Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2003 Reactions to Human Disturbances in an Urban Population of the Swan Goose Anser cygnoides in Heidelberg (SW Germany)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A total of 127 cases of disturbances were recorded, most of them resulting in not-too-serious reactions. An average disturbance affected 25 geese, occurred at 43 m distance to the cause and lasted 31–60 s. Geese feeding prior to the disturbance reacted more strongly than resting ones, and they were more sensitive to disturbances during the hatching and moulting/flightless period. More than fifty percent of the disturbances were caused by dogs — they affected significantly more geese, caused longer durations of disturbances, and probably higher energy costs. There were highly significant positive correlations between a reaction, the duration of a disturbance and the number of geese affected. However, distance to the waterline correlated only with the number of geese affected. Distance to waterline and distance to the source of the disturbance had a high impact on the number of geese affected in a regression model. When disturbances occurred at greater distances, these were more serious, lasted longer and affected more geese. Separate analysis of the dogs demonstrated the influence of dog size (the larger the dog, the greater the disturbance), but not whether it was on a lead. Fleeing into the water was caused by dogs more often than expected. Habituation to an urban environment and predictions for fleeing behaviour are discussed.

REFERENCES

1.

J. Bellebaum 2001. Tourismus in Schutzgebieten — können wir uns auf Habituation und “Nationalparkeffekte” verlassen? Vogelkundl. Ber. Niedersachsen 33: 125–129. Google Scholar

2.

A. S. Cooke 1980. Observations on how close certain passerine species will tolerate an approaching human in rural and suburban habitats. Biol. Cons. 18: 85–88. Google Scholar

3.

J. Delacour 1954. The waterfowl of the world. Vol. I. Country Life, London. Google Scholar

4.

S. Delany 1993. Introduced and escaped Geese in Britain in summer 1991. Brit. Birds 86: 591–599. Google Scholar

5.

J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott, J. Sargatal (eds). 1992. Handbook of the birds of the world. Vol. I. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Google Scholar

6.

A. Drost , H. Kruckenberg , J. J. E. Loonen 2001. Untersuchungen zur Störungsempfindlichkeit arktischer Nonnengänse während der Mauserzeit. Vogelkundl. Ber. Niedersachsen 33:137–142. Google Scholar

7.

A. Frid , L. M. Dill 2002. Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conserv. Ecol. 6: 11. Google Scholar

8.

E. J. M. Hagemeijer, M. J. Blair 1997. The EBCC Atlas of European breeding birds: Their distribution and abundance. T & A D Poyser, London. Google Scholar

9.

V. Keller 1989. Variation in the response of great crested grebes Podiceps cristatus to human disturbance — a sign of adaptation? Biol. Conserv. 49: 31–45. Google Scholar

10.

V. Keller 1995. Auswirkungen menschlicher Störungen auf Vö gel — eine Literaturübersicht. Ornithol. Beob. 92: 3–38. Google Scholar

11.

S. L. Lima , L. M. Dill 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68: 619–640. Google Scholar

12.

R. G. Mathers , S. Watson , R. Stone , W. I. Montgomery 2000. A study of the impact of human disturbance on wigeon Anas penelope and Brant geese Branta bernicla on an Irish Sea loch. Wildfowl 51: 67–81. Google Scholar

13.

S. E. Newson , B. Hughes 1998. Diurnal activity and energy budgets of goosander Mergus merganser wintering on Chew Valley Lake, North Somerset: influence of time of day and sex. Wildfowl 49: 173–180. Google Scholar

14.

C. Randier 2000. Wasservogelhybriden (Anseriformes) im westlichen Mitteleuropa — Verbreitung, Auftreten und Ursachen. Ökol. Vögel 22: 1–106. Google Scholar

15.

C. Randler 2001. Field identification of hybrid wildfowl — Geese. Alula 7: 42–48. Google Scholar

16.

R. Riddington , M. Hassall , S. J. Lane , P. A. Turner , R. Walters 1996. The impact of disturbances on the behaviour and energy budgets of Brent Geese Branta b. bernicla. Bird Study 43: 269–279. Google Scholar

17.

M. Sell 1991. Raum-Zeit-Muster übernwinternder Entenvögel unter dem Einfluß anthropogener Störfaktoren: Experimente an einem Freizeitstausee im Ruhrgebiet. Ber. Sek. Intern. Rat Vogelschutz 30: 71–85. Google Scholar

18.

U. Siebolts 1998. Reaktionen der Flußseeschwalbe Sterna hirundo gegenüber Menschen in verschiedenen Brutkolonien. Vogelwelt 119: 271–277. Google Scholar

19.

M. Stock , F. Hofeditz 1996. Zeit-Aktivitäts-Budgets von Ringelgänsen (Branta bernicla bernicla) in unterschiedlich stark von Menschen beeinflußten Salzwiesen des Wattenmeers. Vogelwarte 38: 121–145. Google Scholar

20.

M. Stock , F. Hofeditz 1997. Grenzen der Kompensation: Energiebudgets von Ringelgänsen (Branta b. bernicla) — die Wirkung von Störreizen. J. Ornithol. 138: 387–11. Google Scholar

21.

H.-C Zehnter , M. Abs 1994. Fahrradfahrer und Fußgänger als Zeitgeber der diurnalen Aktivitätsrhythmik überwinternder Reiherenten (Aythya fuligula). J. Ornithol. 135: 81–93. Google Scholar
Christoph Randler "Reactions to Human Disturbances in an Urban Population of the Swan Goose Anser cygnoides in Heidelberg (SW Germany)," Acta Ornithologica 38(1), 47-52, (1 July 2003). https://doi.org/10.3161/068.038.0110
Received: 1 October 2002; Accepted: 1 January 2003; Published: 1 July 2003
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top