Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2011 Discovery of Important Postbreeding Sites for Barrow's Goldeneye in the Boreal Transition Zone of Alberta
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Sites where Barrow's Goldeneye (Bucephala islandica) undergo remigial molt and fall staging are poorly known, with only two major sites documented in Alaska and the Yukon Territory. Satellite telemetry, aerial surveys and ground surveys were used to identify previously unknown molting and fall staging areas in the Boreal Transition Zone (BTZ) of northern Alberta. Of 816 wetlands surveyed between 2004 and 2006 in the BTZ, 40–45% (105–127 lakes annually) had molting goldeneyes. Of these, 1.3–3.3% were used by large aggregations of goldeneyes (>100 birds). Two wetlands, Cardinal and Leddy Lakes, were particularly important, with an estimated 5,000–7,000 Barrow's Goldeneyes, primarily adult males, using these sites during remigial molt and fall staging. Birds used these sites up to five months or over one-third of their annual cycle. Half of adult males marked with satellite transmitters at a breeding area in interior British Columbia used Cardinal Lake for postbreeding activities. Discovery of these sites represents some of the largest concentrations of molting Barrow's Goldeneyes in North America, and the only major molting sites currently known for the intermountain breeding portion of the western population. Protection of Cardinal and Leddy Lakes, and other significant molting and staging sites within the BTZ, should be a priority conservation effort for this species.

Waterfowl (Anatidae) undergo a complete and simultaneous remigial molt, which typically renders individuals flightless for 20 – 40 days (Hohman et al. 1992). A wide range of behavioral and physiological adaptations have been described to accommodate risks and constraints associated with flightlessness and costs of feather synthesis including: reduced activity (Panek and Majewski 1990; Adams 2000), modified and/or selective foraging behavior (Ankney 1979; Owen and Ogilvie 1979; Murphy and King 1987), and reduction or redistribution of body mass and nutrient reserves (Thompson and Drobney 1996; Brown and Saunders 1998). Choice of an appropriate molt site is presumably important to reduce risks associated with simultaneous remigial molt.

Following the breeding season, waterfowl in the northern hemisphere often migrate to specific molt sites, which may be well outside of their core breeding range (Salomonsen 1968). Molt migration likely provides important benefits, including access to larger and more drought resistant wetlands, reduced human disturbance, abundant food and low predator densities relative to breeding areas (Zicus 1981; Derksen et al. 1982; Madsen and Mortensen 1987).

Identification of molting sites has important conservation implications. First, because molting waterfowl tend to be highly congregated at relatively few sites, each site may support a significant proportion of a population. Second, because molting waterfowl are flightless, they are susceptible to human disturbance or catastrophic events, so protection of these sites from potentially negative anthropogenic influences is important. Third, some waterfowl species also use their molting sites during fall staging, remaining on the same wetland system for onethird or more of their annual cycle (Gilliland et al. 2002; Savard et al. 2007; Oppel et al. 2008). Finally, by documenting areas used by large aggregations of molting birds, characteristics of molt sites can be determined and those attributes used to identify other potential sites to survey and monitor. Despite the importance of molt site identification for waterfowl conservation, there are many species for which this information is not available. In particular, this is true for sea ducks (Mergini), many of which have shown long-term and broad-scale population declines. Significant effort is currently being directed at understanding when and where bottlenecks in the annual cycle of these species may occur (Sea Duck Joint Venture Management Board 2008).

To date, only two major molting sites of Barrow's Goldeneyes (Bucephala islandica) have been identified in western North America: Ohtig Lake, Alaska supporting around 5,000 molting birds (King 1963) and Old Crow Flats, Yukon Territory supporting approximately 7,000 molting birds, primarily males (Van de Wetering 1997). Numbers of Barrow's Goldeneye in western North America have been estimated between >125,000 (Bellrose 1980) and <200,000 (Eadie et al. 2000) so molting areas for the majority of these birds have not been determined, particularly for those that occur in more southern parts of their breeding and wintering ranges (e.g. British Columbia and Washington). Based on evidence from aerial and ground surveys, satellite telemetry and captures of molting individuals, we document the discovery of previously unrecognized molting sites for Barrow's Goldeneyes in the Boreal Transition Zone (BTZ) of Alberta.

