Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2011 The Aperture and Its Closure in an Ordovician Conulariid
Consuelo Sendino, Kamil Zágoršek, Zdeňka Vyhlasová
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The conulariids, an enigmatic fossil group believed to be of cnidarian (scyphozoan) affinity, have four-sided, acutely pyramidal exoskeletons terminated in apertural closures. To date, three main closure types have been recognised in conulariids (plicated, triangular lappets, and lobate lappets) but the first type is poorly illustrated in the literature. Here we present the first photographic illustration of an unequivocal plicated closure in Metaconularia? anomala, based on study of the rich (1700 specimens) material from the Upper Ordovician of the Prague Basin. This closure is formed by inwardly folded, triangular lappets centred on each of the four faces, with kite-shaped elements centred on the four corners forming a webbing between the lappets. Plicated closures were evidently rare in conulariids and restricted to a few Ordovician species.

Introduction

Conulariids are extinct marine organisms with a worldwide distribution and a fossil record ranging from the Ediacaran (Ivantsov and Fedonkin 2002; Van Iten et al. 2005) to the Triassic (Waterhouse 1979). Although some authors have reported Lower Jurassic conulariids (Argéliez 1856; Dana 1863; Kayser 1924; Zittel 1924, 1927), these however, remain disputable. At least 52 genera and 357 species have been described. Conulariids generally have a four-sided, acute pyramidal exoskeleton. The aperture, which is located at the widest part of the exoskeleton, can be partly or totally closed by infolding of the apertural ends or lappets.

Fossil conulariids may be preserved in the original calcium phosphate or as external moulds. A common alternative style of preservation is as an internal mould (steinkern). Exoskeletons range from a few millimetres to over 50 centimetres long (Kiderlen 1937; Boucek 1939; Lamont 1946). The shape of conulariids led some early palaeontologists to suppose that they were molluscs (Sowerby 1821; Archiac and Verneuil 1842; Sandberger 1847; Rouault 1851; McCoy 1855; Barrande 1867; Tromelin and Lebesconte 1876; Hall 1879; Lindström 1884; Barrois 1891; Holm 1893; Miller and Gurley 1896; Delgado 1897, 1908), but recent phylogenetic studies have indicated that they are scyphozoan cnidarians (Van Iten 1991; Van Iten et al. 1996, 2006).

The purpose of this note is to describe the unusual apertural closure of Metaconularia? anomala (Barrande, 1867) and compare it with other conulariids. This species has been recorded from the Drabov quartzites, Libeň and Letná formations (Sandbian) of the Barrandian area, Czech Republic (Barrande 1867; Bouček 1928; Havláček and Vaněk 1966), and also from the Ordovician of Galicia, Asturias and Guadalajara, Spain (Hernández-Sampelayo 1915, 1942: 614; see also Kindelán 1918). M.? anomala is unusual among conulariids because many individuals underwent torsion during their growth, some even losing one of the four faces and one of the corners to become three-sided in transverse section (as in Paraconularia africana [Sharpe, 1856] from Bolivia [Kiderlen 1937]).

Institutional abbreviations.—FSL, Faculté des Sciences de la Terre, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1; NHM-L, Natural History Museum, London; NHM-V, Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna; NMP, Narodni Museum, Prague.

Material

There are more than 1700 specimens of Metaconularia? anomala in the NMP. All specimens are from the Drabov quartzites, a shallow water facies of the Letná and Libeň formations (Upper Ordovician). Most come from the type locality of Drabov in the Prague Basin. The quartzite at Drabov was designated, along with the May Sandstone of Normandy, as the facies of “medusa conulariids” by Kiderlen (1937).

All studied specimens of Metaconularia? anomala in the NMP, FSL, NHM-L and NHM-V collections are steinkerns or moulds of steinkerns, probably representing individuals that were buried rapidly to preserve their morphology in three dimensions. It is difficult in steinkerns to see some of the main characters that define genera of conulariids, but accessory lines can be observed in a few specimens. These faint, very narrow vertical lines occur one third of the distance between midlines and corners. They have been interpreted as tentacular muscle tracks (Kiderlen 1937). None of about 40 specimens of M.? anomala housed in the NHM-L display these lines, but we report their presence here for the first time in specimens from the NMP (Fig. 1, arrowed).

