Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2011 New Finds of Stegosaur Tracks from the Upper Jurassic Lourinhã Formation, Portugal
Octávio Mateus, Jesper Milàn, Michael Romano, Martin A. Whyte
Author Affiliations +

Eleven new tracks from the Upper Jurassic of Portugal are described and attributed to the stegosaurian ichnogenus Deltapodus. One track exhibits exceptionally well-preserved impressions of skin on the plantar surface, showing the stegosaur foot to be covered by closely spaced skin tubercles of ca. 6 mm in size. The Deltapodus specimens from the Aalenian of England represent the oldest occurrence of stegosaurs and imply an earlier cladogenesis than is recognized in the body fossil record.


The European stegosaur track record is scarce, compared to the number of tracks described for other dinosaur groups. The track Deltapodus brodricki Whyte and Romano, 1994, described from the Aalenian, Middle Jurassic, of Yorkshire, was the first track to be identified as a stegosaur track due to its distinct tridactyl configuration which is a close match to the stegosaurian pedal skeleton (Whyte and Romano 1994, 2001).

Deltapodus tracks are now known from the Middle Jurassic Ravenscar Group of Yorkshire (Whyte et al. 2007), the Upper Jurassic of Asturias (Garcia-Ramos et al. 2006, 2008; Lockley et al. 2008) and Teruel, Spain (Cobos et al. 2008, 2010), the Upper Jurassic Lourinhã Formation of Portugal (Mateus and Milàn 2008, 2010), the Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison Formation of Utah, USA (Milàn and Chiappe 2009), and the Upper Jurassic Iouaridène Formation of Morocco (Belvedere and Mietto 2010). Here we describe 11 new specimens (nine pes and two manus tracks) of Deltapodus recently collected from the Upper Jurassic Lourinhã Formation of Portugal, and discuss their palaeoenvironmental context compared with the other known records of of Deltapodus.

Although Deltapodus is here regarded as a valid ichnogenus, the senior author urges a discussion on the validity of binomial Linnean (ichno)species and (ichno)genus names to tracks and ichnofossils.

Abbreviations.—PN, Peralta North; PS, Peralta South; VF, Vale Frades; PBN, Porto Barcas North; PBS, Porto Barcas South; PD, Porto Dinheiro.

Geological setting

The Upper Jurassic Lourinhã Formation (sensu Hill 1989; Martinius and Gowland 2010; Kullberg et al. in press) is exposed in the central-western part of Portugal and especially in the vicinity of the small town of Lourinhã approximately 70 km north of Lisboa (Fig. 1). The sediments of the Lourinhã Formation were deposited in the Lusitanian Basin and comprise in excess of 400 m of terrestrial sediments, deposited during the latest Jurassic (Late Kimmeridgian—Early Tithonian), during the initial rifting stage of the Atlantic Ocean (Hill 1989).

The sediments predominantly consist of thick beds of red and green clay, interbedded with massive, fluvial sandstone bodies and heterolithic beds. The Lourinhã Formation has yielded an extensive vertebrate fauna (Lapparent and Zbyszewski 1957; Galton 1980; Antunes 1998; Antunes et al. 1998; Mateus et al. 1998, 2006; Antunes and Mateus 2003; Pereda-Superbiola et al. 2005; Mateus 2006; Escaso et al. 2007) and abundant carbonized fragments of plants and large fossilized logs (Pais 1998). The frequent sedimentologic shifts between flood-plain mudstones and fluvial sandstone bodies create the perfect environment for track preservation, and numerous well-preserved tracks and trackways have been described from the Lourinhã Formation (Antunes and Mateus 2003; Milàn et al. 2005; Mateus and Milàn 2008, 2010).

New Deltapodus tracks

Nine, well-preserved Deltapodus pes tracks and two manus tracks were discovered in coastal cliff sections west of Lourinhã (Fig. 1). In the following account, the specimens are named after the locality from where they were collected (Table 1). All specimens were found preserved as natural casts and are stored in the collection of the Museum da Lourinhã.

Vale Frades (VF).—The first Deltapodus pes track, discovered in 2003, was preserved as an eroded natural cast of sandstone on a pedestal of clay. The track was found together with a large ornithopod track (Mateus and Milàn 2008). Anatomical details are not preserved, except for the three short blunt toes and a relatively wide square heel (Table 1, Fig. 2A).

