Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2014 Osteohistology of the Early Triassic Ichthyopterygian Reptile Utatsusaurus hataii: Implications for Early Ichthyosaur Biology
Yasuhisa Nakajima, Alexandra Houssaye, Hideki Endo
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Ichthyosaurs were highly adapted to a marine lifestyle, as shown by their fish-like body shape and their assumed active swimming abilities and high metabolic rates. However, the processes of adaptation to an aquatic life in the early stages of this lineage remain poorly understood. Here, we present the first osteohistological data concerning the most basal ichthyopterygian yet known, Utatsusaurus hataii, from the Lower Triassic of Japan. The cancellous bone structure suggests adaptation to active swimming in an open marine environment. Moreover, the possible occurrence of rapidly deposited bone tissue, in a fibrolamellar complex, suggests a higher metabolic rate than in modern poikilothermic reptiles, and therefore a trend toward homeothermy. This basal ichthyosaur, with its elongate body, was already more adapted to an aquatic lifestyle than expected from its morphology, and the process of adaptation to a marine lifestyle was already well advanced by the Early Triassic.

Introduction

The Ichthyopterygia (sensu Motani 1999, corresponding to the traditional Ichthyosauria sensu Sander 2000 and Maisch 2010) represents one of the most successful groups of Mesozoic marine reptiles and is known from the late Early Triassic to early Late Cretaceous (Motani 2005; Fig. 1A). Most of the derived forms, called “neoichthyosaurians”, display a reduced pelvic girdle and a tuna-shaped body plan, with a spindle-shaped trunk, flippers, a dorsal fin, and a semilunate tail, suggesting a thunniform mode of swimming (Lingham-Soliar and Reif 1998; Fig. 1B). However, the earliest forms have a long, slender body with a rather straight (or weakly bent; see Motani 1999) long tail. They still retain a robust articulation of the pelvic girdle with the axial skeleton, and were probably anguilliform swimmers (Motani et al. 1996; Fig. 1C). Some Middle to Late Triassic forms, such as Mixosaurus, display an intermediate state between the basal ichthyopterygians and the neoichthyosaurians (Fig. 1D), and all these forms are considered to have been well adapted for a fully marine life.

Generally, the inner bone structure of secondarily aquatic amniotes displays either a compact or a cancellous structure, depending on the specific swimming style and habitat of the taxon (Ricqlès and Buffrénil 2001). One pattern corresponds to osteosclerosis; it is not morphologically observable, and might be associated with hyperplasy of the bone cortex, called pachyostosis, which results in a morphologically observable thickening of the bone (Houssaye 2009). It occurs in essentially or exclusively aquatic animals living in shallow waters (Houssaye 2009). The other pattern is osteoporotic. Interpreted as an especially advanced aquatic adaptation for improved locomotory performance (diving and accelerating capacities and/or manoeuvrability), it is characteristically found in highly aquatic tetrapods with good swimming abilities (Ricqlès and Buffrénil 2001; Houssaye 2009), such as extant cetaceans (Felts and Spurrel 1966; Buffrénil and Schoevaert 1988), the leatherback turtle (Rhodin 1985), some mosasaurs (Sheldon 1997), some plesiosaurs (Wiffen et al. 1995), and ichthyosaurs (Kiprijanov 1881; Seitz 1907; Gross 1934).

Fig. 1.

Simplified view of the evolution of the Ichthyopterygia. A. Time-calibrated phylogenetic tree of the Ichthyopterygia. B–D. Schematic drawings (from McGowan and Motani 2003) showing the evolution of the body plan within the Ichthyopterygia (not to scale), between the basal ichthyopterygian Utatsusaurus (B), the basal ichthyosaurian Mixosaurus (C), and the scombrid fish-shaped neoichthyosaurian Ophthalmosaurus (D). Stratigraphic data compiled after McGowan and Motani (2003), Fernández (2003), Bennett et al. (2012), and Wiman (1910).

f01_343.jpg

Limb bones, vertebrae, and/or ribs of the Triassic marine reptiles Mixosaurus (Reptilia; Ichthyosauria; Fig. 1C; Kolb et al. 2011) and Omphalosaurus (whose ichthyopterygian status is not fully established; Sander and Faber 1998, 2003 vs. Motani 2000), and a possible ichthyopterygian Pessopteryx (Houssaye et al., 2014), as well as those of the neoichthyosaurians Ichthyosaurus, Stenopterygius (Buffrénil and Mazin 1990; Houssaye et al. 2014), Temnodontosaurus (Kolb et al. 2011; Houssaye et al. 2014), Molle saurus (Talevi and Fernández 2012), Caypullisaurus (Talevi et al. 2012), Ophthalmosaurus (Houssaye et al. 2014), and Platypterygius (Lopuchowycz and Massare 2002; Kiprijanov 1881), have been examined histologically. Limb bones and gastralia of Mixosaurus sp. and ribs of Mollesaurus show relatively high inner compactness (Kolb et al. 2011; Talevi and Fernández 2012), whereas all the other taxa display a cancellous inner skeletal organization (Buffrénil et al. 1987; Buffrénil and Mazin 1990; Kolb et al. 2011; Talevi et al. 2012; Houssaye et al. 2014).

