Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
20 February 2024 New records of earthstar fungi (Basidiomycota) for different physiognomies of the Cerrado biome, Brazil
Kairo Dourado Barbosa, Renan de L. Oliveira, Iuri G. Baseia, Rhudson Henrique Santos Ferreira da Cruz
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

In the present study, six new records of fungi of the genus Geastrum Pers. are described in four different physiognomies of the Cerrado stricto sensu: Geastrum fimbriatum, G. lageniforme, G. morganiii, and G. hirsutum are the first records for the Brazilian Cerrado, being collected, respectively, in Typical Cerrado, Rupestrian Cerrado, Sparse Cerrado and Dense Cerrado. The specimen described as G. aff. rusticum is also the first record for the biome and was founded in Typical Cerrado. G. triplex is the second record for the Brazilian Cerrado and the first for the state of Bahia, found in physiognomies of Dense Cerrado. The taxa described present plates with photographs and micrographs for each species and a map for the collection locations.

The genus Geastrum Pers. is a gasteroid fungus popularly known as “earthstar fungi” because it presents the peridium dehiscence in rays at maturity, showing a starry shape; and has its spores dispersed through a bellows-type mechanism by the impact of raindrops, wind, or trampling of small animals (Miller and Miller 1988, Sunhede 1989, Soto and Wright 2000).

Geastrum representatives are commonly found in humid environments such as tropical and temperate forests (Pegler et al. 1995, Calonge 1998). However, they also inhabit semi-arid regions such as the Brazilian Caatinga and Cerrado (Baseia et al. 2003, Silva et al. 2011), as well as arid regions such as the deserts of North America (Bates 2004, Moreno et al. 2010). Geastrum has significant importance in forest ecosystems, participating in nutrient cycling, ecological balance, and the decomposition of organic matter in the soil (Pegler et al. 1995, Calonge 1998, Kuhar et al. 2016). The genus has great biochemical potential and can be used in the pharmaceutical industry or the production of antibiotics, as its representatives have bioproducts with anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and cytotoxic properties (Guerra-Dore et al. 2007, Mustafa et al. 2017, Sevindik et al. 2017). In addition, specimens of Geastrum can also be used in the decomposition of contaminants from textile effluents, such as the synthetic dye Remazol Brilliant Blue R (RBBR) (Santana et al. 2016).

The Cerrado biome is considered a global biodiversity and endemism hotspot (Myers et al. 2000, Strassburg et al. 2017, Gomes et al. 2018), being one of the 36 priority regions for preservation according to International Conservation, only behind the Amazon biome when compared to other Brazilian biomes. The Cerrado is the second largest biome in South America, with about 2 million km2, which corresponds to almost 22% of the Brazilian territory. Despite this, in recent years the rate of deforestation has increased dramatically, and only 2.2% of the Cerrado area is legally protected (Klink and Machado 2005). The biome has been suffering constant threats to the extinction of species due to the increase in unnatural fires, excessive human occupation, and the disorderly use of land, as well as logging and the direct action of the agricultural, urban, and industrial big sectors (Brannstrom et al. 2008, Mueller and Martha 2008, Ribeiro and Walter 2008, Mazzeto-Silva 2009, Carneiro-Filho and Costa 2016, Strassburg et al. 2017, MMA 2018).

The Cerrado features physiognomies that encompass forest, savannah, and grassland formations, constituting a vegetational complex of ecological, physiognomic, historical, and geological relationships with other regions of South America, Africa, and Australia (Beard 1953, Cole 1958, Eiten 1972, 1994, Allem and Valls 1987). The phytophysiognomy of the Cerrado that composes the Western Bahia (Northeastern region of Brazil) specifically covers the Cerrado stricto sensu, characterized by the presence of shrubs and subshrubs in addition to small trees, generally inclined, tortuous, or branched (Ribeiro and Walter 2008). Due to xeromorphism, some species have trunks with thick cork bark, called “suber”; some others have perennial underground organs, or “xylopods,” that allow efficient regrowth soon after burning or cutting. The leaves in general are more rigid or leathery, being densely pilose, to protect themselves (Ribeiro and Walter 2008).

The Cerrado stricto sensu is composed of different phytophysiognomies and may have deep soils with high aluminum content, acidic pH, lack of nutrients, low organic matter content, and frequent fires (Waibel 1948, Beard 1953, Goodland 1971, Goodland et al. 1979, Ab′Saber 1977, Coutinho 1992, Felfili and Silva 1993, Eiten 1994, Felfili et al. 1998). The set of these factors reflects on the structure and spatial distribution of the vegetation, originating distinct subdivisions of Cerrado stricto sensu such as, for example, Dense Cerrado, Typical Cerrado, Sparse Cerrado, and Rupestrian Cerrado (Ribeiro and Walter 2008).

According to Ribeiro and Walter (2008), the Dense Cerrado (Fig. 1A) is characterized by a predominantly arboreal type of vegetation, with vegetation cover between 50% and 70% and an average height of 5–8 m, being the densest and highest form of the Cerrado stricto sensu. Shrubs and herbs, in general, are thinner, due to shading resulting from the canopy of trees, and it is a type of vegetation that occurs mainly in purple, dark red, red-yellow latosols, and cambisols. Despite this, in general, the soil is moderately acidic, with elevated levels of aluminum and pH between 4.5 and 5.5, in addition to a lack of essential nutrients, mainly nitrogen and phosphorus (Ribeiro and Walter 2008). The Typical Cerrado (Fig. 1B) is a predominantly tree-shrub vegetation, with vegetation cover between 20% to 50% and an average height of 3–6 m, which can be understood as an intermediate form between the Dense Cerrado and the Scarce Cerrado. This type of vegetation occurs in dark red, red-yellow latosols, cambisols and quartz sands, in addition to lithosols or concretionary soils (Ribeiro and Walter 2008).

Fig. 1.

Phytophysiognomies of the Cerrado of Western Bahia found in the studied localities. A. Dense Cerrado. B. Typical Cerrado. C. Sparse Cerrado. D. Rupestrian Cerrado.

img-z3-1_73.jpg

The Sparse Cerrado (Fig. 1C) is characterized by predominantly tree-shrub vegetation, like a Typical Cerrado, with vegetation covering 5–20% and an average height of 2–3 m. This is the lowest and least dense phytophysiognomy of the Cerrado stricto sensu and occurs mainly in red-yellow latosols, cambisols, quartz sands, concretionary, hydromorphic, and lithologic soils (Ribeiro and Walter 2008). Finally, the Rupestrian Cerrado (Fig. 1D) is characterized by a predominantly arboreal-shrubby vegetation of rupestrian environments of lithologic or rocky soils, and having vegetation cover that varies between 5% and 20% with an average height of 2–4 m. This type of vegetation can occur in continuous stretches and mosaics, including other types. The Rupestrian Cerrado is often confused with the Sparse Cerrado; however, the substrate is easily differentiated by having little soil between the rocky outcrops. Litholic soils where this type of vegetation occurs originate from the decomposition of sandstones and quartzites, and are often acidic, poor in nutrients, and with low levels of organic matter (Ribeiro and Walter 2008).

Even with the presence of high levels of biodiversity and endemism in the Cerrado, the known diversity of macrofungi for the Western region of Bahia, a state located in the Northeast region of Brazil, is extremely scarce, with entire areas without any record, except for the surroundings of the city of Barreiras, which contains only a single published record of a gasteroid fungus of the genus Tulostoma Pers.: Tulostoma irregulireticulatum Dourado-Barbosa, R.L. Oliveira, A.A. Lima, Baseia & R. Cruz (Barbosa et al. 2023). In this sense, the present study aims to expand the knowledge about gasteroid fungi from Cerrado areas in western Bahia, Brazil, using morphological data, photographs, and illustrations to contribute to a better understanding of the diversity of these organisms in the Brazilian Cerrado.

Materials and Methods.

The collections were carried out in the rainy period of 2020 (March and April) and February 2023, in four locations distributed in two municipalities in the Western region of Bahia – Brazil: Barreiras and São Desidério (Fig. 2): a forestry area at Universidade Federal do Oeste da Bahia (UFOB - Campus Reitor Edgard Santos), municipality of Barreiras (12° 8′59.22″S, 45°01′07.22″W); Família Barbosa Farm road, municipality of Barreiras (12°08′47.2″S, 45°01′40.2″W); Família Barbosa Farm, municipality of Barreiras (12°08′11.10″S, 45°04′28.7″W); Lagoa Azul Municipality Park, municipality of São Desidério (12°22′16″S, 45°52′09″W); and Acaba Vida Waterfall, in the limits of the municipality of Barreiras and Luís Eduardo Magalhães (11°53′37″S, 45° 36′4″W).

