Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2013 Hoya corymbosa (Apocynaceae, Asclepiadoideae), A New Unusual Species from Sabah, Borneo, and Its Systematic Position Based on Phylogenetic Analysis
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A new species, Hoya corymbosa, from Sabah (Borneo), is described and illustrated. It is a horizontally growing epiphytic shrub with diminutive flowers. Its minute staminal corona lobes lacking revolute outer margins and broad, flat caudicles of the pollinarium (resembling those of Dischidia) are quite peculiar within the genus, which is otherwise characterized by corona lobes with revolute margins and generally round to oval caudicles. Its position in Hoya has been confirmed by phylogenetic analysis based on nuclear ribosomal ITS region, the matK gene and psbA-trnH intergenic spacer.

Hoya R. Br. is a large genus with more than 500 published species names (The International Plant Name Index, 2013), and an estimated 200–300 species (Kleijn and van Donkelaar 2001). It includes mostly climbing epiphytes found in inaccessible places high in the canopy in tropical and subtropical forests of mainland Asia, Malesia, Melanesia, and Australia (Forster et al. 1998). Only a few species are pendulous, such as Hoya linearis Wall. ex D. Don, or form epiphytic shrubs, such as Hoya medinillifolia Rodda & Simonsson (Rodda and Simonsson 2011).

The flowers of Hoya are held by slender terete pedicels borne on peduncles that can bear flowers multiple times and often last several years (Rintz 1978). They form concave, flat, or convex inflorescences and are characterized by a corolla with five lobes, ranging from almost entirely fused, forming a campanulate flower, to nearly free, spreading, reflexed or revolute, and by a staminal corona (Cs sensu Liede and Kunze 1993) with lobes often horizontally spreading, including an inner process appressed to the anthers, and a variable outer process with revolute lateral margins (see figures in Kunze and Wanntorp 2008). The seeds are comose, spindle-shaped, and lack differentiated margins. The pollinaria are formed by two pollinia with a conspicuous, pellucid, germination zone (Omlor 1996) connected to a pigmented retinaculum by caudicles, generally round or oval, rarely ribbon-shaped, as observed in species of Hoya section Eriostemma Schltr.

Recent molecular studies based on atpB-rbcL spacer, ITS and trnL regions (Wanntorp et al. 2006a, b), the matK gene and psbA-trnH intergenic spacer (Wanntorp et al. 2011) have led to a recircumscription of the genus and the merger of genera previously considered as belonging elsewhere in Marsdenieae (Wanntorp and Forster 2007; Wanntorp et al. 2011; Wanntorp and Meve 2011) reducing the genera belonging to Marsdenieae from 29 (Endress and Bruyns 2000) to 25. The inclusion of these taxa in Hoya introduced novel characters to the genus, such as small urceolate corollas (in Hoya manipurensis Deb), revolute basal skirt in the corona lobe and broadly urceolate corolla (Hoya inflata (P. I. Forst., Liddle & I. M. Liddle) L. Wanntorp & P. I. Forst. (Forster et al. 1997; Wanntorp and Forster 2007)), fleshy coronas with valvate lobes and clavate pollinia without pellucid margins, small and narrow retinacula and long ribbon-shaped caudicles (Hoya mariae (Schltr.) L. Wanntorp & Meve and Hoya omlorii (Livsh. & Meve) L. Wanntorp & Meve (Wanntorp and Meve 2011)). New potential synapomorphies for Hoya have also been identified: pollinia with pellucid margins, anther skirts, modified guide rails, and secondary nectaries (Wanntorp and Kunze 2009).

As part of ongoing work on the systematics of Hoya, a new species was identified among living collections cultivated at Kipandi Butterfly Farm, Sabah, Malaysia. Based on morphological characters, the new species described below is atypical within the genus because it exhibits (1) horizontal or pendulous shrubby habit, (2) anvil-shaped corona lobes lacking revolute outer margins and (3) broad, flat caudicles of the pollinarium. In light of the atypical morphology, the objective of this study was to verify the generic placement of the new species in the genus Hoya by a molecular phylogenetic analysis and subsequently to describe it formally.

