Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2011 Spatiotemporal Signals and Palaeoenvironments of Endemic Molluscan Assemblages in the Marine System of the Sarmatian Paratethys
Susanne Lukeneder, Martin Zuschin, Mathias Harzhauser, Oleg Mandic
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The present study is the first quantitative comparison of Sarmatian mollusc assemblages from the Central and Eastern Paratethys seas. The assemblages (47,840 shells, 32 samples, 84 species) derive from eight Middle and Upper Miocene localities covering an interval from 12.7–11.0 Ma, when a highly endemic mollusc fauna flourished in the entire Paratethys. Cluster analysis of samples yields two major clusters: one composed of late Sarmatian (Bessarabian) collections and the other composed of early Sarmatian (Volhynian) collections. The Volhynian cluster includes two subclusters: the first reflects a strong stratigraphie signal because it combines samples from the Mohrensternia Zone of the Vienna Basin and the western Ukraine. The second combines samples from the Upper Ervilia Zone of the Vienna Basin with samples from the Mohrensternia Zone of the Vienna Basin and Romania. Cluster analysis of species indicates that the sample clusters represent different palaeoenvironments with distinct molluscan assemblages: The Volhynian well-agitated shore is characterized by the Granulolabium—Venerupis—Ervilia biofacies, the Volhynian muddy foreshore by the Granulolabium—Mohrensternia—Ervilia biofacies, and the Bessarabian shallow to medium deep sublittoral by the Hydrobia—Venerupis—Pseudamnicola biofacies. Although not all biozones and regions of the Sarmatian Sea are covered, we suggest that these biofacies cover a wide range of possible assemblage compositions of Sarmatian nearshore and shallow-water assemblages.

Introduction

During the Middle Miocene, at 12.7 Ma, the Paratethys Sea became almost completely separated from the Mediterranean basins (Rögl and Steininger 1984; Rögl 1998; Popov et al. 2004). The semi-enclosed sea extended from eastern Austria to the Caucasus (Fig. 1) and was populated by an increasingly endemic fauna with comparatively low number of species but high morphological variety (Rögl and Steininger 1984; Rögl 1998, 1999; Harzhauser and Kowalke 2002; Harzhauser and Piller 2004a, b). The so-called Paratethyan mollusc faunas are characterised by their morphological exuberance, high diversity and endemism (Wesselingh et al. 2008). Cox and Moore (1993) as well as Hills et al. (1996) defined endemism as the restriction of a taxon or a community to a particular geographical area. Evolutionary processes, like speciation, extinction and community turnover can be inferred by patterns of endemism (Simison 2006). Increased endemism as well as reduced diversity are the results of ecological isolation (Diamond 1972; Wilcox 1978; Brown and Gibson 1983; Case and Cody 1987; Case et al. 1992; Myers and Giller 1988; Simison 2006). During the Volhynian, the Central and Eastern Paratethys were united and offer a strikingly similar faunistic inventory (Kolesnikov 1935; Papp 1974b; Harzhauser and Piller 2004b).

The mollusc fauna of the Vienna Basin and the Pannonian Basin System has been intensively studied, but quantitative data allowing further correlation with the Eastern Paratethys are sparse. Moreover molluscs have mostly been used for stratigraphie zonation (Fig. 2; Papp 1954; Harzhauser and Piller 2004b), but palaeocommunity comparisons are lacking. The present study was designed to provide the first quantitative comparison of Sarmatian, respectively Volhynian and Bessarabian, mollusc assemblages from the Eastern and Central Paratethys, to test the role of spatial and temporal factors and to decipher their palaeoenvironments. For this purpose, 47,840 shells from 32 samples with 84 species from 8 localities were quantitatively compared (Tables 1,2). The abundant species are listed (Table 3) and figured (Figs. 3, 4).

Table 1.

Number of samples per time interval and region.

t01_767.gif

Table 2.

Stratigraphic, environmental, and sedimentological assignment for each sample.

t02_767.gif

Other abbreviation.—NAFB, North Alpine Foreland Basin.

Geologic and stratigraphic setting

The term Sarmatian is based on endemic mollusc faunas and is therefore restricted to the Paratethys (Papp 1974a). The Sarmatian of the Central Paratethys spans an interval from 12.7 to 11.6 Ma and represents a marine sea with endemic fauna. Due to geodynamic processes, this development terminates with the onset of the Late Miocene, when Lake Pannon formed within the Pannonian Basin System. In the Eastern Paratethys, no such interruption took place, and marine conditions lasted far into the Late Miocene (Harzhauser and Piller 2004b). Due to these palaeogeographical differences in the durations of marine conditions the term “Sarmatian sensu strico” is used for the Central Paratethys. The rapid endemic evolution and the switch from siliciclastic to carbonate sedimentation allowed a further subdivision into eco-biozones: The Mohrensternia Zone, the Lower and Upper Ervilia zones, and the Sarmatimactra vitaliana Zone. These eco-biozones are an ecostratigraphic zonation based on molluscs and benthic foraminifera, used solely for Sarmatian deposits sensu stricto of the Central Paratethys (Papp 1954, 1956; Rögl 1998; Harzhauser and Piller 2004b).

Fig. 1.

Volhynian and Bessarabian paleogeography of the Paratethys. A. Middle Miocene: Early Sarmatian (Volhynian), after Rögl (1998). Entire Paratethys (A1), close-up of the Central Paratethys (A2). B. Late Miocene (late Bessarabian), after Rögl and and Steininger (1984).

f01_767.jpg

Based on the mollusc fauna, Papp (1956) differentiated the Sarmatian sensu stricto into 5 horizons (Papp and Senes 1974):

  • (1) Mohrensternia Zone: This eco-biozone is the basal part of the Sarmatian succession. It is defined by a fauna of relatively small-bodied taxa, dominated by certain species of the genera Mohrensternia as well as small cardiid bivalves, Abra, small Ervilia, and some Mactra (< 2 cm).

  • (2) Lower Ervilia Zone: This eco-biozone is defined by deposits containing different genera of Ervilia and Potamides as well as large cardiids.

  • (3) Upper Ervilia Zone: This eco-biozone shows the most diverse mollusc fauna of the Sarmatian. Different species of large Ervilia and cardiids such as Obsoletiforma vindobonensis are typical.

  • (4) Mactra-beds: Marked by the decline of some species (e.g., different species of Ervilia and Cerithium) in the Sarmatimactra vitaliana Zone. Large shells of Sarmatimactra vitaliana and Venerupis tricuspis are typical.

  • (5) Pauperization Zone: This eco-biozone is characterised by small cardiid bivalves, Cerithium hartbergensis as well as some rudimentary species of Venerupis, Donax and solenids, along with rare species of Cryptomactra.