METHODS

Study Area

The Boreal Transition Zone (BTZ) of western Canada extends from southeastern Manitoba through northwestern Alberta to the Rocky Mountains. A rapidly changing region, the BTZ includes the southern tier of ecoregions in the Boreal Plain ecozone which was historically comprised of mixed boreal forest and native grasslands, interspersed with abundant wetlands and lakes. The BTZ is increasingly being converted to agriculture and other land uses (Hobson et al. 2002; Epners et al. 2010). Cardinal Lake (56°14′N, 117°44′W), also referred to as Lac Cardinal, is a large (50 km2) shallow lake located in the BTZ of northwestern Alberta. The basin rarely exceeds a depth of 2 m, has a primarily sand and gravel bottom, and is hypereutrophic. Leddy Lake is a small (4 km2), open fen located approximately 25 km NE of Cardinal Lake. The basin is shallow (<2 m), with a primarily muddy substrate, dense submerged vegetation mat throughout most of the lake, and is mesotrophic.

Aerial Surveys

Fixed-wing aerial surveys were conducted over 59,200 km2 of the Boreal Transition Zone of Alberta from 2004 to 2006 (Fig. 1). In the absence of detailed wetland inventory data, these surveys were focused in pre-established blocks within the BTZ landscape that had relatively high wetland densities based on analysis of digital versions of 1:50,000 scale National Topographic Survey (NTS) maps. Each basin visible on the 1:50,000 NTS map within the survey blocks (Fig. 1) was completely surveyed at least three times from mid-July through late August. Surveys were conducted at least one week apart to help account for interspecific variation in timing of remigial molt. Additionally, most sites heavily used by waterfowl were surveyed during more than one year to better understand annual variation in use. While timing of these surveys coincided almost perfectly with the early-July through mid-September timing of remigial molt for Barrow's Goldeneyes documented in the Yukon (Van de Wetering and Cooke 2000), they were designed to document broad-scale waterfowl use of the region and did not specifically target any species. Further, because of difficulties differentiating Barrow's and Common Goldeneyes (Bucephala clangula) during aerial surveys, observed individuals of both species were recorded as “goldeneyes”. However, site-specific ground surveys were subsequently conducted at several wetlands and were used to estimate the proportion of each species present.

Because only wetlands visible on a 1:50,000 scale NTS map were surveyed, not all suitable molting habitats were included in the surveys. Furthermore, deeper, fish-bearing lakes were excluded from these surveys given that they seldom provide significant molting habitat for waterfowl in the BTZ (Epners et al. 2010). Surveys included approximately 250 to 300 wetlands annually, including two shallow lakes that are particularly relevant to this paper: Cardinal Lake and Leddy Lake.

Satellite Telemetry

Adult male and female Barrow's Goldeneyes were captured and implanted with satellite transmitters (26 g or 38 g, Microwave Telemetry Inc.) at a breeding area and a wintering area in southern British Columbia. The breeding area, near Riske Creek (52°5′N, 122°30′W), is comprised of numerous small, shallow wetlands and is recognized as a high-density breeding site for Barrow's Goldeneyes (Savard 1986; Thompson 1996; Evans 2003). In 2006–2008 we captured adult males during the breeding period (May) using a decoy and partially submerged mist net. Adult females were captured during the brood-rearing period in 2008 using drive traps. We implanted 20 adult males and nine adult females from the Riske Creek breeding area. On a coastal wintering site in Indian Arm, British Columbia (49°19′N, 122°55′W), we captured Barrow's Goldeneyes in February 2007 using floating mist nets and decoys (Kaiser et al. 1995). We implanted satellite transmitters into three adult males and five adult females. All transmitter implant surgeries were conducted by a certified veterinarian following standard procedures (Korschgen et al. 1996; Mulcahy and Esler 1999).

