Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2015 Diversity, Abundance and Nesting Phenology of the Wading Birds of Bahía Kino, Sonora, México
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The occurrence and nesting phenology of Ardeidae species and other wading birds were documented from 2009–2013 in the Bahía Kino bioregion of western Sonora, México. Two active colonies were surveyed: in a mangrove (Avicennia germinans; Rhizophora mangle) estuary and on a nearshore desert island. Thirteen species of nesting wading birds were recorded, 11 of which are year-round residents and two occurring only during the breeding season; two additional species were documented only in migration. The most abundant species was the Snowy Egret (Egretta thula), which had a peak of 234 nests in 2012. Of particular conservation interest is the Reddish Egret (E. rufescens), which had a peak of 149 nests in 2012. Potential prey of wading birds in the estuary was also sampled, with special focus on brachyuran crabs, which constitute the main prey items of the Yellow-crowned Night-Heron (Nyctanassa violacea). The rapid development of the region, and especially the establishment of largescale mariculture operations along Estero Santa Cruz, has the potential to impact local wading bird populations, and thus an understanding of wading bird diversity, abundance and habitat use may prove critical to inform future management and conservation initiatives.

Wading bird populations constitute an ecologically important component of the avifauna of the coastal wetlands of the Gulf of California. Located on the east coast of the Gulf, Bahía Kino is classified as the Central Gulf Coast Subdivision of the Sonoran Desert (Turner and Brown 1982; Rebinan and Roberts 2012) and is notable for its high avian biodiversity attributable, in part, to the close juxtaposition of marine, desert, mangrove (Avicennia germinans; Rhizophora mangle) and island ecosystems. In addition, Bahía Kino's location in the Midriff Island region of the Gulf of California derives benefits from consistent, strong offshore upwelling with associated high marine primary productivity. These ecological dynamics support large local colonies of seabirds, such as Double-crested Cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus; Pfister et al. 2005) and Brown Pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis:, Galván 2007), as well as relatively less common seabirds, including Craveri's Murrelet (Synthliboramphus craveri; Hurley and Blinick 2011), and dense aggregations of wintering shorebirds (Fleischner and Gates 2009).

Historically, Bahía Kino had been a small, quiet fishing village. However, the human population has more than doubled in the last 25 years, from 3,017 inhabitants in 1990 to 6,050 in 2010 (L. R. Meltzer, pers. commun.), and the beachfront properties north of the old village have been heavily developed and impacted by tourism. Furthermore, in the past few decades, shrimp aquaculture development has expanded dramatically in the eastern and southern portions of Estero Santa Cruz, with at least 20 installations totaling 4,603 ha of ponds surrounding the estuary (Comité de Sanidad Acuicola del Estado de Sonora 2014). Thus, in the face of growing environmental risks and anthropogenic disturbances, and to complement the previously mentioned studies of seabirds and shorebirds, there is a need for studies on wading bird diversity and abundance, as well as identification of foraging and nesting requirements in the wetlands and on nearshore islands. Here, we collate and summarize the results of 5 years of wading bird monitoring and discuss the ecological context that supports the wading bird avifauna.

Methods

Study Area

The study area was centered in Bahía Kino, Sonora (28° 49′ N, 111° 56′ W) (Fig. 1). Habitats included an estuary with associated mangrove stands, a nearshore island with desert scrub vegetation (mainly for nesting) and, to a lesser extent, the shallow coastal beaches along the Bay, as well as islands farther offshore.

Humedales de la Laguna La Cruz (Estero Santa Cruz; hereafter estero) was designated in 2013 as México's 139th Ramsar site (Ramsar Convention on Wetlands 2013). It is a 6,665-ha negative estuary located 0.5 km to the south of the town of Bahía Kino (28° 48′ N, 111˚ 54′W) (Fig. 1D). The mouth of the estero is 1.1 km wide and opens to the west-southwest into the Bay and the Gulf of California. It contains a complex network of channels that average 1.1 m in depth and reach a maximum depth of 5 m at the mouth (Grijalva-Chon et al. 1996). The habitats in the estero include extensive tidally inundated mudflats and sand flats; mangrove thickets and mangrove fringe communities, including black mangrove (Avicennia germinans) and red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle); and small islands with Sonoran Desert vegetation, including cardón (Pachycereus pringlei), teddy-bear cholla (Cylindropuntia bigelovii) and desert wolfberry (Lycium spp.). There is also extensive saltmarsh habitat dominated by various shrubs and grasses (e.g., Sporobolus) and saltgrasses (Distichalis sp.). Several barren salt flats form a patchwork within tire salt-marsh vegetation and are inundated only during high spring and storm tides in the summer months between May and September. “Heron Island” is located in a section of the estero that we monitored and is approximately 0.42 ha (Fig. 1E); it consists of a black mangrove thicket averaging 4 m tall (Fleishman and Blinick 2011).