Materials and Methods

Morphological Observation—This study is based on the comparison of specimens of Marsdenieae from BM, BRUN, FI, K, KEP, L, LAE, P, SAN, SAR, SNP, and SING herbaria and from living specimens cultivated in Kipandi Butterfly Farm, Sabah, Malaysia. Observation of the specimens was carried out with the aid of a light microscope. Pollinaria were extracted and mounted on glass slides prior to microscopic observation.

Phylogenetic Analysis—To confirm the generic position of the new species, we performed a phylogenetic analysis of Hoya based on nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS), matK gene, and psbA-trnH intergenic spacer DNA sequences. The choice of markers was dictated by the availability of reference sequences in GenBank published as part of recent investigations on Hoya (Wanntorp et al. 2011). ITS, matK, and psbA- trnH sequences are available for most Hoya taxa, while sequences of atpB- rbcL spacer and trnL regions are generally incomplete or not available.

DNA extraction and sequencing was performed as described in Wanntorp et al. (2011) from one accession of Hoya corymbosa Rodda & Simonsson (Voucher: Rodda MR10-003, SING) and of two further shrubby species, Hoya lockii V. T. Pham & Aver. (Voucher: Rodda M. Hort2010.X, TO) and Hoya ignorata T. B. Tran et al. (Tran et al. 2011) (Voucher: Simonsson & Somadee NS10-007, SING). The PCR products were purified using Wizard® PCR and gel clean-up system (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin), according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Sequencing was performed by AITBiotech Pte Ltd, Singapore, and all newly obtained sequences were deposited in GenBank (Appendix 1). For the phylogenetic analysis, our sequences were aligned with 67 reference taxa, including 62 species of Hoya, two species of Dischidia R. Br. (ingroup), and three species of Marsdenia R.Br. (outgroup taxa) selected among those published in recent phylogenetic studies on Hoya (Wanntorp et al. 2011) for which ITS, matK, and psbA-trnH sequences were available. These may not fully represent the morphological and geographical complexity of the genus, which still requires further investigation. The specimen of Hoya wallichii (Wight) C. M. Burton included in Wanntorp et al. (2011) was re-identified as Hoya danumensis Rodda & Nyhuus. All sequences used are listed in Appendix 1.

Single alignments for each data set of ITS, matK, and psbA-trnH sequences were generated using CLUSTALX 2.0 (Larkin et al. 2007) with default conditions for gap openings and gap extension penalties. Best-fit model estimation was performed by jModeltest (Posada 2008). The bestfit substitution models adopted were GTR + G, HKY + G, GTR + G for the ITS, matK and psbA-trnH analysis, respectively. A combined molecular phylogenetic analysis was performed using the Bayesian Inference (BI) approach. Congruence of the three datasets was verified by computation of Congruency Index lcong (de Vienne et al. 2007). Trees based on the single regions are available upon request. Bayesian Inference of phylog- eny using Monte Carlo Markov Chains (MCMC) was carried out with MrBayes 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001). Four incrementally heated simultaneous MCMC were run over 10,000,000 generations, under model assumptions. Trees were sampled every 1,000 generations resulting in an overall sampling of 10,001 trees, with the first 2,500 trees discarded as “burn-in” (25%). For the remaining trees, a majority rule consensus tree showing all compatible partitions was computed to obtain estimates for Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP). Branch lengths were estimated as mean values over the sampled trees. Only BPP values over 0.8 are reported in the resulting tree. Bayesian analysis was repeated three times, always using random starting trees and values for model parameters to test independence of the results from revisiting prior topologies during chain growth (Huelsenbeck et al. 2002).

Results

The examination of herbarium materials allowed us to exclude that the new taxon was already described either in Hoya or in any other genus within Marsdenieae. Similarities were recognized only with H. ignorata (see Notes below), which as a result was included in the phylogenetic analysis.

Trees reconstructed from single gene analyses (ITS, matK, and psbA-trnH) were poorly resolved (data not shown, available on request). The topology of the combined tree (Fig. 1) is in accordance with recent phylogenetic investigations of the genus (Wanntorp et al. 2011) and all previously recognized groups (clades 1 –7 of Fig. 3 in Wanntorp et al. 2011) are maintained.