Fig. 2.

Collection area map. A. Greater enlargement of the area, showing the collection points. B. Map of the state of Bahia, with emphasis on Barreiras Intermediate Geographic Region and the municipalities of Barreiras and São Desidério, northeast region of Brazil. C–G. Collection areas: C. Família Barbosa Farm. D. Família Barbosa Farm road. E. Federal University of Western Bahia (UFOB). F. Lagoa Azul Municipality Park. G. Acaba-vida Waterfall.

img-z5-1_73.jpg

Field specimen collection followed the modified protocol by Lodge et al. (2004), Baseia et al. (2014) and Fortuna (2020), following preexisting trails in search of substrates capable of growth for the genus Geastrum, such as decomposing trunks or wood, litter, herbivore manure, and soil. The specimens were photographed and removed from the substrate using a pocketknife. The fruiting bodies were packed in compartmentalized plastic cases. Samples taken from the substrate were tagged with collection information, collector′s name, and geographic position. Basidiomata colors were obtained in the field with fresh samples, following the codes and names of Kornerup and Wanscher (1978) color chart. At the laboratory, samples were dehydrated at 40 °C for a period of 24 to 48 hr, depending on the size of the basidiome.

The characterization of the macroscopic and microscopic structures of Geastrum was based on specific literature for the genus, such as the work by Sunhede (1989), Zamora et al. (2014), Miller and Miller (1988) and Sousa (2015). The macroscopic characterization was performed with the aid of Leica EZ4 and Nikon SMZ1500 stereomicroscopes, and microscopic analyses were performed using a Nikon Eclipse Ni light microscope, both with a Nikon DS-Ri1 camera attached and the NIS-Elements AR v.4.51.00 software. The assembly and preparation of the microscopic slides to obtain the exoperidium layers and measurements of the basidiospores were carried out in 5% potassium hydroxide (KOH). The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis to visualize the ornamentation of basidiospores and capillitia was performed on a Shimadzu SSX-550, following the protocol by Silva et al. (2011). The measurements of all analyzed structures followed the acronyms used by Sousa (2015) and Bates (2004), with n = number of analyzed samples. Thirty spores were randomly selected and measured, and the mean and standard deviation were calculated (χ and ±, respectively), both for diameter and height (including ornamentation), in addition to the average height/width ratio (Qm). The collected specimens were deposited in the fungal collection of the BRBA Herbarium at the Universidade Federal do Oeste da Bahia (UFOB), city of Barreiras, Bahia, Brazil.

Results.

Geastraceae Corda, Icones fungorum hucusque cognitorum 5: 25 (1842)
Geastrum fimbriatum Fr., Systema Mycologicum 3: 16 (1829)
(Fig. 3)

  • Etymology. Based on the distinctly fimbriated peristome.

  • Description. Immature basidiomata absent. Expanded basidiome saccate, 12 mm height (including peristome) × 36 mm width. Exoperidium formed by 5–6 rays, planar to revolute, slightly curved to the basidiome direction, triangular, non-hygroscopic. Mycelial layer orange white (5A2) when fresh, to greyish orange (5B3) when dehydrated, with a papyraceous surface, encrusted, persistent, falling off slightly with maturation. Fibrous layer orange white (5A2–6A2) when fresh, to pale orange (6A3) when dehydrated, surface papyraceous. Pseudoparenchymatous layer greyish red to brownish orange (7B3–6C3) when fresh, to brown (5E4) when dehydrated, slightly rimous and falling off at the base of the rays. Endoperidium subglobose, light brown to brown (7D4–7E5), 10 mm height (including peristome) × 21 mm width, sessile, glabrous. Peristome fimbriate to lacerated, not delimited, slightly mammiform to flattened, slightly darker than endoperidium. Gleba greyish brown (7F3). Rhizomorph absent.

  • Basidiospores brownish, globose, 4.5–5.9 × 4.2–5.7 µm [χ = 5.1 ± 0.4 × 5.0 ± 0.4, Qm = 1.03, n = 30], conspicuous ornamentation under LM (< 1 µm) and verrucous under SEM, verrucae short and columnar, truncated, rounded to flattened at the apex, pedicel inconspicuous. Eucapillitium yellowish brown, 2.6–7.3 (–8.3) µm diam., thin-walled (0.4–1.0 µm width), surface slightly encrusted, lumen evident, not septate, unbranched. Mycelial layer composed of hyaline hyphae, 1.3–3.3 µm diam., thin-walled (0.3–0.7 µm width), surface slightly encrusted, lumen evident, slightly sinuous, unbranched. Fibrous layer formed by hyaline hyphae, 3.3–7.6 (–10.7) µm diam., thin- to thick-walled (0.6–1.9 µm width), surface encrusted, slightly sinuous, lumen evident, not septate, unbranched. Pseudoparenchymatous layer composed of hyaline hyphae, 0.5–1.6 µm diam., thin- to thick-walled, ranging from subglobose, pyriform to irregular, 13.7–51.0 × 10.3–41.6 µm.

  • Habitat. Soil with litter, solitary.

  • Distribution. Cosmopolitan (Ponce de Leon 1968). In Brazil, this species was recorded previously in the states of Bahia (Trierveiler-Pereira et al. 2009), Pará (Leite et al. 2011, Trierveiler-Pereira et al. 2011); Paraíba (Trierveiler-Pereira et al. 2011), Pernambuco (Leite et al. 2007, Trierveiler-Pereira et al. 2011), Rio de Janeiro (Berkeley and Cooke 1876), Rio Grande do Norte (Sousa et al. 2014b) and Rio Grande do Sul (Rick 1961). This sample is the first record for the Cerrado biome.

  • Phytophysiognomy. Typical Cerrado.

  • Examined Material. Brazil, Bahia, Barreiras, Família Barbosa Farm, Cerrado stricto sensu, 12° 07′13.301″S, 45°04′38.023″W, 13 April 2020. Barbosa, K.D., KD0039 (BRBA-Fungos 0028).

  • Notes. Geastrum fimbriatum Fr. is characterized by having a heavily encrusted mycelial layer, globose to subglobose endoperidium with protuberant hyphae, and a distinctly fimbriated, non-delimited peristome (Sousa et al. 2014b, Sousa 2015). The species also names the section Fimbriata, which groups species by having an endoperidium covered by small salient hyphae and basidiospores ≤ 4.5 diam. (Zamora et al. 2014). Geastrum fimbriatum resembles G. setiferum Baseia & Milanez and G. fornicatum (Huds.) Hook, (both from the sect. Fornicata) by the presence of globose and brownish basidiospores (Baseia and Milanez 2002, Leite et al. 2007). However, some authors state that G. fornicatum has an ephemeral mycelial layer that forms a kind of cup in the mature basidiome (Zamora et al. 2014, Baseia and Milanez 2002, Bates 2004), while G. setiferum has a distinctly grooved peristome and endoperidium covered by cymbiform setae.

  • Two other morphologically related species to G. fimbriatum are G. rusticum Baseia, B.D.B. Silva & T.S. Cabral, and G. rufescens Pers., as both have indistinctly delimited peristome (Carlsson and Hæggström 2005, Cabral et al. 2014). However, G. rusticum has basidiospores with distinct ornamentation (Cabral et al. 2014). G. rufescens, on the other hand, has arched and much more robust basidiomata, reaching almost 60 mm in width (Bates 2004, Zamora et al. 2014). G. fimbriatum is here recorded for the first time for the Brazilian Cerrado biome, and this is the first collection from the phytophysiognomy of Typical Cerrado.

  • Fig. 3.

    Geastrum fimbriatum (BRBA-Fungos 0028). A–B. Mature basidiome in field. C. Detail of the exoperidium. D. Detail of the fimbriate peristome. E. Capillitium under SEM. F. Basidiospores under SEM. Scale: A–B = 10 mm; C = 4 mm; D = 1 mm; D = 10 mm; E = 4 µm; F = 4 µm.

    img-z6-1_73.jpg

    Geastrum hirsutum Baseia and Calonge, Mycotaxon 95: 302 (2006)
    (Fig. 4)

  • Etymology. In reference to the tomentose and hairy exoperidium.