Isla Alcatraz (also called Isla Pelícano, or Pelican Island) is a 59.5-ha volcanic island located 1.4 km offshore of the town of Bahía Kino (28° 48′ N, 111° 59′ W) (Fig. 1C). The highest peaks rise steeply to 135 m (Felger and Wilder 2012), which are flanked on the northeast by a gently sloping bajada with stands of desert scrub and cardón forest; this is the main nesting site of wading birds. A sandy beach stretches along the eastern shore, surrounded by rocky reefs that create a sheltered lagoon. At low tide an approximately 1.5-ha mudflat that provides foraging habitat for wading birds and shorebirds is exposed.

Field Methods

January surveys of the regional avifauna were reported by Fleischner and Riegner (1993) and have been updated annually through 2015. Although general monitoring of breeding, wintering and migratory waterbirds began in 2001, from 2009–2013 observations followed a consistent protocol and were systematically recorded year-round at least once a month throughout the entire study area. Surveys of the wading bird colony on Isla Alcatraz were conducted every 7–10 days for the entire duration of the nesting season from December through July. A minimum of bimonthly monitoring of the colony in Estero Santa Cruz was conducted September-June during each year of the 2009–2013 study period.

The Isla Alcatraz colony was initially split into four sections based on natural vegetative and topographic breaks to facilitate counting. Three stationary count locations were chosen based on good viewing of at least one section of the colony, achieving full colony coverage. Counts were made by scanning up and down, across each section, in sequence from southeast to northwest. Counts lasted 1–3 hr and were made from a distance of 100 m to minimize disturbance to the colony. For each species in each section of the colony, the total number of active nests was recorded.

For the Isla Alcatraz colony, the survey method remained more or less unchanged to maintain consistency, but some adjustments were made to reduce disturbance as the colony shifted spatially on the island. Two new sections were added, and counts were made from > 50 m from the edge of the shifted colony to minimize disturbance.

From 2009–2011, a medium to large colony of wading birds nested in a patch of black mangroves on the sand spit that extends along the northwest shore of Estero Santa Cruz (Figs. 1D, 1E). In an effort to minimize colony disturbance, we used the flight-line method (Erwin 1981; Paul and Paul 2004) to estimate species composition and nest abundance. Counts were conducted during low tides and when the majority of the colony was in the guard stage (i.e., when adults were incubating or brooding). Observations were made from atop a sand dune ~65 m from the edge of the colony.

Following Erwin (1981), counts began 2 hr after sunrise and lasted for 1 hr. All wading birds entering and leaving the colony were identified to species and recorded. Flight rate was calculated as FR = (Fin + Fout), where Fin is total flights into the colony and Fout is total flights out of the colony. Number of nests was estimated as N = FR x 1.5 (Paul and Paul 2004). Flight rate is not equivalent to number of nests but provides an index of the population size and offers a general estimate of the number of pairs when other methods are impractical, though, admittedly, this is a rough estimate (Sprandel 2009; Kushlan 2011). Two such surveys were conducted in both the 2009 and 2010 breeding seasons, and three in 2011. During the 2012–2013 seasons, the colony moved to a small black mangrove island (“Heron Island;” Fig. 1E). Direct counts of nests along the island's perimeter were made from a distance of 50 m.

To estimate categories of potentially available prey, in January 2013 and 2015, Estero Santa Cruz was sampled in an area commonly used by foraging herons. During both high and low tides, teams of students dragged a 6-m, fine-mesh seine net in shallow water to trap macroinver tebrates and small vertebrates; the captured organisms were placed in small glass laboratory bowls, identified, photographed and then released. Other teams dug in the muddy and sandy substrate and sifted the sediment in search of invertebrates; again, the animals were temporarily held in bowls, identified and then released. To estimate the abundance of large Mexican (or princely) fiddler crabs (Uca princeps), a 0.5-m2 frame was placed repeatedly within an extensive crab colony along a line transect at the base of the mangrove fringe; burrow entrances were then counted within the frame. In addition, Yellow-crowned Night-Heron (scientific names are given in Table 1) diet has been studied in the estero since 1989 by examining regurgitated food pellets and other discarded indigestible parts of prey (mostly crab chelipeds) at roosts and subsequently identifying samples to species (using keys in Brusca 1980).