Results

Only one specimen of M.? anomala (NM-PM2-L25097) was found to preserve a clear apertural closure (Fig. 1). According to the attached label, this specimen is the original figured by Boucek (1928: pl. 3: 13, 1939: fig. 4c), although Bouček's drawing (Fig. 2 herein) appears to be of a different specimen. The figure caption states that the drawing depicts a flattened specimen from Drabov, and seems to show two individuals side-by-side, whereas specimen NM-PM2-L25097 is solitary, not flattened and partly embedded in the matrix.

Fig. 1.

Topotype of the conulariid scyphozoan Metaconularia? anomala (Barrande, 1867) from the Drabov quartzites of Bohemia, NM-PM2-L25097. The specimen is a steinkern with a plicated apertural closure. Arrows point to accessory lines which may be muscle tracks.

f01_659.jpg

The preserved length of this incomplete specimen is about 58.3 mm, but its estimated full length would have been at least 90 mm. The apex is missing. Width at the aperture is approximately 22.5 mm. Therefore, the length/width ratio is about 3. The cross section is quadrangular (i.e., not 3-sided), and the apical angle about 15°, although this is difficult to determine accurately due to preservation. The corners are not as sharp as they are in some other specimens of M.? anomala, and the faces are slightly concave. It is possible to observe the midline marked by a groove with accessory lines forming very faint grooves about 4 mm on either side of the midline. No ornament (e.g., transverse ribs or tubercles) is visible but very gentle transverse corrugations can be perceived. The triangular apertural ends have a length of 11.3 mm, about 12% of total exoskeletal length.

As in other conulariids, the closure is formed by inwardly folded apertural ends or lappets of a triangular shape. In the case of M.? anomala (NM-PM2-L25097), however, the lappets comprise not only triangles centred on each of the four faces, but also kite-shaped elements, centred on the four corners, that form a webbing between the triangular lappets. Midlines of the kite-shaped elements are folded inwardly. Therefore, the closure contrasts with those in most conulariids in which kite-shaped elements are apparently lacking (e.g., Van Iten et al. 2008: fig. 1.5). The closure in M.? anomala corresponds to the plicated type.

Discussion

Conulariid apertures were extensively discussed by numerous authors leading to recognition of three closure types (Fig. 3) that differ in shape and mechanics. According to Kiderlen (1937), Bouček (1939), Moore and Harrington (1956), and Bischoff (1978), the three closure types are plicated, triangular lappets, and lobate lappets. A plicated closure is described above for M.? anomala. Kowalski (1935: fig. 1) published a drawing of what appears to be a plicated closure in Conularia plicosa Barrande, 1867, but this type of closure has never been clearly illustrated photographically.

In conulariids with triangular lappets (Fig. 4), the lappets become juxtaposed when the aperture closes. This type of closure, which seals the aperture completely (Bischoff 1978), is the commonest type observed among conulariids in the NHM-L collections (Sendino 2007). A comparison can be made with the closure present in the rugose coral Goniophyllum which has four triangular opercula (see Gudo 2002). However, it should be noted that some conulariids with apparently triangular closures and completely occluded apertures may in fact have plicated closures in which the kite-shaped elements are totally hidden.

Lobate lappets occur in conulariids with semicircular apertural ends that do not become juxtaposed with the adjacent or opposite ends when the aperture closes. Therefore, the aperture could not be sealed completely. Transverse ribs usually parallel the apertural margin. Bischoff (1978) believed this to be the most common type of closure, and it is found, for example, in Paraconularia tenuis (Slater, 1907).

Growth of conulariid skeletons involved extension along the apertural margin together with centripetal accretion of mineralised lamellae. Apertural closures like the one described here for MP anomala could have functioned only if the conulariid exoskeleton was flexible at the apertural margin. According to Kiderlen (1937), closure of the aperture may have been brought about by contraction of carinal muscles, located on the inner sides of the reinforced corners, that pulled the exoskeleton towards the interior. Bischoff (1978), however, supposed that taxa without any reinforcement of the corners could not have possessed muscles attached to the corners of the shell. He also assumed that in plicate closures the corners were folded inwards first, followed by the four faces.

Fig. 2.

Apertural ends in Metaconularia? anomala with a plicated type of closure as figured by Bouček (1939: fig. 4c).

f02_659.jpg

Fig. 3.

