al., 2018; Tallowin et al., 2018, 2020), and on the other hand, biota that colonized Proto-New Guinea after the accretion of the major island arcs and the distributions of which are not related to geology (Toussaint et al., 2014; Moyle et al., 2016). Although its biological richness is indisputably acknowledged, the biota of New Guinea remains for the most part virtually unknown, as the discovery of hundreds of species during the last two decades can attest. Between 1998 and 2008, 1060 taxa were officialy described from New Guinea (Thompson, 2011). Significant increases in taxonomic knowledge with the description of numerous new taxa are particularly noteworthy in several poorly known amphibian and invertebrate groups, e.g. mycrohylid frogs (Zweifel et al., 2005; Kraus & Allison, 2006; Günther & Richards, 2011; Kraus, 2011, 2013a, b, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017a, b, 2018, 2019a, b; Günther et al., 2014), charopid land snails of the genus Paryphantopsis Thiele, 1928 (Slapcinsky, 2005, 2006, 2009; Slapcinsky & Lasley, 2007), tetrigid pygmy grasshoppers of the genus Ophiotettix Walker, 1871 (Tumbrinck & Skejo, 2017) and salticid spiders (Maddison, 2009, 2016; Zhang & Maddison, 2012; Maddison & Szűts, 2019). Most notably, megadiverse radiations were revealed in several genera of beetles, i.e. Anthicidae Latreille, 1819: Macratria Newman, 1838 (Telnov, 2011), Curculionidae Latreille, 1802: Trigonopterus Fauvel, 1862 (Riedel et al., 2010, 2013; Van Dam et al., 2016), Dytiscidae Leach, 1815: Exocelina Broun, 1886 (Shaverdo & Balke, 2014, 2019; Shaverdo et al., 2012, 2013, 2014, 2016a, b, c, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020) and Hydraenidae Mulsant, 1844: Hydraena Kugelann, 1794 (Perkins, 2011).

On the other hand, only four scorpion genera belonging to two families are currently recorded from New Guinea (Fet et al., 2000): Hormurus Thorell, 1876 (3 spp.) and Liocheles Sundevall, 1833 (1 sp.) in the Hormuridae Laurie, 1896 and Isometrus Ehrenberg, 1828 (2 spp.) and Lychas C. L. Koch, 1845 (3 spp.) in the Buthidae C. L. Koch, 1837. Except for the genus Liocheles, the low number of species per genus is probably not representative of their true diversity, but rather due to the lack of scientific effort. New Guinea scorpions hitherto remain understudied, with only two new taxa described recently (Lourenço & Qi, 2007; Lourenço, 2011). However, trends observed in other arthropod groups suggest that the scorpion fauna is most probably extremely rich and species numbers are expected to soar pending thorough taxonomic studies. The first systematic revision of the genus Hormurus from Papua New Guinea (PNG), the eastern half of the island, presented here confirms this assumption. The thorough study of an extensive material present in the scientific collections of various museums, and of a large series of specimens more recently collected led to the discovery of 16 new species. The known specific diversity in Hormurus is hereby more than doubled and PNG now becomes the most species-rich region for Hormurus.

As pointed out by Maddison & Zhang (2009) for salticid spiders, the currently recognized species number is probably a gross underestimate of the total Hormurus diversity, and much remains to be discovered. Rugged mountainous terrains and lack of infrastructure have greatly hindered scientific collecting in New Guinea. The interior of the island remains for the most part extremely difficult to reach due to the absence of an efficient road network. As a result, the material presented here comes from only a minuscule part of the territory of PNG, mostly from coastal regions.

Systematics of Hormurus from New Guinea: Only three Hormurus species, currently recognized as valid, are reported from New Guinea, i.e. Hormurus karschii Keyserling, 1885, Hormurus papuanus, recently removed from synonymy (Monod, 2000; Monod et al., 2019), and Hormurus waigiensis (Gervais, 1843). The genus possesses a very conserved external morphology with few diagnostic features, which makes species differentiation difficult. Most of the external interspecific differences are morphometric and mainly restricted to pedipalps of males. Such homogeneity compels the use of mathematical methods together with the search for alternative, maybe less obvious diagnostic traits to reliably resolve taxonomy. Therefore, in addition to the examination of discrete external characters, multivariate morphometric analyses of measurements and geometric morphometric analyses of hemispermatophores were conducted to define the different species.

Moreover, the study revealed that two character systems previously neglected for hormurids, i.e. ventral setation of the metasoma segments and position of the laminar hook on the hemispermatophore stalk, are reliable taxonomic characters for Papuan Hormurus and permit unambiguous identification in most cases. Metasoma setation remains thus far widely unexplored in scorpion systematics. It has only been applied for genus and species diagnoses in a few families, i.e. Hadruridae Stahnke, 1974 (Williams, 1970), Vaejovidae Thorell, 1876 (Sissom & González-Santillán, 2004; Sissom & Hendrixon, 2005; González-Santillán & Prendini, 2013, 2015, 2016; Sissom et al., 2012, 2016), Bothriuridae Simon, 1880 (Mattoni & Acosta, 2005; Ochoa et al., 2011) and Euscorpiidae Laurie, 1896 (González-Santillán & Alvarez Padilla, 2015; González-Santillán et al., 2017). The present work demonstrates that it is also taxonomically informative at the species level in hormurids. Assessment of the variabiliy of setation patterns among Papuan Hormurus allow the elaboration of the first hypothesis for positional homology of macrosetae across segments and across taxa, as well as the proposal of a new nomenclature implementing this postulate.

Hemispermatophores are widely recognized as an important structure for taxonomic differentiation throughout the whole order (Vachon, 1952; San Martin, 1969; Koch, 1977; Lamoral, 1979; Maury, 1980; Francke & Soleglad, 1981; Francke, 1982; Lourenço, 1987, 1989; Stockwell, 1989; Williams & Savary, 1991; Soleglad & Sissom, 2001; Monod & Lourenço, 2005; see Monod et al., 2017 for a more detailed review). However, although the morphology of the male copulatory apparatus is usually reliable to distinguish genera, interspecific variability is not universal (Monod et al., 2017). In many genera hemispermatophores of closely related species show only minuscule differences if at all (Stockwell, 1989; Jacob et al., 2004b; Santibáñez-López & Francke, 2013; Monod, unpublished data). In that regard the variability of laminar hook positions exhibited by Melanesian Hormurus, atypical for the genus, is particularly noteworthy. Unlike in non-Melanesian Hormurus, the laminar hook is not restricted to the basal third of the hemispermatophore stalk but can be located almost anywhere along its entire length, depending on the species. Thus far the occurence of similar significant interspecific heterogeneities was only reported in Bothriurus Peters, 1861 (Maury, 1980) and Orobothriurus Maury, 1975 (Ochoa et al., 2011). Interestingly the shape of the female genital operculum is also unusually diverse in Hormurus and appears to be directly correlated to the position of the hemispermatophore laminar hook. The species with more distally located hooks are also those with the more elongated female genital opercula, strongly suggesting genital coevolution driven by a lock-and-key mechanism. The correlation between these two characters was therefore statistically assessed and the potential mechanisms underlying this unusual coevolutionary process are discussed.

Ultimately the combined use of alpha taxonomy and morphometric statistics enables to reliably identify the vast majority of specimens studied. Enough evidence is thus provided for the distinction of 17 species, 16 of which were undescribed. Fully illustrated descriptions for these new taxa, as well as a redescription of Hormurus papuanus are provided.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Georeferencing and mapping: Only coarse data of geographical coordinates of collecting localities, rounded to the nearest 0.01 degree, are provided following the recommendations of Chapman & Grafton (2008) for ethical management of sensitive primary species occurrence data. The method for a medium level of generalization (category 3) (Chapman, 2020) was applied.

Several new taxa described here are based on old unstudied collections gathered during the XIXth and early XXth centuries. Geographical coordinates for locality records of this material were retrieved from gazetteers and the Geonet Names server ( https://geonames.nga.mil/gns/html/) and are then given in square brackets. However, it was not always possible to trace GPS data solely by reference to these ressources for the following reasons: (1) collecting was often carried out from field camps and not from populated places; (2) names of the villages visited were sometimes improperly spelled or can have several spellings (records were made phonetically); (3) some villages have been destroyed or displaced by landslides, earthquakes, migration or tribal wars.

Fortunately, earlier taxonomists who worked on the Papuan fauna or flora have already made an important effort in tracing these obscure localities. Reviews of the exploration history of the island (Gilliard, 1969; Frodin & Gressit, 1982), as well as the website “Cyclopaedia of Malesian Collectors” ( http://www.nationaalherbarium.nl/FMCollectors/home.htm) were used as a working base for searching historical localities. Most of the old material was gathered during large colonial expeditions that were duly documented, and usually detailed publications with travel report and mapped itinerary can be found. When available, such maps were scanned and georeferenced in ArcGIS version 9.3 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA, U.S.A.); coordinates reported from the software are given between brackets. Original publications from which such data were extracted are referenced in the remarks on the relevant taxon. The aim is to facilitate future taxonomic work on old museum collections from New Guinea.

Distribution maps were produced using ArcGIS version 9.3 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA, U.S.A.) by superimposing point locality records on a SRTM 90 m (3 arc-second) digital elevation model (Jarvis et al., 2008) and on a SRTM 1 km (30 arc-second) global bathymetry dataset (Becker et al., 2009).

Repositories of material examined: Collections containing material examined in the present study are abbreviated as follows: AMNH, American Museum of Natural History (New York, NY, U.S.A.); CAS, Californian Academy of Sciences (San Fransisco, CA, U.S.A.); LSUM, Lousiana State University Museum of Natural Sciences (Baton Rouge, LA, U.S.A.); MHNG, Muséum d'histoire naturelle (Geneva, Switzerland); UMMZ, University of Michigan Museum of Zoology (Ann Harbor, MI, U.S.A.); ZMB, Zoological Museum Berlin (now Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany); ZMH, Zoological Museum Hamburg (now Centrum für Naturkunde, Hamburg, Germany). DNA tissue samples were taken from specimens deposited in the AMNH and UMMZ collections and are stored in the Ambrose Monell Cryocollection at the AMNH. Registration numbers for these samples are given in square brackets. When available, the field codes of John Slapcinsky (JS) are given in brackets.

Examination and dissection: Specimens were examined with a Zeiss Stemi SV8 stereomicroscope. Hemispermatophores were dissected from adult male specimens using microsurgical scissors and forceps. Paraxial organ tissue was then removed manually with forceps.

Morphological terminology and mensuration: Morphological terminology follows Prendini (2000) for carapace sutures and leg spination, Vachon (1956, 1963) for chelicera dentition, Stahnke (1970) for pedipalp segmentation and pectines, Monod et al. (2013) for morphoscultptures of pedipalp chela finger dentate margins, Vachon (1974) for trichobothria patterns, Couzijn (1976) for leg segmentation, González-Santillán & Prendini (2013) for metasoma carination, and Alexander (1956) and Monod et al. (2017) for hemispermatophore morphology. Terminology for pedipalp carinae (see Figs 1-3) is from Prendini (2016). A new nomenclature for metasoma setation, in which macrosetae are named according to their position on the segment and not only according to the carinae on which they are located, is proposed (see chapter “Results for details). Measurements follow Stahnke (1970) and were recorded in millimetres using an ocular micrometer or a Perel 3472B digital caliper. For consistency and ease of comparison, descriptions follow the structure of previous taxonomic publications on Hormurus and Hormiops Fage, 1933 by the first author (Monod et al., 2013; Monod, 2015).

Photographs and illustrations: High resolution images of diagnostic characters were taken under long-wave UV and visible light with a Microptics system at the AMNH and with a custom-built stacking system at the MHNG. Zerene Stacker (Zerene Systems, Richland, WA, U.S.A.) was used to fuse images taken at different focal planes into a single image with a greater depth of field. Photographs were edited (background removal and contrast adjustment) in Adobe Photoshop CS5 and plates were prepared with Adobe illustrator CS5 (both from Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, U.S.A.). Images of several hemispermatophores are provided for some taxa in order to illustrate intraspecific morphological consistency and variability. Habitus drawings were produced digitally on the basis of high quality photographs of preserved specimens.

Multivariate morphometric analyses: Multivariate statistical analyses were conducted following the methodological approach of log-ratios proposed by Mosimann (1970). In multivariate analyses standardization of data aims at minimizing the effects of size variation, thus putting more emphasis on the assessment of body proportions and shape. In the present work standardization was achieved by using shape ratios rather than raw measurements. These ratios were obtained by dividing each measurement (31 for males and 33 for females) by the prosoma length (PL) which is a good proxy for overall specimen size. Ratios were subsequently log-transformed in order to conform the data to normality.

Discriminant Analyses of Principal Components (DAPC: Jombart et al., 2010) were carried out on the log-ratios of males and females using the adegenet package (Jombart, 2008) developed for the R environment (R Development Core Team, 2011). DAPC aims to describe and identify clusters of morphologically similar individuals by providing a visual assessment of the between-group discrimination. DAPC is performed in two steps. Suitability of variables for the Discrimant Analysis (DA) (Fischer, 1936; Lachenbruch & Goldstein, 1979) is achieved by data transformation using an initial Principal Components Analysis (PCA) (Pearson, 1901; Hotelling, 1933a, b).

Fig. 1.

Hormurus ancylolobus sp. nov., female (AMNH [LP 4339]); carinal pattern of right pedipalp chela, according to the terminology proposed by Prendini (2016). (A) Dorsal aspect. (B) Retrolateral aspect. (C) Ventral aspect. (D) Prolateral aspect.

img-z5-1_01.jpg

Fig. 2.

Hormurus ancylolobus sp. nov., female (AMNH [LP 4339]); carinal pattern of right pedipalp patella, according to the terminology proposed by Prendini (2016). (A) Dorsal aspect. (B) Retrolateral aspect. (C) Ventral aspect. (D) Prolateral aspect.

img-z6-1_01.jpg

Fig. 3.

Hormurus ancylolobus sp. nov., female (AMNH [LP 4339]); carinal pattern of right pedipalp femur, according to the terminology proposed by Prendini (2016). (A) Dorsal aspect. (B) Retrolateral aspect. (C) Ventral aspect. (D) Prolateral aspect.

img-z7-1_01.jpg

PCA is a statistical method of dimensionality reduction used to extract the important information contained in very large multivariate datasets and to summarize it into a smaller set of new synthetic variables called Principal Components (PAs). PAs are linear combinations of the original quantitative variables that maximize the variance of the projected data. The proportion of variance explained by each PA is removed from the dataset before computation of the next one. The second and following PAs are then iteratively calculated from subsets of the data until all the variability has been extracted. Because PCA focuses on the overall variation among individuals, which includes between-group and within-group divergences, the method is likely to overlook differences between groups and is thus inappropriate for reliable assessment and discrimination of clusters.

On the other hand, DA seeks the principal components that maximize between-group variance, while neglecting within-group variance. The method therefore determines which combinations of variables best discriminate individuals into pre-defined clusters. Unfortunately, it requires the number of variables to be lower than the number of individuals and it is strongly affected by data correlation. In a DAPC framework the primary PCA overcomes these limitations by ensuring that the synthetic variables submitted to the DA are perfectly uncorrelated and that their number is lower than that of the specimens. The number of PCs retained from the initial PCA step is critical to ensure that the DAPC is stable and that it discriminates significantly between clusters. While too few dimensions will induce a loss of information and thus have an insufficient discrimination power, too many dimensions can lead to over-fitting. Indeed, excessive numbers of PCs will result in discriminant functions that could virtually model any structure and differentiate any set of random clusters. The a-score, which measures the trade-off between power of discrimination and over-fitting, was used in the present work as a criterion to determine the optimal number of components.

The a-score is computed as the difference between the proportion of successful re-assignment of individuals in the original space (observed discrimination) and as the proportion of successful re-assignments using randomized clusters (artificial discrimination). Optimally, it should tend toward one (high probability of re-assignments to true clusters and low probability of artificial re-assignments); a-scores close to zero indicate weak discrimination or instability of the results. For each set of PCs in a pre-defined range the function optim.a.score iteratively computes the a-scores for each cluster, as well as the average a-score over all clusters. It subsequently interpolates the results using splines and predicts an approximate optimal number of PCs based on the highest mean a-score.

Finally, characters that contributed the most to the discrimination between groups were assessed using the command loadingplot().

Geometric morphometric analysis: Geometric morphometrics (Rohlf & Marcus, 1993; Adams et al., 2004) is a set of analytical methods to mathematically measure morphological similarity and difference using geometrics coordinates instead of measurements. Each object is described as a series of points called landmarks, which are defined by coordinates and can be mapped as a single point into a geometric space. All objects are depicted by the same set of landmarks and can thus be compared on the basis of topological homology (Bookstein, 1991, 1996, 1998).

Landmarks are established based on structural configurations which are invariant across the sample of specimens that allow the observer to topologically define a single point, i.e. extremum or merging point of boundary outlines. Semi-landmarks, on the other hand, are points located along outline curves of specimens. Despite having a higher spatial freedom than landmarks, they are constrained to remain on the contour they are meant to capture and to “slide” along this path for maximizing positional homology between specimens (Green, 1996; Bookstein, 1997).

The morphometric analysis was restricted to the hemispermatophore stalk, because its partial sclerotization ensures shape integrity in fixed specimens, whereas the stem comprises soft tissues and can be heavily distorted. For each male specimen, photographs of both dissected hemispermatophores were taken in order to account for potential asymmetry. The structures were consistently oriented so that the stalks lie in a horizontal plane.

Landmarks and semilandmarks were digitized on these images using the Tps software series (Rohlf, 2015). Initial capture of the point coordinates was carried out using the curve-tracing function in TpsDig2 version 2.31 (Rohlf, 2006). Then two input files for subsequent superimposition computation were generated with TpsUtil version 1.76 (Rolf, 2004), i.e. a tps file with point coordinates and a csv file indicating which points should be considered as semilandmarks and slid between fixed landmarks. Errors in the csv file were corrected manually with a text editor.

A Generalized Procrustes Analysis (GPA) (Gower, 1975; Rohlf & Slice, 1990) was performed on the dataset using the gpagen() function implemented in the R package Geomorph version 3.2.1 (Adams et al., 2020). GPA is a statistical method which assesses the similarities and differences in shape across a set of configurations based on the superimposition of landmarks/semi-landmarks. It generates shape variables using an estimated optimal “mean shape” as the reference for superimposition.

Optimal superimposition of raw landmark coordinates was conducted in three steps: (1) translation: centroids of all specimens were aligned on the origin of the coordinate system; (2) uniform scaling: specimens were scaled to a unit centroid size; (3) rotation: specimens were rotated until the least-squares distances between coordinates of corresponding points was minimized. The positions of semi-landmarks were further optimized by sliding along the contours until the differences among the positions of corresponding points along an outline in a reference configuration were minimized (Bookstein, 1997; Adams et al., 2004).

The resulting shape space (the geometrical representation of all possible shapes), from which the aligned Procrustes coordinates were inferred, was curved and multidimentional (Kendall, 1984; Klingenberg, 2020). Because computations in this non-linear non-Euclidean space are too ponderous, variables must be projected onto a “flat”, linear tangent space named Kendall's tangent space. This local approximation of the original space yields Euclidean coordinates (Dryden & Mardia, 1993; Rohlf, 1999) that can be exploited in subsequent statistical analyses.

In order to visually assess the morphological discrimination between clusters, the Kendall's tangent space coordinates obtained from the GPA were submitted to a DAPC following the procedure described above.

Statistical correlation assessment: The ratio between the length of the basal part of the stalk (distance from base of stalk to base of hook) and the length of the distal lamina (distance from base of hook to laminar apex) was calculated for each hemispermatophore based on the photographs. A boxplot graph showing the ratio values for each species was produced with the boxplot() function in Base R (R Development Core Team, 2011). This was also done for the length/width ratio of the female genital operculum.

The boxplot() command also permitted the median to be computed for each group. These variables were used to perform a correlation test between the lamellar hook position ratio and the female genital operculum ratio. Species for which hemispermatophores or female genital opercula are unknown were omitted. A Shapiro-Wilk test (Shapiro & Wilk, 1965) was carried out with the shapiro.test() function in order to determine if the data were normaly distributed. Based on the results, a Kendall rank correlation test (Kendall, 1938) was executed with the command cor.test(x, y, method = “kendall”). The Kendall rank correlation is a non-parametric test that measures the concordance between paired samples. It is considered a better alternative to the Spearman correlation when the sample size is small (Puth et al., 2015).

RESULTS

Ventral setation of metasoma segments: Previous nomenclatural systems of metasoma setation (Williams, 1970; Sissom & González-Santillán, 2004; Sissom & Hendrixon, 2005; Mattoni & Acosta, 2005; Ochoa et al., 2011; Sissom et al., 2012, 2016; González-Santillán & Prendini, 2013, 2015, 2016; González-Santillán & Alvarez Padilla, 2015; González-Santillán et al., 2017) did not take into account the position of the macrosetae in relation to the length of the segments, only their occurence on a particular carina. However, a characterization of the longitudinal arrangement of each group of ventral macrosetae appears to be necessary to propose reliable hypotheses of homology and a character system usable for taxa discrimination.

In many specimens most of the macrosetae had fallen off. Setal positions were thus determined in large part by the presence of basal cup-shaped sockets/areolas, which are the points of insertion of setae into the cuticle. Although the number and position of macrosetae sometimes differ between species, short microsetae were always present on areas where macroseta were identified in at least one taxon. This suggests that setae do not randomly occur on the cuticle and that they can only be expressed in a limited number of fixed spots, either as macro- or microsetae. Pedipalp trichobothria patterns are established by a similar regulatory process in which stable “placeholders” can be activated either as trichobothria, macro- or microsetae (Prendini et al., 2010). This “placeholder” concept is applied here to determine metasoma setal configuration and homology.

All metasoma segments are serially homologous. A basic bauplan of ventral setation should therefore be recognizable across all segments and all species, even when accessory macrosetae are present. The pattern with the lowest number of macrosetae is regarded as the primary configuration from which all other setal configurations were derived. It is composed of eight macrosetae, i.e. three pairs of macrosetae (anterior, median and posterior) on the ventrosubmedian carinae and one pair (anterior) on the ventrolateral carinae, indicated in yellow in Fig. 4.

Of all taxa studied here Hormurus barai sp. nov. possesses the lowest number of macrosetae on the ventral side of its metasoma segments (Fig. 4A). In this species the first four segments exhibit the basic pattern of eight macrosetae. Setation of the fifth segment was slightly different, with two groups of additional macrosetae for a total of twelve: (1) an extra pair, present in the posterior group on the ventrolateral carinae, was considered part of the basic pattern for segment V and is marked in yellow; (2) two additional supramedian macrosetae on the ventrolateral carinae, situated between the median and posterior groups, are considered as primary accessory setae and are indicated in green in Fig. 4A.

The number of these supramedian macrosetae on metasoma segment V varies from two (Fig. 4B, D-E) to four (Fig. 4A, C, F). Supramedian macrosetae were also observed on the ventrolateral carinae of segments II-IV in all taxa except H. barai sp. nov. (Fig. 4B-F) and on the ventrolateral carinae of segment I in some species (Fig. 4E-F). There the total number of macrosetae present on one segment is ten.

Few species possessed four extra subposterior macrosetae (two on the ventrosubmedian carinae and two on the ventrolateral carinae) between the supramedian and posterior group on segment V (indicated in white in Fig. 4D-F). Finally, Hormurus yela sp. nov., the species with the highest count of ventral macrosetae, possesses two extra sets also marked in white in Fig. 4F: (1) an additional pair in the median group on the ventrolateral carinae of all segments; (2) four additional submedian macrosetae (two on the ventrosubmedian carinae and two on ventrolateral carinae) situated between the anterior and median groups of segments II-IV. All these macrosetae are considered as secondary accessory setae. The setation patterns presented here are constant within species. The intraspecific variability observed was negligible and mostly limited to the occurence of abnormal configurations (one or two additional or missing macrosetae) usually only observed on one segment, whereas the regular pattern was expressed in the others. Only four species, i.e. Hormurus cameroni sp. nov., Hormurus maiwa sp. nov., Hormurus menapi sp. nov. (Fig. 4D) and Hormurus muyua sp. nov., display a variable setation on segment I. Two patterns (eight or ten macrosetae) were observed among the specimens of each of these taxa, without the prevalence of one or the other.

Fig. 4.

Ventral setation of metasoma in species of Hormurus Thorell, 1876 from Papua-New Guinea. Macrosetae comprising basic pattern (see text) are indicated in yellow, primary accessory macrosetae in green and secondary accessory macrosetae in white. Abbreviations: a (anterior), m (median), p (posterior), sbm (submedian), sp (subposterior), spm (supramedian). Dashed circles in the same color as the corresponding cluster indicate missing macrosetae relative to the basic pattern whereas white dashed circles indicate supernumerary macroseate.

img-z10-1_01.jpg

In the present contribution metasoma setation is sucessfully used as a diagnostic character for species in the genus Hormurus, and the first terminology for setal homology across segments and taxa is presented. Moreover, a preliminary assessment of a wider range of taxa suggests that this character system is also informative in other groups of scorpions at various taxonomic levels.

Species groups defined on the basis of hemispermatophore morphology: The position of the laminar hook on the hemispermatophore stalk was identified as a very important diagnostic character for Papuan Hormurus. It can be mathematically expressed as the length of the basal part of the stalk (distance from base of stalk to base of hook) divided by the length of the distal lamina (distance from base of hook to laminar apex). For each species this ratio is directly correlated with the length/width ratio of the female genital operculum (see relevant geometric morphometric and statistical analyses below). These two quantifiable and correlated characters allow five artificial (not based on phylogenetic evidence) groups of species to be identified. In the “Systematics section the sequence of species presented follows this grouping:

  • - Species with basal laminar hook (situated in basal third of stalk; basal part/distal lamina ratio < 0.5; Fig. 5A) and with distinctly wider than long female genital operculum (length/width ratio < 0.85):

    Hormurus araiaspathe sp. nov.

    Hormurus barai sp. nov.

    Hormurus oyawaka sp. nov.

    Hormurus oyatabu sp. nov.

  • - Species with submedian laminar hook (situated between 1/3 and 3/7 of hemispermatophore stalk length from base of stalk; basal part/distal lamina ratio > 0.5 and < 0.75; Fig. 5B) and female genital operculum distinctly wider than long (length/width ratio < 0.85):

    Hormurus muyua sp. nov.

    Hormurus slapcinskyi sp. nov.

    Hormurus ancylolobus sp. nov.

  • - Species with submedian laminar hook (situated between 1/3 and 3/7 of hemispermatophore stalk length from base of stalk; basal part/distal lamina ratio > 0.5 and < 0.75; Fig. 5B) and female genital operculum as wide as long or nearly so (length/width ratio > 0.85 and < 1):

    Hormurus cameroni sp. nov.

    Hormurus yela sp. nov.

    Hormurus maiwa sp. nov.

  • - Species with median laminar hook (situated between 3/7 and 1/2 of hemispermatophore stalk length from base of stalk; basal part/distal lamina ratio > 0.75 and < 1; Fig. 5C) and female genital operculum as wide as long or nearly so (length/width ratio > 0.85 and < 1):

    Hormurus papuanus Kraepelin, 1914

    Hormurus sporacanthophorus sp. nov.

    Hormurus menapi sp. nov.

  • - Species with distal laminar hook (situated in distal half of stalk; basal part/distal lamina ratio > 1; Fig. 5D) and female genital operculum longer than wide (length/width ratio > 1):

    Hormurus tagula sp. nov.

    Hormurus sibonai sp. nov.

    Hormurus krausi sp. nov.

    Hormurus hypseloscolus sp. nov.

Multivariate morphometric analyses of measurements: The optimal a-scores computed for DAPC of male and female measurements were both obtained by retaining the first four PCs that respectively represent 81.6 % and 82.8 % of the total variance. Four discriminant functions were saved for each discriminant analyses.

The results of the DAPC of male measurements (Fig. 6A) showed that Hormurus araiaspathe sp. nov., H. sporacanthophorus sp. nov., H. barai sp. nov., H. hypseloscolus sp. nov., H. krausi sp. nov., H. papuanus and H. yela sp. nov. are clearly separated from their congeners. Hormurus oyatabu sp. nov./H. oyawaka sp. nov., H. maiwa sp. nov./H. muyua sp. nov. and H. sibonai sp. nov./H. tagula sp. nov. form three additional morphologically distinct groups. On the other hand, H. cameroni sp. nov., H. menapi sp. nov. and H. slapcinskyi sp. nov. overlap in morphospace, suggesting that these species are very similar morphologically. Although H. yela sp. nov. and H. maiwa sp. nov./H. muyua sp. nov. do not overlap with the preceding cluster, they are not significantly distant from it.

Results of the DAPC on females measurements (Fig. 6B) retrieved most of the group discrimination computed by the DAPC on male measurements, e.g. H. sporacanthophorus sp. nov., H. barai sp. nov., H. krausi sp. nov., H. papuanus, H. yela sp. nov. and the clusters H. oyatabu sp. nov./H. oyawaka sp. nov. and H. cameroni sp. nov./H. menapi sp. nov. However, clusters and species are generally closer to each other, suggesting that morphological divergence is less significant than in males. Differences from the male DAPC are as follows: H. tagula sp. nov. is placed together with H. hypseloscolus sp. nov. rather than far apart, H. slapcinskyi sp. nov. clusters with H. muyua sp. nov. rather than with H. cameroni sp. nov./H. menapi sp. nov., and H. maiwa sp. nov. is separated from H. muyua sp. nov.

Fig. 5.

Variability in the position of the lamellar hook on the hemispermatophore stalk in Papuan Hormurus Thorell, 1876. The stalk is on a grey background, and different shades indicate four defined positions (basal, submedian, median and distal) and areas of the stalk (proportions of the stalk for each mark are also given). (A) H. barai sp. nov. (B) H. slapcinskyi sp. nov. (C) H. menapi sp. nov. (D) H. sibonai sp. nov.

img-z12-3_01.jpg

The following characters contributed the most to the discrimination between species (they are listed from the most to the least important): (1) in males (Fig. 7A): femur length, chela height, patella length, chela length, patella height, femur height, width of metasoma segments I and II; (2) in females (Fig. 7B): genital operculum length, chela height, width of metasoma segment I, height of metasoma segment I, height of telson, genital operculum width, femur length and femur width.

Fig. 6.

Multivariate morphometric analysis of Papuan species of Hormurus Thorell, 1876. Scatterplots of Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components (DAPC). (A) Males. (B) Females. For each analysis the left graph displays the cumulative variance explained by eigenvalues of the Principal Components Analysis (PCA), whereas the right graph displays Discriminant analysis (DA) eigenvalues and their respective contributions to variance. Darker bars in the PCA inset represent principal components retained for the analyses, and discriminant functions in the DA inset.

img-z13-1_01.jpg

Fig. 7.

Multivariate morphometric analysis of Papuan species of Hormurus Thorell, 1876. Variable contributions to the discrimination of species according to the Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components (DAPC). (A) Males. (B) Females.

img-z14-1_01.jpg

Geometric morphometric analysis of hemispermatophore stalks: The optimal a-score computed for a DAPC performed on the Kendall's tangent space coordinates of hemispermatophore stalks obtained from the GPA was reached when the first six PCs were retained. These components represent 81.2 % of the total variance. Six discriminant functions were saved for the DA.

Most species are clearly separated from each other in the DAPC scatter plot (Fig. 8B). As in the multivariate morphometric analysis of measurements (Fig. 6A), H. araiaspathe sp. nov., H. barai sp. nov., H. hypseloscolus sp. nov., H. krausi sp. nov., H. sibonai sp. nov., H. yela sp. nov., and the clusters H. oyatabu sp. nov./H. oyawaka sp. nov. and H. maiwa sp. nov./H. muyua sp. nov. are clearly separated from each other. Moreover, there is a distinct separation between Hormurus cameroni sp. nov., H. menapi sp. nov. and H. slapcinskyi sp. nov., three species that group together in the previous analysis. On the other hand, H. sporacanthophorus sp. nov. and H. papuanus sp. nov., which differ markedly in their body measurements, cannot be separated by the morphology of their hemispermatophores. Hormurus muyua sp. nov. and H. slapcinskyi sp. nov. also form a cluster, unlike in the analysis of measurements.

Statistical assessment of the correlation between laminar hook and female genital operculum: The position of the lamellar hook on the hemispermatophore stalk, expressed here as the basal part/distal lamina ratio, varies markedly among Papuan Hormurus (Fig. 9A). The dimensions of the female genital operculum, expressed as the width/length ratio, follows a similar pattern (Fig. 9B). Interestingly, the two ratios are correlated: the species with the most distal laminar hooks are also those in which the females possess the most elongated genital opercula and, conversely, the species with the most basal laminar hooks are those with the shortest female genital opercula.

The Shapiro-Wilk tests performed on the median values before the correlation test show that the hemispermatophore data are not normally distributed (W = 0.80231, p-value = 0.007262), whereas the female genital operculum data are (W = 0.97265, p-value = 0.9238). The use of the non-parametric Kendall rank correlation test is therefore justified.

The correlation coefficient between the basal part/distal lamina ratio of the hemispermatophore stalk and the width/length ratio of the female genital operculum (Kendall's rank correlation tau = 0.8205128, T = 71, p-value = 1.347e-05) indicate that the two variables are significantly correlated. Examination of the graph (Fig. 10) shows a non-linear monotonic correlation.

Fig. 8.

Geometric morphometric analysis of hemispermatophore stalks of Papuan species of Hormurus Thorell, 1876. (A) Landmarks (red dots) and semilandmarks (black dots). (B) Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components (DAPC) scatterplot of aligned procrustes coordinates projected in Kendall's space. The upper graph displays cumulative variance explained by eigenvalues of the Principal Components Analysis (PCA), whereas the lower graph displays Discriminant analysis (DA) eigenvalues and their respective contributions to variance. Darker bars in the PCA inset represent principal components retained, and discriminant functions in the DA inset. The deformation grids on the left and bottom are showing the shape differences between the reference (A) and the minimum and maximum values of the two PC axes.

img-z15-1_01.jpg

Fig. 9.

Boxplot graphs for characters of Papuan species of Hormurus Thorell, 1876. (A) Boxplot graph for basal part/distal lamina ratios of the hemispermatophore stalk. (B) Boxplot graph for width/length ratios of female genital operculum.

img-z16-1_01.jpg

Fig. 10.

Graph showing the non-linear monotonic correlation between basal part/distal lamina ratios of hemispermatophore stalks and width/length ratios of female genital opercula (Kendall's rank correlation tau = 0.8205128, T = 71, p-value = 1.347e-05) in Papuan species of Hormurus Thorell, 1876.

img-z17-1_01.jpg

DISCUSSION

Combined morphological-morphometrical approach to taxonomy of Papuan Hormurus: The morphological similarity between many Papuan Hormurus make their identification relatively difficult. However, multivariate morphometrics analyses provide an efficient tool to reveal and quantify small differences in body proportions that are very difficult, if not impossible, to assess by visual examination alone. This method can significantly facilitate taxonomic assessment and provide additional evidence for delineating morphospecies. Additionally, the morphology of hemispermatophores is another character that proved to be very reliable for differentiating Papuan Hormurus, more so than for non-Papuan representatives of the genus (Monod, unpublished data). Although three species described in the present paper are very difficult to distinguish based on external morphology alone, they can be unambiguously separated by the shape of the male genital apparatus. These three species are H. cameroni sp. nov., H. menapi sp. nov. and H. slapcinskyi sp. nov. However, the converse is also true: two species (i.e. H. sporacanthophorus sp. nov. and H. papuanus) with conspicuous differences in external morphology have very similar hemispermatophores.

Therefore an approach that incorporates a more mathematical perspective to the traditional examination of morphology, both external and internal, is needed when conducting taxonomic work on Hormurus. Only one character system, whether it is external morphology, hemispermatophore shape or morphometric evaluation, could not be applied consistently to successfully identify all species within the genus.

Hemispermatophore and female genital operculum coevolution: The lock-and-key hypothesis, first proposed by Dufour (1844), suggests that morphological incompatibilities between genitalia of different species prevent or at least reduce the success of copulation and/or insemination, eventually resulting in reproductive isolation. Although it has been documented in many taxa (Mikkola, 1992; Sota & Kubota, 1998; Arnqvist & Rowe, 2002; Simmons, 2014 for a review), the idea of speciation by mechanical fit of sexual structures steered intense controversy as contradicting evidence was also gathered in several groups (Shapiro & Porter, 1989; Masly, 2012 for a review).

The original structural lock-and-key hypothesis implies a strict coevolution of male and female sexual structures. However, such correlated changes in male and female genital morphology among sibling taxa appear to be quite uncommon (Masly, 2012). In most cases, although males of closely related species present significant genitalic diversity, variations of the female reproductive apparatus among these species remain quite limited, if they are present at all.

A second lock-and-key mechanism involving sensory rather than structural isolation was then proposed to account for the sexual asymmetry in the degree of genital variability (De Wilde, 1964; Eberhard, 1992). This new postulate suggests that morphological differences in male genitalia can trigger negative behavioural or physiological stimuli in one or both sexes during mating attempts, eventually leading to the disruption of copulation and/or a reduction of postcopulatory reproductive fitness.

However, female genitalia are not as morphologically constant as they appear to be in some taxa. Interspecific differences are often present, usually less conspicuous than those observed in males and in most cases inadequately studied. The occurence of species-specific traits in the female reproductive apparatus and matching divergence patterns with male sexual features have been recently reported in several taxa with seemingly invariable female genitalia (Kamimura & Mitsumoto, 2012; Yassin & Orgogozo, 2013; Ribeiro et al., 2019; Masly, 2012; see Simmons, 2014 for more examples).

Although, in many cases, structural lock-and-key mechanisms are not the sole cause of genitalic diversity and reproductive isolation, they remain nonetheless a very important factor for the establishment of prezygotic barriers to gene flow and therefore should not be completely dismissed when assessing speciation processes (Anderson & Langerhans, 2015; Brennan & Prum, 2015; Barnard et al., 2017).

In Papuan Hormurus interspecific morphological divergence of hemispermatophores and of female genital opercula are present and both appear to be almost perfectly correlated. The more distal the laminar hook is situated, the more elongated is the female operculum. This is the first time male-female genital coevolution is documented in scorpions. In all taxa previously investigated female sexual morphology is relatively uniform, while male spermatophores exhibit significant interspecific variability (Peretti, 2010).

The genitalia coevolution presented here is hypothesised to be the result of limitations imposed on insemination success by structural constraints. In a resting position the female genital operculum completely covers the female gonopore. During copulation the hemispermatophore laminar hook grips the posterior margin of the female genital plate, allowing the hemispermatophore stalk to act as a lever for the plate, thus exposing the gonopore and enabling intromission of the holosolenos (Monod et al., 2017). Accordingly, when the length of the basal part of the hemispermatophore stalk corresponds to the length of the female genital operculum, the intromittent holosolenos will be directly facing the female gonopore, and its evertion into the female genital tract can then be carried out flawlessly. However, a size mismatch between the two structures will result in the non-alignment between the holosolenos and the female gonopore. Although such an incompatibility will certainly not completely prevent hybridization, it will significantly reduce the reproductive success of heterospecific matings by lowering insemination success.

Monandry and reinforcement in Papuan Hormurus: Sexual selection is considered to be the main driving force of male genital diversification (Simmons, 2014). As a result, male genital morphology is generally more diverse in polyandrous than in monandrous taxa, because sexual selection is arguably more intense when females mate with several males (Eberhard, 1985; Roig-Alsina, 1993; Robinson & Novak, 1997; Arnqvist, 1998; Simmons, 2001). By extension, sexual selection usually also triggers a higher speciation rate in polyandrous than monandrous clades (Arnqvist et al., 2000). In these cases post-mating sexual conflict is considered the key factor for genital evolution and speciation (Holland & Rice, 1999; Eberhard, 1996; Arnqvist, 1998; Arnqvist et al., 2000).

On the other hand, reinforcement (selection against hybridization) may also act as a determinant factor for genital and species diversity (Parker & Partridge, 1998; Coyne & Orr, 1998). When two populations that have developed partial postzygotic reproductive isolation in allopatry subsequently come into secondary contact, sympatry will eventually promote a reinforcement of the preexisting mating barriers. While polyandrous females are likely to mate with both conspecific and heterospecific males and thus have conspecific and hybrid offspring, monandrous females will either produce only conspecific offspring or only hybrids. The selection against hybridization is thus expected to be more intense and consequently the species richness higher under monandry than under polyandry (Arnqvist et al., 2000). Many species belonging to the genera Hormiops, Hormurus and Liocheles appear to be monandrous (Monod, unpublished data). Once mated, females refuse to copulate again until they give birth. Moreover, the presence of gel-like mating plugs, reported here for the first time in three species of Papuan Hormurus, appear to confirm the occurence of monandry (Fig. 11). This trait can probably be generalized for the entire genus, but that remains to be confirmed. As expected to monandrous taxa under sexual selection, the morphological diversity of genitalia is quite limited in Hormiops, Hormurus and Liocheles (Monod, 2000, 2011a, b, 2015, unpublished data; Monod & Volschenk, 2004; Monod et al., 2013). A similar pattern involving monandry, low genital diversity and gel-like mating plugs has already been reported for the genus Euscorpius Thorell, 1876 (Euscorpiidae) (Angermann, 1957; Jacob et al., 2004a, b; Althaus et al., 2010).

Fig. 11.

Mating plugs in Papuan species of Hormurus Thorell, 1876. (A) H. krausi sp. nov. (ZMB 7603, Astrolabe Bay). (B) H. menapi sp. nov. (AMNH). (C) H. maiwa sp. nov. (AMNH, Peria Creek). Scale lines: 2 mm (A), 1 mm (B-C).

img-z19-1_01.jpg

However, as demonstrated above, Papuan Hormurus exhibit an unusual diversity in the male and in the female genital apparatus, suggesting that reinforcement is here more prevalent than sexual selection. Pre-insemination hybridization avoidance would be congruent with the lock-and-key mechanism presented above as the prefered hypothesis. Given the tumultuous geology of the region, it is plausible that the current diversity of autochthonous taxa in Melanesia, and in New Guinea especially, resulted from a sequence of multiple allopatric cladogenesis events followed by secondary contacts between partially divergent lineages. On the other hand, geological stability and a prevalence of allopatric speciation with limited secondary sympatry would then explain the lower genital diversity observed in hormurid taxa of Australia and mainland Southeast Asia.

SYSTEMATICS

Family Hormuridae Laurie, 1896
Genus Hormurus Thorell, 1876
Hormurus araiaspathe Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.
Figs 4B, 12-20, Tab. 1

  • This species was treated under the manuscript name “Hormurus eukteanospatha” in Monod (2011a: 285, 532, 537).

  • Material: AMNH [LP4340]; ♂ holotype; Papua New Guinea, East New Britain Province, Wowo, 11 km NW of Marmar village, on old logging road to Pakia, about 850 m, 5.45°S, 151.46°E; 23.II.2005; leg. J.D. Slapcinsky & K. Netchy (JS 769).

  • Etymology: The name araiaspathe is derived from the ancient Greek words “ἀραιóς, ἀραιά, ἀραιóν” [thin, narrow, slight, slender] and “σπάθη” [broad blade]. The epithet is an invariable feminine noun in apposition and refers to the unusually slender distal lamina of the hemispermatophore.

  • Diagnosis: Hormurus araiaspathe sp. nov. differs from other Papuan Hormurus by the following combination of characters. The male holotype has a distinct proximal gap between the suprabasal lobe of the fixed finger and a corresponding notch on the fixed finger (Fig. 15A), as in males of H. barai sp. nov. (Fig. 25A), H. oyatabu sp. nov. (Fig. 43A), Hormurus oyawaka sp. nov. (Fig. 34A) and H. krausi sp. nov. (Fig. 152A), whereas in other species the fingers are contiguous; H. araiaspathe sp. nov. also possesses a very weak patellar process without a medially located apex (Figs 12, 14E, G), like H. barai sp. nov. (Figs 22, 24F-G, I), whereas all other Papuan species have a more strongly developed patellar process with a medially located pointed apex; telotarsi I-III have one to two small ventromedian spinules (Fig. 17A-C), whereas other species have no such spinules; one to three retroventral spinules are located proximally on the telotarsi (Fig. 17), whereas other species are equipped with only one proximal spinule; the anal arch of metasoma segment V has few weak spinules (Fig. 18C), whereas it is crenulate or with conical teeth in other species; metasoma segment V bears 12 ventral macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on the ventrosubmedian carinae and three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on the lateral carinae (Figs 4B, 18B), whereas this segment bears 14 or more macrosetae in the other species; the distal lamina of the hemispermatophore is unusually slender, narrower than the basal part of the stalk (Fig. 19), whereas distal lamina and stalk base are similar in width in all other species.

  • Description of adult male: Colouration (Fig. 12): Dorsal surface of chelicera manus dark orange, anterior part with darker infuscation; fingers dark brown. Carapace reddish brown, median ocular region black. Tergites reddish brown. Pedipalps reddish dark brown to black; carinae and fingers black. Legs slightly paler than tergites, pale brown with brown infuscation dorsally, orange to reddish brown ventrally, prolateral carina of femora black. Coxapophyses I-II dark reddish brown; leg coxae and sternum orange with dark brown infuscation; sternites light to dark brown, posterior half of sternite V pale yellow; genital operculum and pectines pale yellow. Metasoma dark brown to black; telson slightly paler than metasoma, dark reddish brown, aculeus black.

  • Cuticle: Nongranular surfaces of carapace, pedipalps, legs, mesosoma and metasoma finely punctate.

  • Carapace (Fig. 13A-B): Anterior margin with median notch moderately excavated. Anterior furcated sutures distinct. Median ocular tubercle slightly raised; median ocelli at least twice the size of lateral ocelli, separated from each other by approximately the diameter of a median ocellus. Three pairs of lateral ocelli, equal in size, equidistant and adjacent to each other. Surfaces minutely and sparsely granular, except for smooth anterior areas of frontal lobes and median ocular area.

  • Chelicerae: Basal and median teeth of fixed finger fused into bicusp. Dorsal margin of movable finger with four teeth (one basal, one median, one subdistal and one distal); dorsal distal tooth smaller than ventral distal tooth; ventral margin smooth.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 12, 14): Segments rather short and stout, with femur length approximately equal to that of carapace. Chela almost asetose.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 15): Fixed finger: basal lobe present and conical; suprabasal notch distinct and deep; basal lobe small; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to median lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent on suprabasal notch; few sparse denticles on basal lobe. Movable finger: basal lobe absent; suprabasal lobe well developed but markedly wider than high, gently rounded dorsally and lacking a sharp conical tooth, not overlapping with fixed finger; suprabasal lobe and corresponding notch on fixed finger with distinct proximal gap; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to suprabasal lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles on basal notch absent; few sparse denticles basally.

  • Pedipalp carinae: Femur (Fig. 14I-L): proventral carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; promedian carinae absent; prodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, similarly developed as proventral carina; retrodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, more distinct in proximal third, less strongly developed than prodorsal carina; retroventral carina visible as a ridge of medium to large spiniform granules, slightly more developed than retrodorsal carina; ventromedian carina obsolete, only distinct proximally as a costate-granular ridge. Patella (Fig. 14E-H): proventral carina visible as a costate-granular ridge proximally, obsolete distally; promedian and prodorsal carinae visible as ridges with medium to large spiniform granules, equally developed, fused medially into low spiniform process without medially located apex; dorsomedian carina only visible proximally as a ridge of small spiniform granules; retrodorsal carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a ridge of small spiniform granules; paired retromedian carinae fused and visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (comprising medium to large granules). Chela manus (Fig. 14A-D): proventral and promedian carinae visible as faint ridges with medium-sized spiniform granules, equally developed; prodorsal carina obsolete; dorsomedian carina only visible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, more strongly developed than prodorsal carina; dorsal secondary carina obsolete; digital carina visible as a ridge of small spiniform granules, less distinct in distal area, more developed than retromedian carina; fused retromedian carinae obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules proximally; retrolateral secondary carina vestigial, only distinct proximal to condyle of movable finger, expressed as a ridge of small spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (medium to large granules); ventromedian carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules.

  • Pedipalp macrosculpture: Femur (Fig. 14I-L): prolateral intercarinal surface densely covered with small spiniform granules; dorsal intercarinal surface densely covered with small spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral dorsal intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small spiniform granules; retrolateral ventral intercarinal surface smooth or nearly so, with few small spiniform granules scattered distally; ventral intercarinal surface densely covered with small spiniform granules proximally, smooth distally. Patella (Fig. 14E-H): prolateral intercarinal surface densely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth distally; dorsal intercarinal surface densely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules; retrolateral intercarinal surface with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth distally; ventral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela manus (Fig. 14A-D): prolateral intercarinal surface densely covered with medium to large spiniform granules, smooth proximally; dorsal, retrolateral and ventral intercarinal surfaces densely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules. Chela fingers densely covered with small spiniform granules in proximal half, smooth or nearly so distally, ventral surface smooth; trichobothria dst, dsb and db together in a single large smooth depression.

  • Trichobothria: Pedipalp orthobothriotaxic, accessory trichobothria absent. Patella (Fig. 14E-H): d2 trichobothrium distal to patellar process; five eb trichobothria arranged in two groups (eb1+eb4-5 and eb2-3); two esb, two em and one est trichobothria arranged in three groups, i.e. esb1, esb2+em1-2 and est (esb2 closer to em1-2 than to esb1); three et trichobothria; three v trichobothria. Chela manus (Fig. 14A-D): Dt situated in proximal third of manus; Eb3 close to Eb1-2; Esb aligned with Est; Est situated near midpoint of manus; four V trichobothria, V3 distant from V4. Fixed chela finger with db situated on dorsal surface; esb closer to eb than to est; eb situated at base of finger, proximal to point of articulation between fixed and movable fingers; two i trichobothria.