  • Description. Immature basidiomata epigeous, globose to subglobose, reddish-orange to burnt sienna (7A7–7D8), 5–8 mm height × 7–9 mm width, caespitose, growing on a subiculum, yellowish white (1A2), formed by rigid, elongated hairs (0.5–1.5 mm long). Expanded basidiomata saccate, 6.1–18.2 mm height (including peristome) × 17–20 mm width. Open exoperidium formed by 6–7 rays, triangular to revolute, hygroscopic when dried. Mycelial layer greyish orange (5B3–5B4) when fresh, to chocolate brown (6E4) when dehydrated, hirsute surface completely covered with rigid hairs, teak brown (6F5), elongated (0.5–1.2 mm long), not encrusted, persistent. Fibrous layer pale yellow to orange grey (4A3–5B2) when fresh, to orange grey (5B3) when dehydrated, papyraceous surface. Pseudoparenchymatous layer coffee to brown (5F7–6E4) when fresh, and hair brown (5E4) when dehydrated, persistent. Endoperidium globose to subglobose, reddish brown (8D4–8E4), 3–6 mm height (including peristome) × 4–6 mm width, sessile, glabrous. Peristome finely fimbriate, distinctly delimited, reddish grey (8B2), slightly conical to flattened, slightly darker than the endoperidium. Gleba brown (6E4). Rhizomorph whitish (1A2), 4–9 mm long.

  • Basidiospores brownish, globose to subglobose, 3.81–5.9 × 3.2–5.8 µm [χ = 4.9 ± 0.6 × 4.7 ± 0.6, Qm = 1.06, n = 30], conspicuous ornamentation under LM (< 1 µm) and verrucous under SEM, verrucae short and columnar, truncated, rounded to pointed at the apex, pedicel discreet. Eucapillitium brownish-yellow, 2.8–48 µm diam., thin- to thick-walled (0.4–1.6 µm width), surface lightly encrusted, lumen evident, sinuous, not septate, unbranched. Mycelial layer composed of hyaline hyphae, with 3.9–7.3 (–8.2) µm diam., thin- to thick-walled (0.3–1.9 µm width), surface lightly encrusted, lumen evident, slightly sinuous, unbranched. Fibrous layer formed by hyaline hyphae, 2.1–6.2 µm diam., thin-walled (0.4–0.8 µm width), encrusted surface, slightly sinuous, evident lumen, not septate, unbranched. Pseudoparenchymatous layer composed of brownish-yellow to hyaline hyphae, 0.4–1.0 µm diam., thin- to thick-walled, ranging from subglobose, pyriform to irregular, 23.9–58.1 × 10.8–32.1 µm.

  • Habitat. Lignicolous, on decaying wood, in a gregarious growth pattern.

  • Distribution. French Guyana and Brazil. The species was previously recorded in the states of Pernambuco (Baseia and Calonge 2006, Trierveiler-Pereira et al. 2011), Pará (Sotão et al. 2009) and Paraíba (Sousa et al. 2014a). This one is the first record for the state of Bahia, and for the Cerrado biome.

  • Phytophysiognomy. Dense Cerrado.

  • Examined Material. Brazil, Bahia, Família Barbosa Farm road, Cerrado stricto sensu, Dense Cerrado, lignicolous, on decaying wood, with gregarious growth, 12°08′11.10″S, 45°04′28.7″W, 23 April 2020. Barbosa, K.D. (BRBA–Fungos 0050).

  • Notes. G. hirsutum is characterized by presence of a brownish hirsute mycelial layer, with elongated hairs (1.0–3.0), rigid and non-persistent, saccate basidiome, peristome fibrillose and distinctly delimited, and basidiospores with short ornamentation, verrucous under SEM (Sousa 2015). Specimens of G. hirsutum morphologically resemble species with the presence of hairs in the exoperidial layer, a characteristic that is particularly recurrent in species with subiculum such as G. brunneocapillatum J.O. Sousa, Accioly, M.P. Martín & Baseia, G. pusillipilosum J.O. Sousa, Alfredo, R.J. Ferreira, M.P. Martín & Baseia e G. rubellum P.-A. Moreau & C. Lécuru (Accioly et al. 2019). However, G. brunneocapillatum has longer hairs (0.5–2.0 mm long) and smaller basidiospores (2.8–4.0 µm diam.) compared to G. hirsutum. The mycelial layer of G. pusillipilosum and G. rubellum has even smaller hairs (0.3–0.68 mm long). Furthermore, in G. pusillipilosum the exoperidium is hairless and the basidiospores are much larger (5.0–6.5 µm diam.) when compared to G. hirsutum (4.7–4.9 µm diam.), while in G. rubellum the exoperidium is formed by smaller hairs with a reddish to brownish color (Accioly et al. 2019).

  • It is worth mentioning that G. brunneocapillatum, G. rubellum, and G. hirsutum are characterized as semi-cryptic species, even though they are not sister species (Vondrak et al. 2009, Hodkinson and Lendemer 2011, Korshunova et al. 2017). This statement further reinforces that the presence of hair in the exoperidial layer is not a morphologically reliable characteristic for describing new species or delimiting existing species, strongly suggesting that this character represents an evolutionary convergence within Geastrum (Accioly et al. 2019).

  • Fig. 4.

    Geastrum hirsutum (BRBA-Fungos 0050). A. Mature basidiomata in field. B. immature basidiome C. Peridium hyphae under SEM. D. Tomentum details, with hirsute hairs. E. Rhizomorph under SEM. F. Capillitium under SEM. G. Basidiospores under SEM. Scale: A = 10 mm; B = 20 mm; C = 20 µm; D = 0.5 mm; E = 5 µm; F = 5 µm; G = 2 µm.

    img-z8-1_73.jpg

    Geastrum lageniforme Vittad., Mem. Accad. Torino 5: 16 (1842)
    (Fig. 5)

  • Etymology. Based on the flask-like shape of the mature basidiomata.

  • Description. Immature basidiome epigeous, lageniform, dark blonde (5D4), 29–31 mm height × 16–20 mm width. Non-encrusted surface. Rhizomorph absent. Expanded basidiome 12–21 mm height (including peristome) × 29–52 mm width. Open exoperidium formed by 6–7 rays, revolute, hygroscopic, arachnoid, tapering at the tips and twisting below the basidiome, 12–27 mm. Mycelial layer persistent, not encrusted, papyraceous, detaching with age and forming distinct longitudinal grooves, greyish brown “nougat” (5D3) when fresh, and nutria (5F3) when dehydrated. Fibrous layer greyish red (7B3) when fresh, to pale orange (5A3) when dehydrated, papyraceous. Pseudoparenchymatous layer slightly rimose, falling off at the base in some basidiomes, reddish grey (7B2) when fresh, to brown (7E4) when dehydrated. Endoperidium mammiform, sessile, depressed globose to subglobose, surface glabrous, dark brown (6F3), 9–19 mm height (including peristome) × 14–25 mm width. Apophysis and pedicel absent. Peristome mammiform to conical, finely fimbriate, delimited, 2.0–3.0 mm high, slightly darker than endoperidium at the apex. Gleba chocolate brown (6F4). Rhizomorph absent.

  • Basidiospores brownish, subglobose, 4.6–5.7 × 4.3–5.4 µm [χ = 5.1 ± 0.3 × 4.8 ± 0.3, Qm = 1.07, n = 30], conspicuous ornamentation under LM (< 1 µm) and verrucous under SEM, verrucae long and columnar, truncated, rounded to flattened at the apex, pedicel discreet. Eucapillitium brownish, 2.7–6.4 µm diam., thin-walled (< 1 µm width), surface not encrusted, lumen evident, septate, and unbranched. Mycelial layer composed of hyaline hyphae, 2.2–7.8 µm diam., thin-walled (< 1.1 µm width), not encrusted, slightly sinuous, unbranched. Fibrous layer composed of hyaline hyphae, 2.7–5.9 µm diam., thick-walled (> 1 µm width), slightly sinuous, with evident lumen, non-septate and unbranched. Pseudoparenchymatous layer formed by hyaline cells, thick-walled (> 1.3 µm width), ranging from globose, cylindrical to ellipsoid, 22.6–73.5 × 14.0–44.7 µm.

  • Habitat. On decaying wood, in a gregarious growth pattern.

  • Distribution. Africa (Dissing and Lange 1962, Dring 1964), Americas (Calonge et al. 2005, Bates 2004, Trierveiler-Pereira et al. 2011, Cortez et al. 2008, Rick 1961), and Europe (Calonge 1998, Sunhede 1989). In Brazil, this species was recorded previously in the states of Amazonas (Cabral et al. 2014), Bahia (Trierveiler-Pereira et al. 2009), Ceará (Sousa et al. 2014b), Pará (Leite et al. 2011), Paraíba (Sousa et al. 2014b), Pernambuco (Trierveiler-Pereira et al. 2011), Rio de Janeiro (Hennings 1904), Rio Grande do Norte (Sousa et al. 2014b), and Rio Grande do Sul (Rick 1961, Cortez et al. 2008). This sample is the first record for the Cerrado biome.