Peralta (PN and PS).—A pes track, found north of the beach of Peralta (PN), has faint skin striations in the heel area and on the sides of the digits. The heel in this specimen is rounded, tapering to a slightly pointed end (Fig. 2B). Another larger pes track (PS) was found in situ in the steep coastal cliffs south of the beach (Table 1, Fig. 2C).

Porto Barcas (PBN and PBS 1–6).—On the north side of Porto Barcas, an asymmetric pes track (PBN) was collected. Striations from the skin are preserved on parts of the track walls (Table 1, Fig. 2D).

Table 1.

Dimensions (in cm) of the new Deltapodus specimens from the Lourinhã Formation, Portugal.


Fig. 1.

Location map. The eleven new specimens of Deltapodus were found along the coast west of the town Lourinhã, in the central-west of Portugal. Each specimen has been given an abbreviation corresponding to the locality where it was found.


Four pes and two manus tracks were found south of the beach of Porto Barcas. The largest pes track (PBS 1) has faint striations from the skin preserved on parts of the trackwalls. The track is slightly deformed sideways as if the animal's foot has been sliding anterolaterally through the sediment (Fig. 2E).

A slightly smaller specimen (PBS 2) (Table 1, Fig. 2F) has well-preserved skin impressions covering the plantar surface of the track, as well as striations preserved on the track walls (Fig. 3). The cast reveals a skin texture consisting of closely packed subrounded tubercles 4–8 mm in diameter and one millimetre high. There is no significant difference in size or shape of the “scales” within the plantar surface, although laterally the “scales” are slightly smaller (4–5 mm wide). The tubercles are evenly distributed over all the plantar surface and only the hoof-like distal parts of the digits are smooth (Fig. 3), though some of the detail is obscured by invertebrate burrows that cross the track just behind the digits. The heel of the track is square in outline. Specimen PBS 3 lacks part of the heel and one side, and has only faint striations preserved on the track walls. It appears to have been tapering towards the heel, as in PBN (Fig. 2G). Another incomplete specimen (PBS 4) lacks parts of two digits. The width of the track decreases posteriorly, giving the track a triangular appearance (Fig. 2H).

Two natural casts of deeply impressed manus tracks (PBS 5 and 6) were found associated with the pes tracks. The manus casts are semilunate in shape, without any indications of free digits. One specimen (PBS 5) is eroded and shows no striations from the skin (Table 1, Fig. 4A). The other specimen (PBS 6) is widest at the bottom, suggesting the soft sediment of the track walls partly converged after withdrawal of the foot (Table 1, Fig. 4B1, B2). The front of the manus is smooth, without indications of individual digits, and striations from the skin being dragged through the substrate can be traced from top to bottom of the cast (Fig. 4B3).

Porto Dinheiro (PD).—A probable left pes (PD) was associated with theropod tracks of varying sizes and large sauropod tracks (Mateus and Milan 2010). Faint striations from the skin are preserved on the sides of the cast, and the shape of the heel is square (Fig. 2I).

Fig. 2

. The nine studied specimens of Deltapodus pes tracks from the Lourinhã Formation (Upper Jurassic, Portugal). ML1342 (A), ML1343 (B), ML1344 (C), ML1345 (D), ML1346 (E), ML1347 (F), ML1348 (G), ML1349 (H), ML1350 (I). The abbreviations below each track refers to the location it was found (Fig. 1). All tracks are reproduced to same scale.



The ichnogenus Deltapodus is characterized by having tridactyl, mesaxonic pes prints that are generally triangular in outline, widest across the lateral digit impressions and slightly longer than wide. The short digits are blunt and rounded. Manus prints are entaxonic, irregular, but broadly crescentic in outline and approximately twice as wide as long with occasional impressions of an inward directed pollex (Whyte and Romano 1994). All the Portuguese material may be confidently assigned to Deltapodus and the range in morphology present in the Portuguese pes specimens is no greater than that seen in the English Ravenscar Group specimens (Romano and Whyte 2003: fig. 21), and when plotted on a scatter diagram of pes length against pes width they fall well within the confines of the ichnospecies (Fig. 5). The only significant feature of the Portuguese material that distinguishes it from the larger sample from the Ravenscar Group is that pes tracks of the former are generally larger and indeed record the largest Deltapodus pes track yet known (Fig. 2).

