BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
12 December 2011 Can host plant richness be used as a surrogate for galling insect diversity?
Walter Santos de Araújo
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Galling insects are the only insects capable of manipulating plant tissues to form complex structures. The number of known species of galling insect is small compared to the large diversity that statistical estimates suggest for this group. The study of galling insect diversity can be a difficult task in mega-diverse environments such as in tropical regions, thus justifying the use of surrogates. This study investigated whether or not host plant richness and super-host taxa can be used as surrogates for galling insect diversity. Surveys were conducted in 15 areas of cerrado sensu stricto in different localities of the Brazilian Cerrado. The results showed that host plant richness was the main predictor of galling insect diversity. The plant genus Qualea (Vochysiaceae), with 18 galling species, was the super-host taxon used in the analyses. Despite the influence of genus on galling insect richness, the abundance of Qualea was not related to galling insect diversity. Surrogates can be a useful tool for estimating galling insect richness and diversity patterns, both of which are relevant for conservation assessments.

Introduction

Galling insects are the most sophisticated herbivores in nature [1]. Strongly influenced by resource availability [3], they are capable of manipulating plant tissues to form complex structures [2] that are efficient both for nutrition [4] and for defense against the natural enemies of these insects [5]. All of these characteristics make this group one of the most diverse guilds of herbivorous insects [6].

Espírito-Santo and Fernandes [7] estimated that there may be more than 132,000 species of galling insects. The paper by Price [6] also supports this idea and shows that, in the majority of galling taxa, adaptive radiation is an opportunistic event. Studying this great diversity can be a difficult and expensive task, requiring a large spatial, sampling and temporal effort [7]. Thus, the use of indirect factors to predict the diversity of galling insects can be useful, especially for studies in regions with rich biodiversity, such as the vegetation of the tropics [8].

In the case of galling, two factors may cause variations in the diversity patterns of these insects: host plant richness and super-host taxa [101112]. The first indicates that galling insect diversity is strongly dependent on the number of host species [13], suggesting that each plant species represents a potential niche for galling insects [11]. However, super-host taxa are species or genera of plants that have a high intrinsic diversity of galling insects [11], and their presence and abundance can affect the local diversity of insects independently of plant species richness [14]. This study tested the correlation between these two factors and galling diversity, and investigated whether or not host plant richness and super-host taxa can be used as surrogates for measuring galling insect richness.

Methods

Study areas

The surveys were conducted in 15 areas of the Brazilian Cerrado (Table 1, Fig. 1). This region presents a climate classified as Aw Köppen (tropical rain), with dry winters (April to September) and rainy summers (October to March) [15]. The vegetation studied was neotropical savanna (cerrado sensu stricto), which can have different forms and subtypes of vegetation, such as sparse cerrado, typical cerrado, dense cerrado and cerrado with rocky outcrops [15].

Fig. 1.

Distribution map of sampling points in the Brazilian Cerrado. Legend: 1 = Fazenda Lageado, GO; 2 = Banana Menina, GO; 3 = Senador Canedo, GO; 4 = Residencial Itanhangá, GO; 5 = Cerrado Bela Vista, GO; 6 = Fazenda Bom Sucesso, GO; 7 = Reserva da UEG, GO; 8 = Pedreira, GO; 9 = Fazenda do Geraldo, GO; 10 = Cerrado Caldas Novas, GO; 11 = Caça e Pesca, MG; 12 = Floresta do Lobo, MG; 13 = APA Cafuringa, DF; 14 = Rebio Contagem, DF; 15 = Porto Real, TO.

10.1177_194008291100400405-fig1.tif

Sampling and data analyses

Between February and May of 2010, we conducted inventories of galling insects and host plants from 10 plots (10 × 10m) randomly established in each study site. Sampling was performed once in each area and it involved only woody plants with a circumference greater than 15 cm at ground level. The plants were all identified in the field. Each plant included in the sample had the leaves, stems and flowers inspected to a height of 2.5 m in the search for galls. Gall morphotypes were used to survey the galling insects, assuming that each morphotype is unique (2) and that each galling species is specific to its host plant [16; 7; 17]. The morphological characteristics used in gall differentiation were gall occurrence, form, color, pubescence and size.

In order to test for super-host taxa as surrogates for galling insect diversity, we used the genus Qualea (Vochysiaceae). This genus has 11 species in the Cerrado [18], and most of them are widely distributed throughout the biome, particularly in cerrado sensu stricto [19]. Furthermore, a large diversity of galling insects has been documented associated with species of Qualea [20]. Species such as Qualea grandiflora, Qualea multiflora, and Qualea parviflora, all presenting associated galling species, were present in the areas sampled (Fig. 2).