Three further clades can be observed. Clade 5 includes species from New Guinea and the Pacific Islands, which was already observed in Wanntorp et al. (2006a), but not in Wanntorp et al. (2011) because in the latter case two species, Hoya erythrostemma Kerr from Thailand and Peninsular Malaysia, and Hoya globulosa Hook. f. from the Himalayan region and Indochina were nested within the clade. Clade 9 includes two taxa from the Himalayan/Indian region. Hoya ignorata and H. corymbosa form clade 8 that belongs to a polytomy containing clade 6, ‘Acanthostemma clade’, clade 7, containing a further three species from the Himalayan/ Indian region, clade 9, and the poorly supported clade 10, ‘core Hoya’. Another shrubby species, H. lockii, instead, is part of clade 1, ‘Hoya multiflora Blume clade’, which includes other shrubby species.

Discussion

Although initial examination of the new species did not allow its straightforward assignment to Hoya, the molecular phylogeny allowed us to verify that it belongs to the genus, and confirm its sister relationship to H. ignorata. The following description is based on living materials in cultivation at Kipandi Butterfly Farm, Sabah, Malaysia, and on the examined specimens from SAN and SING herbaria.

Taxonomic Treatment

  • Hoya corymbosa Rodda & Simonsson, sp. nov—TYPE: MALAYSIA. Sabah: Cultivated in Kipandi Butterfly Farm, originally collected in Malaysia, Sabah, Sipitang District, Mt. Rimau area, lower montane forest being logged at the moment of collection, ca. 1,600 m, 18 June 2009, Gokusing et al. Al1803/2009 (holotype: SAN!).

    Similar to H. ignorata because both taxa are epiphytic shrubs bearing positively geotropic inflorescences of small flowers (< 2.8 mm diam.) with reflexed corollas. The two species can be distinguished because H. ignorata flowers lack corona lobes and the pollinia are pendulous, connected to the retinaculum by long, narrow, ribbon-shaped caudicles, while H. corymbosa has anvil-shaped corona lobes and erect pollinia, connected to the retinaculum by broader caudicles (15 µm vs. 150 µm).

    Horizontal or pendulous epiphytic shrub with white latex in vegetative parts. All trichomes unicellular eglandular. Leafy stems cylindrical, 2–2.5 mm in diam., dark green, with sparse erect or spreading trichomes; older stems leafless, up to 5 mm in diam., brown, glabrous with peeling bark; internodes 1.5–3 cm long. Leaves held horizontally; petiole terete, 1.5–2 × ca. 1.2 mm in diam., green, with sparse spreading trichomes; lamina ovate-elliptic, 0.7–2 × 2–4 cm, thick, fleshy, dark green on adaxial surface with purple margin, light green on abaxial surface, sparsely pubescent on the abaxial surface of young leaves only, adaxial side and old leaves glabrous, apex cuspidate (caudate), base round to attenuate, margin entire, slightly revolute with a purple edge; venation pinnate, midrib depressed on adaxial surface, secondary veins 2–4 on each side, not evident in living and dry material grown in high light, but clearly visible on living material cultivated in low light, anastomosing near the leaf margin, branching from the midrib at 30–60°; colleters 2–4 at the base of the lamina, triangular, brown. Inflorescences one per node, extra-axillary, positively geotropic, corymbiform, flat to convex, consisting of 7–10 flowers; peduncle terete, 1.5–3 mm × ca. 1.2 mm, old ones with scars from previous flowerings, new peduncles sparsely covered by antrorse trichomes (old peduncles glabrous), presenting ca. 10 apical bracts, round, ca. 0.5× 0.4 mm, light green or purple, with sparse antrorse unicellular trichomes, margin ciliate; pedicels terete, 3–4× ca. 0.6 mm in diam., producing a bulbous expansion beneath the calyx lobes ca. 1 mm in diam., light green-yellow, papillate. Flower buds globular, light yellow to green. Flowers unscented (lasting about one week in cultivation). Calyx ca. 2 mm in diam., calyx lobes ovate-orbicular, ca. 0.7 × 0.7 mm, apex rounded, glabrous adaxially, papillose abaxially, margin ciliate; colleters 1 –2 in each sepal sinus, triangular, ca. 50 µm long. Corolla reflexed, 2.3–2.7 mm diam. (ca. 7 mm when flattened), yellow flushed pink; lobes ovate-lanceolate, 2.3–2.7 × 1.3–1.5 mm, basally fused for ca. 1.5 mm, adaxially thickly covered with unicellular retrorse trichomes, abaxially glabrous, margins entire, apex acuminate, revolute. Staminal corona (Cs), ca. 2 mm high, 2.2 mm in diam., fleshy, yellow; corona lobes anvil-shaped, free portion 0.3 × 0.5 mm, inner process slightly erect, outer process apically enlarged, truncate when observed from above, deeply grooved between inner and outer lobe, basally fused with the filament tube, lacking basal revolute margins. Style-head convex, covered by membranaceous, triangular anther appendages. Guide rails abruptly terminating ca. 350 µm below retinaculum forming a prominent membranaceous appendage. Pollinarium ca. 750 × 750 µm, with two nearly round erect pollinia with evident pellucid margin 300 µm across, retinaculum small (compared to the size of the pollinarium), ca. 170 × 100 µm, caudicles attached at the base of retinaculum, ca. 400 × 150 µm, flat. Ovary bi-carpellate, triangular, apically constricted, rounded, ca. 0.8 mm long; each carpel ca. 0.5 mm wide at base, light green, glabrous. Fruits and seeds unknown. Figures 2, 3.