  • Phytophysiognomy. Rupestrian Cerrado.

  • Examined Material. Brazil, Bahia, São Desidério, Lagoa Azul Municipality Park, Cerrado stricto sensu, Rupestrian Cerrado, on decaying wood, in a gregarious growth pattern, 12°22′16″S, 45° 52′09″W, 23 February 2023. Cruz, R.H.S.F., Barbosa, K.D., KD0066 (BRBA-Fungos 0126).

  • Notes. Geastrum lageniforme Vittad. is characterized by having a mature basidiome saccate with long rays, horizontally distributed and tapered at the end, in addition to a distinctly delimited fimbriated peristome and verrucous basidiospores on SEM (Sousa 2015). Specimens of G. lageniforme are commonly confused with G. saccatum Fr. and G. triplex Jungh., as both species can present a kind of collar around the endoperidium during the basidiome maturation (Zamora et al. 2013). However, G. saccatum belongs to subsection Marginata, characterized by presenting fibrillose, non-folded, thickened and distinctly delimited peristome, and rhizomorphs with acicular crystals with rare horn-like crystals mixed (Zamora et al. 2014); G. triplex belongs to the section Trichaster, characterized by presenting exoperidium saccate to arched, or even pseudo-fornicated, and rhizomorphs with rosette-shaped bipyramidal crystal aggregates (Zamora et al. 2014); while G. lageniforme belongs to the subsection Lageniformia, characterized by presenting a pseudoparenchymatous layer that does not react with syringaldazine, saccate exoperidium and rhizomorphs with hornlike crystals often grouped in candelabrum-like structures (Zamora et al. 2014). Furthermore, both species are easily distinguishable in the field from G. lageniforme. Representatives of G. saccatum differ by not having a mycelial layer with longitudinal grooves, arachnoid rays and lageniform immature basidiomata (Sousa et al. 2014b, Sousa 2015), while G. triplex have much larger basidiomes, measuring up to 150 mm, in addition to a distinct strongly prominent collar formed from the pseudoparenchymatous layer (Calonge 1998, Zamora et al. 2013). Geastrum lageniforme is the first record for the Brazilian Cerrado biome and the first collected in phytophysiognomies of the Rupestrian Cerrado.

  • Fig. 5.

    Geastrum lageniforme (BRBA-Fungos 0126). A–B. Mature basidiome in field. C. Immature basidiomata in field. D. Peridium hyphae under SEM. D. Details of the rays, endoperidium, and the delimited peristome. E. Capillitium under SEM. F. Basidiospores under SEM. Scale: A = 20 mm; B = 10 mm; C = 20 mm; D = 4 mm; E–F = 5 µm.

    img-z10-1_73.jpg

    Geastrum morganii Lloyd, Mycological Writings 1(8): 80 (1902)
    (Fig. 6)

  • Etymology. In reference to the American botanist Andrew Price Morgan.

  • Description. Immature basidiome epigeous, mammiform, cinnamon brown (6D6), with gregarious growth, 7.1–13 mm height × 5.2–9.8 mm width. Surface not encrusted, rhizomorph evident 7.76–10.63 mm long. Expanded basidiomata saccate, 8.0–17.7 mm height (including peristome) × 15.9–25.1 mm width. Open exoperidium formed by 5–6 arched rays, involute, non-hygroscopic, 7.3–11.2 mm. Mycelial layer single-layered, orange grey (6B2) when fresh, to clay (5D5) to honey yellow (5D6) when dehydrated, persistent and not encrusted, with a papyraceous consistency. Fibrous layer pale orange (5A3), papyraceous. Pseudoparenchymatous layer slightly rimous, yellowish grey (4B2) when fresh, to linoleum brown (5E7) when dehydrated. Endoperidium mammiform, brownish grey (5C2), 8.7–10.4 mm height (including peristome) × 6.6–11.4 mm width, sessile, surface glabrous. Apophysis and pedicel absent. Peristome mammiform, irregularly sulcate, not delimited, concolor with the endoperidium, slightly darker at apex. Gleba brownish gray (6F2). Rhizomorph absent.

  • Basidiospores brownish, globose to slightly elliptical, 2.5–3.7 × 2.5–3.1 µm [χ = 3.2 ± 0.4 × 2.9 ± 0.3, Qm = 1.12, n = 30], conspicuous ornamentation under LM (< 1 µm) and verrucous under SEM, verrucae long and columnar, truncated, rounded to flattened at the apex, pedicel discreet. Eucapillitium brownish, 1.88–4.38 µm diam., thin-walled (< 1 µm width), surface not encrusted, lumen evident, unbranched. Mycelial layer composed of greenish hyphae, 1.9–3.7 µm diam., thin-walled (< 1 µm width), not encrusted, slightly sinuous, unbranched. Fibrous layer formed by hyaline hyphae, 1.9–3.8 (–5) µm diam., thick-walled (> 1 µm width), not encrusted, lumen evident, slightly sinuous, unbranched. Pseudoparenchymatous layer composed of hyaline to brownish cells, thick-walled (> 1 µm width), ranging from globose, cylindrical to ellipsoid, 12.3–22.5 × 6.9–15.2 µm. Rhizomorph composed of hyaline hyphae, greenish yellow, 1.9–2.5 µm diam., thin-walled (< 1 µm width), surface encrusted, lumen evident, slightly sinuous.

  • Habitat. Growing over termite mound, in a gregarious growth pattern.

  • Distribution. Africa (Dissing and Lange 1962); America (Coker and Couch 1928, Calonge and Mata 2006, Hemmes and Desjardin 2011, Caffot et al. 2013); Europe (Sunhede 1989). In Brazil, this species was previously recorded in the state of Rio Grande do Norte (Sousa et al. 2014a).

  • Phytophysiognomy. Sparse Cerrado.

  • Examined Material. Brazil, Bahia, Barreiras, Família Barbosa Farm, Cerrado stricto sensu, Sparse Cerrado, over termite mound, with gregarious growth, 12°8′11.10.0″S, 45°04′28.7″W, 25 March 2020. Barbosa, K.D., KD0034 (BRBA–Fungos 0034).

  • Notes. G. morganii is characterized by having a saccate basidiomata at maturity, a sessile endoperidium, and an irregularly sulcate and non-delimited peristome, in addition to having basidiospores with columnar warts flattened at the apex (Sousa et al. 2014a, Sousa 2015). G. morganii is morphologically similar to G. violaceum Rick, as it has a sessile endoperidium and an irregularly sulcate peristome (Sousa et al. 2014c, Sousa 2015). Both species belong to section Corollina, subsection Plicostomata, characterized by having an irregularly sulcate peristome, not thickened, and indistinctly delimited (Zamora et al. 2014). However, G. violaceum has a color with shades that vary from lilac to pink (Sousa et al. 2014a), while G. morganii has a chestnut-like brown, brownish, or yellowish-brown color (Sousa et al. 2014a). Another species similar to G. morganii is G. elegans Vittad, which also has an irregularly sulcate peristome; however, in specimens of G. morganii, the delimitation is not as evident as the delimitation of G. elegans, which has a greater number of grooves (10–20) and an endoperidium with a little amount of crystalline matter (Sunhede 1989, Calonge and Mata 2006). Furthermore, G. elegans is phylogenetically grouped in the section Elegantia, characterized by having a well-developed mesoperidium and a distinctly sulcate peristome (Zamora et al. 2014).

  • Geastrum morganii can also be compared to specimens of G. reticulatum Desjardin & Hemmes, as both species have conical or mammiform immature basidiomata and saccate mature basidiomata. However, G. reticulatum is distinguished by having an exoperidial surface covered by a reticulated network of raised hairs and a regularly sulcate and distinctly delimited peristome (Hemmes and Desjardin 2011), while G. morganii has an irregularly sulcate and indistinctly delimited peristome (Sousa et al. 2014a, Sousa 2015). Finally, G. triplex is another species morphologically related to G. morganii in that it has a collar around the endoperidium formed by the pseudoparenchymatous layer; however, G. triplex has more robust basidiomata, a distinctly delimited endoperidium, and a fibrillose peristome (Sunhede 1989, Kuhar and Papinutii 2009). This is the first record of Geastrum morganii for the state of Bahia, and for the Brazilian Cerrado biome.

  • Fig. 6.