Fig. 3.

Deltapodus track PBS 2 (ML 1347) from the Lourinhã Formation (Upper Jurassic, Portugal). A. Plantar view. B. Detail of scaly skin impressions. C. Vertical striations of the skin on the cast surface.


The specimens from Asturias (Lockley et al. 2008), are similar to the Portuguese and English material (Whyte and Romano 1994, 2001), and the specimen from Utah (Milàn and Chiappe 2009) does not differ morphologically from the European material. The African specimens (Belvedere and Mietto 2010) are not well-preserved, but appear relatively narrower in the heel area than the European and American specimens, and are still included in Deltapodus brodricki. Recently, Cobos et al. (2010) erected the name Deltapodus ibericus for tracks with slightly different track and trackway parameters, although the general dimensions of individual D. ibericus tracks fall well within the confines of the scatterplot for D. brodricki (Fig. 5).

A relatively small Deltapodus-like print (22.5 cm long, 16.5 cm wide) has been recorded (Mohabey 1986) from the late Maastrichtian Infratrappean Limestone of Jetholi Talao, India, in association with a dinosaur egg clutch. The print was originally identified as a sauropod left manus track (Mohabey 1986) but, if indeed a true Deltapodus, it is by far the youngest occurrence of this ichnotaxon whose currently known range is otherwise Aalenian to Tithonian.

Though pes dimensions show a good coherent relationship (Fig. 5), it was clear in the original concept of Deltapodus that there was considerable variation in pes track outline, posterior margin configuration and digit impressions (Whyte and Romano 1994; see also Whyte and Romano 2001: fig. 3; Romano and Whyte 2003: fig. 21). However, no clear indication of more than one ichnospecies was apparent as most variation was considered to be due to preservation rather than reflecting a major morphological or behavioural difference. Among the nine new pes tracks from Portugal, there appear to be three different morphotypes, distinguished by their general shape and heel outline. Specimen PN (Fig. 2B) has relatively parallel sides and terminates in a drop-like shape. Specimens PBN (Fig. 2D), PBS 3 (Fig. 2G), and PBS 4 (Fig. 2H) have straight sides converging to a rounded heel, giving the track a triangular shape; and specimens VF (Fig. 2A), PBS 1 (Fig. 2E), PBS 2 (Fig. 2F), and PD (Fig. 21) have sub-parallel sides and a more angular heel outline. Such outlines are also apparent in some of the Ravenscar Group specimens (Romano and Whyte 2003: fig. 21J A and C, respectively). While the three morphotypes may conceivably represent different ichnospecies, the inadequate data sample and lack of complete trackways prevents any firm conclusions being drawn at present.

The two manus tracks from Lourinhã do not show the well marked digit I impression found in the holotype of Deltapodus brodricki but lie within the range of variation exhibited by manus prints from the type locality (Whyte and Romano 1994), and those observed in the Deltapodus trackways from Asturias (Lockley et al 2008). The manus casts were found loose below the cliff-face together with the pes casts, and can thus not be positively correlated with any of the pes casts. No other tracks were found at the locality, so we provisionally associate the manus tracks to the pes tracks. Striations similar to those exhibited on some of the Portuguese tracks have also been recorded on pes prints from the Ravenscar Group (Romano and Whyte 2003: fig. 4). However the preservation of tuberculate skin imprints on the plantar surface of one of the Portuguese pes tracks is the first time such structures have been recorded in Deltapodus and thus add important information about the soft tissue anatomy of the trackmakers. Similar skin impressions are reported from the forelimb and shoulder area in a partly mummified stegosaur Gigantspinosaurus sichuanensis from the Upper Jurassic Shangshaximiao Formation, China (Xing et al. 2008). The skin pattern covering the body on this fossil is that of polygonal scales of 5.7 to 9.2 mm size, with occasional larger scales (Xing et al. 2008).

Fig. 4.