Table 3.

Five most common species found per locality (in percent).

t03_767.gif

Fig. 2.

Middle-Late Miocene stratigraphie correlation between the Mediterranean and Paratethys areas (modified after Harzhauser and Piller 2004b). Khers, Khersonian.

f02_767.jpg

Subsequently, the term Sarmatian was also used for deposits formed in the Eastern Paratethys of Eastern Europe and Asia. In this area, the term Sarmatian has to be abandoned and must be replaced by the regional stages Volhynian, Bessarabian, and Khersonian (Harzhauser and Piller 2004a, b). Of these, only the Volhynian and the lower Bessarabian have marine equivalents in the Central Paratethys (Papp and Senes 1974; Piller and Harzhauser 2005) (Fig. 2).

Localities

Four localities were sampled in the northern Vienna Basin (Siebenhirten, Kettlasbrunn, Hauskirchen, and Nexing; Fig. 5A). Descriptions and stratigraphie correlations are presented in Harzhauser and Piller (2004a, b, 2010). The 11-m-thick Siebenhirten section (12.7-12.4 Ma) is located approximately 5 km northwest from Mistelbach and belongs to the regional Mohrensternia Zone (Harzhauser and Piller 2004b). The basal part is represented by fluvial gravel which was shed through a drainage system of the North Alpine Foreland Basin (NAFB) into the northwestern Vienna Basin during a sea level low stand at the Badenian/Sarmatian boundary (Mandic et al. 2008). The subsequent flooding of the NAFB during the Mohrensternia Zone and the abrupt transgression led to the deposition of marine clay, from which our samples were taken (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 3.

Most abundant taxa of bivalves from outcrops of the ancient Central Paratethys (Siebenhirten, Kettlasbrunn, Nexing, Hauskirchen, Soceni Politioanâ, and Zhabiak) and from outcrops of the ancient Eastern Paratethys (Jurkino and Zavjetnoje). A. NHMW-2011/0272/0001, Musculus sarmaticus (Gatuev, 1916), Zavjetnoje, Bessarabian. B. NHMW-2011/0268/0001, Mytilaster volhynicus (Eichwald, 1829), Kettlasbrunn, Upper Ervilia Zone. C. NHMW-2011/0268/0002, Obsoletiforma vindobonensis Laskarev, 1903, Kettlasbrunn, Upper Ervilia Zone. D. NHMW-2011/0272/0002, Mactra andrussowi Kolesnikov, 1925, Zavjetnoje, Bessarabian. E. NHMW-2011/0271/0001, Abra reflexa (Eichwald, 1830), Jurkino, Bessarabian. F. NHMW2011/0268/0003, Donax dentiger Eichwald, 1830, Kettlasbrunn, Upper Ervilia Zone. G. NHMW-2011/0269/0001, Ervilia dissita (Eichwald, 1830), Hauskirchen, Upper Ervilia Zone. H. NHMW-2011/0266/0001, Mytilopsis ramphophora (Brusina, 1892), Soceni Politioanâ, Mohrensternia Zone. I. NHMW-2011/0269/0002, Venerupis tricuspis Eichwald, 1830, Hauskirchen, Upper Ervilia Zone.

f03_767.jpg

The sections Kettlasbrunn (11.9 Ma), Hauskirchen, and Nexing (12.1–11.9 Ma) belong to the regional Upper Ervilia Zone. The chronostratigraphic calibrations follow the proposed relation to isotopic events (Harzhauser and Piller 2004b). During that time, the northwestern margin of the Vienna Basin was covered by extensive ooid shoals, with sandy beaches, tidal channels and dunes of ooids and shell-hash. At Kettlasbrunn, 5 km east of Mistelbach (Fig. 5A), such unlithified sand of loose shell-hash is exposed. The lower part of the 3-m-thick section consists of 2 m of fine to medium sand containing cross-bedded sand layers with bivalves, overlain by about 1.30 m of oolitic sandstone. The samples from Kettlasbrunn were all taken from the lower part of the section (shown in Fig. 5C).

Hauskirchen is situated approximately 15 km northeast of Mistelbach (Fig. 5A). Papp (1954, 1956) placed the mollusc assemblages of this locality into the Upper Ervilia Zone and proved this by the occurrence of the indicative foraminifera Porosononion granosum. The 3-m-thick section starts with 1.6 m of fine unlithified sand containing dispersed bivalves and gastropods. Upsection, the sand is increasingly replaced by unlithified oolitic sand and finally by a more than 1-m-thick bed of massive oolitic limestone. While sample Hauskirchen 4 was taken from the lower part of the section, samples Hauskirchen 1, 2, and 3 derive from the overlying 0.5 m of oolitic sand (Fig. 5D).

Nexing, the holostratotype of the Sarmatian stage, is located approximately 10 km southeast from Mistelbach (Fig. 5A). The deposits are dated as Upper Ervilia Zone and lowermost Sarmatimactra vitaliana Zone (Harzhauser and Piller 2010). The section is outstanding for its sedimentological features, with huge shell dunes consisting of up to 81% of shell hash of marine bivalves and gastropods (Fig. 5E). According to Harzhauser and Piller (2010), the 13-m-high fore-sets are part of a flood tidal-delta.

In the Pannonian Basin System, samples were taken in the Politioană valley of Soceni, located in northwest Romania (350 km northwest of Bucharest) (Fig. 6). The mollusc fauna derives from a 5.5-m-thick succession of siliciclastic deposits of Early Sarmatian age (12.5 Ma; Mohrensternia Zone) which transgress on the crystalline basement. Intense synsedimentary reworking is indicated by bryozoan-limestone clasts (Fig. 7). The mollusc fauna, too, represents a mixture of shallow marine taxa with freshwater molluscs and even rare terrestrial gastropods (Jekelius 1944).

Fig. 4.