Figure 1.

Location of Boreal Transition Zone wetlands and shallow lakes in Alberta of particular importance to molting goldeneyes (ha; max count goldeneyes): 1. Leddy Lake (350 ha; 583), 2. Unnamed lake (58 ha; 103), 3. Cardinal Lake (5011 ha; 4,122), 4. Winagami Lake (4682 ha; 284), 5. Ray Lake (130 ha; 130), 6. Powell Lake (105 ha; 158), 7. Bush Lake (421 ha; 101), 8. Cutbank Lake (184 ha; 104), 9. Bear Lake (3217 ha; 483), 10. Sandhill Lake (445 ha; 266), 11. Tawakwato Lake (350 ha; 344), 12. Chip Lake (7471 ha; 2178), 13. Majeau Lake (1550 ha; 125), 14. George Lake (469 ha; 157). Sites were discovered through fixed-wing aerial surveys conducted from 2004–2006. Hatched areas on the figure indicate survey blocks with relatively high wetland densities that were surveyed during the molting period (mid-July through late August). Some molting sites occurred outside of larger survey landscapes, but were included based on evidence that they could be important to molting waterfowl.

f01_261.jpg

Signals from implanted transmitters were obtained from the Argos satellite data system (CLS America). Transmitters were set to automatically transmit locations for two to six hours every three to four days. We identified molt sites as locations where a bird remained for ≥40 days between 1 July-30 September for males and 1 August-30 September for females (Van de Wetering and Cooke 2000; D. Hogan unpublished data). In one case, a male migrated to Cardinal Lake and remained there for 13 days before its transmitter failed. We classified Cardinal Lake as the molt site for this individual because it was logical in relation to the timing and pattern of migration.

Intensive Ground Surveys

Based on previous observations from aerial surveys and data from satellite telemetry (see Results, below) suggesting that Cardinal Lake was an important molting and staging site for Barrow's Goldeneye, we conducted ground-based surveys to determine numbers and species composition of goldeneyes using Cardinal and Leddy Lakes. Weekly counts were conducted using spotting scopes throughout the molting and staging periods from early June to November in 2009 and 2010. The counts were conducted in twelve discreet segments located around Cardinal Lake. The segments were chosen to cover as much of the lake area as possible without overlap; some portions of the lake were not regularly surveyed due to difficult accessibility, but we confirmed on multiple occasions that they tended to have few birds (<100).

Despite relatively modest and sporadic use of Leddy Lake by Barrow's Goldeneyes from 2004 through 2006, a relatively large number of birds molted at this site in 2009 and this led to a ground survey program. Surveys were conducted from a single point on the shoreline using spotting scopes, which provided a view of most of the lake area. Total numbers of Barrow's Goldeneyes observed were recorded for each survey.

Age/Sex Ratios

We captured Barrow's Goldeneyes during remigial molt on both Cardinal and Leddy Lakes on 29 occasions in 2009 and 2010, using drive-trapping methods (Van de Wetering 1997). Age and sex ratios were derived from total counts of each cohort from the capture data for each year. Sex was determined by cloacal examination (Hochbaum 1942) and plumage characteristics (Carney 1983) and age class was indicated by bursal depth (Mather and Esler 1999). Age class was designated as either second-year (SY; i.e. one to two months beyond the first year after hatching, bursa >10 mm) or after-second-year (ASY, bursa ≤ 10 mm).