Bone tissue types are defined by the orientation of the collagen fibres and the type of vascularization (e.g., type of canals, orientation, and density). This reflects various rates of bone deposition (Amprino 1947; Margerie et al. 2002; Montes et al. 2010) and has frequently been used to estimate the growth rates of extinct taxa (Padian et al. 2001, 2004). Bone depositional rate estimated by osteohistology indicates the basal metabolic rate of the animal (Padian et al. 2001). Indeed, Poikilothermic reptiles generally have parallel-fibred bone with simple vascular canals, which is deposited slowly (e.g., Castanet et al. 1988). A characteristic feature of ichthyosaurian osteohistology is a quickly deposited bone tissue called the “fibrolamellar complex” (Buffrénil and Mazin 1990; Kolb et al. 2011; Houssaye et al. 2014), which corresponds to an association of a woven bone matrix and primary osteons (Francillon-Vieillot et al. 1990). The fibrolamellar complex is shared by modern rapidly growing mammals and birds, as well as by extinct synapsids, dinosaurs, and pterosaurs (e.g., Enlow and Brown 1956, 1957, 1958; Ricqlès 1976; Ray et al. 2004; Padian et al. 2001; Chinsamy et al. 2009). This suggests rapid growth and a relatively high metabolic rate (even possibly homeothermy) in the Ichthyosauria (Scheyer et al. 2010). A high metabolic rate and active swimming in the ichthyosaurians are also supported by previous biomechanical (e.g., Motani 2002) and isotopic (Bernard et al. 2010) studies.

On the other hand, the early history of ichthyosaurian biology remains poorly understood, partly because of insufficient information about the basal ichthyopterygians. Against this background, this study focuses on Utatsusaurus hataii Shikama, Kamei, and Murata, 1978, the most basal ichthyopterygian yet known. This animal is 2–3 m long, with a relatively slender body and an eel-like caudal fin. This transitional form retains both cranial and postcranial features of terrestrial amniotes to some degree (e.g., sacral ribs, equal length of the humerus and femur; Motani et al. 1998; Fig. 1C). This study presents for the first time histological data for this taxon and draws inferences about its growth, physiology, and ecology.

Institutional abbreviations.—IGPS, Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan; NSM, National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo, Japan; UHR, Hokkaido University Museum, Sapporo, Japan.

Other abbreviations.—HL, length of the humerus.

Material and methods

Utatsusaurus hataii was originally described based on 13 specimens from the Motoyoshi District, Miyagi Prefecture, Japan (Shikama et al. 1978), although only two incomplete specimens of the original referred specimens—the holotype (IGPS 95941) and a paratype (IGPS 95942)—are firmly recognized as Utatsusaurus (Motani 1997). Subsequently, two additional specimens from Ogatsu, Ishinomaki City, Miyagi Prefecture (NSM-VP-20028, UHR30691; Motani et al. 1998) and one from the Motoyoshi District (NSM-VP-21865; YN personal observations) have been collected.

Fig. 2.

Analysed skeletal elements of the ichthyopterygian Utatsusaurus hataii Shikama, Kamei, and Murata, 1978 (Osawa Formation, Spathian; Miyagi Prefecture, Japan). A, D. NSM-VP-21865, dorsal ribs. B, C. NSM-VP-20028, dorsal ribs. E-G. NSM-VP-21865, humerus (E), radius (F), and phalanx (G).The humerus shows a D-shaped outline, consisting of the anterior flange (af) and the shaft region (sr). Grey quadrangles and white lines show the sectional planes. Scale bars 10 mm.

f02_343.jpg

In this study, samples were taken from two individuals of Utatsusaurus (NSM-VP-20028 and NSM-VP-21865). These specimens were discovered in the upper part of the Osawa Formation and are considered Late Olenekian (Spathian) in age (Kashiyama and Oji 2004). The length of the humerus (HL) of NSM-VP-21865 (52 mm) is approximately 90% that of the largest well-preserved humerus (IGPS 95942: 57 mm). The HL of NSM-VP-20028 is 61 mm, although this specimen does not seem to be as large as this value indicates, because it has experienced tectonic shearing deformation (Motani et al. 1998). Overall, it seems to be approximately the same size as IGPS95942. Therefore, these specimens are considered to be similar in size to the largest specimen.