The two associated natural casts of Deltapodus manus tracks found at Porto Barcas, Lourinhã Formation (Upper Jurassic, Portugal). Both tracks show a pronounced semilunate shape. A. Manus track PBS 5 (ML 1351) seen from below. B. Manus track PBS6 (ML 1352) seen from below (B1), caudal view (B2), and enlarged section of the front (B3), showing the vertical striations covering the front and sides of the cast.


The occurrence of Deltapodus in flood plain deposits of the Lourinhã Formation is comparable to that in the type area of the ichnogenus in the Yorkshire (Cleveland) Basin (Romano and Whyte 2003; Whyte et al. 2007). A similar facies association is also recorded for the Upper Jurassic of Asturias (Garcia-Ramos et al. 2006, 2008; Lockley et al. 2008) and Teruel, in Spain (Cobos et al. 2008, 2010), the Iouaridène Formation of Morocco (Upper Jurassic) (Belvedere and Mietto 2010) and the Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison Formation (Upper Jurassic) of Utah, United States (Milàn and Chiappe 2009). This suggests a preferred flood plain habitat for the Deltaopodus trackmakers, though the contrasting sedimentologic characteristics of these sequences (siliciclastic, carbonate rich and red beds) point to a spectrum of palaeoclimates.

Deltapodus brodricki was at first considered to have been made by a sauropod (Whyte and Romano 1993, 1994), though it was recognised that some features were not typical of sauropod tracks. Critical reconsideration of the evidence together with new information led to a re-evaluation, and Deltapodus was assigned to a stegosaurian maker (Whyte and Romano 2001; Romano and Whyte 2003; Whyte et al. 2007). Tracks with other morphologies have previously been interpreted as being stegosaurian in origin (e.g., Lockley and Hunt 1998; Gierliński and Sabath 2008; see also Whyte and Romano 2001), but Deltapodus is still “arguably the most fully described ichnite attributed to stegosaurs” (Whyte and Romano 2001: 52). The articulated feet of Kentrosaurus and Stegosaurus (Galton and Upchurch 2004) indicate that stegosaurians had a pedal phalangeal formula of 0-2-2-2-0, with short, broad proximal phalanges, and broad and depressed unguals. This matches the digit characteristics of the pes of Deltapodus. Skeletal remains of stegosaurs are abundant in the Upper Jurassic of Europe, with several species present (Maidment et al. 2008; Mateus et al. 2009), which is consistent with the widespread occurrence of Deltapodus. Ankylosaurs, which have been considered as possible makers of Deltapodus (McCrea et al. 2001), are also known from the Middle and Upper Jurassic of Europe in the form of Sarcolestes leedsi from the Callovian of England and Dracopelta from the Kimmeridgian of Portugal (Vickaryous et al. 2004). However neither of these have preserved skeletal material of the feet; but, while the pes of other ankylosaurs can be penta-, tetra-, or tridactyl, the tridactyl Euoplocephalus (Coombs 1986) is only known from the Upper Cretaceous. Three different genera of stegosaurs are known from the Upper Jurassic of Portugal alone, namely Stegosaurus, Dacentrurus, and Miragaia (Mateus et al. 2008, 2009 and references therein). These may relate to the three slightly different morphotypes recognised within the Deltapodus tracks from the Lourinhã Formation, but future finds of additional stegosaur tracks and preferably complete trackways will shed more light on this.

Fig. 5.

Scatter diagram showing the relationship between pes footprint length (L) and footprint width (W) for specimens of Deltapodus from England, Portugal, Spain (1 Asturias, 2 Teruel), USA and Morocco. The example from Teruel is a mean value (Cobos et al. 2010).


The occurrence of Deltapodus in the Aalenian of England and its confirmation as a stegosaur track implies an earlier cladogenesis for the Stegosauria, than the Bajocian or Bathonian age implied by the skeletal record (Maidment et al. 2008). The known stratigraphic range of Deltapodus is at present restricted to the Middle to Late Jurassic (Aalenian to Tithonian) although the skeletal record of stegosaurs extends into the Lower Cretaceous (Maidment et al. 2008). Considerable doubt (Chatterjee and Rudra 1996; see also Maidment et al. 2008) has been cast on records of stegosaurs in the Late Cretaceous of India (Yadagiri and Ayasami 1979; Galton and Upchurch 2004) but they would be in accord with the record of a Deltapodus-like track in the Late Cretaceous (Mohabey 1986). The larger maximum size of pes prints (Fig. 5) from the Upper Jurassic of Portugal and Spain as compared to that of Middle Jurassic Deltapodus prints from Yorkshire may reflect an evolutionary trend for increased body size within the stegosaurs.