  • Coxosternum (Fig. 16A, C): Coxa III elongated anterodistally, without anterodistal process. Sternum equilateral pentagonal (anterior width slightly greater than posterior width), slightly wider than long.

  • Legs (Fig. 17): Femora I-IV with ventral surfaces bicarinate, proventral and retroventral carinae granular. Retrolateral margins of tibiae I-II without setiform macrosetae. Basitarsi I-IV: proventral and retroventral rows each with 4/3, 4/4, 4/4 and 3/4 setiform macrosetae. Telotarsi I-IV: proventral and retroventral rows each with 3/4, 4/4, 4/4, 4/4 setiform macrosetae, respectively; retroventral row with 1-3 proximal spinules. Telotarsi I-III: 1-2 ventromedian spinules. Ungues curved, half of telotarsus length or less.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 16A): Composed of two subtriangular sclerites.

  • Pectines (Fig. 16A-B): Moderately elongate, distal edge reaching but not extending beyond distal edge of coxa IV; fulcra and three marginal lamellae present. Pectinal teeth count 7-8; teeth straight, entirely covered with sensory papillae.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 12, 13A, C-D): Pre-tergites I-VII and posterior margins of pre-tergites smooth. Post-tergites: posterior margins of tergites I-VI sublinear, without distinct projection; lateral transversal sulcus present; intercarinal surfaces of I-VII smooth or nearly so medially, sparsely covered with minute granules laterally, posterior third more densely granular; intercarinal surface of VII sparsely covered with minute granules; intercarinal surfaces of III-VII with distinct reticulate network of ridges and dimples. Respiratory stigmata (spiracles) of sternites IV-VI short, their length less than third of sternite width, and distinctly crescent shaped. Sternite VII acarinate.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 18): Not markedly compressed laterally; sparsely and minutely granular, posterior segments less so; dorsal intercarinal surface of V smooth and shiny medially; distinct dorsomedian sulcus on segments I-IV, much less pronounced on segment V (usually only faintly expressed anteriorly).

  • Metasoma carinae: Segments I-IV: dorsolateral carinae obsolete on all segments; lateral median carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); lateral inframedian carinae distinct anteriorly and expressed as a faint ridge on segment I, absent on other segments; ventrolateral carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); pair of ventrosubmedian carinae distinct but weakly developed as low ridges. Segment V: dorsolateral and lateral median carinae obsolete; ventrolateral carinae only expressed as faint ridges; ventrosubmedian carinae fused, only expressed as a faint ridge in anterior two-thirds.

  • Metasoma spination: Segments I-II: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carinae without large spiniform granules. Segments III-IV: dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carinae without large spiniform granules. Segment V: ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae without distinct granules or spines; anal arch faintly crenulate (with sparse and minute granules).

  • Ventral metasoma setation: Segment I with eight macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and one pair (anterior) on ventrolateral carinae; segments II-IV each with ten macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae; segment V with 12 macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and three pairs (anterior, supramedian and posterior) on ventrolateral carinae.

  • Telson (Fig. 18A): Slightly longer than metasoma segment V; vesicle smooth, without granules; aculeus short (less than half of vesicle length), sharply curved.

  • Hemispermatophore (Fig. 19): Stalk slightly longer than stem. Distal lamina curved, without distal crest on anterior margin, markedly narrower than basal part of stalk; single laminar hook situated in basal third of stalk (basal part/distal lamina ratio = 0.4-0.47, median = 0.43); transverse ridge distinct, approximately aligned with base of laminar hook, merging with anterior margin more distally than base of laminar hook. Capsule: hemisolenos thin, folded on itself only proximally and unfolding to flattened distal tip distally (tip and base approximately of same width), without lateral longitudinal carina, laterodistal accessory hook and medioposterior accessory apophysis; tip of hemisolenos more proximal than base of laminar hook, more distal than tip of clasper. Clasper well developed, forming distinct hump, not hook-like, with small lateral knob-like accessory process. Subex well developed, spoon-shaped, merging anteriorly with base of clasper; posterior edge forming obtuse angle (>90°) with hemisolenos; anterior edge forming right angle (90°) with hemisolenos.

  • Description of adult female: Female unknown.

  • Distribution: Hormurus araiaspathe sp. nov. is known from only one locality in the eastern part of New Britain Island, Bismarck Archipelago, off the northeastern coast of New Guinea (Fig. 20).

  • Table 1.

    Hormurus araiaspathe sp. nov., measurements (in mm), repository and inventory number of the adult male holotype.

    img-z20-14_01.gif

    Fig. 12.

    Hormurus araiaspathe sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP4340]). (A) Habitus, dorsal view. (B) Habitus, ventral view. Scale line: 10 mm.

    img-z21-6_01.jpg

    Fig. 13.

    Hormurus araiaspathe sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP4340]), dorsal view. (A) Carapace and mesosomal tergites showing ornamentation and macrosculpture of cuticle. (B) Detailed view of carapace. (C) Detailed view of tergite V. (D) Detailed view of tergite VII. Scale lines: 5 mm (A), 2 mm (B-D).

    img-z22-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 14.

    Hormurus araiaspathe sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP4340]), pedipalp chela (A-D), patella (E-H), femur and trochanter (I-L). Dorsal (A, E, I), retrolateral (B, F, J), ventral (C, G, K) and prolateral (D, H, L) aspects showing trichobothria pattern. Scale line: 5 mm.

    img-z23-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 15.

    Hormurus araiaspathe sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP4340]), left pedipalp chela. (A) Retrolateral aspect showing dentate margin of chela fingers. (B) Dorsal aspect showing dentate margin of movable finger. (C) Ventral aspect showing dentate margin of fixed finger. Abbreviations: blf (basal lobe of fixed finger), bnm (basal notch of movable finger), mlf (median lobe of fixed finger), slm (suprabasal lobe of movable finger), snf (suprabasal notch of fixed finger). Scale lines: 2 mm.

    img-z24-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 16.

    Hormurus araiaspathe sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP4340]), ventral view. (A) Coxae II-IV, sternum, genital operculum and pectines. (B) Left pecten under UV light. (C) Anterior margin of coxae III. Scale lines: 2 mm.

    img-A2qk_01.jpg

    Fig. 17.

    Hormurus araiaspathe sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP4340]), right tarsi, ventral (A-D) and retrolateral (E) aspects. (A) Tarsus I. (B) Tarsus II. (C) Tarsus III. (D-E) Tarsus IV. Abbreviation: vms (ventromedian spinules). Scale line: 2 mm.

    img-z26-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 18.

    Hormurus araiaspathe sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP4340]). (A) Metasoma and telson, lateral aspect. (B) Same, ventral aspect. (C) Lateral view of posterior part of segment V showing weak spinules on anal arch. Scale lines: 5 mm (A-B; C not to scale).

    img-z28-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 19.

    Hormurus araiaspathe sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP4340]), left hemispermatophore. (A) Lateral aspect. (B) Anterior aspect. (C) Rotated approximately 45° counter-clockwise from anterior aspect. (D) Contralateral aspect. Abbreviations: ap (accessory process), cl (clasper), hs (hemisolenos), lh (laminar hook), tr (transverse ridge), s (subex). Scale line: 2 mm.

    img-z29-5_01.jpg

    Fig. 20.

    Known locality of Hormurus araiaspathe sp. nov. in the eastern part of New Britain Island, Bismarck Archipelago, off the northeastern coast of New Guinea. Color gradient indicates topography and bathymetry.

    img-z30-1_01.jpg

    Hormurus barai Monod, Iova & Prendini, sp. nov.
    Figs 4A, 5A, 21-30, 113C, Tab. 2

  • This species was treated under the manuscript name “Hormurus aethes” in Monod, 2011a (280, 531, 536, figs 15D, 29D, 35C, 38D).

  • Material: AMNH [LP 3001]; ♂ holotype; Papua New Guinea, Central Province, Mount Obree, slope S of camp 1, 1600 m; 3.II.2004; leg. J.D. Slapcinsky & F. Kraus – UMMZ [LP 3001]; 1 ♂ paratype; same data as for holotype. – AMNH [LP 2999]; 1 ♂ paratype; Mt Obree, W slope, Fenu 2, 1560 m; 31.I.2004; leg. F. Kraus – AMNH [LP 3000]; 1 ♂ paratype; Papua New Guinea, Central Province, Mt Obree, W slope, Fenu 2, 1560 m; 3.II.2004; leg. F. Kraus – AMNH [LP 3002]; 3 ♀ paratypes; same data as for holotype; 6.II.2004, leg. J.D. Slapcinsky & F. Kraus – AMNH [LP 3003]; 1 ♀ paratype; same data as for holotype; 31.I.2004; leg. J.D. Slapcinsky & F. Kraus – AMNH [LP 3004]; 1 ♀paratype; Mt Obree, ridge W of camp 1, 1550-1640 m; 4.II.2004; leg. J.D. Slapcinsky & F. Kraus – UMMZ [LP 3005]; 1 ♀, 2 juvenile paratypes; Mt Obree, pond about 200 m S of camp 2; 7.II.2004; leg. F. Kraus & J.D. Slapcinsky – MHNG-ARTO-26552; 1 ♀ paratype; Mt Obree, 1870 m, under logs, 9.45°S, 148.00°E; VIII.2019; leg. B. Iova.

  • Etymology: The Barai are Papuan people living on the north-western slopes of Mount Obree where the type specimens were collected. The Barai are part of the larger Koiari tribe (Dutton, 1969, 1973). The epithet is an invariable name in apposition.

  • Diagnosis: Hormurus barai sp. nov. differs from other Papuan Hormurus by the following combination of characters. The species lacks a basal lobe on the fixed chela finger of males (Fig. 25A) which is present in all other species; the dorsal intercarinal surfaces of the patella and chela are covered with much smaller granules (Fig. 24A-B, F-G) than in other species; H. barai sp. nov. also possesses a very weak patellar process without a medially located apex (Figs 21-22, 24F-G, I), like in H. araiaspathe sp. nov. (Figs 12, 14E, G) and H. oyatabu sp. nov. (Figs 40, 42F-G, I), whereas all other Papuan species have a more strongly developed patellar process with a medially located pointed apex. The Esb trichobothrium on the pedipalp chela is located midway between the Eb group and Est (Fig. 24C), whereas it is closer to Est in the other species; the anterior margin of coxa III in males (Fig. 26A, C) is not as elongated distally as in the other species; pectines have two marginal lamellae (Fig. 26A-B, D-E), compared to three in other taxa; respiratory stigmata (spiracles) of sternites IV-VI are round/oval (Fig. 22B, D), whereas they are distinctly crescent-shaped in the other species; the ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae of metasoma segment V bear few strong spiniform granules (Fig. 28), whereas they bear no or only minutes granules in the other taxa; the anal arch of metasoma segment V is equiped with strong conical teeth (Fig. 28), whereas it is crenulate with less developed teeth in other species; metasoma segments II-IV have eight ventral macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on the ventrosubmedian carinae and one pair (anterior) on the lateral carinae (Fig. 28C), whereas they possess ten or more macrosetae in the other species.

  • Description of adult male (holotype): Colouration (Figs 21, 22A-B): Dorsal surface of chelicera manus yellow to orange with darker infuscation, more pronounced anteriorly; fingers light brown. Carapace reddish brown, median ocular region black. Tergites brown. Pedipalps reddish brown; carinae and fingers black. Legs paler than tergites, orange to yellow, distal segments (tibiae, basitarsi and telotarsi) paler; dorsal surface with brown infuscation, more pronounced proximally, absent on telotarsi; prolateral carina of femora dark brown. Coxapophyses and coxae I-II orange to brown; coxae III-IV yellow with black anterior margin; sternum yellow to light brown; genital operculum and pectines pale yellow. Sternite III pale yellow; sternites IV-VI yellow with brown lateral margins, these dark areas becoming more distinct and covering more surface on most posterior segments; posterior half of sternite V markedly paler than anterior half; sternite VII dark brown with lighter spots anteriorly. Metasoma light reddish brown with darker infuscation; telson paler than metasoma, vesicle orange, aculeus reddish brown.

  • Cuticle: Nongranular surfaces of carapace, pedipalps, legs, mesosoma and metasoma finely punctate.

  • Carapace (Fig. 23A, C): Anterior margin with median notch moderately excavated. Anterior furcated sutures distinct. Median ocular tubercle slightly raised; median ocelli present, at least twice the size of lateral ocelli, separated from each other by more than their diameter. Three pairs of lateral ocelli, equal in size, equidistant and adjacent to each other. Surfaces minutely and densely granular, except for smooth anterior areas of frontal lobes and median ocular area.

  • Chelicerae: Basal and median teeth of fixed finger fused into bicusp. Dorsal margin of movable finger with four teeth (one basal, one median, one subdistal and one distal); dorsal distal tooth smaller than ventral distal tooth; ventral margin smooth.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 21, 22A-B, 24B-E, G-J, L-O): Segments rather short and stout, with femur length approximately equal to that of carapace. Chela almost asetose.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 25A, C-D): Fixed finger: basal lobe absent; suprabasal notch distinct and deep; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to median lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent on suprabasal notch and basally. Movable finger: basal lobe absent; suprabasal lobe well developed, conical, gently rounded dorsally and lacking sharp conical tooth, not overlapping with fixed finger; suprabasal lobe and corresponding notch on fixed finger with distinct proximal gap; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to suprabasal lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent on basal notch; few sparse denticles basally.

  • Pedipalp carinae: Femur (Fig. 24L-O): proventral carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; promedian carinae absent; prodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, similarly developed as proventral carina; retrodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, similarly developed as prodorsal carina; retroventral carina visible as a ridge of medium to large spiniform granules, similarly developed as retrodorsal carina; ventromedian carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules. Patella (Fig. 24G-J): proventral carina visible as costate-granular ridge proximally, obsolete distally; promedian and prodorsal carinae visible as ridges with medium to large spiniform granules, equally developed, fused medially into low spiniform process without medially located apex; dorsomedian carina only visible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retrodorsal carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of small to medium-sized spiniform granules; paired retromedian carinae fused and visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of large granules). Chela manus (Fig. 24B-E): proventral carina visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, more strongly developed than promedian carina; promedian carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of small granules; prodorsal carina obsolete; dorsomedian carina visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, more strongly developed than prodorsal carina; dorsal secondary carina absent; digital carina visible as a ridge of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, less distinct in distal area, more developed than retromedian carina; fused retromedian carinae obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules proximally; retrolateral secondary carina vestigial, only discernible proximal to condyle of movable finger as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of large granules); ventromedian carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules.

  • Pedipalp macrosculpture: Femur (Fig. 24L-O): prolateral intercarinal surface densely covered with small spiniform granules; dorsal intercarinal surface densely covered with small spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral dorsal intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules; retrolateral ventral intercarinal surface smooth or nearly so, with few small spiniform granules scattered distally; ventral intercarinal surface densely covered with small spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Patella (Fig. 24G-J): prolateral intercarinal surface densely covered with small spiniform granules; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of small spiniform granules, distal area smooth; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of small spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela manus (Fig. 24B-E): prolateral intercarinal surface covered with dense reticulate network of small spiniform granules, smooth proximally; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of small spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with large anastomosed granules and sparse small spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela fingers densely covered with small spiniform granules in proximal half, smooth or nearly so distally, ventral surface smooth; trichobothria dst, dsb and db separated from each other, each in a small smooth depression.

  • Trichobothria: Pedipalp orthobothriotaxic, accessory trichobothria absent. Patella (Fig. 24G-J): d2 trichobothrium distal to patellar process; five eb trichobothria arranged in two groups (eb1+eb4-5 and eb2-3); two esb, two em and one est trichobotria arranged in three groups, i.e. esb1-2, em1-2 and est (esb2 closer to esb1 than to em1-2); three et trichobothria; three v trichobothria. Chela manus (Fig. 24B-E): Dt situated in proximal third of manus; Eb3 close to Eb1-2; Esb midway between Eb group and Est; Est situated near midpoint of manus; four V trichobothria, V3 distant from V4. Fixed chela finger with db situated on dorsal surface; esb closer to eb than to est; eb situated at base of finger, proximal to point of articulation between fixed and movable fingers; two i trichobothria.

  • Coxosternum (Fig. 26A, C): Coxa III not elongated anterodistally, without anterodistal process. Sternum equilateral pentagonal (anterior width slightly greater than posterior width), wider than long.

  • Legs (Fig. 27): Femora I-IV with ventral surfaces bicarinate, proventral and retroventral carinae granular. Retrolateral margins of tibiae I-II without setiform macrosetae. Basitarsi I-IV: proventral and retroventral rows each with 3/4, 3/4, 4/4 and 4/4 setiform macrosetae, respectively. Telotarsi I-IV: proventral and retroventral rows each with 3-4/4, 3-4/4, 4-5/4-5 and 5/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively; retroventral row with one proximal spinule; ventromedian spinules absent. Ungues curved, half of telotarsus length or less.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 26A): Composed of two subtriangular sclerites.

  • Pectines (Fig. 26A-B): Moderately elongate, distal edge reaching but not extending beyond distal edge of coxa IV; fulcrae and two marginal lamellae present. Pectinal teeth count 5-5; teeth straight, entirely covered with sensory papillae.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 21, 22A-B, 23A, E): Pre-tergites I-VII and posterior margins of pre-tergites smooth. Post-tergites: posterior margins of tergites I-VI sublinear, without distinct projection; lateral transversal sulcus present; intercarinal surfaces of I-VII sparsely covered with minute granules; reticulate network of ridges and dimples indistinct on tergites I-VI, faint on tergite VII. Respiratory stigmata (spiracles) of sternites IV-VI short, their length less than third of sternite width, and round/oval. Sternite VII acarinate.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 28B-C): Not markedly compressed laterally; sparsely and minutely granular, posterior segments less so (segment V almost smooth); dorsal intercarinal surface of V smooth and shiny medially; distinct dorsomedian sulcus on segments I-IV, much less pronounced on segment V (usually only faintly expressed anteriorly).

  • Metasoma carinae: Segments I-IV: dorsolateral carinae obsolete on all segments; lateral median carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); lateral inframedian carinae developed anteriorly as a faint ridge on segment I, absent on other segments; ventrolateral carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); paired ventrosubmedian carinae distinct but weakly developed as low ridges. Segment V: dorsolateral and lateral median carinae obsolete; ventrolateral carinae only expressed as faint ridges; ventrosubmedian carinae fused, only expressed as a faint ridge in anterior two-thirds.

  • Metasoma spination: Segment I: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carinae without large spiniform granules. Segment II: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carinae essentially without large spiniform granules (one weak subposterior spiniform granule sometimes present on one of the ventrosubmedian carinae). Segments III-IV: dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carinae without large spiniform granules. Segment V: ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae with few large spines in posterior half; anal arch with scattered large spines.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: Segments I-IV each with eight macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and one pair (anterior) on ventrolateral carinae; segment V with 12 macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median/supramedian and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and three pairs (anterior, supramedian and posterior) on ventrolateral carinae.

  • Telson (Fig. 28B): Slightly longer than metasoma segment V; vesicle smooth, without granules; aculeus short (less than half of vesicle length), sharply curved.

  • Hemispermatophore (Fig. 29): Stalk longer than stem. Distal lamina curved, without distal crest on anterior margin; single laminar hook situated in basal third of stalk (basal part/distal lamina ratio = 0.34-0.35, median = 0.34); transverse ridge distinct, approximately aligned with base of laminar hook, merging with anterior margin more distally than base of laminar hook. Capsule: hemisolenos thin, folded on itself only proximally and unfolding to flattened distal tip distally (tip and base approximately of same width), without lateral longitudinal carina, laterodistal accessory hook or medioposterior accessory apophysis; tip of hemisolenos more proximal than base of laminar hook, more distal than tip of clasper. Clasper well developed, forming distinct hump, not hook-like, with small anterior knob-like accessory process. Subex well developed, spoon-shaped, anteriorly merging with base of clasper; posterior edge forming obtuse angle (>90°) with hemisolenos; anterior edge forming right angle (90°) with hemisolenos.

  • Description of adult female: Same characters as in male except as follows. Colouration (Fig. 22C-D): Legs and telson slightly darker than in male.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 22C-D, 24A, F, K): Segments not markedly shorter than in male, but patella and chela slightly more robust.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 25B): Dentate margins linear or nearly so, without pronounced lobe and notch, with two rows of primary denticles extending from tip to base of fingers and bearing large inner accessory denticles.

  • Carapace (Fig. 23B, D): Posteromedian margin smooth.

  • Coxosternum (Fig. 26D, F): Anterior margin of coxa III slightly elongated anterodistally.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 26D): Oval to semi-oval, distinctly wider than long (length/width ratio = 0.54-0.62, median = 0.58); opercular sclerites fused, with distinct median suture; posterior notch present, at least weakly developed.

  • Pectines (Fig. 26D-E): Short, distal edge not reaching distal edge of coxa IV. Pectinal teeth count 4-4; teeth short and straight, sensory papillae covering only distal third.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 22C-D, 23B, F): Anterior half of intercarinal surfaces of post-tergites I-VII smooth, posterior half sparsely covered with minute granules.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 28A, D-G): Notably thicker and slightly less granular than in male. Ventrosubmedian carinae of metasoma segment II with 0-1 pairs of strong, subposterior spiniform granules.

  • Intraspecific variation: Pedipalp trichobothria: Trichobothria esb, em and est on the retrolateral surface of the patella are exceptionally arranged into four groups (esb1, esb2, em1-2 and est), rather than into three (esb2 apart from esb1).

  • Leg spination: The number of setiform macrosetae varies from three to four proventrally on telotarsi I-II, and from four to five proventrally and retroventrally on telotarsi III.

  • Female genital operculum: The length/width ratio varies between 0.54 and 0.62 (median = 0.58).

  • Pectines: The pectinal teeth count varies from four to five in females.

  • Metasoma: Spination: A subposterior spiniform granule may be expressed on one ventrosubmedian carina of segments I-II in males, and on one or both ventrosubmedian carinae of metasoma segment II in females. An additional supramedian macroseta is expressed on a ventrolateral carina of metasoma segment III in one specimen. Setation appears to be more variable on metasoma segment V than on the other segments.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: The number of macrosetae varies from 12 to 14, with the presence of one to three additional subposterior macrosetae in some specimens (Fig. 28D-G).

  • Hemispermatophore: The basal part/distal lamina ratio varies from 0.34 to 0.35 (median = 0.34).

  • Distribution and ecology: Hormurus barai sp. nov. is only known from, and probably endemic to, the mid-northwestern slopes of Mount Obree (Fig. 30). This mountain is part of the Owen Stanley Range, it culminates at 3080 m and it is known as Ghost Mountain or as Suwemalla in the local dialect. Specimens were collected from under rocks and logs in a primary forest with very large emergent Agathis trees, with an open understorey and with large amounts of leaf litter and deep duff (F. Kraus, pers. comm.).

  • Table 2.

    Hormurus barai sp. nov., measurements (in mm), repositories and inventory numbers of adult males and females.

    img-z31-2_01.gif

    Fig. 21.

    Hormurus barai sp. nov., habitus of male, dorsal aspect; reconstruction based on photographs. Scale line: 5 mm.

    img-A-gX_01.jpg

    Fig. 22.

    Hormurus barai sp. nov., habitus, dorsal (A, C) and ventral (B, D) aspects. (A-B) Male holotype (AMNH [LP3001]). (C-D) Female paratype (AMNH [LP3003]). Scale lines: 10 mm.

    img-z33-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 23.

    Hormurus barai sp. nov., carapace and mesosomal tergites showing ornamentation and macrosculpture of cuticle (A-B), detailed views of carapace (C-D) and of tergite V (E-F), dorsal aspect. (A, C, E) Male holotype (AMNH [LP3001]). (B, D, F) Female paratype (AMNH [LP3003]). Scale lines: 3 mm (A-B), 2 mm (C-F).

    img-z34-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 24.

    Hormurus barai sp. nov., pedipalp chela (A-E), patella (F-J), femur and trochanter (K-O), dorsal (A-B, F-G, K-L), retrolateral (C, H, M), ventral (D, I, N) and prolateral (E, J, O) aspects showing trichobothria pattern. (A, F, K) Female paratype (AMNH [LP3003]). (B-E, G-J, L-O) Male holotype (AMNH [LP3001]). Scale lines: 3 mm.

    img-z36-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 25.

    Hormurus barai sp. nov., left pedipalp chelae, retrolateral aspect showing dentate margin of chela fingers (A-B), dorsal aspect showing dentate margin of movable finger (C), ventral aspect showing dentate margin of fixed finger (D). (A, C-D) Male holotype (AMNH [LP3001]). (B) Female paratype (AMNH [LP3003]). Scale lines: 2 mm.

    img-z37-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 26.

    Hormurus barai sp. nov., coxae II-IV, sternum, genital operculum and pectines, ventral aspect (A, D), left pecten under UV light (B, E), anterior margins of coxae III (C, F). (A-C) Male holotype (AMNH [LP3001]). (D-F) Female paratype (AMNH [LP3003]). Scale lines: 2 mm (A, C-D, F), 1 mm (B, E).

    img-z38-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 27.

    Hormurus barai sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP3001]), right tarsi, ventral (A-D) and retrolateral (E) aspects. (A) Tarsus I. (B) Tarsus II. (C) Tarsus III. (D-E) Tarsus IV. Scale line: 1 mm.

    img-z39-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 28.

    Hormurus barai sp. nov., metasoma and telson, lateral (A-B) and ventral (C) aspect, metasoma segment V, ventral aspect (D-G). (A, F) Female paratype (AMNH [LP3003]). (B-C) Male holotype (AMNH [LP3001]). (D) Female paratype (MHNGARTO-26552). (E) Female paratype (AMNH [LP3004]). (G) Female paratype (AMNH [LP3002]). Additional subposterior macrosetae present in females indicated in white in D-G. Scale lines: 2 mm.

    img-z41-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 29.

    Hormurus barai sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP3001]), left hemispermatophore. (A) Lateral aspect. (B) Anterior aspect. (C) Rotated approximately 45° counter-clockwise from anterior aspect. (D) Contralateral aspect. Scale line: 1 mm.

    img-z42-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 30.

    Known localities of Hormurus barai sp. nov. in the Owen Stanley Range, in the southeastern part of the central mountain chain of Papua New Guinea, Central Province. Color gradient indicates topography and bathymetry.

    img-z43-1_01.jpg

    Hormurus oyawaka Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.
    Figs 31-39, Tab. 3

  • This species was treated under the manuscript name “Hormurus kilkerranicus” (in part) in Monod (2011a: 287, 532, 542).

  • Material: AMNH [LP 2 728]; ♂ holotype; Papua New Guinea, Milne Bay Province, D'Entrecasteaux Islands, Fergusson Island, S slope of Oya Waka, 1100 m, 9.46°S, 150.56°E; 12.VIII.2002; leg. F. Kraus (JS-0641). – AMNH [LP 2728]; 1 ♂, 1 ♀ paratypes; same data as for holotype. – UMMZ [LP 2728]; 1 ♂ paratype; same data as for holotype.

  • Etymology: Oya Waka is the local name of Mount Maybole (1665 m), the second highest peak on Fergusson Island, where the new species was found and to which it is probably endemic. The epithet is an invariable name in apposition.

  • Diagnosis: Hormurus oyawaka sp. nov., H. barai sp. nov. and H. oyatabu sp. nov. share a unique set of characters that differentiate them from other Papuan Hormurus. They possess small pectines with a low number of teeth (5-7 in male and 4-6 in females) (Figs 26A-B, D-E, 35A-B, D-E, 44A-B, D-E), whereas other Papuan species have larger pectines with at least seven teeth in males and at least six in females. A faint reticulate network of ridges and dimples is visible only on the last four mesosomal post-tergites of females of H. oyawaka sp. nov. (Fig. 32B, F), H. barai sp. nov. (Fig. 23B, F) and H. oyatabu sp. nov. (Fig. 41B, F), whereas in females of the other Papuan species this macrosculpture is more pronounced and usually visible on all segments.

  • Hormurus oyawaka sp. nov. and H. oyatabu sp. nov. are very closely related and differ from H. barai sp. nov. by the following combination of characters: (1) a basal lobe is present on the fixed finger of the pedipalp chela of males (Figs 34A, 43A) instead of no basal lobe in H. barai sp. nov. (Fig. 25A); (2) the retrodorsal carina of the pedipalp femur is less developed than the prodorsal and retroventral carinae (Figs 33K-M, 42K-M) as opposed to similarly developed as the prodorsal and retroventral carinae in H. barai sp. nov. (Fig. 24K-M); (3) the ventral intercarinal surface of the pedipalp chela manus is covered by spiniform granules (Figs 33D, 42D) rather than by anastomosed granules in H. barai sp. nov. (Fig. 24D); (4) the proventral rows of basitarsi I-II bear four macrosetae (Figs 36A-B, 45A-B) instead of three in H. barai sp. nov. (Fig. 27A-B); (5) the retroventral rows on basitarsi I-IV bear five macrosetae (Figs 36, 45) instead of four macrosetae in H. barai sp. nov. (Fig. 27); (6) the hemispermatophore clasper lacks an anterior accessory process (Figs 38, 47) rather than possessing a small knob-like process in H. barai sp. nov. (Fig. 29). Moreover, H. oyawaka sp. nov. differs from H. barai sp. nov. and H. oyatabu sp. nov. in the strong development of its prolateral patellar process (Figs 31, 33F-G, I), whereas in the other two species the patellar process is less strongly developed (Figs 21, 22, 24F-G, I, 40, 42F-G, I). A list of additional characters distinguishing H. oyawaka sp. nov. and H. oyatabu sp. nov. is provided in the diagnosis of the latter.

  • Description of adult male (holotype): Colouration (Fig. 31A-B): Dorsal surface of chelicera manus orange with darker infuscation, more pronounced anteriorly; fingers dark brown. Carapace reddish brown, median ocular region black. Tergites brown. Pedipalps reddish brown; carinae and fingers black. Legs paler than tergites, dorsal surface pale brown with darker infuscation except on telotarsi; ventral surface brown to yellow, distal segments (tibiae, basitarsi and telotarsi) paler than proximal ones; prolateral carina of femora black. Coxapophyses I-II dark brown, anterior tip pale yellow; leg coxae brown with orange spots and black anterior margin; sternum dark brown, slightly paler posteriorly; genital operculum and pectines pale yellow. Sternites III-VI dark brown, paler medially; posterior margin of sternite V pale yellow; sternite VII dark brown. Metasoma reddish brown with darker infuscation; telson paler than metasoma, vesicle dark orange, aculeus reddish brown.

  • Cuticle: Nongranular surfaces of carapace, pedipalps, legs, mesosoma and metasoma finely punctate.

  • Carapace (Fig. 32A, C): Anterior margin with median notch moderately excavated. Anterior furcated sutures distinct. Median ocular tubercle slightly raised; median ocelli present, at least twice the size of lateral ocelli, separated from each other by more than the diameter of a median ocellus. Three pairs of lateral ocelli, equal in size, equidistant and adjacent to each other. Surfaces minutely and densely granular, except for smooth anterior areas of frontal lobes and median ocular area.

  • Chelicerae: Basal and median teeth of fixed finger fused into bicusp. Dorsal margin of movable finger with four teeth (one basal, one median, one subdistal and one distal); dorsal distal tooth smaller than ventral distal tooth; ventral margin smooth.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 31A-B, 33B-E, G-J, L-O): Segments moderately elongated, with femur slightly longer than carapace. Chela almost asetose.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 34A, C-D): Fixed finger: basal lobe present and conical; suprabasal notch distinct and deep; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to median lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent on suprabasal notch; few sparse denticles on basal lobe. Movable finger: basal lobe absent; suprabasal lobe well developed, conical, gently rounded dorsally and lacking sharp conical tooth, not overlapping with fixed finger; suprabasal lobe and corresponding notch on fixed finger with distinct proximal gap; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to suprabasal lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent on basal notch; few sparse denticles basally.

  • Pedipalp carinae: Femur (Fig. 33L-O): proventral carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; promedian carinae absent; prodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, these similarly developed as proventral carina; retrodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, slightly less strongly developed than prodorsal carina, more distinct in proximal third of segment; retroventral carina visible as a ridge of medium to large spiniform granules, more developed than retrodorsal carina; ventromedian carina obsolete, only distinct proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules. Patella (Fig. 33G-J): proventral carina discernible as costate-granular ridge proximally, obsolete distally; promedian and prodorsal carinae visible as ridges with medium to large spiniform granules, equally developed, fused medially and forming prominent spiniform process with medially located pointed apex; dorsomedian carina only visible proximally as a ridge of small to medium-sized spiniform granules; retrodorsal carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; paired retromedian carinae fused and visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium-sized granules). Chela manus (Fig. 33B-E): proventral and promedian carinae visible as faint ridges with medium-sized spiniform granules, equally developed; prodorsal carina obsolete; dorsomedian carina visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, more strongly developed than prodorsal carina; dorsal secondary carina obsolete; digital carina visible as a ridge of small spiniform granules, less distinct in distal area, more developed than retromedian carina; fused retromedian carinae obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules proximally; retrolateral secondary carina vestigial, only distinct proximal to condyle of movable finger, expressed as a ridge of small spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium to large granules); ventromedian carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules.

  • Pedipalp macrosculpture: Femur (Fig. 33L-O): prolateral intercarinal surface densely covered with small spiniform granules; dorsal intercarinal surface densely covered with small spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small spiniform granules, smooth proximally; ventral intercarinal surface densely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth distally. Patella (Fig. 33G-J): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, distal half smooth; dorsal intercarinal surface covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral intercarinal surface with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela manus (Fig. 33B-E): prolateral intercarinal surface covered with dense reticulate network of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth proximally; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela fingers densely covered with small spiniform granules in proximal half, smooth or nearly so distally, ventral surface smooth; trichobothria dst, dsb and db each in a small smooth depression.

  • Trichobothria: Pedipalp orthobothriotaxic, accessory trichobothria absent. Patella (Fig. 33G-J): d2 trichobothrium distal to patellar process; five eb trichobothria arranged in two groups (eb1+eb4-5 and eb2-3); two esb, two em and one est trichobotria arranged in three groups, i.e. esb1-2, em1-2 and est (esb2 closer to esb1 than to em1-2); three et trichobothria; three v trichobothria. Chela manus (Fig. 33B-E): Dt situated near midpoint of chela manus; Eb3 close to Eb1-2; Esb closer to Est than to Eb group; Est situated near midpoint; four V trichobothria, V3 distant from V4. Fixed chela finger with db situated on dorsal surface; esb closer to eb than to est; eb situated at base of finger, proximal to point of articulation between fixed and movable fingers; two i trichobothria.

  • Coxosternum (Fig. 35A, C): Coxa III elongated anterodistally, without anterodistal process. Sternum equilateral pentagonal (anterior width slightly greater than posterior width), wider than long.

  • Legs (Fig. 36): Femora I-IV with ventral surfaces bicarinate, pro- and retroventral carinae granular. Retrolateral margins of tibiae I-II without setiform macrosetae. Basitarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral rows each with 4/5, 4/5, 4/5 and 4/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively. Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral rows each with 4/4, 4/4, 5/5 and 5/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively; retroventral row with one proximal spinule; ventromedian spinules absent. Ungues curved, half the length of the telotarsus or less.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 35A, C): Composed of two subtriangular sclerites.

  • Pectines (Fig. 35A-B): Moderately elongated, distal edge reaching but not extending beyond distal edge of coxa IV; fulcrae and three marginal lamellae present. Pectinal teeth count 6-6; teeth straight, entirely covered with sensory papillae.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 31A-B, 32A, E): Pre-tergites I-VII and posterior margins of pre-tergites smooth. Post-tergites: posterior margins of tergites I-VI sublinear, without distinct projection; lateral transversal sulcus present; intercarinal surfaces of I-VII densely covered with small spiniform granules, less so anteromedially; intercarinal surfaces of III-VII with distinct but faint reticulate network of ridges and dimples. Respiratory stigmata (spiracles) of sternites IV-VI short, their length less than third of sternite width, and distinctly crescent shaped. Sternite VII acarinate.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 37B-C): Not markedly compressed laterally; sparsely and minutely granular, posterior segments less so (segment V smooth in some specimens); dorsal intercarinal surface of V smooth and shiny medially; distinct dorsomedian sulcus on segments I-IV, much less pronounced on segment V (usually only faintly expressed anteriorly).

  • Metasoma carinae: Segments I-IV: dorsolateral carinae obsolete on all segments; lateral median carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); lateral inframedian carinae expressed anteriorly as a faint ridge on segment I, absent on other segments; ventrolateral carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); paired ventrosubmedian carinae weakly developed (as low ridges). Segment V: dorsolateral and lateral median carinae obsolete; ventrolateral carinae only expressed as faint ridges; ventrosubmedian carinae fused, only expressed as a faint ridge in anterior two-thirds.

  • Metasoma spination: Segment I: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules. Segment II: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large posterior spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with two pairs of subposterior spiniform granules and one pair of median spiniform granules. Segment III-IV: dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carinae without large spiniform granules. Segment V: ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae without distinct granules or spines; anal arch crenulate. Ventral metasoma setation: Segment I-IV each with ten macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae; segment V with 16 macrosetae, i.e. four pairs (anterior, median, subposterior and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and four pairs (anterior, supramedian, subposterior and posterior) on ventrolateral carinae.

  • Telson (Fig. 37B): Slightly longer than metasoma segment V; vesicle smooth, without granules; aculeus short (less than half of vesicle length), sharply curved. Hemispermatophore (Fig. 38): Stalk and stem approximately equal in size. Distal lamina curved, without distal crest on anterior margin; single laminar hook situated in basal third of stalk (basal part/distal lamina ratio = 0.39-0.43, median = 0.41); transverse ridge distinct, approximately aligned with base of laminar hook, merging with anterior margin more distally than base of laminar hook. Capsule: hemisolenos thin, folded on itself only proximally, distally unfolded towards flattened distal tip (tip and base approximately of same width), without lateral longitudinal carina, laterodistal accessory hook or medioposterior accessory apophysis; tip of hemisolenos more proximal than base of laminar hook, more distal than tip of clasper. Clasper well developed as a distinct hump, not hook-like, without anterior accessory process. Subex well developed, spoon-shaped, merging anteriorly with base of clasper; posterior edge forming obtuse angle (>90°) with hemisolenos; anterior edge forming right angle (90°) with hemisolenos.

  • Description of adult female: Same characters as in male except as follows. Pedipalps (Figs 31C-D, 33A, F, K): Segments slightly shorter or more robust than in male. Prolateral patellar process slightly less developed than in male.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 34B): Dentate margins linear or nearly so, without pronounced lobe and notch, with two rows of primary denticles extending from tip to base of fingers and bearing large inner accessory denticles.

  • Carapace (Fig. 32B, D): Anteromedian surface and frontal lobes smooth, only faintly granular along median longitudinal sulci and anterior furcated sulci; posteromedian margin smooth; other surfaces less granular than in male.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 35D): Oval to semi-oval, distinctly wider than long (length/width ratio = 0.67); opercular sclerites partly fused, with distinct median suture; posterior notch present, at least weakly developed. Pectines (Fig. 35D-E): Short, distal edge not reaching distal edge of coxa IV. Pectinal teeth count 4-5; teeth short and straight, sensory papillae covering only distal half.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 31C-D, 32B, F): Post-tergites: intercarinal surfaces of I-III smooth, faintly granular laterally; intercarinal surfaces of IV-VI entirely smooth; intercarinal surfaces of VII smooth, posterior half sparsely granular.

  • Intraspecific variation: Pedipalp trichobothria: On the retrolateral side of the patella trichobothrium esb2 may be located midway between esb1 and em1-2 rather than grouping with esb1. This results in four (esb1, esb2, em1-2 and est) rather than three (esb1-2, em1-2 and est) groups. On the retrolateral side of the chela manus Esb may be more distal, aligning with Est.

  • Pectines: The pectinal teeth count varies from four to five in females.

  • Metasoma: Spination: one of the ventrosubmedian carinae of segment I may exceptionally contain an additional subposterior spiniform granule, whereas the ventrosubmedian carina of segment II in some specimens possesses one subposterior spiniform granule less than normal (three instead of four subposterior granules on ventrosubmedian carinae in total).

  • Hemispermatophore: The basal part/distal lamina ratio varies from 0.39 to 0.43 (median = 0.41).

  • Distribution and ecology: Hormurus oyawaka sp. nov. was only collected on Fergusson Island, D'Entrecasteaux Archipelago, off the northeastern tip of New Guinea, Milne Bay Province (Fig. 39). The species is probably endemic to Mount Maybole (locally known as Oya Waka), a mountain culminating at 1141 m, as indicated by the presence of H. oyatabu sp. nov., a distinct, closely related species, on Mount Kilkerran, the other peak of Fergusson island, located only 25 km to the east. Both species appear to occur only above 1000 m, whereas H. hypseloscolus sp. nov. is only found below 900 m in altitude.

  • The specimens examined were collected in a small-crowned lowland hill forest (Paijmans, 1975a, b, 1976) on steep terrain, under rocks in a dry streambed. The site receives little direct sunlight because of surrounding ridges and frequent clouds. Although the region had endured a month-long drought when the scorpions were collected, moisture was still present under logs and some rocks (F. Kraus, pers. comm.).

  • Table 3.

    Hormurus oyawaka sp. nov., measurements (in mm), repository and inventory number of adult males and one female.

    img-z44-6_01.gif

    Fig. 31.

    Hormurus oyawaka sp. nov., habitus, dorsal (A, C) and ventral (B, D) aspects. (A-B) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2728]). (C-D) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2728]). Scale lines: 10 mm.

    img-z46-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 32.

    Hormurus oyawaka sp. nov., carapace and mesosomal tergites showing ornamentation and macrosculpture of cuticle (A-B), detailed views of carapace (C-D) and tergite V (E-F), dorsal aspects. (A, C, E) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2728]). (B, D, F) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2728]). Scale lines: 5 mm (A-B), 2 mm (C-F).

    img-z47-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 33.

    Hormurus oyawaka sp. nov., pedipalp chela (A-E), patella (F-J), femur and trochanter (K-O), dorsal (A-B, F-G, K-L), retrolateral (C, H, M), ventral (D, I, N) and prolateral (E, J, O) aspects showing trichobothria pattern. (A, F, K) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2728]). (B-E, G-J, L-O) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2728]). Scale lines: 3 mm.

    img-z48-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 34.

    Hormurus oyawaka sp. nov., left pedipalp chelae, retrolateral aspect showing dentate margin of chela fingers (A-B), dorsal aspect showing dentate margin of movable finger (C), ventral aspect showing dentate margin of fixed finger (D). (A, C-D) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2728]). (B) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2728]). Scale lines: 2 mm.

    img-z49-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 35.

    Hormurus oyawaka sp. nov., coxae II-IV, sternum, genital operculum and pectines, ventral aspect (A, D), left pecten under UV light (B, E), anterior margin of coxae III (C, F). (A-C) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2728]). (D-F) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2728]). Scale lines: 2 mm (A, D), 1 mm (B-C, E-F).

    img-z51-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 36.

    Hormurus oyawaka sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP2728]), right tarsi, ventral (A-D) and retrolateral (E) aspects. (A) Tarsus I. (B) Tarsus II. (C) Tarsus III. (D-E) Tarsus IV. Scale line: 2 mm.

    img-z52-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 37.

    Hormurus oyawaka sp. nov., metasoma and telson, lateral (A-B) and ventral (C) aspects. (A) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2728]). (B-C) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2728]). Scale lines: 3 mm.

    img-z53-3_01.jpg

    Fig. 38.

    Hormurus oyawaka sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP2728]), left hemispermatophore. (A) Lateral aspect. (B) Anterior aspect. (C) Rotated approximately 45° counter-clockwise from anterior aspect. (D) Contralateral aspect. Scale line: 1 mm.

    img-z54-9_01.jpg

    Fig. 39.

    Known localities of Hormurus oyawaka sp. nov. on Fergusson Island, D'Entrecasteaux Archipelago, off the northeastern tip of New Guinea, Milne Bay Province. Color gradient indicates topography and bathymetry.

    img-z55-1_01.jpg

    Hormurus oyatabu Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.
    Figs 4E, 40-48, Tab. 4

  • This species was treated under the manuscript name “Hormurus kilkerranicus” (part) in Monod (2011a: 287, 532, 542).

  • Material: AMNH [LP 2719]; ♂ holotype; Papua New Guinea, Milne Bay Province, D'Entrecasteaux Islands, Fergusson Island, NE slope of Mount Kilkerran, 1100 m, 9.46°S, 150.78E; 21.VIII.2002; leg. F. Kraus. – AMNH [LP 2719]; 7 ♂ paratypes; same data as for holotype. – AMNH [LP 2720]; 8 ♀ paratypes; same data as for holotype; 19.VIII.2002; leg. F. Kraus. – UMMZ [LP 2722]; 3 subadult ♂, 3 subadult ♀ paratypes; same data as for holotype; 19.VIII.2002; leg. F. Kraus. – AMNH [LP 2723]; 3 juvenile ♀ paratypes; same data as for holotype but at 1000 m; 21.VIII.2002; leg. F. Kraus. – AMNH [LP 2732]; 6 ♀ paratypes; same data as for holotype; 19.VIII.2002; leg. F. Kraus.

  • Etymology: Oya Tabu is the local name of the Kilkerran Massif, which includes the highest peak on Fergusson Island (1947 m). The epithet is an invariable name in apposition.

  • Diagnosis: Hormurus oyatabu sp. nov. is closely related to H. oyawaka sp. nov. but differs in the following combination of characters: the patellar process is less strongly developed (Figs 40, 42F-G, I) than in H. oyawaka sp. nov. (Figs 31, 33F-G, I); the prolateral outline of the male pedipalp chela has two distinct angles (Fig. 42B) instead of forming a regular curve (Fig. 33B); the basal lobe of the fixed chela finger of males is weaker (Fig. 43A) than in H. oyawaka sp. nov. (Fig. 34A); the telson is slightly more slender and elongated (Fig. 46A-B) than in H. oyawaka sp. nov. (Fig. 37A-B).

  • Description of adult male (holotype): Colouration (Fig. 40A-B): Dorsal surface of chelicera manus orange with darker infuscation, more pronounced anteriorly; fingers dark brown. Carapace reddish brown, median ocular region black. Tergites brown. Pedipalps reddish brown; carinae and fingers black. Legs paler than tergites, dorsal surface pale brown to orange with darker infuscation except on telotarsi; ventral surface brown to yellow, distal segments (tibiae, basitarsi and telotarsi) paler than basal ones; prolateral carina of femora black. Coxapophyses I-II dark brown, anterior tip pale yellow; leg coxae brown with orange spots and black anterior margin; sternum dark brown, slightly paler posteriorly than anteriorly; genital operculum and pectines pale yellow. Sternites III-V brown, their posterior half pale yellow; sternite VI darker than other sternites, posterior half slightly paler than anterior half; sternite VII dark brown. Metasoma reddish brown with darker infuscation; telson paler than metasoma, vesicle dark orange, aculeus reddish brown.

  • Cuticle: Nongranular surfaces of carapace, pedipalps, legs, mesosoma and metasoma finely punctate.

  • Carapace (Fig. 41A, C): Anterior margin with median notch moderately excavated. Anterior furcated sutures distinct. Median ocular tubercle slightly raised; median ocelli present, at least twice the size of lateral ocelli, separated from each other by more than the diameter of a median ocellus. Three pairs of lateral ocelli, equal in size, equidistant and adjacent to each other. Surfaces minutely and densely granular, except for smooth anterior areas of frontal lobes and median ocular area.

  • Chelicerae: Basal and median teeth of fixed finger fused into bicusp. Dorsal margin of movable finger with four teeth (one basal, one median, one subdistal and one distal); dorsal distal tooth smaller than ventral distal tooth; ventral margin smooth.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 40A-B, 42B-E, G-J, L-O): Segments moderately elongated, with femur slightly longer than carapace. Chela almost asetose.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 43A, C-D): Fixed finger: basal lobe present but weakly developed; suprabasal notch distinct and deep; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to median lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent on suprabasal notch; single row of sparse denticles on basal lobe. Movable finger: basal lobe absent; suprabasal lobe well developed, conical, gently rounded dorsally and lacking sharp conical tooth, not overlapping with fixed finger; suprabasal lobe and corresponding notch on fixed finger with distinct proximal gap; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to suprabasal lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent on basal notch; few sparse denticles basally.

  • Pedipalp carinae: Femur (Fig. 42L-O): proventral carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; promedian carinae absent; prodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, similarly developed as proventral carina; retrodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, slightly less developed than prodorsal carina, more distinct in proximal third of segment; retroventral carina visible as a ridge of medium to large spiniform granules, more developed than retrodorsal carina; ventromedian carina obsolete, only discernible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules. Patella (Fig. 42G-J): proventral carina discernible as costate-granular ridge proximally, obsolete distally; promedian and prodorsal carinae visible as ridges with medium to large spiniform granules, equally developed, fused medially into low spiniform process lacking medially located pointed apex; dorsomedian carina only visible proximally as a ridge of small to medium-sized spiniform granules; retrodorsal carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; paired retromedian carinae fused and visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium-sized granules). Chela manus (Fig. 42B-E): proventral and promedian carinae visible as faint ridges with medium-sized spiniform granules, equally developed; prodorsal carina obsolete; dorsomedian carina visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, more strongly developed than prodorsal carina; dorsal secondary carina obsolete; digital carina visible as a ridge of small spiniform granules, less distinct in distal area, more developed than retromedian carina; fused retromedian carinae obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules proximally; retrolateral secondary carina vestigial, only discernible proximal to condyle of movable finger as a ridge of small spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium to large granules); ventromedian carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules. Pedipalp macrosculpture: Femur (Fig. 42L-O): prolateral intercarinal surface densely covered with small spiniform granules; dorsal intercarinal surface densely covered with small spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small spiniform granules, smooth proximally; ventral intercarinal surface densely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth distally. Patella (Fig. 42G-J): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small spiniform granules, distal half smooth; dorsal intercarinal surface covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral intercarinal surface with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela manus (Fig. 42B-E): prolateral intercarinal surface covered with dense reticulate network of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth proximally; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela fingers densely covered with small spiniform granules in proximal half, smooth or nearly so distally, ventral surface smooth; trichobothria dst, dsb and db each in a small smooth depression.

