How to translate text using browser tools
8 December 2024 Differential response by seedlings of three sub-boreal conifer species to high- and low-carbon wood ash amendment
P. Michael Rutherford, Hugues B. Massicotte, William B. McGill, Ché E. Elkin, Linda E. Tackaberry
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

In Canada, there is a need to implement value-added uses for wood ash (hereafter ash) generated from bioenergy facilities as most ash is landfilled. Ash application to forests can provide benefit via nutrient supply, amelioration of soil acidity and, sometimes, increased tree growth. However, information is limited on the response of conifer species to different wood ash types applied to fine-textured soil typical of north-central B.C. We conducted a 16-month seedling pot trial that examined the response of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia), and hybrid white spruce (Picea glauca × engelmannii) to high- (HCA) and low-carbon ashes (LCA) applied (up to 10 Mg mineral matter ha−1 equiv.), with and without fertilizer N (200 kg N ha−1 equiv.), to fine-textured forest soil. Pine and spruce exhibited a 1.6- and 1.4-fold increase in shoot biomass at the high rate of HCA with fertilizer N. At study end, the high rate of LCA had the greatest soil pH, EC and total K in the upper forest floor, but the HCA had greater total B, P and Zn. LCA elicited increased foliar B in pine, but HCA increased foliar Ca in spruce when co-applied with fertilizer N. In general, Douglas-fir growth did not respond to ash treatments, and seedling mortality was observed in some LCA treatments. Ash treatments helped offset some nutrient deficiencies induced by N fertilization. Ash type influenced soil chemical as well as seedling growth and nutrition responses.

P. Michael Rutherford, Hugues B. Massicotte, William B. McGill, Ché E. Elkin, and Linda E. Tackaberry "Differential response by seedlings of three sub-boreal conifer species to high- and low-carbon wood ash amendment," Canadian Journal of Soil Science 104(4), 399-417, (8 December 2024). https://doi.org/10.1139/cjss-2024-0010
Received: 21 February 2024; Accepted: 16 July 2024; Published: 8 December 2024
JOURNAL ARTICLE
19 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
Douglas-fir
forest soil
hybrid spruce
lodgepole pine
soil amendment
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top