Gautier, L., C.G. Boluda, R. Randrianaivo & Y. Naciri (2022). Two further new species in the highly-diverse Malagasy endemic genus Capurodendron (Sapotaceae). Candollea 77: 119–126. In English, English and French abstracts.
During the course of a revision of the Malagasy species of the family Sapotaceae, two new species from the dry forest belonging to the highly-diverse endemic genus Capurodendron Aubrév. were discovered. The first one, C. mikearum L. Gaut. & Boluda, earlier hypothesised to be a hybrid, emerged as a valid species without any hybrid signal, based on a combination of genetic and morphological analyses of a species complex from the southwestern region. The second species, C. namorokense L. Gaut. & Boluda, occupies a basal position in the same species clade. It is clearly morphologically distinct and geographically distant, so far only being known from northwestern Madagascar. Both species are described and illustrated by line drawings and field photographs. Preliminary conservation assessments using the IUCN Red List criteria indicate that both species are threatened (EN and CR, respectively).
Received on January 6, 2022. Accepted on April 27, 2022. First published online on June 1, 2022.
Introduction
Capurodendron Aubrév. is a genus that was described by Aubréville (1962) to accommodate seven Malagasy species of Sapotaceae originally described within Sideroxylon L. In the Sapotaceae treatment for the Flore de Madagascar et des Comores (Aubréville, 1974) 16 additional species and three varieties were described. With a total of 23 species, it was ranked as the third richest endemic plant genus on Madagascar (Callmander et al., 2011). Since then, three new species have been described (Gautier & Naciri, 2018).
As part of a systematic study of the family Sapotaceae in Madagascar, a molecular analysis of the genus Capurodendron has been conducted, involving gene capture and next generation sequencing (see methodology in Christe et al., 2021). Based on a survey of all specimens available in the herbaria G, K, MO, P, TAN and TEF, the c. 900 collections of Capurodendron were classified in morphospecies following a splitting approach. These species candidates were then sampled for molecular study, including adequate geographic representation of widespread and disjunct morphospecies. The analysis of 638 genes (Christe et al., 2021; Boluda et al., 2022) confirmed the placement of the genus in the tribe Tseboneae (Gautier et al., 2013) and showed a massive radiation with numerous new species, upgrading Capurodendron as the richest endemic Malagasy genus with 33 described species so far.
Boluda et al. (2021) characterized the so-called “Arid Complex”, comprising Capurodendron androyense Aubrév., C. mandrarense Aubrév., and some specimens collected north of the city of Toliara which were morphologically hypothesised to be hybrids between C. mandrarense and C. greveanum Aubrév. This complex was part of a lineage containing also C. microphyllum (Scott-Elliott) Aubrév., C. nanophyllum L. Gaut. & Naciri, and an undescribed taxon (“C. sp. 20” of Boluda et al., 2021) recently collected in the Tsingy de Namoroka.
In the study focused on the “Arid Complex” by Boluda et al. (2021), 381 collections were morphologically analysed, and 85 samples were selected for a molecular study including highly variable markers able to detect population structure. This confirmed “C. sp. 20” as a distinct undescribed species (hereafter Capurodendron namorokense L. Gaut. & Boluda) and revealed that the suspected hybrids between C. mandrarense and C. greveanum actually represent another undescribed species nested within the “Arid Complex” (hereafter C. mikearum L. Gaut. & Boluda). While genetic introgression was detected between C. androyense and C. mandrarense, including hybridization, C. mikearum displayed no hybridization signals with the two former closely related species, and was morphologically, geographically and ecologically differentiated. It was only distantly related to C. greveanum, which was retrieved in a clade sister to that of the “Arid Complex”.
Here we formally describe these two new species and provide conservation assessments following the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (IUCN, 2012), with the Extent of Occurrence [EOO] and Area of Occupancy [AOO] calculated using GeoCAT (2022). The descriptions are accompanied by two line drawings and field photographs. Specimen records can be accessed for each species via the Catalogue of the Plants of Madagascar (Madagascar Catalogue, 2022).
