How to translate text using browser tools
1 August 2010 Does Garbage in the Diet Improve Reproductive Output of Glaucous Gulls?
Emily L. Weiser, Abby N. Powell
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Anthropogenic subsidies are used by a variety of predators in areas developed for human use or residence. If subsidies promote population growth, these predators can have a negative effect on local prey species. The Glaucous Gull (Larus hyperboreus) is an abundant predator in northern Alaska that is believed to benefit from garbage as a supplemental food source, but this supposition has never been tested. In summer 2008 and 2009, we recorded the Glaucous Gull's diet and reproduction at 10 breeding colonies in northern Alaska. Colonies were in industrial, residential, and undeveloped areas and ranged from 5 to 75 km from the nearest landfill. By colony, garbage occurred in zero to 85% of pellets and food remains produced during the chick-rearing period, and the average number of chicks fledged per pair ranged from zero to 2.9. Random-forest analysis indicated that percent occurrence of garbage in the diet was the second most important factor (after number of eggs per pair) explaining variance in fledging rate. There was a significant positive correlation between percent occurrence of garbage in the diet and fledging rate in each year. If this correlation reflects a causal relationship, it suggests that human development that increases gulls' access to garbage could result in increased local gull populations. Such an increase could affect the gulls' natural prey species, including at least 14 species of shorebirds and waterfowl of conservation concern.

© 2010 by The Cooper Ornithological Society. All rights reserved. Please direct all requests for permission to photocopy or reproduce article content through the University of California Press's Rights and Permissions website, http://www.ucpressjournals.com/reprintInfo.asp.
Emily L. Weiser and Abby N. Powell "Does Garbage in the Diet Improve Reproductive Output of Glaucous Gulls?," The Condor 112(3), 530-538, (1 August 2010). https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2010.100020
Received: 26 January 2010; Accepted: 1 April 2010; Published: 1 August 2010
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top