Abundant taxa of gastropods from outcrops of the ancient Central Paratethys (Siebenhirten, Kettlasbrunn, Nexing, Hauskirchen, Soceni Politioană, and Zhabiak) and from the ancient Eastern Paratethys (Jurkino and Zavjetnoje). A. NHMW-2011/0269/0003, Gibbula angulata (Eichwald, 1853), Hauskirchen, Upper Ervilia Zone. B. NHMW-2011/0266/0002, Gibbula banatica (Jekelius, 1944), Soceni Politioanä, MohrensterniĂ, Zone. C. NHMW2011/0271/0002, Gibbula urupensis (Uspenski, 1927), Jurkino, Bessarabian. D. NHMW-2011/0272/0003, Gibbula sp. 1, Zavjetnoje, Bessarabian. E. NHMW-2011/0266/0003, Theodoxus politus Jekelius, 1944, in apical (E1) and apertural (E2) views, Soceni Politioană, Mohrensternia Zone. F. NHMW-2011/0266/0004, Theodoxus soceni Jekelius 1944, in apical (F1) and apertural (F2) views, Soceni Politioanä, Mohrensternia Zone. G. NHMW2011/0266/0005, Cerithium rubiginosum (Eichwald, 1853), adult, Soceni Politioană, Mohrensternia Zone. H. NHMW-2011/0269/0004, Cerithium rubiginosum (Eichwald, 1853), juvenile, Hauskirchen, Upper Ervilia Zone. I. NHMW-2011/0266/0006, Granulolabium bicinctum (Brocchi, 1814), adult, Soceni Politioană, Mohrensternia Zone. J. NHMW-2011/0266/0007, Granulolabium bicinctum (Brocchi, 1814), juvenile, Soceni Politioanä, Mohrensternia Zone. K. NHMW-2011/0269/0005, Potamides disjunctus (Sowerby, 1831), Hauskirchen, Upper Ervilia Zone. L. NHMW-2011/0266/0008, Melanopsis impressa (Krauss, 1852), adult, Soceni Politioanä, Mohrensternia Zone. M. NHMW-2011/0266/0009, Melanopsis impressa (Krauss, 1852), juvenile, Soceni Politioană, Mohrensternia Zone. N. NHMW-2011/0267/0001, Mohrensternia pseudoangulata Hilber, 1897, Siebenhirten, Mohrensternia Zone. O. NHMW-2011/0267/0002, Mohrensternia inflata (Andrzejowsky, 1835), Siebenhirten, Mohrensternia Zone. P. NHMW-2011/0266/0010, Pseudamnicola sarmatica Jekelius, 1944, Soceni Politioană, Mohrensternia Zone. Q. NHMW-2011/0272/0004, Pseudamnicola cyclostomoides (Sinzov, 1880), Zavjetnoje, Bessarabian. R. NHMW-2011/0271/0003, Pseudamnicola sp., Jurkino, Bessarabian. S. NHMW-2011/0271/0004, Pseudamnicola sp. 2., Jurkino, Bessarabian. T. NHMW-2011/0266/0011, Hydrobia sp., Soceni Politioanä, Mohrensternia Zone. U. NHMW-2011/0272/0005, Akburunella akburunensis (Andrussow, 1902), Zavjetnoje, Bessarabian. V. NHMW-201 1/0272/0006, Akburunella akburunensis (Andrussow, 1902), Zavjetnoje, Bessarabian. W. NHMW-2011/0268/0004, Acteocina lajonkaireana Basterot, 1825, Kettlasbrunn, Upper Ervilia Zone. X. NHMW-2011/0271/0005, Retusa truncatula (Bruguière, 1792), Jurkino, Bessarabian.

f04_767.jpg

On the Volhyno-Podolian Plate (Galets'kyi 2007), sediments of the Zhabiak locality, located in the Ukraine, 150 km east of the Polish border, were studied (Fig. 6). The section comprises Badenian and Lower Sarmatian deposits. The uppermost 7 m of the 24-m-thick section are of Sarmatian age (12.7 Ma; Mohrensternia Zone) and comprise unhthified fine to coarse sand containing a microbialite-serpulid-bioherm. Upsection follow 3 m of dark grey to brown clay of Pleistocene age (Fig. 8). Samples were taken from tempestitic shell beds.

In the Indol-Kuban Basin, sediments of the Jurkino and Zavjetnoje localities were studied. They belong to the western part of the Eastern Paratethys. Both are located in the eastern part of the Crimea Peninsula (Kertch, Ukraine; Fig. 6) and are part of the Indol-Kuban Basin (Galets'kyi 2007). The deposits of both sections are of Bessarabian age (11.5–11.2 Ma) (Fig. 2). Marl and oolitic limestone, along with diatomite and diatomitic marl predominate (Andrussow 1911), and both sections are interpreted here as shallow to moderately deep sublittoral. The Jurkino section has a thickness of about 50 m of diatomitic marls, silts and cross-bedded oolite sands (Fig. 9). The mollusc samples (Jurkino 1 and 2a–c) are taken from the lowermost 2 m of the log. Sample Jurkino 7 was taken from scattered shell beds of the topmost clayey part (48 m). The approximately 32.7-m-thick section of Zavjetnoje (Fig. 10) alternates between clay, silt, and fine sand. Towards the top, the sedimentation becomes increasingly diatomitic. The whole section contains numerous shell beds.

Material and methods

Sample preparation.—The samples from Zhabiak (Ukraine) and Soceni (Romania) were taken in 2001. Samples from the Crimea Peninsula (Ukraine, Jurkino and Zavjetnoje) and from the Vienna Basin (Hauskirchen, Nexing, Siebenhirten, and Kettlasbrunn) were taken in 2008. For each outcrop a log was provided and mollusc samples collected.

The sediment was sieved with 4, 2, and 1 mm size meshes, air dried, and split to a workable size. Thirty-two samples, with a median sample size of 1061.5 specimens, were studied. Molluscs were picked under a binocular microscope. This yielded 47,840 shells representing 13 species from 13 bivalve genera, and 71 species from 26 gastropod genera. The taxonomy and systematics are in accordance with the determinations of Friedberg (1911–1928), Kolesnikov (1935), Simonescu and Barbu (1940), Jekelius (1944), Papp (1954, 1956, 1974b), Kojumdgieva (1969, 1987), Švagrovsky (1971), Harzhauser and Kowalke (2004), Kowalke and Harzhauser (2004), Nevesskaja et al. (1993), and Bouchet and Rocroi (2005).

Statistical methods.—The statistical analyses were performed with the program PAST version 1.82 (Hammer et al. 2001). All analyses are based on arcsine-root transformed percentages of the species within each sample (Linder and Berchtold 1976).

To detect hierarchical groupings within the data set, we applied paired group cluster analysis using the Bray-Curtis similarity index. All species represented by less than 20 individuals were removed from the data set. Also, sample Jurkino 7 was not included because of its low number of species (n = 1).