Systematics
Capurodendron mikearum L. Gaut. & Boluda, sp. nov. (Fig. 1, 2A–E).
Holotypus: Madagascar. Reg. Atsimo-Andrefana [Prov. Toliara]: Tuléar II, Belalanda, Ranobe, forêt de Ranobe PK32, 23°00′46″S 43°39′02″E, 101 m, 25.XI.2006, fl., Razafindraibe et al. 165 (G [G00390469]!, iso-: MO-6427623!, P, TAN!)
Capurodendron mikearum L. Gaut. & Boluda differs from its closest relative C. mandrarense Aubrév. by its glabrous lower leaf surface (vs. pubescent), with secondary nerves that are slightly raised (vs. conspicuously raised). It differs from the morphologically similar C. greveanum Aubrév. by its greyish pubescent young shoots (vs. green and glabrous), petioles with scattered trichomes (vs. glabrous), the presence of brachyblasts, and the very dense calyx indumentum (vs. sparse).
Tree, sometimes shrub, up to 18 m tall, 60 cm DBH, bark greyish, profoundly fissured longitudinally, outer wood pinkish, with white latex, inner wood light yellow; terminal twigs 2 mm in diam., at first densely brown-whitish curly pubescent, later glabrous, 2-year twigs pale to dark grey, longitudinally wrinkled, lenticels inconspicuous; brachyblasts present, 0.5–1(–3) cm long; stipules soon caducous, ovato-triangular, 1.5–2 mm long, densely pubescent on outer side. Leaves probably caducous; petioles 1.1–2.8 cm long, 0.8 mm in diam., with scattered thin whitish trichomes; blade oblanceolate to elliptical, rarely rounded, 2.2–5.5 × 1.4–3.2 cm, base cuneate to attenuate, apex rounded, sometimes acute, margin entire, with pubescent indumentum initially, soon becoming almost glabrous on both surfaces, except on the midrib of the lower surface that retains scattered yellowish to whitish trichomes, slightly discolorous in living plants (upper surface shiny, lower paler); midrib slightly prominent below, flat or slightly raised above, 8–13 pairs of camptodromous secondary veins spreading at 30–45°, straight or arching towards the leaf apex, slightly raised on both surfaces, pale green or yellowish, intersecondaries absent or when present similar to the tertiaries, tertiary veins sparse, slightly raised on dried specimens, forming irregular cells that contains a quaternary venation forming isodiametric polygons. Flowers solitary to 6-fasciculate, 6–9 × 5–7 mm, on last year shoots and brachyblasts, flowering sometimes profuse and packed; pedicels 3–6 × 0.7–1 mm, enlarging distally below calyx, densely pubescent; sepals 5, quincuncial, ovate-lanceolate, apex slightly acute, two outers 4–6.5 × 3.2–3.9 mm (at base), densely golden pubescent inside and outside, three inners 3.4–5 × 2.9–5.3 mm (at base), with scattered trichomes inside and densely pubescent outside except the margin; corolla gamopetalous, 5-lobed, pale yellowish or white, tube c. 3 mm long, lobes lanceolate, 3.5–5.3 × 1.1–1.9 mm, glabrous, erect, convex and enfolding the anther. Stamens 5, filaments cylindrical, 1.1–1.6 × 0.3–0.5 mm, same colour as the petals, glabrous, attached to the top of the corolla tube; anthers cream-coloured, lanceolate, 1.9–2.4 × 0.8–1 mm, medifixed, cordate at the base, extrorse, each theca lanceolate, 1.9–2.4 × c. 0.3 mm; connective hairy, prolonged into a 0.3 mm long mucro. Staminodes 5, alternate with respect to petals and stamens, ovate-triangular, same colour as the petals, 2.9–4.2 × 1–1.5 mm, with an arista 1.6–2.7 mm long, carnose, glabrous except on the margins which are densely hirsute with trichomes that may bend and cover the complete outer surface, connivent and concealing the ovary at least during part of anthesis. Ovary slightly pentagonal, 1.4 × 1.4 mm, with 5 uniovulate locules, densely hirsute; style 5–7.5 × 0.4 mm, glabrous; stigma with 5 minute papillae. Fruit on a thickened pedicel 3 mm in diam., globose to ovoid, 14–22 × 11–15 mm, apiculate, glabrescent, with a persistent enlarged (c. 2 ×) calyx; seeds one per fruit, 15–19 × 13 × 11 mm, testa shiny, scar basiventral, 11–13 × 6–8 mm.