We chose the mid-shaft as the preferred sampling location for the limb bones and ribs to ensure comparability with existing data; the mid-shaft has frequently been used for histological sampling in previous studies of the internal bone structure of aquatic tetrapods (e.g., Buffrénil et al. 2010; Canoville and Laurin 2010). Whenever possible, additional sections were taken from different positions to examine histological and microanatomical variations within the bone. Mid-shaft sections from two dorsal ribs (one from each individual), proximal sections from two dorsal ribs of NSM-VP-21865, and distal sections from two dorsal ribs (one from each individual) were taken (Fig. 2A–D). Mid-shaft sections from limb bones, including the humerus (Fig. 2E), radius (Fig. 2F), and phalange (Fig. 2G), were also taken. The humeral mid-shaft section crosses the well-marked tuberosity (Motani 1997), which shows apparent local periosteal hyperplasy within the shaft region. The histological sections were processed using standard procedures (see Kolb et al. 2011). Thin sections were analysed with Leica DMLP and Nikon Eclipse E600 microscopes under natural and polarized (with and without lambda compensator) lights. Photomicrographs were taken using Nikon Coolpix 5000 and Zeiss AxioCam MRc5. Although some histological features, notably the crystal orientation, were not always preserved, the observation and sampling of several bone elements with varying degrees of preservation allowed the description of bone histology.

Results

Rib.—In the rib proximal and mid-shaft sections, the cortical compactness varies between and within sections. It seems that there is no open medullary cavity or only a small one, but rather an extremely cancellous medullary region, with large cavities separated by only a few relatively thin trabeculae (Fig. 3A–C). The cortex appears to be highly vascularized with simple vascular canals (Fig. 4A, C) and it becomes progressively more cancellous from the periphery of the bone to its core, which already shows abundant erosional bays (Fig. 4A, C). The inner part of the cortex contains dense, irregularly organized globular cell lacunae (Fig. 4D) that are generally typical of fibrous bone (Francillon-Vieillot et al. 1990). Cross-polarized views of rib sections show nearly total monorefringence, which does not seem to reflect the original osteohistological state but to be a diagenetic artefact (Fig. 4A, B). A progressive decrease in density of cells and a morphological change from globular to spindle-shaped cells (Fig. 4D), typical of parallel-fibred or lamellar bone, is observed toward the periphery, which suggests that the peripheral cortex consists of parallel-fibred bone, despite its monorefringence under polarized light.

Rib distal sections suggest a relatively tubular structure, with a thin cortex and a relatively large inner medullary cavity (Fig. 3E, F) surrounded by endosteal bone (Fig. 4F). There is a change from the inner part of the cortex to the periphery, but contrary to the other sections, the change in the distal section is rather abrupt (Fig. 4F). The bone tissue and its preservational condition in each part of the cortex are similar to the proximal and mid-diaphyseal sections.

The microstructure of the rib sections is thus generally separable into three zones: (i) The perimedullary region with the osseous trabeculae or with a circumferential deposit, probably around an open medullary cavity; (ii) the internal cortex, whose cells evoke woven-fibred bone, rich in simple vascular canals and erosional bays; and (iii) the nearly avascular outer cortex, with spindle-shaped osetocyte lacunae evoking a parallel-fibred-like microstructure.

Fig. 3.

Transverse sections of dorsal ribs of the ichthyopterygian Utatsusaurus hataii Shikama, Kamei, and Murata, 1978 (Osawa Formation, Spathian; Miyagi Prefecture, Japan). A, B. NSM-VP-21865, proximal sections; A (see Fig. 2A) and B (see Fig. 2D, upper section). C. NSM-VP-20028, mid-shaft section (see Fig. 2B). D. NSM-VP-21865, mid-shaft section (see Fig. 2D, middle section). E. NSM-VP-20028, distal section (see Fig. 2C). F. NSM-VP-21865, distal section (see Fig. 2D, lower section). Photographed under natural light. Scale bars 1 mm.

f03_343.jpg

Appendicular skeleton.—A plate-like thin anterior expansion, called the “anterior flange” (e.g., Motani 1997) develops along the anterior margin of the humerus, making its outline D-shaped in dorsal and ventral views (Fig. 2E). As a consequence, the transverse sections of the humerus are antero-posteriorly elongated (Fig. 5A).

The cortex of the humerus is naturally thicker in the shaft region, especially at the position of the mid-shaft tuberosity, but much thinner in the anterior flange (Fig. 5A). Most of the cortical bone matrix in the shaft region is monorefringent under polarized light (Fig. 6A, B), perhaps reflecting the original random fibre arrangement or a preservational artefact. It contains irregularly shaped osteocyte lacunae, which are irregularly distributed (Fig. 6C), evoking a woven bone matrix. Some parallel-fibred bone can also be observed locally, notably in the anterior flange (see below). The cortex of the shaft region is highly vascularized with longitudinally oriented primary osteons (Fig. 6D). This tissue seems thus to correspond to a standard fibrolamellar complex. The borders of the vascular canals undergo resorption during growth, so that the vascular canals evolve into large inter-trabecular spaces with irregular margins in the inner part of the sections (Fig. 6A, C), giving the bone a spongy inner organization with cancellousness increasing towards the core of the bone. Evidence of secondary bone deposition is not seen in the cortex region. In the shaft region the internal part located between the dorsal and ventral cortices is filled with collapsed thin trabeculae, consisting of endosteal lamellar bone (Fig. 6E).