    Geastrum morganii (BRBA-Fungos 0034). A. Mature basidiome in field. B. Details of the peridium, and non-delimited peristome. C. Immature basidiome mammiform. D. Details of the rhizomorph. E. Capillitium under SEM. F. Basidiospores under SEM. Scale A = 15 mm; B, C–D = 5 mm; D = 5 mm; E = 5 µm; F = 2 µm.

    img-z12-1_73.jpg

    Geastrum aff. rusticum Baseia, B.D.B. Silva and T.S. Cabral, Nova Hedwigia 98: 267 (2012)
    (Fig. 7)

  • Etymology. Based on the rustic appearance of basidiomata.

  • Description. Immature basidiome absent. Expanded basidiome saccate, 8–11 mm height (including peristome) × 22–25 mm width. Open exoperidium formed by 5–7 rays, horizontal, triangular to revolute, non-hygroscopic. Mycelial layer pale orange (5A3) when fresh and greyish orange (5B3) when dehydrated; papyraceous surface, encrusted, persistent; falling off slightly in irregular portions during the maturation process. Fibrous layer platinum blonde (4B3) when fresh to brownish orange (5C3) when dehydrated, coriaceous surface. Pseudoparenchymatous layer brownish orange to greyish red (6C3–7B3) when fresh, and brownish gray (5D3–5E4) when dehydrated; persistent, falling off at the base of basidiome rays with age. Endoperidium globose to subglobose, greyish brown to brown (7D3–7F4), 9–13 mm height (including peristome) × 12–16 mm width, sessile, surface glabrous. Apophysis and pedicel absent. Peristomium fimbriate to lacerated, not delimited, slightly mammiform, concolor with the endoperidium, and sometimes slightly darker. Gleba dark brown (7F8). Rhizomorph absent.

  • Basidiospores chestnut brown, globose to subglobose, 6.2–6.7 (–7.3) × 5.1–5.8 µm [χ = 6.1 ± 0.3 × 5.4 ± 0.3, Qm = 1.05, n = 30], conspicuous ornamentation under LM (<1 µm) and verrucous under SEM, verrucae short and columnar, truncated, rounded to flattened at the apex, pedicel discreet. Eucapillitium yellowish-brown, 3.2–7.4 µm diam., thick-walled (> 1 µm width), surface slightly encrusted, lumen evident, not septate, unbranched. Mycelial layer composed of hyaline, thin-walled hyphae (< 1 µm width), 1.2–4.1 µm in diam., surface slightly encrusted, lumen evident, sinuous, coiled, unbranched. Fibrous layer formed by hyaline hyphae, 3.5–7.1 µm diam., thin- to thick-walled (0.7–3.3 µm width), surface encrusted, slightly sinuous, lumen evident, not septate, unbranched. Pseudoparenchymatous layer composed of thin-walled hyaline hyphae (< 1 µm width), ranging from subglobose, pyriform, to irregular, 22.2–77.6 × 18.2–47.5 µm.

  • Habitat. Soil covered by litter and decaying wood, in a gregarious growth pattern.

  • Distribution. Brazil. The species was previously recorded in the states of Rio Grande do Norte (Cabral et al. 2014), Ceará (Sousa et al. 2014b) and Paraíba (Sousa et al. 2014b).

  • Phytophysiognomy. Rupestrian Cerrado.

  • Examined Material. Brazil, Bahia, Barreiras, Municipal Park of Life, Acaba Vida Waterfall, Cerrado stricto sensu, Soil covered by litter and decaying wood, in a gregarious growth pattern, 11° 53′37″S, 45°36′4″W, 19 February 2023. Barbosa, K.D. & Cruz, R.H.S.F. (BRBA–Fungos 0112).

  • Notes. Geastrum rusticum Baseia, B.D.B. Silva & T.S. Cabral is characterized by having mature basidiomata saccate to slightly arched, and a semi-hypogeous immature basidiome, in addition to a heavily encrusted mycelial layer, a peristome lacerated and non-delimited, and basidiospores verrucous with short ornamentations (Cabral et al. 2014, Sousa 2015). The basidiomata of the sample collected in the Cerrado were found growing in fresh soil covered by litter, while the type species has a registered habit as a lignicolous. Together with this, the sample from the Cerrado has basidiomata with measurements remarkably similar to the type material, with 22–25 mm in diameter in the mature sample in the new record, while the original material has 23–26 mm in diameter (Cabral et al. 2014). The difference that makes this sample like “aff.” is that the Cerrado materials have slightly larger basidiospores (6.2–6.7 µm diam., reaching up to 7.3 µm diam.), while the holotype described for the Atlantic Forest areas in Brazil (type locality) has relatively smaller basidiospores (3.5–5.1 µm diam.). Due to this being the unique difference found between both species, together with the substrate, it was reasonable to indicate the sample described here as species affinis of Geastrum rusticum.

  • G. aff. rusticum is morphologically similar to specimens of G. fimbriatum Fr. by the presence of an encrusted mycelial layer, and saccate to arched basidiomata (Fazolino 2009, Sunhede 1989); however, G. aff. rusticum is distinguished by not having an endoperidium with protuberant hyphae (Sunhede 1989, Cabral et al. 2014). Another species quite similar to G. aff. rusticum is G. echinulatum T.S. Cabral, B.D.B. Silva & Baseia, as both species also have a mature basidiome saccate and non-delimited peristome (Silva et al. 2013, Cabral et al. 2014, Sousa 2015). Still, G. echinulatum differs by the presence of a subiculum, basidiospores with distinct ornamentation, and a pinkish pseudoparenchymatous layer (Silva et al. 2013, Sousa 2015).

  • G. aff. rusticum can also be compared to specimens of G. hieronymi Henn., as both species present an encrusted mycelial layer, a fibrillose and non-delimited peristome, and immature basidiomata that are relatively hypogeous (Bates 2004, Cabral et al. 2014, Sousa 2015); however, specimens of G. hieronymi have pedicels and protuberant hyphae in the endoperidium (Bates 2004, Cabral et al. 2014, Sousa 2015). Another close species is G. floriforme Vittad., based on the phylogenetic position; however, G. floriforme is distinguished by the presence of a non-persistent mycelial layer, larger basidiospores (5.0–7.0 µm in diameter), and an endoperidium with a furfuraceous surface (Cabral et al. 2014, Sousa 2015). No records of G. rusticum, or any similar or affinis specimen, are registered for the Brazilian Cerrado biome, so this is the first record for the Cerrado in a Typical Cerrado phytophysiognomy.

  • Fig. 7.

    Geastrum aff. rusticum (BRBA-Fungos 0112). A–B. Mature basidiomata in field. C. Details of the peridium. D. Details of the endoperidium, and non-delimited peristome. E. Capillitium under SEM. F. Basidiospores under SEM. Scale: A = 15 mm; B = 10 mm; C = 1.5 mm; D = 3 mm; E = 5 µm; F = 5 µm.

    img-z14-1_73.jpg

    Geastrum triplex Jungh., Tijdschr. Nat. Gesch. Physiol. 7: 287 (1840)
    (Fig. 8)

  • Etymology. Based on the well-observed three layers (fibrous, pseudoparenchymatous, and mycelial) in the peridium, with the pseudoparenchymatous layer forming a collar.

  • Description. Immature basidiome absent. Expanded basidiome 27.9–33.3 mm height (including peristome) × 45.7–48.7 mm width. Open exoperidium formed by 6–7 arched rays, involute, non-hygroscopic, 25.2–21.3 mm. Mycelial layer persistent, not encrusted, coriaceous, orange gray (6B2) when fresh, and golden blonde (5C4) when dehydrated. Fibrous layer coriaceous, orange white (5A2). Pseudoparenchymatous layer slightly rimose, with the presence of a brownish collar (6E7). Endoperidium globose, sessile, surface glabrous, chocolate brown (6F4), 23.8–26.1 mm height × 22.9–24.7 mm width. Apophysis and pedicel absent. Peristome conical, fimbriate, delimited, orange gray (6B2) to brownish (6E7) at apex, 2.6–2.3 mm in height. Gleba dark brown (7F4). Rhizomorph absent.

  • Basidiospores brownish, globose to subglobose, 4.7–6.0 × 4.1–5.8 µm [χ = 5.1 ± 0.3 × 4.8 ± 0.4, Qm = 1.07, n = 30], conspicuous ornamentation under LM (<1 µm) and verrucous under SEM, verrucae long and columnar, truncated, rounded to flattened at the apex, pedicel discreet. Eucapillitium brownish, thick-walled 3.1–6.4 µm diam., (> 1 µm width), surface encrusted, strongly verrucous, lumen evident, unbranched. Mycelial layer composed of hyaline hyphae, 3.1–7.6 µm diam., thick-walled (> 1 µm width), surface encrusted, lumen evident, slightly sinuous, branched. Fibrous layer formed by hyaline hyphae, 4.2–8.3 µm diam., thick-walled (1.3–2.1 µm) width, surface not encrusted, septate, slightly curved, lumen evident. Pseudoparenchymatous layer composed of hyaline hyphae, thin- to thick-walled, (0.7–1.3 µm width), ranging from subglobose, pyriform, oblong, to oval, 32.9–82.5 × 15.9–48.5 µm.

