Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
28 March 2022 A new species of Halecania (Leprocaulaceae, Lecanoromycetes) from eastern North America
Tomás J. Curtis, James C. Lendemer
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Halecania robertcurtisii is described as new to science from dry sandstone cliffs and overhangs in Ohio, USA, in eastern North America. It has a smooth and continuous to rimose-areolate thallus, pseudolecanorine apothecia with reddish to rust colored disks, and lacks lichen substances. The species is similar to Halecania subsquamosa but lacks the diagnostic unidentified terpenoid present in that taxon.

The state of Ohio in eastern North America is an example of a region that is both biologically diverse and heavily impacted by anthropogenic disturbances (Crooks et al. 2004). Although there has been much habitat destruction and fragmentation, it still hosts a plethora of unique and diverse habitats (Scheiring and Foote 1973). This diversity likely contributes to the large number of species that are known to occur in the state relative to the rest of North America (Tagliapietra and Sigovini 2010). Lichens are one group of organisms that have been largely overlooked even by naturalist and conservationist communities when compared to plants and vertebrates. This discrepancy of attention is likely due to their obscure nature.

Nevertheless, lichens in Ohio have been studied since the early 1800s, with a first baseline having been established for the Cincinnati area by Lea (1849). Most attention has focused on macrolichens, the larger foliose and fruticose species that regularly attract the attention of botanists and other naturalists (Andreas et al. 2007). In recent decades, study and outreach efforts for Ohio lichens have been led by Ray Showman, whose research on air pollution in the Ohio River Valley also concentrated on macrolichens (Showman 1972a, 1972b, 1975, 1981, 1997; Showman and Rudolph 1971; McClenahen et al. 2012).

Focus on macrolichens, rather than microlichens, was primarily due to microlichens being considered difficult to identify and there being very limited literature available (Thomson 1984, Wadleigh and Blake 1999). Recent increases in taxonomic and identification resources for microlichens, especially in temperate eastern North America, have made it possible to more fully document and describe this diverse part of the Ohio biota. Microlichens are more species rich than macrolichens, and extensive fieldwork has already led to the discovery of many rare and unreported species (Curtis 2019). Several species have been found that cannot be assigned to any taxon already known from Ohio or North America. One such species is an unusual crustose lichen growing on dry sandstone cliff faces and overhangs. Subsequent study led to the realization that it is an undescribed species of Halecania M. Mayrhofer, and as such it is described here.

Methods.

This study is based primarily on specimens collected by the first author and deposited in the Tom S. and Miwako K. Cooperrider Herbarium at Kent State University (KE). The coordinate locations of these specimens were mapped using SimpleMappr mapping software (Shorthouse 2010). Material from The New York Botanical Garden (NY) was also consulted, largely for comparison with reference specimens of Halecania subsquamosa (Müll. Arg.) van den Boom & H. Mayrhofer and H.punctata” ined. At KE, specimens were examined dry using a Fisher Scientific Stereomaster dissecting microscope, whereas mounted sections were examined with a Nikon Alphaphot YS2 compound microscope. At NY, specimens were dry examined using an Olympus SZ-STB dissecting microscope and mounted sections were examined with an Olympus BX53 compound microscope. Anatomy and tissue color reactions were studied from sections prepared by hand and mounted in water, iodine (I), or Lugols Solution (K/KI). Lichen substances were initially studied with spot tests using standard reagents (K, C, KC, P) and longwave UV following Brodo et al. (2001). The results of spot tests were then confirmed with thin-layer chromatography (TLC) which was performed following Culberson and Kristinsson (1970) as modified by Lendemer (2011) and using solvent C modified to a ratio of 200 ml toluene:30 ml glacial acetic acid.

The New Species

  • Halecania robertcurtisii T.J.Curtis & Lendemer, sp. nov.

  • MycoBank #MB842784.

  • Similar to H. subsquamosa but lacking the diagnostic unidentified terpenoid found in that species.