  • Trichobothria: Pedipalp orthobothriotaxic, accessory trichobothria absent. Patella (Fig. 42G-J): d2 trichobothrium distal to patellar process; five eb trichobothria arranged in two groups (eb1+eb4-5 and eb2-3); two esb, two em and one est trichobothria arranged in four groups (esb1, esb2, em1-2 and est); three et trichobothria; three v trichobothria. Chela manus (Fig. 42B-E): Dt situated in proximal third of manus; Eb3 close to Eb1-2; Esb closer to Est than to Eb group; Est situated near midpoint of manus; four V trichobothria, V3 distant from V4. Fixed chela finger with db situated on dorsal surface; esb closer to eb than to est; eb situated at base of finger, proximal to point of articulation between fixed and movable fingers; two i trichobothria.

  • Coxosternum (Fig. 44A, C): Coxa III elongated anterodistally, without anterodistal process. Sternum equilateral pentagonal (anterior width slightly greater than posterior width), wider than long.

  • Legs (Fig. 45): Femora I-IV with ventral surfaces bicarinate, pro- and retroventral carinae granular. Retrolateral margins of tibiae I-II without setiform macrosetae. Basitarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral rows each with 4/5, 4/5, 4/5 and 4/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively. Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral row each with 4/4, 4/4, 5/5 and 5/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively; retroventral row with one proximal spinule; ventromedian spinules absent. Ungues curved, shorter than telotarsus, half its length or less.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 44A): Composed of two subtriangular sclerites.

  • Pectines (Fig. 44A-B): Moderately elongated, distal edge reaching but not extending beyond distal edge of coxa IV; fulcrae and three marginal lamellae present. Pectinal teeth count 6-7; teeth straight, entirely covered with sensory papillae.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 40A-B, 41A, E): Pre-tergites I-VII and posterior margins smooth. Post-tergites: posterior margins of tergites I-VI sublinear, without distinct projection; lateral transversal sulcus present; intercarinal surfaces of I-VII densely covered with small spiniform granules, less so anteromedially; intercarinal surfaces of III-VII with distinct but faint reticulate network of ridges and dimples. Respiratory stigmata (spiracles) of sternites IV-VI short, their length less than third of sternite width, and distinctly crescent shaped. Sternite VII acarinate.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 46B-C): Not markedly compressed laterally; sparsely and minutely granular, posterior segments less so (segment V smooth in some specimens); dorsal intercarinal surface of segment V smooth and shiny medially; distinct dorsomedian sulcus on segments I-IV, much less pronounced on segment V than on other segments (usually only faintly expressed anteriorly).

  • Metasoma carinae: Segments I-IV: dorsolateral carinae obsolete on all segments; lateral median carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); lateral inframedian carinae anteriorly discernible as a faint ridge on segment I, absent on other segments; ventrolateral carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); paired ventrosubmedian carinae weakly developed (as low ridges). Segment V: dorsolateral and lateral median carinae obsolete; ventrolateral carinae only expressed as faint ridges; ventrosubmedian carinae fused, only expressed as a faint ridge in anterior two-thirds.

  • Metasoma spination: Segment I: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with 1-2 pairs of subposterior spiniform granules and rarely one pair of median spiniform granules. Segment II: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large posterior spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with 1-3 pairs of posterior spiniform granules and 0-2 pairs of median spiniform granules. Segments III-IV: dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carinae without large spiniform granules. Segment V: ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae without distinct granules or spines; anal arch crenulate.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: Segments I-IV each with ten macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae; segment V with 16 macrosetae, i.e. four pairs (anterior, median, subposterior and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and four pairs (anterior, supramedian, subposterior and posterior) on ventrolateral carinae.

  • Telson (Fig. 46B): Slightly longer than metasoma segment V; vesicle smooth, without granules; aculeus short (less than half of vesicle length), sharply curved. Hemispermatophore (Fig. 47): Stalk and stem approximately equal in size. Distal lamina curved, without distal crest on anterior margin; single laminar hook situated in basal third of stalk (basal part/distal lamina ratio = 0.39-0.58, median = 0.49); transverse ridge distinct, approximately aligned with base of laminar hook, merging with anterior margin more distally than base of laminar hook. Capsule: hemisolenos thin, folded on itself only proximally, above that unfolded to a flattened distal area (tip and base approximately of same width), without lateral longitudinal carina, laterodistal accessory hook or medioposterior accessory apophysis; tip of hemisolenos more proximal than base of laminar hook, more distal than tip of clasper. Clasper well developed, forming distinct hump, not hook-like, without anterior accessory process. Subex well developed, spoon-shaped, merging anteriorly with base of clasper; posterior edge forming obtuse angle (>90°) with hemisolenos; anterior edge forming right angle (90°) with hemisolenos.

  • Description of adult female: Same characters as for male except as follows. Pedipalps (Figs 40C-D, 42A, F, K): Segments slightly shorter or more robust than in male.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 43B): Dentate margins linear or nearly so, without pronounced lobe and notch, with two rows of primary denticles extending from tip to base of fingers and bearing large inner accessory denticles.

  • Carapace (Fig. 41B, D): Anteromedian surface and frontal lobes smooth, only faintly granular along median longitudinal sulci and anterior furcated sulci; posteromedian margin smooth; other surfaces less granular than in male.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 44D): Oval to semi-oval, distinctly wider than long (length/width ratio = 0.66-0.81, median = 0.74); opercular sclerites partly fused, with distinct median suture; posterior notch present, at least weakly developed.

  • Pectines (Fig. 44D-E): Short, distal edge not reaching distal edge of coxa IV. Pectinal teeth count 4-6; teeth short and straight, sensory papillae covering only distal half.

  • Mesosoma (Fig. 40C-D, 41B, F): Post-tergites: intercarinal surfaces of I-III smooth, faintly granular laterally; intercarinal surfaces of IV-VI entirely smooth; intercarinal surfaces of VII smooth, posterior half with sparse granules laterally.

  • Intraspecific variation: Pedipalp trichobothria: On the retrolateral side of the patella trichobotria esb, em and est may be arranged in three groups instead of four, i.e. esb1-2, em1-2 and est (esb1 closer to esb2). On the retrolateral side of the pedipalp chela of some specimens Esb is more distal than in others, aligning with Est.

  • Leg spination: The number of setiform macrosetae varies from three to four in the proventral rows of telotarsi II-III, and from four to five in the retroventral row of telotarsi III-IV.

  • Female genital operculum: The length/width ratio varies from 0.66 to 0.81 (median = 0.74).

  • Pectines: The pectinal teeth count varies from five to seven in males and from four to six in females.

  • Metasoma: Spination: 1-2 pairs of subposterior spiniform granules and 0-1 pair of median spiniform granules are present on the ventrosubmedian carinae of segment I. Similarly, the ventrosubmedian carinae of segment II possess 1-3 pairs of posterior spiniform granules and 0-2 pairs of median spiniform granules. For each segment one granule more or one granule less may be expressed in each group of granules.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: Segments I-IV may bear eight or nine macrosetae instead of ten, and segment V 15 instead of 16 due to the non-expression of one or two macrosetae.

  • Hemispermatophore: The basal part/distal lamina ratio varies from 0.39 to 0.58 (median = 0.49).

  • Distribution and ecology: Hormurus oyatabu sp. nov. is probably endemic to Mount Kilkerran, the highest peak of Fergusson island, D'Entrecasteaux Archipelago, off the northeastern tip of New Guinea, Milne Bay Province (Fig. 48; see description of H. oyawaka sp. nov. for details). The specimens were collected in a habitat very similar to that of H. oyawaka sp. nov., i.e. under the rocks of a dry streambed (with moisture still present under logs and rocks) in a small-crowned lowland hill forest (Paijmans, 1975a, b, 1976) on steep terrain (F. Kraus, pers. comm.).

  • Table 4.

    Hormurus oyatabu sp. nov., measurements (in mm), repository and inventory numbers of adult males and females.

    img-z57-2_01.gif

    (continued).

    img-z58-2_01.gif

    (continued).

    img-z59-2_01.gif

    Fig. 40.

    Hormurus oyatabu sp. nov., habitus, dorsal (A, C) and ventral (B, D) aspects. (A-B) Male paratype (AMNH [LP2719]). (C-D) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2732]). Scale lines: 10 mm.

    img-z60-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 41.

    Hormurus oyatabu sp. nov., carapace and mesosomal tergites showing ornamentation and macrosculpture of cuticle (A-B), detailed views of carapace (C-D) and of tergite V (E-F), dorsal aspect. (A, C, E) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2719]). (B, D, F) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2732]). Scale lines: 4 mm (A-B), 2 mm (C-F).

    img-z61-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 42.

    Hormurus oyatabu sp. nov., pedipalp chela (A-E), patella (F-J), femur and trochanter (K-O), dorsal (A-B, F-G, K-L), retrolateral (C, H, M), ventral (D, I, N) and prolateral (E, J, O) aspects showing trichobothria pattern. (A, F, K) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2732]). (B-E, G-J, L-O) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2719]). Scale lines: 3 mm.

    img-z62-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 43.

    Hormurus oyatabu sp. nov., left pedipalp chelae, retrolateral aspect showing dentate margin of chela fingers (A-B), dorsal aspect showing dentate margin of movable finger (C), ventral aspect showing dentate margin of fixed finger (D). (A, C-D) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2719]). (B) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2732]). Scale lines: 2 mm.

    img-z64-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 44.

    Hormurus oyatabu sp. nov., coxae II-IV, sternum, genital operculum and pectines, ventral aspect (A, D), left pecten under UV light (B, E), anterior margin of coxae III (C, F). (A-C) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2719]). (D-F) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2732]). Scale lines: 2 mm (A, D), 1 mm (B-C, E-F).

    img-z65-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 45.

    Hormurus oyatabu sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP2719]), right tarsi, ventral (A-D) and retrolateral (E) aspects. (A) Tarsus I. (B) Tarsus II. (C) Tarsus III. (D-E) Tarsus IV. Scale line: 2 mm.

    img-z66-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 46.

    Hormurus oyatabu sp. nov., metasoma and telson, lateral (A-B) and ventral (C) aspects. (A) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2732]). (B-C) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2719]). Scale lines: 3 mm.

    img-z67-6_01.jpg

    Fig. 47.

    Hormurus oyatabu sp. nov., left hemispermatophore of male holotype (AMNH [LP2719]) (A-D) and of male paratype (AMNH [LP2719]) (E-H). (A, E) Lateral aspect. (B, F) Anterior aspect. (C, G) Rotated approximately 45° counter-clockwise from anterior aspect. (D, H) Contralateral aspect. Scale lines: 1 mm.

    img-z68-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 48.

    Known locality of Hormurus oyatabu sp. nov. on Fergusson Island, D'Entrecasteaux Archipelago, off the northeastern tip of New Guinea, Milne Bay Province. Color gradient indicates topography and bathymetry.

    img-z69-11_01.jpg

    Hormurus muyua Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.
    Figs 49-58, Tab. 5

  • Material: AMNH [LP 4741]; ♂ holotype; Papua New Guinea, Milne Bay Province, Woodlark Island, 1 km N of Guasopa, 30 m, disturbed rainforest on limestone, 9.21°S, 152.94°E; 24.I.2003; leg. J.D. Slapcinsky (JS-0591). – AMNH [LP 4741]; 1 ♂, 2 ♀ paratypes; same data as for holotype. – UMMZ [LP 4741]; 1 subadult ♂, 1 juvenile ♂, 1 juvenile ♀ paratypes; same data as for holotype.

  • Etymology: In the regional dialect, Muyua is the name of Woodlark Island where the type specimens were collected. The epithet is an invariable name in apposition.

  • Diagnosis: Hormurus muyua sp. nov. and H. slapcinskyi sp. nov. can be distinguished from the other Papuan congeners by the position of the hemispermatophore lamellar hook and the shape of the female genital operculum. Among the species with a subdistal hemispermatophore lamellar hook (situated between 1/3 and 3/7 from the base of the stalk; basal part/distal lamina ratio > 0.5 and < 0.75), H. muyua sp. nov. and H. slapcinskyi sp. nov. are the only species in which the female genital operculum is distinctly wider than long (length/width ratio < 0.85).

  • Hormurus muyua sp. nov. differs from H. slapcinskyi sp. nov. in the following characters: (1) the carapace and tergite surfaces in H. muyua sp. nov. (Fig. 51) are slightly less granular than in H. slapcinskyi sp. nov. (Fig. 60); (2) the pedipalp segments in H. muyua sp. nov. (Fig. 52) are higher and less elongated than in H. slapcinskyi sp. nov. (Fig. 61); (3) the retrodorsal carina of the pedipalp femur is slightly less developed than the prodorsal and retroventral carinae in H. muyua sp. nov. (Fig. 52K-M), whereas it is markedly less developed than the prodorsal and retroventral carinae in H. slapcinskyi sp. nov. (Fig. 61K-M); (4) metasoma segment I bears eight macrosetae in males of H. muyua sp. nov. (Fig. 56C) instead of ten in the male of H. slapcinskyi sp. nov. (Fig. 65C); (5) the hemispermatophore distal lamina in H. muyua sp. nov. (Fig. 57) is less curved (almost straight) than in H. slapcinskyi sp. nov. (Fig. 66).

  • Description of adult male (holotype): Colouration (Figs 49, 50A-B): Dorsal surface of chelicera manus dark orange with brown infuscation, more pronounced anteriorly; fingers dark brown to black. Carapace reddish brown, median ocular region black. Tergites brown. Pedipalps reddish brown; carinae and fingers black. Legs paler than tergites, dorsal surface orange to yellow distally; ventral surface dark orange to yellow (tibiae, telotarsi and basitarsi paler than other segments); prolateral carina of femora black. Coxapophyses I-II dark brown, their anterior tips pale yellow; leg coxae orange; sternum orange, posteriorly slightly paler than anteriorly; genital operculum and pectines pale yellow. Sternites III-V brown, their posterior halves pale yellow; sternites VI-VII dark brown. Metasoma reddish brown with darker infuscation; telson paler than metasoma, vesicle dark orange, aculeus reddish brown.

  • Cuticle: Nongranular surfaces of carapace, pedipalps, legs, mesosoma and metasoma finely punctate.

  • Carapace (Fig. 51A, C): Anterior margin with median notch moderately excavated. Anterior furcated sutures distinct. Median ocular tubercle slightly raised; median ocelli present, at least twice the size of lateral ocelli, separated from each other by approximately the diameter of a median ocellus. Three pairs of lateral ocelli, equal in size, equidistant and adjacent to each other. Surfaces minutely and sparsely granular, except for smooth anterior areas of frontal lobes, median ocular area and posteromedian margin.

  • Chelicerae: Basal and median teeth of fixed finger fused into bicusp. Dorsal margin of movable finger with four teeth (one basal, one median, one subdistal and one distal); dorsal distal tooth smaller than ventral distal tooth; ventral margin smooth.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 49, 50A-B, 52B-E, G-J, L-O): Segments distinctly elongated, femur longer than carapace. Chela almost asetose.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 53A, C-D): Fixed finger: basal lobe well developed and conical; suprabasal notch distinct and deep; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to median lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; few sparse denticles on suprabasal notch; single row of denticles on basal lobe. Movable finger: basal lobe absent; suprabasal lobe well developed, conical, gently rounded dorsally and lacking sharp conical tooth, not overlapping with fixed finger; suprabasal lobe and corresponding notch on fixed finger contiguous, no proximal gap or at most a reduced gap evident only when fingers closed; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to suprabasal lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent on basal notch; single row of sparse denticles basally.

  • Pedipalp carinae: Femur (Fig. 52L-O): proventral carina expressed as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; promedian carinae absent; prodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, similarly developed as proventral carina; retrodorsal carina expressed as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, similarly developed as prodorsal carina, more distinct in proximal third of segment; retroventral carina visible as a ridge of medium to large spiniform granules, more developed than retrodorsal carina; ventromedian carina obsolete, only discernible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules. Patella (Fig. 52G-J): proventral carina discernible as a costate-granular ridge proximally, obsolete distally; promedian and prodorsal carinae visible as ridges with medium to large spiniform granules, equally developed, fused medially into prominent spiniform process with medially located pointed apex; dorsomedian carina only visible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retrodorsal carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; paired retromedian carinae fused and visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium-sized granules). Chela manus (Fig. 52B-E): proventral and promedian carinae visible as faint ridges with medium-sized spiniform granules, equally developed; prodorsal carina obsolete, visible as a very faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; dorsomedian carina visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, more strongly developed than prodorsal carina; dorsal secondary carina obsolete; digital carina visible as a ridge of small spiniform granules, less distinct in distal area, more developed than retromedian carina; fused retromedian carinae obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules proximally; retrolateral secondary carina vestigial, only distinct proximal to condyle of movable finger, visible as a ridge of small spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium to large granules); ventromedian carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules.

  • Pedipalp macrosculpture: Femur (Fig. 52L-O): prolateral intercarinal surface densely covered with small spiniform granules; dorsal intercarinal surface densely covered with small spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral dorsal intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules; retrolateral ventral intercarinal surface smooth or nearly so, with few small spiniform granules scattered distally; ventral intercarinal surface densely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth distally. Patella (Fig. 52G-J): prolateral intercarinal surface densely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth distally; dorsal intercarinal surface covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral intercarinal surface with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela manus (Fig. 52B-E): prolateral intercarinal surface covered with dense reticulate network of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth proximally; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela fingers densely covered with small spiniform granules in proximal half, smooth or nearly so distally, ventral surface smooth; trichobothria dst, dsb and db together in a single large smooth depression.

  • Trichobothria: Pedipalp orthobothriotaxic, accessory trichobothria absent. Patella (Fig. 52G-J): d2 trichobothrium distal to patellar process; five eb trichobothria arranged in two groups (eb1+eb4-5 and eb2-3); two esb, two em and one est trichobotria arranged in three groups (esb1-2, em1-2 and est); three et trichobothria; three v trichobothria. Chela manus (Fig. 52B-E): Dt situated in proximal third of manus; Eb3 close to Eb1-2; Esb closer to Est than to Eb group; Est situated near midpoint; four V trichobothria, V3 distant from V4. Fixed chela finger with db situated on dorsal surface; esb closer to eb than to est; eb situated at base of finger, proximal to point of articulation between fixed and movable fingers; two i trichobothria.

  • Coxosternum (Fig. 54A, C): Coxa III elongated anterodistally, without anterodistal process. Sternum equilateral pentagonal (anterior width slightly greater than posterior width), wider than long.

  • Legs (Fig. 55): Femora I-IV with ventral surfaces bicarinate, pro- and retroventral carinae granular. Retrolateral margins of tibiae I-II without setiform macrosetae. Basitarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral rows each with 4/4, 4/4, 4/5 and 4/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively. Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral row each with 3/4, 4/4, 4/4 and 4-5/4-5 setiform macrosetae, respectively; retroventral row with one proximal spinule; ventromedian spinules absent. Ungues curved, shorter than telotarsus, half its length or less.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 54A): Composed of two subtriangular sclerites.

  • Pectines (Fig. 54A-B): Moderately elongated, distal edge reaching but not extending beyond distal edge of coxa IV; fulcrae and three marginal lamellae present. Pectinal teeth count 8-9; teeth straight, entirely covered with sensory papillae.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 50A-B, 51A, E): Pre-tergites I-VII and posterior margins of pre-tergites smooth. Post-tergites: posterior margins of tergites I-VI sublinear, without distinct projection; lateral transversal sulcus present; intercarinal surfaces of I-VII densely covered with small spiniform granules, less so anteromedially on segments I-IV; intercarinal surfaces of III-VII with distinct but faint reticulate network of ridges and dimples. Respiratory stigmata (spiracles) of sternites IV-VI short, their length less than third of sternite width, and distinctly crescent-shaped. Sternite VII acarinate.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 56B-C): Not markedly compressed laterally; intercarinal surfaces sparsely and minutely granular, posterior segments less so; dorsal intercarinal surface of V smooth and shiny medially; distinct dorsomedian sulcus on segments I-IV, much less pronounced on segment V (usually only faintly expressed anteriorly).

  • Metasoma carinae: Segments I-IV: dorsolateral carinae obsolete on all segments; lateral median carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); lateral inframedian carinae discernible anteriorly as a faint ridge on segment I, absent on other segments; ventrolateral carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); paired ventrosubmedian carinae weakly developed (as low ridges). Segment V: dorsolateral and lateral median carinae obsolete; ventrolateral carinae only expressed as faint ridges; ventrosubmedian carinae fused, only expressed as a faint ridge in anterior two thirds.

  • Metasoma spination: Segment I: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules. Segment II: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior and 0-1 pair of median spiniform granules. Segments III-IV: dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carina without large spiniform granules. Segment V: ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae without distinct granules or spines; anal arch crenulate.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: segment I with eight macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and one pair (anterior) on ventrolateral carinae; segments II-IV each with ten macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae; segment V with 16 macrosetae, i.e. four pairs (anterior, median, subposterior and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and four pairs (anterior, supramedian, subposterior and posterior) on ventrolateral carinae.

  • Telson (Fig. 56B): Slightly longer than metasoma segment V; vesicle smooth, without granules; aculeus short (less than half of vesicle length), sharply curved.

  • Hemispermatophore (Fig. 57): Stalk and stem approximately equal in size. Distal lamina very slightly curved, almost straight, without distal crest on anterior margin; a single laminar hook, submedian, situated between 1/3 and 3/7 from base of stalk (basal part/distal lamina ratio = 0.49-0.58, median = 0.52); transverse ridge distinct, more proximal than base of laminar hook, merging with anterior margin more distally than base of laminar hook. Capsule: hemisolenos thin, folded on itself only proximally, above that unfolded to flattened distal tip (tip and base approximately of the same width), without lateral longitudinal carina, laterodistal accessory hook or medioposterior accessory apophysis; tip of hemisolenos more proximal than base of laminar hook, more distal than tip of clasper. Clasper well developed, forming a distinct hump, not hook-like, without anterior accessory process. Subex well developed, spoon-shaped, merging anteriorly with base of clasper; posterior edge forming obtuse angle (>90°) with hemisolenos; anterior edge forming right angle (90°) with hemisolenos.

  • Description of adult female: Same characters as for male except as follows. Colouration (Fig. 50C-D): Legs, telson, coxapophyses, sternum and sternites slightly darker than in male.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 50C-D, 52A, F, K): Segments distinctly shorter or more robust than in male.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 53B): Dentate margins linear or nearly so, without pronounced lobe and notch, with two rows of primary denticles extending from tip to base of fingers and bearing large inner accessory denticles.

  • Carapace (Fig. 51B, D): Anteromedian surface and frontal lobes smooth, only faintly granular along median longitudinal sulci and anterior furcated sulci.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 54D): Oval to semi-oval, distinctly wider than long (length/width ratio = 0.73-0.84, median = 0.78); opercular sclerites partly fused, with distinct median suture; posterior notch present, at least weakly developed.

  • Pectines (Fig. 54D-E): Short, distal edge not reaching distal edge of coxa IV. Pectinal teeth count 6-8; teeth short and straight, sensory papillae only covering distal half.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 50C-D, 51B, F): Post-tergites: reticulate network of ridges and dimples on segments III-VI more distinct than on other segments; intercarinal surfaces of I-III medially smooth, laterally granular; intercarinal surfaces of IV-VI almost totally smooth, faintly granular along lateral margins; intercarinal surfaces of VII densely granular, its proximal third smooth.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 56A): Ventral metasoma setation: segment I with ten macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae.

  • Intraspecific variation: Pedipalp trichobothria: In some specimens trichobotria esb, em and est on the retrolateral side of the patella are arranged in four groups instead of three, i.e. esb1, esb2, em1-2 and est (esb1 apart from esb2). On the retrolateral side of the pedipalp chela Esb may be more distal, aligning with Est.

  • Leg spination: The number of setiform macrosetae varies from three to four in the proventral rows of telotarsi I-II and in the retroventral row of telotarsi I, and from four to five in the proventral rows of telotarsi III-IV and in the retroventral row of telotarsi IV.

  • Female genital operculum: The length/width ratio varies from 0.73 to 0.84 (median = 0.78).

  • Pectines: The pectinal teeth count varies from eight to nine in males and from six to eight in females.

  • Metasoma: Spination: An additional subposterior spiniform granule may be expressed on one of the ventrosubmedian carinae of segment I. The ventrosubmedian carinae of segment II possess 0-1 pair of median spiniform granules, and one granule less may be expressed in the subposterior pair.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: In males an additional supramedian macroseta may be expressed on one of the ventrolateral carinae of segment I, making it a total of nine macrosetae instead of the usual eight.

  • Hemispermatophores: The basal part/distal lamina ratio varies from 0.49 to 0.58 (median = 0.52).

  • Distribution: Hormurus muyua sp. nov. is probably endemic to Woodlark Island, off the eastern tip of New Guinea, Milne Bay Province (Fig. 58).

  • Conservation status: Since 2007 the forests of Woodlark Island have been threatened by several agroforestry, logging and mining projects (Hance, 2008, 2014; Kraus, 2017b, 2021; Cerullo, 2019, 2020). These projects from various extractive industries, if carried out, would have disastrous consequences on the endemic fauna of Woodlark Island, probably driving many representatives of the endemic biota of the island, including scorpions, to extinction (Kraus, 2021).

  • In 2007 Carter Holdings Limited, formerly Vitroplant Limited, acquired a lease to develop a large-scale biofuel project on the island. The company was planning to clear 70 % of the island forests to establish a monoculture oil palm plantation. Following a large public campaign against the project, the lease was temporarily put on hold by the Papua New Guinea government. However, in 2019 the customary landownership of the islanders was revoked by the Waigani National Court in favor of Carter Holdings Limited (Robby, 2020), and 60,400 hectares of forests were then returned as agricultural lease to the company.

  • Moreover, in 2014, Kulawood Limited, a Malaysian logging company, submitted a forest clearance application concerning 30,000 hectares of forests (around 40 % of the island surface) to the Papua New Guinean Forest Authority. Today, the status of the application remains unknown. In 2019, the Australian mining company Geopacific Resources Limited that is running exploratory operations on the island started to expand its infrastructure in preparation for an open-pit gold mine with deep-sea mine tailings disposal, an undertaking which involves the relocation of a complete village. The company faces strong opposition from the local community and discussions between the two parties and the Mineral Resources Authority (MRA) of Papua New Guinea are currently ongoing to solve the dispute.

  • Table 5.

    Hormurus muyua sp. nov., measurements (in mm), repository and inventory number of adult males and females.

    img-z71-2_01.gif

    Fig. 49.

    Hormurus muyua sp. nov., habitus of male, dorsal aspect, reconstruction based on photographs. Scale line: 5 mm.

    img-z72-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 50.

    Hormurus muyua sp. nov., habitus, dorsal (A, C) and ventral (B, D) aspects. (A-B) Male holotype (AMNH [LP4741]). (C-D) Female paratype (AMNH [LP4741]). Scale lines: 10 mm.

    img-z73-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 51.

    Hormurus muyua sp. nov., carapace and mesosomal tergites showing ornamentation and macrosculpture of cuticle (A-B), detailed views of carapace (C-D) and of tergite V (E-F), dorsal aspect. (A, C, E) Male holotype (AMNH [LP4741]). (B, D, F) Female paratype (AMNH [LP4741]). Scale lines: 3 mm (A-B), 2 mm (C-F).

    img-z74-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 52.

    Hormurus muyua sp. nov., pedipalp chela (A-E), patella (F-J), femur and trochanter (K-O), dorsal (A-B, F-G, K-L), retrolateral (C, H, M), ventral (D, I, N) and prolateral (E, J, O) aspects showing trichobothria pattern. (A, F, K) Female paratype (AMNH [LP4741]). (B-E, G-J, L-O) Male holotype (AMNH [LP4741]). Scale lines: 3 mm.

    img-z75-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 53.

    Hormurus muyua sp. nov., left pedipalp chelae, retrolateral aspect showing dentate margin of chela fingers (A-B), dorsal aspect showing dentate margin of movable finger (C), ventral aspect showing dentate margin of fixed finger (D). (A, C-D) Male holotype (AMNH [LP4741]). (B) Female paratype (AMNH [LP4741]). Scale lines: 2 mm.

    img-z76-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 54.

    Hormurus muyua sp. nov., coxae II-IV, sternum, genital operculum and pectines, ventral aspect (A, D), left pecten under UV light (B, E), anterior margin of coxae III (C, F). (A-C) Male holotype (AMNH [LP4741]). (D-F) Female paratype (AMNH [LP4741]). Scale lines: 2 mm.

    img-z78-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 55.

    Hormurus muyua sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP4741]), right tarsi, ventral (A-D) and retrolateral (E) aspects. (A) Tarsus I. (B) Tarsus II. (C) Tarsus III. (D-E) Tarsus IV. Scale line: 2 mm.

    img-z79-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 56.

    Hormurus muyua sp. nov., metasoma and telson, lateral (A-B) and ventral (C) aspects. (A) Female paratype (AMNH [LP4741]). (B-C) Male holotype (AMNH [LP4741]). Dotted circles in C indicate additional macrosetae expressed in some specimens. Scale lines: 3 mm.

    img-z80-6_01.jpg

    Fig. 57.

    Hormurus muyua sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP4741]), left hemispermatophore. (A) Lateral aspect. (B) Anterior aspect. (C) Rotated approximately 45° counter-clockwise from anterior aspect. (D) Contralateral aspect. Scale line: 1 mm.

    img-z81-6_01.jpg

    Fig. 58.

    Known locality of Hormurus muyua sp. nov. and Hormurus slapcinskyi sp. nov. on Woodlark Island, off the eastern tip of New Guinea, Milne Bay Province. Color gradient indicates topography and bathymetry.

    img-z82-11_01.jpg

    Hormurus slapcinskyi Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.
    Figs 5B, 59-66, Tab. 6

  • Material: AMNH [LP 4741]; ♂ holotype; Papua New Guinea, Milne Bay Province, Woodlark Island, 1 km N of Guasopa, 30 m, disturbed rainforest on limestone, 9.21°S, 152.94°E; 24.I.2003; leg. J.D. Slapcinsky (JS-0591). – AMNH [LP 4741]; 1 ♀ paratype; same data as for holotype.

  • Etymology: The species is named after John Slapcinsky, a prominent limnologist from the Florida Museum of Natural History, who conducted several invertebrate surveys in Papua New Guinea, and who collected a large part of the material studied in this paper, including the type specimens of this species. The epithet is an invariable name in apposition.

  • Diagnosis: Hormurus slapcinskyi sp. nov. differs from H. muyua sp. nov. in the following characters: (1) the carapace surface and tergite surfaces in H. slapcinskyi sp. nov. (Fig. 60) are slightly more granular than in H. muyua sp. nov. (Fig. 51); (2) the pedipalp segments in H. slapcinskyi sp. nov. (Fig. 61) are not as high and more elongated than in H. muyua sp. nov. (Fig. 52); (3) the retrodorsal carina of the pedipalp femur is markedly less developed than the prodorsal and retroventral carinae in H. slapcinskyi sp. nov. (Fig. 61K-M), whereas it is slighlty less developed than the prodorsal and retroventral carinae in H. muyua sp. nov. (Fig. 52K-M); (4) metasoma segment I bears ten macrosetae in the male of H. slapcinskyi sp. nov. (Fig. 65C) instead of eight in the males of H. muyua sp. nov. (Fig. 56C); (5) the distal lamina of the hemispermatophore in H. slapcinskyi sp. nov. (Fig. 66) is distinclty more curved than in H. slapcinskyi sp. nov. (Fig. 57).

  • Description of adult male: Colouration (Fig. 59A-B): Dorsal surface of chelicera manus dark orange with brown infuscation, more pronounced anteriorly; fingers dark brown to black. Carapace reddish brown, median ocular region black. Tergites brown. Pedipalps reddish brown; carinae and fingers black. Legs paler than tergites, dorsal surface pale brown to yellow distally; ventral surface dark orange to yellow (tibiae, telotarsi and basitarsi paler); prolateral carina of femora black. Coxapophyses I-II dark brown, their anterior tips pale yellow; leg coxae and sternum brown; genital operculum and pectines yellow. Sternites III-V brown to dark brown, their posterior margins paler than the remaining surfaces; sternites VI-VII dark brown. Metasoma reddish brown with darker infuscation; telson paler than metasoma, vesicle orange, aculeus reddish brown.

  • Cuticle: Nongranular surfaces of carapace, pedipalps, legs, mesosoma and metasoma finely punctate.

  • Carapace (Fig. 60A, C): Anterior margin with median notch moderately excavated. Anterior furcated sutures distinct. Median ocular tubercle slightly raised; median ocelli present, at least twice the size of lateral ocelli, separated from each other by approximately the diameter of a median ocellus. Three pairs of lateral ocelli, equal in size, equidistant and adjacent to each other. Surfaces minutely and densely granular, except for smooth anterior areas of frontal lobes and median ocular area.

  • Chelicerae: Basal and median teeth of fixed finger fused into bicusp. Dorsal margin of movable finger with four teeth (one basal, one median, one subdistal and one distal); dorsal distal tooth smaller than ventral distal tooth; ventral margin smooth.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 59A-B, 61B-E, G-J, L-O): Segments distinctly elongated, femur longer than carapace. Chela almost asetose.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 62A, C-D): Fixed finger: basal lobe well developed and conical; suprabasal notch distinct and deep; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to median lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; few scattered denticles on suprabasal notch; a single row of denticles on basal lobe. Movable finger: basal lobe absent; suprabasal lobe well developed, conical, gently rounded dorsally and lacking sharp conical tooth, not overlapping with fixed finger; suprabasal lobe and corresponding notch on fixed finger contiguous, no proximal gap or at most a reduced gap evident only when fingers closed; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to suprabasal lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; single row of sparse denticles basally.

  • Pedipalp carinae: Femur (Fig. 61L-O): proventral carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; promedian carinae absent; prodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, similarly developed as proventral carina; retrodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, less strongly developed than prodorsal carina, more distinct in proximal third of segment; retroventral carina visible as a ridge of medium to large spiniform granules, distinctly more developed than retrodorsal carina; ventromedian carina obsolete, only discernible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules. Patella (Fig. 61G-J): proventral carina discernible as costate-granular ridge proximally, obsolete distally; promedian and prodorsal carinae visible as ridges with medium-sized spiniform granules, equally developed, fused medially into prominent spiniform process with pointed medially located apex; dorsomedian carina only visible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retrodorsal carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; paired retromedian carinae fused and visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium-sized granules). Chela manus (Fig. 61B-E): proventral and promedian carinae visible as faint ridges with medium-sized spiniform granules, equally developed; prodorsal carina obsolete, visible as a very faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; dorsomedian carina visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, more strongly developed than prodorsal carina; dorsal secondary carina obsolete; digital carina visible as a ridge of small spiniform granules, less distinct in distal area, more developed than retromedian carina; fused retromedian carinae obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules proximally; retrolateral secondary carina vestigial, only discernible proximal to condyle of movable finger as a ridge of small spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium to large granules); ventromedian carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules.

  • Pedipalp macrosculpture: Femur (Fig. 61L-O): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with minute spiniform granules; dorsal intercarinal surface densely covered with small spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small spiniform granules, proximally smooth; ventral intercarinal surface densely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth distally. Patella (Fig. 61G-J): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth distally; dorsal intercarinal surface covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral intercarinal surface with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela manus (Fig. 61B-E): prolateral intercarinal surface covered with dense reticulate network of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth proximally; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela fingers densely covered with small spiniform granules in proximal half, smooth or nearly so distally, ventral surface smooth; trichobothria dst, dsb and db together in a single large smooth depression.

  • Trichobothria: Pedipalp orthobothriotaxic, accessory trichobothria absent. Patella (Fig. 61G-J): d2 trichobothria distal to patellar process; five eb trichobothria arranged in two groups (eb1+eb4-5 and eb2-3); two esb, two em and one est trichobotria arranged in three groups (esb1-2, em1-2 and est); three et trichobothria; three v trichobothria. Chela manus (Fig. 61B-E): Dt situated in proximal third of manus; Eb3 close to Eb1-2; Esb closer to Est than to Eb group; Est situated near midpoint; four V trichobothria, V3 distant from V4. Fixed chela finger with db situated on dorsal surface; esb only slightly closer to eb than to est; eb situated at base of finger, proximal to point of articulation between fixed and movable fingers; two i trichobothria.

  • Coxosternum (Fig. 63A, C): Coxa III elongated anterodistally, without anterodistal process. Sternum equilateral pentagonal (anterior width slightly greater than posterior width), wider than long.

  • Legs (Fig. 64): Femora I-IV with ventral surfaces bicarinate, pro- and retroventral carinae granular. Retrolateral margins of tibiae I-II without setiform macrosetae. Basitarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral rows each with 4/4, 4/5, 4/5 and 4/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively. Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral row each with 3/4, 4/4, 4/4 and 5/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively; retroventral row with one proximal spinule; ventromedian spinules absent. Ungues curved, shorter than telotarsus, half its length or less.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 63A, C): Composed of two subtriangular sclerites.

  • Pectines (Fig. 63A-B): Moderately elongated, distal edge reaching but not extending beyond distal edge of coxa IV; fulcrae and three marginal lamellae present. Pectinal teeth count 8-9; teeth straight, entirely covered with sensory papillae.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 59A-B, 60A, E): Pre-tergites I-VII and posterior margins of pre-tergites smooth. Post-tergites: posterior margins of tergites I-VI sublinear, without distinct projection; lateral transversal sulcus present; intercarinal surfaces of I-VII densely covered with small spiniform granules; intercarinal surfaces of III-VII with distinct but faint reticulate network of ridges and dimples. Respiratory stigmata (spiracles) of sternites IV-VI short, their length less than third of sternite width, and distinctly crescent shaped. Sternite VII acarinate.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 65B-C): Not markedly compressed laterally; intercarinal surfaces sparsely and minutely granular, posterior segments less so; dorsal intercarinal surface of V smooth and shiny medially; distinct dorsomedian sulcus on segments I-IV, much less pronounced on segment V (usually only faintly expressed anteriorly).

  • Metasoma carinae: Segments I-IV: dorsolateral carinae obsolete on all segments; lateral median carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); lateral inframedian carinae visible anteriorly as a faint ridge on segment I, absent on other segments; ventrolateral carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); paired ventrosubmedian carinae weakly developed (as low ridges). Segment V: dorsolateral and lateral median carinae obsolete; ventrolateral carinae only expressed as faint ridges; ventrosubmedian carinae fused, only expressed as a faint ridge in anterior two-thirds.

  • Metasoma spination: Segment I: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules. Segment II: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules and one pair of median spiniform granules. Segments III-IV: dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carinae without large spiniform granules. Segment V: ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae without distinct granules or spines; anal arch crenulate.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: Segments I-IV each with ten macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae; segment V with 16 macrosetae, i.e. four pairs (anterior, median, subposterior and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and four pairs (anterior, supramedian, subposterior and posterior) on ventrolateral carinae.

  • Telson (Fig. 65B): Slightly longer than metasoma segment V; vesicle smooth, without granules; aculeus short (less than half of vesicle length), sharply curved.

  • Hemispermatophore (Fig. 66): Stalk and stem approximately equal in size. Distal lamina curved, almost straight, without distal crest on anterior margin; a single laminar hook, submedian, situated between 1/3 and 3/7 from base of stalk (basal part/distal lamina ratio = 0.52-0.56, median = 0.54); transverse ridge distinct, more proximal than base of laminar hook, merging with anterior margin more distally than base of laminar hook. Capsule: hemisolenos thin, folded on itself only proximally, above that unfolded to flattened distal tip (tip and base approximately of same width), without lateral longitudinal carina, laterodistal accessory hook or medioposterior accessory apophysis; tip of hemisolenos more proximal than base of laminar hook, more distal than tip of clasper. Clasper well developed as a distinct hump, not hook-like, without anterior accessory process. Subex well developed, spoon-shaped, merging anteriorly with base of clasper; posterior edge forming obtuse angle (>90°) with hemisolenos; anterior edge forming right angle (90°) with hemisolenos.

  • Description of adult female: Same characters as for male except as follows. Colouration (Fig. 59C-D): Legs and telson slightly darker than in male.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 59C-D, 61A, F, K): Segments noticeably shorter or more robust than in male.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 62B): Dentate margins linear or nearly so, without pronounced lobe and notch, with two rows of primary denticles extending from tip to base of fingers and bearing large inner accessory denticles.

  • Carapace (Fig. 60B, D): Posteromedian margin smooth. Genital operculum (Fig. 63D, F): Oval to semi-oval, distinctly wider than long (length/width ratio = 0.78); opercular sclerites partly fused, with distinct median suture; posterior notch present, at least weakly developed. Pectines (Fig. 63D-E): Short, distal edge not reaching distal edge of coxa IV. Pectinal teeth count 7; teeth short and straight, sensory papillae covering only distal half.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 59C-D, 60B, F): Post-tergites: reticulate network of ridges and dimples on segments III-VII more distinct than in male; intercarinal surfaces of I-III medially smooth, laterally granular; intercarinal surfaces of IV-VI almost completely smooth, faintly granular along lateral margins; intercarinal surfaces of VII densely granular, proximal third smooth.

  • Intraspecific variation: Pedipalp trichobothria: In some specimens trichobotria esb, em and est on the retrolateral side of the patella are arranged in four groups instead of three, i.e. esb1, esb2, em1-2 and est (esb1 apart from esb2). On the retrolateral side of the pedipalp chela Esb may be more distal, aligning with Est.

  • Leg spination: The number of setiform macrosetae varies from three to four in the proventral row on telotarsi II and from four to five in the proventral row on telotarsi IV.

  • Pectines: The pectinal teeth count varies from eight to nine in males.

  • Metasoma: Spination: One less granule may be expressed in the median group of granules of the ventrosubmedian carinae on segment I.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: Segment I may bear nine macrosetae instead of ten because one of the supramedian macrosetae of the ventrolateral carinae is not expressed in some specimens.

  • Hemispermatophores: The basal part/distal lamina ratio varies from 0.52 to 0.56 (median = 0.54).

  • Distribution: Hormurus slapcinskyi sp. nov. is probably endemic to Woodlark Island, off the eastern tip of New Guinea, Milne Bay Province (Fig. 58).

  • Table 6.

    Hormurus slapcinskyi sp. nov., measurements (in mm), repository and inventory number of adult male holotype and adult female paratype.

    img-z84-2_01.gif

    Fig. 59.

    Hormurus slapcinskyi sp. nov., habitus, dorsal (A, C) and ventral (B, D) aspects. (A-B) Male holotype (AMNH [LP4741]). (C-D) Female paratype (AMNH [LP4741]). Scale lines: 10 mm.

    img-z85-3_01.jpg

    Fig. 60.

    Hormurus slapcinskyi sp. nov., carapace and mesosomal tergites showing ornamentation and macrosculpture of cuticle (A-B), detailed views of carapace (C-D) and of tergite V (E-F), dorsal aspect. (A, C, E) Male holotype (AMNH [LP4741]). (B, D, F) Female paratype (AMNH [LP4741]). Scale lines: 3 mm (A-B), 2 mm (C-F).

    img-z86-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 61.

    Hormurus slapcinskyi sp. nov., pedipalp chela (A-E), patella (F-J), femur and trochanter (K-O), dorsal (A-B, F-G, K-L), retrolateral (C, H, M), ventral (D, I, N) and prolateral (E, J, O) aspects showing trichobothria pattern. (A, F, K) Female paratype (AMNH [LP4741]). (B-E, G-J, L-O) Male holotype (AMNH [LP4741]). Scale lines: 3 mm.

    img-z87-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 62.

    Hormurus slapcinskyi sp. nov., left pedipalp chelae, retrolateral aspect showing dentate margin of chela fingers (A-B), dorsal aspect showing dentate margin of movable finger (C), ventral aspect showing dentate margin of fixed finger (D). (A, C-D) Male holotype (AMNH [LP4741]). (B) Female paratype (AMNH [LP4741]). Scale lines: 2 mm.

    img-z88-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 63.

    Hormurus slapcinskyi sp. nov., coxae II-IV, sternum, genital operculum and pectines, ventral aspect (A, D), left pecten under UV light (B, E), anterior margin of coxae III (C, F). (A-C) Male holotype (AMNH [LP4741]). (D-F) Female paratype (AMNH [LP4741]). Scale lines: 2 mm (A, C-D, F), 1 mm (B, E).

    img-z90-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 64.

    Hormurus slapcinskyi sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP4741]), right tarsi, ventral (A-D) and retrolateral (E) aspects. (A) Tarsus I. (B) Tarsus II. (C) Tarsus III. (D-E) Tarsus IV. Scale line: 2 mm.

    img-z91-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 65.

    Hormurus slapcinskyi sp. nov., metasoma and telson, lateral (A-B) and ventral (C) aspects. (A) Female paratype (AMNH [LP4741]). (B-C) Male holotype (AMNH [LP4741]). The dotted circle in C indicates the additional macroseta expressed in the female paratype. Scale lines: 3 mm.

    img-z92-5_01.jpg

    Fig. 66.

    Hormurus slapcinskyi sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP4741]), left hemispermatophore. (A) Lateral aspect. (B) Anterior aspects. (C) Rotated approximately 45° counter-clockwise from anterior aspect. (D) Contralateral aspect. Scale line: 1 mm.

    img-z93-14_01.jpg

    Hormurus ancylolobus Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.
    Figs 1-3, 67-73, Tab. 7

  • This species was treated under the manuscript name “Hormurus ankistros” in Monod (2011a: 281, 532, 536, figs 17A-B, 18, 26-28).

  • Material: AMNH [LP 4339]; ♀ holotype; Papua New Guinea, Sandaun Province, Sindik, 0.3 km NW of Parkop village, 3 km NW of Sibilanga Mission, 426 m, broadleaf tropical hill forest, 3.42°S, 142.52°E; 12.V.2005; leg. J.D. Slapcinsky, S. Nimbisan & K. Netchy (JS 793). – AMNH [LP 4339]; 1 subadult ♀paratype; same data as for holotype.

  • Etymology: The species name ancylolobus is the Latinized version of the ancient Greek words “ἀγκύλoς” [crooked, curved, beaked, hooked] and “λoβóς” [elongated projection, protuberance]. The epithet is an invariable noun in apposition and refers to the unusual hook-like anterodistal process of coxae III observed in the female holotype. Except for the present species, these anterodistal processes are absent in Hormurus females, only present in males of H. krausi sp. nov. and H. papuanus.

  • Diagnosis: Hormurus ancylolobus sp. nov. can be easily distinguished from other Papuan congeners by the presence of pointed processes at the anterodistal tips of coxae II-III in mature females (Fig. 70B, D-E). Those are hook-like and more strongly developed on coxae III than on coxae II. This unique character is not present in any other known Hormurus species. Moreover, the median notch of the anterior carapace margin in H. ancylolobus sp. nov. (Fig. 68A) is deeper than in other Papuan Hormurus.

  • Description of adult female: Colouration (Fig. 67): Dorsal surface of chelicera manus light brown with darker infuscation, more pronounced anteriorly; fingers black. Carapace black with lighter spots (reddish brown) in posterior half. Tergites brown. Pedipalps black, ventral intercarinal surfaces reddish brown. Legs dark brown with a network of lighter spots, as dark as tergites. Coxapophyses I-II black, their anterior tips brown; leg coxae and sternum brown with a network of orange spots; genital operculum and pectines yellow. Sternites III-VI brown to dark brown; sternite V with posterior margin pale yellow; sternite VII dark brown to black. Metasoma black, intercarinal surfaces slightly lighter (reddish brown). Telson reddish brown to black, aculeus black.

  • Cuticle: Nongranular surfaces of carapace, pedipalps, legs, mesosoma and metasoma finely punctate.

  • Carapace (Fig. 68A-B): Anterior margin with median notch moderately excavated. Anterior furcated sutures distinct. Median ocular tubercle slightly raised; median ocelli present, at least twice the size of lateral ocelli, separated from each other by approximately the diameter of a median ocellus. Three pairs of lateral ocelli, equal in size, equidistant and adjacent to each other. Surfaces minutely and densely granular except for smooth anterior areas of frontal lobes and of median ocular area.

  • Chelicerae: Basal and median teeth of fixed finger fused into bicusp. Dorsal margin of movable finger with four teeth (one basal, one median, one subdistal and one distal); dorsal distal tooth smaller than ventral distal tooth; ventral margin smooth.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 67, 69): Segments rather short, femur approximately equal in length to carapace. Chela almost asetose.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 70A): Dentate margins of movable and fixed fingers linear or nearly so, without pronounced lobe and notch, with two rows of primary denticles extending from tip to base of fingers and bearing large inner accessory denticles.