  • Habitat. Soil covered by litter and over termite mound, in a gregarious growth pattern.

  • Distribution. Cosmopolitan (Dissing and Lange 1962, Sunhede 1989, Grgurinovic 1997, Calonge 1998, Bates 2004, Leite and Baseia 2007, Hemmes and Desjardin 2011). In Brazil, this species was previously recorded in the states of Amazonas (Cabral et al. 2014), Ceará (Sousa et al. 2014b), Paraíba (Sousa et al. 2014), Paraná (de Meijer 2006), Pernambuco (Drechsler-Santos et al. 2008, Trierveiler-Pereira et al. 2011), Rio Grande do Norte (Leite and Baseia 2007), Rio Grande do Sul (Rick 1961), Santa Catarina (Sobestiansky 2005), and São Paulo (Baseia et al. 2003).

  • Phytophysiognomy. Dense Cerrado.

  • Examined Material. Brazil, Bahia, Barreiras, Família Barbosa Farm road, Cerrado stricto sensu, soil covered by litter and over termite mound, in a gregarious growth pattern, 12°08′47.2″S, 45°01′40.2″W, 15 April 2020. Barbosa, K.D., KD0041 (BRBA–Fungos 0138); KD0042 (BRBA–Fungos 0009).

  • Notes. Geastrum triplex Jungh. is characterized by the prominent collar formed from the opening of the pseudoparenchymatous layer, robust basidiomata in the field, a relatively squamulose mycelial layer, a fibrillose peristome, and a well-delimited sessile endoperidium (Sousa et al. 2014b, Sousa 2015). Commonly, the specimens of G. triplex from South America are much smaller (4.7–35 mm in diam.) compared to species from Europe, which are much larger, reaching up to 150 mm in diameter (Calonge 1998). This comparison can be easily observed in the descriptions of G. triplex for Brazil, as evidenced in the works of Trierveiler-Pereira et al. (2011), Sousa et al. (2014b), and Sousa (2015). G. triplex specimens morphologically resemble G. saccatum Fr., G. lageniforme Vittad., and G. rufescens Pers. because all these species present a pseudoparenchymatous collar in the mature basidiome. However, contrary to the representatives of G. triplex, these species are distinguished by having a small and much less conspicuous collar (Sunhede 1989).

  • Like G. triplex, specimens of G. melanocephalum (Czern.) V.J. Staněk also have a collar around the endoperidium and squamous mycelial layer, being phylogenetically close in the section Trichaster. However, G. melanocephalum differs by presenting a pedicellate endoperidium (Kasuya et al. 2012, Zamora et al. 2014). Other species, such as G. fimbriatum, and G. litchiforme Desjardin & Hemmes, also morphologically resemble G. triplex; however, G. fimbriatum is distinguished by having a non-delimited peristome and an encrusted mycelial layer, while G. litchiforme has an ephemeral mycelial layer with pyramidal tufts and a non-delimited peristome. Geastrum triplex is the second record of this species for the Brazilian Cerrado (the first one was described by Baseia et al. 2003 in an area of vegetational transition in the state of São Paulo, Brazil), and the first for the state of Bahia.

  • Fig. 8.

    Geastrum triplex (BRBA-Fungos 0009). A. Mature basidiomata in field. B. Details of the endoperidium with delimited peristome. C. Details of the exoperidium. D. Delimited peristome. E. Capillitium under SEM. F. Basidiospores under SEM. Scale: A = 2.5 mm; B = 1 mm; C = 3 mm; D = 1 mm; E = 10 µm; F = 5 µm.

    img-z16-1_73.jpg

    ©Copyright 2024 by The Torrey Botanical Society

    Literature Cited

    1.

    Ab′saber, A. N. 1977. Espaços ocupados pela expansão dos climas secos na América do Sul, por ocasião dos períodos glaciais quaternários. [Spaces occupied by the expansion of dry climates in South America, during the Quaternary glacial periods]. São Paulo, Paleoclimas 3: 1–19. Google Scholar

    2.

    Accioly, T., J. O. Sousa, P. A. Moreau, C. Lécuru, B. D. B. Silva, M. Roy, M. Gardes, I. G. Baseia, and M. P. Martín. 2019. Hidden fungal diversity from the Neotropics: Geastrum hirsutum, G. schweinitzii (Basidiomycota, Geastrales) and their allies. PloS one 14: e0211388. Google Scholar

    3.

    Allem, A. C. and J. F. M. Valls. 1987. Recursos Forrageiros Nativos do Pantanal Mato-Grossense [Native Forage Resources of the Mato Grosso Pantanal]. Brasília, Embrapa-Cenargen. 339 pp. Google Scholar

    4.

    Barbosa, K. D., R. D. L. Oliveira, A. D. A. D. Lima, I. G. Baseia, and R. H. S. F. D. Cruz. 2023. Tulostoma irregulireticulatum (Agaricaceae, Basidiomycota): A new species from Cerrado Biome of northeastern Brazil. New Zealand Journal of Botany 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.2023.2198721Google Scholar

    5.

    Baseia, I. G. and F. D. Calonge. 2006. Geastrum hirsutum: A new earthstar fungus with a hairy exoperidium. Mycotaxon 95: 301–304. Google Scholar

    6.

    Baseia, I. G., M. A. Cavalcanti, and A. I. Milanez. 2003. Additions to our knowledge of the genus Geastrum (Phallales: Geastraceae) in Brazil. Mycotaxon 85: 409–416. Google Scholar

    7.

    Baseia, I. G. and A. I. Milanez. 2002. Geastrum setiferum (Gasteromycetes): A new species with a setose endoperidium. Mycotaxon 84: 135–140. Google Scholar

    8.

    Baseia, I. G., B. D. B. Silva, and R. H. S. F. Cruz. 2014. Fungos Gasteroides no Semiárido do Nordeste Brasileiro [Gasteroid fungi in the semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil]. Vol. 1, Feira de Santana: Print Midia. 132 pp. Google Scholar

    9.

    Bates, S. T. 2004. Arizona members of the Geastraceae & Lycoperdaceae (Basydiomycota, Fungi). M.S. Thesis. Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ. 69 pp. Google Scholar

    10.

    Beard, J. S. 1953. The savanna vegetation of northern tropical America. Ecological Monographs 23: 149–215. Google Scholar

    11.

    Berkeley, M. J. and M. C. Cooke. 1876. The fungi of Brazil, including those collected by J.W.H. Trail, Esq. M.A., Journal of the Linnean Society of London. Botany 15: 363–398. Google Scholar

    12.

    Brannstrom, C., W. Jepson, A. M. Filippi, D. Redo, Z. Xu, and S. Ganesh. 2008. Land change in the Brazilian Savanna (Cerrado), 1986–2002: Comparative analysis and implications for land-use. Land Use Policy 25: 579–595. Google Scholar

    13.

    Cabral, T. S., B. D. B. D., Silva, P. Marinho, and I. G. Baseia. 2014. Geastrum rusticum (Geastraceae, Basidiomycota), a new earthstar fungus in the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest–a molecular analysis. Nova Hedwigia 98(1–2): 265–272. Google Scholar

    14.

    Caffot M. L. H., G. Robledo, and L. S. Domínguez. 2013. Gasteroid mycobiota (Basidiomycota) from Polylepis australis woodlands of central Argentina. Mycotaxon 123–491. Google Scholar

    15.

    Calonge, F. D. 1998. Gasteromycetes: Lycoperdales, Nidulariales, Phallales, Sclerodermatales, Tulostoma-tales. Flora Micológica Ibérica, Vol. 3. Real Jardin Botánico, Madrid, Spain. 271 pp. Google Scholar

    16.

    Calonge, F. D. and M. Mata. 2006. Adiciones e correcciones al catálago de Gasteromycetes da Costa Rica [Additions and corrections to the catalog of Gasteromycetes of Costa Rica]. Boletín de la Sociedad Micológica de Madrid 30: 111–119. Google Scholar

    17.

    Calonge, F. D., M. Mata, and J. Carranza. 2005. Contribución al catálogo de los Gasteromycetes (Basidiomycotina, Fungi) de Costa Rica [Contribution to the catalog of Gasteromycetes (Basidiomycotina, Fungi) of Costa Rica]. Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 62: 23–45. Google Scholar

    18.