  • Type. USA. Ohio. Columbiana Co., Middleton Twp., Beaver Creek State Park, approx. 1.7 mi NE of the Bell School Rd./OH-7 jct, 40.7302, –80.6114, in a mature forest with mixed hardwoods (Acer, Carya, Magnolia, Quercus), Tsuga canadensis, and woody understory shrubs (Asimina, Hamamelis, Hydrangea on cliff), large cliff system with several seeps periodically flowing over bedrock, on sheltered SW-facing sandstone cliff face, 27 Nov. 2019, T.J. Curtis s.n. (KE L4125!, holotype; NY!, isotype).

  • Common Name. Robert's Cliff Dots.

  • Description. Thallus saxicolous, smooth, thin, continuous to rimose or even areolate (especially near thallus border), olive green to olive brown; cortex present, up to 50 lm thick though typically much thinner; medulla white, up to 150 lm thick though typically much thinner; apothecia discoid, usually numerous, initially pseudolecanorine, but with the photobiont layer excluded in mature apothecia and causing them to appear biatorine, 0.1–5.0 mm in diameter; discs smooth, plane, reddish to rusty red-brown or dark brown, epruinose; margins smooth, even, initially also paler than the disc, but eventually becoming concolorous with the disc as the photobiont layer is excluded; exciple paraplectenchymatous, tapering, broader at base (25–50 lm thick), with a brown pigmented cortex, often disappearing under the hymenium of older apothecia; hypothecium hyaline, 125–150 lm tall; hymenium hyaline, not inspersed with oil or crystals, 50–70 lm tall, height approximately even throughout an apothecium; epihymenium thin, up to 5 lm thick, brown pigmented to almost hyaline; paraphyses abundant, thin, filamentous, mostly unbranched, septate, 30–40 lm tall, apically broadening but not markedly swollen, often brown pigmented at apices; asci cylindrical to somewhat clavate, (22.5)–39.8–(55) × (6.3)–11.8–(16.3) lm, 8-spored, Catillaria-type; ascospores hyaline, ellipsoid, 1-septate, (8.1)–10.1–(12.5) × (2.8)–3.5–(4.4) lm, smooth, with a visible perispore; pycnidia up to 0.2 mm in diameter, reddish to rust colored, concolorous with apothecial disks, mostly immersed, numerous to sparse or absent; conidia hyaline, simple, bacilliform or short rod-shaped, 3–4 × 1.5 lm.

  • Chemistry. No substances detected. Thallus K-, C-, KC-, P-, UV-.

  • Etymology. The epithet “robertcurtisii” honors Robert Curtis (b. 1971) who mentored the first author in the field of biology and whose work as a biologist has been instrumental in raising awareness and implementing protocols to conserve rare lichens and lichen habitat in northeast Ohio.

  • Distribution and Ecology. To date, Halecania robertcurtisii is known from only two sites in eastern Ohio, both within the Unglaciated Allegheny Plateau (Fig. 2). At both sites, it grew at the base of sheltered sandstone bedrock outcroppings (Fig. 3) and alongside both other Halecania species known from the Unglaciated Allegheny Plateau (H. “rheophila” ined. and H. pepegospora (H.Magn.) van den Boom). At the type locality, it occurred with Polyozosia carlottiana (C.J. Lewis & Śliwa) S.Y. Kondr., L}okös & Farkas and Rinodina siouxiana Sheard, both of which are rare and also suspected to have a relatively narrow habitat preference (Śliwa et al. 2012, Sheard 2018). Whether or not H. robertcurtisii grows exclusively in these microhabitats is uncertain, but it is likely uncommon across its range. This is supported because the species was not found during other fieldwork in Ohio conducted by the first author, nor has it been found by the second author elsewhere in temperate eastern North America. Further study is needed before the total range of this species can be defined, though endemism to eastern North America seems likely as this region is known to host a high number of endemic species (Barr and Holsinger 1985).

  • Fig. 2.