  • Representative Specimens Examined—ITALY. Turin, cultivated in Turin Botanic Gardens, ex hort., 7 March 2011, Rodda MR10-003 (SING).

  • MALAYSIA. Sabah: cultivated in Mr Ben Chai Garden, 3 Mar 2009, Lamb AL1726/2009 (SAN).

  • Etymology—The species name refers to the corymbiform inflorescence.

  • Distribution and Ecology—The only documented locality of H. corymbosa is in Sabah, Sipitang district, near Mt. Rimau (Gokusing et al. A11803/2009). The plant was also collected in a second, undocumented locality in Sabah (Lamb A11726/2009). The only information on the habitat of H. corymbosa is derived from the type locality. The plant is epiphytic and roots in holes in the bark of the host trees. It was collected at 1,600 m altitude, in primary lower montane forest, which was being logged at the time of collection. It is successfully cultivated at the Kipandi Butterfly Farm, Kampung Kipandi, Moyog, Sabah, where we observed that most flowers were lacking pollinaria (Fig. 2D). This suggests that potential pollinators may be present also in this locality (although they have not been observed), and, so far, no fruits have been produced.

  • Conservation StatusNo extant wild population of H. corymbosa is known. The type locality was being logged when the plant was collected, and the second locality in Sabah was not documented. It is currently conserved ex situ at the Kipandi Butterfly Farm. For these reasons the conservation status of this species is critically endangered (IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee 2011).

  • NotesHoya corymbosa is peculiar within the genus in being an epiphytic shrub while most other species of Hoya are climbers. Shrubby species of Hoya have flowers broader than 0.5 cm across, the only exception is its sister taxon H. ignorata, a species distributed from Vietnam to Borneo (including Sabah). Hoya corymbosa and H. ignorata can be superficially confused because they are both epiphytic shrubs and bear diminutive yellowish flowers. They can be distinguished as H. corymbosa has anvil-shaped corona lobes (lacking revolute outer margins), erect pollinia with flat, broad caudicles (resembling those of Dischidia spp.), while H. ignorata flowers lack corona lobes, and the pollinaria are pendulous with long, thin caudicles.

Fig.1.

Bayesian phylogram obtained from the combined psbA-trnH intergenic spacer, matK gene and ITS ribosomal region data set. Voucher information and GenBank accession numbers can be found in Appendix 1. Support values (> 0.80) for major clades resulting from Bayesian BPP analyses are indicated above the branches. Clade numbers identified in Wanntorp et al. (2011) are indicated after the slash: ‘1/2’Hoya multiflora clade; ‘2/1’Hoya sect. Eriostemma clade; ‘3/7’Dischidia clade; ‘4/6’, ‘7/5’ and ‘9’Himalayan/Indian clades; ‘5’Australia/New Guinea clade (clade 2 in Wanntorp et al. 2006a); ‘6/4’sect. Acanthostemma clade; ‘8’Hoya corymbosa clade; ‘10/3’Core Hoya.

f01_1125.jpg

Fig. 2.