To test the significance of the differences between localities, analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) was applied, based on the Bray-Curtis similarity coefficient (Bray and Curtis 1957; Clarke and Warwick 1994). Several palaeoecological analyses have used ANOSIM to measure temporal turnover in composition (e.g., Casanovas-Vilar and Agusti 2007; Zuschin et al. 2007; Sallan and Coates 2010). Global R values were always highly significant, but for individual comparisons the significance values can often be low, because of few replicates in each group. We therefore also used the pairwise R values, which give an absolute measure of how separated the groups are. R values can range from 0 (indistinguishable) to 1 (all similarities within groups are less than any similarity between groups) (Clarke and Gorley 2001). R values > 0.75, groups well separated; R values > 0.5, groups overlapping but clearly different; R values > 0.25, groups strongly overlapping; R values < 0.25, groups barely separable (Tables 46). As the number of samples per group is different, however, variable dispersion can also be a reason for significant R values of ANOSIM (Anderson 2001).

Results

All studied localities are strongly dominated by just a few species (Table 3, Figs. 11,12), but samples cluster according to region and stratigraphy (Fig. 13). At a similarity level of 0.3 the Bessarabian samples of the Crimean region form one cluster and the Volhynian samples two clusters (V1, V2). In cluster V2, all samples are from the Mohrensternia Zone, but they are from different regions (Vienna Basin and western Ukraine). In cluster V1, nearly all samples are from the Vienna Basin and two are from Soceni (Romania). Most samples here are from the Upper Ervilia Zone, but three are from the Mohrensternia Zone (Siebenhirten 3, both samples from Soceni).

Most species are restricted to stages and/or regions, but some have wider distributions. Species occurring in all regions and all stages are the gastropods Acteocina lajonkaireana and Hydrobia spp., and the bivalves Mytilaster volhynicus, Venerupis tricuspis, Musculus sarmticus, and Blinia pseudolaevigata. Some species are restricted to the Volhynian but occur in several regions. These include the gastropods Granulolabium bicinctum, Mohrensternia spp., and Cerithium rubiginosum and the bivalves Ervilia dissita and Abra reflexa. The gastropod Retusa truncatula is an outlier because it occurs with low numbers in few samples from different regions (Vienna Basin, western Ukraine). In accordance with these distinct distribution patterns, the R-mode cluster A is characterised by species that are restricted to samples from the Bessarabian of the Crimean region. Exceptions are Musculus sarmaticus and Blinia pseudolaevigata. Species of cluster B are most widespread in Volhynian samples, mostly from the Vienna Basin, although some occur in Bessarabian samples as well (Acteocina lajonkaireana, Hydrobia spp., and Venerupis tricuspis). Cluster C is characterised by species that are rare and only occur in samples from Soceni (Romania); an exception is Gibbula banaticum, which was also found in samples from Zhabiak (western Ukraine). Species of Cluster D are largely restricted to Volhynian samples from different regions (Vienna Basin, western Ukraine, and Romania).

Fig. 5.

A. Northern Vienna Basin (grey area) within Alpine-Carpathian units and positions of the localities Siebenhirten, Kettlasbrunn, Hauskirchen and Nexing. B-E. Logs of the localities Siebenhirten (B), Kettlasbrunn (C), Hauskirchen (D), Nexing (E) (modified after Harzhauser and Piller 2004b).

f05_767.jpg

The three Q-mode clusters represent different shallow-water environments of the Volhynian and Bessarabian and are characterised by distinct biofacies. The Volhynian cluster V1 includes mostly samples from well-agitated shores of the Vienna Basin and from Soceni (Romania) and is characterised by the Granulolabium—Venerupis—Ervilia assemblage. The taxa of this assemblage are typical inhabitants of tidal flats and shallow subtidal sediments. Within this cluster the samples from Soceni (Romania) stand out because they include a quite high abundance of taxa which tolerate freshwater like Melanopsis impressa, Theodoxus spp., and Mytilopsis ramphophora (Fig. 13: lb). The Volhynian cluster V2 comprises samples from a muddy foreshore of Zhabiak (western Ukraine) and Siebenhirten (Vienna Basin). These samples are characterised by the Granulolabium—Ervilia— Mohrensternia assemblage (Fig. 13: 2). These taxa are inhabitants of a muddy bottom, and Mohrensternia indicates a phytal cover. Within this cluster the two samples from Siebenhirten have higher abundances of Granulolabium bicinctum, while the Zhabiak samples show higher abundances of Ervilia dissita and Mohrensternia spp.

The Bessarabian cluster includes samples from a shallow to moderately deep sublittoral of Zavjetnoje and Jurkino (Crimean region). This cluster is characterised by the Hydrobia—Venerupis—Pseudamnicola assemblage (Fig. 13: 3). Musculus sarmaticus and Mactra andrussowi are also quite abundant within these samples. These species are typical inhabitants of sandy shallow to moderately deep sublittoral sediments.

Both Bessarabian localities (Jurkino and Zavjetnoje) are significantly different from almost all Volhynian localities (Table 4). Among the Volhynian localities, overlapping assemblages are present in the Vienna Basin between Siebenhirten and Nexing, between Siebenhirten in the Vienna Basin and Zhabiak in the western Ukraine, as well as between Siebenhirten (Vienna Basin) and Soceni (Romania). In accordance with these results, the regional comparison shows overlapping assemblages of the Vienna Basin with western Ukraine and Romania. All other regions differ strongly from each other (Table 5). Among stratigraphie units, the samples from the Mohrensternia Zone (Vienna Basin, Romania, western Ukraine) and the Upper Ervilia Zone (Vienna Basin) have overlapping but still significantly different assemblages. The Bessarabian, however, differs strongly from both Volhynian biozones (Table 6).

Fig. 6.

Geographie and geological position of the outcrops Soceni (Romania), Zhabiak, Jurkino, and Zavjetnoje (Ukraine).

f06_767.jpg

Discussion

Background.—Because of the absence of stenohaline biota, such as radiolarians, planktic foraminifera, corals and echinoderms, the Sarmatian stage was interpreted in the Central Paratethys as transitional between the marine Badenian and the lacustrine Pannonian stages (Papp 1954, 1956; Turnovsky 1963; Bretenská 1974; Seneš 1974; Steininger and Wessely 2000). Brackish character of the Sarmatian Sea was also suggested based on fibre cement and the common occurrence of ooids (Pisera 1996). In contrast, Jámbor (1978) assumed normal to hypersaline conditions based on the presence of evaporites within Sarmatian deposits. More recently, Piller and Harzhauser (2005) documented a complex succession, starting with a mixohaline and eutrophic early Sarmatian Sea that became replaced by a marine to hypersaline, carbonate-oversaturated sea during the late Sarmatian. This process coincides with a switch in sedimentation from siliciclastic sediments to carbonate deposits (Piller and Harzhauser 2005) and explains the strongly changing composition of the endemic mollusc fauna. Interrupted seaways into the Mediterranean/Indo-Pacific (Rögl 1998; Piller and Harzhauser 2005), caused by the sea level drop at the Badenian/Sarmatian boundary, prohibited the re-immigration of the stenohaline biota. Due to an opening of a seaway into the Mediterranean Sea, the late Sarmatian Sea ranged from fully marine to hypersaline conditions with a highly productive carbonate factory (oolite shoals, mass occurrence of thick-shelled molluscs and larger foraminifera) (see Piller and Harzhauser 2005). Moreover, within almost isolated systems, molluscs (especially gastropods) typically undergo conspicuous radiations reflecting habitat- or biotic complexity (Michel 1994). Several endemic radiations within the Paratethys occurred during the Neogene (Geary 1990), and Papp (1954) was among the first to use molluscs to arrange a biostratigraphical zonation of Sarmatian deposits from the Central Paratethys. So far, however, we lack any quantitative comparison of molluscan assemblages from the Central and Eastern Paratethys or a palaeoenvironmental interpretation.