Figure 1.

Map of the (A) region highlighting (B) Bahía Kino, (C) Isla Alcatraz, (D) Estero Santa Cruz and (E) the location of the mainland mangrove colony and Heron Island. In (C), hatched areas indicate the six sections that were surveyed.

f01_355.jpg

Results

Eight species of herons (Table 1) and White Ibises occurred regularly in the estero in all four seasons (Table 1); five of these species were always present in suitable habitat throughout the year. The mangrove habitat was used by 100% of species (for feeding and nesting), while the nearshore island habitat was used by 73% of species (mostly only for nesting). Four species were also observed on sandy beaches, and two species were documented in the town of Bahía Kino.

Least Bitterns were occasionally heard vocalizing (“cooing” call from Gibbs et al. 2009) in the mangroves of Estero Santa Cruz during the spring and early summer. The earliest seasonal date we recorded them was 3 April 2014 when a pair was seen; their distinctive call was heard through the end of June 2009, 2011 and 2014. Although no nests have been found, the observation of Least Bitterns and their call being heard during the breeding season are indicative of nesting.

Table 1.

Habitat and seasonal abundance estimates of herons (and other wading birds) in the Bahía Kino bioregion (based on field records 1989–2015). Habitat codes are: B = Beach/Nearshore (beach out to 0.5 km from shore); H = Human habitation (in town), including agricultural sites; I = Islands (nearshore); M = Mangrove estuary. The estimated abundance categories are as follows: c = common: always present in suitable habitat (often > 15 sightings/ year); f = fairly common: regularly found in suitable habitat (11–15 sightings/year); u = uncommon: present in suitable habitat, but not regularly seen (5–10 sightings/year); r = rare: rarely seen even in suitable habitat (< 5 sightings/ year); * = accidental: sight record in region, but out of typical range (usually 1 sighting/year). Winter = DecemberFebruary; Spring = March-May; Summer = June-August; Fall = September-November.

t01_355.gif

Seven species of herons, plus White Ibises, occurred in the colony on Isla Alcatraz (Table 2). Great Blue Herons are resident year-round in varying numbers, with the majority of individuals arriving in early December. Great Blue Herons are the first species to begin breeding, followed by Reddish Egrets in early March; the remaining herons (except Cattle Egrets) and White Ibises began breeding in early April (Fig. 2). Direct counts of nests on Isla Alcatraz showed large intraspecific fluctuations in abundance from year to year, and month of peak nesting activity within species also varied (Table 2). The most abundant species were Snowy Egrets, which had 234 active nests in 2012. One of the most consistent species was the Great Blue Heron, which had an average of 48.2 active nests/season (SD = 8.9; Table 2). Of particular conservation interest are Reddish Egrets, which nested in large numbers on Isla Alcatraz; in 2012, 149 active nests (x = 92.6; SD = 41.9; Table 2) were observed.

Table 2.

Annual seasonal high count of active nests (month in parentheses) on Isla Alcatraz 2009–2013.

t02_355.gif

In Estero Santa Cruz, flight-rates and estimates of number of nests were calculated for 12 species of wading birds for each survey undertaken from 2009–2011 (Table 3); in 2012 and 2013, direct counts were possible. The estimated number of nests for each species varied greatly across years; the most abundant species, Snowy Egrets, had an estimated 216 nests in 2010. The highest count for Reddish Egrets in this colony was 63 nests in 2010.

White Ibises are common year-round residents and breed in both the Isla Alcatraz and Estero Santa Cruz colonies. Roseate Spoonbills also nest in small numbers in the Estero Santa Cruz mixed-species colony (Fleishman and Blinick 2011). American Bitterns and White-faced Ibises were accidental and uncommon, respectively, in the estero during migration (Table 1).

In Estero Santa Cruz, the likely prey of the species surveyed here (Table 1) included both macroinvertebrates and small vertebrates found on the substrate and in the water column (Table 4). Regarding the diet of Yellow-crowned Night-Herons, the most frequently encountered prey remains (mostly chelipeds) were from large Mexican fiddler crabs (32%; Table 5). The density of large Mexican fiddler crab burrows measured 48.0 m-2 (n = 10 quadrats; SD = 18.09).

Figure 2.