Hoya corymbosa: A. Corona from below. B. Corona from above. C, D. Calyx. E. Pollinarium. Aa = anther appendage, Ca = caudicle, Cl = calyx lobe, Co = corona lobe, G = guide rail, O = ovary, P = pollinium, Pe = pedicel, R = retinaculum (all by M. Rodda from Gokusing et al. AH803/2009 (SAN)).

f02_1125.jpg

Fig. 3.

Hoya corymbosa: A, B. Flowering specimen. C. Inflorescence from below: peduncle with apical bracts, pedicels and revolute tips of the corolla lobes. D. Inflorescence from the side. Most anthers lack pollinaria on this specimen cultivated in Kipandi Butterfly Farm, Sabah. E, F. Inflorescences on specimens cultivated in Turin. Here the pollinaria have not been dislodged (all pictures M. Rodda from Rodda MR10-003 prior to pressing (C, E, F), or from living plant at Kipandi Butterfly Farm, Sabah (A, B, D)).

f03_1125.jpg

Key To Bornean Hoya Species with a Shrubby Habit

1. Flower diameter >0.5 cm 2

2. Corona lobe processes elongated with acuminate tips Hoya multiflora.

2.Corona lobe processes otherwise 4

4. Corona lobes heart-shaped Hoya medinillifolia

4. Corona lobes otherwise 5

5. Corona lobes laterally compressed, corolla with long sericeous trichomes Hoya lasiantha

5. Corona lobes ovate, corolla finely puberulous Hoya cumingiana

1. Flower diameter < 0.5 cm 3

3.Corona lobes absent Hoya ignorata

3. Corona lobes anvil-shaped Hoya corymbosa

Acknowledgments.

This study is part of an ongoing research project on the systematics of Hoya. This research received support from the National Parks Board (Singapore) and the SYNTHESYS Project  http://www.synthesys.info/ which is financed by European Community Research Infrastructure Action under the FP7 Integrating Activities Programme, grants GB-TAF-5657, NL-TAF-676 and DE-TAF-675 to M.R. and from Helge Ax:son Johnsons Stiftelse to N.S.J. We would like to thank the curators of the herbaria mentioned in the text for allowing access and/or for providing high quality images of herbarium specimens. We are grateful to Alexandre Gavrus, Anthony Lamb and Torill Nyhuus for the valuable discussion on the new taxon, Linus Gokusing for successfully growing the plant at Kipandi Butterfly Farm (Sabah, Malaysia), Paola Bonfante, and Maria Teresa Della Beffa for their support in Hortus Botanicus of Turin (Italy), Mary Endress and one anonymous reviewer for their valuable comments on the manuscript.

Literature Cited

1.

M. E. Endress and P. V. Bruyns . 2000. A Revised Classification of the Apocynaceae s.l. Botanical Review 66:1–56. Google Scholar

2.

P. I. Forster , D. J. Liddle , and I. M. Liddle . 1997. Madangia inflata (Asclepiadaceae: Marsdenieae), a new genus and species from Papua New Guinea. Austrobaileya 5: 53–57. Google Scholar

3.

P. I. Forster , D. J. Liddle , and I. M. Liddle . 1998. Diversity in the genus Hoya (Asclepiadaceae-Marsdenieae). Aloe 35: 44–48. Google Scholar

4.

J. P. Huelsenbeck and F. Ronquist . 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755. Google Scholar

5.

J. P. Huelsenbeck , B. Larget , R. E. Miller , and F. Ronquist . 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Systematic Biology 51: 673–688. Google Scholar

6.

The International Plant Name Index. 2013. Published on the Internet  http://www.ipni.org [accessed 21 January 2013]. Google Scholar

7.

IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. 2011. Guidelines for using the IUCN red list categories and criteria. Version 9.0. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. Downloadable from  http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdfGoogle Scholar

8.

D. Kleijn and R. van Donkelaar . 2001. Notes on the taxonomy and ecology of the genus Hoya (Asclepiadaceae) in Central Sulawesi. Blumea 46: 457–483. Google Scholar

9.