Fig. 7.

Log of Soceni-Politioanâ, Romania (Pannonian Basin).

f07_767.jpg

Spatial and temporal signals.—In our dataset, the samples from Jurkino and Zavjetnoje are of Bessarabian age and from the Crimean region; they are therefore temporally and spatially strongly separated from all other samples. Within the Bessarabian / Crimean cluster, the samples group according to localities (Fig. 13).

Among the Volhynian localities, samples cluster roughly according to biozones (Mohrensternia Zone versus Upper Ervilia Zone), but the samples from Soceni and one sample from Siebenhirten are an exception. They belong to the Mohrensternia Zone, but group among the localities of the Upper Ervilia Zone (which otherwise are all from the Vienna Basin). The gastropod Mohrensternia serves as the best example of a strong temporal signal because it combines samples from the Vienna Basin (Siebenhirten) and the western Ukraine (Zhabiak).

Palaeoenvironments.—Throughout the Volhynian and Bessarabian, coastal zones and shoals of the Paratethys were dominated by sandy shores and ooid formations whilst deeper marine settings are indicated by pelitic deposits. These lithologies are well documented in the studied sections. Despite these persistent lithofacies, the biofacies display considerably differences as shown in our analysis.

The three biofacies, as determined by the combination of the R-mode and Q-mode cluster analysis (Fig. 13), can be used to interpret three distinct palaeoenvironments. Well-agitated shores are characterised by the Granulolabium—Venerupis— Ervilia biofacies, a muddy foreshore by the Granulolabium— Mohrensternia—Ervilia biofacies and a shallow to moderately deep sublittoral by the Hydrobia-Venerupis-Pseudamnicola biofacies. The well-agitated shore includes ooid shoal environments in the Vienna Basin (Nexing, Hauskirchen, Kettlasbrunn, Siebenhirten 3) and has high freshwater influx at Soceni, Romania. The muddy foreshore environment is phytalassociated, as indicated by the abundance of Mohrensternia within the samples of Zhabiak and Siebenhirten 4, and represents an intertidal mudflat channel at Siebenhirten 1 and 2. Not all biozones and regions of the Sarmatian Sea are covered within this study. Nevertheless, we suggest that these biofacies cover a wide and representative range of possible assemblage compositions of Sarmatian nearshore and shallowwater assemblages.

Fig. 8.

Log of Zhabiak, western Ukraine (Volhyno-Podolian Plate).

f08_767.jpg

Fig. 9.

Log of Jurkino, Peninsula Crimea, Ukraine (Indol-Kuban Basin).

f09_767.jpg

Fig. 10.

Log of Zavjetnoje, Crimean Peninsula, Ukraine (Indol-Kuban Basin).

f10_767.jpg

Fig. 11.

Average percentage abundance of species with 95% confidence intervals on a logarithmic scale at the localities Siebenhirten (A), Kettlasbrunn (B), Nexing (C), and Hauskirchen (D).

f11_767.jpg

Species of the Granulolabium—Venerupis—Ervilia biofacies are mostly restricted to the Volhynian samples from the Vienna Basin (Kettlasbrunn, Nexing, Siebenhirten) and from Soceni (Romania) (Cluster V1, Fig. 13). Although the faunal compositions of these localities differ strongly from each other (Tables 3,4), they share some environmental conditions. All samples from the wavy oolitic sand layers of Hauskirchen are characterised by a high abundance of Ervilia dissita, and they are also rich in Cerithium rubiginosum and Hydrobia spp., pointing to shallow-water conditions. Kettlasbrunn, Nexing, and sample Siebenhirten 3 are dominated by the bivalves Ervilia dissita and Venerupis tricuspis. The cross-bedded flood tidal deposits of Nexing consist of transported shells; the numerous hydrobiid and batillariid gastropods seem to originate from intertidal environments, whilst the venerid, mesodesmatid, donacid, and cardiid bivalves are most probably taxa from the foreshore and shoreface (Harzhauser and Piller 2010). Sample Siebenhirten 3 bears high numbers of the infaunal bivalves Abra reflexa and Ervilia dissita, indicating a tidal flat environment between the underlying fluvial gravel and the overlying transgressive marine clay. Harzhauser and Piller (2004b, 2007) described the deposits of the Upper Ervilia Zone as carbonate, represented by oolites and coquina-dominated sands, which started to spread in nearshore settings and on shallow shoals. The oolite facies was also detected at Hauskirchen and Kettlasbrunn. Kowalke and Harzhauser (2004) suggest that the Mohrensternia communities became replaced by Cerithium-dommated assemblages at that time. This fits well to the samples from Hauskirchen, which are characterised by the high abundance of the gastropod Cerithium rubiginosum. Thus, sedimentology and the mollusc assemblages indicate a shallow coastal habitat in carbonate-oversaturated marine water of a well-agitated ooid shoal. The samples from the tempestitic shell beds at Soceni are characterised by intertidal species (Granulolabium bicinctum) and taxa which tolerate freshwater (Hydrobia, Melanopsis, Mytilaster). Several species/genera, which cluster at branch C of the R-mode cluster analysis (Fig. 13), tolerate freshwater influx. The tempestites indicate a well-agitated shore, and the high abundance of gastropods which tolerate freshwater, such as Melanopsis impressa, Theodoxus, and Hydrobia, suggest considerable freshwater influx. This fits well with Jekelius description (1944). He defined the deposits of Soceni Politioanã as a typical intertidal shore, except for the topmost layer, which bears mainly freshwater elements.

Fig. 12.

Average percentage abundance of species with 95% confidence intervals on a logarithmic scale at the localities Soceni (A), Zhabiak (B), Zavjetnoje (C), and Jurkino (D).

f12_767.jpg

Fig. 13.