Etymology. – This species is named after the Mikea ethnic group which inhabits the forests where the species is found.
Distribution, ecology and phenology. – Capurodendron mikearum is endemic to Madagascar where it is found in the Atsimo Andrefana region (part of the former Toliara Province) from Morombe southward to Toliara, at elevations between 10–135 m, never more than 20 km away from the coast. It occurs in forests on laterite sands in a transition zone between dry deciduous forest and dry spiny thicket. The flowering period extends from November to March and fruits were recorded in November and from February to April.
Conservation status. – The estimated EOO calculated with all available herbarium specimen data is 1,755 km2, and the minimum AOO is 76 km2 (both qualifying for EN under criterion B). The species thrives at only five locations with respect to the most important threat, which is habitat transformation for large scale agriculture. Other important threats include uncontrolled forest fires and very probably selective logging. It is known from 26 herbarium collections. Although the five locations are in protected areas or in their close vicinity, the pressures encountered by the dry forests in the southwestern Madagascar are so high that a projected continuing decline is inferred and justifies the assignment of this species to the category “Endangered” [EN B1ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v)+2ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v)] (IUCN, 2012).
Notes. – Specimens attributed to this species have alternatively been identified as Capurodendron mandrarense or C. greveanum, as they share character states with both. The new species differs from its closest relative C. mandrarense by its glabrous lower leaf surface (vs. pubescent), with secondary nerves that are slightly raised (vs. conspicuously raised). It differs from the morphologically similar C. greveanum by its greyish pubescent young shoots (vs. green and glabrous), petioles with scattered trichomes (vs. glabrous), the presence of brachyblasts, and the very dense calyx indumentum (vs. sparse).
The three species occur in southwestern Madagascar and Capurodendron greveanum is even sympatric in the northernmost part of C. mikearum distribution. The hypothesised hybrid origin of this taxon has not been validated by the genetic studies we conducted, which indeed revealed that the new species was quite far from C. greveanum. It is however closely related to C. mandrarense. Together with the very distinctive C. androyense, these three species form the core of what has been referred as the “Arid Complex” (Boluda et al., 2021, 2022).
