BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2018 Predation Functional Response and Life Table Parameters of Orius sauteri (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) Feeding on Megalurothrips usitatus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)
Pingping Liu, Wantong Jia, Xuan Zheng, Liu Zhang, Rouguiatou Sangbaramou, Shuqian Tan, Yiqing Liu, Wangpeng Shi
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Bean flower thrips, Megalurothrips usitatus (Bagnall) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), is a serious pest of cowpea in Hainan province, China. In this study, the predation functional response and life table parameters of the minute pirate bug, Orius sauteri (Poppius) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), feeding on M. usitatus were measured in the laboratory. The functional response of O. sauteri to increasing M. usitatus density was described by Holling's disc equation, and the maximum predation rate was 45.3 over 24 h. The intraspecific interference of O. sauteri was significant with increasing O. sauteri density. Orius sauteri was able to complete its life cycle feeding on M. usitatus, with an intrinsic rate of increase (r) of 0.16 and fecundity of 95.4 eggs per female. Female and male minute pirate bugs consumed an average of 304.7 and 104.0 thrips over their lifetimes, respectively. These results show O. sauteri to be a potential biological control agent in the integrated pest management of M. usitatus.

Megalurothrips usitatus (Bagnall) (Thysanoptera:Thripidae) is known as bean flower thrips, Asian bean thrips, bean blossom thrips, blossom thrips, or flower thrips. Whatever it is called, M. usitatus is an important and widely distributed pest of legumes in Asia (Mound & Walker 1987; Palmer 1987).

In Hainan province of China, thrips feeding on legume crops, especially cowpeas and snap beans, have caused serious losses (Tang et al. 2015). In one study, nearly all of the thrips (97.9%) damaging to cowpeas were M. usitatus (Fan et al. 2013). Currently, chemical insecticides are the principal method for controlling this thrips, but their use is not always efficient due to the biological characteristics of thrips such as their habit of staying within flowers and their short life cycles. Alternative strategies for thrips control, therefore, are needed.

The natural enemies of M. usitatus include some parasitoids and several predators. The parasitoid Ceranisus menes (Walker) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) was observed parasitizing larvae of M. usitatus in adzuki bean fields by Chang (1990) in Taiwan and in the Philippines by Loomans (2006). In India, the predaceous bug Orius maxidentex Ghauri (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) is a biological agent used for control of M. usitatus (Men 1999). In Taiwan, Orius strigicollis (Poppious) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) suppresses populations of M. usitatus on adzuki beans (Vigna angularis var. angularis; Fabaceae) and sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas L.; Convolvulaceae) (Lee et al. 1991). However, there have been no reports on the local natural enemies of M. usitatus in Hainan. Orius sauteri (Poppius) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) is an efficient natural enemy, attacking a variety of thrips (Nagai & Yano 2000), and a number of methods have been found for augmenting species of Orius (Blaeser et al. 2004; Cocuzza et al. 1997a). Orius species have been successfully used for controlling thrips in several agricultural ecosystems in China. Previous work has found O. sauteri to be established in cowpea fields (Tang et al. 2016), and their control effect on M. usitatus observed. In this study, we examined the capacity of O. sauteri to prey on M. usitatus (functional response), and we measured the predator's life table parameters on this thrips as its sole food, including the bug's longevity, fecundity, duration of development, and daily prey consumption. The potential of this Orius species to control M. usitatus is evaluated in view of its practical use in cowpea fields.

Materials and Methods

INSECTS

A laboratory colony of M. usitatus came from Wanning City in Hainan province of China (18.7851°N, 110.3910°E), and was fed on kidney bean pods (Phaseolus vulgaris L.; Fabaceae) in 2 L glass jars. Orius sauteri were provided by the Biological Control Lab of China Agricultural University, Beijing, China, and were fed with the eggs of Angoumois grain moth (Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier); Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in the glass jars. In addition, the kidney bean pods were used as the oviposition substrate for both species. All experiments were conducted with reared insects at 26 ± 1 °C, 65% RH, and 16:8 h (L:D) in incubators (QX-256, Jiangnan Instrument Factory, Ningbo, China).

FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE TESTS

Three-d-old adult females of O. sauteri were fed with 3-d-old adult females of M. usitatus for 48 h and starved for 24 h. Then the bugs were transferred individually to plastic petri dishes (9 cm diam) and provided with 3-d-old adult females of M. usitatus at different densities (10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120 prey per predator, respectively). After 24 h, the number of prey consumed by each bug was recorded. Bugs were used once only. Meanwhile, a control treatment was carried out without predators. Each density included 5 replicates.

INTRASPECIFIC INTERFERENCE EXPERIMENT

To measure the reduction in prey consumption when various numbers of adult Orius bugs were held in the same arena with prey, we ran an intraspecific interference experiment in which 45 adult female thrips were held in an arena with different numbers of adult Orius (1, 2, 3, or 4). The number of prey consumed by the group of predators was checked after 24 h, and converted to a per predator basis. A control treatment was conducted without predators. Each treatment included 5 replicates.

LIFE TABLE STUDY

To determine the life table parameter for O. sauteri when fed with M. usitatus, the survival of a group of bugs under those conditions was followed. Kidney bean pods with O. sauteri eggs that were < 24 hrs old were isolated from the rearing colony, and held in the incubator as described above. After egg hatch, 30 first instar nymphs were chosen randomly and reared individually with 45 M. usitatus 3-d-old adult females daily as prey in 10 mL bottles. The kidney bean pods provided for the M. usitatus prey as their food was replaced daily. Mortality and nymphal instar were recorded daily for each insect under a stereomicroscope (SZ656, Optec, Chongqing, China) until nymphs molted to the adult stage.

Separately, to measure adult fecundity of O. sauteri on this prey, a male and a female of O. sauteri that emerged the same d were placed in the same bottle, and their survival and the number of eggs laid per female were recorded daily. Females inserted eggs in the bean pods and eggs were visible under the stereomicroscope. Pods with O. sauteri eggs were held in the incubator, where the hatching rate and progeny sex ratio were recorded. One female from each pair was a replicate, and there were 30 replicates.

PREDATION RATE

Newly hatched first instar nymphs were provided 45 three-d-old adult female thrips daily during the life table experiment. There were 30 replicate Orius for this study. Their daily predation was determined by counting the dead thrips and then replacing them with another groups of 45 three-d-old adult female thrips at the end of each day.

DATA ANALYSIS

Data from the functional response experiment were analyzed with SPSS 21 and fitted to the Holling's disc equation (Holling 1959):

e01_254.gif

where N A is the number of prey killed by predators during time T, which in this experiment was 1 d. T h is the predator handling time for 1 prey (= T divided by maximum predation rate), while a is a constant equal to the search rate multiplied by the probability of finding a prey. N is the density of prey. The search rate was calculated as per Ding (1994):

e02_254.gif

where E is the search rate.

The results of the intraspecific interference experiment were analyzed according to Hassell & Varley (1969):

e03_254.gif
e04_254.gif

where E is the predation rate, Q is the quest constant, P is the density of predators, N a is the number of the prey killed by predators, m is the mutual interference constant, and N is the density of the prey. Moreover, the intensity of scramble competition (I) was calculated as per Zou et al. (1996):

e05_254.gif

where E I is the predation rate for 1 predator, and E P is the predation rate for the predators with a density of P.

Life table parameters, as per Birch (1948), were calculated from the data as follows:

e06_254.gif

where l x was the age-specific survival rate; m x was the age-specific fecundity. Population parameters are r, the intrinsic rate of increase; λ, the finite rate of increase; R 0, the net reproductive rate, and T, the mean generation time.

The predation rates of O. sauteri at all stages on M. usitatus were analyzed according to the following formulas (Chi & Liu 1985; Chi 1988):

e10_254.gif

where s xj refers to the age-stage specific survival rate (where x = age and j = stage); c xj is the age-stage specific consumption rate; k x is the age-specific predation rate; C 0 is the net predation rate, and Q p is the transformation rate from the prey population to predator progeny. The parameters were calculated by using the TWOSEX-MSChart and CONSUME-MSChart programs designed by Chi (2009a, b).