    Known distribution of Halecania robertcurtisii in eastern North America.

    img-z3-1_79.jpg

    Fig. 3.

    Sandstone bluff at the type locality where Halecania robertcurtisii was found growing on the basal, sheltered portions of the bedrock along with several other rare crustose lichens.

    img-z4-1_79.jpg

    Discussion.

    Species within other genera that resemble Halecania robertcurtisii morphologically can be difficult to distinguish without microscopic and chemotaxonomic examination. Some Lecania A. Massal. species can look quite similar, but the two genera are easily distinguished by the conidia, which are short and bacilliform in Halecania (vs. relatively long and filiform in Lecania; Mayrhofer 1987, Nash et al. 2004), and by the Catillaria-type ascus in Halecania (vs. Bacidia-type or Biatoratype in Lecania; Brodo et al. 2001, Næsborg et al. 2007). Some saxicolous species of Catillaria A. Massal. or Rinodina (Ach.) Gray can also resemble H. robertcurtisii, but both genera differ fundamentally from Halecania. Catillaria species differ from Halecania in having paraphyses with markedly swollen, heavily pigmented apices and ascospores that lack a perispore (Kantvilas and van den Boom 2013). Saxicolous Rinodina species can look quite similar to H. robertcurtisii, especially R. oxydata (A. Massal.) A. Massal., in which the apothecial margins are also known to be pseudolecanorine (Kaschik 2006), but Rinodina species differ most notably in having brown-pigmented, thick-walled ascospores (Sheard 2010, Sheard et al. 2017). Of the saxicolous Catillaria species, C. patteeana D.P. Waters & Lendemer, with its biatorine apothecia and thin, greenish, continuous to rimose thallus, can resemble older thalli of H. robertcurtisii, but it can easily be distinguished by the sorediate thallus (Waters and Lendemer 2019).

    Currently there are seven other species of Halecania known from North America (Esslinger 2019, Spribille et al. 2020), two of which, H. “punctata” and H. “rheophila”, have yet to be formally described. Of the North American taxa, these two undescribed species are most similar to H. robertcurtisii in having smooth, rimose to areolate, olive colored thalli. However, H. “rheophila” produces pannarin (thallus PD+) and H. “punctata” produces a series of three diagnostic unidentified terpenes, while H. robertcurtisii lacks both of these and instead does not produce any secondary compounds (Harris and Ladd 2005; Lendemer unpublished data). Both H. “rheophila” and H. “punctata” also have lecanorine apothecia (Harris and Ladd 2005) rather than the pseudolecanorine and superficially biatorine apothecia in H. robertcurtisii (Fig. 1). Halecania pepegospora is the only other Halecania known to be sympatric with H. robertcurtisii but differs markedly in its dark gray, blastidate thallus and the production of argopsin (thallus PD+; Zhdanov 2020). It also typically occurs in more disturbed and exposed habitats (Lendemer et al. 2013).

    Fig. 1.

    Morphology of Halecania robertcurtisii (Curtis s.n. [KE L4125], NY). (A) Gross morphology of the thallus illustrating thin continuous to rimose crust and thallus edge. (B) Gross morphology of the thallus illustrating cracked, rimose central portions. (C, D) Detail of apothecia illustrating young apothecia with pseudolecanorine margin that becomes almost excluded with age (disks typically not as blackish in fresh material). (E) Transverse section of apothecium mounted in water. (F) Detail of ascospores mounted in water and phloxine with arrows indicating gelatinous perispore. Scales = 2.0 mm in A, 1.0 mm in B, 0.5 mm in C and D, 50 lm in E and F.