Monthly presence (light gray) and breeding (dark gray) of wading birds on Isla Alcatraz estimated from cumulative observations during 2009–2013. Breeding was considered to begin with commencement of nest construction and to end in July when observations ceased.

f02_355.jpg

Discussion

The 10 most common Ardeidae species (plus the White Ibis) in the Bahía Kino bioregion are the same species identified across the wetland zones of Magdalena Bay, Baja California Sur, México (Zárate-Ovando et al. 2006). Similarly, the most species-rich habitat in both bioregions is the mangrove zone, and we found that 100% of wading bird species in our study used Estero Santa Cruz, which is dominated by mangroves. Although there is a shallow lagoon and low-tide-exposed mudflats along the eastern shore of Isla Alcatraz, most adult herons commute across the Bay on a daily basis to forage in the mangrove estuary. Indeed, the presence of mangrove habitat may be a key factor in supporting wading bird species richness in the Gulf of California as suggested by markedly fewer wading bird species documented in more northerly regions that lack these tropical/subtropical plant communities; only two species of herons were reported in La Salina, Bahía San Jorge (Mellink and Palacios 1993) and three species in Estero del Chayo, Isla Montague (Peresbarbosa and Mellink 2001).

Table 3.

Number of nests estimated from flight-rates (2009–2011) and direct counts (2012–2013) in Estero Santa Cruz during June 2009–2013. (In 2012 and 2013, the colony abandoned the original site and a subset relocated to Heron Island.)

t03_355.gif

As herons are opportunistic foragers, the small vertebrates and macroinvertebrates we sampled in the estero could conceivably constitute part of the prey base for most species. Yellow-crowned Night-Herons are specialists on crustaceans and feed on the abundant fiddler crabs in this bioregion. Interestingly, the density of large Mexican fiddler crab burrows in Estero Santa Cruz was almost identical to that found for sand fiddler crabs (U. pugilator) and mudflat fiddler crabs (U. rapax) combined (47.93 m-2) in a study conducted in Tampa Bay, Florida, USA (Smith et al. 2009). Overall, considering that we monitored wading birds in about 40% of the total area of Estero Santa Cruz (though this represents a higher percentage when accounting only for suitable potential nesting habitat), the survey estimates presented here should be considered a minimum; accordingly, it would be of interest to survey additional areas of the estero with a focus along the mangrove tidal channels. We also hypothesize that relative species abundances will vary across the different habitats of the estero.

Table 4.

Potential prey of herons sampled in Estero Santa Cruz, January 2013 and 2015.

t04_355.gif

Table 5.

Crustacean (Infraorder Brachyura) prey of Yellow-crowned Night-Herons sampled periodically since 1989.

t05_355.gif

On Isla Alcatraz, Great Blue Herons are the first species to begin breeding (Fig. 2). Similarly, Great Blue Herons are the earliest nesters on Isla Montague in the northern Gulf of California, but, perhaps as a function of their more northerly distribution, breeding begins several months later in mid-March (Peresbarbosa and Meilink 2001). On Isla Alcatraz, these are also the only herons that nest on the slopes in the cardón cactus, and they remain largely segregated from the rest of the wading bird colony due to the height and location of their nests. This may partially explain this species' consistency from year to year, as there is a fixed number of nest sites in the massive cardóns and, due to this heron's relatively large size and associated advantage in territorial disputes, there is no interspecific competition for nest sites. The other species in the wading bird colony, however, experience interspecific competition with other nesting waterbirds, including Double-crested Cormorants and Brown Pelicans, as they share the same nesting habitat in the desert scrub. From 2009–2013, there was a significant shift in nesting location from the base of the slope to spreading out across the flat portion of the island to the edge of the vegetation zone. This may be attributed to the large increase in nesting Brown Pelicans, which may displace the herons into less desirable territories (E. W. Clark, pers. obs.).

From a management and conservation perspective, Reddish Egrets are of particular interest as they are federally designated as a “species of special concern” in México (Palacios et al. 2010) and identified with a Red List category of “near threatened” by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (2013). In their survey of 45 Reddish Egret rookeries across western México, Palacios et al. (2010) recognized Isla Alcatraz as supporting the “most significant breeding population for Sonora and the second largest colony for northwest México.” Since those surveys, the Isla Alcatraz colony has increased in size. During our 2012 season, we documented that Isla Alcatraz remains the second largest Reddish Egret colony in northwest México (Wilson et al. 2014). Accordingly, such an important breeding population deserves special conservation attention, a main priority identified for this species (Kushlan and Hancock 2005).