Results

FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE OF ORIUS SAUTERI ON MEGALUROTHRIPS USITATUS

We found that O. sauteri was able to efficiently prey on M. usitatus, and its predation showed a decelerating (Type II) functional response to increasing M. usitatus number. When only 10 thrips were provided, O. sauteri consumed a mean of 9.4 thrips per predator per d, which indicates that the predators can efficiently find the thrips at low densities (Fig. 1). The functional response of O. sauteri adults to M. usitatus adults was calculated using Holling's disc equation, and the functional response parameters were estimated with equation (1). The maximum predation rate O. sauteri per individual adult female was 45.3 thrips per d (Table 1). At higher prey density, the predator search rate (per predator per d) declined, showing that O. sauteri needed to spend less time searching for prey at higher prey densities (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1.

Predation capacity of Orius sauteri adults for Megalurothrips usitatus adults at 26 °. Each value is the mean (± SE) of 5 replicates.

f01_254.jpg

Table 1.

Functional response of Orius sauteri adults to Megalurothrips usitatus adults as prey when reared at 26 °C. T h = predator handling time (for 1 prey); a = a constant equal to the search rate multiplied by the probability of finding a prey.

t01_254.gif

INTRASPECIFIC INTERFERENCE OF ORIUS SAUTERI

The predation capacity (prey consumption per predator) of O. sauteri decreased with increasing O. sauteri density within the test arena, due to scramble competition. When the predator density was 4, the intensity of scramble competition (I) was 0.76, indicating that the intraspecific interference of O. sauteri was significant (Table 2, Fig. 3).

AGE-STAGE, TWO-SEX LIFE TABLE

We found that O. sauteri eggs from adults that were fed on M. usitatus had a high hatch rate, and resulting nymphs had high survival rates at 26 °C (Fig. 4). In addition, O. sauteri adults fed on M. usitatus had a long oviposition period. The hatch rate of O. sauteri eggs was 59.7%. The mortality of first instar nymphs of O. sauteri was higher, whereas no mortality occurred in the fourth or fifth instars. The mean development period, pre-oviposition period, sex ratio, fecundity, female adult longevity, and male adult longevity of O. sauteri were 15.9 d, 2.1 d, 2.8 females per male, 95.4 eggs per female, 21.1 d, and 9.7 d, respectively (Table 3). The longevity of adult males of O. sauteri was much shorter than of females. At peak oviposition, O. sauteri laid 5 to 8 eggs per d, declining thereafter to 1 to 4 eggs each d until death (Fig. 5). Under the experimental conditions, net reproductive rate (R 0), mean generation time (T), the intrinsic rate of increase (r), and finite rate of increase (λ) of O. sauteri were 51.1 offspring per individual, 24.6 d, 0.16 d-1, and 1.2 d-1, respectively (Table 4).

Fig. 2.

Relationship between search rate of Orius sauteri adults and density of Megalurothrips usitatus adults at 26 °C.

f02_254.jpg

Table 2.

Predation (prey consumption per predator, mean ± SE), E I (predation rate for 1 predator) and I (intensity of scramble competition) among Orius sauteri adults at 26 °C.

t02_254.gif

PREDATION RATE

C 0 and Q P, calculated using equations 11 and 12, showed that O. sauteri consumed an average of 186.0 thrips over the course of its life, and that to lay 1 egg required the consumption of 3.6 thrips (Table 4). Except for the egg stage, O. sauteri of all life stages could kill thrips (Fig. 6). Nymphs increased their thrips consumption from about 2 to 10 thrips a d. Male consumption was 3 to 9 thrips each d, which was less than that of females, while survival time for males was much shorter than for females. The total predation by O. sauteri nymphs, and by adult females and males, was 3.5 to 30.8, 233.1, and 39.5 per stadium, respectively (Table 5). Thrips consumption increased as O. sauteri progressed, and after the fourth instar the predation rate increased rapidly. Males consumed an average of 104.0 thrips over their entire lifetime, whereas females consumed an average of 304.7 thrips during their lifetime. The age-stage specific predation rate (k x), the survival rate (l x), and the age-specific net predation rate (l x k x) were calculated with equation 10. Predation peaked in 5 to 9-d-old adults, which coincided with peak oviposition (Fig. 7).