The discovery of 11 new Deltapodus tracks from the Lourinhã Formation of Portugal expands the known biogeographic distribution of this ichnogenus. One track exhibits exceptionally well-preserved impressions of skin on the plantar surface, providing unique information of the soft-tissue anatomy of the stegosaur pes, by showing the pes to have been covered by closely spaced skin tubercles of ca. 6 mm in size. The Deltapodus specimens from the Aalenian of England represent the oldest occurrence of undisputed stegosaur tracks. This implies an earlier cladogenesis of the group than suggested by the skeletal record.


We are grateful for the critical and constructive reviews from Marco Avanzini (Museo Tridentino di Scienze Naturali, Trento, Italy), José-Carlos García-Ramos (Museo del Jurásico de Asturias, Asturias, Spain), and Susannah Maidment (The Natural History Museum, London, UK). The research of JM was supported by the Danish Natural Science Research Council. OM was supported by fellowship (BPD/25291/2005) of the Portuguese Fundação para Ciência de Tecnologia.



M.T. Antunes 1998. A new Upper Jurassic paulchoffatiid multituberculate (Mammalia) from Pai Mogo, Portugal. Memórias da Academia de Ciências de Lisboa 37: 125–153. Google Scholar


M.T. Antunes and O. Mateus 2003. Dinosaurs of Portugal. Comptes Rendus Palevol 2: 77–95. Google Scholar


M.T. Antunes , P. Taquet , and V. Ribeiro 1998. Upper Jurassic dinosaur and crocodile eggs from Pai Mogo nesting site (Lourinhã - Portugal). Memórias da Academia de Ciências de Lisboa 37: 83–100. Google Scholar


M. Belvedere and P. Mietto 2010. First evidence of stegosaurian Deltapodus footprints in north Africa (Iouaridène Formation, Upper Jurassic, Morocco). Palaeontology 53: 233–240. Google Scholar


S. Chatterjee and D.K. Rudra 1996. KT events in India: impact, volcanism and dinosaur extinction. In : F.A. Novas and R.E. Molnar (eds.), Proceedings of the Gondwana Dinosaur Symposium. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 39: 489–532. Google Scholar


A. Cobos , R. Royo-Torres , L. Luque , L. Alcalá , and L. Mampel 2010. An Iberian Stegosaurus paradise: The Villar del Arzobispo Formation (Tithonian-Berriasian) in Teruel (Spain). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 293: 223–236. Google Scholar


A. Cobos , R. Royo-Torres , L. Alcalá , L. Luque , and A. Aberasturi 2008. Nuevos datos de las icnitas de dinosaurios en la Formación Villar del Arzobispo (Teruel). In : J.I. Ruiz-Omeñaca , L. Piñuela , and J.C. García-Ramos (eds.), XXIV Jornadas de la Sociedad Española de Paleontología. Museo del Jurásico de Asturias (MUJA), Colunga, 15–18 de octubre de 2008, Libro de resúmenes , 25–26. Google Scholar


W.P. Coombs Jr. 1986. A juvenile ankylosaur referable to the genus Euoplocephalus (Reptilia, Ornithischia). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 6: 162–173. Google Scholar


F. Escaso , F. Ortega , P. Dantas , E. Malafaia , N.L. Pimentel , X. Pereda-Superbiola , J.L. Sanz , J.C. Kullberg , M.C. Kullberg , and F. Barriga 2007. New evidence of shared dinosaurs across Upper Jurassic Proto-North Atlantic: Stegosaurus from Portugal. Naturwissenschaften 94: 367–374. Google Scholar


P.M. Galton 1980: Partial skeleton of Dracopelta zbyszewskii n. gen. and n. sp., an ankylosaurian dinosaur from the Upper Jurassic of Portugal. Géobios 13:451–457. Google Scholar