  • Pedipalp carinae: Femur (Fig. 69I-L): proventral carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; promedian ventral carina obsolete, reduced to a single large granule in basal third of segment; prodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium to large spiniform granules, more developed than proventral carina; retrodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium to large spiniform granules, similarly developed as prodorsal carina; retroventral carina visible as a ridge of medium to large spiniform granules, similarly developed as retrodorsal carina; ventromedian carina obsolete, only discernible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules. Patella (Fig. 69E-H): proventral carina discernible as a costate-granular ridge proximally, obsolete distally; promedian and prodorsal carinae visible as ridges with medium to large spiniform granules, these equally developed and fused medially into a prominent spiniform process with a pointed, medially located apex; dorsomedian carina only visible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retrodorsal carina visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; paired retromedian carinae fused and visible as a ridge of medium to large spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium to large granules). Chela manus (Fig. 69A-D): proventral and promedian carinae visible as faint ridges with medium-sized spiniform granules, these equally developed; prodorsal carina obsolete, visible as a very faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; dorsomedian carina visible as a faint ridge of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, more strongly developed than prodorsal carina; dorsal secondary carina obsolete; digital carina visible as a ridge of small spiniform granules, less distinct in distal area, more developed than retromedian carina; fused retromedian carinae obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules proximally; retrolateral secondary carina vestigial, only distinct proximal to condyle of movable finger, expressed as a ridge of small spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium-sized granules); ventromedian carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, becoming decreasingly pronounced distally.

  • Pedipalp macrosculpture: Femur (Fig. 69I-L): prolateral intercarinal surface densely covered with small spiniform granules; dorsal intercarinal surface densely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral intercarinal surface almost entirely smooth, very sparsely covered with small spiniform granules; proximal half of ventral intercarinal surface densely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, distal half smooth. Patella (Fig. 69E-H): prolateral intercarinal surface densely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; dorsal intercarinal surface covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; retrolateral intercarinal surface with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela manus (Fig. 69A-D): prolateral intercarinal surface densely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth proximally; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela fingers densely covered with small spiniform granules in proximal half, smooth or nearly so distally, ventral surface smooth; trichobothria dst, dsb and db together in a single large smooth depression.

  • Trichobothria: Pedipalp orthobothriotaxic, accessory trichobothria absent. Patella (Fig. 69E-H): d2 trichobothrium distal to patellar process; five eb trichobothria arranged in two groups (eb1+eb4-5 and eb2-3); two esb, two em and one est trichobotria arranged in three groups, i.e. esb1, esb2+em1-2 and est (esb2 closer to em1-2 than to esb1); three et trichobothria; three v trichobothria. Chela manus (Fig. 69A-D): Dt situated in proximal third of manus; Eb3 close to Eb1-2; Esb aligned with Est; Est situated near midpoint; four V trichobothria, V3 distant from V4. Fixed chela finger with db situated on dorsal surface; esb closer to eb than to est; eb situated at base of finger, proximal to point of articulation between fixed and movable fingers; two i trichobothria.

  • Coxosternum (Fig. 70B, D-E): Coxa II with a distinct but small pointed anterodistal process. Coxa III with a distinct hook-like anterodistal process. Sternum equilateral pentagonal (anterior width slightly greater than posterior width), wider than long.

  • Legs (Fig. 71): Femora I-IV with ventral surfaces bicarinate, pro- and retroventral carinae granular. Retrolateral margins of tibiae I-II without setiform macrosetae. Basitarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral rows each with 4/4, 4/5, 4/5 and 4/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively. Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral row each with 3/3-4, 4/4, 5/5 and 5/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively; retroventral row with one proximal spinule; ventromedian spinules absent. Ungues curved, shorter than telotarsus, more than half its length.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 70B): Oval to semi-oval, distinctly wider than long (length/width ratio = 0.83); opercular sclerites partly fused, with distinct median suture; posterior notch present, at least weakly developed.

  • Pectines (Fig. 70B-C): Short, distal edge not reaching distal edge of coxa IV; fulcrae and three marginal lamellae present. Pectinal teeth count 9-10; teeth short and straight, sensory papillae covering only distal half.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 67, 68A, C-D): Pre-tergites I-VII and posterior margins of pre-tergites smooth. Post-tergites: posterior margins of tergites I-VI sublinear, without distinct projection; lateral transversal sulcus present; intercarinal surfaces of I-II medially smooth, laterally granular; intercarinal surfaces of III-VI almost totally smooth, faintly granular along lateral margins; intercarinal surfaces of VII densely granular, proximal third smooth; intercarinal surfaces of III-VII with distinct reticulate network of ridges and dimples. Respiratory stigmata (spiracles) of sternites IV-VI long, their length at least one third of sternite width, and distinctly crescent shaped. Sternite VII acarinate.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 72): Not markedly compressed laterally; sparsely and minutely granular, posterior segments less so (segment IV-V almost smooth); dorsal intercarinal surface of V smooth and shiny medially; a distinct dorsomedian sulcus on segments I-IV, much less pronounced on segment V (usually only faintly expressed anteriorly).

  • Metasoma carinae: Segments I-IV: dorsolateral carinae obsolete on all segments; lateral median carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); lateral inframedian carinae on segment I anteriorly expressed as a faint ridge, absent on other segments; ventrolateral carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); paired ventrosubmedian carinae weakly developed (as low ridges). Segment V: dorsolateral and lateral median carinae obsolete; ventrolateral carinae only expressed as faint ridges; ventrosubmedian carinae fused, only expressed as a faint ridge in anterior two-thirds.

  • Metasoma spination: Segment I: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules and with 0-1 pair of median granules. Segment II: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules and 1-2 pairs of median spiniform granules. Segments III-IV: dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carina without large spiniform granules. Segment V: ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventromedian carina without spiniform granules; anal arch crenulate.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: Segments I-IV each with ten macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae; segment V with 16 macrosetae, i.e. four pairs (anterior, median, subposterior and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae, and four pairs (anterior, supramedian, subposterior and posterior) on ventrolateral carinae.

  • Telson (Fig. 72A): Slightly longer than metasoma segment V; vesicle smooth, without granules; aculeus short (less than half of vesicle length), sharply curved.

  • Intraspecific variation: Leg spination: The number of setiform macrosetae in the retroventral row of telotarsi I varies from three to four.

  • Pectines: The pectinal teeth count varies from nine to ten in females.

  • Metasoma: Spination: One extra granule may be expressed in the median and subposterior groups of the ventrosubmedian carinae of segments I-II. One spiniform granule may be expressed in the posterior half of one of the ventrolateral carinae of segment V.

  • Distribution: Hormurus ancylolobus sp. nov. is only known from one locality in northern Papua New Guinea, Sandaun Province (Fig. 73).

  • Table 7.

    Hormurus ancylolobus sp. nov., measurements (in mm), repository and inventory number of the adult female holotype.

    img-z95-2_01.gif

    Fig. 67.

    Hormurus ancylolobus sp. nov., habitus of female holotype (AMNH [LP4339]). (A) Dorsal aspect. (B) Ventral aspect. Scale line: 15 mm.

    img-z96-6_01.jpg

    Fig. 68.

    Hormurus ancylolobus sp. nov., female holotype (AMNH [LP4339]), dorsal aspect. (A) Carapace and mesosomal tergites showing ornamentation and macrosculpture of cuticle. (B) Detailed view of carapace. (C) Detailed view of tergite V. (D) Detailed view of tergite VII. Scale lines: 5 mm (A), 3 mm (B-C), 4 mm (D).

    img-z97-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 69.

    Hormurus ancylolobus sp. nov., female holotype (AMNH [LP4339]), pedipalp chela (A-D), patella (E-H), femur and trochanter (I-L). Dorsal (A, E, I), retrolateral (B, F, J), ventral (C, G, K) and prolateral (D, H, L) aspects showing trichobothria pattern. Scale line: 5 mm.

    img-z98-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 70.

    Hormurus ancylolobus sp. nov., pedipalp chela, retrolateral aspect showing dentate margin of chela fingers (A), coxae II-IV, sternum, genital operculum and pectines, ventral aspect (B), left pecten under UV light (C), antero-distal margin of coxae III (D-E). (A-D) Female holotype (AMNH [LP4339]). (E) Subadult female paratype (AMNH [LP4339]). Pointed processes at the anterodistal tips of coxae II-III are indicated by white circles. Scale lines: 3 mm (A, D-E), 5 mm (B), 2 mm (C).

    img-z99-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 71.

    Hormurus ancylolobus sp. nov., female holotype (AMNH [LP4339]), right tarsi, ventral (A-D) and retrolateral (E) aspects. (A) Tarsus I. (B) Tarsus II. (C) Tarsus III. (D-E) Tarsus IV. Scale line: 2 mm.

    img-z100-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 72.

    Hormurus ancylolobus sp. nov., female holotype (AMNH [LP4339]), metasoma and telson. (A) Lateral aspect. (B) Ventral aspect. Scale lines: 5 mm.

    img-z101-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 73.

    Type locality and only known locality of Hormurus ancylolobus sp. nov. in northern Papua New Guinea, Sandaun Province. Color gradient indicates topography and bathymetry.

    img-z102-7_01.jpg

    Hormurus cameroni Monod, Austin & Prendini, sp. nov.
    Figs 74-82, Tab. 8

  • Material: AMNH [LP 2731]; ♂ holotype; Papua New Guinea, Milne Bay Province, Pini Range, abandoned logging road W of Duabo Mission Station, 325 m, small remnant of rainforest in secondary forest, in large rotting log, 10.41°S, 150.30°E; 30.IV.2002; leg. F. Kraus. – AMNH [LP 2731]; 1 juvenile ♂ paratype; same data as for holotype. – UMMZ [LP 2731]; 1 juvenile ♂ paratype; same data as for holotype. – AMNH [LP 2716]; 1 ♂, 1 ♀ paratypes; Milne Bay Province, Cloudy Mountains, Ubwam Mountain, headwater to Watuti River, 715 m, rainforest, under logs, 10.50°S, 150.23°E; 11.IV.2002; leg. J.D. Slapcinsky (JS-0506). – UMMZ [LP 2716]; 1 imm. paratype; Milne Bay Province, Cloudy Mountains, Ubwam Mountain, headwater to Watuti River, 715 m, rainforest, under logs, 10.50°S, 150.23°E; 11.IV.2002; leg. J.D. Slapcinsky (JS-0506). – MHNG-ARTO-26551; 1 ♂, 1 ♀, 1 juvenile ♂, 1 juvenile ♀ paratypes; Duabo Lookout, 359 m, 10.42°S, 150.31°E; VIII.2006; leg. C. Austin. – MHNG-ARTO-26550; 2 ♂, 3 ♀, 2 subadult ♂ paratypes; Milne Bay Province, East Cape, N/S Rd, 261 m, 10.31°S, 150.62°E; 8.VIII.2006; leg. C. Austin. – MHNG-ARTO-26552; 4 ♀, 1 subadult ♀ paratypes; Milne Bay Province, Halowia Village, 22 m, 10°20.14S, 150°34.38E; VIII.2006; leg. C. Austin.

  • Etymology: The species is named after the late Howard Don Cameron. Upon his retirement from the University of Michigan in 2010, Cameron was the Chairman of the Department of Classical Studies, as well as Curator of Zoology. He was interested in arachnids, and especially scorpions. Because of their friendship, Fred Kraus made a concerted effort to collect scorpions, in addition to amphibians and reptiles, during his expeditions. A large part of the material upon which the present study is based is thus an indirect result of Cameron's influence.

  • Diagnosis: Hormurus cameroni sp. nov. is morphologically close to Hormurus maiwa sp. nov., both species possess hemispermatophores with subdistal lamellar hooks (situated between 1/3 and 3/7 from the base of the stalk; basal part/distal lamina ratio > 0.5 and < 0.75) and female genital opercula that are as wide as long (length/width ratio > 0.85 and < 1).

  • Hormurus cameroni sp. nov. differs from H. maiwa sp. nov. in the following characters: (1) the frontal lobes of the carapace are smooth in H. cameroni sp. nov. (Fig. 75), whereas they are at least sparsely granular in H. maiwa sp. nov. (Fig. 94); (2) the medially located apex of the prolateral patellar process of the pedipalp in H. cameroni sp. nov. (Fig. 76F-G, I) is less developed and less curved than in H. maiwa sp. nov. (Fig. 95F-G, I); (3) the pedipalps of H. cameroni sp. nov. (Fig. 76) are more finely granular and with weaker carinae than those of H. maiwa sp. nov. (Fig. 95); (4) on the retrolateral side of the pedipalp patella trichobothrium esb2 is closer to esb1 than to em1-2, resulting in three (esb1-2, em1-2 and est) or four (esb1, esb2, em1-2 and est) groups in H. cameroni sp. nov. (Fig. 76H), whereas esb2 is close to em1-2, resulting in three groups (esb1, esb2+em1-2 and est) in H. maiwa sp. nov. (Fig. 95H); (5) the pectines are slightly more elongated in H. cameroni sp. nov. (Fig. 78A-B, D-E) than in H. maiwa sp. nov. (Fig. 97A-B, D-E); (6) the hemispermatophore stalk is only slightly longer than the stem in H. cameroni sp. nov. (Fig. 81), whereas the length difference is much more pronounced in H. maiwa sp. nov. (Fig. 100); (7) the transverse ridge of the hemispermatophore merges with the anterior margin of the stalk more distally than the base of the laminar hook in H. cameroni sp. nov. (Fig. 81A, D-E, G), whereas it merges more proximally than the base of the laminar hook in H. maiwa sp. nov. (Fig. 100A, D-E, H).

  • Description of adult male (holotype): Colouration (Fig. 74A-B): Dorsal surface of chelicera manus dark orange with brown infuscation, more pronounced anteriorly; fingers black. Carapace reddish brown, median ocular region black. Tergites reddish brown, its carinae darker. Pedipalps reddish brown; carinae and fingers black. Legs paler than tergites, dorsal surface pale brown to orange distally, with darker infuscation except on telotarsi; ventral surface dark orange to yellow (tibiae, telotarsi and basitarsi paler); prolateral carina of femora black. Coxapophysis II black; coxapophysis I and leg coxae light brown to orange, anterior margin black; sternum black, with two large light brown spots posteriorly; sternites III-V light brown, with a network of orange spots and dark brown lateral margins, V with posterior margin pale yellow; sternite VI dark brown, with network of orange spots; sternite VII dark brown; genital operculum and pectines pale yellow. Metasoma reddish brown with darker infuscation; telson paler than metasoma, vesicle orange, aculeus reddish brown.

  • Cuticle: Nongranular surfaces of carapace, pedipalps, legs, mesosoma and metasoma finely punctate.

  • Carapace (Fig. 75A, C): Anterior margin with median notch moderately excavated. Anterior furcated sutures distinct. Median ocular tubercle slightly raised; median ocelli present, at least twice the size of lateral ocelli, separated from each other by approximately the diameter of a median ocellus. Three pairs of lateral ocelli, equal in size, equidistant and adjacent to each other. Surfaces minutely and densely granular, except for smooth frontal lobes (median longitudinal sulci and anterior furcated sulci granular) and median ocular area.

  • Chelicerae: Basal and median teeth of fixed finger fused into bicusp. Dorsal margin of movable finger with four teeth (one basal, one median, one subdistal and one distal); dorsal distal tooth smaller than ventral distal tooth; ventral margin smooth.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 74A-B, 76B-E, G-J, L-O): Segments long and slender, femur distincly longer than carapace. Chela almost asetose.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 77A, C-D): Fixed finger: basal lobe well developed and conical; suprabasal notch distinct and deep; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to median lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; few sparse denticles on suprabasal notch; single row of denticles on basal lobe. Movable finger: basal lobe absent; suprabasal lobe well developed, conical, gently rounded dorsally and lacking sharp conical tooth, not overlapping with fixed finger; suprabasal lobe and corresponding notch on fixed finger contiguous, no proximal gap or at most a reduced gap only evident when fingers closed; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to suprabasal lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; few sparse denticles basally.

  • Pedipalp carinae: Femur (Fig. 76L-O): proventral carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; promedian carinae absent; prodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized to large spiniform granules, similarly developed as proventral carina; retrodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, similarly developed as prodorsal carina, more distinct in proximal third of segment; retroventral carina visible as a ridge of medium to large spiniform granules, distinctly more developed than retrodorsal carina; ventromedian carina obsolete, only discernible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules. Patella (Fig. 76G-J): proventral carina expressed as costate-granular ridge proximally, obsolete distally; promedian and prodorsal carinae visible as ridges with medium-sized spiniform granules, equally developed, fused medially into prominent spiniform process with medially located pointed apex; dorsomedian carina only visible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retrodorsal carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; paired retromedian carinae fused and visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium to large granules). Chela manus (Fig. 76B-E): proventral and promedian carinae visible as faint ridges with medium-sized spiniform granules, equally developed; prodorsal carina obsolete, visible as very faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; dorsomedian carina visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, more strongly developed than prodorsal carina; dorsal secondary carina obsolete; digital carina visible as a ridge of small spiniform granules, less distinct in distal area, more developed than retromedian carina; fused retromedian carinae obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules proximally; retrolateral secondary carina vestigial, only discernible proximal to condyle of movable finger as a ridge of small spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium to large granules); ventromedian carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules.

  • Pedipalp macrosculpture: Femur (Fig. 76L-O): prolateral intercarinal surface densely covered with small spiniform granules; dorsal intercarinal surface densely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral dorsal intercarinal surface sparsely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules; retrolateral ventral intercarinal surface densely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, proximally smooth; ventral intercarinal surface densely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Patella (Fig. 76G-J): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela manus (Fig. 76B-E): prolateral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth proximally; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela fingers densely covered with small spiniform granules in proximal half, smooth or nearly so distally, ventral surface smooth; trichobothria dst, dsb and db together in a single large smooth depression.

  • Trichobothria: Pedipalp orthobothriotaxic, accessory trichobothria absent. Patella (Fig. 76G-J): d2 trichobothrium distal to patellar process; five eb trichobothria arranged in two groups (eb1+eb4-5 and eb2-3); two esb, two em and one est trichobotria arranged in three groups (esb1-2, em1-2 and est); three et trichobothria; three v trichobothria. Chela manus (Fig. 76B-E): Dt situated in proximal third of manus; Eb3 close to Eb1-2; Esb aligned with Est, sometimes situated slightly more distal to it; Est situated near midpoint; four V trichobothria, V3 distant from V4. Fixed chela finger with db situated on dorsal surface; esb only slightly closer to eb than to est; eb situated at base of finger, proximal to point of articulation between fixed and movable fingers; two i trichobothria. Coxosternum (Fig. 78A, C): Coxa III elongated anterodistally, without anterodistal process. Sternum equilateral pentagonal (anterior width slightly greater than posterior width), slightly wider than long.

  • Legs (Fig. 79): Femora I-IV with ventral surfaces bicarinate, pro- and retroventral carinae granular. Retrolateral margins of tibiae I-II without setiform macrosetae. Basitarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral rows each with 3/4, 4/5, 4/5 and 4/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively. Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral rows each with 3-4/4, 4/4, 4-5/4 and 4-5/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively; retroventral row with one proximal spinule; ventromedian spinules absent. Ungues shorter than telotarsus, half its length or less.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 78A): Composed of two subtriangular sclerites.

  • Pectines (Fig. 78A-B): Moderately elongated, distal edge reaching but not extending beyond distal edge of coxa IV; fulcrae and three marginal lamellae present. Pectinal teeth count 8-9; teeth straight, entirely covered with sensory papillae.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 74A-B, 75A, E): Pre-tergites I-VII and posterior margins of pre-tergites smooth. Post-tergites: posterior margins of tergites I-VI sublinear, without distinct projection; lateral transversal sulcus present; intercarinal surfaces of I-VII densely covered with small spiniform granules, slightly less granular medially on I-III; intercarinal surfaces of III-VII with distinct but faint reticulate network of ridges and dimples. Respiratory stigmata (spiracles) of sternites IV-VI short, their length less than third of sternite width, and distinctly crescent shaped. Sternite VII acarinate.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 80B-C): Not markedly compressed laterally; intercarinal surfaces sparsely and minutely granular, posterior segments less so; dorsal intercarinal surface of V smooth and shiny medially; distinct dorsomedian sulcus on segments I-IV, much less pronounced on segment V (usually only faintly expressed anteriorly).

  • Metasoma carinae: Segments I-IV: dorsolateral carinae obsolete on all segments; lateral median carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); lateral inframedian carinae discernible anteriorly as a faint ridge on segment I, absent on other segments; ventrolateral carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); paired ventrosubmedian carinae weakly developed (as low ridges). Segment V: dorsolateral and lateral median carinae obsolete; ventrolateral carinae only expressed as faint ridges; ventrosubmedian carinae fused, only expressed as a faint ridge in anterior two-thirds.

  • Metasoma spination: Segment I: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules and 0-1 pair of median granules. Segment II: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules and one pair of median spiniform granules. Segments III-IV: dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carina without large spiniform granules. Segment V: ventrolateral carinae without distinct granules or spines, ventromedian carina usually also without distinct spines, rarely with minute spiniform granules; anal arch crenulate.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: Segment I with ten macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae; segments II-IV each with ten macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae; segment V with 16 macrosetae, i.e. four pairs (anterior, median, subposterior and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and four pairs (anterior, supramedian, subposterior and posterior) on ventrolateral carinae.

  • Telson (Fig. 80B): Slightly longer than metasoma segment V; vesicle smooth, without granules; aculeus short (less than half of vesicle length), strongly curved.

  • Hemispermatophore (Fig. 81): Stalk slightly longer than stem. Distal lamina curved, without distal crest on anterior margin; single laminar hook, submedian, situated between 1/3 and 3/7 from base of stalk (basal part/distal lamina ratio = 0.55-0.66, median = 0.57); transverse ridge distinct, more proximal than base of laminar hook, merging with anterior margin more distally than base of laminar hook. Capsule: hemisolenos thin, folded on itself only proximally, above that unfolded to flattened distal tip (tip and base approximately of same width), without lateral longitudinal carina, laterodistal accessory hook or medioposterior accessory apophysis; tip of hemisolenos more proximal than base of laminar hook, more distal than tip of clasper. Clasper well developed, forming distinct hump, not hook-like, without anterior accessory process. Subex well developed, spoon-shaped, merging anteriorly with base of clasper; posterior edge forming obtuse angle (>90°) with hemisolenos; anterior edge forming right angle (90°) with hemisolenos.

  • Description of adult female: Same characters as for male except as follows. Pedipalps (Figs 74C-D, 76A, F, K): Segments noticeably shorter or more robust than in male.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 77B): Dentate margins linear or nearly so, without pronounced lobe and notch, with two rows of primary denticles extending from tip to base of fingers and bearing large inner accessory denticles.

  • Carapace (Fig. 75B, D): Posteromedian margin smooth.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 78D): Oval to semi-oval, as wide as long or only slightly wider than long (length/width ratio = 0.72-1.00, median = 0.94); opercular sclerites partly fused, with distinct median suture; posterior notch present, at least weakly developed.

  • Pectines (Fig. 78D-E): Short, distal edge not reaching distal edge of coxa IV. Pectinal teeth count 6-7; teeth short and straight, sensory papillae covering only distal half.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 74C-D, 75B, F): Post-tergites: reticulate network of ridges and dimples on segments III-VII more distinct than in male; intercarinal surfaces of I-II medially smooth, laterally granular; intercarinal surfaces of III-VI almost totally smooth, faintly granular along lateral margins; intercarinal surfaces of VII densely granular, proximal third smooth.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 80A): Spination: ventrosubmedian carinae of segment II with 1-2 pairs of subposterior spiniform granules and 0-2 pairs of median spiniform granules.

  • Intraspecific variation: Pedipalp trichobothria: On the retrolateral side of pedipalp patella trichobothrium esb1 is in some specimens located midway between esb2 and em1-2, resulting in four groups (esb1, esb2, em1-2 and est) instead of three.

  • Leg spination: The number of setiform macrosetae varies from three to four in the proventral row of telotarsi I and from four to five in the proventral rows of telotarsi III-IV. Genital operculum: The length/width ratio varies from 0.72 to 1.00 (median = 0.94).

  • Pectines: The pectinal teeth count varies from eight to nine in males and from six to seven in females.

  • Metasoma: Spination: 0-1 pair of median spiniform granules is present on the ventrosubmedian carinae of segment I; 1-2 pairs of subposterior spiniform granules and 0-2 pairs of median spiniform granules are present on the ventrosubmedian carinae of segment II. Furthermore, one more or one fewer granule may be expressed in each group of granules on each segment.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: One or two fewer macroseta may be expressed on each segment (usually in the supramedian group and less frequently in the anterior or posterior groups) resulting in a total of eight or nine macrosetae instead of ten on segments I-IV, and a total of 15 instead of 16 on segment V.

  • Hemispermatophores: The basal part/distal lamina ratio varies from 0.55 to 0.66 (median = 0.57).

  • Distribution and ecology: Hormurus cameroni sp. nov. is only known from the eastern tip of mainland New Guinea, Milne Bay Province (Fig. 82). Specimens were found in or under logs on the forest floor.

  • Table 8.

    Hormurus cameroni sp. nov., measurements (in mm), repositories and inventory numbers of adult males and females.

    img-z104-2_01.gif

    (continued).

    img-z105-2_01.gif

    Fig. 74.

    Hormurus cameroni sp. nov., habitus, dorsal (A, C) and ventral (B, D) aspect. (A-B) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2731]). (C-D) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2716]). Scale lines: 10 mm.

    img-z106-5_01.jpg

    Fig. 75.

    Hormurus cameroni sp. nov., carapace and mesosomal tergites showing ornamentation and macrosculpture of cuticle (A-B), detailed views of carapace (C-D) and of tergite V (E-F), dorsal aspect. (A, C, E) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2731]). (B, D, F) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2716]). Scale lines: 3 mm (A-B), 2 mm (C-F).

    img-z107-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 76.

    Hormurus cameroni sp. nov., pedipalp chela (A-E), patella (F-J), femur and trochanter (K-O), dorsal (A-B, F-G, K-L), retrolateral (C, H, M), ventral (D, I, N) and prolateral (E, J, O) aspects showing trichobothria pattern. (A, F, K) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2716]). (B-E, G-J, L-O) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2731]). Scale lines: 3 mm.

    img-z109-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 77.

    Hormurus cameroni sp. nov., left pedipalp chelae, retrolateral aspect showing dentate margin of chela fingers (A-B), dorsal aspect showing dentate margin of movable finger (C), ventral aspect showing dentate margin of fixed finger (D). (A, C-D) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2731]). (B) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2716]). Scale lines: 2 mm.

    img-z110-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 78.

    Hormurus cameroni sp. nov., coxae II-IV, sternum, genital operculum and pectines, ventral aspect (A, D), left pecten under UV light (B, E), anterior margin of coxae III (C, F). (A-C) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2731]). (D-F) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2716]). Scale lines: 2 mm (A, C-D, F), 1 mm (B, E).

    img-z111-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 79.

    Hormurus cameroni sp. nov., male paratype (LSUM, East Cape), right tarsi, ventral (A-D) and retrolateral (E) aspects. (A) Tarsus I. (B) Tarsus II. (C) Tarsus III. (D-E) Tarsus IV. Scale line: 2 mm.

    img-z112-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 80.

    Hormurus cameroni sp. nov., metasoma and telson, lateral (A-B) and ventral (C) aspects. (A) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2716]). (B-C) Male paratype (LSUM, Lookout Duabo). Dotted circles in C indicate macrosetae not expressed in some specimens. Scale lines: 3 mm.

    img-z113-8_01.jpg

    Fig. 81.

    Hormurus cameroni sp. nov., left hemispermatophore of male holotype (AMNH [LP273]) (A-D), of male paratype (LSUM, Lookout Duabo) (E-F) and of male paratype (LSUM, East Cape) (G-H). (A, E, G) Lateral aspect. (B, F, H) Anterior aspect. (C) Rotated approximately 45° counter-clockwise from anterior aspect. (D) Contralateral aspect. Scale lines: 1 mm.

    img-z114-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 82.

    Known localities of Hormurus cameroni sp. nov. at the eastern tip of mainland New Guinea, Milne Bay Province. Color gradient indicates topography and bathymetry.

    img-z115-5_01.jpg

    Hormurus yela Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.
    Figs 4F, 83-92, Tab. 9

  • This species was treated under the manuscript name “Hormurus yelae” in Monod (2011a: 294, 533, 536).

  • Material: AMNH [LP 3007]; ♂ holotype; Papua New Guinea, Milne Bay Province, Rossel Island, Pipikea, camp 2, 253 m, 11.33°S, 154.22°E; 11.V.2004; leg. J.D. Slapcinsky (JS-0718). – AMNH [LP 3007]; 7 ♀paratypes; same data as for holotype. – UMMZ [LP 3007]; 5 imm. paratypes; same data as for holotype. – AMNH [LP 3006]; 1 ♀ paratype; Rossel Island, Lubwe creek at base of Tachu Gap, 638 m, 11.35°S, 154.22°E; 6.V.2004; leg. J.D. Slapcinsky (JS-0716).

  • Etymology: Yela is the Papuan name for Rossel Island, to which the species is most probably endemic. The epithet is an invariable name in apposition.

  • Diagnosis: Hormurus yela sp. nov. can be easily distinguished from other Papuan Hormurus by the ventral setation of the metasoma. This species has the highest number of macrosetae (Fig. 90C): 12 on segment I, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on the ventrosubmedian carinae and three pairs (anterior, median and supramedian) on the lateral carinae, 16 on segments II-IV, i.e. four pairs (anterior, submedian, median and posterior) on the ventrosubmedian carinae and four pairs (anterior, submedian, median and supramedian) on the ventrolateral carinae, and 20 on segment V, i.e. five pairs (anterior, median, supramedian, subposterior and posterior) on the ventrosubmedian carinae and five pairs (anterior, median, supramedian, subposterior and posterior) on the lateral carinae. Moreover, among Papuan Hormurus the presence of a tetrahedral anterior accessory process on the hemispermatophore claspers (Fig. 91) is unique to this species.

  • Description of adult male (holotype): Colouration (Figs 83, 84A-B): Dorsal surface of chelicera manus dark orange with brown infuscation, more pronounced anteriorly; fingers black. Carapace reddish brown, median ocular region black. Tergites brown. Pedipalps reddish brown; carinae and fingers black. Legs paler than tergites, dorsal and ventral surfaces dark orange to yellow distally (tibiae, telotarsi and basitarsi paler than other sclerites); prolateral carina of femora black. Coxapophysis II brown to black; coxapophysis I and leg coxae light brown to orange; sternum light brown; sternites III-VI light brown to brown, with darkened lateral margins, V with medioposterior half pale yellow; sternite VII dark brown; genital operculum and pectines pale yellow. Metasoma reddish brown; telson paler than metasoma, vesicle orange, aculeus reddish brown.

  • Cuticle: Nongranular surfaces of carapace, pedipalps, legs, mesosoma and metasoma finely punctate.

  • Carapace (Fig. 85A, C): Anterior margin with median notch moderately excavated. Anterior furcated sutures distinct. Median ocular tubercle slightly raised; median ocelli present, at least twice the size of lateral ocelli, separated from each other by approximately the diameter of a median ocellus. Three pairs of lateral ocelli, equal in size, equidistant and adjacent to each other. Surfaces minutely and sparsely granular, except for smooth frontal lobes (median longitudinal sulci and anterior furcated sulci granular) and median ocular area.

  • Chelicerae: Basal and median teeth of fixed finger fused into bicusp. Dorsal margin of movable finger with four teeth (one basal, one median, one subdistal and one distal); dorsal distal tooth smaller than ventral distal tooth; ventral margin smooth.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 83, 84A-B, 86B-E, G-J, L-O): Segments long and slender, femur longer than carapace. Chela almost asetose.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 87A, C-D): Fixed finger: basal lobe well developed and conical; suprabasal notch distinct and deep; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to median lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent on suprabasal notch; single row of denticles on basal lobe. Movable finger: basal lobe absent; suprabasal lobe well developed, conical, gently rounded dorsally and lacking sharp conical tooth, not overlapping with fixed finger; suprabasal lobe and corresponding notch on fixed finger contiguous, no proximal gap or at most a reduced gap only evident when fingers closed; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to suprabasal lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; few sparse denticles basally.

  • Pedipalp carinae: Femur (Fig. 86L-O): Proventral carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; promedian carinae absent; prodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized to large spiniform granules, similarly developed as proventral carina; retrodorsal carina visible as a ridge of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, less developed than prodorsal carina, more distinct in proximal third of segment; retroventral carina visible as a ridge of medium to large spiniform granules, distinctly more developed than retrodorsal carina; ventromedian carina obsolete, only discernible proximally as a ridge of small spiniform granules. Patella (Fig. 86G-J): proventral carina expressed as costate-granular ridge proximally, obsolete distally; promedian and prodorsal carinae visible as ridges with medium-sized spiniform granules, equally developed, fused medially into low spiniform process with pointed medially located apex; dorsomedian carina only visible proximally as a ridge of small spiniform granules; retrodorsal carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of small to medium-sized spiniform granules; paired retromedian carinae fused and visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina costate-granular (composed of medium-sized spiniform granules). Chela manus (Fig. 86B-E): proventral and promedian carinae equally developed, visible as faint ridges with medium-sized spiniform granules; prodorsal carina obsolete, visible as very faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; dorsomedian carina visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, more strongly developed than prodorsal carina; dorsal secondary carina obsolete; digital carina visible as a ridge of small spiniform granules, less distinct in distal area, more developed than retromedian carina; fused retromedian carinae obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules proximally; retrolateral secondary carina vestigial, only discernible proximal to condyle of movable finger, developed as a ridge of small spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium-sized to large granules); ventromedian carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules.

  • Pedipalp macrosculpture: Femur (Fig. 86L-O): prolateral intercarinal surface densely covered with small spiniform granules; dorsal intercarinal surface densely covered with small spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral dorsal intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small spiniform granules; retrolateral ventral intercarinal surface densely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, proximally smooth; ventral intercarinal surface densely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Patella (Fig. 86G-J): prolateral intercarinal surface densely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; dorsal intercarinal surface covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; retrolateral intercarinal surface with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela manus (Fig. 86B-E): prolateral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth proximally; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela fingers densely covered with small spiniform granules in proximal half, smooth or nearly so distally, ventral surface smooth; trichobothria dst, dsb and db together in a single large smooth depression.

  • Trichobothria: Pedipalp orthobothriotaxic, accessory trichobothria absent. Patella (Fig. 86G-J): d2 trichobothrium distal to patellar process; five eb trichobothria arranged in two groups (eb1+eb4-5 and eb2-3); two esb, two em and one est trichobotria arranged in three groups (esb1-2, em1-2 and est); three et trichobothria; three v trichobothria. Chela manus (Fig. 86B-E): Dt situated in proximal third of manus; Eb3 close to Eb1-2; Esb closer to Est than to Eb group; Est situated near midpoint; four V trichobothria, V3 distant from V4. Fixed chela finger with db situated on dorsal surface; esb, eb, est and et equidistant from each other; eb situated at base of finger, proximal to point of articulation between fixed and movable fingers; two i trichobothria.

  • Coxosternum (Fig. 88A, C): Coxa III elongated anterodistally, without anterodistal process. Sternum equilateral pentagonal (anterior width slightly greater than posterior width), wider than long.

  • Legs (Fig. 89): Femora I-IV with ventral surfaces bicarinate, pro- and retroventral carinae granular. Retrolateral margins of tibiae I-II without setiform macrosetae. Basitarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral rows each with 4/4, 4/4, 4/5 and 4/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively. Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral row each with 3-4/4, 4/4, 4-5/5 and 4-5/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively; retroventral row with one proximal spinule; ventromedian spinules absent. Ungues shorter than telotarsus, half its length or less.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 88A): Composed of two subtriangular sclerites.

  • Pectines (Fig. 88A-B): Moderately elongated, distal edge reaching but not extending beyond distal edge of coxa IV; fulcrae and three marginal lamellae present. Pectinal teeth count 7-8; teeth straight, entirely covered with sensory papillae.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 84A-B, 85A, E): Pre-tergites I-VII and posterior margins of pre-tergites smooth. Post-tergites: posterior margins of tergites I-VI sublinear, without distinct projection; lateral transversal sulcus present; intercarinal surfaces of I-VI almost smooth medially, sparsely covered with small spiniform granules laterally, posterior half more densely granular; intercarinal surface of VII sparsely covered with small spiniform granules; intercarinal surfaces of III-VII with distinct but faint reticulate network of ridges and dimples. Respiratory stigmata (spiracles) of sternites IV-VI short, their length less than third of sternite width, and distinctly crescent shaped. Sternite VII acarinate.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 90B-C): Not markedly compressed laterally; sparsely and minutely granular, posterior segments less so (segment V almost smooth); dorsal intercarinal surface of V smooth and shiny medially; distinct dorsomedian sulcus on segments I-IV, much less pronounced on segment V (usually only faintly expressed anteriorly).

  • Metasoma carinae: Segments I-IV: dorsolateral carinae obsolete on all segments; lateral median carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); lateral inframedian carinae expressed anteriorly as a faint ridge on segment I, absent on other segments; ventrolateral carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); paired ventrosubmedian carinae weakly developed (as low ridges). Segment V: dorsolateral and lateral median carinae obsolete; ventrolateral carinae only expressed as faint ridges; ventrosubmedian carinae fused, only expressed as a faint ridge in anterior two-thirds.

  • Metasoma spination: Segment I: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules. Segment II: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules and 0-1 pair of median spiniform granules. Segments III-IV: dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carina without large spiniform granules. Segment V: ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae without distinct granules or spines; anal arch crenulate.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: Segment I with 12 macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and three pairs (anterior, median and supramedian) on lateral carinae; segments II-IV each with 16 macrosetae, i.e. four pairs (anterior, submedian, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and four pairs (anterior, submedian, supramedian and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae]; segment V with 19 macrosetae, i.e. four pairs (anterior, median, subposterior and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae, five pairs (anterior, median, supramedian, subposterior and posterior) on lateral carinae and one supramedian macroseta between ventrosubmedian carinae.

  • Telson (Fig. 90B): Slightly longer than metasoma segment V; vesicle smooth, without granules; aculeus short (less than half of vesicle length), sharply curved. Hemispermatophore (Fig. 91): Stalk longer than stem. Distal lamina curved, without distal crest on anterior margin; single laminar hook, submedian, situated between 1/3 and 3/7 from base of stalk (basal part/distal lamina ratio = 0.57-0.60, median = 0.58); transverse ridge distinct, approximately aligned with base of laminar hook, merging with anterior margin more distally than base of laminar hook. Capsule: hemisolenos thin, folded on itself only proximally, above that unfolded to flattened distal tip (tip and base approximately of same width), without lateral longitudinal carina, laterodistal accessory hook or medioposterior accessory apophysis; tip of hemisolenos more proximal than base of laminar hook and more distal than tip of clasper. Clasper well developed, forming distinct hump, not hook-like, with tetrahedral anterior accessory process. Subex well developed, spoon-shaped, merging anteriorly with base of clasper; posterior edge forming an obtuse angle (>90°) with hemisolenos; anterior edge forming a right angle (90°) with hemisolenos.

  • Description of adult female: Same characters as for male except as follows. Colouration (Fig. 84C-D): Legs and telson slightly darker than in male.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 84C-D, 86A, F, K): Segments noticeably shorter or more robust than in male.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 87B): dentate margins linear or nearly so, without pronounced lobe and notch, with two rows of primary denticles extending from tip to base of fingers and bearing large inner accessory denticles.

  • Carapace (Fig. 85B, D): Posteromedian margin smooth.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 88D): Oval to semi-oval, as wide as long or only slightly wider than long (length/width ratio = 0.89-0.96 median = 0.91); opercular sclerites partly fused, with distinct median suture; posterior notch present, at least weakly developed.

  • Pectines (Fig. 88D-E): Short, distal edge not reaching distal edge of coxa IV. Pectinal teeth count 5-7; teeth short and straight, sensory papillae covering only distal half.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 84C-D, 85B, F): Post-tergites: reticulate network of ridges and dimples on segments III-VII more distinct than in male; intercarinal surfaces of I-II medially smooth, granular along lateral margins; intercarinal surfaces of III-VI almost totally smooth, faintly granular along lateral margins; intercarinal surfaces of VII densely granular in distal two-thirds, in proximal third smooth.

  • Intraspecific variation: Pedipalp trichobothria: On the retrolateral side of the pedipalp patella trichobothrium esb1 is in some specimens located midway between esb2 and em1-2 rather than close to esb2, resulting in four groups (esb1, esb2, em1-2 and est) instead of three. On the retrolateral side of the pedipalp chela Esb can be more distal than usual, aligning with Est.

  • Leg spination: The number of setiform macrosetae varies from three to four in the proventral row of telotarsi I and from four to five in the proventral row of telotarsi III-IV.

  • Genital operculum: The length/width ratio varies from 0.89 to 0.96 (median = 0.91).

  • Pectines: The pectinal teeth count varies from seven to eight in males and from five to seven in females.

  • Metasoma: Spination: 0-1 pair of median spiniform granules is present in the ventrosubmedian carinae of segment II. One or two extra granules may be expressed in the subposterior group of granules of segment I, and one fewer granule may be expressed in the median or subposterior group of granules of segment II.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: 0-3 fewer macrosetae may be expressed on one segment. Thus, segment I may possess 11 or 13 macrosetae instead of 12 (one more or one fewer expressed), segment II may have 14 or 15 instead of 16 (one or two not expressed), segments III-IV may have 15 instead of 16 (one not expressed) and segment V may have 17, 18 or 20 instead of 19 (one or two not expressed or one extra expressed) (Fig. 90C-H).

  • Hemispermatophores: The basal part/distal lamina ratio varies from 0.57 to 0.6 (median = 0.58).

  • Distribution and ecology: Hormurus yela sp. nov. is probably endemic to Rossel Island, the easternmost island of the Louisiade Archipelago off the eastern tip of New Guinea, Milne Bay Province (Fig. 92). Specimens were collected in a small ditch that retained moisture and was littered with numerous small rocks.

  • Table 9.

    Hormurus yela sp. nov., measurements (in mm), repository and inventory number of adult male holotype and adult females paratypes.

    img-z117-2_01.gif

    Fig. 83.

    Hormurus yela sp. nov., habitus of male, dorsal aspect, reconstruction based on photographs. Scale line: 10 mm.

    img-z118-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 84.

    Hormurus yela sp. nov., habitus, dorsal (A, C) and ventral (B, D) aspect. (A-B) Male holotype (AMNH [LP3007]). (C-D) Female paratype (AMNH [LP3007]). Scale lines: 10 mm.

    img-z119-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 85.

    Hormurus yela sp. nov., carapace and mesosomal tergites showing ornamentation and macrosculpture of cuticle (A-B), detailed views of carapace (C-D) and of tergite V (E-F), dorsal aspect. (A, C, E) Male holotype (AMNH [LP3007]). (B, D, F) Female paratype (AMNH [LP3007]). Scale lines: 3 mm (A-B), 2 mm (C-F).

    img-z120-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 86.

    Hormurus yela sp. nov., pedipalp chela (A-E), patella (F-J), femur and trochanter (K-O), dorsal (A-B, F-G, K-L), retrolateral (C, H, M), ventral (D, I, N) and prolateral (E, J, O) aspects showing trichobothria pattern. (A, F, K) Female paratype (AMNH [LP3007]). (B-E, G-J, L-O) Male holotype (AMNH [LP3007]). Scale lines: 5 mm.

    img-z122-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 87.

    Hormurus yela sp. nov., left pedipalp chelae, retrolateral aspect showing dentate margin of chela fingers (A-B), dorsal aspect showing dentate margin of movable finger (C), ventral aspect showing dentate margin of fixed finger (D). (A, C-D) Male holotype (AMNH [LP3007]). (B) Female paratype (AMNH [LP3007]). Scale lines: 2 mm.

    img-z124-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 88.

    Hormurus yela sp. nov., coxae II-IV, sternum, genital operculum and pectines, ventral aspect (A, D), left pecten under UV light (B, E), anterior margin of coxae III (C, F). (A-C) Male holotype (AMNH [LP3007]). (D-F) Female paratype (AMNH [LP3007]). Scale lines: 2 mm (A, C-D, F), 1 mm (B, E).

    img-z125-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 89.

    Hormurus yela sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP3007]), right tarsi, ventral (A-D) and retrolateral (E) aspects. (A) Tarsus I. (B) Tarsus II. (C) Tarsus III. (D-E) Tarsus IV. Scale line: 1 mm.

    img-z126-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 90.

    Hormurus yela sp. nov., metasoma and telson, lateral (A-B) and ventral (C) aspects; metasoma segment V, ventral aspect (DH). (A) Female paratype (AMNH [LP3007]). (B-C) Male holotype (AMNH [LP3007]). (D-E, G-H) Adult female paratypes (AMNH [LP3007]). (F) Subadult female paratype (AMNH [LP3007]). Dotted circles in C indicate additional macrosetae expressed in some specimens. Scale lines: 3 mm (A-C), 2 mm (D-H).

    img-z127-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 91.

    Hormurus yela sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP3007]), left hemispermatophore. (A) Lateral aspect. (B) Anterior aspect. (C) Rotated approximately 45° counter-clockwise from anterior aspect. (D) Contralateral aspect. The tetrahedral accessory process present on the anterodistal side of the claspers is indicated by circles. Scale line: 1 mm.

    img-z128-8_01.jpg

    Fig. 92.

    Known localities of Hormurus yela sp. nov. on Rossel Island, the easternmost island of the Louisiade Archipelago off the eastern tip of New Guinea, Milne Bay Province. Color gradient indicates topography and bathymetry.

    img-z129-1_01.jpg

    Hormurus maiwa Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.
    Figs 93-101, Tab. 10

  • This species was treated under the manuscript name “Hormurus milneanus” in Monod (2011a: 289, 532, 543).

  • Material: AMNH (without registration number); ♂holotype; Papua New Guinea, Milne Bay Province, Kwagira River, Peria Creek, camp 7 [9°39′28.8″S, 149°19′40.8″E]; 14.VIII.-6.IX.1953; leg. G.M. Tate, Archbold Expedition. – AMNH (without registration number); 1 ♂, 4 ♀, 1 juvenile ♂ paratypes; same data as for holotype. – AMNH (without registration number); 1 ♂, 2 ♀, 1 juvenile ♂, 1 juvenile ♀ paratypes; Papua New Guinea, Milne Bay Province, Maneau Range, N slope of Mount Dayman, camp 6 [9°41′31.2″S, 149°18′28.8″E], 700 m; 13.-26.VII.1953; leg. G.M. Tate, Archbold Expedition.

  • Etymology: The Maiwa are a Papuan people whose territory extends from the northern slopes and foothills of the Maneo Range, north of Mount Dayman, to the coast in Moi Biri Bay (Dutton, 1971). The type locality alongside the Kwagira or Kwagila River is located in this area. The epithet is an invariable name in apposition.

  • Diagnosis: Hormurus maiwa sp. nov. is morphologically close to Hormurus cameroni sp. nov. The two species differ in the following characters: (1) the frontal lobes of the carapace are at least sparsely granular in H. maiwa sp. nov. (Fig. 94), whereas they are smooth in H. cameroni sp. nov. (Fig. 75); (2) the medially located apex of the prolateral patellar process is more developed and more curved in H. maiwa sp. nov. (Fig. 95F-G, I) than in H. cameroni sp. nov. (Fig. 76F-G, I); (3) the pedipalps of H. maiwa sp. nov. (Fig. 95) are more coarsely granular and with stronger carinae than those of H. cameroni sp. nov. (Fig. 76); (4) on the retrolateral side of the pedipalp patella trichobothrium esb2 is close to em1-2, resulting in three groups (esb1, esb2+em1-2 and est) in H. maiwa sp. nov. (Fig. 95H), whereas esb2 is closer to esb1 than to em1-2, resulting in three (esb1-2, em1-2 and est) or four (esb1, esb2, em1-2 and est) groups in H. cameroni sp. nov. (Fig. 76H); (5) the pectines are slightly shorter in H. maiwa sp. nov. (Fig. 97) than in H. cameroni sp. nov. (Fig. 78); (6) the hemispermatophore stalk is distincly longer than the stem in H. maiwa sp. nov. (Fig. 100), whereas the length difference is much less pronounced in H. cameroni sp. nov. (Fig. 81); (7) the transverse ridge merges with the anterior margin of the stalk more proximally than the base of laminar hook in H. maiwa sp. nov. (Fig. 100A, D-E, H), whereas it merges more distally than the base of laminar hook in H. cameroni sp. nov. (Fig. 81A, D-E, G).

  • Description of adult male (holotype): Colouration (Fig. 93A-B): Dorsal surface of chelicera manus dark orange with brown infuscation, more pronounced anteriorly; fingers black. Carapace reddish brown, median ocular region black. Tergites brown. Pedipalps reddish brown; carinae and fingers black. Legs slightly paler than tergites, light brown to dark orange, prolateral carina of femora black. Coxapophysis I orange, its anterior tip yellow; coxapophysis II, leg coxae and sternum reddish brown to dark orange; sternites III-VI brown, with darker lateral margins, V with posterior margin pale yellow; sternite VII dark brown; genital operculum and pectines pale orange. Metasoma reddish brown with darker infuscation; telson paler than metasoma, vesicle orange, aculeus reddish brown.

  • Cuticle: Nongranular surfaces of carapace, pedipalps, legs, mesosoma and metasoma finely punctate.

  • Carapace (Fig. 94A, C): Anterior margin with median notch moderately excavated. Anterior furcated sutures distinct. Median ocular tubercle slightly raised; median ocelli present, at least twice the size of lateral ocelli, separated from each other by approximately the diameter of a median ocellus. Three pairs of lateral ocelli, equal in size, equidistant and adjacent to each other. Surfaces minutely and densely granular, except for smooth anterior areas of frontal lobes and median ocular area.

  • Chelicerae: Basal and median teeth of fixed finger fused into bicusp. Dorsal margin of movable finger with four teeth (one basal, one median, one subdistal and one distal); dorsal distal tooth smaller than ventral distal tooth; ventral margin smooth.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 93A-B, 95B-E, G-J, L-O): Segments long and slender, femur distinctly longer than carapace. Chela almost asetose.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 96A, C-D): Fixed finger: basal lobe well developed and conical; suprabasal notch distinct and deep; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to median lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent on suprabasal notch; single row of denticles on basal lobe. Movable finger: basal lobe absent; suprabasal lobe well developed, conical, gently rounded dorsally and lacking sharp conical tooth, not overlapping with fixed finger; suprabasal lobe and corresponding notch on fixed finger contiguous, no proximal gap or at most a reduced gap only evident when fingers closed; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to suprabasal lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent on suprabasal notch; few sparse denticles basally.