RESULTS

Aerial Surveys

A total of 816 wetlands were surveyed between 2004 and 2006 in the BTZ of Alberta. Of these, 40 to 45% of wetlands surveyed annually (105–127 lakes) had molting goldeneyes. However, only a small proportion of surveyed sites were used by large aggregations of goldeneyes (≥100 birds) in any given year (2004 = 1.3%, 2005 = 2.9%, 2006 = 3.3%). Of these few sites, Cardinal Lake consistently received the highest use with molting goldeneye counts ranging from 3,105 to 4,122 birds over the three years. Chip Lake, a large, shallow lake system in west-central Alberta consistently showed the second highest use by molting goldeneyes between 2004 and 2006. Leddy Lake goldeneye counts were the third highest in two of the three years, and ranged from 96 to 568 (Table 1).

Concurrent ground surveys of goldeneyes at Cardinal and Leddy Lakes indicated that Barrow's Goldeneyes consistently comprised ≥90% of the total goldeneyes present during remigial molt. While not formally counted, ground observations at Chip Lake also suggested that the majority of goldeneyes using this site during remigial molt were Barrow's Goldeneyes (J. Thompson, personal observation).

Additional BTZ wetlands in Alberta that received use by ≥ 100 molting goldeneyes include George Lake, Majeau Lake, Powell Lake, Cutbank Lake, Bear Lake, Tawakwato Lake, Sandhill Lake, Winagami Lake, Ray Lake and Bush Lake (Fig. 1 ). While the productivity of these wetlands (i.e. eutrophic and hypereutrophic systems) suggests that they are likely more suitable molting sites for Barrow's than Common Goldeneyes (Eadie et al. 1995; Eadie et al. 2000), this has not been verified through ground surveys.

Satellite Telemetry

Of the 20 adult males marked with satellite transmitters at Riske Creek, six (30%) molted on Cardinal Lake and two of these birds molted there in consecutive years. The remaining 14 males molted over a large area within the boreal forest east of the Rocky Mountains, extending from Lesser Slave Lake, Alberta to Great Bear Lake, North West Territories. Four of these males staged or stopped at Cardinal Lake on their way to or from other molting sites, two of which stopped at Cardinal Lake in consecutive years, indicating that half of the males marked at an intermountain breeding site used Cardinal Lake at some point in their annual cycle. Of the nine adult females marked at Riske Creek, none molted at either Cardinal or Leddy Lakes, however two molted at nearby sites within the BTZ. The remaining females molted near breeding sites in southwestern BC.

Table 1.

Fixed-wing aerial survey counts of molting goldeneyes on Cardinal, Leddy, and Chip Lakes, AB 2004–2006. Estimates reflect the peak annual counts of goldeneyes at these sites over three molting surveys conducted each year. Concurrent ground surveys indicated ≥90% of goldeneyes on Cardinal and Leddy Lakes were Barrow's Goldeneyes (Bucephala islandica).

t01_261.gif

Of the three Indian Arm males marked with satellite transmitters, two birds molted on Cardinal Lake. One of five adult females marked at Indian Arm molted within the BTZ, east of Cardinal Lake. Three of the remaining females molted near breeding sites in southern BC, and one molted at a breeding site on the eastern slope of the Rocky Mountains.

Intensive Ground Surveys

Ground-based surveys conducted in 2009 during remigial molt provided maximum counts of 2,323 Barrow's Goldeneyes on Cardinal Lake and 1,855 on Leddy Lake. In 2010 a maximum of 6,060 and 730 Barrow's Goldeneyes were counted on these lakes, respectively. Peak fall staging counts of Barrow's Goldeneyes on Cardinal Lake were 1,224 and 5,238 in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Maximum fall staging counts on Leddy Lake were 820 and 220 in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Counts, particularly those from Cardinal Lake, should be treated as conservative estimates given that it is not possible to survey the entire lake from the ground, and ground surveys often provide low estimates of waterfowl abundance (Pagano and Arnold 2009a, 2009b).