Types of closures in conulariid scyphozoans. A. Plicated type closure in Metaconularial anomala (Barrande, 1867) from the Drabov quartzites of Bohemia, NM-PM2-L25097. B. Triangular lappet type of closure in Metaconularia aspersa (Lindström, 1884) from the Lower Ludlow of Church Hill, Herefordshire, England, NHM-L-G5373. C. Lobate lappet type of closure in Paraconularia quadrisulcata (Sowerby, 1821) from the Carboniferous of Carluke, Lanarkshire, Scotland, NHM-L 46784. All are accompanied by sketches (based on Moore and Harrington 1956) showing different stages in the closure.

f03_659.jpg

Fig. 4.

Closure with triangular terminal ends in a topotype of Conularia brongniarti Archiac and Verneuil, 1842 from the Devonian of Néhou (Manche, France), FSL 15605, in apertural (A) and lateral (B) views.

f04_659.jpg

Table 1.

Studied taxa with apertural margins at the similar levels.

t01_659.gif

Moore and Harrington (1956) believed the apertural margin to be a flexion line along which the exoskeleton could be folded to close the aperture. However, Babcock and Feldmann (1986) questioned the occurrence of a distinct flexion line, being unable to find it in more than 70 specimens with closed or half-closed apertures, although they did not observe any specimens showing plicated closures like the one described herein. They also maintained that any flexion line would not be straight but rather would have to conform to the shape of the transverse ribs. This is not the case in the studied specimen of M.? anomala which has straight flexion line.

In closures formed by triangular and lobate lappets, closing the aperture using muscles pulling from the corners would produce lines of flexion (accessory and secondary lines and the midline) in each face (Kiderlen 1937: 131). As this mechanism is complex, especially when the apertural margin is oblique to the transverse ribs, it is possible that closure happened only rarely, for example during periods of dormancy.

In all specimens that we observed, the lappets are continuations of the exoskeletal faces and show the same ornamentation. These could be bent to close the aperture (totally or partially). Although Babcock and Feldmann (1986) wrote that the line of flexure is not isolatitudinal across the four faces, individuals of the following species preserved in three dimensions and with complete apertures have been observed to have apertural margins at the same approximate levels (see Table 1).

Conclusion

It is unclear why plicate closures are seen in so few species of conulariids; according to Bouček (1939) they are present only in Metaconularial anomala and M. exquisita. However, it is possible that some plicated closures could have been misidentified as triangular lappet-type closures due to inadequate preservation. A closure identified by Van Iten et al. (2008) in Conularia cf. subcarbonaria Meek and Worthen, 1865 as plicated differs considerably from the plicated closure of M.? anomala described here as it lacks the kite-shaped elements between the apertural flaps. This paper presents the first photographic illustration of an unequivocal plicated closure. It is evident that the drawing of Bouček (1928) is geometrically flawed, failing to show the kite-shaped elements that link the triangular apertural lappets at the corners of the apertural edge. The functional and phylogenetic significance of conulariid closure has yet to be fully explored.

Acknowledgements.

We thank Martin Valent and Radek Labut'a (NMP) and Abel Prieur (FSL) who assisted us in gaining access to material. We also thank Jill Darrell (NHM-L) for her valuable comments. Sincere thanks are given to our colleague Paul D. Taylor (Natural History Museum, London) who kindly read the original manuscript and helped with the revision. This work was conducted as a part of IGCP 503 (International Geoscience Programme on Ordovician Palaeogeography and Palaeoclimate) Working Group supported by UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) and the IUGS (International Union of Geological Sciences) and a SYNTHESYS grant (ES-TAF-651). The study of Bohemian material was supported by grant of Ministry of Culture of Czech Republic number DE06P04OMG009.

References

1.

E.D. Archiac and E. de. Verneuil 1842. On the fossils of the older deposits of the Renish provinces, preceded by a general survey of the fauna of the Paleozoic rocks, and the followed by a tabular list of the organic remains of the Devonian System in Europe. Transactions of the Geological Society of London 6: 303–410. Google Scholar

2.

M. Argéliez 1856. Lettre à E. de Beaumont. Bulletin Société géologique de France 13: 186–188. Google Scholar

3.