The t test was used to test for effects of the presence and absence of Qualea on the local richness of galling insects. The abundance of individuals of the genus Qualea and the local richness of galling insects were correlated by linear regression. Linear regression analysis was used to correlate plant species richness with galling insect richness. Statistica 7.0 software was used for all tests.

Table 1.

Characterization of the areas studied in the Brazilian Cerrado.

10.1177_194008291100400405-table1.tif

Results

Altogether we recorded 112 galling insect species in 64 plant species. Most galls (76%) occurred in leaves, followed by stems (22%), apical buds (1%) and petioles (1%). The plant families that were richest in galling insects were Vochysiaceae (19 species), Fabaceae (13) and Malpighiaceae (12). In most sites, gall sampling was relatively good in view of the large diversity of galling insects and host plants studied (Fig. 3). The mean number of galls/site was 16.6 (± 6.6); Fazenda Lajeado was the most diverse site, with 30 gall morphotypes, and REBio Contagen was the poorest with only 8 morphotypes.

Host plant richness was the best predictor of the galling insect diversity (r2 = 0.46; p < 0.01; Fig. 4); however, host plant richness did not explain the frequency of plants with galls (r2 = 0.13; p = 0.17).

Fig. 2.

Examples of gall morphotypes sampled in the Qualea species: A) discoid leaf gall in Q. grandiflora; B) globoid stem gall in Q. grandiflora; C) globoid leaf gall in Q. multiflora; D) starry leaf gall in Q. multiflora; E) starry leaf gall in Q. parviflora and F) discoid leaf gall in Q. parviflora.

10.1177_194008291100400405-fig2.tif

The genus Qualea hosted 18 galling insect species and Q. parviflora hosted 8 species alone. The species Q. parviflora had no effect on local gall richness, but when all of the species of the genus were considered the effect was significant (F2,23 = 32.92; p < 0.05; Fig. 5). Areas where the genus Qualea occurred presented an average of 19.1 (± 5.05) galling insect species, and areas where this genus was absent had fewer than half this number of galling insect species (8.5 ± 0.5). There was no influence of the presence of super-host taxa on the number of plants with galls (F2,23 = 440.27; p > 0.05).

The abundance of Qualea was not related to gall richness (r2 = 0.004; p = 0.81) or frequency of plants with galls (r2 = 0.002; p = 0.86). Similarly, no relationship was found between galling insect richness in the genus Qualea and total galling insect richness (r2 = 0.13; p = 0.18), or between the abundance of Qualea plants and plant species richness, although there was a slight tendency of areas with fewer species to have a greater dominance of the genus Qualea (r2 = 0.007; p = 0.76).

Fig. 3.

Rarefaction curve of the accumulated richness of galling insects in relation to number of individuals sampled.

10.1177_194008291100400405-fig3.tif

Fig. 4.

Relationship between galling insect richness and plant richness (r2 = 0.46; p < 0.01; y = −3.36 + 0.62x).

10.1177_194008291100400405-fig4.tif

Fig. 5.

Galling insect richness between areas with presence of genus Qualea, only Qualea parviflora and areas where Qualea not occurred. Means with different letters reflect significant differences with P < 0.05.

10.1177_194008291100400405-fig5.tif

Discussion

Whether or not plant diversity influences the richness of herbivorous insects is one of the most discussed issues in insect-plant interaction ecology, especially where galling insects are concerned [11, 14, 212223]. Among these influences, host plant richness has received most attention, resulting in studies that are favorable [10, 22, 24] or opposed [13, 25, 26] to this hypothesis. Our results show that the local richness of gall morphotypes is positively influenced by host plant richness, suggesting that this is a good predictor of galling insect diversity.

Most galling species have a species-specific relationship with their host [17], supporting the hypothesis of a relationship with plant richness [27]. Bräuniger et al. [28] also showed that plant species richness might be a good surrogate for predicting galling insect diversity. Usually, when one factor is correlated with the presence of certain taxa, this factor can be considered a surrogate for the diversity of this taxon [24, 29, 30].

The presence of Qualea increased the local galling insect richness, but the abundance of species of this genus was not associated with galling insect richness. One explanation for these results could be that the local abundance of Qualea is not dependent on plant richness and tends to be inversely proportional to this factor. For this reason, areas with higher plant species richness, and consequently galling, showed a low abundance of Qualea. The species of this genus are some of the most common in the vegetation of cerrado sensu stricto [31], showing a relatively high level of dominance in the sites where they are present [32]. Thus, the super-host taxa were not a good surrogate for galling insect diversity.