Age/Sex Ratios

In 2009, we captured 277 and 305 Barrow's Goldeneyes on Cardinal and Leddy Lakes, respectively. Adult (ASY) males accounted for 85% of the captured individuals on each lake. In 2010, we captured 464 and 182 birds on Cardinal and Leddy Lakes respectively, of which 78% of Cardinal birds and 83% of Leddy birds were ASY males. Adult males were the primary cohort undergoing remigial molt on these lakes (Table 2).

DISCUSSION

Identification of postbreeding sites for Barrow's Goldeneye in the BTZ of Alberta increases knowledge of this species' post-reproductive ecology. In particular, Cardinal, Leddy and Chip Lakes represent three of only five major molting areas known for Barrow's Goldeneyes in western North America. Surveys indicated numbers of molting Barrow's Goldeneyes of a similar magnitude to those at Old Crow Flats, Yukon Territory and Ohtig Lake, Alaska (King 1963; Van de Wetering 1997). Cardinal Lake is also the first known molting site for Barrow's Goldeneyes that breed in the intermountain region of British Columbia. Birds that breed and winter in BC could account for 60% of the world population of Barrow's Goldeneyes (Eadie et al. 2000). A high proportion of satellite marked, breeding males from Riske Creek, BC molted and/or staged at Cardinal Lake (50%), despite the presence of numerous alternative lake systems within the BTZ. Satellite telemetry indicated that some breeding females from Riske Creek also utilized the BTZ of Alberta for postbreeding activities. Chip and Leddy Lakes are also likely important molting sites for birds breeding in the interior of British Columbia. The long distances (>500 km) that these birds travelled in the opposite direction of their Pacific coast wintering regions suggests that these BTZ sites possess characteristics that are attractive to molting Barrow's Goldeneye, and that these may be relatively uncommon.

Table 2.

Proportion (%) of captured molting Barrow's Goldeneyes (Bucephala islandica) in each age and sex cohort on Cardinal Lake and Leddy Lake, AB in 2009 and 2010.

t02_261.gif

Characteristics of Cardinal, Leddy, and Chip Lakes are similar to those of previously known molting sites at Ohtig Lake and Old Crow Flats. All of these areas consist of large, shallow wetlands with abundant submergent vegetation. Each of these sites is also highly productive, supporting a large number of molting and fall staging waterfowl (King 1963; Van de Wetering and Cooke 2000). Similar molting habitat has been described for Barrow's Goldeneyes in northern Iceland at Lake Myvatn, although birds in this area also molted on a productive stretch of the Laxa River (Einarsson and Gardarsson 2004). Some males in eastern North America have been observed molting in coastal estuaries (Robert et al. 2002) however this behavior has not been observed for the western population. The similarity of water bodies used by molting Barrow's Goldeneyes suggests that birds are targeting a suite of specific habitat characteristics when choosing a molting location. While Cardinal, Leddy, and Chip Lakes appear to satisfy these preferences and represent sound foci for conservation efforts, further work should be undertaken to investigate other wetlands in the BTZ that supported significant numbers of molting goldeneyes (Fig. 1). Observed variability in survey counts of molting and staging birds between years suggests that individuals may not use the same location each year. Given that several males marked at Riske Creek molted on other wetlands in the BTZ, it is likely that this landscape provides a number of suitable molting locations, and efforts should be made to locate and protect these sites.

The relatively small number of known molting sites for Barrow's Goldeneyes highlights the importance of conserving these sites. Many waterfowl species, Barrow's Goldeneye included, often remain at molting sites during fall staging, building energy reserves for migration to wintering habitats (Petersen et al. 2006; Savard et al. 2007; Savard et al. 2008). Data from Cardinal and Leddy Lakes indicate that Barrow's Goldeneyes are using these sites for up to five months. Similar patterns occur at molting sites in eastern Canada (Robert et al. 2002). Thus, quality of a molting/staging site may not only affect the quality of plumage grown, which affects thermoregulatory efficiency (Stettenheim 1976), but may also have crossseasonal effects on individual fitness at subsequent stages of the annual cycle. Molting/ staging habitat quality could indirectly affect reproductive success of Barrow's Goldeneyes six months later. Conserving these habitats may be particularly important considering the high rate of agricultural expansion within the BTZ (Mills 1994; Hobson et al. 2002) and the paucity of protected areas within this region.

