We believe that communication within and among agency personnel in the United States and Canada about the successes and failures of their human–bear (Ursidae) management programs will increase the effectiveness of these programs and of bear research. To communicate more effectively, we suggest agencies clearly define terms and concepts used in human–bear management and use them in a consistent manner. We constructed a human–bear management lexicon of terms and concepts using a modified Delphi method to provide a resource that facilitates more effective communication among human–bear management agencies. Specifically, we defined 40 terms and concepts in human–bear management and suggest definitions based on discussions with 13 other professionals from the United States and Canada. Although new terms and concepts will emerge in the future and definitions will evolve as we learn more about bear behavior and ecology, our purpose is to suggest working definitions for terms and concepts to help guide human–bear management and research activities in North America. Applications or revisions of these definitions may be useful outside of North America.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 November 2010
A proposed lexicon of terms and concepts for human–bear management in North America
John B. Hopkins,
Stephen Herrero,
Richard T. Shideler,
Kerry A. Gunther,
Charles C. Schwartz,
Steven T. Kalinowski
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
Ursus
Vol. 21 • No. 2
November 2010
Vol. 21 • No. 2
November 2010
bear incidents
definitions
food conditioning
habituation
human–bear conflict
human–bear interactions
human–bear management