Q- and R-mode cluster analysis using the Bray-Curtis similarity index. Size of dots indicates relative abundance in samples. Resulting biofacies in combination with Q-mode and R-mode clusters are used to interpret three palaeoenvironments.

f13_767.jpg

Species of the Granulolabium—Mohrensternia—Ervilia biofacies are most abundant within all samples from Zhabiak (western Ukraine) and the samples Siebenhirten 1, 2, and 4 (Vienna Basin), which build a cluster within the Q-mode analysis (V2). Thus, we interpret the environment of Zhabiak and Siebenhirten 1, 2, and 4 (Q-mode cluster V2) as a phytal-associated muddy foreshore. The tempestitic shell beds of Zhabiak show highest abundances of the gastropod Mohrensternia inflata and the bivalve Ervilia dissita. Both species make up 80% of the total mollusc assemblage. In sample Siebenhirten 4, the rissooids Mohrensternia inflata and M. styriaca take over, accompanied by Abra reflexa. Mohrensternia is generally most common in calm pelitic facies (Kowalke and Harzhauser 2004). Typically, the accompanying fauna of Mohrensternia changes from gastropods such as Granulolabium bicinctum towards a bivalve-dominated fauna with high numbers of Abra reflexa and rare Ervilia dissita (Harzhauser and Kowalke 2004). The gastropod genus Mohrensternia, restricted to the lowermost Sarmatian, seems to have preferred aberrant salinity conditions: this genus flourished in hypersaline coastal environments and was rare during all normal marine stages in both the Central and Eastern Paratethys (Kowalke and Harzhauser 2004). Samples Siebenhirten 1 and 2 are taken from a sandy channel structure. They are dominated by the gastropod Granulolabium bicinctum, which is an indicator for mudflat environments (Harzhauser and Kowalke 2002). Harzhauser and Piller (2004a) correlated this fauna to nearshore conditions based on observations of modern relatives, which are frequently found in littoral settings such as mudflats (Harzhauser and Piller 2004a). As the rissoid gastropods (e.g., Mohrensternia) are micro-algal grazers, a phytal cover can be postulated as well (Bandel and Kowalke 1999; Kowalke and Harzhauser 2004).

Table 4.

Anosim of localities. R-values (A), p-values (B).

t04_767.gif

Species of the Hydrobia—Venerupis—Pseudamnicola biofacies are abundant within Bessarabian samples from Jurkino and Zavjetnoje (Q-mode cluster A) from the sandy, shallow to moderately-deep sublittoral. While some of the species in this cluster are restricted to Bessarabian age (Blinia pseudolaevigata, Pseudamnicola cyclostomoides, Akburunella nefanda, A. verneuilii, Acteocina usturtensis, A. inflexa, and Retusa gerassimovi) some also occur in Volhynian deposits (Gibbula urupensis, Trochus angulatosarmates, Tr. sarmates, Akburunella akburunensis, Mactra andrussowi, and Cryptomactra pesanseris) (Kolesnikov 1935; Harzhauser and Kowalke 2004). A warm and carbonate-dominated system persisted into the subsequent Bessarabian stage in the Eastern Paratethys. Microbialitic bryozoan-polychaete bioherms flourished in the coastal waters. This semi-closed sea was interpreted as warm, shallow, well-aerated and eutrophic (Goncharova and Rostovtseva 2009). Typical molluscs associated with the carbonate bodies are Venerupis tricuspis and various species of Akburunella, Gibbula, Acteocina, and Pseudamnicola. The nassariid genus Akburunella occurs in the Lower Sarmatian of the entire Paratethys but attained an exceptional diversity during the Bessarabian of the Eastern Paratethys (Harzhauser and Kowalke 2004). At Jurkino and Zavjetnoje, with 5 to 8 different species of Akburunella, A. akburunensis is the most dominant species. Coastal assemblages, as documented from Zavjetnoje, are dominated by hydrobiids (Hydrobia and Pseudamnicola). Sample Zavjetnoje 10, which is somewhat isolated in the Q-mode cluster analysis, is strongly dominated by bivalves (Venerupis tricuspis, Musculus sarmaticus, Mactra andrussowi). The stratigraphically valuable Cryptomactra, however, is of subordinate importance in the studied samples.

Conclusions

Molluscan abundances of eight Sarmatian localities from the Central and Eastern Paratethys were compared, showing the potential of quantitative comparisons of mollusc faunas in almost isolated systems yielding endemic faunas. Stratigraphic and regional signals are present in these assemblages and are sometimes difficult to disentangle. Samples from Jurkino and Zavjetnoje are of Bessarabian age and come from the Crimean region and are therefore temporally and spatially strongly separated from all other samples. Among the Volhynian localities, samples cluster roughly according to biozones (Mohrensternia Zone versus Upper Ervilia Zone), but also reflect the different depositional environments of the studied localities. Biofacies show strong palaeoenvironmental affiliations and cover a wide range of possible compositions of Sarmatian nearshore and shallow-water assemblages. The Granulolabium—Venerupis—Ervilia biofacies characterises ooid shoals in the Vienna Basin and a well-agitated shore with high freshwater influx in Romania. The Granulolabium—Mohrensternia— Ervilia biofacies represents intertidal mudflats in the Vienna Basin and a muddy foreshore with phytal cover in the western Ukraine. The Hydrobia—Venerupis—Pseudamnicola biofacies indicates shallow to moderately deep sublittoral settings in Crimea (Ukraine).

Table 5.

Anosim of regions. R-values (A), p-values (B).

t05_767.gif

Table 6.

Anosim of stratigraphic intervals. R?values (A), p?values (B).

t06_767.gif

Acknowledgements

We thank Barbara Studencka (Muzeum Ziemi PAN, Warsaw, Poland), Marek Jasionowski (Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny, Warsaw, Poland), Olga and Vitaliy Anistratenko (Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology of National Academy of Siences of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine), Werner Piller (University Graz, Austria), Andreas Kroh and Franz Topka (Natural History Museum Vienna, Vienna, Austria) for help with fieldwork. Andreas Kroh provided important field notes and photographs from the outcrops of Soceni and Zhabiak. Fred Rögl (Natural History Museum Vienna, Vienna, Austria) determined some foraminifera and Johann Hohenegger (University of Vienna, Austria) commented on the statistical analyses. Michael Stachowitsch (University of Vienna, Austria) improved a late version of the manuscript, which also benefited from critical readings of Alexander Lukeneder (Natural History Museum Vienna, Vienna, Austria). Comments and suggestions by Adam Tomašových (University of Chicago, Illinois, USA), Tom Olszewski (Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, USA) and an anonymous reviewer significantly improved the manuscript. This study was financially supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): P 19013-B17 and by project H-2240/2007 of the Hochschuljubiläumsstiftung der Stadt Wien.