The internal microstructure of the humeral shaft in transverse section is generally divided into three zones: (i) the trabecular bone in the inner part of the section, consisting of secondary lamellar bone; (ii) the inner cortex with, as a result of resorption, enlarged longitudinally oriented vascular canals; and (iii) the outer cortex, barely resorbed, with longitudinally oriented primary osteons.

Fig. 4.

Details of dorsal rib microstructure of the ichthyopterygian Utatsusaurus hataii Shikama, Kamei, and Murata, 1978 (Osawa Formation, Spathian; Miyagi Prefecture, Japan). A, B. NSM-VP-21865, proximal section (see Fig. 2A). C. NSM-VP-20028, mid-diaphyseal section (see Fig. 2B). D, E. NSM-VP-21865, close-up views of cell lacunae in the inner (D) and outer (E) cortices of proximal dorsal rib (see Fig. 2D). F. NSM-VP-20028, distal section (Fig. 2C). Photographed under natural light (A, C–F) and polarized light without lambda compensator (B).

f04_343.jpg

Fig. 5.

Mid-diaphyseal sections of limb bones of the ichthyopterygian Utatsusaurus hataii Shikama, Kamei, and Murata, 1978, NSM-VP-21865 (Osawa Formation, Spathian; Miyagi Prefecture, Japan). A. Humerus (see Fig. 2E). B. Radius (see Fig. 2F). C. Phalange (see Fig. 2G). Photographed under natural light. Scale bars 2 mm.

f05_343.jpg

The histological features in the humeral anterior flange are different from those observed in the shaft. A layer of endosteal parallel-fibred bone is deposited internal to the cortex. The inner cortical region of the anterior flange consists of woven-fibred bone and the periphery consists of parallel-fibred bone (Fig. 6F, G).

The mid-diaphyseal sections of the radius and the phalanx have an inner organization that is cancellous (Fig. 5B, C). In these bones, the preservational condition is the same as in the rib and humeral shaft region (Fig. 7A, B). However, a change can clearly be seen from globular-shaped, dense, randomly arranged cell lacunae, rich in canaliculi (which is typical of woven-fibred bone), in the inner part of the cortex to sparse, smaller, spindle-shaped cell lacunae, poor in canaliculi, at its periphery (Fig 7C–F). This change is accompanied by a significant change in the degree and type of vascularization in the radius, as shown by the abundant primary osteons in the inner part of cortex (Fig. 7A) and by the nearly avascular thin peripheral cortical layer with a few simple vascular canals (Fig. 7D). The cortex in the peripheral part the phalangeal section is barely vascularised (Fig. 7E).

Discussion

Implications for growth pattern and metabolic rate.— The bone histology of the examined bones in Utatsusaurus can be considered rather uniform. Utatsusaurus primary bone shows features of the cell lacunae and vascular canals evoking both fibrolamellar and parallel-fibred bone depending on the bone regions. It seems that fibrolamellar bone deposited in early stages and then parallel-fibred bone deposited at the end. The fibrolamellar complex is known to be deposited quickly, and suggests here a relatively rapid bone growth rate in Utatsusaurus, despite a later decrease in growth speed. However, no significant slowing of growth is observed in the humerus. Growth rate is known to vary between bones within a single specimen (Margerie et al. 2004). The humerus is the thickest and largest element studied, and it was probably growing faster than other examined elements at the time of death.

The fibrolamellar complex has also been observed in the humeri of Mixosaurus (Kolb et al. 2011). Its possible presence in Utatsusaurus suggests that both Mixosaurus and Utatsusaurus, the basal ichthyosaurian and the sister taxon to all other ichthyopterygians, had a relatively high growth rate, interpreted as a precondition for homeothermy. However, a reduction in the bone growth rate throughout ontogeny is observed in Utatsusaurus (except in the humerus), which suggests that this high growth rate did not persist for a long time during ontogeny, as was probably the case for Mixosaurus (Kolb et al. 2011).