  • Pedipalp carinae: Femur (Fig. 95L-O): proventral carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized to large spiniform granules; promedian carinae absent; prodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized to large spiniform granules, similarly developed as proventral carina; retrodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized to large spiniform granules, less developed than prodorsal carina, more distinct in proximal third of segment; retroventral carina visible as a ridge of medium to large spiniform granules, distinctly more developed than retrodorsal carina; ventromedian carina obsolete, only discernible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules. Patella (Fig. 95G-J): proventral carina expressed as costate-granular ridge proximally, obsolete distally; promedian and prodorsal carinae visible as ridges with medium-sized to large spiniform granules, equally developed, fused medially into prominent spiniform process with pointed and curved medially located apex (hook-like); dorsomedian carina only visible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retrodorsal carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; paired retromedian carinae fused and visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized to large spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium-sized to large granules). Chela manus (Fig. 95B-E): proventral and promedian carinae visible as faint ridges with medium-sized spiniform granules, equally developed; prodorsal carina obsolete, visible as very faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; dorsomedian carina visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, more strongly developed than prodorsal carina; dorsal secondary carina obsolete; digital carina visible as a ridge of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, less distinct in distal area, more developed than retromedian carina; fused retromedian carinae obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules proximally; retrolateral secondary carina vestigial, only discernible proximal to condyle of movable finger as a ridge of small spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium to large granules); ventromedian carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules.

  • Pedipalp macrosculpture: Femur (Fig. 95L-O): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small spiniform granules; dorsal intercarinal surface densely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, proximally smooth; ventral intercarinal surface densely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, distal third smooth. Patella (Fig. 95G-J): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, distal third smooth; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela manus (Fig. 95B-E): prolateral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth proximally; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal areas smooth. Chela fingers densely covered with small spiniform granules in proximal half, smooth or nearly so distally, ventral surface smooth; trichobothria dst, dsb and db together in a single large smooth depression.

  • Trichobothria: Pedipalp orthobothriotaxic, accessory trichobothria absent. Patella (Fig. 95G-J): d2 trichobothrium distal to patellar process; five eb trichobothria arranged in two groups (eb1+eb4-5 and eb2-3); two esb, two em and one est trichobotria arranged in three (esb1, esb2+em1-2 and est) or two (esb1 and esb2+em1-2+est) groups; three et trichobothria; three v trichobothria. Chela manus (Fig. 95B-E): Dt situated in proximal third of manus; Eb3 close to Eb1-2; Esb aligned with Est, sometimes slightly more distal; Est situated near midpoint; four V trichobothria, V3 distant from V4. Fixed chela finger with db situated on dorsal surface; esb only slightly closer to eb than to est; eb situated at base of finger, proximal to point of articulation between fixed and movable fingers; two i trichobothria.

  • Coxosternum (Fig. 97A, C): Coxa III elongated anterodistally, without anterodistal process. Sternum equilateral pentagonal (anterior width slightly greater than posterior width), slightly wider than long.

  • Legs (Fig. 98): Femora I-IV with ventral surfaces bicarinate, pro- and retroventral carinae granular. Retrolateral margins of tibiae I-II without setiform macrosetae. Basitarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral rows each with 4/4, 4/5, 4/5 and 4/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively. Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral row each with 3-4/4, 4-5/4, 4-5/5 and 5/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively; retroventral row with one proximal spinule; ventromedian spinules absent. Ungues shorter than telotarsus, half its length or less.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 97A): Composed of two subtriangular sclerites.

  • Pectines (Fig. 97A-B): Short, distal edge not reaching distal edge of coxa IV; fulcrae and three marginal lamellae present. Pectinal teeth count 7-9; teeth straight, entirely covered with sensory papillae.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 93A-B, 94A, E): Pre-tergites I-VII and posterior margins of pre-tergites smooth. Post-tergites: posterior margins of tergites I-VI sublinear, without distinct projection; lateral transversal sulcus present; intercarinal surfaces of I-VI densely covered with small spiniform granules, anteromedian half slightly less granular; intercarinal surface of VII densely covered with small spiniform granules; intercarinal surfaces of III-VII with distinct but faint reticulate network of ridges and dimples. Respiratory stigmata (spiracles) of sternites IV-VI short, their length less than third of sternite width, and distinctly crescent shaped. Sternite VII acarinate.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 99B-C): Not markedly compressed laterally; intercarinal surfaces sparsely and minutely granular, posterior segments less so; dorsal intercarinal surface of V smooth and shiny medially; distinct dorsomedian sulcus on segments I-IV, much less pronounced on segment V (usually only expressed faintly anteriorly) than on others.

  • Metasoma carinae: Segments I-IV: dorsolateral carinae obsolete on all segments; lateral median carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); lateral inframedian carinae discernible anteriorly as a faint ridge on segment I, absent on other segments; ventrolateral carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); paired ventrosubmedian carinae weakly developed (as low ridges). Segment V: dorsolateral and lateral median carinae obsolete; ventrolateral carinae only expressed as faint ridges; ventrosubmedian carinae fused, only expressed as a faint ridge in anterior two-thirds.

  • Metasoma spination: Segment I: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules and 0-1 pair of median granules. Segment II: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules and 0-1 pair of median granules. Segments III-IV: dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carina without large spiniform granules. Segment V: ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae without distinct granules or spines; anal arch crenulate.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: Segment I with eight macosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and one pair (anterior) on lateral carinae, or ten macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae; segments II-IV with ten macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae; segment V with 16 macrosetae, i.e. four pairs (anterior, median, subposterior and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and four pairs (anterior, supramedian, subposterior and posterior) on ventrolateral carinae.

  • Telson (Fig. 99B): Slightly longer than metasoma segment V; vesicle smooth, without granules; aculeus short (less than half of vesicle length), sharply curved.

  • Hemispermatophore (Fig. 100): Stalk distinctly shorter than stem. Distal lamina curved, without distal crest on anterior margin; single laminar hook submedian, situated between 1/3 and 3/7 from base of stalk (basal part/distal lamina ratio = 0.63-0.67, median = 0.66); transverse ridge distinct, more proximal than base of laminar hook, merging with anterior margin more proximally than base of laminar hook. Capsule: hemisolenos thin, folded on itself only proximally and above that unfolded to flattened distal tip (tip and base approximately of same width), without lateral longitudinal carina, laterodistal accessory hook or medioposterior accessory apophysis; tip of hemisolenos more proximal than base of laminar hook, more distal than tip of clasper. Clasper well developed, forming distinct hump, not hook-like, without anterior accessory process. Subex well developed, spoon-shaped, merging anteriorly with base of clasper; posterior edge forming obtuse angle (>90°) with hemisolenos; anterior edge forming right angle (90°) with hemisolenos.

  • Description of adult female: Same characters as male except as follows. Pedipalps (Figs 93C-D, 95A, F, K): Segments noticeably shorter or more robust than in male.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 96B): Dentate margins linear or nearly so, without pronounced lobe and notch, with two rows of primary denticles extending from tip to base of fingers and bearing large inner accessory denticles.

  • Carapace (Fig. 94B, D): Frontal lobes smooth, median longitudinal sulci and anterior furcated sulci granular; posteromedian margin smooth.

  • Legs: Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral row each with 3-4/4, 4/4-5, 4-5/4-5 and 4-5/5, respectively, retroventral row with one or two proximal spinules.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 97D): Oval to semi-oval, as wide as long or only slightly wider than long (length/width ratio = 0.78-0.92, median = 0.89); opercular sclerites partly fused, with distinct median suture; posterior notch present, at least weakly developed.

  • Pectines (Fig. 97D-E): Short, distal edge not reaching distal edge of coxa IV. Pectinal teeth count 6-7; teeth short and straight, sensory papillae covering only distal half.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 93C-D, 94B, F): Post-tergites: reticulate network of ridges and dimples on segments III-VII more distinct than in male; intercarinal surfaces of I-II medially smooth, laterally granular; intercarinal surfaces of III-VI almost totally smooth, faintly granular along lateral margins; intercarinal surfaces of VII densely granular, proximal third smooth.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 99A): Spination: Segment II: ventrosubmedian carinae with 1-2 pairs of subposterior spiniform granules and 0-1 pair of median granules.

  • Intraspecific variation: Pedipalp trichobothria: On the retrolateral side of the pedipalp patella trichobothrium esb1 is in some specimens located midway between esb2 and em1-2 rather than close to em1-2, resulting in four groups (esb1, esb2, em1-2 and est) rather than two or three.

  • Leg spination: The number of setiform macrosetae varies from three to four in the proventral row of telotarsi I, and from four to five in the proventral rows of telotarsi II-IV and in the retroventral rows of telotarsi II-III. One or two proximal spinules are present on the retroventral rows of the telotarsi.

  • Genital operculum: The length/width ratio varies from 0.78 to 0.92 (median = 0.89).

  • Pectines: The pectinal teeth count varies from seven to nine in males and from six to seven in females.

  • Metasoma: Spination: 0-1 pair of median spiniform granules are present on the ventrosubmedian carinae of segment I; 1-2 pairs of subposterior spiniform granules and 0-1 pair of median spiniform granules are present on the ventrosubmedian carinae of segment II. Furthermore, one more or one fewer granule may be expressed in each group of granules on each segment.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: One fewer macroseta may be expressed in the anterior group of segment II resulting in a total of nine macrosetae instead of ten. One to three fewer macrosetae may be expressed on segment V (in the anterior, median and/or subposterior groups) resulting in a total of 13 to 15 macrosetae instead of 16.

  • Hemispermatophores: The basal part/distal lamina ratio varies from 0.63 to 0.67 (median = 0.66).

  • Distribution: Hormurus maiwa sp. nov. is only known from the eastern banks of the Kwagira River in the northern foothills of Mount Dayman (2987 m) in the Maneau Range, Milne Bay Province (Fig. 101).

  • Remarks: The type specimens were collected during the fourth Archbold Expedition to New Guinea (Brass, 1956). The expedition leader, Leonard J. Brass, an Australian botanist, was accompanied by two zoologists, Hobart M. van Deusen and Geoffrey M. Tate, and a field assistant from the AMNH, Kenneth M. Wynn. The purpose of the expedition was to gather zoological and botanical collections from the Cape Vogel Peninsula and from the Goodenough and Fergusson Islands in the D'Entrecasteaux group. Six months into the trip (September 1953) Tate suffered a paralytic stroke, prematurely ending his participation in the fieldwork.

  • Table 10.

    Hormurus maiwa sp. nov., measurements (in mm) and repository of adult males and females.

    img-z130-2_01.gif

    (continued).

    img-z131-2_01.gif

    Fig. 93.

    Hormurus maiwa sp. nov., habitus, dorsal (A, C) and ventral (B, D) aspect. (A-B) Male holotype (AMNH, Peria Creek). (C-D) Female paratype (AMNH, Peria Creek). Scale lines: 10 mm.

    img-z132-4_01.jpg

    Fig. 94.

    Hormurus maiwa sp. nov., carapace and mesosomal tergites showing ornamentation and macrosculpture of cuticle (A-B), detailed views of carapace (C-D) and of tergite V (E-F), dorsal aspect. (A, C, E) Male holotype (AMNH, Peria Creek). (B, D, F) Female paratype (AMNH, Peria Creek). Scale lines: 5 mm (A-B), 2 mm (C-F).

    img-z133-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 95.

    Hormurus maiwa sp. nov., pedipalp chela (A-E), patella (F-J), femur and trochanter (K-O), dorsal (A-B, F-G, K-L), retrolateral (C, H, M), ventral (D, I, N) and prolateral (E, J, O) aspects showing trichobothria pattern. (A, F, K) Female paratype (AMNH, Peria Creek). (B-E, G-J, L-O) Male holotype (AMNH, Peria Creek). Scale lines: 5 mm.

    img-z134-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 96.

    Hormurus maiwa sp. nov., left pedipalp chelae, retrolateral aspect showing dentate margin of chela fingers (A-B), dorsal aspect showing dentate margin of movable finger (C), ventral aspect showing dentate margin of fixed finger (D). (A, C-D) Male holotype (AMNH, Peria Creek). (B) Female paratype (AMNH, Peria Creek). Scale lines: 2 mm.

    img-z135-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 97.

    Hormurus maiwa sp. nov., leg coxae II-IV, sternum, genital operculum and pectines, ventral aspect (A, D), left pecten under UV light (B, E), anterior margin of coxae III (C, F). (A-C) Male holotype (AMNH, Peria Creek). (D-F) Female paratype (AMNH, Peria Creek). Scale lines: 2 mm (A, C-D, F), 2 mm (B, E).

    img-z137-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 98.

    Hormurus maiwa sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH, Peria Creek), right tarsi, ventral (A-D) and retrolateral (E) aspect. (A) Tarsus I. (B) Tarsus II. (C) Tarsus III. (D-E) Tarsus IV. Scale line: 2 mm.

    img-z139-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 99.

    Hormurus maiwa sp. nov., metasoma and telson, lateral (A-B) and ventral (C) aspects. (A) Female (AMNH, Peria Creek). (B-C) Male (AMNH, Peria Creek). Scale lines: 3 mm.

    img-z140-7_01.jpg

    Fig. 100.

    Hormurus maiwa sp. nov., left hemispermatophore of male holotype (AMNH, Peria Creek; A-D) and of male paratype (AMNH, Mt Dayman; E-H). (A, E) Lateral aspect. (B, F) anterior aspect. (C, G) Rotated approximately 45° counter-clockwise from anterior aspect. (D, H) Contralateral aspect. Scale lines: 1 mm.

    img-z141-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 101.

    (A) Known localities of Hormurus maiwa sp. nov. in the northern foothills of Mount Dayman in the Maneau Range, at the eastern tip of mainland New Guinea, Milne Bay Province. The color gradient indicates topography and bathymetry. (B) Maps of the fourth Archbold Expedition to New Guinea organised by the AMNH. Reproduced from Brass (1956). Localities of material treated in the present contribution are indicated with red squares: 1 - Menapi (type locality of Hormurus menapi sp. nov.); 6 - N slope of Mt Dayman; 8 - Peria Creek, Kwagira River, 50 m; 12 - Camp 2 (900 m), eastern slopes of Goodenough Island. Locality record of Hormurus sp. (Remarks about this specimen given in the section “Unidentified specimens”).

    img-z142-1_01.jpg

    Hormurus papuanus Kraepelin, 1914
    Figs 4C, 102-110, Tab. 11

  • Hormurus papuanus Kraepelin, 1914: 333. – Kopstein, 1921: 138 (part). – Monod, 2011a (part): 22, 532, 536, 686-689, fig. 122. – Monod et al., 2019: 148-151, 200, fig. 31, tab. 1.

  • Liocheles caudicula papuanus (Kraepelin, 1914).Takashima, 1945: 96.

  • Liocheles karschii (Keyserling, 1885). – L.E. Koch, 1977: 173-172 (part).

  • Liocheles papuanus.Monod, 2000: 113-117, pls 51-55, map 15. – Monod, 2011a: 16.

  • Material: ZMH (ZMH-A0015414); ♂ lectotype; [Papua New Guinea], SW Küste Neu Pommern [SW coast of New Britain], Liebliche Inseln [Arawe Islands] [6°06′07″S 148°59′53″E]; 11.-12.XII.1908, 05.I.1909, 26.-31.I.1909; leg. G. Duncker, Hamburg Südsee Expedition. – ZMH (ZMH-A0015416); 1 ♂, 4 ♀, 6 imm. ♂, 6 imm. ♀ paralectotypes, same data as for lectotype (2 T. under Steinen [two animals under rocks], 2 T. in moderndem Holz [two animals in decaying logs]). – MHNG-ARTO-26553; 1 ♂, 1 ♀paralectotypes; same data as for lectotype. – ZMH (ZMH-A0015415); 1 ♂, [Papua New Guinea], Neu Pommern [New Britain], Möre Hafen [Kandrian] [6°11′24″S 149°32′51″E], Unterlauf des Wasserfall-Fl. [downstream of waterfall]; 13.-14.XII.1908, 20.-24. II.1909; leg. G. Duncker, Hamburg Südsee Expedition.

  • Diagnosis: Coxae II-III of H. papuanus bear knob-like anterodistal processes in males and females (Fig. 106A, C-E, G-H). These structures are more strongly developed in males than females, more strongly developed on coxae III than on coxae II in both sexes and less strongly developed in immatures than in adults. They are absent in all other Papuan Hormurus except H. ancylolobus sp. nov. where there are hook-like (Fig. 70B, D-E) instead of knob-like. Moreover, metasoma segment V bears 14 ventral macrosetae in H. papuanus, i.e. four pairs (anterior, median, supramedian and posterior) on the ventrosubmedian carinae and four pairs (anterior, supramedian and posterior) on the ventrolateral carinae (Fig. 108C), whereas most other Papuan congeners possess a higher macrosetal count. Exceptions are H. araiaspathe sp. nov. (Figs 4B, 18B) and H. barai sp. nov. (Figs 4A, 28C), which possesses between 12 and 14 ventral macrosetae on metasoma segment V. The sole known specimen of H. sibonai sp. nov. also bears 13 ventral macrosetae on metasoma segment V (Fig. 145B), but this is most likely an anomalous pattern with three unexpressed macrosetae.

  • Description of adult male (lectotype): Colouration (Fig. 102A-B): Dorsal surface of chelicera manus dark orange with brown infuscation, more pronounced anteriorly; fingers black. Carapace reddish brown, median ocular region black. Tergites brown. Pedipalps reddish brown; carinae and fingers black. Legs only slightly paler than tergites, light brown to dark orange, prolateral carina of femora black. Coxapophysis I light brown, anterior tip pale yellow; coxapophysis II black; leg coxae and sternum light brown with lighter orange spots; sternites III-VI brown with yellow posterior margin; sternite VII dark brown; genital operculum and pectines pale yellow. Metasoma reddish brown with darker infuscation; telson paler than metasoma, vesicle orange, aculeus reddish brown.

  • Cuticle: Nongranular surfaces of carapace, pedipalps, legs, mesosoma and metasoma finely punctate.

  • Carapace (Fig. 103A, C): Anterior margin with median notch moderately excavated. Anterior furcated sutures distinct. Median ocular tubercle slightly raised; median ocelli present, at least twice the size of lateral ocelli, separated from each other by approximately half the diameter of a median ocellus. Three pairs of lateral ocelli, equal in size, equidistant and adjacent to each other. Surfaces minutely and sparsely granular, except for smooth anterior areas of frontal lobes and median ocular area.

  • Chelicerae: Basal and median teeth of fixed finger fused into bicusp. Dorsal margin of movable finger with four teeth (one basal, one median, one subdistal and one distal); dorsal distal tooth smaller than ventral distal tooth; ventral margin smooth.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 102A-B, 104B-E, G-J, L-O): Segments rather short and stout, femur length approximately equal to that of carapace. Chela almost asetose.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 105A, C-D): Fixed finger: basal lobe well developed and conical; suprabasal notch distinct and deep; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to median lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; single row of scattered denticles basally. Movable finger: basal lobe absent; suprabasal lobe well developed, conical, gently rounded dorsally and lacking sharp conical tooth, not overlapping with fixed finger; suprabasal lobe and corresponding notch on fixed finger contiguous, no proximal gap or at most reduced gap only evident when fingers closed; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to suprabasal lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; few sparse denticles basally. Pedipalp carinae: Femur (Fig. 104L-O): proventral carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; promedian carinae absent; prodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, similarly developed as proventral carina; retrodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, less developed than prodorsal carina, more distinct in proximal third of segment; retroventral carina visible as a ridge of medium to large spiniform granules, distinctly more developed than retrodorsal carina; ventromedian carina obsolete, only discernible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules. Patella (Fig. 104G-J): proventral carina discernible as costate ridge proximally, obsolete distally; promedian and prodorsal carinae visible as ridges with medium-sized spiniform granules, equally developed, fused medially into prominent spiniform process with pointed medially located apex; dorsomedian carina only visible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retrodorsal carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; paired retromedian carinae fused and visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina costate-granular (composed of medium-sized spiniform granules). Chela manus (Fig. 104B-E): proventral and promedian carinae visible as faint ridges with medium-sized spiniform granules, equally developed; prodorsal carina obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; dorsomedian carina visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, more strongly developed than prodorsal carina; dorsal secondary carina obsolete; digital carina visible as a ridge of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, less distinct in distal area, more developed than retromedian carina; fused retromedian carinae obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules proximally; retrolateral secondary carina vestigial, only distinct proximal to condyle of movable finger, developed as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium to large granules); ventromedian carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules.

  • Pedipalp macrosculpture: Femur (Fig. 104L-O): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small spiniform granules; dorsal intercarinal surface densely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral intercarinal surface smooth or nearly so (only few scattered granules distally); large part of ventral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, distal third smooth. Patella (Fig. 104G-J): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with faint and sparse reticulate network of anastomosed medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela manus (Fig. 104B-E): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth proximally; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized anastomosed spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela fingers densely covered with small spiniform granules in proximal half, surface smooth or nearly so distally, ventral surface smooth; trichobothria dst, dsb and db together in a single large smooth depression.

  • Trichobothria: Pedipalp orthobothriotaxic, accessory trichobothria absent. Patella (Fig. 104G-J): d2 trichobothrium distal to patellar process; five eb trichobothria arranged in two groups (eb1+eb4-5 and eb2-3); two esb, two em and one est trichobotria arranged in three (esb1, esb2+em1-2 and est) or two groups (esb1 and esb2+ em1-2+est); three et trichobothria; three v trichobothria. Chela manus (Fig. 104B-E): Dt situated in proximal half of manus; Eb3 close to Eb1-2; Esb closer to Est than to Eb group, sometimes aligned with Est; Est situated near midpoint; four V trichobothria, V3 distant from V4. Fixed chela finger with db situated on dorsal surface; esb equidistant from eb and est, or nearly so; eb situated at base of finger, proximal to point of articulation between fixed and movable fingers; two i trichobothria.

  • Coxosternum (Fig. 106A, C-D): Coxa II with small knob-like anterodistal process. Coxa III with strongly developed knob-like anterodistal process. Sternum equilateral pentagonal (anterior width slightly greater than posterior width), as wide as long.

  • Legs (Fig. 107): Femora I-IV with ventral surfaces bicarinate, pro- and retroventral carinae granular. Retrolateral margins of tibiae I-II without setiform macrosetae. Basitarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral rows each with 3/4, 4/5, 4/5 and 4/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively. Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral row each with 3-4/4, 4/4, 4-5/4-5 and 4-5/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively; retroventral row with one proximal spinule; ventromedian spinules absent. Ungues shorter than telotarsus, half its length or less.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 106A): Composed of two subtriangular sclerites.

  • Pectines (Fig. 106A-B): Short, distal edge not reaching distal edge of coxa IV; fulcrae and three marginal lamellae present. Pectinal teeth count 8-10; teeth straight, entirely covered with sensory papillae.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 102A-B, 103A, E): Pre-tergites I-VII and posterior margins of pre-tergites smooth. Post-tergites: posterior margins of tergites I-VI sublinear, without distinct projection; lateral transversal sulcus present; intercarinal surfaces of I-III medially smooth, laterally granular; intercarinal surfaces of IV-VII almost totally smooth, faintly granular along lateral margins; intercarinal surfaces of III-VII with faint reticulate network of ridges and dimples. Respiratory stigmata (spiracles) of sternites IV-VI short, their length less than width of sternite III, and distinctly crescent shaped. Sternite VII acarinate.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 108B-C): Not markedly compressed laterally; sparsely and minutely granular, posterior segments less so (segment V almost smooth); dorsal intercarinal surface of V smooth and shiny medially; distinct dorsomedian sulcus on segments I-IV, much less pronounced on segment V (usually only faintly expressed anteriorly).

  • Metasoma carinae: Segments I-IV: dorsolateral carinae obsolete on all segments; lateral median carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); lateral inframedian carinae discernible anteriorly as a faint ridge on segment I, absent on other segments; ventrolateral carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); paired ventrosubmedian carinae weakly developed (as low ridges). Segment V: dorsolateral and lateral median carinae obsolete; ventrolateral carinae only expressed as faint ridges; ventrosubmedian carinae fused, only expressed as a faint ridge in anterior two-thirds.

  • Metasoma spination: Segments I-II: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules. Segments III-IV: dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carina without large spiniform granules. Segment V: ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae without distinct granules or spines; anal arch crenulate.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: Segment I with eight macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and one pair (anterior) on lateral carinae; segments II-IV each with ten macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae; segment V with 14 macrosetae, i.e. four pairs (anterior, median, supramedian and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and three pairs (anterior, supramedian and posterior) on ventrolateral carinae.

  • Telson (Fig. 108B): Slightly longer than metasoma segment V; vesicle smooth, without granules; aculeus short (its length less than half of vesicle length), sharply curved.

  • Hemispermatophore (Fig. 109): Stalk distinctly longer than stem. Distal lamina curved, without distal crest on anterior margin; single laminar hook, median, situated between 3/7 and 1/2 from base of stalk (basal part/distal lamina ratio = 0.8-1.01; median = 0.85); transverse ridge distinct, more proximal than base of laminar hook, merging with anterior margin more proximally than base of laminar hook. Capsule: hemisolenos thin, folded on itself only proximally and above that unfolded to flattened distal tip (tip and base approximately of same width), without lateral longitudinal carina, laterodistal accessory hook or medioposterior accessory apophysis; tip of hemisolenos more proximal than base of laminar hook, more distal than tip of clasper. Clasper well developed, forming distinct hump, not hook-like, without anterior accessory process. Subex well developed, spoon-shaped, merging anteriorly with base of clasper; posterior edge forming obtuse angle (>90°) with hemisolenos; anterior edge forming right angle (90°) with hemisolenos.

  • Description of adult female: Same characters as for male except as follows. Colouration (Fig. 102C-D): Legs slightly darker than in male, almost as dark as tergites.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 102C-D, 104A, F, K): Segments not noticeably shorter or more robust than in male.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 105B): Dentate margins linear or nearly so, without pronounced lobe and notch, with two rows of primary denticles extending from tip to base of fingers and bearing large inner accessory denticles.

  • Carapace (Fig. 103B, D): Posteromedian margin smooth.

  • Coxosternum (Fig. 106E, G-H): Knob-like anterodistal processes of coxae II-III less pronouced than in male.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 106E): Oval to semi-oval, slightly longer than wide (length/width ratio = 1.07-1.08, median = 1.07); opercular sclerites partly fused, with distinct median suture; posterior notch present, at least weakly developed.

  • Pectines (Fig. 106E-F): Short, distal edge not reaching distal edge of coxa IV. Pectinal teeth count 7-9; teeth short and straight, sensory papillae covering only distal half.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 102C-D, 103B, F): Post-tergites: reticulate network of ridges and dimples more distinct than in male; intercarinal surfaces of I-VII almost totally smooth, faintly granular along lateral and posterior margins.

  • Intraspecific variation: Pedipalp trichobothria: On the retrolateral side of the pedipalp chela trichobothrium Esb in some specimens is more distal, aligning with Est. Leg spination: The number of setiform macrosetae varies from three to four in the proventral row of telotarsi I, and from four to five in the proventral rows of telotarsi III-IV and in the retroventral rows of telotarsi III.

  • Genital operculum: The length/width ratio varies from 1.07 to 1.08 (median = 1.07).

  • Pectines: The pectinal teeth count varies from eight to ten in males and from seven to nine in females.

  • Metasoma: Spination: Segment II may have one more spiniform granule expressed in the subposterior group. In males a subposterior spiniform granule may be expressed on one of the ventrosubmedian carinae of segment III.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: One fewer macroseta may be expressed in the supramedian group of segment IV, resulting in a total of nine macrosetae instead of ten.

  • Hemispermatophores: The basal part/distal lamina ratio varies from 0.8 to 1.02 (median = 0.85).

  • Distribution and ecology: Hormurus papuanus is known only from the south-western coast of New Britain, the largest island of the Bismark Archipelago, off the northeastern coast of New Guinea (Fig. 110). Specimens were collected under stones and in decaying logs, some close to a stream.

  • Remarks: The type specimens were collected by (Paul) Georg (Egmont) Duncker during the Hamburg Südsee-Expedition (1908-1910) in the Bismarck Archipelago (Thilenius, 1927). Kraepelin (1914) listed 23 specimens from Neu Pommern (New Britain) and Neu Guinea (New Guinea) in his original description of this species. Among this material two specimens from Finschhafen (Papua New Guinea mainland) belong to a different species which is described below as Hormurus krausi sp. nov.

  • Table 11.

    Hormurus papuanus Kraepelin, 1914, measurements (in mm), repositories and inventory numbers of adult males and female.

    img-z144-2_01.gif

    (continued).

    img-z145-2_01.gif

    Fig. 102.

    Hormurus papuanus Kraepelin, 1914, habitus, dorsal (A, C) and ventral (B, D) aspect. (A-B) Male lectotype (ZMH). (C-D) Female paralectotype (MHNG-ARTO-26553). Scale lines: 10 mm.

    img-z146-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 103.

    Hormurus papuanus Kraepelin, 1914, carapace and mesosomal tergites showing ornamentation and macrosculpture of cuticle (A-B), detailed views of carapace (C-D) and of tergite V (E-F), dorsal aspect. (A, C, E) Male lectotype (ZMB). (B, D, F) Female paralectotype (MHNG-ARTO-26553). Scale lines: 3 mm (A-B), 2 mm (C-F).

    img-z147-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 104.

    Hormurus papuanus Kraepelin, 1914, pedipalp chela (A-E), patella (F-J), femur and trochanter (K-O), dorsal (A-B, F-G, K-L), retrolateral (C, H, M), ventral (D, I, N) and prolateral (E, J, O) aspects showing trichobothria pattern. (A, F, K) Female paralectotype (MHNG-ARTO-26553). (B-E, G-J, L-O) Male lectotype (ZMH). Scale lines: 3 mm.

    img-z150-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 105.

    Hormurus papuanus Kraepelin, 1914, left pedipalp chelae, retrolateral aspect showing dentate margin of chela fingers (A-B), dorsal aspect showing dentate margin of movable finger (C), ventral aspect showing dentate margin of fixed finger (D). (A, C-D) Male lectotype (ZMH). (B) Female paralectotype (MHNG-ARTO-26553). Scale lines: 2 mm.

    img-z151-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 106.

    Hormurus papuanus Kraepelin, 1914, coxae II-IV, sternum, genital operculum and pectines, ventral aspect (A, E), left pecten under UV light (B, F), anterior margin of coxae III (C-D, G-H). (A-C) Male lectotype (ZMH). (E-G) Female paralectotype (MHNG-ARTO-26553). (D) Juvenile male paralectotype (ZMH). (H) Juvenile female paralectotype (ZMH). Scale lines: 2 mm (A, C, E, G), 1 mm (B, D, F, H).

    img-z152-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 107.

    Hormurus papuanus Kraepelin, 1914, male lectotype (ZMH), right tarsi, ventral (A-D) and retrolateral (E) aspect. (A) Tarsus I. (B) Tarsus II. (C) Tarsus III. (D-E) Tarsus IV. Scale line: 2 mm.

    img-z153-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 108.

    Hormurus papuanus Kraepelin, 1914, metasoma and telson, lateral (A-B) and ventral (C) aspects. (A) Female paralectotype (MHNG-ARTO-26553). (B-C) Male lectotype (ZMH). Scale lines: 3 mm.

    img-z154-10_01.jpg

    Fig. 109.

    Hormurus papuanus Kraepelin, 1914, male lectotype (ZMH), left hemispermatophore. (A) Lateral aspect. (B) Anterior aspects. (C) Rotated approximately 45° counter-clockwise from anterior aspect. (D) Contralateral aspect. Scale line: 1 mm.

    img-z155-8_01.jpg

    Fig. 110.

    (A) Known localities of Hormurus papuanus Kraepelin, 1914 near the south-western coast of New Britain, the largest island of the Bismark Archipelago, Papua New Guinea. The color gradient indicates topography and bathymetry. (B) Map of the Hamburger Südsee Expedition to German New Guinea (reproduced from Thilenius, 1927) showing the precise itinerary with date and geographic coordinates for each recorded locality. Localities relevant to the type series of H. papuanus are highlighted in red.

    img-z156-1_01.jpg

    Hormurus sporacanthophorus Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.
    Figs 111-112, 113A, 114-121, Tab. 12

  • This species was treated under the manuscript name “Hormurus asychnacaena” in Monod (2011a: 281, 532, 538, figs 16, 36).

  • Material: AMNH (without registration number); ♂ holotype; Papua New Guinea, Morobe Province, Lae, Botanical Garden [6°42′56″S, 146°59′14″E]; 18.VII.1964; leg. R. Zweifel & G. Sluder. – ZMB 7204; 1 ♀ paratype; Neu Guinea, [Madang Province], Astrolabe Bay? (see remarks below); leg. R. Rohde. – MHNG-ARTO-26376; 1 ♀ paratype; Morobe Province, Bukaua [6°43′33″S, 147°21′25″E], 35 miles W of Lae, near shore (beach); 26.XII.1972; leg. K.W. Ströder. – ZMB 15165; 3 ♀ paratypes; D. N. Guinea, [Morobe Province], Huon Gulf, Bukaua (Kap Arkona); [III-VII.1909]; leg. R.G. Neuhauss. – USNM 04167; 1 subadult ♂ paratype; New Guinea Area, 135 Med Group, APO 322, Unit 1. c/o PM San Fransisco [Morobe Province, Finschhafen (see remarks below), 6°33′29″S, 147°50′47″E]; 25.IX.1944. – BMNH 1934.2.10.10; 1 subadult ♀ paratype; [Oro Province], Kokoda [8°34′55″S, 147°15′8″E], 1200 ft; 1934; leg. L.E. Cheesman. – BMNH 1922.2.25.2; 1 subadult ♀ paratype; [Morobe Province], Huon Gulf, Lababia [7°17′57″S, 147°7′55″E]; acquisition 9.IV.1922 [probably collected in III.-IV.1920]; leg. W. Potter. – BMNH 1922.2.25.3; 1 subadult ♂ paratype; [Morobe Province], Huon Gulf, Lababia [7°17′57″S, 147°7′55″E]; 9.IV.1922; leg. W. Potter. – ZMB 15164; 1 ♂ paratype; [Morobe Province], Peiowa [Peihowa, 7°32′10″S, 147°22′41″E]; 1912; Reichsgesundheitsamt [Imperial Health Office].

  • Etymology: The name sporacanthophorus is the Latinized version of the ancient Greek words “σπoράς” [scattered], “ἄκανθα” [thorn, prickle] and “φoρεύς” [bearer, carrier]. The epithet is an invariable noun in apposition and refers to the unusually scattered granulation of the pedipalp cuticular surfaces (Fig. 113A).

  • Diagnosis: Hormurus sporacanthophorus sp. nov. differs from other Papuan species by the following combination of characters: (1) the median ocular tubercle is distinctly higher and more prominent (Fig. 114) than in any other Papuan species; (2) the suprabasal notch of the fixed finger on the pedipalp chelae of males is much shallower and the suprabasal lobe of the movable finger much weaker (represented by a low hump, Fig. 116A) than in the remaining taxa; (3) the retrodorsal carina of the pedipalp patella is distinct (Fig. 115G-H), whereas in all other Papuan Hormurus except H. ancylolobus sp. nov. it is obsolete and only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of spiniform granules; (4) the intercarinal surfaces of the pedipalp segments are more sparsely granular than in the other species, a difference that is particularly obvious for the dorsal and retrolateral surfaces (Fig. 113A); (5) the pectinal teeth count is the highest of any Papuan species (12-13 for males and 9-11 for females, Fig. 117), only H. ancylolobus sp. nov. gets close to that number (9-10 for females, unknown for males, Fig. 70B-C).

  • Description of adult male (holotype): Colouration (Fig. 112A-B): Dorsal surface of chelicera manus dark brown with black infuscation, more pronounced anteriorly; fingers black. Carapace reddish brown, median ocular region black. Tergites brown. Pedipalps reddish brown; carinae and fingers black. Legs paler than tergites, orange to yellow, prolateral carina of femora black. Coxapophysis I light brown, its anterior tip pale yellow; coxapophysis II reddish brown to black; coxae I-II and sternum dark orange, coxae II-III lighter than coxae I-II, orange to yellow; sternites III-VI brown, posterior half of V dark yellow; sternite VII dark brown to almost black; genital operculum and pectines pale orange to yellow. Metasoma reddish brown with darker infuscation; telson paler than metasoma, vesicle orange, aculeus reddish brown.

  • Cuticle: Nongranular surfaces of carapace, pedipalps, legs, mesosoma and metasoma finely punctate.

  • Carapace (Fig. 114A, C): Anterior margin with median notch moderately excavated. Anterior furcated sutures distinct. Median ocular tubercle distinctly raised; median ocelli present, at least twice the size of lateral ocelli, separated from each other by approximately the diameter of a median ocellus. Three pairs of lateral ocelli, equal in size, equidistant and adjacent to one another. Surfaces densely granular (with small to medium-sized granules), except for smooth frontal lobes and median ocular area. Chelicerae: Basal and median teeth of fixed finger fused into a bicusp. Dorsal margin of movable finger with four teeth (one basal, one median, one subdistal and one distal); dorsal distal tooth smaller than ventral distal tooth; ventral margin smooth.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 112A-B, 115B-E, G-J, L-O): Segments long and slender, femur slightly longer than carapace. Chela almost asetose.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 116A, C-D): Fixed finger: basal lobe weakly developed; suprabasal notch shallow; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to median lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; single row of denticles basally. Movable finger: basal lobe absent; suprabasal lobe weakly developed (as a low hump), gently rounded dorsally and lacking sharp conical tooth, not overlapping with fixed finger; suprabasal lobe and corresponding notch on fixed finger contiguous, no proximal gap or at most reduced gap only evident when fingers closed; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to suprabasal lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; single row of sparse denticles basally.

  • Pedipalp carinae: Femur (Fig. 115L-O): proventral carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized to large spiniform granules; promedian carinae absent; prodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized to large spiniform granules, similarly developed as proventral carina; retrodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized to large spiniform granules, similarly developed as prodorsal carina; retroventral carina visible as a ridge of medium to large spiniform granules, only slightly more developed than retrodorsal carina; ventromedian carina obsolete, only discernible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules. Patella (Fig. 115G-J): proventral carina discernible as costate ridge proximally, obsolete distally; promedian and prodorsal carinae visible as ridges with medium-sized to large spiniform granules, equally developed, fused medially into prominent spiniform process with medially located pointed apex; dorsomedian carina only visible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retrodorsal carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; paired retromedian carinae fused and visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized to large spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium-sized to large granules). Chela manus (Fig. 115B-E): proventral and promedian carinae visible as faint ridges with medium-sized to large spiniform granules, equally developed; prodorsal carina obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized to large spiniform granules; dorsomedian carina visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized to large spiniform granules, more strongly developed than prodorsal carina; dorsal secondary carina obsolete; digital carina visible as a ridge of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, less distinct in distal area, more developed than retromedian carina; fused retromedian carinae obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules proximally; retrolateral secondary carina vestigial, only discernible proximal to condyle of movable finger as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium to large granules); ventromedian carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules.

  • Pedipalp macrosculpture: Femur (Fig. 115L-O): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules; dorsal intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth proximally; ventral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, distal third smooth. Patella (Fig. 115G-J): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces sparsely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with faint and sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, proximal and distal areas smooth. Chela manus (Fig. 115B-E): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth proximally; dorsal intercarinal surface with faint and sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; retrolateral intercarinal surface with faint and sparse reticulate network of small to medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with faint and sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela fingers sparsely covered with small spiniform granules in proximal half, smooth or nearly so distally, ventral surface smooth; trichobothria dst, dsb and db each in single smooth depression.

  • Trichobothria: Pedipalp orthobothriotaxic, accessory trichobothria absent. Patella (Fig. 115G-J): d2 trichobothrium distal to patellar process; five eb trichobothria arranged in two groups (eb1+eb4-5 and eb2-3); two esb, two em and one est trichobotria arranged in three (esb1, esb2+em1-2 and est) or four (esb1, esb2, em1-2 and est) groups; three et trichobothria; three v trichobothria. Chela manus (Fig. 115B-E): Dt situated in proximal third of manus; Eb3 close to Eb1-2; Esb closer to Est than to Eb group, usually aligned with Est, sometimes slightly more distal; Est situated near midpoint; four V trichobothria, V3 distant from V4. Fixed chela finger with db situated on dorsal surface; esb distinctly closer to eb than to est; eb situated at base of finger, proximal to point of articulation between fixed and movable fingers; two i trichobothria.

  • Coxosternum (Fig. 117A, C): Anterior margin of coxa III elongated distally, without anterodistal process. Sternum equilateral pentagonal (anterior width slightly greater than posterior width), almost as long as wide.

  • Legs (Fig. 118): Femora I-IV with ventral surfaces bicarinate, pro- and retroventral carinae granular. Retrolateral margins of tibiae I-II without setiform macrosetae. Basitarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral rows each with 4/4, 4/5, 4/5 and 4/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively. Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral row each with 3-4/4, 3-4/4, 4-5/4-5 and 4-5/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively; retroventral row with one proximal spinule; ventromedian spinules absent. Ungues shorter than telotarsus, half its length or less.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 117A): Composed of two subtriangular sclerites.

  • Pectines (Fig. 117A-B): Moderately elongated, distal edge reaching but not extending beyond distal edge of coxa IV; fulcrae and three marginal lamellae present. Pectinal teeth count 12-13; teeth straight, entirely covered with sensory papillae.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 112A-B, 114A, E): Pre-tergites I-VII and posterior margins of pre-tergites smooth. Post-tergites: posterior margins of tergites I-VI sublinear, without distinct projection; lateral transversal sulcus present; intercarinal surfaces of I-VII finely and densely granular, with reticulate network of ridges and dimples. Respiratory stigmata (spiracles) of sternites IV-VI long, their length at least one third of sternite width, and distinctly crescent shaped. Sternite VII acarinate.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 119B-C): Not markedly compressed laterally; sparsely and minutely granular, posterior segments less so (segment V smooth or nearly so); dorsal intercarinal surface of V smooth and shiny medially; distinct dorsomedian sulcus on segments I-IV, much less pronounced on segment V (usually only faintly expressed anteriorly).

  • Metasoma carinae: Segments I-IV: dorsolateral carinae obsolete on all segments; lateral median carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); lateral inframedian carinae distinct anteriorly, visible as a faint ridge on segment I, absent on other segments; ventrolateral carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); paired ventrosubmedian carinae weakly developed (as low ridges). Segment V: dorsolateral and lateral median carinae obsolete; ventrolateral carinae only expressed as faint ridges; ventrosubmedian carinae fused, only expressed as a faint ridge in anterior two-thirds.

  • Metasoma spination: Segments I-IV: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carinae without large spiniform granules. Segment V: ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae with scattered minute spiniform granules; anal arch crenulate.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: Segment I with eight macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and one pair (anterior) on lateral carinae; segments II-IV each with ten macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae; segment V with 16 macrosetae, i.e. four pairs (anterior, median, subposterior and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and four pairs (anterior, supramedian, subposterior and posterior) on ventrolateral carinae.

  • Telson (Fig. 119B): Longer than metasoma segment V; vesicle smooth, without granules; aculeus short (less than half of vesicle length), sharply curved.

  • Hemispermatophore (Fig. 120): Stalk distinctly longer than stem. Distal lamina curved, without distal crest on anterior margin; single laminar hook, median, situated between positions 3/7 and 1/2 from base of stalk (basal part/distal lamina ratio = 0.74-0.98; median = 0.88); transverse ridge distinct, more proximal than base of laminar hook, merging with anterior margin more proximally than base of laminar hook. Capsule: hemisolenos thin, folded on itself only proximally and above that unfolded to flattened distal tip (tip and base approximately of same width), without lateral longitudinal carina, laterodistal accessory hook or medioposterior accessory apophysis; tip of hemisolenos more proximal than base of laminar hook, more distal than tip of clasper. Clasper well developed, forming distinct hump, not hook-like, with small anterior knob-like accessory process. Subex well developed, spoon-shaped, merging anteriorly with base of clasper; posterior edge forming obtuse angle (>90°) with hemisolenos; anterior edge forming right angle (90°) with hemisolenos.

  • Description of adult female: Same characters as male except as follows. Colouration (Fig. 112C-D): Legs slightly darker than in male, almost as dark as tergites. Pedipalps (Figs 112C-D, 115A, F, K): Segments noticeably shorter or more robust than in male.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 116B): Dentate margins linear or nearly so, without pronounced lobe and notch, with two rows of primary denticles extending from tip to base of fingers and bearing large inner accessory denticles.

  • Legs: Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral row each with 3-4/4, 4/4, 4-5/3-5 and 4-5/4-5 setiform macrosetae.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 117D): Oval to semi-oval, slightly longer than wide (length/width ratio = 1-1.12, median = 1.04); opercular sclerites partly fused, with distinct median suture; posterior notch present, at least weakly developed.

  • Pectines (Fig. 117D-E): Short, distal edge not reaching distal edge of coxa IV. Pectinal teeth count 9-11; teeth short and straight, sensory papillae covering only distal two-thirds.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 112C-D, 114B, F): Post-tergites: reticulate network of ridges and dimples on segments III-VII more distinct than in male; intercarinal surfaces of I-II medially smooth, laterally granular; intercarinal surfaces of III-VI almost totally smooth, faintly granular along lateral margins; intercarinal surfaces of VII faintly granular, in proximal half smooth.

  • Intraspecific variation: Pedipalp trichobothria: On the retrolateral side of pedipalp patella trichobothrium esb1 is in some specimens located midway between esb2 and em1-2 rather than close to esb2, resulting in four groups (esb1, esb2, em1-2 and est) instead of three (esb1-2, em1-2 and est). On the retrolateral side of the pedipalp chela Esb may be slightly more proximal than Est, resulting in the two trichobothria not aligning with each other.

  • Leg spination: The number of setiform macrosetae varies from three to four proventrally on telotarsi I-II, from three to five retrolaterally on telotarsi III, from four to five proventrally on telotarsi III-IV and from four to five retroventrally on telotarsi IV.

  • Female genital operculum: The length/width ratio varies from 1 to 1.12 (median = 1.04).

  • Pectines: The pectinal teeth count varies from 12 to 13 in males and from nine to 11 in females.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: Rarely one more macroseta may be expressed in the supramedian group of segment I, resulting in a total of nine macrosetae instead of eight. Segments II-IV may possess eight or nine instead of ten macrosetae (one or two macroseta not expressed) and segment V 13 to 15 instead of 16 (one to three macrosetae not expressed).

  • Hemispermatophores: The basal part/distal lamina ratio varies from 0.74 to 0.98 (median = 0.88).

  • Distribution and ecology: Hormurus sporacanthophorus sp. nov. is known from the coasts of Huon Bay in Morobe Province, and from one locality further inland in Oro Province (Fig. 121). The record from Astrolabe Bay is considered doubtful (see Remarks). Specimens of this species were collected together with specimens of Hormurus krausi sp. nov. at two localities, i.e. Lae and Bukaua. The two species occur syntopically in at least parts of their ranges.

  • Remarks: Ricardo Rohde was a collector who operated in South America (Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay) from 1885 to 1886 before joining the German New Guinea Company in 1887 (Von den Steinen, 2010; Holdings of the archives of the Berliner Gesellschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie und Urgeschichte,  http://www.bgaeu.de/BGAEU-EH.htm, accessed 5.II.2021). He was based in New Guinea at least until 1891 and collected during this period in Stephansort and Finschhafen (Wichmann, 1912; Froddin & Gressit, 1982). The specimen with registration number ZMB 7204 was among two other lots (ZMB 7415 and ZMB 7603) labelled as collected in Astrolabe Bay. This locality is considered as doubful for H. sporacanthophorus sp. nov. It is imprecise and out of the distribution range assessed from verified records which mostly encompasses the coastal regions of Huon Gulf. Because Rohde also collected in this geographic area (Finschhafen), it is possibly a case of mislabelling. Richard Gustav Neuhauss was a German physician who travelled in former German New Guinea from 1908 to 1910 in order to conduct anthropological and ethnological studies (Neuhauss, 1909, 1911), and also to collect botanical and zoological samples. On March 15, 1909 he travelled from Sattelberg via Finschhafen to Huon Gulf, establishing himself in Bukaua (Kap Arkona) for the next four months. He made several expeditions from Bukaua: a coastal trip to the English boundary, two expeditions up the Markham River and a trip to the village of Taminugetu. He left Bukaua on July 14, 1909. The three specimens of H. sporacanthophorus sp. nov. with registration number ZMB 15165 must have been collected during this period.

  • The label data for the specimen under registration number USNM 04167 indicates an Army Postal Office (APO) number. APOs were used during WW II to deliver and send mail to military units on the front lines without going through the regular post offices. Each APO was issued a specific number. APO 322 indicates that the person who collected and sent the specimen, probably an American military officer, was stationed in Finschhafen, Papua New Guinea (Anonymous, 1949).

  • Lucy Evelyn Cheesman was a British entomologist and explorer. Between 1933 and 1939 she made three solo expeditions to New Guinea under the auspices of the British Museum, London (Garner & Touzel, 2018). The specimen from Kokoda was collected during her first expedition (Cheesman, 1935).

  • William Potter collected birds for the British Museum in Musom and Singaua (Huon Gulf) from March to April 1920 (Gilliard, 1969). The scorpions from Lababia (BMNH 1922.2.25.2-3) were possibly collected during the same expedition since Lababia is also located in the Huon Gulf.