    img-z2-1_79.jpg

    The other North American species of Halecania that are not presently known to be sympatric with H. robertcurtisii include H. alpivaga (Th. Fr.) M. Mayrhofer, H. athallina Fryday, H. subsquamosa (syn. H. australis Lumbsch), and H. viridescens Coppins & P. James. Halecania alpivega, H. athallina, and H. subsquamosa all differ from H. robertcurtisii in thallus morphology (thick and somewhat placodioid in H. alpivega, completely immersed in H. athallina, and subsquamulose in H. subsquamosa) and apothecia morphology (persistent lecanorine margins present in H. alpivega and H. subsquamosa, and lecideine apothecia in H. athallina; Fryday and Coppins 1996, Nash et al. 2004, Spribille et al. 2020). Halecania subsquamosa also differs chemically in the production of a diagnostic unidentified terpenoid (van den Boom and Mayrhofer 2007; confirmed for this study). Halecania viridescens is fundamentally different in that it is corticolous, the thallus is bright green, and abundantly sorediate, but it also produces argopsin, which reacts PD+ red (Coppins 1989).

    Nineteen other species of Halecania have been described worldwide, most of which differ from H. robertcurtisii morphologically. Halecania fuscopannariae Etayo & van den Boom, H. pannarica M. Brand & van den Boom, H. parasitica Aptroot & K.H. Moon, H. santessonii M.P. Andreev, and H. subalpivaga S.Y. Kondr., L̋okös, & Hur all differ from H. robertcurtisii most notably in that they are lichenicolous (van den Boom and Etayo 2001, van den Boom 2009, Aptroot & Moon 2015, Kondratyuk et al. 2015, Kondratyuk et al. 2016). Other species are markedly different in thallus and/or apothecia morphology, such as H. etayoana Palice, van den Boom & Elix; H. lobulata van den Boom & Elix; H. pakistanica van den Boom & Elix; H. rhypodiza (Nyl.) Coppins; and H. spodomela (Nyl.) M. Mayrhofer, which have granular to squamulose or effigurate thalli; H. laevis M. Brand & van den Boom, which has black apothecial disks; and H. giraltiae van den Boom & Etayo, which is sorediate (Fryday & Coppins 1996, van den Boom & Elix 2005, van den Boom 2009). Some species differ from H. robertcurtisii in a combination of morphological and ecological characters, such as H. bryophila Fryday & Coppins and H. lecanorina (Anzi) M. Mayrhofer, which are bryophilous and have granular thalli; or H. panamensis van den Boom, which is corticolous and has black apothecial disks (Fryday and Coppins 1996, van den Boom et al. 2017). Halecania tornensis (H. Magn.) M. Mayrhofer differs from H. robertcurtisii most notably in its much larger ascospores (15–20 × 8–11 lm fide Fryday and Coppins 1996). Halecania elaeiza (Nyl.) M. Mayrhofer, H. micaceae Fryday & Coppins, and H. ralfsii differ in the production of pannarin and/or argopsin (Fryday and Coppins 1996, van den Boom 2009). Halecania ralfsii is very similar to H. robertcurtisii in its morphology and general ecology, but in addition to producing lichen substances, the ascospores in H. ralfsii are significantly larger than those of H. robertcurtisii (15–20 × 6–9 lm fide Mayrhofer 1987).

    Additional Specimen Examined. USA. Ohio. Hocking Co., Crane Hollow Nature Preserve, central Hood Hollow, 39.487672, –82.570123, in a steep forested stream valley with mature hardwoods (Quercus, Fagus, Acer, Liriodendron, Betula, Carya, Platanus) and conifers (Tsuga and Pinus), woody shrubs (Hamamelis, Carpinus) in the understory, massive sandstone bedrock outcroppings lining the outer edges of the valley and large boulders throughout, on a lightly shaded sandstone boulder at the base of a large cliff, 11 Aug. 2019, T.J. Curtis s.n. (KE-L3581).

    Reference Specimens of H. “punctata” Examined. USA. Missouri. Madison Co., Mark Twain National Forest, Rock Pile Mountain Wilderness, on shaded rhyolite in ravine, 3 Jun. 2004, D. Ladd 26180-B (NY); Amidon Memorial Conservation Area, Castor River Shut-Ins Natural Area, on granite along stream, 21 Oct. 2001, W.R. Buck 40027 (NY). Shannon Co., Ozark National Scenic Riverways, Prairie Hollow, 24 Sept. 1990, on rhyolite along stream, R.C. Harris 5837 (NY); Ozark National Scenic Riverways, Rocky Creek Shut-Ins (“Kelpzig Mill”), on rhyolite, 16 Apr. 1997, W.R. Buck 31870 (NY).