The vascularization pattern in the ribs is similar to that described for hydropelvic mosasauroids (Houssaye and Bardet 2012; Houssaye et al. 2013), considered to be gigantothermic (Motani 2010). However, whereas mosasauroids essentially display parallel-fibered bone, Utatsusaurus displays a bone tissue comparable with the fibrolamellar complex, which changes into parallel-fibred bone only later in ontogeny. The rapid deposition of bone indicated by histology suggests a high metabolic rate in Utatsusaurus. Interestingly, this could mean that even a basal ichthyopterygian had a higher metabolic rate than the already large mosasaurs, which were highly adapted for an open-marine life (Houssaye and Bardet 2012).

At this point, it is not possible to infer when this higher metabolic rate was acquired in the process of secondary adaptation to the marine realm in the ichthyopterygian lineage, but this study suggests that it was acquired much earlier than previously thought (Motani 2010).

Cancellous bone and the inferred palaeoecology of Utatsusaurus.—The bones of Utatsusaurus are characterized by imbalanced remodelling, during which active resorption— with the intense development of resorption bays—was only followed by limited deposition of secondary bone (which mainly occurred in the inner part of the bone, so that many thin bone trabeculae at the centre of several mid-shaft sections consist almost entirely of secondary lamellar bone). Consequently, all the bones studied display a cancellous inner organization. However, because of the relatively bad preservation of the bones, it is not possible to state whether the long bones of Utatsusaurus had a narrow open medullary cavity, like those of Omphalosaurus, or no medullary cavity, as in Stenopterygius, Ichthyosaurus, and Mixosaurus (Buffrénil and Mazin 1990; Kolb et al. 2011). Although the thickness of the compact cortex cannot be precisely estimated, it appears rather low, so that most of the bone is spongy. A cancellous inner organization is also observed in the latest Early to Middle Triassic Omphalosaurus (Buffrénil et al. 1987), which might also represent a basal ichthyosaur (Sander and Faber 2003). Until now, this cancellous inner organization has never been observed in Early Triassic aquatic reptiles, except for Omphalosaurus (Buffrénil et al. 1987; Houssaye 2009). Therefore, among marine tetrapods, Utatsusaurus and Omphalosaurus are the earliest known examples of this specialization, which is advantageous for manoeuvrable swimming and cruising in a pelagic marine environment (Ricqlès and Buffrénil 2001). It is also noteworthy that the depositional environment of the Osawa Formation, which bears well associated Utatsusaurus skeletons, is considered to be a prodelta or a continental slope in a transgressive system (Kawakami and Kawamura 2002), which supports the hypothesis of a pelagic lifestyle for this taxon. This unexpected inferred lifestyle of the earliest ichthyosaur in the Early Triassic suggests a rapid ecological radiation of this lineage into the open marine environment after the Permian-Triassic mass extinction event.

Fig. 6.

Details of bone microstructure of a humerus (see Fig. 2E) of the ichthyopterygian Utatsusaurus hataii Shikama, Kamei, and Murata, 1978, NSM-VP-21865 (Osawa Formation, Spathian; Miyagi Prefecture, Japan). A, B. Periosteal cortex of mid-diaphyseal section. C. Close-up view of cell lacunae in the periosteal cortex. D. Close-up view of primary osteons in the primary periosteal bone. E. Mid-diaphyseal section, internal part of the shaft region. F, G. Cortex of the anterior flange. Photographed under natural light (A, C, D, F), polarized light without lambda compensator (B, G), and polarized light with lambda compensator (E).

f06_343.jpg

Fig. 7.

Details of limb bone microstructure of the ichthyopterygian Utatsusaurus hataii Shikama, Kamei, and Murata, 1978, NSM-VP-21865 (Osawa Formation, Spathian; Miyagi Prefecture, Japan). A, B. Mid-diaphyseal section of the radius (see Fig. 2F). C, D. The same section as A, close-up views of inner (C) and outer (D) periosteal bone of the radius. E. Cortex of a phalanx (see Fig. 2G). F. The same section as E, close-up view of cortex. Photographed under natural light (A, C, D, F), polarized light without lambda compensator (B), and polarized light with lambda compensator (E).

f07_343.jpg

Conclusions

The osteohistological analysis of the basal-most ichthyopterygian Utatsusaurus hataii has revealed a cancellous inner bone structure similar to that observed in extant open-seadwelling tetrapods. Histologically, the possible presence of the fibrolamellar complex at least early in development indicates a high metabolic rate and suggests that this taxon already displayed the precondition for homeothermy. Utatsusaurus is therefore interpreted as an active swimmer, inhabiting an open-marine environment. Despite the retention of some terrestrial characters in its morphology (Motani 1997; Motani et al. 1998), this taxon was already advanced in the process of secondary adaptation to the marine realm.