P.M. Galton and P. Upchurch 2004. Stegosauria. In : D.B. Weishampel , P. Dodson , and H. Osmólska , (eds.), The Dinosauria, Second edition , 343–362. University of California Press, Berkeley. Google Scholar


J.C. Garcia-Ramos , L. Piñuela , and J. Lires 2006. Atlas del Jurássico de Asturias. 225 pp. Ediciones Nobel, Oviedo. Google Scholar


J.C. García-Ramos , L. Piñuela , J.I. Ruiz-Omeñaca , and X. Pereda-Suberbiola 2008. Costas jurásicas frecuentadas por estegosaurios. In : J.I. Ruiz-Omeñaca , L. Piñuela , and J.C. García-Ramos (eds.), XXIV Jornadas de la Sociedad Española de Paleontología. Museo del Jurásico de Asturias (MUJA), Colunga, 15–18 de octubre de 2008, Libro de resúmenes , 33–34. Google Scholar


G.D. Gierliński and K. Sabath 2008. Stegosaurian footprints from the Morrison Formation of Utah and their implications for interpreting other ornithischian tracks. Oryctos 8: 29–46. Google Scholar


G. Hill 1989. Distal alluvial fan sediments from the Upper Jurassic of Portugal: Controls on their cyclicity and channel formation. Journal of the Geological Society of London 146: 539–555. Google Scholar


J.C. Kullberg , R.B. Rocha , A.F. Soares , J. Rey , P. Terrinha , A.C. Azerêdo , P. Callapez , L.V. Duarte , M.C. Kullberg , L. Martins , J.R. Miranda , C. Alves , J. Mata , J. Madeira , O. Mateus , M. Moreira , and C.R. Nogueira (in press). A Bacia Lusitaniana: Estratigrafia, Paleogeografia e Tectónica. In: R. Dias , A. Araújo , P. Terrinha , and J.C. Kullberg (eds.), Geologia de Portugal no contexte da Ibéria. Escolar Editora, Lisboa. Google Scholar


A.F. de Lapparent and G. Zbyszewski 1957. Les dinosauriens du Portugal. Mémoires des Sendees Géologiques du Portugal, nouvelle série 2: 1–63. Google Scholar


M.G. Lockley and A.P. Hunt 1998. A probable stegosaur track from the Morrison Formation of Utah. Modern Geology 23: 331–342. Google Scholar


M.G. Lockley , J.C. Garcia-Ramos , L. Pinuela , and M. Avanzini 2008. A review of vertebrate track assemblages from the Late Jurassic of Asturias, Spain, with comparative notes on coeval ichnofaunas from the western USA: implications for faunal diversity in siliciclastic facies assemblages. Oryctos 8: 53–70. Google Scholar


S.C.R. Maidment , D.B. Norman , P.M. Barrett , and P. Upchurch 2008. Systematics and phylogeny of Stegosauria (Dinosauria: Ornithischia). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 6: 367–407. Google Scholar


A.W. Martinius and S. Gowland 2011. Tide-influenced fluvial bedforms and tidal bore deposits (Late Jurassic Lourinhã Formation, Lusitanian Basin, Western Portugal). Sedimentology 58: 285–324. Google Scholar


I. Mateus , H. Mateus , M.T. Antunes , O. Mateus , P. Taquet , V. Ribeiro , and G. Manupella 1998. Upper Jurassic theropod dinosaur embryos from Lourinhã (Portugal). Memórias da Academia de Ciências de Lisboa 37: 101–110. Google Scholar


O. Mateus 2006. Late Jurassic dinosaurs from the Morrison Formation, the Lourinhã and Alcobaça Formations (Portugal), and the Tendaguru Beds (Tanzania): a comparison. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 36: 223–231. Google Scholar


O. Mateus and J. Milàn 2008. Ichnological evidence for giant ornithopod dinosaurs in the Late Jurassic Lourinhã Formation, Portugal. Oryctos 8: 45–52. Google Scholar


O. Mateus and J. Milàn 2010. A diverse Upper Jurassic dinosaur ichnofauna from central-west Portugal. Lethaia 43: 245–257. Google Scholar


O. Mateus , S.C.R. Maidment , and N.A. Christiansen 2008. A new specimen aff. Dacentrurus armatus (Dinosauria: Stegosauridae) from the Late Jurassic of Portugal. In : Tercer Congreso Latinoamericano de Paleontología de Vertebrados, Neuquén, Argentina, Livro de Resumos , 157. ProyectoDino ediciones, Neuquén. Google Scholar