L.E. Babcock and R.M. Feldmann 1986. The Phylum Conulariida. In : A. Hoffman and M.H. Nitecki (eds.), Problematic Fossil Taxa , 135–147. Oxford University Press, New York. Google Scholar

4.

J. Barrande 1867. Systême Silurien du Centre de la Bohême. lère. Partie Recherches Paléontologiques, Classe des Mollusques. Ordre des Ptéropodes 3. i–xv +179 pp. J. Barrande and W. Waagen, Prague. Google Scholar

5.

C. Barrois 1891. Mémorie sur la Faune du Grés armoricain. Annales de la Société Géologique du Nord 19 : 134–237. Google Scholar

6.

G.C.O. Bischoff 1978. Internal structures of conulariid tests and their functional significance, with special reference to Circoconulariina n. suborder (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa). Senckenbergiana lethaea 59: 275–327. Google Scholar

7.

B. Bouček 1928. Revise ceských paleozoických Konularii (Revision des conulaires Paléozoiques de la Bohême). Palaeontographica Bohemiae 11: 1–108. Google Scholar

8.

B. Bouček 1939. Conularida. In : O.H. Schindewolf (ed.), Handbuch der Paläozoologie. Verlag von Gerbruder Borntraeger 2A: A113–A131. Google Scholar

9.

J.D. Dana 1863. Manual of Geology: Treating of the Principles of the Science with Special Reference to American Geological History, for the Use of Colleges, Academies , and Schools of Science. 798 pp. Theodore Bliss and Co., Philadelphia. Google Scholar

10.

J.F.N. Delgado 1897. Fauna Silurica de Portugal: novas obsevaçõe ácerca de Lichas (Uralichas) Ribeiroi. 34 pp. Direcção dos trabalhos geologicos de Portugal, Academia Real das Sciencias, Lisboa. Google Scholar

11.

J.F.N. Delgado 1908. Système Silurique du Portugal. Étude de Stratigraphie Paléontologique. 247 pp. Commission du Service géologique du Portugal, Lisbonne. Google Scholar

12.

M. Gudo 2002. Structural-functional aspects in the evolution of operculate corals (Rugosa). Palaeontology 45: 671–687. Google Scholar

13.

J. Hall 1879. Geological Survey of the State of New York. Paleontology 5. Containing Descriptions of the Gasteropoda, Pteropoda, and Cephalopoda of the Upper Helderberg, Hamilton, Portage and Chemung Groups. 492 pp. Geological Survey of New York, Van Benthuysen and Sons, Albany, New York. Google Scholar

14.

V. Havlíček and J. Vaněk 1966. The Biostratigraphy of the Ordovician of Bohemia. Sborník Geologických Ved 8: 7–68. Google Scholar

15.

P. Hernández-Sampelayo 1915. Fosiles de Galicia. Nota sobre la fauna paleozoica de la provincia de Lugo. Boletin del Instituto Geologico de España 36: 277–303. Google Scholar

16.

P. Hernández-Sampelayo 1942. Explicación del nuevo mapa geológico de España II. El sistema siluriano. Memorias del Instituto Geológico y Minero de España 2: 593–848. Google Scholar

17.

G. Holm 1893. Sveriges Kambrish—Siluriska Hyolithidae och Conulariidae. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning. Afhandlinger och uppsatser C112: 1–172. Google Scholar

18.

A.Y. Ivantsov and M. Fedonkin 2002. Conulariid-like fossil from the Vendian of Russia: a metazoan clade across the Proterozoic/Palaezoic boundary. Palaeontology 4: 1219–1229. Google Scholar

19.

E. Kayser 1924. Lehrbuch der geologischen Formationskunde, Band 2. Jura-, Kreide-, Tertiär- und Quartärformation. Nachträgepp. 657 pp. Verlag Von Ferdinand Enke, Stuttgart. Google Scholar

20.

H. Kiderlen 1937. Die Conularien. Über Bau und Leben der ersten Scyphozoa. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie 77: 113–169. Google Scholar

21.

V. Kindelán 1918. Criaderos de hierro de las provincias de Guadalajara y Teruel. Memorias del Instituto Geológico de España, Criaderos de hierro en España 3: 1–176. Google Scholar

22.

J. Kowalski 1935. Les Conulaires. Quelques observations sur leur structure anatomique. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Naturelles de l'Ouest de la France 5 (5): 281–293. Google Scholar

23.