Discussion

Many thrips are serious pests in agriculture and forest ecosystems worldwide. Although biological control is an environmentally friendly method for control of thrips, there have been few studies on the biological control of M. usitatus in the field in China. Orius species are effective natural enemies of thrips, and studies have found the thrips Megalurothrips sjostedti Trybom, Neohydatothrips variabilis (Beach), Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande, and Thrips palmi Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) to be effectively preyed upon by various species of Orius, including O. albidipennis Reuter, O. insidiosus (Say), O. majusculus (Reuter), O. laevigatus (Fieber), and O. sauteri (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) (Gitonga et al. 2002; Butler & O'Neil 2007; Montserrat et al. 2000; Hemerik & Yano 2010; Xu & Enkegaard 2009). The predation effects of O. sauteri on M. usitatus have not been previously reported, and we found that the daily peak of 45.3 thrips preyed on by O. sauteri was higher than that reported by Xu & Enkegaard (2009) or Hemerik & Yano (2010) under similar conditions at 26 °.

Fig. 3.

Relationship between density of Orius sauteri adults and intensity of scramble competition (I) on Megalurothrips usitatus adults.

f03_254.jpg

Fig. 4.

Age-stage survival rate (s xj) of Orius sauteri on Megalurothrips usitatus at 26 °C.

f04_254.jpg

Food consumption rates can influence immature developmental rates (Hayes & Mcardle 1987), and is an important parameter for the evaluation of a potential biological control agent. In this study, the predation rates of female and male O. sauteri on M. usitatus were similar to that of O. laevigatus, O. albidipennis, and O. sauteri (Cocuzza et al. 1997b; Wang et al. 2014a).

The feeding preferences of generalist predators adjust to the local relative abundance of available prey (Jaworski et al. 2013; Klauschies et al. 2016), which means that a generalist predator such as O. sauteri may feed preferentially on the most abundant local prey. When fed on thrips ad lib, the developmental period of O. sauteri nymphs did not significantly differ between 2 prey (M. usitatus vs. F. occidentalis) (Wang et al. 2014b). The fecundity of O. sauteri feeding on M. usitatus was higher than that of O. albidipennis feeding on M. sjostedti, or that of O. laevigatus or O. albidipennis feeding on F. occidentalis, or that of O. minutus (L.) or O. niger (Wolf.) feeding on Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Gitonga et al. 2002; Cocuzza et al. 1997b; Fathi 2009).

Table 3.

Age-specific life table of Orius sauteri feeding on Megalurothrips usitatus in the laboratory at 26 °C.

t03_254.gif

Fig. 5.

Age-specific survival rate (l x), and age-specific fecundity (m x) of Orius sauteri on Megalurothrips usitatus at 26 °C.

f05_254.jpg

Table 4.

Population parameters (mean ± SE) of Orius sauteri feeding on Megalurothrips usitatus at 26 °C. R 0 = net reproductive rate; T = mean generation time; r = intrinsic rate of increase; λ = finite rate of increase; C 0 = net predation rate; Q p = transformation rate.

t04_254.gif

Fig. 6.

Age-stage predation rate (c xj) of Orius sauteri on the age-stage, 2-sex life table at 26 °C.

f06_254.jpg

Table 5.

Number of prey killed by different stages or sex (mean ± SE) of Orius sauteri at 26 °C.

t05_254.gif

Fig. 7.