The value of waterbird monitoring is that future population trends, especially in the face of environmental threats, can be identified against baseline data. This is especially important when confronting multiscale environmental changes, including the potential impact of human disturbance on sensitive species as well as the effects of both climate and sea-level shifts. The results of our 5-year monitoring program described here establish the high productivity of this bioregion. Specifically, fringe mangrove thickets, island desert scrub vegetation and tidally influenced mudflats, sand bars and channels are habitat components critical to nesting and foraging wading birds. However, the ever-increasing human use of both Estero Santa Cruz and Isla Alcatraz pose significant concerns for the long-term maintenance of biodiversity in this region and, overall, “degradation of coastal wetlands is one of the Gulf's most serious threats” (Carvajal et al. 2010). Thus, it is imperative that the growth of mariculture operations is controlled and that water quality is monitored at numerous points in the estero, especially at effluent input sites. In addition, it is important to educate the public, perhaps with official signage, that nesting colonies of wading birds should not be approached; this holds for Estero Santa Cruz as well as for Isla Alcatraz. Even though Isla Alcatraz is recognized as part of the Islas del Golfo de California Biosphere Reserve and is managed by the Comisión Nacional de Areas Naturales Protegidas (Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas 2000), there is a lack of funds for proper management and for patrolling by a much-needed seasonal park guard. The 2013 designation of Estero Santa Cruz as a Ramsar site is an encouraging step (Ramsar Convention on Wetlands 2013); however, there needs to be follow-through and concerted efforts to ensure the longterm sustainability of wading bird diversity in this ecologically valuable region of the Gulf of California.

Acknowledgments

This work was undertaken through the Research and Conservation Program of the Prescott College Kino Bay Center for Cultural and Ecological Studies, which was instrumental in the 2013 Ramsar designation for Estero Santa Cruz. We are grateful to Tad Pfister, Gregory Smart, Cosme Damien Beccaria and Neil Clark for various forms of logistical support, and especially to Lorayne Meltzer for providing the foundation, funding, advising and conservation context for the work. Eduardo Palacios has been a valuable advisor to the Prescott College Waterbird Monitoring Program. We thank Tom Fleischner for his contribution to the data collection over the years, students from the winter term Coastal Ecology course for assistance in the field, Ed Boyer and Maria Johnson for help in identifying estuarine organisms, and two anonymous reviewers for insightful comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. Prescott College's Waterbird Monitoring Program is funded in part by the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sonoran Joint Venture.

Literature Cited

1.

R. C. Brusca 1980. Common intertidal invertebrates of the Gulf of California, 2nd ed. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona. Google Scholar

2.

M. A. Carvajal , A. Robles and E. Ezcurra . 2010. Ecological conservation in the Gulf of California. Pages 219–250 in The Gulf of California: Biodiversity and Conservation (R. C. Brusca , Ed.). University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona. Google Scholar

3.

Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas. 2000. Programa de Manejo Area de Protección de Flora y Fauna Islas del Golfo de California, México. Comisión Nacional de Areas Naturales Protegidas, Tlacopac, México, D.F., México. (In Spanish). Google Scholar

4.

Comité de Sanidad Acuicola del Estado de Sonora (COSAES). 2014. Informe final ciclo 2014: seguimiento a los cultivos de camarón del estado de Sonora. COSAES, Hermosillo, México.  http://www.cosaes.com/Informe%20Final%20COSAES%202014%20Camaron.pdf, accessed 28 August 2015. (In Spanish). Google Scholar

5.

R. Erwin 1981. Censusing wading bird colonies: an update on the “flight-line” count method. Colonial Waterbirds 4: 91–95. Google Scholar

6.

R. S. Felger and B. T. Wilder . 2012. Plant life of a desert archipelago: flora of the Sonoran Islands in the Gulf of California. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona. Google Scholar

7.

T. L. Fleischner and H. R. Gates . 2009. Shorebird use of Estero Santa Cruz, Sonora, México: abundance, diversity and conservation implications. Waterbirds 32: 36–43. Google Scholar

8.

T. L. Fleischner and M. F. Riegner . 1993. Winter birds of Bahía Kino, central Gulf of California Coast, Sonora, México. Ecológica 3: 29–34. Google Scholar

9.

A. B. Fleishman and N. S. Blinick . 2011. Northerly extension of the breeding range of the Roseate Spoonbill in Sonora, México. Western Birds 42: 243–246. Google Scholar

10.

J. P. Galván 2007. California Brown Pelican nesting on Isla Alcatraz, Sonora, México. Western Birds 38: 296–298. Google Scholar

11.