References

1.

MJ. Anderson 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26: 32–6. Google Scholar

2.

N.J. Andrussow 1911. Die fossilen Bryozoenriffe der Halbinsel Kertsch und Toman 1. 144 pp. Self-published, Kiev. Google Scholar

3.

K. Bandel and T. Kowalke 1999. Gastropod fauna of the Cameroonian coast. Helgoland Marine Research 53: 129–140. Google Scholar

4.

P. Bouchet and J.P. Rocroi 2005. Classification and Nomenclatur of gastropod families. Malacologia 47: 1–397. Google Scholar

5.

J.R. Bray and J.T. Curtis 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27: 325–349. Google Scholar

6.

E. Bretenská 1974. Die Foraminiferen des Sarmatien s. str. In : A. Papp , Marinescu F. , and J. Seneš (eds.), Chronostratigraphie und Neostratotypen 4: M5 Sarmatien , 243–293. VEDA-Verlag der Slowakischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bratislava. Google Scholar

7.

J.H. Brown and A.G Gibson 1983. Biogeography. 654 pp. The C. V. Mosby Company, St. Louis. Google Scholar

8.

I. Casanovas-Vilar and J. Agusti 2007. Ecogeographical stability and climate forcing in the Late Miocene (Vallesian) rodent record of Spain. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 248: 169–189. Google Scholar

9.

T.J. Case , DT. Bolger , and A.D. Richman 1992. Reptilian extinctions: The last ten thousand years. In : PL. Fielder and S.K. Jain (eds.), Conservation Biology , 91–125. Chapman and Hall, New York. Google Scholar

10.

T.J. Case and ML. Cody 1987. Testing theories of island biogeography. American Scientist 75: 402–11. Google Scholar

11.

K.R. Clarke and R.N. Gorley 2001. Primer v5. User Manual/Tutorial. 91 pp. Primer—E, Plymouth. Google Scholar

12.

K.R. Clarke and R.M. Warwick 1994. Changes in Marine Communities. An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. 144 pp. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth. Google Scholar

13.

CB. Cox and P.D. Moore 1993. Biogeography: an Ecological and Evolutionary Approach, Ed. 5.x + 326 pp. Blackwell Sciences Publications, Oxford. Google Scholar

14.

J.M. Diamond 1972. Biogeographic kinetics: estimation of relaxation times for avifaunas of southwest Pacific Islands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 69: 3199–3203. Google Scholar

15.

W. Friedberg 1911–1928. Mollusca miocenica Poloniae, pars I (Gastropoda et Scaphopoda). 1911: 1–112; 1912: 113–240; 1914: 241–360; 1923: 361–40; 1928:441–561. Musaeum Dzieduszyckianum, Lwów-Poznań. Google Scholar

16.

L.S. Galets'kyi 2007. An Atlas of the Geology and Mineral Deposits of Ukraine. 168 pp. Nacional'na Akademija Nauk Ukrainy, Kiev. Google Scholar

17.

D.H. Geary 1990. Patterns of evolutionary tempo and mode in the radiation of Melanopsis (Gastropoda; Melanopsidae). Paleobiology 16: 492–511. Google Scholar

18.

I.A. Goncharova and Y.V. Rostovtseva 2009. Evolution of the Organogenic Carbonate Buildups in the Middle through Late Miocene of the Eucine-Caspian Basin (Eastern Paratethys). Paleontological Journal 43: 866–876. Google Scholar

19.

O. Hammer , D.A.T. Harper , and PD. Ryan 2001. PAST. Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4 (1/4). ( http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_l/past/issuel_01.htmGoogle Scholar

20.

M. Harzhauser and T. Kowalke 2002. Sarmatian (Late Middle Miocene) gastropod assemblages of the Central Paratethys. Facies 46: 57–82. Google Scholar

21.

M. Harzhauser and T. Kowalke 2004. Survey of the nassariid gastropods in the Neogene Paratethys. Archiv für Molluskenkunde 133: 1–61. Google Scholar

22.

M. Harzhauser and W.E. Piller 2004a. The Early Sarmatian—hidden seesaw changes. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 246: 89–112. Google Scholar

23.

M. Harzhauser and W.E. Piller 2004b. Intergrated stratigraphy of the Sarmatian (Upper Middle Miocene) in the western Central Paratethys. Stratigraphy 1: 65–86. Google Scholar

24.

M. Harzhauser and W.E. Piller 2007. Benchmark data of a changing sea—palaeogeography, palaeobiogeography and events in the Central Paratethys during the Miocene. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 253: 8–31. Google Scholar

25.

M. Harzhauser and W.E. Piller 2010. Molluscs as major part of subtropical shallow water carbonate production—an example from a Middle Miocene oolite shoal (Upper Serravallian, Austria). International Association of Sedimentologists, Special Publications 42 (for 2009): 185–200. Google Scholar

26.

D.M. Hills , C. Moritz , and B.K. Mable 1996. Molecular systematics. Second edition. 655 pp. Sinaur Associates, Sunderland. Google Scholar

27.

A. Jámbor 1978. New ideas about the changing salinity of the Neogene seas pre-existing in the present-day Hungarian Territory [in Hungarian with English abstract]. A Magyar Álami Állami Földtani Intézet Évi Jelentése Budapest 1976:260–265. Google Scholar

28.

E. Jekelius 1944. Sarmat und Pont von Soceni (Banat). Mémoriile Institutului Geologic al României 5: 1–167. Google Scholar

29.

E. Kojumdgieva 1969. Sarmatien. Les fossiles de Bulgarie 8: 1–223. Google Scholar

30.

E. Kojumdgieva 1987. Systematique et phylogénie des Cardiidés sarmatiens de la Paratethys. Geologica Balcanica 17: 3–14. Google Scholar

31.

V. Kolesnikov 1935. Sarmatische Mollusken [in Russian with German description]. Paläontologie der USSR 10 (2): 1–416. Google Scholar

32.

T. Kowalke and M. Harzhauser 2004. Early ontogeny and palaeoecology of the Mid-Miocene rissoid gastropods of the Central Paratethys. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 49: 111–134. Google Scholar

33.

A. Linder and W. Berchtold 1976. Statistische Auswertung von Prozentzahlen. 232 pp. Birkhäuser, Basel. Google Scholar

34.

O. Mandic , M. Harzhauser , R. Roetzel , and P. Tibuleac 2008. Benthic mass-mortality events on a Middle Miocene incised-valley tidal-flat (North Alpine Foredeep Basin). Facies 55: 343–359. Google Scholar

35.