Age-specific survival rate (l x), predation rate (k x), and age-specific net predation rate of Orius sauteri on Megalurothrips usitatus using the age-stage, 2-sex life table.

f07_254.jpg

The efficiency of predator consumption of prey has been found to be influenced by a number of factors (Nagai & Yano 2000; Reitz et al. 2006). In our study, the density, developmental stage, and sex of the prey or predator were the factors that affected the predatory efficiency of O. sauteri. The complexity of the spatial environment, including consumption under field conditions and interference of other prey on the predators, all need to be studied further.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the “Twelve-Five National Science and Technology Support Program of China” under Grant 2014BAD16B07 & 2014BAD23B01, “National Li Chanye Jishu Tixi” under Grant CARS-29-05B, “Hainan Key R&D Program” under Grant ZDYF2017050, and “International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China” under Grant 2015DFR30290.

References Cited

1.

Birch LC. 1948. The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. Journal of Animal Ecology 17: 15–26. Google Scholar

2.

Blaeser P, Sengonca C, Zegula T. 2004. The potential use of different predatory bug species in the biological control of Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Journal of Pest Science 77: 211–219. Google Scholar

3.

Butler CD, O'Neil RJ. 2007. Life history characteristics of Orius insidiosus (Say) fed diets of soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura and soybean thrips, Neohydatothrips variabilis (Beach). Biological Control 40: 339–346. Google Scholar

4.

Chang N. 1990. Ceranisus menes (Walker) (Eulophidae: Hymenoptera), a new parasite of bean flower thrips, Megalurothrips usitatus (Bagnall) (Thripidae: Thysanoptera). Plant Protection Bulletin 32: 237–238. Google Scholar

5.

Chi H. 1988. Life-table analysis incorporating both sexes and variable development rate among individuals. Environmental Entomology 17: 26–34. Google Scholar

6.

Chi H. 2009a. TWOSEX-MSChart: a computer program for the age-stage, twosex life table analysis.  http://140.120.197.173/Ecology/ (last accessed 14 Sep 2016). Google Scholar

7.

Chi H. 2009b. CONSUME-MSChart: a computer program for the age-stage, two-sex life table analysis.  http://140.120.197.173/Ecology/ (last accessed 14 Sep 2016). Google Scholar

8.

Chi H, Liu H. 1985. Two new methods for study of insect population ecology. Bulletin of the Institute of Zoology, Academia Sinica 24: 225–240. Google Scholar

9.

Cocuzza GE, DeClercq P, VandeVeire M, DeCock A, Degheele D, Vacante V. 1997a. Reproduction of Orius laevigatus and Orius albidipennis on pollen and Ephestia kuehniella eggs. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 82: 101–104. Google Scholar

10.

Cocuzza GE, De Clercq P, Lizzio S, Van de Veire M, Tirry L, Degheele D, Vacante V. 1997b. Life tables and predation activity of Orius laevigatus and O. albidipennis at three constant temperatures. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 85: 189–198. Google Scholar

11.

Ding Y. 1994. Insect Mathematical Ecology. Science Press, Beijing, China. Google Scholar

12.

Fan Y, Tong X, Gao L, Wang M, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Yang Y. 2013. The spatial aggregation pattern of dominant species of thrips on cowpea in Hainan. Journal of Environmental Insects 35: 737–743. Google Scholar

13.

Fathi SAA. 2009. The abundance of Orius niger (Wolf.) and O. minutus (L.) in potato fields and their life table parameters when fed on two prey species. Journal of Pest Science 82: 267–272. Google Scholar

14.

Gitonga LM, Overholt WA, Löhr B, Magambo JK, Mueke JM. 2002. Functional response of Orius albidipennis (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) to Megalurothrips sjostedti (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Biological Control 24: 1–6. Google Scholar

15.

Hassell MP, Varley GC. 1969. New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control. Nature 223: 1113–1137. Google Scholar

16.

Hayes AJ, Mcardle BH. 1987. A laboratory study on the predatory mite Typhlodromus pyri (Acarina: Phytoseiidae): I. the effect of temperature and food consumption on the rate of development of the eggs and immature stages. Resource Population Ecology 29: 73–83. Google Scholar

17.

Hemerik L, Yano E. 2010. A simulation model for the functional response of Orius sauteri on eggplant leaves with Thrips palmi: implications for biological control. Proceedings of the Netherlands Entomological Society Meeting 14: 61–74. Google Scholar

18.