    Reference Specimens of H. subsquamosa Examined. AUSTRALIA. New South Wales, Oaky Creek, 37 km NE of Boorowa, on Reids Flat Rd., on eutrophic siliceous rocks in a river bed, 14 Aug. 1991, H.T. Lumbsch s.n. & H. Streimann = Lecanoroid Lichens Exs. No. 22 (NY, isotype of H. australis). BRAZIL. Rio de Janeiro, on rock, A.F.M. Glaziou s.n. (NY, possible isotype of Lecania subsquamosa Müll.Arg.). USA. Arkansas. Franklin Co., Ozark National Forest, Boston Mountain Ranger District, Shores Lake, on sandstone, 17 Oct. 2005, R.C. Harris 51781 (NY). Pope Co., Ozark National Forest, Kings Bluff, on sandstone, 7 Nov. 2002, W.R. Buck 43047 (NY).

    Literature Cited

    1.

    Andreas, B. K., R. E. Showman, and J. C. Lendemer. 2007. The 2006 combined Crum/Tuckerman workshop in Ohio. Evansia 24: 55–71. Google Scholar

    2.

    Aptroot, A. and K. H. Moon. 2015. New lichen records from Korea, with the description of the lichenicolous Halecania parasitica. Herzogia 28: 193–203. Google Scholar

    3.

    Barr, JR., T. C. and J. R. Holsinger. 1985. Speciation in cave faunas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 313–337. Google Scholar

    4.

    Brodo, I. M., S. D. Sharnoff, and S. Sharnoff. 2001. Lichens of North America. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT. 828 pp. Google Scholar

    5.

    Coppins, B. J. 1989. On some species of Catillaria s. lat. and Halecania in the British Isles. The Lichenologist 21: 217–227. Google Scholar

    6.

    Crooks, K. R., A. V. Suarez, and D. T. Bolger. 2004. Avian assemblages along a gradient of urbanization in a highly fragmented landscape. Biological Conservation 115: 451–462. Google Scholar

    7.

    Culberson, C. F. and H. D. Kristinsson. 1970. A standardized method for the identification of lichen products. Journal of Chromatography A 46: 85–93. Google Scholar

    8.

    Curtis, T. J. 2019. A study of the lichenized, lichenicolous, and allied fungi of northeast Ohio. OBELISK Newsletter of the Ohio Moss and Lichen Association 16: 2–12. Google Scholar

    9.

    Esslinger, T. L. 2019. A cumulative checklist for the lichen-forming lichenicolous and allied fungi of the continental United States and Canada. Version 23. Opuscula Philolichenum 18: 102–378. Google Scholar

    10.

    Fryday, A. M. and B. J. Coppins. 1996. Three new species in the Catillariaceae from the central highlands of Scotland. The Lichenologist 28: 507–512. Google Scholar

    11.

    Harris, R. C. and D. Ladd. 2005. Preliminary Draft: Ozark Lichens, enumerating the lichens of the Ozark Highlands of Arkansas, Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma. Published by the authors, Eureka Springs, AR. 249 pp. Google Scholar

    12.

    Kantvilas, G. and P. P. G. Van Den Boom. 2013. A new saxicolous species of Catillaria (lichenised Ascomycetes: Catillariaceae) from southern Australia. Journal of the Adelaide Botanic Garden 26: 5–8. Google Scholar

    13.

    Kaschik, M. 2006. Taxonomic studies on saxicolous species of the genus-Rinodina (lichenized Ascomycetes, Physciaceae) in the Southern Hemisphere with emphasis in Australia and New Zealand. Gebruder Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung, Science Publishers. 162 pp. Google Scholar

    14.