Sclerophyllous vegetation (on poor soils with little water) probably has more galling insect species per plant species than wetland vegetation [7]. Therefore, the number of plant species can increase to a greater level than galling insect richness [33]. Similarly, tropical regions have a high floristic diversity and host most of the galling insect species [7]. In these environments, the use of surrogates can be a useful tool for estimating galling insect richness and diversity patterns. Here, we also need to consider that other factors related to plant diversity could also be used as effective surrogates for galling insect richness, such as the size, density, architecture, and vegetation cover of taxa [12].

Implications for conservation

A large number of galling species has been described in recent decades [34] and estimates indicate that the number of species yet to be described could significantly exceed the number of known species [7]. The use of surrogates such as host plant richness seems to be a good tool for predicting galling insect richness and surveys using this approach could obtain relevant quantitative and qualitative results for the selection of priority areas for the conservation of galling insects.

Acknowledgments

I am very grateful to A. Estrada, E. D. Porfírio-Júnior and N. Coelho and two anonymous reviewers for suggestions; and to Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for the scholarship grant.

References

1.

Shorthouse, J.D., Wool, D., , and Raman, A., 2005. Gall-inducing insects – Nature's most sophisticated herbivores. Basic and Applied Ecology 6:407–411. Google Scholar

2.

Stone, G.N., and Schönrogge, K., 2003. The adaptive significance of insect gall morphology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:512–522. Google Scholar

3.

Price, P.W., 2002. Resource-driven terrestrial interaction webs. Ecological Research 17:241–247. Google Scholar

4.

Price, P.W., Fernandes, G.W., and Waring, G.L., 1987. Adaptive nature of insect galls. Environmental Entomology 16:15–24. Google Scholar

5.

Bailey, R., Schönrogge, K., Cook, J.M., Melika, G., Csóka, G., Thuróczy, C., and Stone, G.N., 2009. Host niches and defensive extended phenotypes structure parasitoid wasp communities. PLoS Biology 7: e1000179. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000179 Google Scholar

6.

Price, P.W., 2005. Adaptative radiation of gall-inducing insects. Basic and Applied Ecology 6:413–421. Google Scholar

7.

Espírito-Santo, M.M., and Fernandes, G.W., 2007. How many species of gall-inducing insects are there on Earth and where are they? Annals of the Entomological Society of America 100:95–99. Google Scholar

8.

Godfray, H.C.J., Lewis, O.T., and Memmott, J., 1999. Studying insect diversity in the tropics. Philosofical Transactions of Royal Society of London B 354:1811–1824. Google Scholar

9.

Carmel, Y., and Stoller-Cavari, L., 2006. Comparing environmental and biological surrogates for diversity at a local scale. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 52:11–27. Google Scholar

10.

Oyama, K., Pérez-Pérez, M.A., Cuevas-Reyes, P., and Luna-Reyes, R., 2003. Regional and local species richness of gall-inducing insects in two tropical rain forests in Mexico. Journal of Tropical Ecology 19:595–598. Google Scholar

11.

Mendonça, M.S., 2007. Plant diversity and galling arthropod diversity - searching for taxonomic patterns in an animal-plant interaction in the Neotropics. Boletin de la Sociedad Argentina de Botanica 42:347–357. Google Scholar

12.

Araújo, W.S., 2011. Size, age and composition: characteristics of plant taxa as predictors of the diversity of gall-midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Revista de Biología Tropical 59:1599–1607. Google Scholar

13.

Cuevas-Reyes, P., Siebe, C., Martínez-Ramos, M., and Oyama, K., 2003. Species richness of gall-forming insects in a tropical rain forest: correlations with plant diversity and soil fertility. Biodiversity and Conservation 12:411–422. Google Scholar

14.

Veldtman, R., and McGeoch, M.A., 2003. Gall-forming insect species richness along a non-scleromorphic vegetation rainfall gradient in South Africa: the importance of plant community composition. Austral Ecology 28:11–13. Google Scholar

15.

Ribeiro, J.F., and Walter, B.M.T., 1998. Fitofisionomias do bioma Cerrado. In: Cerrado: ambiente e flora.Sano, S.M., and Almeida, S.P., (Eds.), pp.89–168. Embrapa/CPAC, Brasília. Google Scholar

16.

Abrahamson, W.G., Melika, G., Scrafford, R., and Csóka, G., 1998. Gall-inducing insects provide insights into plant systematic relationships. American Journal of Botany 85:1159–1165. Google Scholar

17.

Carneiro, M.A.A., Branco, C.S.A., Braga, C.E.D., Almada, E.D., Costa, M.B.M., Maia, V.C., and Fernandes, G.W., 2009. Are gall midge species (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) host-plant specialists? Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 53:365–378. Google Scholar

18.