Holling CS. 1959. Some characteristics of simple type of predation and parasitism. Canadian Entomologist 91: 385–398. Google Scholar

19.

Jaworski CC, Bompard A, Genies L, Amiens-Desneux E, Desneux N. 2013. Preference and prey switching in a generalist predator attacking local and invasive alien pests. PLoS One 8: 1–10. Google Scholar

20.

Klauschies T, Vasseur DA, Gaedke U. 2016. Trait adaptation promotes species coexistence in diverse predator and prey communities. Ecology & Evolution 6: 4141–4159. Google Scholar

21.

Lee C, Lin F, Lu C, Wang C. [eds.] 1991. Natural Enemies and Their Use in the Bio-Control of Insect Pests in Taiwan. Proceedings of International Seminar on Enhancement of Functional Biodiversity Relevant to Sustainable Food Production, Tsukuba, Japan. MARCO, Tsukuba, Japan. Google Scholar

22.

Loomans AJM. 2006. Exploration for hymenopterous parasitoids of thrips. Bulletin of Insectology 59: 69–83. Google Scholar

23.

Men UB. 1999. Orius maxidentex Ghauri as predator on sunflower thrips. Insect Environment 5: 22–23. Google Scholar

24.

Montserrat M, Albajes R, Castañé C. 2000. Functional response of four heteropteran predators preying on greenhouse whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) and western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Environmental Entomology 29: 1075–1082. Google Scholar

25.

Mound LA, Walker AK. 1987. Thysanoptera as tropical tramps: new records from New Zealand and the Pacific. New Zealand Entomologist 9: 70–85. Google Scholar

26.

Nagai K, Yano E. 2000. Predation by Orius sauteri (Poppius) (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) on Thrips palmi Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae): functional response and selective predation. Applied Entomology and Zoology 35: 565–574. Google Scholar

27.

Palmer J. 1987. Population structure, genetics and taxonomy of aphids and Thysanoptera. The Hague, Netherlands. Google Scholar

28.

Reitz SR, Funderburk JE, Waring SM. 2006. Differential predation by the generalist predator Orius insidiosus on congeneric species of thrips that vary in size and behavior. The Netherlands Entomological Society 119: 179–188. Google Scholar

29.

Tang L, Yan K, Fu B, Wu J, Liu K, Lu Y. 2015. The life table parameters of Megalurothrips usitatus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on four leguminous crops. Florida Entomologist 98: 620–625. Google Scholar

30.

Tang L, Zhao H, Fu B, Han Y, Liu K, Wu J. 2016. Colored sticky traps to selectively survey thrips in cowpea ecosystem. Neotropical Entomology 45: 96–101. Google Scholar

31.

Wang S, Michaud JP, Tan X, Zhang F. 2014a. Comparative suitability of aphids, thrips and mites as prey for the flower bug Orius sauteri (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). European Journal of Entomology 111: 221–226. Google Scholar

32.

Wang R, Wang XL, Wang S, Zhang F. 2014b. Evaluation of the potential biocontrol capacity of Orius sauteri (Hemiptera, Anthocoridae) on Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera, Thripidae). Environmental Entomology 36: 983–989. Google Scholar

33.

Xu X, Enkegaard A. 2009. Prey preference of Orius sauteri between western flower thrips and spider mites. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 132: 93–98. Google Scholar

34.

Zou Y, Geng J, Chen G, Meng Q, Wang G. 1996. Predation of Harmonia axyridis nymph on Schizaphis graminum. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 7: 197–200. Google Scholar
Pingping Liu, Wantong Jia, Xuan Zheng, Liu Zhang, Rouguiatou Sangbaramou, Shuqian Tan, Yiqing Liu, and Wangpeng Shi "Predation Functional Response and Life Table Parameters of Orius sauteri (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) Feeding on Megalurothrips usitatus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)," Florida Entomologist 101(2), 254-259, (1 June 2018). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.101.0216
Published: 1 June 2018
KEYWORDS
bean flower thrips
biological control
caupí control biológic
cowpea
flower bugs
insectos de flores
trips de frijol
Back to Top