H. Kunze and L. Wanntorp . 2008. The gynostegium of Hoya spartioides (Apocynaceae Asclepiadoideae): a striking case of incongruence between molecular and phenotypic evolution. Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 8: 346–357. Google Scholar

10.

M. A. Larkin , G. Blackshields , N. P. Brown , R. Chenna , P. A. McGettigan , H. McWilliam , F. Valentin , I. M. Wallace , A. Wilm , R. Lopez , J. D. Thompson , T. J. Gibson , and D. G. Higgins . 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947–2948. Google Scholar

11.

S. Liede and H. Kunze . 1993. A descriptive system for corona analysis in the Asclepiadaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 185: 99–284.  Google Scholar

12.

R. Omlor 1996. Notes on Marsdenieae (Asclepiadaceae): A new, unusual species of Hoya from Northern Borneo. Novon 6: 288 –294. Google Scholar

13.

D. Posada 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 1253–1256. Google Scholar

14.

R. E. Rintz 1978. The Peninsular Malaysian species of Hoya (Asclepiadaceae). Malayan Nature Journal 30: 467–522. Google Scholar

15.

M. Rodda and N. Simonsson . 2011. Hoya medinillifolia (Apocynaceae, Asclepiadoideae), a new species from lowland forests of Sarawak, Borneo. Webbia 66:149–154. Google Scholar

16.

T. B. Tran , J. H. Kim , D. K. Kim , J. Lee , B. T. Ha , N. Simonsson Juhonewe , and M. Rodda . 2011. Hoya ignorata (Apocynaceae, Asclepiadoideae) an overlooked species widely distributed across southeast Asia. Novon 21:508–514. Google Scholar

17.

D. M. de Vienne , T. Giraud , and O. C. Martin . 2007. A congruence index for testing topological similarity between trees. Bioinformatics 23:3119–3124.  Google Scholar

18.

L. Wanntorp , A. Kocyan , and S. S. Renner . 2006a. Wax plants disentangled: a phylogeny of Hoya (Marsdenieae, Apocynaceae) inferred from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39: 722–733. Google Scholar

19.

L. Wanntorp , A. Kocyan , R. van Donkelaar , and S. S. Renner . 2006b. Towards a monophyletic Hoya (Marsdenieae, Apocynaceae): inferences from the chloroplast trnL region and the rbcL-atpB spacer. Systematic Botany 31: 586–596. Google Scholar

20.

L. Wanntorp and P. I. Forster . 2007. Phylogenetic relationships between Hoya and the monotypic genera Madangia, Absolmsia and Micholitzia (Apocynaceae, Marsdenieae): insights from flower morphology. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 94: 36–55. Google Scholar

21.

L. Wanntorp and H. Kunze . 2009. Identifying synapomorphies in the flowers of Hoya and Dischidia — towards phylogenetic understanding. International Journal of Plant Sciences 170: 331–342. Google Scholar

22.

L. Wanntorp , K. Gotthardt , and A. N. Muellner . 2011. Revisiting the wax plants (Hoya, Marsdenieae, Apocynaceae): phylogenetic tree using the matK gene and psbA-trnH intergenic spacer. Taxon 60: 4–14.  Google Scholar

23.

L. Wanntorp and U. Meve . 2011. New combinations in Hoya for the species of Clemensiella (Marsdenieae, Apocynaceae). Willdenowia 41: 97–99. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix 1.

Taxa included in the present study are presented in the following order: species: GenBank accession numbers for sequences of the psbA-trnH region, matK, and ITS, respectively; collection locality, voucher (herbarium acronyms follow Index Herbariorum).

eA01_1125.gif
eA02_1125.gif
eA03_1125.gif
Michele Rodda, Nadhanielle Simonsson Juhonewe, and Enrico Ercole "Hoya corymbosa (Apocynaceae, Asclepiadoideae), A New Unusual Species from Sabah, Borneo, and Its Systematic Position Based on Phylogenetic Analysis," Systematic Botany 38(4), 1125-1131, (1 December 2013). https://doi.org/10.1600/036364413X674733
Published: 1 December 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top