    Kondratyuk, S. Y., L. Lő Kös, E. Farkas, S. O. Oh, and J. S. Hur. 2015. New and noteworthy lichen-forming and lichenicolous fungi 3. Acta Botanica Hungarica 57: 345–382. Google Scholar

    15.

    Kondratyuk, S. Y., J. P. Halda, D. K. Upreti, G. K. Mishra, M. Haji Moniri E. Farkas, J. S. Park, B. G. Lee, D. Liu, J. J. Woo, R. G. Jayalal, S. O. Oh, and J. S. Hur. 2016. New and noteworthy lichen-forming and lichenicolous fungi 5. Acta Botanica Hungarica 58: 319–396. Google Scholar

    16.

    Lea, T. G. 1849. Catalogue of Plants, Native and Naturalized, Collected in the Vicinity of Cincinnati, Ohio, During the Years 1834–1844. T. K. Collins & P. G. Collins, Philadelphia, PA. 52 pp. Google Scholar

    17.

    Lendemer, J. C. 2011. A review of the morphologically similar species Fuscidea pusilla and Ropalospora viridis in eastern North America. Opuscula Philolichenum 9: 11–20. Google Scholar

    18.

    Lendemer, J. C., R. C. Harris, and E. A. Tripp. 2013. The lichens and allied fungi of Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 104: 1–152. Google Scholar

    19.

    Mayrhofer, M. 1987. Studien uber die saxicolen Arten der Flechtengattung Lecania in Europa I. Halecania gen. nov. Herzogia 7: 381–406. Google Scholar

    20.

    Mcclenahen, J. R., R. E. Showman, R. J. Hutnik, and D. D. Davis. 2012. Temporal changes in lichen species richness and elemental composition on a Pennsylvania atmospheric deposition gradient. Evansia 29: 67–73. Google Scholar

    21.

    Næsborg, R. R., S. Ekman, and L. Tibell. 2007. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Lecania (Ramalinaceae, lichenized Ascomycota). Mycological Research 111: 581–591. Google Scholar

    22.

    Nash, III, T. H., B. D. Ryan, C. Gries, and F. Bungartz (eds.). 2004. Lichen Flora of the Greater Sonoran Desert Region, Volume 2. Lichens Unlimited, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ. 742 pp. Google Scholar

    23.

    Scheiring, J. F. and B. A. Foote. 1973. Habitat distribution of the shore flies of northeastern Ohio (Diptera: Ephydridae). The Ohio Journal of Science 73: 152–156. Google Scholar

    24.

    Sheard, J. W. 2010. The Lichen Genus Rinodina (Ach.) Gray (Lecanoromycetidae, Physciaceae) in North America, North of Mexico. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 246 pp. Google Scholar

    25.

    Sheard, J. W. 2018. A synopsis and new key to the species of Rinodina (Ach.) Gray (Physciaceae, lichenized Ascomycetes) presently recognized in North America. Herzogia 31: 395–423. Google Scholar

    26.

    Sheard, J. W., A. K. Ezhkin, I. A. Galanina, D. Himelbrant, E. Kuznetsova, A. Shimizu, I. Stepanchikova, G. Thor, T. Tønsberg, L. S. Yakovchenko, and T. Spribille. 2017. The lichen genus Rinodina (Physciaceae, Caliciales) in north-eastern Asia. The Lichenologist 49: 617–672. Google Scholar

    27.

    Shorthouse, D. P. 2010. SimpleMappr, an online tool to produce publication-quality point maps. Retrieved from https://www.simplemappr.net. Accessed January 27, 2022. Google Scholar

    28.

    Showman, R. E. 1972a. Photosynthetic response with respect to light in three strains of lichen algae. The Ohio Journal of Science 72: 114–117. Google Scholar

    29.

    Showman, R. E. 1972b. Residual effects of sulfur dioxide on the net photosynthetic and respiratory rates of lichen thalli and cultured lichen symbionts. The Bryologist 75: 335–341. Google Scholar

    30.