Acknowledgements

YN particularly thanks Kazushige Tanabe (University of Tokyo, Japan) for his supervision. We thank Makoto Manabe (National Science Museum, Tokyo, Japan) for providing the specimens for histological study and for our discussions; and Anusuya Chinsamy-Turan (University of Cape Town, South Africa), Ryosuke Motani (University of California, Davis, USA), Sophie Sanchez (Uppsala University, Norway), P. Martin Sander (University of Bonn, Germany), Torsten M. Scheyer (University of Zurich, Switzerland), and Marianella Talevi (National University of La Plata, Argentina) for their helpful comments that improved the quality of the manuscript, and Michael J. Benton (University of Bristol, UK) for editorial work. We are also grateful to Yoshitsugu Kobayashi (Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan), Ren Hirayama (Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan), Sin'ichi Sato and Jun Nemoto (Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan) for helping YN in observation of the museum collections. Special thanks go to Yukie Abe, Choei Abe, Katsumi Miura, S hoya Oikawa, Tsukasa Takahashi, Yoji Takahashi, and Yasunori Yamauchi (Minami-Sanriku Town, Japan) for their support in the fieldwork of YN. This research was supported by JSPS Research Fellowship for Young Scientists (program no. 22.2077) for YN. AH acknowledges financial support from the A. v. Humboldt Foundation.

References

1.

R. Amprino 1947. La structure du tissu osseux envisagée comme expression de différences dans la vitesse de l'accroissement. Archives de Biologie 58: 315–330. Google Scholar

2.

S.P. Bennett , P.M. Barrett , M.E. Collinson , S. Moore-Fay , P.G. Davis , C. Palmer 2012. A new specimen of Ichthyosaurus communis from Dorset, UK, and its bearing on the stratigraphical range of the species. Proceedings of Geologists' Association 123: 146–154. Google Scholar

3.

A. Bernard , C. Lé;cuyer , P. Vincent , R. Amiot , N. Bardet , E. Buffetaut , G. Cuny , F. Fourel , F. Martineau , J.-M. Mazin , and A. Prieur 2010. Regulation of body temperature by some Mesozoic marine reptiles. Science 328: 1379–1382. Google Scholar

4.

V. de Buffrénil J.-M. Mazin 1990. Bone histology of the ichthyosaurs: comparative data and functional interpretation. Paleobiology 16: 435–447. Google Scholar

5.

V. de Buffrénil and D. Schoevaert 1988. On how the periosteal bone of the delphinid humerus becomes cancellous: Ontogeny of a histological specialization. Journal of Morphology 198: 149–164. Google Scholar

6.

V. de Buffrénil , A. Canoville , R. D'Anastasio , and D.P. Domning 2010. Evolution of sirenian pachyostosis, a model-case for the study of bone structure in aquatic tetrapods. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 17: 101–120. Google Scholar

7.

V. de Buffrénil , J.-M. Mazin , and A. de Ricqlès 1987 Caractéres structuraux et mode de croissance du femur d'Omphalosaurus nisseri, ichthyosaurien du Trias moyen de Spitsberg. Annales de Paléontologie 73: 195–216. Google Scholar

8.

A. Canoville and M. Laurin 2010. Evolution of humeral microanatomy and lifestyle in amniotes, and some comments on palaeobiological inferences. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 100: 384–406. Google Scholar

9.

J. Castanet , D.G. Newman , and H. Saint Girons 1988. Skeletochronological data on the growth, age, and population structure of the tuatara, Sphenodon punctatus, on Stephens and Lady Alice Islands, New Zealand. Herpetologica 44: 25–37. Google Scholar

10.

A. Chinsamy , L. Codorniú , and L. Chiappe 2009. Paleobiological implications of the bone histology of Pterodaustro guinazui. Anatomical Record 292: 1462–1477. Google Scholar

11.

D.H. Enlow and S.O. Brown 1956. A comparative histological study of fossil and recent bone tissues. Part 1. Texas Journal of Science 8: 405–443. Google Scholar

12.

D.H. Enlow and S.O. Brown 1957. A comparative histological study of fossil and recent bone tissues. Part 2. Texas Journal of Science 9: 186–214. Google Scholar

13.

D.H. Enlow and S.O. Brown 1958. A comparative histological study of fossil and recent bone tissues. Part 3. Texas Journal of Science 10: 187–230. Google Scholar

14.

W. Felts and F. Spurrel 1966. Some structural and developmental characteristics of cetacean (odontocete) radii. A study of adaptive osteogenesis. American Journal of Anatomy 118: 103–134. Google Scholar

15.

M.S. Fernández 2003. Ophthalmosauria (Ichthyosauria) forefin from the Aalenian—Bajocian boundary of Mendoza Province, Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23: 691–694. Google Scholar

16.

H. Francillon-Vieillot , V. de Buffrénil, J. Castanet , J. Géraudie , F. J. Meunier , J.-Y. Sire , L. Zylberberg , and A. de Ricqlès 1990. Microstructure and mineralization of vertebrate skeletal tissues. In : J.G. Carter (ed.), Skeletal Biomineralization: Patterns, Processes and Evolutionary Trends, Volume I , 471—530. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. Google Scholar

17.

