Marilina Vera Cortez, Joaquín Luis Navarro, Mónica Beatriz Martella
Acta Ornithologica 53 (1), 81-90, (1 July 2018) https://doi.org/10.3161/00016454AO2018.53.1.008
KEYWORDS: radio telemetry, conservation, wildlife management, captive management, reintroduction, rhea
The Greater Rhea Rhea americana is a South-American flightless bird whose populations have decreased due to poaching and fragmentation of suitable habitats, and there has been an urgent need to carry out management practices to prevent local or regional extinctions. Several studies revealed that reintroduction might be an appropriate action for increasing the viability of wild populations of this species. Nevertheless, although this is a popular and useful conservation strategy, the animals to be released should be prepared against risks like predation and dispersion that could influence the post-release success. We evaluated the effect of an antipredator training applied to captive-bred Greater Rheas before they were released into the wild, on their dispersal and home range size and overlap, supposing that the trained animals would avoid dispersing into places with predators and, consequently, they would reduce their home range. We also studied the habitat use by the released rheas. Eleven trained and nine control (untrained) animals were marked and monitored two to four times per day during the first week, and from 4 to 19 consecutive days per month during four months, throughout the breeding and post-breeding seasons. The antipredator training affected the home range in different ways according to sex. Trained females exhibited smaller home ranges (mean ± S.E.: 0.54 ± 0.58 km2) than the rest of the individuals (control females 5.8 ± 0.75 km2, control and trained males: 2.11 ± 0.65 km2 and 2.96 ± 0.65 km2, respectively), whereas their overlap was greater (63.83 ± 16.95%) than that of the untrained females (24.04 ± 21.88%). Males of both experimental groups showed similar distances travelled (3.21 ± 0.29 km), which were also greater than those of females (2.21 ± 0.32 km). The home ranges of males were not influenced by the training and they showed a high degree of overlapping (among control males 29.96 ± 18.95%, and among trained males: 35.81 ± 18.95%). Both groups similarly used crops and in lesser extent open areas and grassland. Only the trained females reduced their movements and wandering as a result of the previous conditioning. They moved to crop or open areas, avoiding tall vegetation such as that present in grasslands, which may make difficult to detect predators. On the other hand, in the males, the influence of the reproductive season and the complex mating system exhibited by this species prevailed over the possible effects of training. Our work shows new and useful data about the spatial behaviour and reintroduction for conservation of the Greater Rhea.