A. Lamont 1946. Largest British Conularia. Quarry Manager's Journal 29: 569–570. Google Scholar

24.

G. Lindström 1884. On the Silurian Gastropoda and Pteropoda of Gotland. Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar 19: 1–250. Google Scholar

25.

F. McCoy 1855. Systematic description of the British Palaeozoic fossils in the Geological Museum of the University of Cambridge. In : A. Sedgwick (ed.), A Sypnosis of the Classification of the British Palaeozoic Rocks. 661 pp. MacMillan and Co., London. Google Scholar

26.

S.A. Miller and W.G.E. Gurley 1896. New species of Paleozoic invertebrates from Illinois and other States. Bulletin of the Illinois State Museum of Natural History 11: 1–50. Google Scholar

27.

R.C. Moore and H.J. Harrington 1956. Conulata. In : R.C. Moore (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Coelenterata , F54–F66. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, New York. Google Scholar

28.

M. Rouault 1851. Memoire sur le terrain paleozoique des environs de Rennes. Bulletin de la Societe geologique de France 8: 358–399. Google Scholar

29.

G. Sandberger 1847. Die Flossenfüsser oder Pteropoda der ersten Erdbildungs-Epoche. Conularia und Coleoprion. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie 1847: 8–25. Google Scholar

30.

L.M.C. Sendino 2007. Revisión de la colección de Conulariidae de The Natural History Museum de Londres (Reino Unido) , 601 pp. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid. Google Scholar

31.

J. Sowerby 1821. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain; or Coloured Figures and Descriptions of those Remains of Testaceous Animals or Shells, Which Have Been Preserved at Various Times, and Depths in The Earth, 3. 194 pp. W. Arding Company, London. Google Scholar

32.

G. de Tromelin and P. Lebesconte 1876. Essai d'un catalogue raisonné des fossiles siluriens des départements de Maine-et-Loire, de la Loirelnférieure et du Morbihan, avec des observations sus les terrains paléozoïques de l'Ouest de la France. Comptes Rendus de la 4ème session de l'Association Française pour l'Avancement de la Science , 601–661. Nantes. Google Scholar

33.

J.B. Waterhouse 1979. Permian and Triassic conulariid species from New Zealand. Journal of Royal Society of New Zealand 9: 475–489. Google Scholar

34.

H.T. Van Iten 1991. Evolutionary affinities of the conulariids. In : A.M. Simonetta and S. Conway Morris (eds.), The Early Evolution of Metazoa and the Significance of Problematic Taxa , 145–155. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar

35.

H.T. Van Iten , A. Fitzke , and R.S. Cox 1996. Problematical fossil cnidarians from the Upper Ordovician of the north-central USA. Journal of Paleontology 39: 1037–1064. Google Scholar

36.

H. Van Iten , J.M. Lerne , M. Guimaraes Simões , A. Carlos Marques , and A.G. Collins 2006. Reassessment of the phylogenetic position of conulariids (?Ediacaran—Triassic) within the subphylum Medusozoa (Phylum Cnidaria). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 4: 109–118. Google Scholar

37.

H. Van Iten , J.M. Lerne , S.C. Rodrigues , and M.G. Simões 2005. Reinterpretation of a conulariid-like fossil from the Vendian of Russia. Palaeontology 48: 619–622. Google Scholar

38.

H. Van Iten , M. Konate , and Y. Moussa 2008. Conulariids of the Upper Talak Formation (Mississippian, Visean) of Northern Niger (West Africa). Journal of Paleontology 82: 192–196. Google Scholar

39.

K.A. von Zittel 1924. Grundzüge der Paläontologie (Paläozoologie). I. Invertebrata [6th ed.]. viii + 733 pp. Von F. Broili, R. Oldenbourg, Berlin. Google Scholar

40.

K.A. von Zittel 1927. Text-book of Paleontology 1. 839 pp. MacMillan, London. Google Scholar
Consuelo Sendino, Kamil Zágoršek, and Zdeňka Vyhlasová "The Aperture and Its Closure in an Ordovician Conulariid," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 56(3), 659-663, (1 September 2011). https://doi.org/10.4202/app.2010.0028
Received: 17 March 2010; Accepted: 13 December 2010; Published: 1 September 2011
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top