W. Gross 1934. Die Typen des mikroskopischen Knochenbaues bei fossilen Stegocephalen und Reptilien. Zeitschrift für Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte 203: 731–764. Google Scholar

18.

A. Houssaye 2009. “Pachyostosis” in aquatic amniotes: a review. Integrative Zoology 4: 325–340. Google Scholar

19.

A. Houssaye and N. Bardet 2012. Rib and vertebral micro-anatomical characteristics of hydro pelvic mosasauroids. Lethaia 45: 200–209. Google Scholar

20.

A. Houssaye , J. Lindgren , R. Pellegrini , A.H. Lee , D. Germain , and M.J. Polcyn 2013. Microanatomical and histological features in the long bones of mosasaurine mosasaurs (Reptilia, Squamata)—implications for aquatic adaptation and growth rates. Plos One 8: e76741. Google Scholar

21.

A. Houssaye , T.M. Scheyer , C. Kolb , V. Fischer , and P.M. Sander 2014. A new look at ichthyosaur long bone microanatomy and histology: Implications for their adaptation to an aquatic life. Plos One 9: e95637. Google Scholar

22.

K. Kashiyama and T. Oji 2004. Low-diversity shallow marine benthic fauna from the Smithian of northeast Japan: paleoecologic and paleobiogeographic implications. Paleontological Research 8: 199–218. Google Scholar

23.

G. Kawakami and M. Kawamura 2002. Sediment flow and deformation (SFD) layers: evidence for intrastratal flow in laminated muddy sediments of the Triassic Osawa Formation, northeast Japan. Journal of Sedimentary Research 72: 171–181. Google Scholar

24.

W. Kiprijanov 1881. Studien über die Fossilen Reptilien Russlands. Theil 1 Gattung Ichthyosaurus König aus dem severischen Sandstein oder Osteolith der Kreide-Gruppe. Mémoires de l'Académie impériale des Sciences de St.-Pétersbourg, VIIe Série 28: 1–103. Google Scholar

25.

C. Kolb , M.R. Sánchez-Villagra , and T.M. Scheyer 2011. The paleohistology of the basal ichthyosaur Mixosaurus Baur, 1887 (Ichthyopterygia, Mixosauridae) from the Middle Triassic: Palaeobiological implications. Comptes Rendus Palevol 10: 403–411. Google Scholar

26.

T. Lingham-Soliar and W.-E. Reif 1998. Taphonomic evidence for fast tuna-like swimming in Jurassic and Cretaceous ichthyosaurs. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 207: 171–183. Google Scholar

27.

V.B. Lopuchowycz and J.A. Massare 2002. Bone microstructure of a Cretaceous ichthyosaur. Paludicola 3: 139–147 Google Scholar

28.

M.W. Maisch 2010. Phylogeny, systematics, and origin of the Ichthyosauria—the state of the art. Palaeodiversity 3: 151–214. Google Scholar

29.

E. de Margerie , J. Cubo , and J. Castanet 2002. Bone typology and growth rate: testing and quantifying “Amprino's rule” in the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos). Comptes Rendus Biologies 325: 221–230. Google Scholar

30.

E. de Margerie , J.-P. Robin , D. Varrier , J. Cubo R. Groscolas , and J. Castanet 2004. Assessing a relationship between bone microstructure and growth rate: a fluorescent labelling study in the king penguin chick (Aptenodytes patagonicus). Journal of Experimental Biology 207: 869–879. Google Scholar

31.

C. McGowan and R. Motani 2003. Handbook of Paleoherpetology. Part 8. Ichthyopterygia. {pages?}. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München. Google Scholar

32.

L. Montes , J. Castanet , and J. Cubo 2010. Relationships between bone growth rate and bone tissue organization in amniotes: first test of Amprino's rule in a phylogenetic context. Animal Biology 60: 25–41. Google Scholar

33.

R. Motani 1997. New information on the forefin of Utatsusaurus hataii (Ichthyosauria). Journal of Paleontology 71: 475–479. Google Scholar

34.

R. Motani 1999. Phylogeny of the Ichthyopterygia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 19: 473–496. Google Scholar

35.

R. Motani 2000. Is Omphalosaurus ichthyopterygian?—a phylogenetic perspective. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 20: 295–301. Google Scholar

36.

R. Motani 2002. Scaling effects in caudal fin propulsion and the speed of ichthyosaurs. Nature 415: 309–312. Google Scholar

37.

R. Motani 2005. Evolution of fish-shaped reptiles (Reptilia: Ichthyopterygia) in their physical environments and constraints. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 33: 395–420 Google Scholar

38.

R. Motani 2010. Warm-blooded “sea dragons”? Science 328: 1362–1362. Google Scholar

39.