Mendonça, R.C., Felfili, J.M., Walter, B.M.T., Silva-Júnior, M.C., Rezende, A.V., Filgueiras, T.S., and Nogueira, P.E., 1998. Flora vascular do Cerrado. In: Cerrado: ambiente e flora.Sano, S.M., and Almeida, S.P., (Eds.), pp.289–556. Embrapa/CPAC, Brasília. Google Scholar

19.

Gonçalves-Alvim, S.J., Lana, T.C., Ranieri, B.D., Silveira, F.A.O., Ribeiro, V., and Fernandes, G.W.F., 2010. Growth, defense and herbivory on young leaves of Qualea parviflora (Vochysiaceae) in three different Cerrado habitats. Neotropical Biology and Conservation 5:86–92. Google Scholar

20.

Gonçalves-Alvim, S.J., and Fernandes, G.W., 2001. Comunidades de insetos galhadores (Insecta) em diferentes fisionomias do cerrado em Minas Gerais, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 18:289–305. Google Scholar

21.

Lawton, J.H., 1983. Plant architecture and the diversity of phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 28:23–39. Google Scholar

22.

Cuevas-Reyes, P., Quesada, M., Hanson, P., Dirzo, R., and Oyama, K., 2004. Diversity of gall-inducing insects in a Mexican tropical dry forest: the importance of plant species richness, life-forms, host plant age and plant density. Journal of Ecology 92:707–716. Google Scholar

23.

Dalbem, R.V., and Mendonça, M.S., 2006. Diversity of galling arthropods and host plants in a subtropical forest of Porto Alegre, Southern Brazil. Neotropical Entomology 35:616–624. Google Scholar

24.

Margules, C.R., and Pressey, R.L., 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253. Google Scholar

25.

Blanche, K.R., 2000. Diversity of insect-induced galls along a temperature-rainfall gradient in the tropical savannah region of the Northern Territory, Australia. Austral Ecology 25:311–318. Google Scholar

26.

Lara, A.C.F., Fernandes, G.W., and Gonçalves-Alvim, S.J., 2002. Tests of hypotheses on patterns of gall distribution along an altitudinal gradient. Tropical Zoology 15:219–232. Google Scholar

27.

Fleck, T., and Fonseca, C.R., 2007. Hipóteses sobre a riqueza de insetos galhadores: uma revisão considerando os níveis intra-específico, interespecífico e de comunidade. Neotropical Biology and Conservation 2:36–45. Google Scholar

28.

Bräuniger, C., Knapp, S., Kühn, I., and Klotz, S., 2010. Testing taxonomic and landscape surrogates for diversity in an urban setting. Landscape and Urban Planning 97:283–295. Google Scholar

29.

Anderson, A., McCormack, S., Helden, A., Sheridan, H., Kinsella, A., and Purvis, G., 2010. The potential of parasitoid Hymenoptera as bioindicators of arthropod diversity in agricultural grasslands. Journal of Applied Ecology 48:382–390. Google Scholar

30.

Garson, J., Aggarwal, A., and Sarkar, S., 2002. Birds as surrogates for biodiversity: an analysis of a data set from southern Québec. Journal of Bioscience 27:347–360. Google Scholar

31.

Silva-Júnior, M.C., 2005. 100 Árvores do Cerrado – guia de campo. Rede de Sementes do Cerrado, Brasília. Google Scholar

32.

Felfili, J.M., Silva-Júnior, M.C., Sevilha, A.C., Fagg, C.W., Walter, B.M.T., Nogueira, P.E., and Rezende, A.V., 2004. Diversity, floristic and structural patterns of cerrado vegetation in Central Brazil. Plant Ecology 175:37–46. Google Scholar

33.

Wright, M.G., and Samways, M.J., 1998. Insect species richness tracking plant species richness in a diverse flora: gall-insects in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Oecologia 115:427–433. Google Scholar

34.

Gagné, R.J., 2010. Update for a catalog of the Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) of the world. Digital version 1. Google Scholar
© 2011 Walter Santos de Araújo. This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ - The license permits any user to download, print out, extract, archive, and distribute the article, so long as appropriate credit is given to the authors and source of the work. The license ensures that the published article will be as widely available as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific archive. Open Access authors retain the copyrights of their papers. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers.
Walter Santos de Araújo "Can host plant richness be used as a surrogate for galling insect diversity?," Tropical Conservation Science 4(4), 420-427, (12 December 2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291100400405
Received: 5 May 2011; Accepted: 27 September 2011; Published: 12 December 2011
KEYWORDS
Cerrado
galls
indicator groups
Plant richness
super-host taxa
Back to Top