Energy development is an additional threat in the BTZ that could directly affect postbreeding goldeneyes. Construction of large-scale nuclear power facilities in the region could result in fundamental changes to the ecology and hydrology of this system that would likely deter use of this site by postbreeding waterfowl. Currently, several sites in the vicinity of Cardinal and Leddy Lakes are under consideration for construction of western Canada's first nuclear power plant (Bruce Power 2009). Initial construction proposals considered the possibility of converting Cardinal Lake into a cooling pond for multiple nuclear reactors. Potential effects of this project or future developments proposed for this region should be carefully evaluated in advance of construction to understand their potential impacts to postbreeding Barrow's Goldeneye, one of the least abundant sea ducks in North America.

Given the potential importance of molting and fall staging habitat for waterfowl population dynamics, identification and protection of postbreeding sites should be a priority. Wetlands and shallow lakes in Alberta's BTZ, in particular Cardinal, Leddy, and Chip Lakes, provide molting and fall staging habitat for a significant proportion of the Pacific population of Barrow's Goldeneyes. To our knowledge, the aggregations described at these sites are among the highest densities of this species recorded in North America during any stage of the annual cycle. Discovery of these sites has provided the opportunity for more extensive research on the ecology of this species during the post-reproductive stages of the annual cycle. Ongoing work is focusing on understanding molting and fall staging phenology, survival and movements, as well as physiological and behavioral strategies employed during remigial molt and fall staging. These data will lead to a more complete understanding of how Barrow's Goldeneyes use postbreeding habitats, potentially lead to identification of other important molting sites in the BTZ and further aid development of conservation strategies for this species.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Financial support was provided by Ducks Unlimited Canada, the Sea Duck Joint Venture, Alberta North American Waterfowl Management Plan Partnership, Alberta Conservation Association, Environment Canada, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) and Simon Fraser University. Data collection was assisted by R. Dickson, R. Hermanutz, J. and E. Jaschke and family, J. McDonald, M. Merriam, T. Morgan, A. Olsen, J. Olsen, E. Palm, J. Pierce, M. Ranger, G. Raven and CWS banding crews, R. Stavne, K. Tangen, B. Uher-Koch, C. Van Stratt, M. Wilson and C. Wohl. M. McAdie performed satellite transmitter implants. J. Barrett performed analyses of ARGOS data. S. Dunn provided mapping services. Thanks to two anonymous reviewers for comments.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. P. A. Adams 2000. Time-activity budgets of Harlequin Ducks molting in the Gannet Islands, Labrador. Condor 102: 703–708. Google Scholar

  2. C. D. Ankney 1979. Does the wing molt cause nutritional stress in Lesser Snow Geese? Auk: 96: 68–72. Google Scholar

  3. F. C. Bellrose 1980. Ducks, geese and swans of North America, 3rd edition. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Google Scholar

  4. R. E. Brown and D. K. Saunders . 1998. Regulated changes in body mass and muscle mass in molting Blue-winged Teal for an early return to flight. Canadian Journal of Zoology 76: 26–32. Google Scholar

  5. Bruce Power . 2009. Peace region nuclear power plant project.  http://www.brucepower.com/uc/GetDocument.aspx?docid=2866, accessed 10 January 2011. Google Scholar

  6. S. M. Carney 1983. Age, and sex identification of nearctic goldeneyes from wings. Journal of Wildlife Management 47: 754–761. Google Scholar

  7. D. V. Derksen , W. D. Eldridge and M. W. Weller . 1982. Habitat ecology of Pacific Black Brant and other geese moulting near Teshekpuk Lake, Alaska. Wildfowl 33: 39–57. Google Scholar