R. Motani , N. Minoura , and T. Ando 1998. Ichthyosaurian relationships illuminated by new primitive skeletons from Japan. Nature 393: 255–256. Google Scholar

40.

R. Motani , H. You , and C. McGowan 1996. Eel-like swimming in the earliest ichthyosaurs. Nature 382: 347–348. Google Scholar

41.

K. Padian , J.R. Horner , and A. de Ricqlès 2004. Growth in small dinosaurs and pterosaurs: The evolution of archosaurian growth strategies. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 24: 555–571. Google Scholar

42.

K. Padian , A. de Ricqlès , and J.R. Horner 2001. Dinosaurian growth rates and bird origins. Nature 412: 405–408. Google Scholar

43.

S. Ray , J. Botha , and A. Chinsamy 2004. Bone histology and growth pattern of some nonmammalian therapsids. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 24: 634–648. Google Scholar

44.

A.G.J. Rhodin 1985. Comparative chondro-osseous development and growth of marine turtles. Copeia 1985: 752–771. Google Scholar

45.

A. de Ricqlés 1976. On bone histology of fossil and living reptiles, with comments on its functional and evolutionary significance. In : A. d'A. Bellairs and C.B. Cox (eds.), Morphology and Biology of Reptiles , Volume 3 , 123–149. Linnean Society Symposium Series, London. Google Scholar

46.

A. de Ricqlés and V. de Buffrénil 2001. Bone histology, heterochronies and the return of tetrapods to life in water: where are we? In : J.-M. Mazin and V. de Buffrénil (eds.), Secondary Adaptation of Tetrapods to Life in Water , 289–310. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, Munich. Google Scholar

47.

P.M. Sander 2000. Ichthyosauria: their diversity, distribution, and phylogeny. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 74: 1–35. Google Scholar

48.

P.M. Sander and C. Faber 1998 New finds of Omphalosaurus and a review of Triassic ichthyosaur paleobiogeography. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 72: 149–162. Google Scholar

49.

P.M. Sander and C. Faber 2003 The Triassic marine reptile Omphalosaurus: Osteology, jaw anatomy, and evidence for ichthyosaurian affinities. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23: 799–816. Google Scholar

50.

T.M. Scheyer , N. Klein , and P.M. Sander 2010. Developmental palaeontology of Reptilia as revealed by histological studies. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 21: 462–470. Google Scholar

51.

A.L.L. Seitz 1907. Vergleichende Studien über den mikroskopischen Knochenbau fossiler und rezenter Reptilien, und dessen Bedeutung für das Wachstum und Umbildung des Knochengewebes im Allgemeinen. Nova Acta, Abhandlungen der Kaiserlich Leopoldinisch-Carolinisch Deutschen Akademie der Naturforscher 87: 230– 370. Google Scholar

52.

A. Sheldon 1997. Ecological implications of mosasaur bone microstructure. In : J.M. Callaway and E.L. Nicholls (eds.), Ancient Marine Reptiles , Volume 11 , 293–332. Academic Press, San Diego. Google Scholar

53.

T. Shikama , T. Kamei , and M. Murata 1978. Early Triassic Ichthyosaurus, Utatsusaurus hataii, gen. et sp. nov., from the Kitakami Massif, Northeast Japan. The Science Reports of the Tohoku University, Second Series, Geology 48: 77–97. Google Scholar

54.

M. Talevi and M.S. Fernández 2012. Unexpected skeletal histology of an ichthyosaur from the Middle Jurassic of Patagonia: implications for evolution of bone micro structure among secondary aquatic tetrapods. Naturwissenschaften 99: 241–244. Google Scholar

55.

M. Talevi , M. Fernández , and L. Salgado 2012. Variación ontogenética en la histología ósea de Caypullisaurus bonapartei Fernández, 1997 (Ichthyosauria: Ophthalmosauridae). Ameghiniana 49: 38–46. Google Scholar

56.

J. Wiffen , V. de Buffrénil, A. de Ricqlès , and J.-M. Mazin 1995. Ontogenetic evolution of bone structure in Late Cretaceous Plesiosauria from New Zealand. Geobios 28: 625–640. Google Scholar

57.

C. Wiman 1910. Ichthyosaurier aus der Trias Spitzbergens. Bulletin of the Geological Institute of the University of Upsalla 10: 124–148. Google Scholar
Copyright © 2014 Y. Nakajima et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Yasuhisa Nakajima, Alexandra Houssaye, and Hideki Endo "Osteohistology of the Early Triassic Ichthyopterygian Reptile Utatsusaurus hataii: Implications for Early Ichthyosaur Biology," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 59(2), 343-352, (1 June 2014). https://doi.org/10.4202/app.2012.0045
Received: 4 April 2012; Accepted: 29 September 2012; Published: 1 June 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top