    Carlsson, R. A. L. F. and C. A. Hæggström. 2005. Geastrum rufescens in the Åland Islands, SW Finland. Karstenia 45: 63–68. Google Scholar

    19.

    Carneiro-Filho, A. and K. Costa. 2016. A expansão da soja no Cerrado: Caminhos para a ocupação territorial, uso do solo e produção sustentável [The expansion of soy in the Cerrado: Paths for territorial occupation, land use and sustainable production].  http://www.inputbrasil.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/A-Expans%C3 %A3o-da-Soja-noCerrado_Agroicone_INPUT.pdf . Retrieved May 9, 2023. Google Scholar

    20.

    Coker, W. C. and J. N. Couch. 1928. The Gasteromycetes of the Eastern United States and Canada. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 283 pp. Google Scholar

    21.

    Cole, M. M. 1958. A savana Brasileira [The Brazilian savannah]. Boletim Carioca de Geografia 11: 5–52. Google Scholar

    22.

    Cortez, V. G., I. G. Baseia, and R. M. B. Silveira. 2008. Gasteromicetos (Basidiomycota) no Parque Estadual de Itapuã, Viamão, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil [Gasteromycetes (Basidiomycota) in Itapuã State Park, Viamão, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil]. Revista Brasileira de Biociências 6: 291–299. Google Scholar

    23.

    Coutinho, L. M. 1992. O cerrado e a ecologia do fogo [The cerrado and the ecology of fire]. Ciência Hoje. Vol. 12, Brasília, Brazil. 68 pp. Google Scholar

    24.

    De Meijer, A. A. R. 2006. Preliminary list of the Macromycetes from the Brazilian state of Paraná. Boletin do Museu Botânico Municipal 68: 1–55. Google Scholar

    25.

    Dissing, H., and M. Lange. 1962. Gasteromycetes of Congo. Bulletin du Jardin Botanique de l'État a Bruxelles 32: 325–416. Google Scholar

    26.

    Drechsler-Santos, E. R., F. Wartchow, I. G. Baseia, T. B. Gibertoni, and M. A. Q. Cavalcanti. 2008. Revision of the Herbarium URM I. Agaricomycetes from the semi-arid region of Brazil. Mycotaxon 104: 9–18. Google Scholar

    27.

    Dring, D. M. 1964. Gasteromycetes of West Tropical Africa. Mycological Papers 98. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, UK. 60 pp. Google Scholar

    28.

    Eiten, G. 1972. The Cerrado vegetation of Brazil. Botanical Review 38: 201–341. Google Scholar

    29.

    Eiten, G. 1994. Vegetação do Cerrado [Cerrado vegetation], pp. 17–73. In M. N. Pinto, ed. Cerrado: Caracterização, Ocupação e Perspectivas [Cerrado: Characterization, Occupation and Perspectives], 2nd ed. UnB/Sematec, Brasilia, Brazil. Google Scholar

    30.

    Fazolino, E. 2009. O gênero Geastrum Pers. (Phallomycetidae, Basidiomycota) em algumas áreas de Mata Atlantica e Caatinga no Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil [The genus Geastrum Pers. (Phallomycetidae, Basidiomycota) in some areas of Atlantic Forest and Caatinga in Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil]. Doctoral dissertation, Tese MS Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Rio Grande Do Norte). Google Scholar

    31.

    Felfili, J. M. and M. C. Silva JR . 1993. A comparative study of cerrado (sensu stricto) vegetation in Central Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 9: 277–289. Google Scholar

    32.

    Felfili, J. M., M. C. Silva JR ., T. S. Filgueiras, and P. E. Nogueira. 1998. Comparison of cerrado (sensu stricto) vegetation in Central Brazil. Ciência e Cultura 50: 237–243. Google Scholar

    33.

    Fortuna, J. L. 2020. Protocolos de Coletas, Análises, Identificação e Armazenamento de Fungos Ambientais [Protocols for Collection, Analysis, Identification and Storage of Environmental Fungi]. Universidade do Estado da Bahia, Departamento de Educação – Campus X, Teixeira de Freitas, Bahia, Brazil. 37 pp. Google Scholar

    34.

    Gomes, L., H. S. Miranda, and M. M. D. C. Bustamante. 2018. How can we advance the knowledge on the behavior and effects of fire in the Cerrado biome? Forest Ecology and Management 417: 281–290. Google Scholar

    35.

    Goodland, R. A. 1971. A physiognomic analysis of the “Cerrado” vegetation of Central Brazil. Journal of Ecology 59: 411–419. Google Scholar

    36.

    Goodland, R. A., M. G. Ferri, and E. Amado. 1979. Ecologia do Cerrado [Ecology of the Cerrado]. Belo Horizonte: Itatiaia. 193 pp. Google Scholar

    37.

    Grgurinovic, A. C. 1997. Larger Fungi of South Australia. Botanic Gardens of Adelaide and State Herbarium, Adelaide, Australia. 725 pp. Google Scholar

    38.

    Guerra-Dore, C. M., T. C. Azevedo, M. C. R. De Souza, L. A. Rego, J. C. M. De Dantas, F. R. F. Silva, H. A. O. Rocha, I. G. Baseia, and E. L. Leite. 2007. Antiinflammatory, antioxidant and cytotoxic actions of b -glucan-rich extract from Geastrum saccatum mushroom. International Immunopharmacology 7: 1160–1169. Google Scholar

    39.

    Hemmes, D. E. and D. E. Desjardin. 2011. Earthstars (Geastrum, Myriostoma) of the Hawaiian Islands including two new species, Geastrum litchiforme and Geastrum reticulatum. Pacific Science 65: 477–496. Google Scholar

    40.

    Hennings, P. 1904. Fungi fluminenses a cl. E. Ule collecti. Hedwigia 43: 78–95. Google Scholar

    41.

    Hodkinson, B. P. and J.C. Lendemer. 2011. Molecular analyses reveal semi-cryptic species in Xanthoparmelia tasmanica. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 106: 108–119. Google Scholar

    42.

    Kasuya, T., K. Hosaka, H. Sakamoto, A. Uchida, T. Hoshino, and M. Kakishima. 2012. New records of Geastrum from Japanese sand dunes. Mycotaxon 118: 1–15. Google Scholar

    43.

    Klink, C. A., and R. B. MacHado. 2005. Conservation of the Brazilian cerrado. Conservation Biology 19: 707–713. Google Scholar

    44.

    Kornerup, A. and J. H. Wanscher. 1978. Methuen Handbook of Colours, 3rd ed. Eyre Methuen, London. 252 pp. Google Scholar

    45.

    Korshunova, T., A. Martynov, T. Bakken, and B. Picton. 2017. External diversity is restrained by internal conservatism: New nudibranck mollusc contributes to the cryptic species problem. Zoologica Scripta 46: 683–692. Google Scholar

    46.

    Kuhar, F. and L. Papinutii. 2009. Geastrum episcopale: A new noticeable species with red-violet exoperidium. Mycologia 101: 535–538. Google Scholar

    47.

    Kuhar, F., V. C. Castiglia, and J. C. Zamora. 2016. Detection of manganese peroxidase and other exoenzymes in four isolates of Geastrum (Geastrales) in pure culture. Revista Argentina de Microbiologia 48: 274–278. Google Scholar

    48.

    Leite, A. G. and I. G. Baseia. 2007. Novos registros de Geastraceae Corda para o Nordeste Brasileiro [New records of Geastraceae Corda for the Brazilian Northeast]. Sitientibus. Série Ciências Biológicas 7: 178–183. Google Scholar

    49.

    Leite, A. G., F. D. Calonge, and I. G. Baseia. 2007. Additional studies on Geastrum from northeastern Brazil. Mycotaxon 101: 103–111. Google Scholar

    50.

    Leite, A. G., H. K. Assis, B. D. B. Silva, H. M. P. Sotão, and I. G. Baseia. 2011. Geastrum species from the Amazon Forest, Brazil. Mycotaxon 118: 383–392. Google Scholar

    51.

    Lodge, D. J., J. F. Ammirati, T. E. Odell, G. M. Mueller, S. M. Huhndorf, C. J. Wang, J. N. Stokland, J. P. Schmit, L. Ryvarden, P. R. Leacock, M. Mata, L. Umaña, F. Wu, and C. L. Czederpitiz. 2004. Terrestrial and lignicolous macrofungi. pp. 127–172. In G. Mueller, M. Foster, and G. Bills, eds. Biodiversity of Fungi: Inventory and Monitoring Methods. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam. Google Scholar

    52.