  8. J. M. Eadie , M. L. Mallory and H. G. Lumsden . 1995. Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula in The Birds of North America Online ( A. Poole , Ed.). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. Google Scholar

  9. J. M. Eadie , J.-P. L. Savard and M. L. Mallory . 2000. Barrow's Goldeneye Bucephala islandica in The Birds of North America Online ( A. Poole , Ed.). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. Google Scholar

  10. A. Einarsson and A. Gardarsson . 2004. Moulting diving ducks and their food supply. Aquatic Ecology 38: 297–307. Google Scholar

  11. C. A. Epners , S. E. Bayley , J. E. Thompson and W. M. Tonn . 2010. Influence of fish assemblages and shallow lake productivity on waterfowl communities in the Boreal Transition Zone of western Alberta. Freshwater Biology 55: 2265–2280. Google Scholar

  12. M. Evans 2003. Breeding habitat selection by Barrow's Goldeneye and Bufflehead in the Cariboo-Chilcotin region of British Columbia: nest sites, brood-rearing habitat, and competition. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia. Google Scholar

  13. S. G. Gilliland , G. J. Robertson , M. Robert , J.-P. L. Savard , D. Amirault , P. Laporte and P. Lamothe . 2002. Abundance and distribution of Harlequin Ducks molting in eastern Canada. Waterbirds 25: 333–339. Google Scholar

  14. K. A. Hobson , E. M. Bayne and S. L. Van Wilgenburg . 2002. Large-scale conversion of forest to agriculture in the Boreal Plains of Saskatchewan. Conservation Biology 16: 1530–1541. Google Scholar

  15. H. A. Hochbaum 1942. Sex and age determination of waterfowl by cloacal examination. Transactions of the North America Wildlife Conference 7: 299–307. Google Scholar

  16. W. L. Hohman , C. D. Ankney and D. H. Gordon . 1992. Ecology and management of postbreeding waterfowl. Pages 128–189 in Ecology and management of breeding waterfowl ( B. D. J. Batt , A. D. Afton , M. G. Anderson , C. D. Ankney , D. H. Johnson , J. A. Kadlec and G. L. Krapu , Eds.). University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Google Scholar

  17. G. W. Kaiser , A. E. Derosher , S. Crawford , M. J. Gill and I. A. Manley . 1995. A capture method for Marbled Murrelets in coastal inlets. Journal of Field Ornithology 66: 321–456. Google Scholar

  18. J. G. King 1963. Duck banding in arctic Alaska. Journal of Wildlife Management 27: 356–362. Google Scholar

  19. C. E. Korschgen , K. P. Kenow , A. Genron-Fitzpatrick , W. L. Green and F. J. Dein . 1996. Implanting intra-abdominal radio transmitters with external whip antenna in ducks. Journal of Wildlife Management 60: 132–137. Google Scholar

  20. J. Madsen and C. E. Mortensen . 1987. Habitat exploitation and interspecific competition of moulting geese in east Greenland. Ibis 129: 25–44. Google Scholar

  21. D. D. Mather and D. Esler . 1999. Evaluation of bursal depth as an indicator of age class of Harlequin Ducks. Journal of Field Ornithology 70: 200–205. Google Scholar

  22. P. F. Mills 1994. The agricultural potential of northwestern Canada and Alaska and the impact of climate change. Arctic 47: 115–123. Google Scholar

  23. D. M. Mulcahy and D. Esler . 1999. Surgical and immediate postrelease mortality of Harlequin Ducks Histrionicus histrionicus implanted with abdominal radio transmitters with percutaneous antennae. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 30: 397–401. Google Scholar

  24. M. E. Murphy and J. R. King . 1987. Dietary discrimination by molting White-Crowned Sparrows given diets differing only in sulfur amino acid concentration. Physiological Zoology 60: 279–289. Google Scholar