Additional specimens examined – Madagascar. Reg. Atsimo-Andrefana [Prov. Toliara]: Belalanda, Ranobe, 23°04′S 43°42′E, 110 m, 16.III.2006, fl. & old fl., Andrianjafy 1669 (G, MO, P, TAN); ibid. loco, 23°01′S 43°39′E, 100 m, 16.III.2006, fr. & old fl., Andrianjafy et al. 1679 (G, MO, P, TAN); Belakana, embouchure sur Fiherenana, [23°18′S 43°39′E], XI.1956, bud, Bosser 10408 (P, TEF); 12 km N of Tulear on road to Morombe, [23°15′S 43°38′E], c. 0 m, 5.II.1975, Croat 30799 (MO, TAN); 16–18 km N of Tulear along road to Morombe, [23°12′S 43°37′E], c. 0 m, 6.II.1975, Croat 30885 (MO, TAN); Ranobe PK 32, partie W, 15 km à l'ESE d'Ankilimalinika, 23°01′S 43°42′E, 130 m, 17.II.2017, old fl. & imm. fr., Gautier et al. 6329 (G, MO, P, TAN); ibid. loco, bud, Gautier et al. 6331 (G, TAN); ibid. loco, old fl., Gautier et al. 6332 (G, MO, P, TAN), 6333 (G, K, MO, P, S, TAN); Mikea, partie sud, 11 km à l'W d'Ankililoloaka, 22°47′S 43°31′E, 120 m, 18.II.2017, old fl., Gautier et al. 6336 (G, MO, P, TAN); ibid. loco, 120 m, 18.II.2017, ster., Gautier et al. 6337 (G, TAN); ibid. loco, 13.5 km à l'W d'Ankililoloaka, 22°47′S 43°29′E, 130 m, 18.II.2017, fl., Gautier et al. 6339 (G, K, MO, P, S, TAN); ibid. loco, ster., Gautier et al. 6340 (G, TAN); Ifaty, dans l'arboretum, 23°07′S 43°37′E, 10 m, 18.II.2017, ster., Gautier et al. 6341 (G, MO, P, TAN); Songaritelo, [23°14′S 43°37′E], 23.IX.1967, ster., Koechlin 44 (P); N of Toliara, forêt de Mikea, c. 18 road-km W of Vorehe, [22°16′S 43°26′E], 50 m, 8.II.1998, old fl., McPherson et al. 17358 (G, MO); Mikea Forest, 22°47′S 43°31′E, 130 m, 20.XI.2002, fl., Phillipson 5603 (G, MO, P); Ifaty, 23°09′S 43°37′E, 14.I.1994, old fl. & fl., Rabesandratana 4192 (P); Tulear II, Belalanda, forêt de Ranobe, 23°18′S 43°39′E, 35 m, 18.XI.2002, fr., Ranaivojaona 459 (G, MO, P, TAN); Toliara II, Ankilimalinika, forêt de Ranobe, 23°00′S 43°41′E, 100 m, 24.IV.2005, fr., Randrianaivo & Randrianarivelo 1187 (G, MO, P, TAN); 35 km N of Toliara, along coast road, 23°4′S 43°35′E, 20 m, 12.XII.1988, fl. & old fl., Schatz & Miller 2477 (MO, P, S, TAN); au bord d'un chemin qui mène vers Mambo, Ankazomanga Tosimitro, [23°16′S 43°43′E], 19.VI.1954, old fl., Service Forestier 10220 (P); rte de Tuléar à Sarodrano, au pied des falaises du plateau calcaire, [23°29′S 43°46′E], 16.III.1961, fr., Service Forestier 20178 (P, TEF); Sarodrano et environs, [23°32′S 43°45′E], XII.1961, fl., Service Forestier 20831 (MO, P, TEF); sables littoraux au S de Morombe, [21°48′S 43°21′E], 1.XII.1969, fl., Service Forestier 28965 (MO, P, TEF).
Capurodendron namorokense L. Gaut. & Boluda, sp. nov. (Fig. 2F–G, 3).
Holotypus: Madagascar. Reg. Melaky [Prov. Mahajanga]: Tsingy de Namoroka, sur Tsingy, 16°27′39″S 45°16′35″E, 146 m, 25.X.2016, old fl., Gautier et al. 6276 (G [G0419383]!; iso-: P [P00947295]!, MO!, S!, TAN!)
Capurodendron namorokense L. Gaut. & Boluda resembles C. antongiliense Aubrév., C. birkinshawii L. Gaut. & Boluda and C. nodosum Aubrév. in its medium-sized leaves (blade 5.5–12 cm long) with 10–15 straight secondary veins that are regularly spaced and clearly raised on lower surface. It however differs from the latter three species by the lack of an obvious Aubréville branching pattern in terminal shoots and by its smaller outer calyx lobes (5.5 mm vs. 9–11 mm long). It further differs from C. birkinshawii by the acute leaf base (vs. broadly rounded to subcordate) and from both C. birkinshawii and C. antongiliense by its smaller stipules (< 5 mm vs. > 6 mm long).