J. P. Gibbs , F. A. Reid , S. M. Melvin , A. F. Poole and P. Lowther . 2009. Least Bittern (Ixobrychus exilis). No. 17 in The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole , Ed.). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York.  http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/017, accessed 15 April 2015. Google Scholar

12.

J. Grijalva-Chon , S. Nuñez-Quevedo and R. Castro Longoria . 1996. Ichthyofauna of La Cruz coastal lagoon, Sonora, México. Ciencias Marinas 22: 129. (In Spanish). Google Scholar

13.

E. Hurley and N. S. Blinick . 2011. Fledging chronology and behavior of Craveri's Murrelets (Synthliboramphus craveri) on Isla Alcatraz, Gulf of California, México. Marine Ornithology 39: 274–276. Google Scholar

14.

International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). 2013. The IUCN red list of threatened species, v. 2013.2. BirdLife International, Gland, Switzerland.  http://www.iucnredlist.org, accessed 15 April 2015. Google Scholar

15.

J. A. Kushlan 2011. Heron count protocols: inventory, census and monitoring of herons. International Union for Conservation of Nature-Species Survival Commission, Heron Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland. Google Scholar

16.

J. A. Kushlan and J. Hancock . 2005. Herons. Oxford University Press, New York, New York. Google Scholar

17.

E. Mellink and E. Palacios . 1993. Notes on breeding coastal waterbirds in northwestern Sonora. Western Birds 24: 29–37. Google Scholar

18.

E. Palacios , E. Amador and M. C. Green . 2010. Conservation of priority wading birds breeding in western México, specific to Reddish Egrets. Unpublished report, Centro de Investigación Cientifica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Pronatura Noroeste, A. C., and Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México. Google Scholar

19.

R. T. Paul and A. F. Paul . 2004. Project ColonyWatch handbook. Unpublished report, Audubon of Florida, Miami, Florida. Google Scholar

20.

E. Peresbarbosa and E. Mellink . 2001. Nesting waterbirds of Isla Montague, northern Gulf of California, México: loss of eggs due to predation and flooding, 1993–1994. Waterbirds 24: 265–271. Google Scholar

21.

T. Pfister , B. Pfister , V. Jiménez-Serranía , D. De-Pedro Díaz , G. Suárez-Gracida and J. N. Duberstein . 2005. Assessments of the nesting population of Double-crested Cormorants Phalacrocorax auritus on Isla Alcatraz, Gulf of California, México. Marine Ornithology 33: 195–197. Google Scholar

22.

Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. 2013. 139° sitio Ramsar de México.  http://ramsar.rgis.ch/cda/es/ramsar-news-archives-2013-mexico-cruz/main/ramsar/1-26-45-590%5E26229_4000_2, accessed 7 August 2015. (In Spanish). Google Scholar

23.

J. P. Rebman and N. C. Roberts . 2012. Baja California plant field guide, 3rd. ed. San Diego Natural History Museum, San Diego, California. Google Scholar

24.

N. F. Smith , C. Wilcox and J. M. Lessmann . 2009. Fiddler crab burrowing affects growth and production of the white mangrove (Laguncularia racemosa) in a restored Florida coastal marsh. Marine Biology 156: 2255–2266. Google Scholar

25.

G. L. Sprandel 2009. A comparison of direct and flight-line counts at a Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) colony in north Florida. Florida Field Naturalist 37: 86–93. Google Scholar

26.

R. M. Turner and D. E. Brown . 1982. Central Gulf Coast subdivision. Pages 212–217 in Biotic Communities of the American Southwest: United States and México. Special Issue, Desert Plants 4. (D. E. Brown , Ed.). University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona. Google Scholar

27.

T. E. Wilson , J. Wheeler , M. C. Green and E. Palacios (Eds.). 2014. Reddish Egret (Egretta rufescens) conservation action plan. Unpublished report, Reddish Egret Conservation Planning Workshop, October 2012, Corpus Christi, Texas. Google Scholar

28.

B. Zárate-Ovando , E. Palacios , H. Reyes-Bonilla , E. Amador and G. Saad . 2006. Waterbirds of the lagoon complex Magdalena Bay: Almejas, Baja California Sur, México. Waterbirds 29: 350–364. Google Scholar
Emily W. Clark, Abram B. Fleishman, and Mark F. Riegner "Diversity, Abundance and Nesting Phenology of the Wading Birds of Bahía Kino, Sonora, México," Waterbirds 38(4), 355-363, (1 December 2015). https://doi.org/10.1675/063.038.0412
Received: 10 September 2014; Accepted: 1 May 2015; Published: 1 December 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top