Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2004 Factors Affecting Temporal Dynamics of Avian Assemblages in a Heterogeneous Landscape
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The influence of the characteristics of habitat fragments on the dynamics of avian communities and the effect that fragments of different sizes have on the stability of the breeding species composition, and also on local extinction, colonisation and turnover rates were studied in an agricultural landscape in southern Poland. The fragments included various habitat types that differed from the matrix. Breeding birds were surveyed using the territory mapping method to assess turnover. Species composition depended on both the spatial structure of a fragment and the features of its surroundings. Local declines and appearances of species had a similar influence on the turnover in all size classes of the fragments. Species that contributed most to the total turnover were: Lanius collurio, Phasianus colchicus, Anas platyrhynchos, Emberiza schoeniclus, Columba palumbus and Sylvia communis. However, there were differences among species contributing most to the turnover according to area size classes. Heterogeneous habitats in a mosaic-like, agricultural landscape do not function as islands. The existence of species in an area with such a level of habitat patchiness can be related primarily to habitat quality, mainly because of poor isolation and the high permeability of isolating habitats.

REFERENCES

1.

M. Baguette , B. Deceuninck , Y. Muller 1994. Effect of spruce afforestation on bird community dynamics in a native broad-leaved forest area. Acta Oecol. 15: 275–288. Google Scholar

2.

G. Balent , B. Courtiade 1992. Modelling bird communities and landscape patterns relationships in a rural area of Southwestern France. Landscape Ecol. 6: 195–211. Google Scholar

3.

J. M. Bentley , C. P. Catterall 1997. The use of bushland, corridors and linear remnants by birds in southeastern Queensland, Australia. Conserv. Biol. 11: 1173–1189. Google Scholar

4.

C. J. Bibby , N. D. Burgess , D. A. Hill 1992. Bird census techniques. Academic Press, London. Google Scholar

5.

L. Brotons , M. Mönkkönen , J. L. Martin 2003. Are fragments islands? Landscape context and density-area relationships in boreal forest birds. Am. Nat. 162: 343–357. Google Scholar

6.

M. Cieślak 1994. The vulnerability of breeding birds to forest fragmentation. Acta Ornithol. 29: 29–38. Google Scholar

7.

J. M. Diamond 1969. Avifaunal equilibria and species turnover rates on the Channel Islands of California. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 69: 3199–3203. Google Scholar

8.

P. F. Doherty , T. C. Grubb 2002. Survivorship of permanentresident birds in a fragmented forested landscape. Ecology 83: 844–857. Google Scholar

9.

M. Gilpin , 1. Hanski 1991. Metapopulation dynamics. Academic Press, London. Google Scholar

10.

Z. Głowaciński 1981. Stability in bird communities during the secondary succession of a forest ecosystem. Ekol. pol. 29: 73–95. Google Scholar

11.

J. M. Hagan , W. M. van der Haegen , P. S. McKinley 1996. The early development of forest fragmentation effects on birds. Conserv. Biol. 10: 188–202. Google Scholar

12.

Y. Haila 2002. A conceptual genealogy of fragmentation research: from island biogeography to landscape ecology. Ecol. Appl. 12: 321–334. Google Scholar

13.

Y. Haila , I. K. Hanski , J. Niemela , P. Puntilla , S. Raivio , H. Tukia 1994. Forestry and the boreal fauna: matching management with natural forest dynamic. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 31: 187–202. Google Scholar

14.

I. Hanski 1994. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 151–162. Google Scholar

15.

S. A. Hinsley , P. E. Bellamy , I. Newton 1995. Bird species turnover and stochastic extinction in woodland fragments. Ecography 18: 41–50. Google Scholar

16.

R. J. Hobbs 1993. Effects of landscape fragmentation on ecosystem processes in the Western Australian wheatbelt. Biol. Conserv. 64: 193–201. Google Scholar

17.

J. Jokimäki , E. Huhta , M. Mönkkönen , A. Nikula 2000. Temporal variation of bird assemblages in moderately fragmented and less-fragmented boreal forest landscapes: a multi-scale approach. Ecoscience 7: 256–266. Google Scholar

18.

R. H. MacArthur , E. O. Wilson 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Google Scholar

19.

C. F. Mason 2001. Woodland area, species turnover and the conservation of bird assemblages in lowland England. Biodiv. Conserv. 10: 495–510. Google Scholar

20.

E. Matthysen , F. Adriaensen , A.A. Dhondt 1995. Dispersal distances of nuthatches, Sitta europaea, in a highly fragmented landscape. Oikos 72: 375–381. Google Scholar

21.

M. R. Norton , S. J. Hannon , F. K. A. Schmiegelow 2000. Fragments are not islands: patch vs landscape perspectives on songbird presence and abundance in a harvested boreal forest. Ecography 23: 209–223. Google Scholar

22.

P. Opdam 1991. Metapopulation theory and habitat fragmentation: a review of holarctic breeding bird studies. Landscape Ecol. 5: 93–106. Google Scholar

23.

B. S. Petersen 1998. The distribution of Danish farmland birds in relation to habitat characteristics. Ornis Fennica 75: 105–118. Google Scholar

24.

J. Rolstad 1991. Consequences of forest fragmentation for the dynamics of bird populations: conceptual issues and the evidence. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42: 149–163. Google Scholar

25.

D. A. Saunders , R. J. Hobbs , C. R. Margules 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv. Biol. 5: 18–29. Google Scholar

26.

StatSoft Inc. 1997. Statistica for Window. Tulsa OK. Polish Edition by StatSoft Polska Sp. z o.o. Kraków, Poland. Google Scholar

27.

S. Tworek 2001. Breeding bird communities in relation to different habitat islands. Nature Conserv. 58: 117–128. Google Scholar

28.

S. Tworek 2002. Different bird strategies and their responses to habitat changes in an agricultural landscape. Ecol. Res. 17: 339–359. Google Scholar

29.

S. Tworek 2003. Local extinction, colonisation and turnover rates of breeding birds in fragmented landscapes: differences between migratory guilds. Ornis Fennica 80: 49–62. Google Scholar

30.

J. A. Wiens , C. S. Crawford , J. R. Gosz 1985. Boundary dynamics: a conceptual framework for studying landscape ecosystems. Oikos 45: 421–427. Google Scholar

31.

D. S. Wilcove , C. H. McLellan , A. P. Dobson 1986. Habitat fragmentation in the temperate zone. In: M. E. Soulé (ed.). Conservation Biology. The science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts, USA, pp. 237–256. Google Scholar
Stanisław Tworek "Factors Affecting Temporal Dynamics of Avian Assemblages in a Heterogeneous Landscape," Acta Ornithologica 39(2), 155-163, (1 December 2004). https://doi.org/10.3161/068.039.0201
Received: 1 December 2003; Accepted: 1 September 2004; Published: 1 December 2004
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top