O. Mateus , S. Maidment , and N. Christiansen 2009. A new long-necked “sauropod-mimic” stegosaur and the evolution of the plated dinosaurs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 276: 1815–1821. Google Scholar


O. Mateus , A. Walen , and M.T. Antunes 2006. The large theropod fauna of the Lourinhã Formation (Portugal) and its similarity to the Morrison Formation, with a description of a new species of Allosaurus. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 36: 123–129. Google Scholar


R.T. McCrea , M.G. Lockley , and C.A. Meyer 2001. The global distribution of purported ankylosaur track occurrences. In : K.C. Carpenter (ed.), The Armoured Dinosaurs , 413–454. University of Indiana Press, Bloomington. Google Scholar


J. Milàn and L.M. Chiappe 2009. First American record of the Jurassic ichnospecies Deltapodus brodricki and a review of the fossil record of stegosaurian footprints. Journal of Geology 117: 343–348. Google Scholar


J. Milàn , P. Christiansen , and O. Mateus 2005. A three-dimensionally preserved sauropod manus impression from the Upper Jurassic of Portugal: Implications for sauropod manus shape and locomotor mechanics. Kaupia, Darmstädter Beiträge zur Naturkunde 14: 47–52. Google Scholar


D.M. Mohabey 1986. Note on a dinosaur foot print from Kheda District, Gujarat. Journal of the Geological Society of India 27: 456–459. Google Scholar


J. Pais 1998. Jurassic plant macroremains from Portugal. Memórias da Academia de Ciências de Lisboa 37: 25–48. Google Scholar


X. Pereda-Suberbiola , P. Dantas , P.M. Galton , and J.L. Sanz 2005: Autopodium of the holotype of Dracopelta zbyszewskii (Dinosauria, Ankylosauria) and its type horizon and locality (Upper Jurassic: Tithonian, western Portugal). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen 235: 175–196. Google Scholar


M. Romano and M.A. Whyte 2003. Jurassic dinosaur tracks and trackways of the Cleveland Basin, Yorkshire: preservation, diversity and distribution. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 54: 185–215. Google Scholar


M. Vickaryous , T. Maryańska , and D.B. Weishampel 2004. Ankylosauria. In : D.B. Weishampel , P. Dodson , and H. Osmólska (eds.), The Dinosauria , second edition , 363–392. University of California Press, Berkeley. Google Scholar


M.A. Whyte and M. Romano 1993. Footprints of a sauropod dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic of Yorkshire. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 104: 195–199. Google Scholar


M.A. Whyte and M. Romano 1994. Probable sauropod footprints from the Middle Jurassic of Yorkshire, England. Gaia Revista de Geociencas 10: 15–26. Google Scholar


M.A. Whyte and M. Romano 2001. Probable stegosaurian dinosaur tracks from the Saltwick Formation (Middle Jurassic) of Yorkshire, England. Proceedings of the Geologist's Association 112: 45–54. Google Scholar


M.A. Whyte , M. Romano , and D.J. Elvidge 2007. Reconstruction of Middle Jurassic dinosaur- dominated communities from the vertebrate ichnofauna of the Cleveland Basin of Yorkshire, UK. Ichnos 14: 117–129. Google Scholar


L.D. Xing , G.Z. Peng , and C.K. Shu 2008. Stegosaurian skin impressions from the Upper Jurassic Shangshaximiao Formation, Zigong, Sichuan, China: a new observation. Geological Bulletin of China 27: 1049–1053. Google Scholar


P. Yadagiri and K. Ayyasami 1979. A new stegosaurian dinosaur from Upper Cretaceous sediments of south India. Journal of the Geological Society of India 20: 521–530. Google Scholar
Octávio Mateus, Jesper Milàn, Michael Romano, and Martin A. Whyte "New Finds of Stegosaur Tracks from the Upper Jurassic Lourinhã Formation, Portugal," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 56(3), 651-658, (1 September 2011).
Received: 8 April 2009; Accepted: 23 December 2010; Published: 1 September 2011

Back to Top