  • Table 12.

    Hormurus sporacanthophorus sp. nov., measurements (in mm), repositories and inventory numbers of adult males and females.

    img-z158-2_01.gif

    Fig. 111.

    Hormurus sporacanthophorus sp. nov., habitus of male, dorsal aspect, reconstruction based on photographs. Scale line: 10 mm.

    img-z159-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 112.

    Hormurus sporacanthophorus sp. nov., habitus, dorsal (A, C) and ventral (B, D) aspects. (A-B) Male holotype (AMNH). (CD) Female paratype (ZMB 15165, Bukaua). Scale lines: 15 mm.

    img-z160-3_01.jpg

    Fig. 113.

    Morphosculptures of the dorsal surface of the pedilalpal chela in Papuan species of Hormurus. (A) Hormurus sporacanthophorus sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH). (B) Hormurus krausi sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP2715]). (C) Hormurus barai sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP3001]). Scale lines: 1 mm (A-B), 2 mm (C).

    img-z161-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 114.

    Hormurus sporacanthophorus sp. nov., carapace and mesosomal tergites showing ornamentation and macrosculpture of cuticle (A-B), detailed views of carapace (C-D) and of tergite V (E-F), dorsal aspect. (A, C, E) Male holotype (AMNH). (B, D, F) Female paratype (ZMB 15165, Bukaua). Scale lines: 5 mm (A-B), 2 mm (C-F).

    img-z163-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 115.

    Hormurus sporacanthophorus sp. nov., pedipalp chela (A-E), patella (F-J), femur and trochanter (K-O), dorsal (A-B, F-G, K-L), retrolateral (C, H, M), ventral (D, I, N) and prolateral (E, J, O) aspects showing trichobothria pattern. (A, F, K) Female paratype (ZMB 15165, Bukaua). (B-E, G-J, L-O) Male holotype (AMNH). Scale lines: 5 mm.

    img-z164-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 116.

    Hormurus sporacanthophorus sp. nov., left pedipalp chelae, retrolateral aspect showing dentate margin of chela fingers (AB), dorsal aspect showing dentate margin of movable finger (C), ventral aspect showing dentate margin of fixed finger (D). (A, C-D) Male holotype (AMNH). (B) Female paratype (ZMB 15165, Bukaua). Scale lines: 3 mm.

    img-z165-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 117.

    Hormurus sporacanthophorus sp. nov., coxae II-IV, sternum, genital operculum and pectines, ventral aspect (A, D), left pecten under UV light (B, E), anterior margin of coxae III (C, F). (A-C) Male holotype (AMNH). (D-F) Female paratype (MHNG-ARTO-26376). Scale lines: 3 mm (A, D), 2 mm (B-C, E-F).

    img-z166-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 118.

    Hormurus sporacanthophorus sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH), right tarsi, ventral (A-D) and retrolateral (E) aspect. (A) Tarsus I. (B) Tarsus II. (C) Tarsus III. (D-E) Tarsus IV. Scale line: 2 mm.

    img-z167-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 119.

    Hormurus sporacanthophorus sp. nov., metasoma and telson, lateral (A-B) and ventral (C) aspects. (A) Female paratype (MHNG-ARTO-26376). (B-C) Male holotype (AMNH). Dotted circles in C indicate the additional macrosetae expressed in some specimens. Scale lines: 5 mm.

    img-z168-8_01.jpg

    Fig. 120.

    Hormurus sporacanthophorus sp. nov., left hemispermatophore of male holotype (AMNH; A-D) and of male paratype (ZMB, Peihowa; E-H). (A, E) Lateral aspect. (B, F) Anterior aspect. (C, G) Rotated approximately 45° counter-clockwise from anterior aspect. (D, H) Contralateral aspect. The small anterior knob-like accessory processes present on the anterior side of the claspers is indicated by circles. Scale lines: 2 mm.

    img-z169-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 121.

    Known localities of Hormurus sporacanthophorus sp. nov. near the coasts of Huon Bay in Morobe Province and in Oro Province, Papua New Guinea. The color gradient indicates topography and bathymetry.

    img-z170-1_01.jpg

    Hormurus menapi Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.
    Figs 4D, 5C, 122-130, Tab. 13

  • Material: AMNH (without registration number); ♂holotype; Papua New Guinea, [Milne Bay Province], Cape Vogel Peninsula, Menapi [9°45′35″S, 149°55′54″E], camp 1; 21.III.-4.V.1953; leg. G.M. Tate, Archbold Expedition. – AMNH (without registration number); 2 ♀, 1 subadult ♂, 1 subadult ♀, 2 juvenile ♂, 1 juvenile ♀ paratypes; same data as for holotype. – AMNH (without registration number); 1 ♂, 2 ♀ paratypes; same data as for holotype.

  • Remark: Three female specimens from the series collected at Menapi camp 1 were not conspecific with H. menapi sp. nov. described below. They are listed below as an unidentified material because the absence of males prevents their differentiation from the other taxa treated in the present contribution.

  • Etymology: Menapi is the name of the village on the southern coast of Cape Vogel (Milne Bay Province) where the type specimens were collected. The epithet is an invariable name in apposition.

  • Diagnosis: Hormurus menapi sp. nov. is morphologically close to H. maiwa sp. nov. and H. cameroni sp. nov. and can be easily differentiated from these two species by its hemispermatophore morphology. The laminar hook is median (situated between positions 3/7 and 1/2 from the base of the stalk) in H. menapi sp. nov. (Fig. 129), whereas it is submedian (situated between 1/3 and 3/7 from the base of the stalk) in H. maiwa sp. nov. (Fig. 100) and H. cameroni sp. nov. (Fig. 81).

  • Description of adult male (holotype): Colouration (Fig. 122A-B): Dorsal surface of chelicera manus brown with black infuscation, more pronounced anteriorly; fingers black. Carapace reddish brown, median ocular region black. Tergites brown. Pedipalps reddish brown; carinae and fingers black. Legs paler than tergites, brown to orange dorsally, orange to yellow ventrally, prolateral carina of femora black. Coxapophysis I light brown, anterior tip pale yellow; coxapophysis II reddish brown to black; leg coxae light brown; sternum brown, lighter posterolaterally; sternites III-VI brown, posteromedian margin of V yellow; sternite VII dark brown to black posteriorly; genital operculum and pectines yellow. Metasoma reddish brown with darker infuscation; telson paler than metasoma, vesicle orange, aculeus reddish brown.

  • Cuticle: Nongranular surfaces of carapace, pedipalps, legs, mesosoma and metasoma finely punctate.

  • Carapace (Fig. 123A, C): Anterior margin with median notch moderately excavated. Anterior furcated sutures distinct; median ocular tubercle slightly raised; median ocelli present, at least twice the size of lateral ocelli, separated from each other by approximately the diameter of a median ocellus. Three pairs of lateral ocelli, equal in size, equidistant and adjacent to each other. Surfaces minutely and densely granular except for smooth frontal lobes (median longitudinal sulci and anterior furcated sulci granular) and median ocular area.

  • Chelicerae: Basal and median teeth of fixed finger fused into bicusp. Dorsal margin of movable finger with four teeth (one basal, one median, one subdistal and one distal); dorsal distal tooth smaller than ventral distal tooth; ventral margin smooth.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 122A-B, 124B-E, G-J, L-O): Segments long and slender, femur longer than carapace. Chela almost asetose.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 125A, C-D): Fixed finger: basal lobe well developed and conical; suprabasal notch distinct and deep; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to median lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent on suprabasal notch; a single row of denticles on basal lobe. Movable finger: basal lobe absent; suprabasal lobe well developed, conical, gently rounded dorsally and lacking sharp conical tooth, not overlapping with fixed finger; suprabasal lobe and corresponding notch on fixed finger contiguous, no proximal gap or at most reduced gap only evident when fingers closed; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to suprabasal lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent on suprabasal notch; few scattered denticles basally.

  • Pedipalp carinae: Femur (Fig. 124L-O): proventral carina developed as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; promedian carinae absent; prodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, similarly developed to proventral carina; retrodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, similarly developed as prodorsal carina; retroventral carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized to large spiniform granules, more developed than retrodorsal carina; ventromedian carina obsolete, only discernible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules. Patella (Fig. 124G-J): proventral carina discernible proximally as costate ridge, obsolete distally; promedian and prodorsal carinae visible as ridges with medium-sized to large spiniform granules, equally developed, fused medially into prominent spiniform process with pointed medially located apex; dorsomedian carina only visible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retrodorsal carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; paired retromedian carinae fused and visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium-sized spiniform granules). Chela manus (Fig. 124B-E): proventral and promedian carinae visible as faint ridges with medium-sized spiniform granules, equally developed; prodorsal carina obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; dorsomedian carina visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, more strongly developed than prodorsal carina; dorsal secondary carina obsolete; digital carina visible as a ridge of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, less distinct in distal area, more developed than retromedian carina; fused retromedian carinae obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules proximally; retrolateral secondary carina vestigial, only discernible proximal to condyle of movable finger as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium-sized granules); ventromedian carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules.

  • Pedipalp macrosculpture: Femur (Fig. 124L-O): Prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small spiniform granules; dorsal intercarinal surface densely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth proximally; ventral intercarinal surface densely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Patella (Fig. 124G-J): prolateral intercarinal surface densely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela manus (Fig. 124B-E): prolateral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth proximally; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela fingers densely covered with small spiniform granules in proximal half, smooth or nearly so distally, ventral surface smooth; trichobothria dst, dsb and db together in a single large smooth depression.

  • Trichobothria: Pedipalp orthobothriotaxic, accessory trichobothria absent. Patella (Fig. 124G-J): d2 trichobothrium distal to patellar process; five eb trichobothria arranged in two groups (eb1+eb4-5 and eb2-3); two esb, two em and one est trichobotria arranged in three (esb1, esb2+em1-2 and est) or four (esb1, esb2, em1-2 and est) groups; three et trichobothria; three v trichobothria. Chela manus (Fig. 124B-E): Dt situated in proximal half of manus; Eb3 close to Eb1-2; Esb closer to Est than to Eb group, sometimes aligned with Est; Est situated near midpoint; four V trichobothria, V3 distant from V4. Fixed chela finger with db situated on dorsal surface; esb slightly closer to eb than to est; eb situated at base of finger, proximal to point of articulation between fixed and movable fingers; two i trichobothria.

  • Coxosternum (Fig. 126A, C): Anterior margin of coxa III elongated distally, without anterodistal process. Sternum equilateral pentagonal (anterior width slightly greater than posterior width), as long as wide or nearly so.

  • Legs (Fig. 127): Femora I-IV with ventral surfaces bicarinate, pro- and retroventral carinae granular. Retrolateral margins of tibiae I-II without setiform macrosetae. Basitarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral rows each with 4/4, 4/5, 4/5 and 4/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively. Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral row each with 4/4, 4/4, 4-5/5 and 4-5/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively; retroventral row with one proximal spinule; ventromedian spinules absent. Ungues shorter than telotarsus, half its length or less.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 126A): Composed of two subtriangular sclerites.

  • Pectines (Fig. 126A-B): Moderately elongated, distal edge reaching but not extending beyond distal edge of coxa IV; fulcrae and three marginal lamellae present. Pectinal teeth count 7-8; teeth straight, entirely covered with sensory papillae.

  • Mesosoma(Figs122A-B,123A,E):Pre-tergitesI-VIIand posterior margins of pre-tergites smooth. Post-tergites: posterior margins of tergites I-VI sublinear, without distinct projection; lateral transversal sulcus present; intercarinal surfaces of I-VII densely covered with small spiniform granules, slightly less so medially on I-III; intercarinal surfaces of III-VII with distinct but faint reticulate network of ridges and dimples. Respiratory stigmata (spiracles) of sternites IV-VI short, their length less than third of sternite width, and distinctly crescent shaped. Sternite VII acarinate.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 128B-C): Not markedly compressed laterally; sparsely and minutely granular, posterior segments less so (segment V almost smooth); dorsal intercarinal surface of V smooth and shiny medially; distinct dorsomedian sulcus on segments I-IV, much less pronounced on segment V (usually only faintly expressed anteriorly).

  • Metasoma carinae: Segments I-IV: dorsolateral carinae obsolete on all segments; lateral median carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); lateral inframedian carinae discernible anteriorly as a faint ridge on segment I, absent on other segments; ventrolateral carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); paired ventrosubmedian carinae weakly developed (as low ridges). Segment V: dorsolateral and lateral median carinae obsolete; ventrolateral carinae only expressed as faint ridges; ventrosubmedian carinae fused, only expressed as a faint ridge in anterior two-thirds.

  • Metasoma spination: Segment I: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules. Segment II: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with 1-2 pairs of subposterior spiniform granules and 0-1 pair of median granules. Segments III-IV: dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carina without large spiniform granules. Segment V: ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae with scattered minute spiniform granules; anal arch crenulate.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: Segment I with eight macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and one pair (anterior) on lateral carinae, or ten macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae; segments II-IV each with ten macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae; segment V with 16 macrosetae, i.e. four pairs (anterior, median, subposterior and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and four pairs (anterior, supramedian, subposterior and posterior) on ventrolateral carinae.

  • Telson (Fig. 128B): Slightly longer than metasoma segment V; vesicle smooth, without granules; aculeus short (its length less than half of vesicle length), sharply curved.

  • Hemispermatophore (Fig. 129): Stalk distinctly longer than stem. Distal lamina curved, without distal crest on anterior margin; single laminar hook, median, situated between 3/7 and 1/2 from base of stalk (basal part/distal lamina ratio = 0.89-0.98, median = 0.97); transverse ridge distinct, more proximal than base of laminar hook, merging with anterior margin more proximally than base of laminar hook. Capsule: hemisolenos thin, folded on itself only proximally and above that unfolded to flattened distal tip (tip and base approximately of the same width), without lateral longitudinal carina, laterodistal accessory hook or medioposterior accessory apophysis; tip of hemisolenos more proximal than base of laminar hook, more distal than tip of clasper. Clasper well developed, forming distinct hump, not hook-like, without anterior accessory process. Subex well developed, spoon-shaped, merging anteriorly with base of clasper; posterior edge forming obtuse angle (>90°) with hemisolenos; anterior edge forming right angle (90°) with hemisolenos.

  • Description of adult female: Same characters as for male except as follows. Colouration (Fig. 122C-D): Legs slightly darker than in male, almost as dark as tergites.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 122C-D, 124A, F, K): Segments noticeably shorter or more robust than in male.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 125B): Dentate margins linear or nearly so, without pronounced lobe and notch, with two rows of primary denticles extending from tip to base of fingers and bearing large inner accessory denticles.

  • Legs: Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral rows each with 4/4, 4-5/4, 4-5/5 and 5/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 126D): Oval to semi-oval, as wide as long or nearly so (length/width ratio = 1.00-1.04, median = 1.01); opercular sclerites partly fused, with distinct median suture; posterior notch present, at least weakly developed.

  • Pectines (Fig. 126D-E): Short distal edge not reaching distal edge of coxa IV. Pectinal teeth count 7; teeth short and straight, sensory papillae covering only distal half.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 122C-D, 123B, F): Post-tergites: reticulate network of ridges and dimples on segments III-VII more distinct than in male; intercarinal surfaces of I-II medially smooth, laterally granular; anterior half of intercarinal surfaces of III-VI medially smooth, laterally granular, posterior half densely granular; anterior half of intercarinal surfaces of VII smooth, posterior half densely granular.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 128A): Spination: ventrosubmedian carinae of segment I with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules and 0-1 pair of median granules.

  • Intraspecific variation: Pedipalp trichobothria: On the retrolateral side of the pedipalp patella trichobothrium est is in some specimens close to em1-2, resulting in three groups (esb1, esb2+em1-2 and est) instead of three (esb1-2, em1-2 and est) or four (esb1, esb2, em1-2 and est). On the retrolateral side of the pedipalp chela Esb may be slightly more distal, aligning with Est.

  • Leg spination: The number of setiform macrosetae varies from four to five in the proventral row on telotarsi II-IV.

  • Female genital operculum: The length/width ratio varies from 1.00 to 1.04 (median = 1.01).

  • Pectines: The pectinal teeth count varies from seven to eight in males.

  • Metasoma: Spination: On the ventrosubmedian carinae of segment I 0-1 pair of median spiniform granules is present, and one more spiniform granule may be expressed in the subposterior group. One more spiniform granule may be expressed in the subposterior group of segment II, and one more or one fewer may be expressed in the median group.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: Eight to ten macroseta are expressed on segment I. Segment V may have 13 to 15 macrosetae instead of 16 (one to three macrosetae not expressed).

  • Hemispermatophores: The basal part/distal lamina ratio varies from 0.89 to 0.99 (median = 0.97).

  • Distribution and ecology: Hormurus menapi sp. nov. is only known from Menapi Village on the southern coast of the Cape Vogel Peninsula, north of Goodenough Bay in Milne Bay Province, eastern tip of New Guinea (Fig. 130, see also Fig. 101B). Hormurus menapi sp. nov. was collected together and is probably co-occurring with an undescribed Hormurus species (see further below).

  • Remarks: See remarks in the description of H. maiwa sp. nov. for details about the 1953 Archbold Expedition, and Fig. 101B for a historical map of the localities surveyed during this trip.

  • Table 13.

    Hormurus menapi sp. nov., measurements (in mm) and repository of adult males and females.

    img-z171-6_01.gif

    Fig. 122.

    Hormurus menapi sp. nov., habitus, dorsal (A, C) and ventral (B, D) aspect. (A-B) Male holotype (AMNH). (C-D) Female paratype (AMNH). Scale lines: 10 mm.

    img-z172-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 123.

    Hormurus menapi sp. nov., carapace and mesosomal tergites showing ornamentation and macrosculpture of cuticle (A-B), detailed views of carapace (C-D) and of tergite V (E-F), dorsal aspect. (A, C, E) Male holotype (AMNH). (B, D, F) Female paratype (AMNH). Scale lines: 3 mm (A-B), 2 mm (C-F).

    img-z174-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 124.

    Hormurus menapi sp. nov., pedipalp chela (A-E), patella (F-J), femur and trochanter (K-O), dorsal (A-B, F-G, K-L), retrolateral (C, H, M), ventral (D, I, N) and prolateral (E, J, O) aspect showing trichobothria pattern. (A, F, K) Female paratype (AMNH). (B-E, G-J, L-O) Male holotype (AMNH). Scale lines: 5 mm.

    img-z175-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 125.

    Hormurus menapi sp. nov., left pedipalp chelae, retrolateral aspect showing dentate margin of chela fingers (A-B), dorsal aspect showing dentate margin of movable finger (C), ventral aspect showing dentate margin of fixed finger (D). (A, C-D) Male holotype (AMNH). (B) Female paratype (AMNH). Scale lines:, 2 mm.

    img-z176-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 126.

    Hormurus menapi sp. nov., coxae II-IV, sternum, genital operculum and pectines, ventral aspect (A, D), left pecten under UV light (B, E), anterior margin of coxae III (C, F). (A-C) Male holotype (AMNH). (D-F) Female paratype (AMNH). Scale lines: 2 mm (A, C-D, F), 1 mm (B, E).

    img-z177-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 127.

    Hormurus menapi sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH), right tarsi, ventral (A-D) and retrolateral (E) aspect. (A) Tarsus I. (B) Tarsus II. (C) Tarsus III. (D-E) Tarsus IV. Scale line: 1 mm.

    img-z179-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 128.

    Hormurus menapi sp. nov., metasoma and telson, lateral (A-B) and ventral (C) aspects. (A) Female paratype (AMNH). (B-C) Male holotype (AMNH). Scale lines: 3 mm.

    img-z180-8_01.jpg

    Fig. 129.

    Hormurus menapi sp. nov., left hemispermatophore of male holotype (AMNH; A-D) and of male paratype (AMNH; E-H). (A, E) Lateral aspect. (B, F) Anterior aspects. (C, G) Rotated approximately 45° counter-clockwise from anterior aspect. (D, H) Contralateral aspect. Scale lines: 1 mm.

    img-z181-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 130.

    Known localities of Hormurus menapi sp. nov. on Cape Vogel Peninsula, north of Goodenough Bay in Milne Bay Province, at the eastern tip of New Guinea. The color gradient indicates topography and bathymetry.

    img-z182-1_01.jpg

    Hormurus tagula Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.
    Figs 131-138, Tab. 14

  • This species was treated under the manuscript name “Hormurus tagulae” in Monod (2011a: 293, 532, 537).

  • Material: AMNH [LP 3008]; ♂ holotype; Papua New Guinea, Milne Bay Province, Sudest Island, Araetha Village, at sea level, 11.44°S, 153.43°E; 11.IV.2004; leg. J.D. Slapcinsky (sample JS-0705). – AMNH [LP 3008]; 1 ♀, 6 imm. paratypes; same data as for holotype. – UMMZ [LP 3008]; 6 imm. paratypes; same data as for holotype.

  • Etymology: Tagula is the Papuan name of Sudest Island where the types specimens were collected. The epithet is an invariable name in apposition.

  • Diagnosis: H. tagula sp. nov. is morphologically close to H. sibonai sp. nov. The two species may be differentiated by two characters in male specimens: (1) the number of pectinal teeth is higher in H. tagula sp. nov. (9-11; Fig. 135) than in H. sibonai sp. nov. (8, Fig. 143A-B); (2) the anterodistal tips of coxae II-III are narrower and more elongated in H. tagula sp. nov. (Fig. 135) than in H. sibonai sp. nov. (Fig. 143A, C).

  • Description of adult male: Colouration (Fig. 131A-B): Dorsal surface of chelicera manus dark brown with black infuscation, more pronounced anteriorly; fingers black. Carapace reddish brown, median ocular region black. Tergites brown. Pedipalps reddish brown; carinae and fingers black. Legs paler than tergites, pale brown dorsally, orange to yellow ventrally, prolateral carina of femora black. Coxapophyses I-II light brown, anterior tips black; coxae I-IV orange to yellow; sternum light brown, posterolaterally orange; sternites III-VI brown, posterior half of V pale yellow; sternite VII dark brown, almost black; genital operculum and pectines yellow. Metasoma reddish brown with darker infuscation; telson paler than metasoma, vesicle yellow to orange, aculeus reddish brown.

  • Cuticle: Nongranular surfaces of carapace, pedipalps, legs, mesosoma and metasoma finely punctate.

  • Carapace (Fig. 132A, C): Anterior margin with median notch moderately excavated. Anterior furcated sutures distinct. Median ocular tubercle slightly raised; median ocelli present, at least twice the size of lateral ocelli, separated from each other by approximately the diameter of a median ocellus. Three pairs of lateral ocelli, equal in size, equidistant and adjacent to each other. Surfaces densely granular (with small to medium-sized granules), except for smooth anterior areas of frontal lobes and median ocular area.

  • Chelicerae: Basal and median teeth of fixed finger fused into bicusp. Dorsal margin of movable finger with four teeth (one basal, one median, one subdistal and one distal); dorsal distal tooth smaller than ventral distal tooth; ventral margin smooth.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 131A-B, 133B-E, G-J, L-O): Segments moderately elongated, femur longer than carapace. Chela almost asetose.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 134A, C-D): Fixed finger: basal lobe well developed and conical; suprabasal notch distinct and deep; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to median lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent on suprabasal notch; single row of denticles on basal lobe. Movable finger: basal lobe absent; suprabasal lobe well developed, conical, gently rounded dorsally and lacking sharp conical tooth, not overlapping with fixed finger; suprabasal lobe and corresponding notch on fixed finger contiguous, no proximal gap or at most reduced gap only evident when fingers closed; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to suprabasal lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent on suprabasal notch; few sparse denticles basally.

  • Pedipalp carinae: Femur (Fig. 133L-O): proventral carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized to large spiniform granules; promedian carinae absent; prodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized to large spiniform granules, more developed than proventral carina; retrodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, less strongly developed than prodorsal carina; retroventral carina visible as a ridge of medium to large spiniform granules, more developed than retrodorsal carina; ventromedian carina obsolete, only discernible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules. Patella (Fig. 133G-J): proventral carina discernible as costate-granular ridge proximally, obsolete distally; promedian and prodorsal carinae visible as ridges with medium-sized to large spiniform granules, equally developed, fused medially into prominent spiniform process with pointed medially located apex; dorsomedian carina only visible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retrodorsal carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; paired retromedian carinae fused and visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium-sized granules). Chela manus (Fig. 133B-E): proventral and promedian carinae visible as faint ridges with medium-sized spiniform granules, equally developed; prodorsal carina obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; dorsomedian carina visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, more strongly developed than prodorsal carina; dorsal secondary carina obsolete; digital carina visible as a ridge of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, less distinct in distal area, more developed than retromedian carina; fused retromedian carinae obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules proximally; retrolateral secondary carina vestigial, only discernible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules proximal to condyle of movable finger; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of large granules in proximal half and medium-sized ones in distal half); ventromedian carina obsolete, only proximally expressed as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules.

  • Pedipalp macrosculpture: Femur (Fig. 133L-O): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small spiniform granules; dorsal intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth proximally; ventral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Patella (Fig. 133G-J): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela manus (Fig. 133B-E): prolateral intercarinal surface covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth proximally; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela fingers densely covered with small spiniform granules in proximal half, smooth or nearly so in distal half, ventral surface smooth; trichobothria dst, dsb and db together in a single large smooth depression.

  • Trichobothria: Pedipalp orthobothriotaxic, accessory trichobothria absent. Patella (Fig. 133G-J): d2 trichobothrium distal to patellar process; five eb trichobothria arranged in two groups (eb1+eb4-5 and eb2-3); two esb, two em and one est trichobotria arranged in three (esb1-2, em1-2 and est) or four (esb1, esb2, em1-2 and est) groups; three et trichobothria; three v trichobothria. Chela manus (Fig. 133B-E): Dt situated in proximal half of manus; Eb3 close to Eb1-2; Esb closer to Est than to Eb group; Est situated near midpoint; four V trichobothria, V3 distant from V4. Fixed chela finger with db situated on dorsal surface; esb slightly closer to eb than to est; eb situated at base of finger, proximal to point of articulation between fixed and movable fingers; two i trichobothria.

  • Coxosternum (Fig. 135A, C): Anterior margin of coxa III markedly elongated distally, without anterodistal process. Sternum equilateral pentagonal (anterior width slightly greater than posterior width), almost as long as wide.

  • Legs (Fig. 136): Femora I-IV with ventral surfaces bicarinate, pro- and retroventral carinae granular. Retrolateral margins of tibiae I-II without setiform macrosetae. Basitarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral rows each with 4/4, 4/4, 4/5 and 4/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively. Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral row each with 4/4, 4-5/4-5, 4-5/5 and 5/4-5 setiform macrosetae, respectively; retroventral row with one proximal spinule; ventromedian spinules absent. Ungues shorter than telotarsus, half its length or less.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 135A): Composed of two subtriangular sclerites.

  • Pectines (Fig. 135A-B): Relatively short, distal edge not reaching distal edge of coxa IV; fulcrae and three marginal lamellae present. Pectinal teeth count 9-11; teeth straight, entirely covered with sensory papillae.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 131A-B, 132A, E): Pre-tergites I-VII and posterior margins of pre-tergites smooth. Post-tergites: posterior margins of tergites I-VI sublinear, without distinct projection; lateral transversal sulcus present; intercarinal surfaces of I-III densely covered with small spiniform granules, smooth anteromedially; intercarinal surfaces of IV-VII densely covered with small spiniform granules, less so anteromedially; intercarinal surfaces III-VII with distinct but faint reticulate network of ridges and dimples. Respiratory stigmata (spiracles) of sternites IV-VI short, their length less than third of sternite width, and distinctly crescent shaped. Sternite VII acarinate.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 137B-C): Not markedly compressed laterally; sparsely and minutely granular, posterior segments less so (segment V almost smooth); dorsal intercarinal surface of V smooth and shiny medially; distinct dorsomedian sulcus on segments I-IV, much less pronounced on segment V (usually only faintly expressed anteriorly).

  • Metasoma carinae: Segments I-IV: dorsolateral carinae obsolete on all segments; lateral median carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); lateral inframedian carinae discernible anteriorly as a faint ridge on segment I, absent on other segments; ventrolateral carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); paired ventrosubmedian carinae weakly developed (as low ridges). Segment V: dorsolateral and lateral median carinae obsolete; ventrolateral carinae only expressed as faint ridges; ventrosubmedian carinae fused, only expressed as a faint ridge in anterior two-thirds.

  • Metasoma spination: Segment I: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules. Segment II: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules and 0-1 pair of median granules. Segments III-IV: dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carina without large spiniform granules. Segment V: ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae without large spiniform granules; anal arch crenulate.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: Segment I with eight macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and one pair (anterior) on lateral carinae, or ten macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae; segments II-IV with ten macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae; segment V with 16 macrosetae, i.e. four pairs (anterior, median, subposterior and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and four pairs (anterior, supramedian, subposterior and posterior) on ventrolateral carinae.

  • Telson (Fig. 137B): Slightly longer than metasoma segment V; vesicle smooth, without granules; aculeus short (less than half of vesicle length), sharply curved. Hemispermatophore: Unknown. Given its state of preservation, the holotype, which is the only male known, is probably a freshly molted specimen. The paraxial organs were probably not functional yet and the hemispermatophores had not been secreted at the time of preservation.

  • Description of adult female: Same characters as for male except as follows. Colouration (Fig. 131C-D): Legs slightly darker than in male, almost as dark as tergites.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 131C-D, 133A, F, K): Segments slightly shorter and more robust than in males.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 134B): Dentate margins linear or nearly so, without pronounced lobe and notch, with two rows of primary denticles extending from tip to base of fingers and bearing large inner accessory denticles.

  • Legs: Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral rows each with 4/3-4, 4/4, 4-5/5 and 5/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 135D): Oval to semi-oval, longer than wide (length/width ratio = 1.15); opercular sclerites partly fused, with distinct median suture; posterior notch present, at least weakly developed.

  • Pectines (Fig. 135D-E): Short, distal edge not reaching distal edge of coxa IV. Pectinal teeth count 7-8; teeth short and straight, sensory papillae covering only distal half.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 131C-D, 132B, F): Post-tergites: reticulate network of ridges and dimples on segments III-VII more distinct than in male; intercarinal surfaces of I-II medially smooth, laterally granular; anterior half of intercarinal surfaces of III-VI medially smooth, laterally granular, posterior half densely granular; anterior half of intercarinal surfaces of VII smooth, posterior half densely granular.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 137A): Spination of segment I: ventrosubmedian carinae with 1-2 pairs of subposterior spiniform granules.

  • Intraspecific variation: Pedipalp trichobothria: On the retrolateral side of the pedipalp patella trichobothrium esb1 is in some specimens located midway between esb2 and em1-2 rather than close to esb2, resulting in four groups (esb1, esb2, em1-2 and est) instead of three (esb1-2, em1-2 and est). Esb on the retrolateral side of the pedipalp chela may be slightly more distal, aligning with Est.

  • Leg spination: The number of setiform macrosetae varies from three to four retroventrally on telotarsi I, from four to five proventrally on telotarsi II-III, and from four to five retroventrally on telotarsi II and IV.

  • Pectines: The pectinal teeth count varies from nine to 11 in males, and from seven to eight in females.

  • Metasoma: Spination: 1-2 pairs of subposterior spiniform granules are present on the ventrosubmedian carinae of segment I, and one extra spiniform granule in this group may be expressed in specimens with only one pair; 0-1 pair of median spiniform granules is present on the ventrosubmedian carinae of segment II, one fewer spiniform granule may be expressed in the median and subposterior groups, and one more may be expressed in the subposterior group.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: Eight to ten macroseta are expressed on segment I. One fewer macroseta may be expressed in the anterior group of segment IV, making it a total of nine instead of ten macrosetae, and in the subposterior group of segment V, making it a total of 15 instead of 16 macrosetae.

  • Distribution: Hormurus tagula sp. nov. is only known from Sudest Island (also known as Tagula or Vanatinai), the largest island of the Louisiades Archipelago, in Milne Bay Province, off the eastern tip of New Guinea (Fig. 138).

  • Table 14.

    Hormurus tagula sp. nov., measurements (in mm), repository and inventory number of adult male holotype and adult female paratype.

    img-z184-2_01.gif

    Fig. 131.

    Hormurus tagula sp. nov., habitus, dorsal (A, C) and ventral (B, D) aspect. (A-B) Male holotype (AMNH [LP3008]). (C-D) Female paratype (AMNH [LP3008]). Scale lines: 10 mm.

    img-z185-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 132.

    Hormurus tagula sp. nov., carapace and mesosomal tergites showing ornamentation and macrosculpture of cuticle (A-B), detailed views of carapace (C-D) and of tergite V (E-F), dorsal aspect. (A, C, E) Male holotype (AMNH [LP3008]). (B, D, F) Female paratype (AMNH [LP3008]). Scale lines: 5 mm (A-B), 2 mm (C-F).

    img-z186-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 133.

    Hormurus tagula sp. nov., pedipalp chela (A-E), patella (F-J), femur and trochanter (K-O), dorsal (A-B, F-G, K-L), retrolateral (C, H, M), ventral (D, I, N) and prolateral (E, J, O) aspect showing trichobothria pattern. (A, F, K) Female paratype (AMNH [LP3008]). (B-E, G-J, L-O) Male holotype (AMNH [LP3008]). Scale lines: 5 mm.

    img-z188-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 134.

    Hormurus tagula sp. nov., left pedipalp chelae, retrolateral aspect showing dentate margin of chela fingers (A-B), dorsal aspect showing dentate margin of movable finger (C), ventral aspect showing dentate margin of fixed finger (D). (A, C-D) Male holotype (AMNH [LP3008]). (B) Female paratype (AMNH [LP3008]). Scale lines: 2 mm.

    img-z189-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 135.

    Hormurus tagula sp. nov., coxae II-IV, sternum, genital operculum and pectines, ventral aspect (A, D), left pecten under UV light (B, E), anterior margin of coxae III (C, F). (A-C) Male holotype (AMNH [LP3008]). (D-F) Female paratype (AMNH [LP3008]). Scale lines: 2 mm (A, C-D, F), 1 mm (B, E).

    img-z190-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 136.

    Hormurus tagula sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP3008]), right tarsi, ventral (A-D) and retrolateral (E) aspect. (A) Tarsus I. (B) Tarsus II. (C) Tarsus III. (D-E) Tarsus IV. Scale line: 2 mm.

    img-z191-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 137.

    Hormurus tagula sp. nov., metasoma and telson, lateral (A-B) and ventral (C) aspects. (A) Female paratype (AMNH [LP3008]). (B-C) Male holotype (AMNH [LP3008]). The dotted circle in C indicates the additional macroseta expressed in some specimens. Scale lines: 3 mm.

    img-z192-5_01.jpg

    Fig. 138.

    Known locality of Hormurus tagula sp. nov. on Sudest Island in the Louisiades Archipelago, Milne Bay Province, off the eastern tip of New Guinea. The color gradient indicates topography and bathymetry.

    img-z193-15_01.jpg

    Hormurus sibonai Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.
    Figs 5D, 139-147, Tab. 15

  • Material: AMNH [LP 4744]; ♂ holotype; Papua New Guinea, Milne Bay Province, D'Entrecasteaux Islands, Normanby Island, Sewa Bay, 10.04°S, 150.98°E; 31.I.2003; leg. F. Kraus. (JS-0630).

  • Etymology: Sibonai is the predominant dialect spoken in the Sewa Bay area on Fergusson Island (Frawley, 2003; Glottolog website  https://glottolog.org/resource/languoid/id/sewa1251 (accessed 9.XII.2022) where the holotype was collected. The epithet is an invariable name in apposition.

  • Diagnosis: Among Papuan Hormurus H. sibonai sp. nov., H. hypseloscolus sp. nov., H. krausi sp. nov. and H. tagula sp. nov. form a distinct group characterized by a distal position of the hemispermatophore laminar hook (situated in the distal half of the stalk; basal part/distal lamina ratio > 1) and by the longer than wide female genital opercula (length/width ratio >1). Hormurus sibonai sp. nov. can be distinguished from the other species in this group by the following characters in adult males (the female of H. sibonai sp. nov. is unknown): (1) the pedipalps in H. sibonai sp. nov. (Fig. 139) are much less elongated than in H. hypseloscolus sp. nov. (Figs 158, 159A-B); (2) the suprabasal lobe of the pedipalp chela finger and the corresponding notch of the fixed finger are contiguous in H. sibonai sp. nov. (Fig. 142), whereas they are separated by a distinct gap in H. krausi sp. nov. (Fig. 152A); (3) the anterodistal tips of coxae III do not exhibit any process or morphological modification in H. sibonai sp. nov. (Fig. 143A, C), whereas they are more elongated and narrower in H. tagula sp. nov. (Fig. 135A, C) and H. hypseloscolus sp. nov. (Fig. 163A, C), and they have an unusual lanceolate shape in H. krausi sp. nov. (Fig. 153A, C); (4) the number of pectinal teeth in H. sibonai sp. nov. (8; Fig. 143A-B) is lower than in H. tagula sp. nov. (9-11; Fig. 135A-B); (5) H. sibonai sp. nov. possesses eight ventral macrosetae on metasoma segment I (Fig. 145B), i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on the ventrosubmedian carinae and one pair (anterior) on the lateral carinae, whereas the other three species possess ten, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on the ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on the ventrolateral carinae (Figs 137C, 155C, 165C); (6) the hemispermatophore lamellar hook is less distal in H. sibonai sp. nov. (basal part/distal lamina ratio = 1.2; Fig. 146) than in two of the other three species (basal part/distal lamina ratio = 1.43-1.8/1.84-1.93; Figs 156, 166, hemispermatophore unknown for H. tagula sp. nov.).

  • Description of adult male: Colouration (Fig. 139): Dorsal surface of chelicera manus dark brown with black infuscation, more pronounced anteriorly; fingers black. Carapace reddish brown, median ocular region black. Tergites brown. Pedipalps reddish brown; carinae and fingers black. Legs paler than tergites, dorsal surface brown with lighter spots (orange to yellow) more pronounced on tibiae and basitarsi, telotarsi yellow; ventral surface orange, distal segments (tibiae, basitarsi and telotarsi) slightly paler; prolateral carina of femora black. Coxapophyses I-II light brown, their anterior tip black; coxae I-IV light brown; sternum and sternites brown; genital operculum light brown, pectines light brown to yellow. Metasoma reddish brown with darker infuscation; telson paler than metasoma, vesicle yellow to orange, aculeus reddish brown.

  • Cuticle: Nongranular surfaces of carapace, pedipalps, legs, mesosoma and metasoma finely punctate.

  • Carapace (Fig. 140A-B): Anterior margin with median notch moderately excavated. Anterior furcated sutures distinct. Median ocular tubercle slightly raised; median ocelli present, at least twice the size of lateral ocelli, separated from each other by approximately the diameter of a median ocellus. Three pairs of lateral ocelli, equal in size, equidistant and adjacent to each other. Surfaces finely and densely granular, except for smooth anterior half of frontal lobes and median ocular area.

  • Chelicerae: Basal and median teeth of fixed finger fused into bicusp. Dorsal margin of movable finger with four teeth (one basal, one median, one subdistal and one distal); dorsal distal tooth smaller than ventral distal tooth; ventral margin smooth.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 139, 141): Segments moderately elongated, femur slightly longer than carapace. Chela almost asetose.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 142): Fixed finger: basal lobe well developed and conical; suprabasal notch distinct and deep; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to median lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent on suprabasal notch; single row of denticles on basal lobe. Movable finger: basal lobe absent; suprabasal lobe well developed, conical, gently rounded dorsally and lacking sharp conical tooth, not overlapping with fixed finger; suprabasal lobe and corresponding notch on fixed finger contiguous, no proximal gap or at most reduced gap only evident when fingers closed; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to suprabasal lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent on suprabasal notch; few scattered denticles basally.

  • Pedipalp carinae: Femur (Fig. 141I-L): proventral carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; promedian carinae absent; prodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized to large spiniform granules, more developed than proventral carina; retrodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, less strongly developed than prodorsal carina; retroventral carina visible as a ridge of medium to large spiniform granules, more developed than retrodorsal carina; ventromedian carina obsolete, only discernible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules. Patella (Fig. 141E-H): proventral carina discernible as costate-granular ridge proximally, obsolete distally; promedian and prodorsal carinae visible as ridges with medium-sized to large spiniform granules, equally developed, fused medially into prominent spiniform process with pointed medially located apex; dorsomedian carina only visible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retrodorsal carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; paired retromedian carinae fused and visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium-sized granules). Chela manus (Fig. 141A-D): proventral and promedian carinae visible as faint ridges with medium-sized spiniform granules, equally developed; prodorsal carina obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; dorsomedian carina visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, more strongly developed than prodorsal carina; dorsal secondary carina obsolete; digital carina visible as a ridge of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, less distinct in distal area, more developed than retromedian carina; fused retromedian carinae obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules proximally; retrolateral secondary carina vestigial, only discernible proximal to condyle of movable finger as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of large granules in proximal half, medium-sized in distal half); ventromedian carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules.

  • Pedipalp macrosculpture: Femur (Fig. 141I-L): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small spiniform granules; dorsal intercarinal surface densely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth proximally; ventral intercarinal surface densely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, distal third smooth. Patella (Fig. 141E-H): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela manus (Fig. 141A-D): prolateral intercarinal surface covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth proximally; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela fingers densely covered with small spiniform granules in proximal half, smooth or nearly so distally, ventral surface smooth; trichobothria dst, dsb and db together in a single large smooth depression.

  • Trichobothria: Pedipalp orthobothriotaxic, accessory trichobothria absent. Patella (Fig. 141E-H): d2 trichobothrium distal to patellar process; five eb trichobothria arranged in two groups (eb1+eb4-5 and eb2-3); two esb, two em and one est trichobotria arranged in three groups (esb1-2, em1-2 and est); three et trichobothria; three v trichobothria. Chela manus (Fig. 141A-D): Dt situated in proximal half of manus; Eb3 close to Eb1-2; Esb closer to Est than to Eb group, aligned with Est; Est situated near midpoint; four V trichobothria, V3 distant from V4. Fixed chela finger with db situated on dorsal surface; esb closer to eb than to est; eb situated at base of finger, proximal to point of articulation between fixed and movable fingers; two i trichobothria.

  • Coxosternum (Fig. 143A, C): Anterior margin of coxa III moderately elongated distally, without anterodistal process. Sternum equilateral pentagonal (anterior width slightly greater than posterior width), slightly wider than long.

  • Legs (Fig. 144): Femora I-IV with ventral surfaces bicarinate, pro- and retroventral carinae granular. Retrolateral margins of tibiae I-II without setiform macrosetae. Basitarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral rows each with 4/4, 4/5, 4/5 and 4/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively. Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral row each with 3-4/4, 4/4, 5/4 and 5/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively; retroventral row with one proximal spinule; ventromedian spinules absent. Ungues shorter than telotarsus, half its length or less.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 143A): Composed of two subtriangular sclerites.

  • Pectines (Fig. 143A-B): Moderately elongated, distal edge reaching but not extending beyond distal edge of coxa IV; fulcrae and three marginal lamellae present. Pectinal teeth count 8; teeth straight, entirely covered with sensory papillae.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 139, 140A, C-D): Pre-tergites I-VII and posterior margins of pre-tergites smooth. Post-tergites: posterior margins of tergites I-VI sublinear, without distinct projection; lateral transversal sulcus present; intercarinal surfaces of I densely covered with small spiniform granules, smooth anteromedially; intercarinal surfaces of II-V densely covered with small spiniform granules, less so anteromedially; intercarinal surfaces of VI-VII densely covered with small spiniform granules; intercarinal surfaces of III-VII with distinct but faint reticulate network of ridges and dimples. Respiratory stigmata (spiracles) of sternites IV-VI short, their length less than third of sternite width, and distinctly crescent shaped. Sternite VII acarinate.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 145): Not markedly compressed laterally; sparsely and minutely granular, posterior segments less so (segment V almost smooth); dorsal intercarinal surface of V smooth and shiny medially; distinct dorsomedian sulcus on segments I-IV, much less pronounced on segment V (usually only faintly expressed anteriorly).

  • Metasoma carinae: Segments I-IV: dorsolateral carinae obsolete on all segments; lateral median carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); lateral inframedian carinae discernible anteriorly as a faint ridge on segment I, absent on other segments; ventrolateral carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); paired ventrosubmedian carinae weakly developed (as low ridges). Segment V: dorsolateral and lateral median carinae obsolete; ventrolateral carinae only expressed as faint ridges; ventrosubmedian carinae fused, only expressed as a faint ridge in anterior two-thirds.

  • Metasoma spination: Segment I: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules. Segment II: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules and one pair of median granules. Segments III-IV: dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carina without large spiniform granules. Segment V: ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae without large spiniform granules; anal arch crenulate.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: Segment I with eight macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and one pair (anterior) on lateral carinae; segments II-IV each with ten macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae; segment V with 16 macrosetae, i.e. four pairs (anterior, median, subposterior and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and four pairs (anterior, supramedian, subposterior and posterior) on ventrolateral carinae.

  • Telson (Fig. 145A): Longer than metasoma segment V; vesicle smooth, without granules; aculeus short (less than half of vesicle length), sharply curved.

  • Hemispermatophore (Fig. 146): Stalk distinctly longer than stem. Distal lamina curved, without distal crest on anterior margin; single laminar hook, situated in distal half of stalk (basal part/distal lamina ratio = 1.2); transverse ridge distinct, significantly more proximal than base of laminar hook, merging with anterior margin significantly more proximally than base of laminar hook. Capsule: hemisolenos thin, folded on itself only proximally and above that unfolded to flattened distal tip (tip and base approximately of same width), without lateral longitudinal carina, laterodistal accessory hook or medioposterior accessory apophysis; tip of hemisolenos more proximal than base of laminar hook, more distal than tip of clasper. Clasper well developed, forming distinct hump, not hook-like, with small anterior accessory process. Subex well developed, spoon-shaped, merging anteriorly with base of clasper; posterior edge forming obtuse angle (>90°) with hemisolenos; anterior edge forming right angle (90°) with hemisolenos.

  • Intraspecific variation: Leg spination: The number of setiform macrosetae varies from three to four in the proventral row of telotarsi I.

  • Metasoma: Spination: An extra subposterior spiniform granule may be expressed in one of the ventrosubmedian carinae of segment I.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: One or two fewer macrosetae may be expressed on each of the segments II-IV, making it a total of eight or nine instead of the usual ten per segment; and one to three fewer macrosetae may be expressed on segment V, making it a total of 13, 14 or 15 instead of the usual 16.

  • Distribution: Hormurus sibonai sp. nov. is only known from Normanby Island (also known in the local languages as Kwaiatabu and Duau), the southernmost island of the D'Entrecasteaux Archipelago, in Milne Bay Province, off the northeastern tip of New Guinea (Fig. 147).

  • Table 15.

    Hormurus sibonai sp. nov., measurements (in mm) of the holotype adult male.

    img-z194-11_01.gif

    Fig. 139.

    Hormurus sibonai sp. nov., habitus of male holotype (AMNH [LP4744]), dorsal (A) and ventral (B) aspects. Scale line: 10 mm.

    img-z195-7_01.jpg

    Fig. 140.

    Hormurus sibonai sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP4744]), carapace and mesosomal tergites showing ornamentation and macrosculpture of cuticle (A), detailed view of carapace (B), of tergite V (C) and of tergite VII (D), dorsal aspect. Scale lines: 5 mm (A), 2 mm (B-D).

    img-z196-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 141.

    Hormurus sibonai sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP4744]), dorsal (A, E, I), retrolateral (B, F, J), ventral (C, G, K) and prolateral (D, H, L) aspects showing trichobothria pattern. (A-D) Pedipalp chela. (E-H) Patella. (I-L) Femur and trochanter. Scale line: 5 mm.

    img-z197-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 142.

    Hormurus sibonai sp. nov., male holoptype (AMNH [LP4744]), left pedipalp chela. (A) Retrolateral aspect showing dentate margin of chela fingers. (B) Dorsal aspect showing dentate margin of movable finger. (C) Ventral aspect showing dentate margin of fixed finger. Scale lines: 2 mm.

    img-z198-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 143.

    Hormurus sibonai sp. nov., male holoptype (AMNH [LP4744]), ventral aspect. (A) Coxae II-IV, sternum, genital operculum and pectines. (B) Left pecten under UV light. (C) Anterior margin of coxae III. Scale lines: 3 mm (A), 2 mm (C), 1 mm (B).

    img-AJbMW_01.jpg

    Fig. 144.

    Hormurus sibonai sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP4744]), right tarsi, ventral (A-D) and retrolateral (E) aspect. (A) Tarsus I. (B) Tarsus II. (C) Tarsus III. (D-E) Tarsus IV. Scale line: 2 mm.

    img-z200-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 145.

    Hormurus sibonai sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP4744]), metasoma and telson, lateral (A) and ventral (B) aspects. Scale lines: 3 mm.

    img-z201-3_01.jpg

    Fig. 146.

    Hormurus sibonai sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP4744]), left hemispermatophore. (A) Lateral aspect. (B) Anterior aspect. (C) Rotated approximately 45° counter-clockwise from anterior aspect. (D) Contralateral aspect. Small accessory process present on anterior side of claspers indicated by arrow. Scale line: 1 mm.

    img-z202-3_01.jpg

    Fig. 147.

    Type locality of Hormurus sibonai sp. nov. on Normanby Island in the D'Entrecasteaux Archipelago, Milne Bay Province, off the northeastern tip of New Guinea. The color gradient indicates topography and bathymetry.

    img-z203-5_01.jpg

    Hormurus krausi Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.
    Figs 113B, 148-157, Tab. 16

  • Hormurus papuanus Kraepelin, 1914 (in part; misidentification): 331, 333. – Monod, 2000 (in part; misidentification): 291, 536, 686-687, fig. 122.