A.A. Myers and P.S. Giller 1988. Analytical Biogeography: An Integrated Approach to the Study of Animal and Plant Distributions. 578 pp. Chapman and Hall, London. Google Scholar

36.

E. Michel 1994. Why snails radiate: A review of gastropod evolution in long-lived lakes, both recent and fossil. Archiv für Hydrobiologie-Beiheft Ergebnisse der Lomonlogie 44: 285–317. Google Scholar

37.

L.A. Nevesskaja [L.A. Nevesskaâ ], I.A. Goncharova [ I.A. Gončarova ], N.P. Paramonova , S.B. Popov , E.B. Babak , K.G. Bagdasarjan [K.G. Bagdasarân ], and A.A. Voronina 1993. Opredelitelej miocenovyh dvustvorčatih mollüskov Ûgo-Zapadnoj Evrazii. 412 pp. Nauka, Moskva. Google Scholar

38.

A. Papp 1954. Die Molluskenfauna im Sarmat des Wiener Beckens. Mitteilungen der Geologischen Gesellschaft in Wien 45 (for 1952): 1–119. Google Scholar

39.

A. Papp 1956. Fazies und Gliederung des Sarmats im Wiener Becken. Mitteilungen der Geologischen Gesellschaft in Wien 47 (for 1954): 35–98. Google Scholar

40.

A. Papp 1974a. Äquivalente des Sarmatien s.str. ausserhalb der Paratethys. In : A. Papp , F. Marinescu , and J. Seneš (eds.), M5 Sarmatien. Chronostratigraphie und Neostratotypen 4 , 63–68. VEDA-Verlag der Slowakischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bratislava. Google Scholar

41.

A. Papp 1974b. Die Molluskenfauna der Sarmatischen Schichtengruppe. In : A. Papp , F. Marinescu , and J. Seneš (eds.), M5 Sarmatien. Chronostratigraphie und Neostratotypen 4 , 318–27. VEDA-Verlag der Slowakischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bratislava. Google Scholar

42.

A. Papp and J. Senes 1974. Grundzüge der Entwicklung der Fauna und die Biozonen im Sarmatium s. str. der Zentralen Paratethys. In : A. Papp , F. Marinescu , and J. Seneš (eds.), M5 Sarmatien. Chronostratigraphie und Neostratotypen 4 , 41–44. VEDA-Verlag der Slowakischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bratislava. Google Scholar

43.

W.E. Piller and M. Harzhauser 2005. The myth of the brackish Sarmatian Sea. Terra Nova 17: 450–455. Google Scholar

44.

A. Pisera 1996. Miocene Reefs of the Paratethys: A review. SEPM Concepts in Sedimentology and Paleontology 5: 97–104. Google Scholar

45.

S.V. Popov , F. Rögl , A.Y. Rozanov , F.F. Steininger , I.G. Scherba , and M. Kovac 2004. Lithological-paleogeographic maps of the Paratethys (10 maps Late Eocene to Pliocene). Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 250: 1–46. Google Scholar

46.

F. Rögl 1998. Palaeogeographic Considerations for Mediterranean and Paratethys Seaways (Oligocene to Miocene). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien 99A: 279–310. Google Scholar

47.

F. Rögl 1999. Mediterranean and Paratethys. Facts and hypotheses of an Oligocène to Miocene paleogeography (short overview). Geologica Carpathica 50: 339–349. Google Scholar

48.

F. Rögl and F.F. Steininger 1984. Neogene Paratethys, Mediterranean and Indo-Pacific seaways. Implications for the paleobiogeography of marine and terrestrial biotas. In : Brenchley P. (ed.), Fossils and Climate , 171–200. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester. Google Scholar

49.

L.C. Sallan and M.I. Coates 2010. End-Devonian extinction and a bottleneck in the early evolution of modern jawed vertebrates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 (22): 10131–10135. Google Scholar

50.

J. Seneš 1974. Paläogeographie der Zentralen Paratethys im Sarmatien s. str. In : A. Papp , F. Marinescu , and J. Senes (eds.), M5 Sarmatien. Chronostratigraphie und Neostratotypen 4 , 140–144. VEDA-Verlag der Slowakischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bratislava. Google Scholar

51.

I. Simionescu and I.Z. Barbu 1940. La faunae Sarmatienne de Roumanie. Memoriile Institutului Geologic al României 3: 1–194. Google Scholar

52.

W.B. Simison 2006. Patterns of endemism for nearshore gastropod molluscs: A new view of the Gulf of California. Journal of Molluscan Studies 72: 53–63. Google Scholar

53.

F.F. Steininger and G. Wessely 2000. From the Tethyan Ocean to the Paratethys Sea: Oligocene to Neogene stratigraphy, paleogeography and paleobiogeography of the circum-Mediterranean region and the Oligocene to Neogene Basin evolution in Austria. Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geologischen Gesellschaft 92: 95–116. Google Scholar

54.

J. Švagrovsky 1971. Das Sarmat der Tschechoslowakei und seine Molluskenfauna. Acta Geologica et Geographica Universitatis Comenianae, Geologica 20: 1–473. Google Scholar

55.

K. Turnovsky 1963. Zonengliederung mit Foraminiferenfaunen und Ökologie im Neogen des Wiener Beckens. Mitteilungen der Geologischen Gesellschaft in Wien 56: 211–224. Google Scholar

56.

F.P. Wesselingh , H. Alcicek , and I. Magyar 2008. A Late Miocene Paratethyan mollusc fauna from the Denizli Basin (southwestern Anatolia, Turkey) and its regional palaeobiogeographic implications. Geobios 41: 861–879. Google Scholar

57.

B.A. Wilcox 1978. Supersaturated island faunas: A species-area relationship for lizards on post-Pleistocene land-bridge islands. Science 199: 996–998. Google Scholar

58.

M. Zuschin , M. Harzhauser , and O. Mandic 2007. The stratigraphic and sedimentologic framework of fine-scale faunal replacements in the Middle Miocene of the Vienna Basin (Austria). Palaios 22: 285–295. Google Scholar
Susanne Lukeneder, Martin Zuschin, Mathias Harzhauser, and Oleg Mandic "Spatiotemporal Signals and Palaeoenvironments of Endemic Molluscan Assemblages in the Marine System of the Sarmatian Paratethys," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 56(4), 767-784, (1 December 2011). https://doi.org/10.4202/app.2010.0046
Received: 11 May 2010; Accepted: 11 February 2011; Published: 1 December 2011
JOURNAL ARTICLE
18 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top