    Showman, R. E. 1975. Lichens as indicators of air quality around a coal-fired power generating plant. The Bryologist 78: 1–6. Google Scholar

    31.

    Showman, R. E. 1981. Lichen recolonization following air quality improvement. The Bryologist 84: 492–497. Google Scholar

    32.

    Showman, R. E. 1997. Continuing lichen recolonization in the upper Ohio River Valley. The Bryologist 100: 478–481. Google Scholar

    33.

    Showman, R. E. and E. D. Rudolph. 1971. Water relations in living, dead, and cellulose models of the lichen Umbilicaria papulosa. The Bryologist 74: 444–450. Google Scholar

    34.

    Śliwa, L., J. Miadlikowska, B. D. Redelings, K. Molnar, and F. Lutzoni. 2012. Are widespread morphospecies from the Lecanora dispersa group (lichen-forming Ascomycota) monophyletic? The Bryologist 115: 265–277. Google Scholar

    35.

    Spribille, T., A. M. Fryday, S. Pérez-Ortega, M. Svensson, T. Tønsberg, S. Ekman, H. Holien, P. Res, K. Schneider, E. Stabentheiner, H. Thüs, J. Vondrák, and L. Sharman. 2020. Lichens and associated fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska. The Lichenologist 52: 61–181. Google Scholar

    36.

    Tagliapietra, D. and M. Sigovini. 2010. Biological diversity and habitat diversity: A matter of science and perception. Terre et Environnement 88: 147–155. Google Scholar

    37.

    Thomson, J. W. 1984. American Arctic Lichens: The Microlichens (Vol. 2). University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI. 688 pp. Google Scholar

    38.

    Van Den Boom, P. P. G. 2009. New Halecania species (Catillariaceae) from Europe and South America. The Bryologist 112: 827–832. Google Scholar

    39.

    Van Den Boom, P. P. G. and J. A. Elix. 2005. Notes on Halecania species, with descriptions of two new species from Asia. The Lichenologist 37: 237–246. Google Scholar

    40.

    Van Den Boom, P. P. G. and J. Etayo. 2001. Two new sorediate species of lichens in the Catillariaceae from the Iberian Peninsula. The Lichenologist 33: 103–110. Google Scholar

    41.

    Van Den Boom, P. P. G. and H. Mayrhofer. 2007. Notes on Lecania species from Australia, with the description of a new variety and a new combination in Halecania. Australasian Lichenology 60: 26–33. Google Scholar

    42.

    Van Den Boom, P. P. G., H. J. M. Sipman, P. K. Divakar, and D. Ertz. 2017. New or interesting records of lichens and lichenicolous fungi from Panama, with descriptions of ten new species. Sydowia 69: 47–72. Google Scholar

    43.

    Wadleigh, M. A. and D. M. Blake. 1999. Tracing sources of atmospheric sulphur using epiphytic lichens. Environmental Pollution 106: 265–271. Google Scholar

    44.

    Waters, D. P. and J. C. Lendemer. 2019. The lichens and allied fungi of Mercer County, New Jersey. Opuscula Philolichenum 18: 17–51. Google Scholar

    45.

    Zhdanov, I. S. 2020. Halecania ahtii (Leprocaulaceae), a new lichen species from the Russian Far East. Lower Plant Taxonomy News 54: 405–411. Google Scholar
    ©Copyright 2022 by the Torrey Botanical Society
    Tomás J. Curtis and James C. Lendemer "A new species of Halecania (Leprocaulaceae, Lecanoromycetes) from eastern North America," The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 149(1), 79-85, (28 March 2022). https://doi.org/10.3159/TORREY-D-21-00037.1
    Received: 30 October 2021; Published: 28 March 2022
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    7 PAGES


    Share
    SHARE
    KEYWORDS
    biodiversity
    crustose lichens
    Endemism
    Halecania punctata
    RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
    Get copyright permission
    Back to Top