Tree, 11 m tall, 30 cm DBH, outer bark greyish, deeply fissured longitudinally, slash pink, with white latex; terminal twigs 2.5–4 mm in diam., glabrescent, with leaves clustered at the distal 1–2 cm, twig bark pale to medium grey, smooth to longitudinally wrinkled, profusely warted by the attachment of previous years' leaves, later with short transversal cracks; brachyblasts absent; stipules triangular, 4 × 2 mm at base, felted outside, glabrous inside. Leaves chartaceous, caducous; petiole 9–17 × c. 1 mm, tomentose, terete proximally and semi-terete distally; leaf blade elliptic, 5.5–12 × 2.2–3.7 cm, base acute, apex obtuse, margin entire to slightly sinuous, frequently revolute, glabrous adaxially, whitish-tomentose abaxially, slightly bullate; midrib slightly prominent adaxially, very prominent abaxially, tomentose, 10–15 pairs of craspedodromous raised secondary veins spreading at 60–80°, straight, arching in the last millimetres to form a marginal vein, intersecondaries present, similar to the secondary veins but dissolving half-way to the margin, tertiary veins slightly conspicuous adaxially, inconspicuous abaxially, irregular, not forming well-delimited cells. Flowers solitary or in pairs, at the base of the current years' shoots; pedicels 9–12 × 0.5–1 mm, tomentose. Sepals (old flowers) 5, quincuncial, two outers sub-triangular to ovato-lanceolate, 5.5 × 4 mm, apex subacute, sparsely tomentose inside except in the central portion, tomentose outside, three inners lanceolate, 4.8 × 4 mm, apex subacute, glabrous inside and densely pubescent with adpressed trichomes outside except at the overlapping margins. Corolla, stamens and staminodes unknown. Ovary (in late flowering state) with 5 uniovulate locules, densely hirsute with beige trichomes. Fruit unknown.
Etymology. – The specific epithet refers to the Tsingy de Namoroka, where the species was found.
Distribution, ecology and phenology. – Capurodendron namorokense is known only from northwestern Madagascar, thriving in dry deciduous forest on limestone outcrops (tsingy). The single known specimen has been collected in October, with old flowers.
Conservation status. – Capurodendron namorokense is known only from a single locality within the Tsingy de Namoroka Protected Area, only 800 m from its border. Its AOO is 4 km2 and its EOO is estimated to be less than 100 km2 (both qualifying for CR under criterion B). The species is documented in only one location with respect to the most probable threat which is selective logging. As most Capurodendron species are actively logged for their valuable timber, it has to be considered as threatened by selective logging despite the natural protection that the tsingy environment provides, and a population decline is projected. On this basis, the species is assessed as “Critically Endangered” [CR B1ab(i,ii,iii,v)+2ab(i,ii,iii,v)] (IUCN, 2012).
Notes. – Capurodendron namorokense can be recognised by the characteristic venation pattern of its leaves, which is only slightly reminiscent of C. antongilense, C. birkinshawii, and C. nodosum. Genetically, it is retrieved with C. nanophyllum at the base of the “Arid Complex”, comprised of C. androyense, C. mandrarense, C. microphyllum, and C. mikearum (Boluda et al., 2021). The species of this clade are restricted to the southern half of the island whereas C. namorokense is known only from northwestern Madagascar.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant from the Swiss National Foundation awarded to YN (No. 31003A-166349), a grant from the Franklinia Foundation to LG (No. 2019-20), and by two grants from the Schmidheiny Foundation attributed to YN in 2016 and 2018. We thank the Malagasy Government for authorization to conduct research, perform collections, and export samples. We are also much grateful to protected areas managers and local guides on-site for their kindness and assistance while collecting Sapotaceae specimens. Many thanks are also addressed to Thierry Bourgoin and Lucile Allorge from Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, for organizing the Namoroka expedition and inviting LG to participate. We are grateful to the curators and staff of the herbaria G, K, MO, P, TAN, and TEF for allowing us to study their specimens and to perform limited destructive sampling. Lastly, we thank Gabriela Loza for the very fine drawings, three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments, and the editors of Candollea for improving the manuscript.