A total of 127 cases of disturbances were recorded, most of them resulting in not-too-serious reactions. An average disturbance affected 25 geese, occurred at 43 m distance to the cause and lasted 31–60 s. Geese feeding prior to the disturbance reacted more strongly than resting ones, and they were more sensitive to disturbances during the hatching and moulting/flightless period. More than fifty percent of the disturbances were caused by dogs — they affected significantly more geese, caused longer durations of disturbances, and probably higher energy costs. There were highly significant positive correlations between a reaction, the duration of a disturbance and the number of geese affected. However, distance to the waterline correlated only with the number of geese affected. Distance to waterline and distance to the source of the disturbance had a high impact on the number of geese affected in a regression model. When disturbances occurred at greater distances, these were more serious, lasted longer and affected more geese. Separate analysis of the dogs demonstrated the influence of dog size (the larger the dog, the greater the disturbance), but not whether it was on a lead. Fleeing into the water was caused by dogs more often than expected. Habituation to an urban environment and predictions for fleeing behaviour are discussed.
J. Bellebaum
2001. Tourismus in Schutzgebieten — können wir uns auf Habituation und “Nationalparkeffekte” verlassen? Vogelkundl. Ber. Niedersachsen 33: 125–129. Google Scholar
A. S. Cooke
1980. Observations on how close certain passerine species will tolerate an approaching human in rural and suburban habitats. Biol. Cons. 18: 85–88. Google Scholar
S. Delany
1993. Introduced and escaped Geese in Britain in summer 1991. Brit. Birds 86: 591–599. Google Scholar
J. del Hoyo,
A. Elliott,
J. Sargatal (eds).
1992. Handbook of the birds of the world. Vol. I. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar
A. Drost
,
H. Kruckenberg
,
J. J. E. Loonen
2001. Untersuchungen zur Störungsempfindlichkeit arktischer Nonnengänse während der Mauserzeit. Vogelkundl. Ber. Niedersachsen 33:137–142. Google Scholar
A. Frid
,
L. M. Dill
2002. Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conserv. Ecol. 6: 11. Google Scholar
E. J. M. Hagemeijer,
M. J. Blair
1997. The EBCC Atlas of European breeding birds: Their distribution and abundance. T & A D Poyser, London. Google Scholar
V. Keller
1989. Variation in the response of great crested grebes Podiceps cristatus to human disturbance — a sign of adaptation? Biol. Conserv. 49: 31–45. Google Scholar
V. Keller
1995. Auswirkungen menschlicher Störungen auf Vö gel — eine Literaturübersicht. Ornithol. Beob. 92: 3–38. Google Scholar
S. L. Lima
,
L. M. Dill
1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68: 619–640. Google Scholar
R. G. Mathers
,
S. Watson
,
R. Stone
,
W. I. Montgomery
2000. A study of the impact of human disturbance on wigeon Anas penelope and Brant geese Branta bernicla on an Irish Sea loch. Wildfowl 51: 67–81. Google Scholar
S. E. Newson
,
B. Hughes
1998. Diurnal activity and energy budgets of goosander Mergus merganser wintering on Chew Valley Lake, North Somerset: influence of time of day and sex. Wildfowl 49: 173–180. Google Scholar
C. Randier
2000. Wasservogelhybriden (Anseriformes) im westlichen Mitteleuropa — Verbreitung, Auftreten und Ursachen. Ökol. Vögel 22: 1–106. Google Scholar
C. Randler
2001. Field identification of hybrid wildfowl — Geese. Alula 7: 42–48. Google Scholar
R. Riddington
,
M. Hassall
,
S. J. Lane
,
P. A. Turner
,
R. Walters
1996. The impact of disturbances on the behaviour and energy budgets of Brent Geese Branta b. bernicla. Bird Study 43: 269–279. Google Scholar
M. Sell
1991. Raum-Zeit-Muster übernwinternder Entenvögel unter dem Einfluß anthropogener Störfaktoren: Experimente an einem Freizeitstausee im Ruhrgebiet. Ber. Sek. Intern. Rat Vogelschutz 30: 71–85. Google Scholar
U. Siebolts
1998. Reaktionen der Flußseeschwalbe Sterna hirundo gegenüber Menschen in verschiedenen Brutkolonien. Vogelwelt 119: 271–277. Google Scholar
M. Stock
,
F. Hofeditz
1996. Zeit-Aktivitäts-Budgets von Ringelgänsen (Branta bernicla bernicla) in unterschiedlich stark von Menschen beeinflußten Salzwiesen des Wattenmeers. Vogelwarte 38: 121–145. Google Scholar
M. Stock
,
F. Hofeditz
1997. Grenzen der Kompensation: Energiebudgets von Ringelgänsen (Branta b. bernicla) — die Wirkung von Störreizen. J. Ornithol. 138: 387–11. Google Scholar
H.-C Zehnter
,
M. Abs
1994. Fahrradfahrer und Fußgänger als Zeitgeber der diurnalen Aktivitätsrhythmik überwinternder Reiherenten (Aythya fuligula). J. Ornithol. 135: 81–93. Google Scholar
Acta Ornithologica
Vol. 38 • No. 1
July 2003
Vol. 38 • No. 1
July 2003
Anser cygnoides
bird-dog disturbances
feral population
habituation
human disturbances
Swan Goose
urban environment