  • Material: AMNH [LP 2715]; ♂ holotype; Papua New Guinea, Morobe Province, Mt Shungol, W of Apele, near junction of Kasang Creek and Ouz River, 860 m, broadleaf forest, arboreal, 1-3 m above ground on mossy tree trunks, 6.83°S, 146.70°E; 22.X.2003; leg. J.D. Slapcinsky & F. Kraus. – AMNH [LP 2715]; 1 ♂ paratype; same data as for holotype. – UMMZ [LP 2721]; 1 subadult ♂ paratype; same data as for holotype. – AMNH [LP 2724]; 1 ♀ paratype; Morobe Province, Mt Shungol, W of Apele, near junction of Kasang Creek and Ouz River, 750 m, broadleaf forest, arboreal, 1-3 m above ground on mossy tree trunks, 6.83°S, 146.70°E; 25.X.2003; leg. J.D. Slapcinsky. – AMNH [LP 2714]; 1 ♂ paratype; Morobe Province, Mt Shungol, site of Old Apele Village, 420 m, overgrown coconut and Pandanus garden, under coconut palm leaves, 6.79°S, 146.68°E; 24.X.2003; leg. J.D. Slapcinsky. – AMNH [LP 2725]; 1 ♀ paratype; Mt Shungol, W of Apele, Bwemamik, junction of Bwemamik Creek and Ouz River, 730 m, mature broadleaf forest, 6.81°S, 146.69°E; 17.X.2003; leg. J.D. Slapcinsky & F. Kraus. – UMMZ [LP 2726]; 1 subadult ♀, 1 juvenile paratypes; same data as for AMNH [LP 2725]. – UMMZ [LP 2727]; 1 juvenile ♀paratype; same data as for AMNH [LP 2725]. – ZMB 15165 Bis; 2 ♂, 3 ♀, 2 juvenile ♀ paratypes; D. N. Guinea, [Morobe Province], Huon Gulf, Bukaua (Kap Arkona) [6°43′33″S, 147°21′25″E]; [III.-VII.1909]; leg. R.G. Neuhauss. – CAS (without registration number); 3 ♂, 2 ♀, 1 subadult ♂ paratypes; Morobe Province, Finschhafen [6°33′29″S, 147°50′47″E]; IV.1944; leg. E.S. Ross. – CAS (without registration number); 1 ♂ paratype; Finschhafen; 7.IV.1944; leg. E.S. Ross. – CAS (without registration number); 1 ♀paratype; Finschhafen; 21.IV.1944; leg. E.S. Ross. – CAS (without registration number); 1 juvenile ♂paratype; Finschhafen; IV.1944; leg. E.S. Ross. – CAS (without registration number); 1 juvenile ♀ paratype; Finschhafen; 12.IV.1944; leg. E.S. Ross. – AMNH (without registration number); 1 juvenile ♀ paratype; Morobe Province, Lae [6°43′24″S, 146°59′46″E]; 1959; leg. J. Gunn. – AMNH (without registration number); 1 ♀, 1 juvenile ♀ paratypes; Morobe Province, Huon Peninsula, Lae (within city limits); 1.X.1964; leg. H.M. van Deusen. – AMNH (without registration number); 1 ♀, 1 juvenile ♀ paratypes; Lae, Botanical Garden; 18.VII.1964; leg. R. Zweifel & K. Sluder. – AMNH (without registration number); 1 subadult ♀ paratype; Morobe Province, 12 miles W of Lae, 600 ft; 18.VIII.1964; leg. R. Tweifel & K. Sluder. – ZMH (ZMH-A0015417); 2 ♂ paratypes; [Morobe Province] Neu Guinea [Papua New Guinea], Sattelberg [6°29′S, 147°46′E] b. Finsch Hafen; IX.1908-IV.1909; leg. G. Duncker, Hamburg Südsee-Expedition. – ZMB 7603; 1 ♂, 6 ♀, 1 subadult ♀ paratypes; Neu Guinea, [Madang Province], Astrolabe Bay? (see Remarks); leg. R. Rohde.

  • Etymology: The species is named after Fred Kraus, a herpetologist from Michigan University who has conducted extensive zoological surveys across Papua New Guinea. Although he focused on reptiles and amphibians, he also collected scorpions, including the types specimens of the present species.

  • Diagnosis: H. krausi sp. nov. can be easily distinguished from the other two species with a distal hemispermatophore lamellar hook, H. hypseloscolus sp. nov. and H. sibonai sp. nov., by the following characters in adult males: (1) on the pedipalp chelae of H. krausi sp. nov. there is a distinct proximal gap between the suprabasal lobe on the movable finger and the corresponding notch on the fixed finger (Fig. 152A), whereas in H. hypseloscolus sp. nov. (Fig. 162A) and H. sibonai sp. nov. (Fig. 142A) the lobe and notch are contiguous, without a proximal gap; (2) the basal lobe of the fixed chela finger is weakly developed in H. krausi sp. nov. (Fig. 152A), whereas in H. hypseloscolus n. sp (Fig. 162A) and H. sibonai n. sp (Fig. 142A) it is much larger; (3) the anterodistal tip of coxae III has a distinct lanceolate shape in the male of H. krausi sp. nov. (Fig. 153A, C), whereas in males of H. hypseloscolus sp. nov. (Fig. 163A, C) and H. sibonai sp. nov. (Fig. 143A, C) the anterodistal tip of coxae III does not exhibit any pronounced morphological modification or accessory process.

  • Description of adult male (holotype): Colouration (Figs 148, 149A-B): Dorsal surface of chelicera manus brown with black infuscation, more pronounced anteriorly; fingers black. Carapace reddish brown with infuscation, median ocular region black. Tergites brown with black infuscation. Pedipalps reddish brown; carinae and fingers black. Legs paler than tergites, brown to dark orange dorsally, orange to yellow ventrally, prolateral carina of femora black. Coxapophysis I brown, anterior tip pale yellow; coxapophysis II reddish brown to black; coxae I-II brown; sternum brown, lighter posterolaterally; sternites III-VI brown, posterior margin of V pale yellow; sternite VII dark brown to black posteriorly; genital operculum and pectines pale yellow. Metasoma reddish brown with darker infuscation; telson paler than metasoma, vesicle orange, aculeus reddish brown.

  • Cuticle: Nongranular surfaces of carapace, pedipalps, legs, mesosoma and metasoma finely punctate.

  • Carapace (Fig. 150A, C): Anterior margin with median notch moderately excavated. Anterior furcated sutures distinct; median ocular tubercle slightly raised; median ocelli present, at least twice the size of lateral ocelli, separated from each other by approximately the diameter of a median ocellus. Three pairs of lateral ocelli, equal in size, equidistant and adjacent to each other. Surfaces minutely and sparsely granular, except for smooth anterior areas of frontal lobes and median ocular area.

  • Chelicerae: Basal and median teeth of fixed finger fused into bicusp. Dorsal margin of movable finger with four teeth (one basal, one median, one subdistal and one distal); dorsal distal tooth smaller than ventral distal tooth; ventral margin smooth.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 148, 149A-B, 151B-E, G-J, L-O): Segments moderately elongated, femur slightly longer than carapace. Chela almost asetose.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 152A, C-D): Fixed finger: basal lobe weakly developed and conical; suprabasal notch distinct and deep; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to median lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent on suprabasal notch; few scattered denticles on basal lobe. Movable finger: basal lobe absent; suprabasal lobe well developed, conical, gently rounded dorsally and lacking sharp conical tooth, not overlapping with fixed finger; suprabasal lobe and corresponding notch on fixed finger with distinct proximal gap; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to suprabasal lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent basally.

  • Pedipalp carinae: Femur (Fig. 151L-O): proventral carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized to large spiniform granules; promedian carinae absent; prodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized to large spiniform granules, similarly developed as proventral carina; retrodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, less developed than prodorsal carina; retroventral carina visible as a ridge of medium to large spiniform granules, more developed than retrodorsal carina; ventromedian carina obsolete, only discernible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules. Patella (Fig. 151G-J): proventral carina discernible as a costate-granular ridge proximally, obsolete distally; promedian and prodorsal carinae visible as ridges with medium-sized to large spiniform granules, equally developed, fused medially into prominent spiniform process with pointed medially located apex; dorsomedian carina only visible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retrodorsal carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; paired retromedian carinae fused and visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium-sized granules). Chela manus (Fig. 151B-E): proventral and promedian carinae visible as faint ridges with medium-sized spiniform granules, equally developed; prodorsal carina obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; dorsomedian carina visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, more strongly developed than prodorsal carina; dorsal secondary carina obsolete; digital carina visible as a ridge of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, less distinct in distal area, more developed than retromedian carina; fused retromedian carinae obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules proximally; retrolateral secondary carina vestigial, only discernible proximal to condyle of movable finger as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium-sized granules); ventromedian carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules.

  • Pedipalp macrosculpture: Femur (Fig. 151L-O): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small spiniform granules; dorsal intercarinal surface densely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral dorsal intercarinal surface sparsely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules; retrolateral ventral intercarinal surface smooth or nearly so (very few scattered granules present); ventral intercarinal surface densely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, distal third smooth. Patella (Fig. 151G-J): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela manus (Fig. 151B-E): prolateral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth proximally; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela fingers densely covered with small spiniform granules in proximal half, smooth or nearly so distally, ventral surface smooth; trichobothria dst, dsb and db together in a single large smooth depression.

  • Trichobothria: Pedipalp orthobothriotaxic, accessory trichobothria absent. Patella (Fig. 151G-J): d2 trichobothria distal to patellar process; five eb trichobothria arranged in two groups (eb1+eb4-5 and eb2-3); two esb, two em and one est trichobotria arranged in three (esb1-2, em1-2 and est) or four (esb1, esb2, em1-2 and est) groups; three et trichobothria; three v trichobothria. Chela manus (Fig. 151B-E): Dt situated in proximal half of manus; Eb3 close to Eb1-2; Esb closer to Est than to Eb group, usually aligned with Est, sometimes more distal than Est; Est situated near midpoint; four V trichobothria, V3 distant from V4. Fixed chela finger with db situated on dorsal surface; esb distinctly closer to eb than to est; eb situated at base of finger, proximal to point of articulation between fixed and movable fingers; two i trichobothria. Coxosternum (Fig. 153A, C-D): Anterior margin of coxa III elongated distally, with a distinct lanceolate shape. Sternum equilateral pentagonal (anterior width slightly greater than posterior width), as long as wide or nearly so.

  • Legs (Fig. 154): Femora I-IV with ventral surfaces bicarinate, pro- and retroventral carinae granular. Retrolateral margins of tibiae I-II without setiform macrosetae. Basitarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral rows each with 4/4, 4/5, 4/5 and 4/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively. Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral row each with 3-4/4, 3-4/4, 4-5/4-5 and 4-5/4-5 setiform macrosetae, respectively; retroventral row with one proximal spinule; ventromedian spinules absent. Ungues shorter than telotarsus, half its length or less.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 153A): Composed of two subtriangular sclerites.

  • Pectines (Fig. 153A-B): Moderately elongated, distal edge reaching but not extending beyond distal edge of coxa IV; fulcrae and three marginal lamellae present. Pectinal teeth count 7-9; teeth straight, entirely covered with sensory papillae.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 149A-B, 150A, E): Pre-tergites I-VII and posterior margins of pre-tergites smooth. Post-tergites: posterior margins of tergites I-VI sublinear, without distinct projection; lateral transversal sulcus present; posterior half of intercarinal surfaces of I-VI densely covered with small spiniform granules, anterior half smooth medially, finely and densely granular laterally; intercarinal surfaces of VII densely covered with small spiniform granules; intercarinal surfaces of III-VII with distinct but faint reticulate network of ridges and dimples. Respiratory stigmata (spiracles) of sternites IV-VI long, their length at least one third of sternite width, and distinctly crescent shaped. Sternite VII acarinate.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 155B-C): Not markedly compressed laterally; sparsely and minutely granular, posterior segments less so (segment V almost smooth); dorsal intercarinal surface of V smooth and shiny medially; distinct dorsomedian sulcus on segments I-IV, much less pronounced on segment V (usually only faintly expressed anteriorly).

  • Metasoma carinae: Segments I-IV: dorsolateral carinae obsolete on all segments; lateral median carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); lateral inframedian carinae discernible as a faint ridge anteriorly on segment I, absent on other segments; ventrolateral carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); paired ventrosubmedian carinae weakly developed (as low ridges). Segment V: dorsolateral and lateral median carinae obsolete; ventrolateral carinae only expressed as faint ridges; ventrosubmedian carinae fused, only expressed as a faint ridge in anterior two-thirds.

  • Metasoma spination: Segment I: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules. Segment II: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules and 0-1 pair of median granules. Segments III-IV: dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carina without large spiniform granules. Segment V: ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae usually without granules, rarely with few scattered minute spiniform granules or spines; anal arch crenulate. Ventral metasoma setation: Segments I-IV each with ten macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae; segment V with 16 macrosetae, i.e. four pairs (anterior, median, subposterior and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and four pairs (anterior, supramedian, subposterior and posterior) on ventrolateral carinae.

  • Telson (Fig. 155B): Slightly longer than metasoma segment V; vesicle smooth, without granules; aculeus short (less than half of vesicle length), sharply curved.

  • Hemispermatophore (Fig. 156): Stalk slightly longer than stem. Distal lamina curved, without distal crest on anterior margin; single laminar hook, situated in distal half of stalk (basal part/distal lamina ratio = 1.43-1.80, median = 1.62); transverse ridge distinct, significantly more proximal than base of laminar hook and merging with anterior margin significantly more proximally than base of laminar hook. Capsule: hemisolenos thin, folded on itself only proximally and above that unfolded to flattened distal tip (tip and base approximately of same width), without lateral longitudinal carina, laterodistal accessory hook or medioposterior accessory apophysis; tip of hemisolenos more proximal than base of laminar hook, more distal than tip of clasper. Clasper well developed, forming distinct hump, not hook-like, with small to medium-sized anterior accessory process. Subex well developed, spoon-shaped, merging anteriorly with base of clasper; posterior edge forming obtuse angle (>90°) with hemisolenos; anterior edge forming right angle (90°) with hemisolenos.

  • Description of adult female: Same characters as for male except as follows.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 149C-D, 151A, F, K): Segments not noticeably shorter or more robust than in males.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 152B): Dentate margins linear or nearly so, without pronounced lobe and notch, with two rows of primary denticles extending from tip to base of fingers and bearing large inner accessory denticles.

  • Carapace (Fig. 150B, D): Frontal lobes and posteromedian margin smooth.

  • Coxosternum (Fig. 153E, G-H): Anterodistal margin of coxa III without morphological modification or accessory process.

  • Leg spination: Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral row each with 3-4/3-4, 3-4/4, 4-5/4-5 and 4-5/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 153E): Oval to semi-oval, longer than wide (length/width ratio = 1.12-1.25, median = 1.2); opercular sclerites partly fused, with distinct median suture; posterior notch present, at least weakly developed.

  • Pectines (Fig. 153E-F): Short, distal edge not reaching distal edge of coxa IV. Pectinal teeth count 6-8; teeth short and straight, sensory papillae covering only distal half.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 149C-D, 150B, F): Post-tergites: reticulate network of ridges and dimples on segments III-VII more distinct than in male; intercarinal surfaces of I-III medially smooth, laterally granular; intercarinal surfaces of IV-VI smooth or nearly so, lateral areas very faintly granular; anterior half of intercarinal surfaces of VII smooth, posterior half granular.

  • Intraspecific variation: Pedipalp trichobothria: On the retrolateral side of the patella trichobothria esb, em and est may be arranged in three (esb1-2, em1-2 and est) or four (esb1, esb2, em1-2 and est) groups. On the retrolateral side of the pedipalp chela Esb may be slightly more proximal, not aligning with Est.

  • Leg spination: The number of setiform macrosetae varies from three to four proventrally on telotarsi I-II, from three to four retroventrally on telotarsi I, and from four to five proventrally and retroventrally on telotarsi III-IV. Female genital operculum: The length/width ratio varies from 1.12 to 1.25 (median = 1.2).

  • Pectines: The pectinal teeth count varies from seven to nine in males and from six to eight in females.

  • Metasoma: Spination: One extra subposterior spiniform granule may be expressed on one of the ventrosubmedian carinae of segments I-II. On segment II the ventrosubmedian carinae have 0-1 pair of median granules, and one fewer median spiniform granule may be expressed on one of them.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: Segment IV may have nine macrosetae instead of the usual ten (one macroseta not expressed).

  • Hemispermatophores: The basal part/distal lamina ratio varies from 1.43 to 1.8 (median = 1.62).

  • Distribution and ecology: Hormurus krausi sp. nov. has only been reported from Morobe Province, on the southern coasts of the Huon Peninsula and in the Herzog Mountains south-east of Lae (Fig. 157). The record from Astrolabe Bay is considered doubtful (see description of H. sporacanthophorus sp. nov. for details). This species appears to be facultatively arboreal: it has been collected in broadleaf forests on mossy tree trunks, 1-3 m above the ground, but also in overgrown coconut and Pandanus gardens, under coconut palm leaves. It is probably syntopic with Liocheles australasiae (Fabricius, 1775) in Finschhafen and Lae, and with H. sporacanthophorus sp. nov. in Bukaua and Lae, because it was collected together with these two species at the localities mentioned.

  • Remarks: Edward Sherman Ross was an entomologist who worked as a curator at the Californian Academy of Sciences. During World War II he was sent to the battlefront in New Guinea and the Philippines, where he served as the commanding officer of an army malaria survey unit (Ross, 2009). When off-duty, he spent time collecting insects and other arthropods, among which are several specimens of the present species now deposited in the CAS collections.

  • All the specimens from the American Museum of Natural History listed in the material examined were collected during the last two Archbold expeditions to New Guinea:

  • (1) John Gunn was part of the collecting team in Lae during the sixth Archbold Expedition (Brass, 1964). He was probably a local guide.

  • (2) Hobart M. van Deusen was an employee of the American Museum of Natural History from 1945 to 1975, retiring as curator of the Mammalogy Department. He participated in three Archbold Expeditions to New Guinea, as mammalogist in 1953 and 1959, and as leader in 1964 (Horner & Van Gelder, 1979). He collected one female specimen of H. sporacanthophorus sp. nov. from Lae during the seventh and last of these expeditions in 1964.

  • (3) Richard G. Zweifel was a Curator of Herpetology at the AMNH from 1954 to 1989. He and his assistant Kip Sluder were guests of the seventh Archbold Expedition and collected mostly herpetological specimens (Van Deusen, 1964).

  • (Paul) Georg (Egmont) Duncker, an ichthyologist employed by the Hamburg Zoological Museum, collected two of the specimens listed above during the Hamburg Südsee-Expedition (1908-1910) to the Bismarck Archipelago (Thilenius, 1927). These specimens were originally part of the type series of H. papuanus Kraepelin, 1914.

  • Information on R. G. Neuhauss is provided in the description of H. sporacanthophorus sp. nov.

  • Table 16.

    Hormurus krausi sp. nov., measurements (in mm), repositories and inventory numbers of adult males.

    img-z205-2_01.gif

    (continued).

    img-z206-2_01.gif

    (continued).

    img-z207-2_01.gif

    (continued).

    img-z208-2_01.gif

    Fig. 148.

    Hormurus krausi sp. nov., habitus of male, dorsal aspect, reconstruction based on photographs. Scale line: 10 mm.

    img-z210-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 149.

    Hormurus krausi sp. nov., habitus, dorsal (A, C) and ventral (B, D) aspect. (A-B) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2715]). (C-D) Female paratype (ZMB 15165 Bis, Bukaua). Scale lines: 10 mm.

    img-z211-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 150.

    Hormurus krausi sp. nov., carapace and mesosomal tergites showing ornamentation and macrosculpture of cuticle (A-B), detailed views of carapace (C-D) and of tergite V (E-F), dorsal aspect. (A, C, E) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2715]). (B, D, F) Female paratype (ZMB 15165 Bis, Bukaua). Scale lines: 5 mm (A-B), 2 mm (C-F).

    img-z212-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 151.

    Hormurus krausi sp. nov., pedipalp chela (A-E), patella (F-J), femur and trochanter (K-O), dorsal (A-B, F-G, K-L), retrolateral (C, H, M), ventral (D, I, N) and prolateral (E, J, O) aspects showing trichobothria pattern. (A, F, K) Female paratype (ZMB 7603, Astrolabe Bay). (B-E, G-J, L-O) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2715]). Scale lines: 5 mm.

    img-z214-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 152.

    Hormurus krausi sp. nov., left pedipalp chelae, retrolateral aspect showing dentate margin of chela fingers (A-B), dorsal aspect showing dentate margin of movable finger (C), ventral aspect showing dentate margin of fixed finger (D). (A, C-D) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2715]). (B) Female paratype (ZMB 15165 Bis, Bukaua). Scale lines: 2 mm.

    img-z215-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 153.

    Hormurus krausi sp. nov., coxae II-IV, sternum, genital operculum and pectines, ventral aspect (A, E), left pecten under UV light (B, F), anterior margin of coxae III (C-D, G-H). (A-C) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2715]). (D) Juvenile male paratype (AMNH [LP2721]). (E-G) Female paratype (ZMB 7603, Astrolabe Bay). (H) Juvenile female paratype (ZMB 7603, Astrolabe Bay). Scale lines: 3 mm (A, E), 2 mm (C-D, G-H), 1 mm (B, F).

    img-z216-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 154.

    Hormurus krausi sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP2715]), right tarsi, ventral (A-D) and retrolateral (E) aspect. (A) Tarsus I. (B) Tarsus II. (C) Tarsus III. (D-E) Tarsus IV. Scale line: 2 mm.

    img-z217-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 155.

    Hormurus krausi sp. nov., metasoma and telson, lateral (A-B) and ventral (C) aspects. (A) Female paratype (ZMB 7603, Astrolabe Bay). (B-C) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2715]). Scale lines: 3 mm.

    img-z218-9_01.jpg

    Fig. 156.

    Hormurus krausi sp. nov., left hemispermatophore of male paratype (ZMH, Finschhafen; A-D), of male holotype (AMNH [LP2715]; E), of male paratype (CAS, Finschhafen; F), of male paratype (CAS, Finschhafen; G) and of male paratype (ZMB 7603, Astrolabe Bay; H). (A, E-H) Lateral aspect. (B) Anterior aspect. (C) Rotated approximately 45° counter-clockwise from anterior aspect. (D) Contralateral aspect. Scale lines: 1 mm.

    img-z219-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 157.

    Known localities of Hormurus krausi sp. nov. near the southern coasts of Huon Peninsula and in the Herzog Mountains, Morobe Province, Papua New Guinea. The color gradient indicates topography and bathymetry.

    img-z220-9_01.jpg

    Hormurus hypseloscolus Monod & Prendini, sp. nov.
    Figs 158-167, Tab. 17

  • This species was treated under the manuscript name “Hormurus hypselankylis” in Monod (2011a: 286, 532, 541).

  • Material: AMNH[LP 2717]; ♂ holotype; Papua New Guinea, Milne Bay Province, D'Entrecasteaux Islands, Fergusson Island, Basima, 250 m, 9.45°S, 150.8°E; 31.VIII.2002; leg. F. Kraus (sample JS-0640). – AMNH [LP 2717]; 3 ♀ paratypes; same data as for holotype. – UMMZ [LP 2717]; 1 ♀ paratype; same data as for holotype. – AMNH (without registration number); 1 ♀ paratype; Fergusson Island, mountains between Agamoia and Ailuluai, 900 m (Fig. 101B) [9°35′12″S, 150°37′50″E]; 5.-17.VI.1956; leg. L.J. Brass, Archbold Expedition.

  • Etymology: The name hypseloscolus is derived from the ancient Greek words “ὑψηλóς” [high] and “σκῶλoς” [pointed stake, thorn]. The epithet is an invariable noun in apposition and refers to the position of the hemispermatophore laminar hook, which is the most distal among the currently recognized species of Hormurus.

  • Diagnosis: Hormurus hypseloscolus sp. nov. differs from all other Papuan congeners in the very distal position of the hemispermatophore lamellar hook (Fig. 166). The basal part/distal lamina ratio varies from 1.84 to 1.93 (median = 1.88) in H. hypseloscolus sp. nov., whereas this ratio never exceeds 1.8 in the other species from Papua New Guinea. Moreover, the anterodistal margin of coxa III of males is narrower and more elongated in H. hypseloscolus sp. nov. (Fig. 163A, C) than in the other species. Small spiniform granules are present on the ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carinae of segment V in H. hypseloscolus sp. nov., whereas these granules are usually absent in the other species.

  • Description of adult male: Colouration (Figs 158, 159A-B): Dorsal surface of chelicera manus brown with black infuscation, more pronounced anteriorly; fingers black. Carapace reddish brown with infuscation, median ocular region black. Tergites brown with black infuscation. Pedipalps reddish brown; carinae and fingers black. Legs paler than tergites, orange with brown infuscation dorsally, orange to yellow ventrally, prolateral carina of femora black. Coxapophysis I brown, anterior tip pale yellow; coxapophysis II reddish brown to black; leg coxae orange-brown; sternum brown, lighter posterolaterally; sternites III-VI brown, posterior margin of V pale yellow; sternite VII dark brown to black posteriorly; genital operculum and pectines pale yellow. Metasoma reddish brown with darker infuscation; telson paler than metasoma, vesicle orange, aculeus reddish brown to black.

  • Cuticle: Nongranular surfaces of carapace, pedipalps, legs, mesosoma and metasoma finely punctate.

  • Carapace (Fig. 160A, C): Anterior margin with median notch moderately excavated. Anterior furcated sutures distinct; median ocular tubercle slightly raised; median ocelli present, at least twice the size of lateral ocelli, separated from each other by approximately the diameter of a median ocellus. Three pairs of lateral ocelli, equal in size, equidistant and adjacent to each other. Surfaces minutely and sparsely granular, except for smooth frontal lobes (median longitudinal sulci and anterior furcated sulci granular) and median ocular area.

  • Chelicerae: Basal and median teeth of fixed finger fused into bicusp. Dorsal margin of movable finger with four teeth (one basal, one median, one subdistal and one distal); dorsal distal tooth smaller than ventral distal tooth; ventral margin smooth.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 158, 159A-B, 161B-E, G-J, L-O): Segments long and slender, femur longer than carapace. Chela almost asetose.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 162A, C-D): Fixed finger: basal lobe well developed and conical; suprabasal notch distinct and deep; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to median lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent on suprabasal notch; single line of denticles on basal lobe. Movable finger: basal lobe absent; suprabasal lobe well developed, conical, gently rounded dorsally and lacking sharp conical tooth, not overlapping with fixed finger; suprabasal lobe and corresponding notch on fixed finger contiguous, no proximal gap or at most reduced gap only evident when fingers closed; dentate margins distally (from tip of finger to suprabasal lobe) with two rows of primary denticles bearing large inner accessory denticles; denticles absent basally.

  • Pedipalp carinae: Femur (Fig. 161L-O): proventral carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; promedian carinae absent; prodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, similarly developed as proventral carina; retrodorsal carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, similarly developed as prodorsal carina; retroventral carina visible as a ridge of medium to large spiniform granules, more developed than retrodorsal carina, more distinct in proximal two-thirds of segment; retroventral carina visible as a ridge of medium to large spiniform granules, more developed than retrodorsal carina; ventromedian carina obsolete, only discernible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules. Patella (Fig. 161G-J): proventral carina discernible proximally as costate ridge, obsolete distally; promedian and prodorsal carinae visible as ridges with medium-sized spiniform granules, equally developed, fused medially into prominent spiniform process with pointed medially located apex; dorsomedian carina only visible proximally as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retrodorsal carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; paired retromedian carinae fused and visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium-sized granules). Chela manus (Fig. 161B-E): proventral carina visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; promedian carina visible as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, more developed than promedian carina; prodorsal carina obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; dorsomedian carina visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules, more strongly developed than prodorsal carina; dorsal secondary carina obsolete; digital carina visible as a ridge of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, less distinct in distal area, more developed than retromedian carina; fused retromedian carinae obsolete, visible as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules proximally; retrolateral secondary carina vestigial, only distinct proximal to condyle of movable finger as a ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules; retroventral carina crenulate (composed of medium-sized granules); ventromedian carina obsolete, only expressed proximally as a faint ridge of medium-sized spiniform granules.

  • Pedipalp macrosculpture: Femur (Fig. 161L-O): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with small spiniform granules; dorsal intercarinal surface densely covered with small to medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; retrolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface densely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, distal third smooth. Patella (Fig. 161G-J): prolateral intercarinal surface sparsely covered with medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela manus (Fig. 161B-E): prolateral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of small to medium-sized spiniform granules, smooth proximally; dorsal and retrolateral intercarinal surfaces covered with dense reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules; ventral intercarinal surface covered with sparse reticulate network of medium-sized spiniform granules, distal area smooth. Chela fingers densely covered with small spiniform granules in proximal half, smooth or nearly so distally, ventral surface smooth; trichobothria dst, dsb and db each in a small smooth depression.

  • Trichobothria: Pedipalp orthobothriotaxic, accessory trichobothria absent. Patella (Fig. 161G-J): d2 trichobothrium distal to patellar process; five eb trichobothria arranged in two groups (eb1+eb4-5 and eb2-3); two esb, two em and one est trichobotria arranged in three groups (esb1-2, em1-2 and est); three v trichobothria. Chela manus (Fig. 161B-E): Dt situated in proximal third of manus; Eb3 close to Eb1-2; Esb closer to Est than to Eb group, usually aligned with Est; Est situated near midpoint; four V trichobothria, V3 distant from V4. Fixed chela finger with db situated on dorsal surface; esb distinctly closer to eb than to est; eb situated at base of finger, proximal to point of articulation between fixed and movable fingers; two i trichobothria.

  • Coxosternum (Fig. 163A, C): Anterior margin of coxa III narrow and markedly elongated distally, without anterodistal process. Sternum equilateral pentagonal (anterior width slightly greater than posterior width), as long as wide or nearly so.

  • Legs (Fig. 164): Femora I-IV with ventral surfaces bicarinate, pro- and retroventral carinae granular. Retrolateral margins of tibiae I-II without setiform macrosetae. Basitarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral rows each with 4/4, 4/5, 4/5 and 4/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively. Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral row each with 4/4, 4/4, 5/5 and 5/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively; retroventral row with one proximal spinule; ventromedian spinules absent. Ungues shorter than telotarsus, half its length or less.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 163A): Composed of two subtriangular sclerites.

  • Pectines (Fig. 163A-B): Moderately elongated, distal edge reaching but not extending beyond distal edge of coxa IV; fulcrae and three marginal lamellae present. Pectinal teeth count 9; teeth straight, entirely covered with sensory papillae.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 159A-B, 160A, E): Pre-tergites I-VII and posterior margins of pre-tergites smooth. Post-tergites: posterior margins of tergites I-VI sublinear, without distinct projection; lateral transversal sulcus present; intercarinal surfaces of I-II smooth medially, finely granular laterally; anterior half of intercarinal surfaces of III-VI smooth medially and finely granular laterally, posterior half finely granular; intercarinal surfaces of VII finely granular except along anteromedian margin; intercarinal surfaces of III-VII with distinct reticulate network of ridges and dimples. Respiratory stigmata (spiracles) of sternites IV-VI short, their length less than third of sternite width, and distinctly crescent shaped. Sternite VII acarinate.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 165B-C): Not markedly compressed laterally; sparsely and minutely granular, posterior segments less so; dorsal intercarinal surface of V smooth and shiny medially; distinct dorsomedian sulcus on segments I-IV, much less pronounced on segment V (usually only faintly expressed anteriorly).

  • Metasoma carinae: Segments I-IV: dorsolateral carinae obsolete on all segments; lateral median carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); lateral inframedian carinae distinct anteriorly, developed as a faint ridge on segment I, absent on other segments; ventrolateral carinae weakly developed (as faint ridges); paired ventrosubmedian carinae weakly developed (as low ridges). Segment V: dorsolateral and lateral median carinae obsolete; ventrolateral carinae only expressed as faint ridges; ventrosubmedian carinae fused, only expressed as a faint ridge in anterior two-thirds.

  • Metasoma spination: Segment I: dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules and one pair of median granules. Segment II: Dorsomedian posterior and dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral carinae without large spiniform granules; ventrosubmedian carinae with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules and two pairs of median spiniform granules. Segments III-IV: dorsolateral posterior spiniform granules absent; ventrolateral and ventrosubmedian carinae without large spiniform granules. Segment V: ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae with few scattered small spiniform granules; anal arch crenulate.

  • Ventral metasoma setation: Segments I-IV each with ten macrosetae, i.e. three pairs (anterior, median and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and two pairs (anterior and supramedian) on ventrolateral carinae; segment V with 16 macrosetae, i.e. four pairs (anterior, median, subposterior and posterior) on ventrosubmedian carinae and four pairs (anterior, supramedian, subposterior and posterior) on ventrolateral carinae.

  • Telson (Fig. 165B): Slightly longer than metasoma segment V; vesicle smooth, without granules; aculeus short (less than half of vesicle length), sharply curved.

  • Hemispermatophore (Fig. 166): Stalk distinctly longer than stem. Distal lamina at least slightly curved, without distal crest on anterior margin; single laminar hook, situated in distal half of stalk (basal part/distal lamina ratio = 1.84-1.93, median = 1.88); transverse ridge distinct, significantly more proximal than base of laminar hook and merging with anterior margin significantly more proximally than base of laminar hook. Capsule: hemisolenos thin, folded on itself only proximally, above that unfolded to flattened distal tip (tip and base approximately of same width), without lateral longitudinal carina, laterodistal accessory hook or medioposterior accessory apophysis; tip of hemisolenos more proximal than base of laminar hook, more distal than tip of clasper. Clasper well developed, forming distinct hump, not hook-like, without anterior accessory process. Subex well developed, spoon-shaped, merging anteriorly with base of clasper; posterior edge forming obtuse angle (>90°) with hemisolenos; anterior edge forming right angle (90°) with hemisolenos.

  • Description of adult female: Same characters as for male except as follows. Colouration (Fig. 159C-D): Legs darker than in male, almost as dark as tergites.

  • Carapace (Fig. 160C-D): Slightly more sparsely granuler than in male, posteromedian margin smooth.

  • Pedipalps (Figs 159C-D, 161A, F, K): All segments noticeable shorter and more robust than in males.

  • Chela fingers (Fig. 162B): Dentate margins linear or nearly so, without pronounced lobe and notch, with two rows of primary denticles extending from tip to base of fingers and bearing large inner accessory denticles.

  • Trichobothria: Patella: two esb, two em and one est trichobotria arranged in three (esb1-2, em1-2 and est) or four (esb1, esb2, em1-2 and est; esb1 distant from esb2) groups.

  • Coxosternum (Fig. 163D, F): Anterior margin of coxa III distally not as elongated and broader than in males. Leg spination: Telotarsi I-IV: pro- and retroventral rows each with 3-4/4, 3-4/4, 5/4-5 and 5/5 setiform macrosetae, respectively.

  • Genital operculum (Fig. 163D): Oval to semi-oval, longer than wide (length/width ratio = 1.03-1.28, median = 1.21); opercular sclerites partly fused, with distinct median suture; posterior notch present, at least weakly developed.

  • Pectines (Fig. 163D-E): Short, distal edge not reaching distal edge of coxa IV. Pectinal teeth count 6-9; teeth short and straight, sensory papillae covering only distal half.

  • Mesosoma (Figs 159C-D, 160B, F): Post-tergites: reticulate network of ridges and dimples on segments III-VII more distinct than in male; intercarinal surfaces of I-III medially smooth, laterally granular; intercarinal surfaces of III-VI smooth, lateral margins faintly granular; anterior third of intercarinal surfaces of VII smooth, posterior two-thirds finely granular.

  • Metasoma (Fig. 165A): Spination: ventrosubmedian carinae of segment II with one pair of subposterior spiniform granules and 1-2 pairs of median spiniform granules.

  • Intraspecific variation: Pedipalp trichobothria: On the retrolateral side of the patella trichobothria esb, em and est may be arranged in three (esb1-2, em1-2 and est) or four (esb1, esb2, em1-2 and est) groups. On the retrolateral side of the pedipalp chela Esb may be situated slightly more proximal, not aligning with Est.

  • Leg spination: The number of setiform macrosetae varies from three to four proventrally on telotarsi I-II, and four to five retroventrally on telotarsi III.

  • Female genital operculum: The length/width ratio varies from 1.03 to 1.28 (median = 1.21).

  • Pectines: The pectinal teeth count varies from six to nine in females.

  • Metasoma: Spination: One more subposterior spiniform granule and one less median granule may be expressed on one of the ventrosubmedian carinae of segment I. On segment II the ventrosubmedian carinae have one or two pairs of median spiniform granules, and one extra subposterior granule may be expressed on one of them.

  • Hemispermatophores: The basal part/distal lamina ratio varies from 1.84 to 1.93 (median = 1.88).

  • Distribution and ecology: Hormurus hypseloscolus sp. nov. is only known from Fergusson Island in the D'Entrecasteaux Archipelago, off the northeastern tip of New Guinea, and it is probably endemic to the island (Fig. 167). The species only appears to inhabit the lowlands (below 900 m), contrary to the other two species recorded from the same island, i.e. H. oyatabu sp. nov. and H. oyawaka sp. nov., which are probably restricted to the highlands above 1000 m.

  • Remarks: Leonard John Brass was an Australian botanist and explorer (Van Deusen, 1971; Perry, 1971; Forster, 1997). He was an Associate Curator for the AMNH from 1933 to 1966, and participated in six Archbold Expeditions to New Guinea, being leader of the last three. A female specimen of the present species was collected during the fifth Archbold Expedition (Brass, 1959).

  • Table 17.

    Hormurus hypseloscolus sp. nov., measurements (in mm), repository and inventory number of adult male holotype and adult females.

    img-z222-2_01.gif

    Fig. 158.

    Hormurus hypseloscolus sp. nov., habitus of male, dorsal aspect, reconstruction based on photographs. Scale line: 10 mm.

    img-z223-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 159.

    Hormurus hypseloscolus sp. nov., habitus, dorsal (A, C) and ventral (B, D) aspects. (A-B) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2717]). (C-D) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2717]). Scale lines: 10 mm.

    img-z224-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 160.

    Hormurus hypseloscolus sp. nov., carapace and mesosomal tergites showing ornamentation and macrosculpture of cuticle (A-B), detailed views of carapace (C-D) and of tergite V (E-F), dorsal aspect. (A, C, E) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2717]). (B, D, F) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2717]). Scale lines: 5 mm (A-B), 2 mm (C-F).

    img-z225-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 161.

    Hormurus hypseloscolus sp. nov., pedipalp chela (A-E), patella (F-J), femur and trochanter (K-O), dorsal (A-B, F-G, K-L), retrolateral (C, H, M), ventral (D, I, N) and prolateral (E, J, O) aspects showing trichobothria pattern. (A, F, K) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2717]). (B-E, G-J, L-O) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2717]). Scale lines: 5 mm.

    img-z226-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 162.

    Hormurus hypseloscolus sp. nov., left pedipalp chelae, retrolateral aspect showing dentate margin of chela fingers (A-B), dorsal aspect showing dentate margin of movable finger (C), ventral aspect showing dentate margin of fixed finger (D). (A, C-D) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2717]). (B) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2717]). Scale lines: 2 mm.

    img-z227-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 163.

    Hormurus hypseloscolus sp. nov., coxae II-IV, sternum, genital operculum and pectines, ventral aspect (A, D), left pecten under UV light (B, E), anterior margin of coxae III (C, F). (A-C) Male holotype (AMNH [LP2717]). (D-F) Female paratype (AMNH [LP2717]). Scale lines: 2 mm.

    img-z229-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 164.

    Hormurus hypseloscolus sp. nov., male holotype (AMNH [LP2717]), right tarsi, ventral (A-D) and retrolateral (E) aspects. (A) Tarsus I. (B) Tarsus II. (C) Tarsus III. (D-E) Tarsus IV. Scale line: 2 mm.

    img-z230-2_01.jpg

    Fig. 165.

    Hormurus hypseloscolus sp. nov., metasoma and telson, lateral (A-B) and ventral (C) aspects. (A) Female (AMNH [LP2717]). (B-C) Male (AMNH [LP2717]). Scale lines: 3 mm.

    img-z231-6_01.jpg

    Fig. 166.

    Hormurus hypseloscolus sp. nov., left hemispermatophore of male holotype (AMNH [LP2717]). (A) Lateral aspect. (B) Anterior aspect. (C) Contralateral aspect. Scale line, 1 mm.

    img-z232-1_01.jpg

    Fig. 167.

    (A) Known localities of Hormurus hypseloscolus sp. nov. on Fergusson Island in the D'Entrecasteaux Archipelago, Milne Bay Province, off the northeastern tip of New Guinea. The color gradient indicates topography and bathymetry. (B) Map of the fifth Archbold Expedition to New Guinea organised by the AMNH. Reproduced from Brass (1959). Locality 4 (mountains between Agamoia and Aluluai), where one female was collected, is indicated with a red square.

    img-z234-1_01.jpg

    Unidentified specimens

    Several specimens examined in the course of this study could not be formally assigned to a known species or described as new taxa because of insufficient data. The absence of adult males or the poor quality of the preserved material prevented an unambiguous taxonomic assessment. The relevant specimens are listed below.

  • AMNH [LP 2741]; 1 juvenile ♀; Papua New Guinea, Central Province, Dorobisoro, 9.45°S, 147.92°E; 8.X.2003; leg. J.D. Slapcinsky.

  • Remark: The specimen appears to have affinities with H. barai sp. nov., but due to the lack of diagnostic characters in immatures and females it is not possible to unambiguously confirm its identity.

  • AMNH [LP 2718]; 1 ♀ or subadult ♀; Papua New Guinea, Morobe Province, Kamiali Guest House, 3 m, coastal forest, 7.30°S, 147.12°E; 12.X.2003; leg. J.D. Slapcinsky & F. Kraus.

  • Remark: The specimen is morphologically similar to those of H. krausi sp. nov., but the pedipalp segments are not as high and the chela more slender than in the latter species. The sex of the specimen (female) and the uncertainty regarding its developmental stage do not permit an unequivocal identification.

  • AMNH (without registration number); 1 ♂, 2 ♀; Papua New Guinea, Goodenough Island, east slopes, 900 m (Fig. 101B) [9°20′13″S, 150°15′32″E]; 25.X.1953; leg. K.M. Wynn, Fourth Archbold Expedition to New Guinea.

  • Remark: The specimens are badly preserved and probably dried up at some point before being placed back into alcohol. Moreover, the first two segments of the male metasoma, which are important for a morphometric diagnosis, are missing. The specimens share characters with those of H. cameroni sp. nov. and H. muyua sp. nov., but cannot be assigned unambiguously to either species. Fresh material needs to be collected to determine the taxonomic status of these specimens.

  • AMNH; 1 ♀, 1 subadult ♀, 1 juvenile ♀; Papua New Guinea, [Milne Bay Province], Cape Vogel Peninsula, Menapi [9°45′35″S, 149°55′54″E], camp 1; 21.III.-4.V.1953; leg. G.M. Tate, Archold Expedition.

  • Remark: Three female specimens from the series collected at the Menapi camp 1 do not belong to H. menapi sp. nov. described above. Their genital opercula are not as elongated as those of H. menapi sp. nov. The lack of males does not permit to accurately identify diagnostic characters to differentiate them from other taxa treated in the present contribution.

  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    We wish to express our gratitude to the following persons: (1) for granting access to collections and preparing loans: Danilo Harms and Nadine Duperré (ZMH), Jason Dunlop and Anya Friederichs (ZMB), Charles Griswold and Al Samuelson (CAS); (2) for providing specimens: Fred Kraus and John Slapcinsky; (3) for providing helpful scientific advice, information and comments, and/or support: Raphaёl Covain, Fred Kraus, Peter Schwendinger, and John Slapcinsky; (4) for producing the habitus colour illustrations: Vladimir Timokhanov; (5) for review and constructive comments on a draft of the manuscript: Edmundo González-Santillán and Peter Schwendinger. The material provided by Fred Kraus and John Slapcinsky was collected during expeditions to Papua New Guinea funded by National Science Foundation grant DEB 0103794 and, in part, by the University of Florida Foundation's John Thomas Ladue McGinty fund. The first author (LM) was supported by a graduate student fellowship from the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) while being a Ph.D. student at the AMNH and at the City University of New York. This research was funded in part by National Science Foundation grants DEB 1926783 and 1146033 to CCA.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (see  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

    REFERENCES

    1.

    Adams D., Collyer M., Kaliontzopoulou A. 2020. Geomorph: Software for geometric morphometric analyses. R package version 3.2.1. Available at  https://cran.r-project.org/package=geomorph (accessed 17.VII.2022). Google Scholar

    2.

    Adams D.C., Rohlf F.J., Slice D.E. 2004. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Italian Journal of Zoology 71: 5–16. Google Scholar

    3.

    Aggerbeck M., Fjeldså J., Christidis L., Fabre P.-H., Jønsson K.A. 2014. Resolving deep lineage divergences in core corvoid passerine birds supports a proto-Papuan island origin. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 70: 272–285. Google Scholar

    4.

    Alexander A.J. 1956. Mating in scorpions. Nature 178: 867–868. Google Scholar

    5.

    Allison A. 2007. Introduction to the Fauna of Papua (pp. 479–494). In : Marshall A.J., Beehler B.M. (Eds). The Ecology of Papua. The Ecology of Indonesia Series, vol. IX. Periplus Press , Singapore , 784 pp. Google Scholar

    6.

    Althaus S., Jacob A., Graber W., Hofer D., Nentwig W., Kropf C. 2010. A double role of sperm in scorpions: The mating plug of Euscorpius italicus (Scorpiones: Euscorpiidae) consists of sperm. Journal of Morphology 271: 383–393. Google Scholar

    7.

    Anderson C.M., Langerhans R.B. 2015. Origins of female genital diversity: Predation risk and lock-and-key explain rapid divergence during an adaptive radiation. Evolution 69(9): 2452–2467. Google Scholar

    8.

    Angermann H. 1957. Über Verhalten, Spermatophorenbildung und Sinnesphysiologie von Euscorpius italicus Herbst und verwandten Arten (Scorpiones, Chactidae). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 14: 276–302. Google Scholar

    9.

    Anonymous 1949. Alphabetical listing of APO's, January 1942-November 1947. Army Postal Service and Strength Accounting Branches , AGO, 149 pp. Google Scholar

    10.

    Arnqvist G. 1998. Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 393: 784–786. Google Scholar

    11.

    Arnqvist G., Rowe L. 2002. Correlated evolution of male and female morphologies in water striders. Evolution 56: 936–947. Google Scholar

    12.

    Arnqvist G., Edvardsson M., Friberg U., Nilsson T. 2000. Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97(19): 10460–10464. Google Scholar

    13.

    Baldwin S.L., Fitzgerald P.G., Webb L.E. 2012. Tectonics of the New Guinea Region. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 40: 495–520. Google Scholar

    14.

    Balke M. 1998. Revision of New Guinea Copelatus Erichson, 1832 (Insecta: Coleoptera: Dytiscidae): The running water species, part I. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien, Serie B für Botanik und Zoologie 100: 301–341. Google Scholar

    15.

    Barnard A.A., Fincke O.M., McPeek M.A., Masly J.P. 2017. Mechanical and tactile incompatibilities cause reproductive isolation between two young damselfly species. Evolution 71(10): 2410–2427. Google Scholar

    16.

    Becker J.J., Sandwell D.T., Smith W.H.F., Braud J., Binder B., Depner J., Fabre D., Factor J., Ingalls S., Kim S.-H., Ladner R., Marks K., Nelson S., Pharaoh A., Trimmer R., Von Rosenberg J., Wallace G., Weatherall P. 2009. Global bathymetry and elevation data at 30 arc seconds resolution: SRTM30_PLUS. Marine Geodesy 32: 355–371. Available at http://topex.ucsd.edu/WWW_html/srtm30_plus.html(accessed 17.VIII.2022). Google Scholar

    17.

    Bookstein F.L. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge University Press , Cambridge , 456 pp. Google Scholar

    18.

    Bookstein F.L. 1996. Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 58: 313–365. Google Scholar

    19.

    Bookstein F.L. 1997. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: localizing group differences in outline shape. Medical Image Analysis 1: 225–243. Google Scholar

    20.

    Bookstein F.L. 1998. A hundred years of morphometrics. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 44: 7–59. Google Scholar

    21.

    Brass L.J. 1956. Results of the Archbold Expeditions, nr. 75. Summary of the fourth Archbold Expedition to New Guinea (1953). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 111(2): 1–152. Google Scholar

    22.

    Brass L.J. 1959. Results of the Archbold Expeditions, nr. 79. Summary of the fifth Archbold Expedition to New Guinea (1956-1957). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 118: 1–69. Google Scholar

    23.

    Brass L.J. 1964. Results of the Archbold Expeditions, nr. 86. Summary of the sixth Archbold Expedition to New Guinea (1959). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 127: 1–215. Google Scholar

    24.

    Brennan P.L.R., Prum R.O. 2015. Mechanisms and evidence of genital coevolution: the roles of natural selection, mate choice, and sexual conflict. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 7(7): a017749. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a017749 Google Scholar

    25.

    Broun T. 1886. New Zealand Coleoptera. Part IV (pp. 817–973). In : Hector J. (Ed.). Manual of the New Zealand Coleoptera. Colonial Museum & Geological Survey Department, George Disdury , Wellington , 1504 pp. Google Scholar

    26.