    Mazzeto-Silva, C. E. 2009. Ordenamento Territorial no Cerrado Brasileiro: Da fronteira monocultora a modelos baseados na sociodiversidade [Territorial Planning in the Brazilian Cerrado: From the monoculture frontier to models based on sociodiversity]. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente 19: 89–109. Google Scholar

    53.

    Miller, O. K. and H. H. Miller. 1988. Gasteromycetes: Morphological and Development Features. Mad River Press, Eureka, CA. 157 pp. Google Scholar

    54.

    [MMA] Ministério Do Meio Ambiente. 2018. O Bioma Cerrado [The Cerrado Biome]. Brasilia (DF).  http://www.mma.gov.br/biomas/cerrado . Retrieved July 7, 2022. Google Scholar

    55.

    Moreno, G., M. Lizárraga, M. Esqueda, and M. L. Coronado. 2010. Contribution to the study of gasteroid and secotioid fungi of Chihuahua, Mexico. Mycotaxon 112: 291–315. Google Scholar

    56.

    Mueller, C. C. and G. B. Martha JR . 2008. A agropecuária e o desenvolvimento socio-econômico recente do Cerrado. [Agriculture and the recent socioeconomic development of the Cerrado]. pp. 105–169. In F. G. Faleiro and A. L. De F. Neto, eds. Savanas: Desafios e estratégias para o equilíbrio entre sociedade, agronegócio e recursos naturais. [Savannas: Challenges and strategies for the balance between society, agribusiness and natural resources]. Embrapa Cerrados, Planaltina, DF, Brazil. Google Scholar

    57.

    Mustafa, S., H. Akgu, I. Akata, and Z. Selamoglu. 2017. Geastrum pectinatum as an alternative antioxidant source with some biochemical analysis. Medical Mycology 3: 1–5. Google Scholar

    58.

    Myers, N., R. A. Mittermeier, C. G. Mittermeier, G. A. B. Da Fonseca, and J. Kent. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858. Google Scholar

    59.

    Pegler, D. N., T. Laessoe, and B. M. Spooner. 1995. British Puffballs, Earthstars and Stinkhorns; An Account of the British Gasteroid Fungi. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK. 265 pp. Google Scholar

    60.

    Ponce De Leon, P. A. 1968. A Revision of the Family Geastraceae. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL. 78 pp. Google Scholar

    61.

    Ribeiro, J. F. and B. M. T. Walter. 2008. As principais fitofisionomias do bioma Cerrado [The main phytophysiognomies of the Cerrado biome]. pp. 151–212. In S. M. Sano], S. P. De Almeida, and J. F. Ribeiro, eds. Cerrado: Ecologia e Flora. Embrapa Cerrado/Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, Brasilia, Brazil. Google Scholar

    62.

    Rick, J. 1961. Basidiomycetes Eubasidii no Rio Grande do Sul. Brasília. Iheringia 9: 451–480. Google Scholar

    63.

    Santana, M. D. F., L. D. S. I. Rodrigues, T. S. Amaral, and Y. G. Pinheiro. 2016. Fenoloxidase e biodegradação do corante têxtil Azul Brilhante de Remazol R (RBBR) para três espécies de macrofungos coletadas na Amazônia [Phenoloxidase and biodegradation of textile dye Azul Brilhante de Remazol R (RBBR) for three species of macrofungi collected in the Amazon]. SaBios-Revista de Saúde e Biologia 11: 53–60. Google Scholar

    64.

    Sevindik, M., H. Akgul, I. Akata, and Z. Selamoglu. 2017. Geastrum pectinatum as an alternative antioxidant source with some biochemical analysis. Medical Mycology 3: 1–4. Google Scholar

    65.

    Silva, B. D. B., J. O. Sousa, and I. G. Baseia. 2011. Discovery of Geastrum xerophilum from the Neotropics. Mycotaxon 118: 355–359. Google Scholar

    66.

    Silva, B. D. B., T. S. Cabral, P. Marinho, N. K. Ishikawa, and I. G. Baseia. 2013. Two new species of Geastrum (Geastraceae, Basidiomycota) found in Brazil. Nova Hedwigia 96: 445–456. Google Scholar

    67.

    Sobestiansky, G. 2005. Contribution to a Macromycete survey of the states of Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina in Brazil. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 48: 437–457. Google Scholar

    68.

    Soto, M. K. and J. E. Wright. 2000. Taxonomia del genero Geastrum (Basidiomycetes, Lycoperdales) em la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina [Taxonomy of the genus Geastrum (Basidiomycetes, Lycoperdales) in the Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina]. Boletin de la Sociedad Argentina de Botanica 34: 185–201. Google Scholar

    69.

    Sousa, J. O. 2015. O gênero Geastrum Pers. (Geastraceae, Basidiomycota): Ocorrência, chave taxonômica e descrições de novas espécies no nordeste brasileiro [The genus Geastrum Pers. (Geastraceae, Basidiomycota): Occurrence, taxonomic key and descriptions of new species in northeastern Brazil]. Master's thesis. Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil. 162 pp. Google Scholar

    70.

    Sousa, J. O., B. D. B. Silva, and I. G. Baseia. 2014a. Geastrum from the Atlantic Forest in northeast Brazil – new records for Brazil. Mycotaxon 129: 169–179. Google Scholar

    71.

    Sousa, J. O., B. D. Silva, D. S. Alfredo, and I. G. Baseia. 2014b. New records of Geastraceae (Basidiomycota: Phallomycetidae) from Atlantic rainforest remnants and relicts of northeastern Brazil. Darwiniana, Nueva Serie 2: 207–221. Google Scholar

    72.

    Sousa, J. O., L. A. Morais, Y. M. Nascimento, and I. G. Baseia. 2014c. Updates on the geographic distribution of three Geastrum species from Brazilian semi-arid region. Mycosphere 5: 467–474. Google Scholar

    73.

    Strassburg, B. B. N., T. Brooks, R. Feltran-Barbieri, A. Iribarrem, R. Crouzeilles, R. Loyola, A. E. Latawiec, F. J. B. Oliveira Filho, C. A. De M. Scaramuzza, F. R. Scarano, B. Soares-Filho, and A. Balmford. 2017. Moment of truth for the Cerrado hotspot. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1: 1–3. Google Scholar

    74.

    Sunhede, S. 1989. Geastraceae (Basidiomycota): Morphology, Ecology, and Systematics with Special Emphasis on the North European Species. Synopsis Fungorum 1, Fungiflora, Oslo, Norway. 534 pp. Google Scholar

    75.

    Trierveiler-Pereira, L., F. D. D. Calonge, and I. G. Baseia. 2011. New distributional data on Geastrum (Geastraceae, Basidiomycota) from Brazil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 25: 577–585. Google Scholar

    76.

    Trierveiler-Pereira, L., K. M. T. Bezerra, J. L. Bezerra, and I. G. Baseia. 2009. First records of Geastraceae and Nidulariaceae (Basidiomycota, Fungi) from Bahia, Northeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Biociências, Porto Alegre 7: 316–319. Google Scholar

    77.

    Vondrak, J., P. Říha, U. Arup, and U. Søchting. 2009. The taxonomy of the Caloplaca citrina group (Teloschistaceae) in the Black Sea region; with contributions to the cryptic species concept in lichenology. The Lichenologist 41: 571–604. Google Scholar

    78.

    Waibel, L. 1948. Vegetation and land use in the Planalto central of Brazil. Geographical Review 38: 529–554. Google Scholar

    79.

    Zamora, J. C., F. D. Calonge, K. Hosaka, and M. P. Martín. 2014. Systematics of the genus Geastrum (Fungi: Basidiomycota) revisited. Taxon 63: 447–497. Google Scholar

    80.

    Zamora, J. C., J. C. Calonge, and M. M. Martín. 2013. New sources of taxonomic information for earthstars (Geastrum, Geastraceae, Basidiomycota): Phenoloxidases and rhizomorph crystals. Phytotaxa 131: 1–10. Google Scholar
    Kairo Dourado Barbosa, Renan de L. Oliveira, Iuri G. Baseia, and Rhudson Henrique Santos Ferreira da Cruz "New records of earthstar fungi (Basidiomycota) for different physiognomies of the Cerrado biome, Brazil," The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 151(1), 73-92, (20 February 2024). https://doi.org/10.3159/TORREY-D-23-00024.1
    Received: 21 August 2023; Published: 20 February 2024
    KEYWORDS
    gasteroid fungi
    Geastraceae
    Geastrum
    hotspots
    neotropical
    taxonomy
    Back to Top