  25. S. Oppel , A. B. Powell and D. L. Dickson . 2008. Timing and distribution of King Eider migration and winter movements. Condor 110: 296–305. Google Scholar

  26. M. Owen and M. A. Ogilvie . 1979. Wing moult and weights of Barnacle Geese in Spitsbergen. Condor 81: 42–52. Google Scholar

  27. A. M. Pagano and T. W. Arnold . 2009a. Detection probabilities for ground-based surveys of breeding waterfowl surveys. Journal of Wildlife Management 73: 392–398. Google Scholar

  28. A. M. Pagano and T. W. Arnold . 2009b. Estimating detection probabilities of waterfowl broods from ground-based surveys. Journal of Wildlife Management 73: 686–694. Google Scholar

  29. M. Panek and P. Majewski . 1990. Remex growth and body mass of Mallards during wing molt. Auk 107: 225–259. Google Scholar

  30. M. R. Petersen , O. J. Bustnes and G. H. Systad . 2006. Breeding and moulting locations and migration patterns of the Atlantic population of Steller's Eiders Polysticta stelleri as determined from satellite telemetry. Journal of Avian Biology 37: 58–68. Google Scholar

  31. M. Robert , R. Benoit and J.-P. L. Savard . 2002. Relationship among breeding, molting, and wintering areas of male Barrow's Goldeneyes Bucephala islandica in eastern North America. Auk 119: 676–684. Google Scholar

  32. F. Salomonsen 1968. The moult migration. Wildfowl 19: 5–24. Google Scholar

  33. J.-P. L. Savard 1986. Territorial behaviour, nesting success, and brood survival in Barrow's Goldeneyes and its congeners. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia. Google Scholar

  34. J.-P. L. Savard , M. Robert and S. Brodeur . 2008. Harlequin ducks in Quebec. Waterbirds 31: 19–31. Google Scholar

  35. J.-P. L. Savard , A. Reed and L. Lesage . 2007. Chronology of breeding and molt migration in Surf Scoters Melanitta perspicillata. Waterbirds 30: 223–229. Google Scholar

  36. Sea Duck Joint Venture Management Board. 2008. Sea Duck Joint Venture Strategic Plan 2008–2012. US fish and Wildlife, Anchorage, Alaska; Canadian Wildlife Service, Sackville, New Brunswick. Google Scholar

  37. P. Stettenheim 1976. Structural adaptations in feathers. Pages 385–401 in Proceedings of the 16th International Ornithological Congress ( H. J. Firth and J. H. Calaby , Eds.). Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, Australia. Google Scholar

  38. J. E. Thompson 1996. Comparative reproductive ecology of female Buffleheads Bucephala albeola and Barrow's Goldeneyes Buscephala islandica in central British Columbia. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario. Google Scholar

  39. J. E. Thompson , and R. D. Drobney . 1996. Nutritional implications of molt in male Canvasbacks: variation in nutrient reserves and digestive tract morphology. Condor 98: 512–526. Google Scholar

  40. D. E. Van de Wetering 1997. Moult characteristics and habitat selection of postbreeding male Barrow's Goldeneye Bucephala islandica in northern Yukon. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia. Google Scholar

  41. D. E. Van de Wetering and F. Cooke . 2000. Body weight and feather growth of male Barrow's Goldeneye during wing molt. Condor 102: 228–231. Google Scholar

  42. M. C. Zicus 1981. Molt migration of Canada Geese from Crex Meadows, Wisconsin. Journal of Wildlife Management 45: 54–63. Google Scholar

Danica Hogan, Jonathan E. Thompson, Daniel Esler, and W. Sean Boyd "Discovery of Important Postbreeding Sites for Barrow's Goldeneye in the Boreal Transition Zone of Alberta," Waterbirds 34(3), (1 September 2011). https://doi.org/10.1675/063.034.0301
Received: 29 March 2011; Accepted: 1 May 2011; Published: 1 September 2011
JOURNAL ARTICLE
128 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top