    Cámara-Leret R., Frodin D.G., Adema F., Anderson C., Appelhans M.S., Argent G., Arias Guerrero S., Ashton P., Baker W.J., Barfod A.S., Barrington D., Borosova R., Bramley G.L.C., Briggs M., Buerki S., Cahen D., Callmander M.W., Cheek M., Chen C.-W., Conn B.J., Coode M.J.E., Darbyshire I., Dawson S., Dransfield J., Drinkell C., Duyfjes B., Ebihara A., Ezedin Z., Fu L.-F., Gideon O., Girmansyah D., Govaerts R., Fortune-Hopkins H., Hassemer G., Hay A., Heatubun C.D., Hind D.J.N., Hoch P., Homot P., Hovenkamp P., Hughes M., Jebb M., Jennings L., Jimbo T., Kessler M., Kiew R., Knapp S., Lamei P., Lehnert M., Lewis G.P., Linder H.P., Lindsay S., Low Y.W., Lucas E., Mancera J.P., Monro A.K., Moore A., Middleton D.J., Nagamasu H., Newman M.F., Nic Lughadha E., Melo P.H.A., Ohlsen D.J., Pannell C.M., Parris B., Pearce L., Penneys D.S., Perrie L.R., Petoe P., Poulsen A.D., Prance G.T., Quakenbush J.P., Raes N., Rodda M., Rogers Z.S., Schuiteman A., Schwartsburd P., Scotland R.W., Simmons M.P., Simpson D.A., Stevens P., Sundue M., Testo W., Trias-Blasi A., Turner I., Utteridge T., Walsingham L., Webber B.L., Wei R., Weiblen G.D., Weigend M., Weston P., De Wilde W., Wilkie P., Wilmot-Dear C.M., Wilson H.P., Wood J.R.I., Zhang L.-B., Van Welzen P.C. 2020. New Guinea has the world's richest island flora. Nature 584: 579–583. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2549-5 Google Scholar

    27.

    Cerullo G. 2019. Logging, mining companies lock eyes on a biodiverse island like no other. Available at https://news.mongabay.com/2019/07/logging-mining-companies-lock-eyes-on-a-biodiverse-island-like-no-other/(accessed on line 17.VIII.2022). Google Scholar

    28.

    Cerullo G. 2020. Land grab, logging, mining threaten biodiversity haven of Woodlark Island. Available at https://news.mongabay.com/2020/10/land-grab-logging-mining-threaten-biodiversity-haven-of-woodlark-island/(accessed on line 17.VIII.2022). Google Scholar

    29.

    Chapman A.D. 2020. Current best practices for generalizing sensitive species occurrence data [Community review draft]. Global Biodiversity Information Facility Secretariat , Copenhagen , 48 pp. https://doi.org/10.15468/doc-5jp4-5g10 (accessed 17.viii.2022) Google Scholar

    30.

    Chapman A.D., Grafton O. 2008. Guide to best practices for generalising primary species occurence data, version 1.0. Global Biodiversity Information Facility Secretariat , Copenhagen , 27 pp. https://doi.org/10.15468/doc-b02j-gt10Google Scholar

    31.

    Cheesman L.E. 1935. An expedition to the mountains of Papua. Natural History Magazine 5(33): 19–37. Google Scholar

    32.

    Couzijn H.W.C. 1976. Functional anatomy of the walking-legs of Scorpionida with remarks on terminology and homologization of leg segments. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 26: 453–501. Google Scholar

    33.

    Coyne J.A., Orr H.A. 1998. The evolutionary genetics of speciation. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological sciences 353(1366): 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0210 Google Scholar

    34.

    De Boer A.J., Duffels J.P. 1996. Historical biogeography of the cicadas of Wallacea, New Guinea and the West Pacific, a geotectonic explanation. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 124: 153–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-0182(96)00007-7 Google Scholar

    35.

    Deiner K., Lemmon A.R., Mack A.L., Fleischer R.C., Dumbacher J.P. 2011. A passerine bird's evolution corroborates the geologic history of the island of New Guinea. PloS ONE 6: e19479. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019479 Google Scholar

    36.

    De Wilde J. 1964. Reproduction (pp. 9–58). In : Rockstein M. (Ed.). Physiology of Insecta. Academic Press , New York , 588 pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/c2013-0-11389-x Google Scholar

    37.

    Dryden I.L., Mardia K.V. 1993. Multivariate shape analysis. Sankhya 55: 460–480. Google Scholar

    38.

    Dufour L. 1844. Anatomie générale des diptères. Annales des Sciences Naturelles 1: 244–264. Google Scholar

    39.

    Dutton T.E. 1969. The peopling of Central Papua: Some preliminary observations. Pacific Linguistics, series B, 9. Department of Linguistics Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University , Canberra , 182 pp. Google Scholar

    40.

    Dutton T.E. 1971. Languages of South-East Papua: A preliminary report. Papers in New Guinea linguistics nr. 14., series A 28: 1–46. Google Scholar

    41.

    Dutton T.E. 1973. A checklist of languages and present-day villages of central and south-east mainland Papua. Pacific Linguistics, series B, 24. Department of Linguistics Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University , Canberra , 80 pp. Google Scholar

    42.

    Eberhard W.G. 1985. Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Harvard University Press , Cambridge, Massachusetts , 244 pp. Google Scholar

    43.

    Eberhard W.G. 1992. Species isolation, genital mechanics, and the evolution of species-specific genitalia in three species of Macrodactylus beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabeidae, Melolonthinae). Evolution 46(6): 1774–1783. Google Scholar

    44.

    Eberhard W.G. 1996. Female control: Sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press , Princeton, New Jersey , 472 pp. Google Scholar

    45.

    Ehrenberg C.G. 1828. Animalia articulata. Arachnoidea. Scorpiones. Africani et asiatici. In : Hemprich W.F., Ehrenberg C.G. (Eds). Symbolae physicae. Animalia evertebrata exclusis insectis. Ex Officina Academica , Berolini , https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.107403 Google Scholar

    46.

    Fabricius J.C. 1775. Scorpions (pp. 399–400). In : Systema entomologiae, sistens insectorum classes, ordines, genera, species, adjectis synonymis, locis, descriptionibus, observationibus. Officina Libraria Kortii, Flensburgi et Lipsiae , 832 pp. Google Scholar

    47.

    Fage L. 1933. Les scorpions de l'Indochine française, leur affinités, leur distribution géographique. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 102: 25–34. Google Scholar

    48.

    Fauvel A. 1862. Coléoptères de la Nouvelle-Calédonie, recueillis par M. E. Déplanche, chirurgien de la marine impériale (1858-59-60). Bulletin de la Société Linnéenne de Normandie 7: 120–185. Google Scholar

    49.

    Fet V., Sissom W.D., Lowe G., Braunwalder M.E. 2000. Catalog of the scorpions of the world (1758-1998). New York Entomological Society , New York , 690 pp. Google Scholar

    50.

    Fisher R.A. 1936. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics 7: 179–188.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02137.x Google Scholar

    51.

    Forster P.I. 1997. Len Brass and his contribution to palm discoveries in New Guinea and the Solomon Islands. Principes 41: 158–162. Google Scholar

    52.

    Francke O.F. 1982. Studies of the scorpion subfamilies Superstitioninae and Typhlochactinae with description of a new genus (Scorpiones, Chactoidea). Bulletin of the Texas Memorial Museum 28: 51–61 (= Association for Mexican Cave Studies Bulletin 8: 51-61). Google Scholar

    53.

    Francke O.F., Soleglad M.E. 1981. The family Iuridae Thorell (Arachnida, Scorpiones). Journal of Arachnology 9(3): 233–258. Google Scholar

    54.

    Frawley W. 2003. International encyclopedia of linguistics. Volume 3. Oxford University Press Oxford , New York , 456 pp. Google Scholar

    55.

    Frodin D.G., Gressitt J.L. 1982. Biological exploration of New Guinea (pp. 87–130). In : Gressitt J.L. (Eds). Biogeography and ecology of New Guinea. Dr. W. Junk Publishers , The Hague , 966 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8632-9_6 Google Scholar

    56.

    Garner B., Touzel G. 2018. “The person herself is not interesting” Lucy Evelyn Cheesman's life dedicated to the faunistic exploration of the Southwest Pacific. Collections: A Journal for Museum and Archives Professionals 14(4): 497–532. Google Scholar

    57.

    Georges A., Zhang X., Unmack P., Reid B.N., Le M., McCord W.P. 2014. Contemporary genetic structure of an endemic freshwater turtle reflects Miocene orogenesis of New Guinea. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 111: 192–208. Google Scholar

    58.

    Gervais P. 1843. Les principaux résultats d'un travail sur la famille des scorpions. Société Philomatique de Paris, Extraits des Procès-Verbaux des Séances 5(7): 129–131. Google Scholar

    59.

    Gilliard E.T. 1969. Appendix 2. List of ornithological explorations in the New Guinea and Moluccan regions (pp. 415–461). In : Gilliard E.T. (Ed.). Birds of paradise and bower birds. Weidenfeld & Nicholson, London , 416 pp. Google Scholar

    60.

    González-Santillán E., Alvarez Padilla F. 2015. The male of Megacormus granosus (Gervais, 1844) with comments on its hemispermatophore (Scorpiones, Euscorpiidae). Zookeys 504: 75–91.  https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.504.9027 Google Scholar

    61.

    González-Santillán E., Prendini L. 2013. Redefinition and generic revision of the North American vaejovid scorpion subfamily Syntropinae Kraepelin, 1905, with descriptions of six new genera. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 382: 1–71. https://doi.org/10.1206/830.1 Google Scholar

    62.

    González-Santillán E., Prendini L. 2015. Systematic revision of the North American syntropine vaejovid scorpions with a subaculear tubercle, Konetontli González-Santillán and Prendini, 2013. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 397: 1–78. https://doi.org/10.1206/907.1 Google Scholar

    63.

    González-Santillán E., Prendini L. 2016. Systematic revision of the North American syntropine vaejovid scorpion genera Maaykuyak, Syntropis, and Vizcaino, with description of the adults of Syntropis williamsi. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 405: 1–68. Google Scholar

    64.

    González Santillán E., González-Ruíz J., Escobedo L. 2017. A new species of Megacormus (Scorpiones, Euscorpiidae) from an oak-pine forest in Guanajuato, México with an identification key to the species in the genus. Zootaxa 4299: 221. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4299.2.3 Google Scholar

    65.

    Gower J.C. 1975. Generalized Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40: 33–51. Google Scholar

    66.

    Green W.D.K. 1996. The thin-plate spline and images with curving features (pp. 79–87). In : Mardia K.V., Gill C.A., Dryden I.L. (Eds). Image fusion and shape variability techniques. University of Leeds Press , Leeds , 228 pp. Google Scholar

    67.

    Gressitt J.L. 1982. Biogeography and ecology of New Guinea. Volumes 1 & 2. Dr. W. Junk Publishers , The Hague , 966 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8632-9 Google Scholar

    68.

    Günther R., Richards S.J. 2011. Five new microhylid frog species from Enga Province, Papua New Guinea, and remarks on Albericus alpestris (Anura, Microhylidae). Vertebrate Zoology 61: 343–372. Google Scholar

    69.

    Günther R., Richards S.J., Dahl C. 2014. Nine new species of microhylid frogs from the Muller Range in western Papua New Guinea (Anura, Microhylidae). Vertebrate Zoology 64: 59–94. Google Scholar

    70.

    Hall R. 1998. The plate tectonics of Cenozoic SE Asia and the distribution of land and sea (pp. 99–131). In : Hall R., Holloway J.D. (Eds). Biogeography and geological evolution of SE Asia. Backhuys Publishers , Leiden , 419 pp. Google Scholar

    71.

    Hall R. 2002. Cenozoic geological and plate tectonic evolution of SE Asia and the SW Pacific: computer-based reconstructions, model and animations. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 20: 353–434. Google Scholar

    72.

    Hance J. 2008. How activists and scientists saved a rainforest island from destruction for palm oil. Available at https://news.mongabay.com/2008/02/how-activists-and-scientists-saved-a-rainforest-island-from-destruction-for-palm-oil/(accessed 17.VIII.2022). Google Scholar

    73.

    Hance J. 2014. Top scientists raise concerns over commercial logging on Woodlark Island. Available at  https://news.mongabay.com/2014/10/top-scientists-raise-concerns-over-commercial-logging-on-woodlark-island/ (accessed 17.VIII.2022). Google Scholar

    74.

    Hill K.C., Hall R. 2003. Mesozoic-Cenozoic evolution of Australia's New Guinea margin in a West Pacific context (pp. 265–289). In : Hillis R.R., Müller R.D. (Eds). Evolution and dynamics of the Australian Plate. Geological Society of Australia Special Publication 22/Geological Society of America Special Papers 372 , 432 pp. https://doi.org/10.1130/0-8137-2372-8.265 Google Scholar

    75.

    Holland B., Rice W.R. 1999. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96: 5083–5088. Google Scholar

    76.

    Horner B.E., Van Gelder R.G. 1979. Hobart Merritt Van Deusen - 1910-1976. Journal of Mammalogy 60(4): 859–860. Google Scholar

    77.

    Hotelling H. 1933a. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. The Journal of Educational Psychology 24: 417–441. Google Scholar

    78.

    Hotelling H. 1933b. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components (continued from September issue). The Journal of Educational Psychology 24: 498–520. Google Scholar

    79.

    Jacob A., Gantenbein I., Braunwalder M.E., Nentwig W., Kropf C. 2004a. Morphology and function of male genitalia (spermatophores) in Euscorpius italicus (Euscorpiidae, Scorpiones): Complex spermatophore structures enable safe sperm transfer. Journal of Morphology 260(1): 72–84. Google Scholar

    80.

    Jacob A., Gantenbein B., Braunwalder M.E., Nentwig W.L. 2004b. Complex male genitalia (hemispermatophores) are not diagnostic for cryptic species in the genus Euscorpious (Scorpiones: Euscorpiidae). Organisms Diversity and Evolution 4: 59–72. Google Scholar

    81.

    Jarvis A., Reuter H.I., Nelson A., Guevara E. 2008. Hole-filled seamless SRTM data V4. International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) , Rome . Available at http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org(accessed 17.VIII.2022). Google Scholar

    82.

    Jombart T. 2008. Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24: 1403–1405. Google Scholar

    83.

    Jombart T., Devillard S., Balloux F. 2010. Discriminant analysis of principal components: A new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genetics 11: 94. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-94 Google Scholar

    84.

    Jønsson K.A., Fabre P.-H., Ricklefs R.E., Fjeldså J. 2011. Major global radiation of corvoid birds originated in the proto-Papuan archipelago. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 2328–2333. Google Scholar

    85.

    Kalkman V.J., Dijkstra K.B., Dow R.A., Stokvis F.R., Van Tol J. 2013. Studies on phylogeny and biogeography of damselflies (Odonata) with emphasis on the Argiolestidae. Ph. D. thesis, Leiden University , 224 pp. Google Scholar

    86.

    Kalkman V.J., Dijkstra K.B., Dow R.A., Stokvis F.R., Van Tol J. 2017. Out of Australia: The Argiolestidae reveal the Melanesian Arc System and East Papua Composite Terrane as possible ancient dispersal routes to the Indo-Australian archipelago (Odonata, Argiolestidae). International Journal of Odonatology 21: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13887890.2017.1402825Google Scholar

    87.

    Kamimura Y., Mitsumoto H. 2012. Lock-and-key structural isolationbetweensiblingDrosophilaspecies. Entomological Science 15(2): 197–201. Google Scholar

    88.

    Kendall M. 1938. A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30(1-2): 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/30.1-2.81 Google Scholar

    89.

    Kendall D.G. 1984. Shape-manifolds, Procrustean metrics and complex projective spaces. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 16: 81–121. Google Scholar

    90.

    Keyserling G.E. 1885. Die Arachniden Australiens. Ordo Scorpiones (pp. 20–33). In : Koch L., Keyserling G.E. (Eds). Die Arachniden Australiens nach der Natur beschrieben und abgebildet, 2(32). Bauer & Raspe Verlag , Nürnberg , 48 pp. Google Scholar

    91.

    Klingenberg C.P. 2020. Walking on Kendall's shape space: Understanding shape spaces and their coordinate systems. Evolutionary Biology 47: 334–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-020-09513-x Google Scholar

    92.

    Koch C.L. 1837. Übersicht des Arachnidensystems. Volume 5. C.H. Zeh‘sche Buchhandlung , Nürnberg , 40 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.39561 Google Scholar

    93.

    Koch C.L. 1845. Die Arachniden: Getreu nach der Natur abgebildet und beschrieben. Volume 12. C.H. Zeh'schen Buchhandlung , Nürnberg , 166 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.43744 Google Scholar

    94.

    Koch L.E. 1977. The taxonomy, geographic distribution and evolutionary radiation of Australo-Papuan scorpions. Records of the Western Australian Museum 5(2): 83–367. Google Scholar

    95.

    Kopstein P.F. 1921. Die Skorpione des Indo-Australischen Archipels. Mit Grundlage der in holländischen Sammlungen, vornähmlich des Rijks-Museums in Leiden, vorhandenen Arten. Zoologische Mededelingen 6: 115–144. Google Scholar

    96.

    Kraepelin K. 1914. Die Skorpione und Pedipalpen von Neu-Caledonien und den benachbarten Inselgruppen (pp. 327–337). In : Sarasin F., Roux J. (Eds). Nova Caledonia. A. Zoologie. Volume 1. Issue 4. Chapter 8. C. W. Kreidels Verlag , Wiesbaden , 449 pp. Google Scholar

    97.

    Kraus F. 2011. New frogs (Anura: Microhylidae) from the mountains of western Papua New Guinea. Records of the Australian Museum 63: 53–60. https://doi.org/10.3853/j.0067-1975.63.2011.1584 Google Scholar

    98.

    Kraus F. 2013a. Three new species of Oreophryne (Anura, Microhylidae) from Papua New Guinea. ZooKeys 333: 93–121. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.333.5795 Google Scholar

    99.

    Kraus F. 2013b. Two new species of frogs related to Barygenys exsul (Microhylidae) from New Guinea. Herpetologica 69(3): 314–328. Google Scholar

    100.

    Kraus F. 2014. A new species of Liophryne (Anura: Microhylidae) from Papua New Guinea. Journal of Herpetology 48(2): 255–261. https://doi.org/10.1670/12-252 Google Scholar

    101.

    Kraus F. 2015. A new species of the miniaturized frog genus Paedophryne (Anura: Microhylidae) from Papua New Guinea. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 745: 1–11. Google Scholar

    102.

    Kraus F. 2016. Ten new species of Oreophryne (Anura, Microhylidae) from Papua New Guinea. Zootaxa 4195(1): 1–68. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4195.1.1 Google Scholar

    103.

    Kraus F. 2017a. A new species of Oreophryne (Anura: Microhylidae) from the mountains of southeastern Papua New Guinea. Current Herpetology 36(2): 105–115. Google Scholar

    104.

    Kraus F. 2017b. A new insular species of Oreophryne (Anura, Microhylidae) from Papua New Guinea. Journal of Herpetology 51(4): 552–558. https://doi.org/10.1670/17-002 Google Scholar

    105.

    Kraus F. 2018. A new species of Choerophryne (Anura: Microhylidae) from Papua New Guinea. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 131(1): 53–60. https://doi.org/10.2988/17-00027 Google Scholar

    106.

    Kraus F. 2019a. A revision of Callulops doriae (Anura: Microhylidae), with descriptions of four new species. Zootaxa 4612(1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4612.1.1 Google Scholar

    107.

    Kraus F. 2019b. New species of Lepidodactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from New Guinea and adjacent islands. Zootaxa 4651(2): 305–329. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4651.2.7 Google Scholar

    108.

    Kraus F. 2021. A herpetofauna with dramatic endemism signals an overlooked biodiversity hotspot. Biodiversity and Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02242-3 Google Scholar

    109.

    Kraus F., Allison A. 2006. Three new species of Cophixalus (Anura: Microhylidae) from southeastern New Guinea. Herpetologica 62: 202–220. Google Scholar

    110.

    Kugelann J.G. 1794. Verzeichniß der in einigen Gegenden Preußens bis jetzt entdeckten Käfer-Arten, nebst kurzen Nachrichten von denselben (pp. 513–582). In : Schneider D.H. (Ed.). Neuestes Magazin für die Liebhaber der Entomologie. Volume 1 (5). Struck Verlag , Stralsund , 640 pp. Available at  https://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/id/PPN605435669_0001?tify (Accessed 9.XII.2022) Google Scholar

    111.

    Lachenbruch P.A., Goldstein M. 1979. Discriminant analysis. Biometrics 35: 69–85. Google Scholar

    112.

    Lamoral B.H. 1979. The scorpions of Namibia (Arachnida: Scorpionida). Annals of the Natal Museum 23(3): 497–784. Google Scholar

    113.

    Latreille P.A. 1802. Histoire naturelle générale et particulière des crustacés et des insectes. Volume 3. F. Dufart , Paris , 467 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.169285 Google Scholar

    114.

    Latreille P.A. 1819. Trachélides (pp. 362–364). In : Nouveau dictionnaire d'histoire naturelle, appliquée aux arts, à l'agriculture, à l'économie rurale et domestique, à la médecine, etc. Tome 34. Chez Déterville , Paris , 578 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.20211 Google Scholar

    115.

    Laurie M. 1896. Further notes on the anatomy and development of scorpions, and their bearing on the classification of the order. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (série 6) 18(104): 9–133. Google Scholar

    116.

    Leach W.E. 1815. Entomology (pp. 57–172). In : Brewster D. (Ed.). The Edinburgh encyclopaedia. Vol. 9, Part 1. Baldwin , Edinburgh , 764 pp. Google Scholar

    117.

    Lourenço W.R. 1987. Révision systématique des scorpions du genre Opisthacanthus (Scorpiones: Ischnuridae). Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle 9(4): 887–931. Google Scholar

    118.

    Lourenço W.R. 1989. Rétablissement de la famille des Ischnuridae, distincte des Scorpionidae Pocock, 1893, à partir de la sous-famille des Ischnurinae Pocock, 1893. Revue Arachnologique 8(10): 159–77. Google Scholar

    119.

    Lourenço W.R. 2011. Scorpions from West Papua, Indonesia and description of a new species of Lychas C. L. Koch, 1845 (Scorpiones: Buthidae). Entomologische Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum Hamburg 15(186): 317–326. Google Scholar

    120.

    Lourenço W.R., Qi J.-X. 2007. Scorpions from the rainforest canopy of New Guinea and description of a new subspecies of Lychas C. L. Koch, 1845 (Scorpiones: Buthidae). Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des sciences naturelles de Belgique, Entomologie 77: 157–161. Google Scholar

    121.

    Maddison W.P. 2009. New cocalodine jumping spiders from Papua New Guinea (Araneae: Salticidae: Cocalodinae). Zootaxa 2021: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2021.1.1 Google Scholar

    122.

    Maddison W.P. 2016. Papuaneon, a new genus of jumping spiders from Papua New Guinea (Araneae: Salticidae: Neonini). Zootaxa 4200(3): 437–443. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4200.3.9 Google Scholar

    123.

    Maddison W.P., Szűts T. 2019. Myrmarachnine jumping spiders of the new subtribe Levieina from Papua New Guinea (Araneae, Salticidae, Myrmarachnini). Zootaxa 2021: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4200.3.9 Google Scholar

    124.

    Maddison W.P., Zhang J. 2009. Chapter 14. Salticid Spiders of Papua New Guinea (pp. 186–189). In : Richards S.J., Gamui B.G. (Eds). Rapid biological assessments of the Nakanai Mountains and the upper Strickland Basin: surveying the biodiversity of Papua New Guinea's sublime karst environments. Conservation International , Arlington, VA , 258 pp. https://doi.org/10.1896/054.060.0119 Google Scholar

    125.

    Masly J.P. 2012 .170 Years of “lock-and-key”: Genital morphology and reproductive isolation. International Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2012: 247352. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/247352 Google Scholar

    126.

    Mattoni C.I., Acosta L.E. 2005. A new species of Bothriurus from Brazil (Scorpiones, Bothriuridae). Journal of Arachnology 33(3): 735–744. Google Scholar

    127.

    Maury E.A. 1975. Escorpiones y escorpionismo en el Perú. V: Orobothriurus, un nuevo género de escorpiones altoandinos. Revista Peruana de Entomología 18: 14–25. Google Scholar

    128.

    Maury E.A. 1980. Usefulness of the hemispermatophore in the systematics of the scorpion family Bothriuridae (pp. 335–339). In : Gruber J. (Ed.). Proceedings of the 8th International Arachnology Congress (Vienna). H. Egermann Verlag , Wien , 506 pp. Google Scholar

    129.

    Mikkola K. 1992. Evidence for lock-and-key mechanisms in the internal genitalia of the Apamea moths (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). Systematic Entomology 17: 145–153. Google Scholar

    130.

    Mittermeier R.A., Myers N., Thomsen J.B., Da Fonseca G.A.B., Olivieri S. 1998. Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: Approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conservation Biology 12(3): 516–520. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012003516.x Google Scholar

    131.

    Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G., Brooks T.M., Pilgrim J.D., Konstant W.R., Da Fonseca G.A.B., Kormos C. 2003. Wilderness and biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 100(18): 10309–10313. Google Scholar

    132.

    Monod L. 2000. Révision systématique du genre Liocheles (Ischnuridae, Scorpiones). Unpublished M. Sc. thesis, University of Geneva , 143 pp. Google Scholar

    133.

    Monod L. 2011a. The Liochelidae Fet & Bechly, 2001 (Scorpiones) of the Indo-Pacific region, systematics and biogeography. Unpublished Ph. D. thesis, City University of New York , New York , 84 pp. Google Scholar

    134.

    Monod L. 2011b. Taxonomic emendations in the genus Liocheles Sundevall, 1833 (Scorpiones, Liochelidae). Revue suisse de Zoologie 118(4): 723–758. Google Scholar

    135.

    Monod L. 2015. Systematics of the genus Hormiops Fage, 1933 (Hormuridae, Scorpiones). Revue suisse de Zoologie 122(2): 247–282. Google Scholar

    136.

    Monod L., Lourenço W.R. 2005. Hemiscorpiidae (Scorpiones) from Iran, with descriptions of two new species and notes on biogeography and phylogenetic relationships. Revue suisse de Zoologie 112(4): 869–941. Google Scholar

    137.

    Monod L., Prendini L. 2015. Evidence for Eurogondwana: The roles of dispersal, extinction and vicariance in the evolution and biogeography of Indo-Pacific Hormuridae (Scorpiones: Scorpionoidea). Cladistics 31: 71–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12067 Google Scholar

    138.

    Monod L., Volschenk E.S. 2004. Liocheles litodactylus (Scorpiones: Liochelidae): an unusual new Liocheles species from the Australian Wet Tropics (Queensland). Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 49(2): 675–690. Google Scholar

    139.

    Monod L., Harvey M. S., Prendini L. 2013. Stenotopic Hormurus Thorell, 1876 scorpions from the monsoon ecosystems of northern Australia, with a discussion on the evolution of burrowing behavious in Hormuridae Laurie, 1896. Revue suisse de Zoologie 120(2): 281–346. Google Scholar

    140.

    Monod L., Cauwet L., González-Santillán E., Huber S. 2017. The male sexual apparatus in the order Scorpiones (Arachnida): A comparative study of functional morphology as a tool to define hypotheses of homology. Frontiers in Zoology 14: article 51.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-017-0231-z Google Scholar

    141.

    Monod L., Dupérré N., Harms D. 2019. An annotated catalogue of the scorpion types (Arachnida, Scorpiones) held in the Zoological Museum Hamburg. Part I: Parvorder Iurida Soleglad & Fet, 2003. Evolutionary Systematics 3(2): 109–200.  https://doi.org/10.3897/evolsyst.3.37464 Google Scholar

    142.

    Mosimann J.E. 1970. Size allometry: Size and shape variables with characterizations of the lognormal and generalized gamma distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 65: 930–948. Google Scholar

    143.

    Moyle R.G., Oliveros C.H., Andersen M.J., Hosner P.A., Benz B.W., Manthey J.D., Travers S.L., Brown R.M., Faircloth B.C. 2016. Tectonic collision and uplift of Wallacea triggered the global songbird radiation. Nature Communications 7: 12709. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12709 Google Scholar

    144.

    Mulsant E. 1844. Histoire naturelle des coléoptères de France - Palpicornes. L. Maison , Paris ; Ch. Savy Jeune, Lyon , 196 pp. Google Scholar

    145.

    Neuhauss R.G. 1909. Prof. Dr. R. Neuhauss über seine Reise in Kaiser Wilhelm-Land. Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Erdkunde zu Berlin 10: 689–690. Google Scholar

    146.

    Neuhauss R.G. 1911. Deutsche Neu-Guinea. Volume 1. D. Reimer (E. Vohsen) , Berlin , 534 pp. Google Scholar

    147.

    Newman E. 1838. Entomological notes. Entomological Magazine 5: 372–402. Google Scholar

    148.

    Ochoa J.A., Ojanguren-Affilastro A.A., Mattoni C.I., Prendini L. 2011. Systematic revision of the Andean scorpion genus Orobothriurus Maury, 1976 (Bothriuridae), with discussion of the altitude record for scorpions. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 359: 1–90. Google Scholar

    149.

    Oliver P.M., Brown R.M., Kraus F., Rittmeyer E., Travers S.L., Siler C.D. 2018. Lizards of the lost arcs: Mid-Cenozoic diversification, persistence and ecological marginalization in the West Pacific. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285(1871): article20171760. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1760 Google Scholar

    150.

    Paijmans K. 1975a. Vegetation of Papua New Guinea [map with explanatory notes]. Scale 1:1 000 000. Land Research Series No. 35. CSIRO , MelbourneGoogle Scholar

    151.

    Paijmans K. 1975b. Explanatory notes to the vegetation map of Papua New Guinea. CSIRO Land Research Surveys 35: 1–45. Google Scholar

    152.

    Paijmans K. 1976. New Guinea vegetation. Australian National University Press , Canberra , 213 pp. Google Scholar

    153.

    Parker G.A., Partridge L. 1998. Sexual conflict and speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological sciences 353(1366): 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0208 Google Scholar

    154.

    Pearson K. 1901. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine 2: 559–572. Google Scholar

    155.

    Peretti A.V. 2010. An ancient indirect sex model: Single and mixed patterns in the evolution of scorpion genitalia (pp. 218–248). In : Còrdoba-Aguilar A., Leonard J.L. (Eds). The evolution of primary sexual characters in animals. Oxford University Press , Oxford , 537 pp. Google Scholar

    156.

    Perkins P.D. 2011. New species (130) of the hyperdiverse aquatic beetle genus Hydraena Kugelann from Papua New Guinea, and a preliminary analysis of areas of endemism (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae). Zootaxa 2944: 1–417. Google Scholar

    157.

    Perry L.M. 1971. Leonard J. Brass (1900-1971), an appreciation. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 52(4): 695–698. Google Scholar

    158.

    Peters W. 1861. 27. Mai. Sitzung der physikalischmathematischen Klasse: Scorpiones. Monatsberichte der Königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1861(1): 507–516. Google Scholar

    159.

    Pigram C.J., Davies H.L. 1987. Terranes and the accretion history of the New Guinea orogen. BMR Journal of Australian Geology & Geophysics 10: 193–212. Google Scholar

    160.

    Polhemus D.A 1996. Island arcs, and their influence on Indo-Pacific biogeography (pp. 51–66). In : Keast A., Miller S.E. (Eds). The origin and evolution of Pacific island biotas, New Guinea to eastern Polynesia: Patterns and processes. SPB Academic Publishing , Amsterdam, The Netherlands , 531 pp. Google Scholar

    161.

    Prendini L. 2000. Phylogeny and classification of the superfamily Scorpionoidea Latreille 1802 (Chelicerata, Scorpiones): An exemplar approach. Cladistics 16(1): 1–78. Google Scholar

    162.

    Prendini L. 2016. Redefinition and systematic revision of the East African scorpion genus Pandinoides (Scorpiones, Scorpionidae) with critique of the taxonomy of Pandinus, sensu lato. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 407: 1–66. Google Scholar

    163.

    Prendini L., Francke O.F., Vignoli V. 2010. Troglomorphism, trichobothriotaxy and typhlochactid phylogeny (Scorpiones, Chactoidea): More evidence that troglobitism is not an evolutionary dead-end. Cladistics 26: 117–142. Google Scholar

    164.

    Puth M.-T., Neuhäuser M., Ruxton G. 2015. Effective use of Spearman's and Kendall's correlation coefficients for association between two measured traits. Animal Behaviour 102: 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.01.010 Google Scholar

    165.

    R Development Core Team 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing , Vienna, Austria . Available at http://www.Rproject.org(accessed 17.VIII.2022). Google Scholar

    166.

    Ribeiro J.R.I., Inacio Stefanello F., Bugs C., Stenert C., Maltchik L., Guilbert E. 2019. Coevolution between male and female genitalia in Belostoma angustum Lauck, 1964 (Insecta, Heteroptera, Belostomatidae): Disentangling size and shape. Zoology 137: 125711. Google Scholar

    167.

    Riedel A., Daawia D., Balke M. 2010. Deep cox1 divergence and hyperdiversity of Trigonopterus weevils in a New Guinea mountain range (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). Zoologica Scripta 39(1): 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.2009.00404.x Google Scholar

    168.

    Riedel A., Sagata K., Surbakti S., Tänzler R., Balke M. 2013. One hundred and one new species of Trigonopterus weevils from New Guinea. Zookeys 280: 1–150. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.280.3906 Google Scholar

    169.

    Rivera J.A., Kraus F., Allison A., Butler M.A. 2017. Molecular phylogenetics and dating of the problematic New Guinea microhylid frogs (Amphibia: Anura) reveals elevated speciation rates and need for taxonomic reclassification. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 112: 1–11. Google Scholar

    170.

    Robby M. 2020. Court ruling unsettles islanders. The National. Available at  https://www.thenational.com.pg/court-rulingunsettles-islanders/ (accessed 7.IX.2022). Google Scholar

    171.

    Robinson J.V., Novak K.L. 1997. The relationship between mating system and penis morphology in ischnuran damselflies (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 60: 187–200. Google Scholar

    172.

    Rohlf F.J. 1999. Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. Journal of Classification 16: 197–223. Google Scholar

    173.

    Rohlf F.J. 2004. tpsUtil, file utility program, version 1.26. Available at http://www.sbmorphometrics.org/soft-utility.html(accessed 7.IX.2022). Google Scholar

    174.

    Rohlf F.J. 2006. tpsDig, version 2.10. Available at http://sbmorphometrics.org/soft-dataacq.html(accessed 7. IX.2022). Google Scholar

    175.

    Rohlf F.J. 2015. The tps series of software. Hystrix 26: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix-26.1-11264 Google Scholar

    176.

    Rohlf F.J., Marcus L.F. 1993. A revolution in morphometrics. Tree 8: 129–132. Google Scholar

    177.

    Rohlf F.J., Slice D. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology 39: 40–59. Google Scholar

    178.

    Roig-Alsina A. 1993. The evolution of the apoid endophallus, its phylogenetic implications, and functional significance of the genital capsule (Hymenoptera, Apoidea). Bollettino di Zoologia 60: 169–183. Google Scholar

    179.

    Ross E.S. 2009. Lifelong safari: The story of a 93-year-old peripatetic insect hunter. Annual Review of Entomology 54(1): 1–16. Google Scholar

    180.

    San Martin P.R. 1969. Estudio sobre la compleja estructura del esqueleto esclerificado del organo paraxial del género Brachistosternus (Bothriuridae, Scorpionida). Boletin de la Sociedad de Biologia de Concepcion 41: 13–30. Google Scholar

    181.

    Santibáñez-López C.E., Francke O.F. 2013. Redescription of Diplocentrus zacatecanus (Scorpiones: Diplocentridae) and limitations of the hemispermatophore as a diagnostic trait for the genus Diplocentrus. Journal of Arachnology 41: 1–10. Google Scholar

    182.

    Shapiro A.M., Porter A.H. 1989. The lock-and-key hypothesis: Evolutionary and biosystematic interpretation of insect genitalia. Annual Review of Entomology 34: 231–45. Google Scholar

    183.

    Shapiro S.S., Wilk M.B. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52(3-4): 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 Google Scholar

    184.

    Shaverdo H.V., Balke M. 2014. Exocelina kinibeli sp. n. from Papua New Guinea, a new species of the E. ullrichi-group (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Koleopterologische Rundschau 84: 31–40. Google Scholar

    185.

    Shaverdo H.V., Balke M. 2019. A new species of the Exocelina ekari group and new faunistic data on 12 species of Exocelina Broun, 1886 from New Guinea (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Koleopterologische Rundschau 89: 1–10. Google Scholar

    186.

    Shaverdo H., Surbakti S., Hendrich L., Balke M. 2012. Introduction of the Exocelina ekari-group with descriptions of 22 new species from New Guinea (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Copelatinae) Zookeys 250: 1–76. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.250.3715 Google Scholar

    187.

    Shaverdo H.V., Hendrich L., Balke M. 2013. Exocelina baliem sp. n., the only known pond species of New Guinea Exocelina Broun, 1886 (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Copelatinae). ZooKeys 304: 83–99. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.304.4852 Google Scholar

    188.

    Shaverdo H., Sagata K., Panjaitan R., Menufandu H., Balke M. 2014. Description of 23 new species of the Exocelina ekarigroup from New Guinea, with a key to all representatives of the group (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Copelatinae). Zookeys 468: 1–83. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.468.8506 Google Scholar

    189.

    Shaverdo H., Panjaitan R., Balke M. 2016a. A new, widely distributed species of the Exocelina ekari-group from West Papua (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Copelatinae). ZooKeys 554: 69–85. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.554.6065 Google Scholar

    190.

    Shaverdo H., Sagata K., Balke M. 2016b. Taxonomic revision of New Guinea diving beetles of the Exocelina danae group, with the description of ten new species (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Copelatinae). Zookeys 619: 45–102. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.619.9951 Google Scholar

    191.

    Shaverdo H., Sagata K., Balke M. 2016c. Description of two new species of the Exocelina broschii-group from Papua New Guinea, with revision and key to all representatives of this species group (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Copelatinae). ZooKeys 577: 125–148. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.577.7254 Google Scholar

    192.

    Shaverdo H., Wild M., Sumoked B., Balke M. 2017. Six new species of the genus Exocelina Broun, 1886 from Wano Land, New Guinea (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Copelatinae). ZooKeys 665: 93–120. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.665.11792 Google Scholar

    193.

    Shaverdo H., Sagata K., Balke M. 2018. Introduction of the Exocelina casuarina-group, with a key to its representatives and descriptions of 19 new species from New Guinea (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Copelatinae). ZooKeys 803: 7–70. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.803.28903 Google Scholar

    194.

    Shaverdo H., Surbakti S., Warikar E.L., Sagata K., Balke M. 2019. Nine new species groups, 15 new species, and one new subspecies of New Guinea diving beetles of the genus Exocelina Broun, 1886 (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Copelatinae). Zookeys 878: 73–143. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.878.37403 Google Scholar

    195.

    Shaverdo H., Surbakti S., Sumoked B., Balke M. 2020. Two new species of the Exocelina ekari group from New Guinea with strongly modified male antennae (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Copelatinae). ZooKeys 960: 63–78. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.960.55007 Google Scholar

    196.

    Simmons L.W. 2001. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton University Press , Princeton, New Jersey , 456 pp. Google Scholar

    197.

    Simmons L.W. 2014. Sexual selection and genital evolution. Austral Entomology 53: 1–17. Google Scholar

    198.

    Simon E. 1880. Etudes Arachnologiques. 12° mémoire. XVIII. Descriptions de genres et espèces de l'ordre des Scorpions. Annales de la Société entomologique de France (série 5) 10: 377–398. Google Scholar

    199.

    Sissom W.D., González-Santillán E.G. 2004. A new species and new records for the Vaejovis nitidulus group, with a key to the Mexican species (Scorpiones, Vaejovidae). Texas Memorial Monographs, Speleological Monographs 6: 1–8. Google Scholar

    200.

    Sissom W.D., Hendrixson B.E. 2005. A new species of Vaejovis (Scorpiones: Vaejovidae) from Coahuila and Nuevo Leon, and a key to the vaejovid species from northeastern and north-central Mexico. Zootaxa 29: 33–43. Google Scholar

    201.

    Sissom W.D., Hughes G.B., Bryson R.W., Prendini L. 2012. The vorhiesi group of Vaejovis C.L. Koch, 1836 (Scorpiones: Vaejovidae) in Arizona, with description of a new species from the Hualapai Mountains. American Museum Novitates 3742: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1206/3742.2 Google Scholar

    202.

    Sissom W.D., Graham M.R., Donaldson T.G., Bryson Jr. R.W. 2016. Two new Vaejovis C.L. Koch 1836 from highlands of the Sierra Madre Occidental, Durango, Mexico (Scorpiones, Vaejovidae). Insecta Mundi 477: 1–14. Google Scholar

    203.

    Slapcinsky J. 2005. Six new species of Paryphantopsis (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Charopidae) from the Papuan Peninsula of New Guinea. The Nautilus 119(1): 27–42. Google Scholar

    204.

    Slapcinsky J. 2006. Paryphantopsis (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Charopidae) from the Louisiade Archipelago of New Guinea. The Nautilus 120(4): 119–130. Google Scholar

    205.

    Slapcinsky J. 2009. A new species of Paryphantopsis (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Charopidae) from Crater Mountain, Simbu (Chimbu) Province, Papua New Guinea. The Nautilus 123(2): 53–58. Google Scholar

    206.

    Slapcinsky J., Lasley R. 2007. Three new species of Paryphantopsis (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Charopidae) from the Nakanai Mountains, New Britain, Papua New Guinea. The Nautilus 121(4): 182–190. Google Scholar

    207.

    Soleglad M.E., Sissom W.D. 2001. Phylogeny of the family Euscorpiidae Laurie, 1896: a major revision (pp. 25–111). In : Fet V., Selden P.A. (Eds). In memoriam Gary A. Polis. British Arachnological Society , Burnham Beeches, UK , 404 pp. Google Scholar

    208.

    Sota T., Kubota K. 1998. Genital lock-and-key as a selective agent against hybridization. Evolution 52(5): 1507–1513. Google Scholar

    209.

    Stahnke H.L. 1970. Scorpion nomenclature and mensuration. Entomological News 81: 297–316. Google Scholar

    210.

    Stahnke H.L. 1974. Revision and keys to the higher categories of Vejovidae (Scorpionida). Journal of Arachnology 1(2): 107–141. Google Scholar

    211.

    Stockwell S.A. 1989. Revision of the phylogeny and higher classification of scorpions (Chelicerata). Unpublished Ph. D. thesis, University of California , Berkeley , 413 pp. Google Scholar

    212.

    Strickland J.L., Carter S., Kraus F., Parkinson C.L. 2016. Snake evolution in Melanesia: origin of the Hydrophiinae (Serpentes, Elapidae), and the evolutionary history of the enigmatic New Guinean elapid Toxicocalamus. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 178(3): 663–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12423 Google Scholar

    213.

    Sundevall C.J. 1833. Conspectus arachnidum. Sveno Hardin et Erico T. Hammergren , Vermlandis, London-Göteborg , 39 pp. Google Scholar

    214.

    Takashima H. 1945. Scorpions of Eastern Asia. Acta arachnologica 9(3-4): 68–106. Google Scholar

    215.

    Tallowin O.J.S., Tamar K., Meiri S., Allison A., Kraus F., Richards S.J., Oliver P.M. 2018. Early insularity and subsequent mountain uplift were complementary drivers of diversification in a Melanesian lizard radiation (Gekkonidae: Cyrtodactylus). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 125: 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2018.03.020 Google Scholar

    216.

    Tallowin O.J.S., Meiri S., Donnellan S.C., Richards S.J., Austin C.C., Oliver P.M. 2020. The other side of the Sahulian coin: Biogeography and evolution of Melanesian forest dragons (Agamidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 129(1): 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blz125 Google Scholar

    217.

    Telnov D. 2011. Taxonomische Revision der Gattung Macratria Newman, 1838 (Coleoptera: Anthicidae: Macratriinae) aus Wallacea, Neuguinea und den Salomonen (pp. 97–286). In : Telnov D. (Ed.). Biodiversity, biogeography and nature conservation in Wallacea and New Guinea, volume 1. Entomological Society of Latvia , Riga , 434 pp. Google Scholar

    218.

    Thiele J. 1928. Mollusken vom Bismark-Archipel, von Neu-Guinea und Nachbar-Inseln. Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abteilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere 55: 119–146. Google Scholar

    219.

    Thilenius G. 1927. Ergebnisse der Südsee-Expedition 1908-1910. I. Allgemeines. Verlag L. Friederichsen & Co , Hamburg , 489 pp. Google Scholar

    220.

    Thompson C. 2011. Final Frontier: Newly discovered species of New Guinea (1998-2008). WWF report 2011. WWF Western Melanesia Programme Office , 55 pp. Google Scholar

    221.

    Thorell T. 1876. On the classification of scorpions. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 4(17): 1–15. Google Scholar

    222.

    Tumbrinck J., Skejo J. 2017. Taxonomic and biogeographic revision of the New Guinean genus Ophiotettix Walker, 1871 (Tetrigidae: Metrodorinae: Ophiotettigini trib. nov.), with the descriptions of 33 new species (pp. 104–124). In : Telnov D. (Ed.). Biodiversity, biogeography and nature conservation in Wallacea and New Guinea, volume 3. Entomological Society of Latvia , Riga , 658 pp. Google Scholar

    223.

    Toussaint E.F.A., Hall R., Monaghan M.T., Sagata K., Ibalim S., Shaverdo H.V., Vogler A.P., Pons J., Balke M. 2014. The towering orogeny of New Guinea as a trigger for arthropod megadiversity. Nature Communications 5: article4001. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5001 Google Scholar

    224.

    Unmack P.J., Allen G.R., Johnson J.B. 2013. Phylogeny and biogeography of rainbowfishes (Melanotaeniidae) from Australia and New Guinea. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 67: 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.12.019 Google Scholar

    225.

    Vachon M. 1952. Etude sur les scorpions. Institut Pasteur d'Algérie , Algiers , 482 pp. Google Scholar

    226.

    Vachon M. 1956. Sur des nouveaux caractères familiaux et génériques chez les scorpions (pp. 471–474). In : Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Zoology, Copenhagen, 5-12 August 1953. Danish Science Press , Copenhagen , 567 pp. Google Scholar

    227.

    Vachon M. 1963. De l'utilité, en systématique, d'une nomenclature des dents des chélicères chez les scorpions. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (série 2) 35: 161–166. Google Scholar

    228.

    Vachon M. 1974. Etude des caractères utilisés pour classer les familles et les genres de scorpions (Arachnides). 1. La trichobothriotaxie chez les scorpions. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (série 3) 140: 857–958. Google Scholar

    229.

    Van Dam M.H., Laufa R., Riedel A. 2016. Four new species of Trigonopterus Fauvel from the island of New Britain (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). ZooKeys 582: 129–141. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.582.7709 Google Scholar

    230.

    Van Deusen H.M. 1964. 7th Archbold expedition summary. Unpublished archive of the American Museum of Natural History , New YorkGoogle Scholar

    231.

    Van Deusen H.M. 1971. Obituary: Leonard John Brass. North Queensland Naturalist 39(156): 2–3. Google Scholar

    232.

    Van Ufford A.Q., Cloos M. 2005. Cenozoic tectonics of New Guinea. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 89: 119–140. Google Scholar

    233.

    Von den Steinen U. 2010. Expeditionsreisen am Amazonas: Der Ethnologe Karl von den Steinen (1855-1929). Böhlau Verlag , Wien , 166 pp. Google Scholar

    234.

    Walker F. 1871. Catalogue of Dermaptera Saltatoria, part V (pp. 811–850). In : British Museum (Ed.). Catalogue of the specimens of Dermaptera Saltatoria in the collection of the British Museum. E. Newman , London , 116 pp. Google Scholar

    235.

    Wichmann A. 1912. Nova Guinea, résultats de l'expédition scientifique néerlandaise à la Nouvelle Guinée en 1903 sous les auspices de Arthur Wichmann. Volume II. 2ème partie. E. J. Brill , Leiden , 1026 pp. Google Scholar

    236.

    Williams S.C. 1970. A systematic revision of the giant hairy scorpion genus Hadrurus. Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences 87: 1–62. Google Scholar

    237.

    Williams S.C., Savary W.E. 1991. Uroctonites, a new genus of scorpion from Western North America (Scorpiones: Vaejovidae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist 67(4): 272–287. Google Scholar

    238.

    Yassin A., Orgogozo V. 2013. Coevolution between male and female genitalia in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. PLoS ONE 8(2): e57158. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057158 Google Scholar

    239.

    Zhang J.-X., Maddison W.P. 2012. New euophryine jumping spiders from Papua New Guinea (Araneae: Salticidae: Euophryinae). Zootaxa 3491: 1–74. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3491.1.1 Google Scholar

    240.

    Zweifel R.G., Cogger H.G., Richards S.J. 2005. Systematics of microhylid frogs, genus Oreophryne, living at high elevations in New Guinea. American Museum Novitates 3495: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0082(2005)495[0001:somfgo]2.0.co;2 Google Scholar
    Lionel Monod, Christina Lehmann-Graber, Christopher C. Austin, Bulisa Iova, and Lorenzo Prendini "Atlas of Australasian hormurid scorpions. I. The genus Hormurus Thorell, 1876 in Papua New Guinea. Exceptional morphological diversity in male and female copulatory structures suggests genital coevolution," Revue suisse de Zoologie 130(suppl), 1-243, (13 November 2023). https://doi.org/10.35929/RSZ.0111
    Accepted: 30 June 2023; Published: 13 November 2023
    KEYWORDS
    Endemism
    genital coevolution
    geometric morphometrics
    hemispermatophore
    Melanesia
    multivariate morphometrics
    structural lock-and-key mechanism
    Back to Top